ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

GROUP 1

GRADE AND STRAND: 11 - Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS)

TITLE: “Exploring the Level of Intimacy and Communication Patterns in Unlabeled Relationships of the
Selected Senior High School Students of Cabangan High School”

MEMBERS CONTRIBUTION GRADE

1. Rihanna L. Borlagdan - ● Wrote the introduction. 98

Leader ● Wrote the statement of the problem.
● Wrote the significance of the study in guidance
counselors and researchers.
● Searched and read related literature and
studies.
● Wrote the entire related studies.
● Wrote the entire synthesis of the
state-of-the-art.
● Formed the theoretical paradigm and
conceptual paradigm.
● Wrote the conceptual framework.
● Wrote the definition of terms.
● Wrote the research design.
● Wrote the respondents of the study.
● Wrote the research instrument.
● Cited the references.
● Wrote the proposal defense script.
● Edited and added details in all parts of
chapters 1-3.
● Fixed the format such as the spacing,
indentation, fonts, etc. of the research paper.
● Always present in group meeting and writing
sessions.
● Created the powerpoint presentation for
proposal defense.
● Present during the proposal defense.
● Paid for the panelists’ snacks.

2. Mary Joelle E. Beato ● Wrote the introduction. 96

● Searched and read for related literature and
studies.
● Wrote the related literature.
● Wrote the gap to be bridged by the study.
● Wrote the respondents of the study.
● Cited the references.
● Wrote her part in the script.
● Always present in group meeting and writing
sessions with only 2-3 absences.
● Present during proposal defense.
 3. Jasmin E. Retuerma ● Wrote the introduction. 96
● Wrote the scope and delimitation.
● Read related studies.
● Wrote the theoretical framework.
● Helped in forming the theoretical paradigm.
● Wrote the research design.
● Wrote the data gathering.
● Wrote the statistical treatment.
● Provided the internet.
● Sometimes present in group meeting and
writing sessions with some absences.
● Paid for the panelists' snacks.
● Present during proposal defense.

4. El Zhais D. Bellen ● Wrote the significance of the study in students 92

and parents.
● Helped in editing and forming the theoretical
paradigm.
● Edited the conceptual paradigm.
● Wrote the sources of data.
● Provided the resources such as bond paper,
printer, and internet.
● Paid for the panelists’ snacks.
● Sometimes present in group meeting and
writing sessions with many absences.
● Present during proposal defense.

5. Jasmine Ll. Trinidad ● Wrote the research instrument. 88

● Provided the laptop.
● Paid for the panelists’ snacks.
● Sometimes present in group meeting and
writing sessions with a few absences.
● Present during proposal defense.

6. Jerome D. Cardel ● Wrote the significance of the study in teachers 90

and future researchers.
● Wrote the conceptual framework.
● Wrote his part on the script.
● Sometimes present in group meeting and
writing sessions with many absences.
● Paid for the panelists’ snacks.
● Present during proposal defense.

The leader graded the members based on their listed contribution above and based on her observation
on who always attends in group meeting and writing sessions. Therefore, the members who have more
contributions and is always present in group meeting and writing sessions received a high grade. The
research study will not be successful without the combined efforts of all members of the group. However,
the members who took most parts in writing the research paper received higher grades than those who
only provided resources and paid for the contribution. For the leader's grade, the leader asked her
groupmates opinions to avoid biased and unfair grading.