Under Robert's Rules of Order, the general principle is that a majority vote is required to

pass most motions, which typically means more than half of the members present and
voting. However, there are instances when a higher threshold, such as a two-
thirds (2/3) vote, is required. The rationale behind this is to provide
additional protection for certain actions that might have significant
consequences or require a broader consensus.
Here are a few examples of situations where a two-thirds vote may be required
according to Robert's Rules of Order:
1. Suspending the rules: If someone wishes to deviate from the normal rules of
procedure for a specific purpose or time period, a two-thirds vote may be needed
to suspend the rules temporarily.
2. Amending bylaws: Modifying the bylaws of an organization typically requires a
higher threshold to ensure that any changes are well-considered and enjoy broad
support.
3. Expelling a member: Removing a member from an organization or body often
necessitates a two-thirds vote to protect the rights of individual members and
prevent arbitrary or unjust expulsions.
4. Overriding a veto: If an executive or presiding officer has the power to veto a
decision, overriding that veto typically requires a two-thirds vote to demonstrate
stronger support for the action.
 A veto is the power or right of an individual or entity to reject or block a
decision, proposal, or action taken by others. It is a tool used to prevent
the enactment of a particular measure or to halt its progress.

Why is 2/3 required?

The requirement of a two-thirds vote in certain situations serves several purposes and
provides certain benefits within the context of parliamentary procedures. Here are some
reasons why a two-thirds vote may be required:
 Protecting minority rights: Requiring a higher threshold, such as a two-
thirds vote, can help ensure that decisions with significant consequences or those
affecting individual rights are not made hastily or without sufficient support. It
provides a safeguard for the rights of the minority by making it more difficult to
pass measures that may disproportionately impact them.
 Encouraging broader consensus: Requiring a higher majority threshold
promotes the need for broader agreement and consensus on certain matters. By
setting a higher bar for approval, it encourages members to engage in more
thorough discussion, negotiation, and persuasion to build a wider base of support
for the proposed action.

 Maintaining stability and consistency: In situations where the bylaws or

rules of an organization are being amended, a higher threshold like a two-thirds
vote ensures that changes to the governing principles are not easily made. This
helps maintain stability and consistency by preventing frequent modifications
that might disrupt the organization's functioning or create confusion.

 Preserving the integrity of procedures: When temporarily suspending the

regular rules of procedure or overriding a veto, a two-thirds vote is often
required. This ensures that such actions are not taken lightly and that they
genuinely reflect a strong desire for flexibility or reversal of a decision made by
the presiding officer.

 Enhancing legitimacy: Requiring a supermajority vote, such as two-thirds,

can enhance the perceived legitimacy and credibility of decisions made by an
organization. It demonstrates that significant consensus exists among the
members, making the outcome more acceptable and less likely to be challenged.