Score 10 9 8 7 6

Category
Hazardous
without Harzardous
Severity warning with warning Very High High Moderate
Occurrence <=1 in 2 1 in 3 1 in 8 1 in 20 1 in 80
Absosute
Detection Uncertainty Very Remote Remote Very Low Low

Terminology
A. Process or Product Name – Description of Process or Product being analyzed.
B. Responsible – Name of Process Owner.
C. Prepared By - Name of Agent coordinating FMEA study.
D. FMEA Date – Dates of Initial and subsequent FMEA Revisions.
Process Step/Part
E. Potential Number
Failure Mode – Description
– Description of individual
of how item
the process being
could analyzed.fail to meet the
potentially
F. process requirements and/or design intent, i.e. a description of a non-conformance at that
specific process step.
G. Potential Failure Effects – Description of the effects of the Failure Mode upon the customer, i.e.
what the next user
SEV (Severity) of assessment
– An the process ofor the
product would experience
seriousness of the effectorofnotice.
the potential failure mode
H. upon the customer.
Potential Causes – Description of how the failure could occur, described in terms of something
that can
I. OCC be corrected– or
(Occurrence) controlled.of how frequently the specific failure cause is expected to
Description
occur, ranked
J. Current on a– scale
Controls of 1 to of
Description 10process
as per the table below.
controls that either prevent, to the extent possible, the
K. failure mode from occurring, or detect the failure mode should it occur.
L. DET (Detection) – An assessment of the probability that the current controls will detect the
potential cause, or the subsequent failure mode.
M. RPN (Risk Priority Number) – The product of the Severity, Occurrence, and Detection
Rankings i.e. RPN = SEV * OCC * DET.
N. Actions Recommended – Actions to reduce any or all of the Occurrence, Severity or Detection
rankings.
O. Responsibility – Person or group responsible for the Recommended Action.
P. Actions Taken – Brief description of actual action and effective date.
Q. New SEVERITY Rating after corrective action.
R. New OCCURENCE Rating after corrective action.
S. New DETECTION Rating after corrective action.
T. Resulting new RPN after corrective action.
 5 4 3 2 1

Low Very Low Minor Very Minor None

1 in 400 1 in 2000 1 in 15000 1 in 150000 >=1 in 150K
Moderately
Moderate High High Very High Almost Certain

Score SEVERITY CRITERIA Score

10 Fuera de Ne, Defecto periódico 10
9 Hilo barrado 9
8 Exceso de Neps 8
7 Variación de humedad 7
6 CV masa 6

5 5

4 4
3 3
2 Pilosidad 2
1 1

Note: To change header information, click on "View" then "Header".

RISK: Optional field used to reflect the probability of completing actions.

 670 tons

OCCURENCE DETECTION
³1 in 2 Very High Absolute Uncertainty
1 in 3 Very High Very Remote
1 in 8 High Remote
1 in 20 High Very Low
1 in 80 Moderate Low

1 in 400 Moderate Moderate

1 in 2,000 Moderate Moderately High

1 in 15,000 Low High
1 in 150,000 Low Very High
£1 in 1,500,000 Remote Almost Certain

ader".
 SCORING
Score 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Category
Hazardous
without Harzardous
Severity warning with warning Very High High Moderate Low Very Low Minor Very Minor None
Occurrence <=1 in 2 1 in 3 1 in 8 1 in 20 1 in 80 1 in 400 1 in 2000 1 in 15000 1 in 150000 >=1 in 150K
Absosute Moderately
Detection Uncertainty Very Remote Remote Very Low Low Moderate High High Very High Almost Certain

Terminology Score SEVERITY CRITERIA OCCURENCE DETECTION

A. Process or Product Name – Description of Process or Product being analyzed. 10 Hazardous Without Warning ³1 in 2 Very High Absolute Uncertainty
B. Responsible – Name of Process Owner. 9 Hazardous With Warning 1 in 3 Very High Very Remote
C. Prepared By - Name of Agent coordinating FMEA study. 8 Very High 1 in 8 High Remote
D. FMEA Date – Dates of Initial and subsequent FMEA Revisions. 7 High 1 in 20 High Very Low
E. Process
PotentialStep/Part Number
Failure Mode – Description
– Description of individual
of how the processitem being
could analyzed.fail to meet the
potentially 6 Moderate 1 in 80 Moderate Low
F. process requirements and/or design intent, i.e. a description of a non-conformance at that
specific process step. 5 Low 1 in 400 Moderate Moderate
G. Potential Failure Effects – Description of the effects of the Failure Mode upon the customer, i.e.
what (Severity)
SEV the next user of assessment
– An the process ofor the
product would experience
seriousness of the effectorofnotice.
the potential failure mode 4 Very Low 1 in 2,000 Moderate Moderately High
upon the customer.
H. Potential Causes – Description of how the failure could occur, described in terms of something 3 Minor 1 in 15,000 Low High
I. that
OCCcan be corrected– or
(Occurrence) controlled.of how frequently the specific failure cause is expected to
Description 2 Very Minor 1£1inin150,000 Low Very High
occur, ranked
J. Current on a– scale
Controls of 1 to of
Description 10process
as per the table below.
controls that either prevent, to the extent possible, the 1 None 1,500,000 Remote Almost Certain
K. failure mode from occurring, or detect the failure mode should it occur.
L. DET (Detection) – An assessment of the probability that the current controls will detect the
potential cause, or the subsequent failure mode.
M. RPN (Risk Priority Number) – The product of the Severity, Occurrence, and Detection
Rankings i.e. RPN = SEV * OCC * DET. Note: To change header information, click on "View" then "Header".
N. Actions Recommended – Actions to reduce any or all of the Occurrence, Severity or Detection
rankings.
O. Responsibility – Person or group responsible for the Recommended Action. RISK: Optional field used to reflect the probability of completing actions.
P. Actions Taken – Brief description of actual action and effective date.
Q. New SEVERITY Rating after corrective action.
R. New OCCURENCE Rating after corrective action.
S. New DETECTION Rating after corrective action.
T. Resulting new RPN after corrective action.

Page 4
Company: Your Co, Inc.
Page 5 of 5
Project: Copying Process FMEA Printed on 05/02/2024 20:07:38
Owner __Key Operator_

S O D R Actual
p Risk
E C E P Action Responsibl Schedule Action Completion p p p
r
p X
Part/process Modo de Fallas Effects Falla V Causas C Controles T N Recommended e Person Date Taken Date SOD n Risk prpn
Batan % de Mezcla no estándar Hilo barrado 9 Mezcla de Alg. 3 Insp.Cargas 1 27 0 0
Reproceso x Fuera d Estándar Reprocesos 0 0 0
Exceso de Neps 0 0 0
0 0 0

Cardas Fuera de Titulo Variacion de Rollos 6 Ajuste Mecanico 4 Pesos 1 24 0 0

Mat.Prima, Ajuste
Exceso de Neps Hilado 8 Carda 7 Periodica 5 280 0 0
0 0 0
REUNIDORAS Fuera de Titulo Reprocesos 6 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 1 12 0 0
0 0 0
PEINADORAS Fuera de Titulo Reprocesos 6 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 1 12 0 0
% Peinado bajo Variación de RKM 7 Ajuste Mecanico 3 Periodica 1 21
Mayor consumo
% Peinado alto algodón 8 Ajuste Mecanico 3 Periodica 1 24
Incremento de CVM 0 0 0
Luwa 0 0 0
0 0 0
MANUARES Fuera de Titulo Reprocesos 8 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 2 32 0 0
CVM Reprocesos 8 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 2 32 0 0
Defecto Periodico Reprocesos 9 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 2 36 0 0
0 0 0
Mayor consumo
MECHERAS Ne algodón 8 Ajuste Mecanico 2 Periodica 7 112 0 0
Falla periodicas 0 0 0
0 0 0

Fmea Form