The title is comprehensive and informative, detailing the focus of the study.

However, it might benefit from some simplification and clarity for a broader audience.

Here's an alternative suggestion:

"Comparing Tomato Production: Innovative Non-Circulating Aquaponics vs. Conventional Hydroponics"

This title maintains the essence of your study while making it more accessible and concise. It highlights
the comparison between the two methods and the specific focus on tomato production.

The abstract provides a good overview of the study's objectives and methods. However, it could benefit
from a clearer statement of the hypotheses and specific research objectives. Here are some suggestions
to enhance clarity:

Objectives: It would be helpful to explicitly state the research objectives in the abstract. For instance:

1st Clarify if the study aims to compare the effectiveness of the different hydroponic systems in terms of
growth, yield, and quality of tomatoes.

2nd Mention if the primary goal was to assess the feasibility of the newly developed non-recirculating
aquaponics system in comparison to conventional hydroponic systems.

Hypotheses: The abstract lacks a clear statement of the hypotheses being tested. For example:

If the study intended to test hypotheses regarding the productivity or efficiency differences between the
non-recirculating aquaponics system and conventional hydroponic systems, explicitly state those
hypotheses.

For instance, hypotheses might include expectations of higher yield or better resource utilization in the
aquaponics system compared to traditional hydroponics.

Adding a brief section specifying the hypotheses to be tested and outlining the main objectives of the
research would provide a clearer roadmap for readers. This would ensure that readers grasp the study's
specific aims and the expected outcomes before delving into the detailed results.
Literature Cited Are the related literatures adequate?

The references provided cover a wide range of topics related to tomato production, hydroponics,
aquaponics, and related agricultural practices.

However, to conduct a comprehensive comparative assessment between intensive tomato production in

innovative non-circulating aquaponics versus conventional hydroponics, you might want to consider a
few more references specifically focused on

Non-circulating Aquaponics: Look for studies that specifically delve into non-circulating aquaponics
systems and their effectiveness in terms of plant growth, nutrient uptake, water usage, and overall
productivity.

Comparative Studies: Search for research that directly compares non-circulating aquaponics and
conventional hydroponics in terms of tomato production. These studies should ideally analyze factors
such as yield, quality of produce, resource utilization (water, nutrients), and economic viability.

Tomato-Specific Studies: It's beneficial to find references that specifically focus on tomatoes in
aquaponics or hydroponics systems, as the requirements and responses of different crops can vary.

While the references you've provided touch on relevant aspects, it might be helpful to search for
additional literature that directly addresses the comparison between non-circulating aquaponics and
conventional hydroponics, especially with a focus on tomato production. This could provide a more
robust foundation for your comparative assessment.

The methodology you've provided seems comprehensive and detailed, which is often beneficial for
scientific research. However, the level of detail required in a methodology section can vary depending on
the specific requirements of the study, the target audience, and the journal's guidelines.

In terms of completeness, your methodology covers various essential aspects:

Experimental Setup: You've detailed the experimental site, including geographic information and climate
data, which is crucial for contextualizing the study.
Treatment Description: Clear descriptions of the three systems (OBS, DWCHS, DWCAS) and their
components provide a thorough understanding of the experimental setup.

Planting and Management: You've covered the process of crop establishment, fertilizer application,
irrigation, and management of the plants in each system, including specific details about nutrient
solutions, pH adjustments, and environmental conditions.

Data Collection: The methodology includes details on parameters measured, such as plant growth, fruit
physical parameters, water, fertilizer use, biomass production, and statistical analysis methods.

Statistical Analysis: Mention of statistical methods (ANOVA) for data analysis is essential and contributes
to the rigor of the study.

Regarding adequacy, the methodology appears quite detailed, which can be advantageous for replication
and understanding the study's nuances. However, for some readers or specific publication requirements,
it might seem slightly detailed. Depending on the journal or audience, you might consider condensing
certain sections without losing crucial information or moving some technical details to supplementary
materials.

In summary, the methodology provides a comprehensive overview of the experimental setup,

procedures, and data collection methods. It's detailed, which is beneficial for clarity and replicability, but
you might consider adjusting the level of detail based on the target audience or journal guidelines while
ensuring you retain the essential information needed to understand and replicate the study.

Yes, the conclusion appears to be well-rooted in the results and objectives outlined in the study. Here's
how:

Objectives Met:

The conclusion effectively summarizes the main findings, reaffirming the objectives of the study, such as
comparing different tomato cultivation methods (DWCHS, DWCAS, and OBS).
It highlights the yield differences among these methods, confirming the research objective to evaluate
their efficacy.

Results-Based Assertions:

The conclusion aligns with the results obtained in the study, mentioning the higher tomato yields in
DWCHS and DWCAS compared to OBS, supported by the data presented in the earlier sections.

It connects these results to the study's broader aim of sustainable food production, emphasizing the
potential of DWCAS for achieving this goal.

New Insights and Contributions:

The conclusion underscores the novelty of the study, particularly the demonstration of a non-circulating
deep water culture crop growing method.

It highlights how the study contributes to the existing knowledge by showcasing the potential and
benefits of DWCAS in tomato cultivation.

Overall, the conclusion effectively ties the study's objectives with the obtained results, highlighting the
significance of the findings and their implications for agricultural practices. It appropriately summarizes
the main findings and their alignment with the study's goals.

Certainly! Here are some recommendations to enhance the study:

Replication and Validation: Conduct the study with multiple replications to ensure the reliability and
robustness of the results. Validating the findings in different settings or environments could strengthen
the study's credibility.

Longer Duration Study: Extending the study duration could provide insights into the long-term
sustainability and performance of the different cultivation methods, allowing for better understanding of
crop cycles, changes in yield over time, and system stability.

Controlled Variables: Ensure better control over variables like environmental conditions (temperature,
humidity, light), nutrient levels, and fish stocking density across different treatments to minimize
potential confounding factors.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Include a comprehensive economic analysis that considers the initial setup costs,
operational expenses, and overall profitability of each cultivation method to provide a holistic view of
their economic feasibility.

Water Quality Monitoring: Monitor and analyze the quality of fish wastewater used in DWCAS to
understand its impact on plant growth, nutrient levels, and potential alterations in the water chemistry
affecting crop yield and quality.

Comparison with Other Systems: Expand the study to compare DWCAS with additional hydroponic or
aquaponic systems, if feasible, to gain deeper insights into its relative advantages and limitations in
various contexts.

Fertilizer Management: Investigate optimized fertilizer application strategies specific to DWCAS,

considering the nutrient uptake by both plants and fish to enhance efficiency and minimize waste.

Publication and Knowledge Sharing: Publish the findings in scientific journals and share the knowledge
through conferences or seminars to contribute to the scientific community and encourage further
research in sustainable agriculture.

These recommendations aim to refine the study design, improve data reliability, and expand the scope
for a more comprehensive understanding of the different cultivation methods, thereby contributing to
the advancement of agricultural practices.