Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Japan Position Paper
Japan Position Paper
Delegation: Japan
Topic: Examining strategies of civilian protection in areas of
armed conflict
Japan believes that it is crucial to reiterate the importance of observing international humanitarian law,
and how a lack of adherence to its policies will only result in greater loss of life. This should be
heavily encouraged to sides currently engaging in armed conflict; The Israel-Hamas war and the
Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Additionally, the strengthening of critical international legal frameworks
(IHL) is necessary to cultivate greater security for civilians. Japan advocates for the ratification and
implementation of key international treaties and conventions, such as the Convention on the Rights of
the Child and the Convention on the Protection of Persons in Humanitarian Crises, as well as
supporting efforts to hold perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity accountable through
national and international justice mechanisms. Furthermore, it is the belief of Japan that frequent
intervention from external parties in armed conflict can only disrupt the establishment of
accountability and generate more conflict and instability for the civilians, which would undermine the
necessity for IHL to be upheld. Therefore, Japan encourages that UN organisations are empowered to
implement the principles of IHL but also actively alleviate the burdens on civilians who inhabit zones
where armed conflict is prevalent through strictly non-violent ground support.
Furthermore, Japan believes that violations of human rights (under IHL) that should be inherently
unmitigated; for example, the access to food and sanitary water, medical care shelter, should result in
Punitive Military and Economic Sanctions and Diplomatic Isolation. Japan encourages this as a
method to incentivise nations to uphold the integrity of International Humanitarian Law. Diplomatic
Isolation would be through supporting efforts to diplomatically isolate countries that persist in failing
to observe International Humanitarian Law by encouraging other nations to limit diplomatic
engagement and cooperation until they comply with international norms and treaties. Punitive
measures would involve impediments to the perpetrating nations military, thus implementing UN
surveillance and inhibiting the states military capacities. Additionally, Economic Sanctions are
interpreted to be a pivotal approach to promote non-proliferation, therefore disabling a nation's
capacity to violate IHL through civilian harm and compelling future cooperation with IHL, thus
fostering a safer future and protection for civilians in armed conflict zones.
REFERENCES
Mari Yamaguchi - Japan pledges $4.5B more in aid for Ukraine, including $1B in humanitarian funds
(2028) - Accessed 7/12/2023
https://apnews.com/article/japan-ukraine-support-humanitarian-aid-g7-ac26f0224efbdcdfd75f
bfdfbf6c9da8
Japan resumes funding to UNRWA for its ‘indispensable’ aid work in Gaza - (2024) - Accessed
2/04/2023
https://www.timesofisrael.com/japan-resumes-funding-to-unrwa-for-its-indispensable-aid-wor
k-in-gaza/
Reuters - Japan PM tells Israel's Netanyahu civilian casualties should be minimised (2023) Accessed
6/12/2023
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/japan-pm-tells-israels-netanyahu-civilian-casualtie
s-should-be-minimized-2023-12-06/#:~:text=%22Prime%20Minster%20Kishida%20stated%2
0continued,a%20Foreign%20Ministry%20announcement%20said.
H.E. Ms. KAMIKAWA Yoko - Minister for Foreign affairs of Japan (2023)
https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Japan-MOFA.pdf
Ministry of Foreign affairs - Humanitarian Aid Policy of Japan - (2011) Accessed 07/2011
https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/emergency/pdfs/aid_policy_japan.pdf
Japan’s contributions to the UNHCR - (2023)
https://reporting.unhcr.org/donors/japan