RESEARCH PROJECT

OF

DRAFTING, PLEADING AND CONVEYANCING

SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY

DR. SOUMYAJEET MUKOPADHYAY DHEERAJ JANGID

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR 990, SEM IX ‘A’

NUSRL, RANCHI NUSRL, RANCHI

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW,

RANCHI

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. NO. CHAPTERIZATION PAGE NO.

1. CIVIL PLEADING: PLAINT 4

2. CIVIL PLEADING: WRITTEN STATEMENT 9

2. CRIMINAL PLEADING: COMPLAINT 14

3. DEED OF CONVEYANCING: SALE DEED 25

4. DEED OF CONVEYANCING: GIFT DEED 28

2
 CIVIL PLEADING
(PLAINT + WRITTEN STATEMENT)

3
 PLAINT

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (DISTRICT, LUCKNOW), LUCKNOW, U.P.

SUIT NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Plaintiff

VERSUS

Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Defendant

SUIT FOR EJECTMENT UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE U.P. URBAN BUILDINGS

(REGULATION OF LETTING, RENT AND EVICTION) ACT, 1972.

The above-named plaintiff states as follows:-

1. The plaintiff being the owner of Building no. 8 of Sector 18, Singar Nagar, U.P. let out the
portion of the said building to Mr. Salman Khan, who is the defendant in the present case.
2. The plaintiff instituted the suit on the ground that the defendant was a tenant of a portion of
the building and was a trespasser in respect of the remaining portion. The defendant therefore
is liable to be ejected from the portion he was occupying as trespasser and from the portion,
he was occupying as tenant because he had defaulted in paying arrears of rent and had made
material alterations in the building, which had affected adversely the utility of the building.
Therefore, the plaintiffs being in need of the premises in question approached the defendant
for vacation of the same on various dates.

4
3. However, the defendant who was approached did not agree to the plaintiff's demand. The
plaintiffs thereafter served a legal notice through their Counsel, under Section 106 of
Transfer of Property Act terminating the said tenancy on 16/07/2022.
4. That the defendant received the plaintiff's legal notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of
property Act on 01/07/2022 i.e. clearly 15 days before the last day i.e. 16/07/2022 and thus is
a valid notice under the Transfer of Property Act (proof of the service of legal notice is
annexed to same as Annexure A).
5. That however, the defendant even after receiving the said legal notice have neither vacated
the premises nor shown their intention to vacate. Thus, the defendant from 16/07/2022 are in
wrongful use and occupation at ₹ 1,000/- per day as the rate of rent in the area are for such
premises prevailing and the plaintiff has rightly assessed the rate of ₹ 1,000/- per day. The
same rate was demanded in the legal notice dated 01/07/2022. That since the premises were
needed by the plaintiff for his own purpose, he will have to take on rent the premises of same
size in the same area where the building is situated and the plaintiff has done a market survey
during the search for the building and found that the rate of rent in the area is ₹ 100/- to ₹
150/- per sq. feet. The plaintiff owns a building which is 450 sq. ft. super area will be
available in the market for ₹ 37000/- to 55,500/- per month.
6. The plaintiff does not have means to take on rent a building for own purposes at such high
rates and thus needed the building and for this reason asked the defendant to vacate the
premises.
7. The defendant is presently paying a monthly rent of ₹ 12,000/- per month (Rupees twelve
thousand only) for the plaintiffs building measuring 450 sq. ft. super area. The plaintiff’s
premises are not governed by U.P. Urban Building Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction
Act, 1972) as the rate of rent is more than ₹ 3,500/- and thus the Hon'ble Court has
jurisdiction to try the matter.
8. The cause of action in the present case arose on 24/05/2022 when the plaintiffs approached
the defendant for the vacation of the said Building. The cause of action further arose on
15/06/2022 when the plaintiffs again approached the defendant for the vacation of building
that however did not oblige. The cause of action further arose when the plaintiffs served a
legal notice dated 1/07/2022 through their advocate Mr. Dheeraj Jangid asking the defendant
to vacate the same.

5
9. The said notice was duly received on 16/07/2022. However, the defendant did not vacate the
building in question. The cause of action in the present case is a continuing one.
10. That since the property whose possession is sought is situated in Lucknow. The Lease for the
premises was executed in Lucknow and delivery of possession made in Lucknow.
11. That the court fee payable has been calculated ad valorem as per the chart/section 7 of the
Court Fee Act on the annual rent received by the plaintiff. The annual rent is ₹ 1,44,000/-
(Rupees one lakh and forty four thousand only) arrived at by multiplying monthly rent of ₹
12,000/- by 12 On this, a court fee of ₹ 3174/- is paid. The plaintiff undertakes to pay any
additional court fee that may be found due by the Hon'ble Court.

PRAYER

It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court might be pleased to:

i. pass a decree for ejectment against the defendant and in favour of plaintiff;
ii. pass a decree for payment of damages at ₹ 1,000/- per day for wrongful use and
occupation of the building by the defendant ;
iii. Any other relief deemed fit and proper may also be given.
iv. Costs of the case may also be given.

PLAINTIFF

THROUGH

ADVOCATE DHEERAJ JANGID

Lucknow

Dated:

6
VERIFICATION

Verification at Lucknow on 1st November of 2022 that the contents of paras 1 to 5 are true to our
personal knowledge and those of paras 6 to 10 are true & correct on the basis of legal advice
received and believed to be true. Last para is prayer to the Hon'ble Court.

PLAINTIFF

[NOTE: This plaint has to be supported by an affidavit]

7
 IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (DISTRICT, LUCKNOW), LUCKNOW, U.P.

SUIT NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Plaintiff

VERSUS

Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Defendant

AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit of Mr. Ranbir Kapoor, S/o Rishi Kapoor, aged 41 years, R/o Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu
Vihar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, in the capacity of the owner of the premises, the deponent
hereinabove do hereby solemnly affirm and state hereunder:

1. 1 am aware of the facts and circumstances of the present suit based upon the records of the
Plaintiff maintained in the ordinary course of business and I am duly competent to swear and file
the present suit and affidavit.

2. I say that the accompanying Suit has been drafted and filed by my counsel upon my
instructions and contents of the same are true and correct.

3. I say that the documents filed along with the plaint are true copies of originals.

PLAINTIFF

8
 WRITTEN STATEMENT

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (DISTRICT, LUCKNOW), LUCKNOW, U.P.

SUIT NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Plaintiff

VERSUS

Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Defendant

WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT

The above-named defendant states as follows:-

PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

1. That this Hon'ble Court has no jurisdiction to entertain and try this suit because the said
matter will come under U.P. Control of Rent and Eviction Act.
2. That the suit has not been properly valued for the purpose of court fees and jurisdiction and is
therefore liable to be rejected out rightly.
3. That there is absolutely no cause faction in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.
The suit is therefore liable to be rejected on this ground also.
4. The notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act was bad because it was not given
to the lessee.

ON MERITS

9
 Without prejudice to the preliminary objections stated above, the reply on merits, which is
without prejudice to one another, is as under:-

1. That para 1 of the plaint is partly correct and is admitted except the fact that only a portion of
the building was given on rent, whereas, the whole building was given on rent.
2. That the contents of para 2 of the plaint are denied for want of knowledge. The Plaintiff is
put to the strict proof of each and every allegation made in the para under reply. As the
defendant had committed no default in payment of rent and had made no material alterations
as to make them liable for ejectment.
3. Contents of paras 3 and 4 are denied as notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property was
bad because it was not given to the lessee and also because it was not in respect to the entire
premises that were the subject matter of the tenancy.
4. That the contents of para 5 of the plaint are absolutely incorrect and are denied. As a matter
of fact, Mr. N is the owner of the suit properly. However, the remaining contents of para
under reply are absolutely incorrect and are denied.

PRAYER

It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court might be pleased to:

i. Dismiss the suit of the plaintiff.

ii. Award costs to the defendant.
iii. Pass any other just and equitable order as deemed fit in the interest of justice.

DEFENDANT

THROUGH

ADVOCATE NISHANT BORA

Lucknow

Dated:

10
VERIFICATION

Verification at Lucknow on 6 December 2022 that the contents of paras 1 of the preliminary
objections and para 1 to 4 of reply on merits are true to my personal knowledge and those of
paras 1 to 4 of preliminary objections and para 1 to 4 of reply on merits are true & correct on the
basis of legal advice received and believed to be true. Last para is prayer to the Hon'ble Court.

DEFENDANT

[NOTE: Counter Claim, Set off can be joined in the Written Statement and the same may be
verified and supported by affidavit]

11
 IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (DISTRICT, LUCKNOW), LUCKNOW, U.P.

SUIT NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Plaintiff

VERSUS

Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Defendant

AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit of Mr. Salman Khan, S/o Salim Khan, aged 58 years, R/o Sector F, Manas Nagar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh in the capacity of the owner of the premises, the deponent hereinabove
do hereby solemnly affirm and state hereunder:

1. 1 am aware of the facts and circumstances of the present written statement based upon the
records of the Defendant maintained in the ordinary course of business and I am duly competent
to swear and file a written statement and affidavit.

2. I say that the accompanying written statement has been drafted and filed by my counsel upon
my instructions and contents of the same are true and correct.

3. I say that the documents filed along with the written statement are true copies of originals.

DEFENDANT

12
CRIMINAL PLEADING
(COMPLAINT)

13
 COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAKET COURTS,

NEW DELHI

COMPLAINT CASE NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

1. Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Complainant 1

2. Mrs. Alia Bhatt, W/o Ranbir Kapoor, Age 31,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh – 226001. Complainant 2

VERSUS

1. Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Accused

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTIONS 156(3) AND 200 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CODE AGAINST THE ACCUSED

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the complainants are husband and wife and the complainant no. 1 is a labourer doing the
work of furniture and the complainant No.2 is a house wife. The ID Proof of the
complainants are annexed herewith as ANNEXURE- A & B.
2. That the accused persons are running business of property dealer and builder in partnership,
and during their business, they offered the complainant to sell a flat on 3rd floor, measuring
40 sq. yards, consisting one bedroom, one drawing room, one toilet, one kitchen, one
balcony, one scooter parking at ground floor, built on Property no.1091.Ward No.1, Khasra

14
 n. X, New Delhi and agreed to sell the said flat for total sale consideration of Rs. 13,00.000/-
and the said sale consideration amount was to be paid by the complainants in installments.
3. That as per agreement, the complainant paid a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in cash on the day of
agreement dated 13.01.2021 and further paid Rs.3,00,000/- in three installments, first
installment paid on 29.01.2021, second on 02.02.2021 and third one 09.02.2021. The accused
no.1 acknowledged the above said amount by issuing receipts duly signed and the accused
no.2 witnesses one of the receipts.
4. That the complainant no.1 was willing to purchase the said flat in the name of the
complainant no.2 who is his wife in love and affection, that is why he got his wife enter into
the above said agreement with the accused No.1, therefore, the complainant no.2 signed the
agreements and incidental documents thereto and the same were also signed by the accused
no.1, and the accused no.2 witnessed the same. Copies of Agreement to sale, payment
receipts and other documents regarding the sale of the above said flat are annexed herewith
as ANNEXURE-C (COLLY).
5. That at the time of execution of agreement, the accused persons said that they were working
together as partners and assured the complainants that the accused no.2 is having share in the
above said property and going to construct flats on the above said property and , thus the
accused persons took money from the complainants on the inducement of selling the above
said flat to the complainants. That the accused persons also assured the complainants that
they shall complete the construction and hand over the flat booked by the complainant to
them on or before 31.03.2022. Remaining balance amount was agreed to be paid by the
complainants to the accused persons at the time of registration of the sale deed with respect
to the flat booked by the complainants.
6. That the accused persons are very clever that they, after making agreement with the
complainant and taking part payment of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Five Lacs only) showed their true
colour and said to the complainant that they (accused persons) are unable to construct the
said flat as the abovesaid property, on which they were going to construct flats, does not
belong to them, the same belongs to DDA. That the complainants later on came to know that
said land is on the name of one Rajiya Begum.
7. That the accused persons avoided the complainants on one pretext and other but on the
persistent requests by the complainant, the accused no.2 issued two cheques bearing No.

15
 439215 dated 13.04.2021 and cheque No. 439214 dated 15.04.2021 of Rs. 1,00,000/- each
both drawn on Dena Bank, 181- A, Khirki Extn., New Delhi in favour of the complainant
No.1 and assured the complainants that they would surely be honoured on their presentation.
But in furtherance of their common malafide and dishonest intention to cheat the
complainants, the accused no.2 in conspiracy with the accused no.1, issued the abovesaid
cheques without maintaining sufficient balance in his account. The copies of abovesaid
cheques are annexed herewith as ANNEXURE-D-1 & D-2.
8. That the complainant No.1 presented the above said cheques with his banker i.e. State Bank
of India, Sultanpur (Branch), New Delhi for encashment, but the same were dishonoured
with the remarks "Insufficient Funds" on 16.04.2021 and 18.04.2021 respectively. The
cheque returning memos dated 25.04.2021 and 22.04.2021 are annexed herewith as
ANNEXURE-E-1 &E-2
9. That as soon as the complainant No.1 received the cheques dishonoured memos, then he
immediately contacted the accused persons but they again assured the complainant that they
(accused persons) are going to arrange money and now the said cheques would be honoured
positively. As per the instructions of the accused persons, the complainant again presented
the said cheques in his banker on 15.05.2021 for encashment, but both the cheques again
dishonoured with the remarks "Funds Insufficient" on 20.05.2021 and 22.05.2021
respectively. The cheque returning memos dated 24.05.2021 and 26.05.2021 are annexed
herewith as ANNEXURE-F-1 & F-2
10. That the complainants have also filed a complaint case U/s 138 of NI Act pertaining to the
two cheques of total amount of Rs.2 Lacs which is pending before the Hon'ble Court of
Nipun Kumar, MM, Saket Courts, New Delhi
11. It is pertinent to mention here that the complainants had sold their house at E-3, Shri Ram
Colony, Delhi-110094 to collect the amount of 5,00,000/- paid to the accused. The electricity
Bill of that address and the Bank Statement of Complainant No.1 of SBI, Mehrauli, Delhi
showing the transactions of money after the sale of previous house, is annexed herewith as
ANNEXURE-G (Colly.).
12. That it is a clear cut case of cheating, fraud and forgery by making false and forged
agreement to sale the flat/land of DDA by the accused persons and inducing the complainant
to deliver money to the accused on this forged presentation.

16
13. That the accused persons coming from influential class of builders have been threatening the
complainants to implicate in false and frivolous case and to kill them if they raise their voice
by making any complaint to police or court. The accused persons have proclaimed that
police, thana and court can do nothing against them. A Criminal Complaint dated 22.12.2021
stating the entire matter of cheating and fraud, was given to the SHO, P.S. Mehrauli, New
Delhi and Dy. Commissioner of Police, (South) Haus Khas, New Delhi. The copy of Police
Complaints dated 22.12.2021 is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE-H (Colly).
14. That the police did not take any action in the matter because of the reasons best known to
them. However, the complainant No.1 had given Letter of Reminder of the Complainant on
01.02.2022 to the Joint Commissioner of Police /SWR, at Police Head Quarters, I.P. Estate,
I.T.O. Delhi. Copy of the Reminder is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE-I
15. That entire family of the complainants are shocked and under mental stress facing the present
situation and the father of the complainant even expired due to pressure, stress and threat
given by the accused persons on 26.02.2022. The death certificate is annexed herewith as
ANNEXURE-J
16. That the accused have committed the offence U/s 420, 467,468 and 471 along with 506 of
IPC within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.
17. That the case has been filed within the period of limitation and on proper stamps.
18. That applicants submit that in the given facts and circumstances, the applicants being a
victim of cheating and fraud and criminal intimidation is left with no alternative but to
approach this Hon'ble Court for justice as the police have failed to act in the matter of
complaints.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the adequate action be taken in the interest of
justice. And the accused persons be tried and punished according to law.

COMPLAINANT NO.1 & 2

THROUGH

ADVOCATE DHEERAJ JANGID

17
New Delhi

Dated:

18
 IN THE COURT OF CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAKET COURTS,
NEW DELHI

COMPLAINT CASE NO. 0008 OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF

3. Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Complainant 1

4. Mrs. Alia Bhatt, W/o Ranbir Kapoor, Age 31,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh – 226001. Complainant 2

VERSUS

2. Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Accused

AFFIDAVIT

I, Ranbir Kapoor, aged about 41 years S/o Sh. Rishi Kapoor, R/o T-4, New Delhi do here by
solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

1. That I am the complainant No.1 in the said complaint and am well conversant with the facts
and circumstances of the case and am competent to swear this affidavit.

2. That accompanying complaint U/s 156(3) and 200, Cr.P.C. has been drafted by my counsel
under my instructions and contents of the same have been explained to me in vernacular and
understood by me and the same are not being repeated herein for the same of brevity and may be
read as part and parcel of this affidavit.

3. This is my true and correct statement.

19
 DEPONENT

VERIFICATION

Verified at New Delhi on this day of 23rd May, 2022, that the contents of my above affidavit are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.

DEPONENT

20
 IN THE COURT OF CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAKET COURTS,
NEW DELHI

COMPLAINT CASE NO. 0008 OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF

5. Mr. Ranbir Kapoor S/o Rishi Kapoor, Age 41,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001. Complainant 1

6. Mrs. Alia Bhatt, W/o Ranbir Kapoor, Age 31,

Resident of Sector 7/375, Jal Vayu Vihar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh – 226001. Complainant 2

VERSUS

3. Mr. Salman Khan S/o Salim Khan, Age 58,

Sector F, Manas Nagar,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226001 Accused

AFFIDAVIT

I, Alia Bhatt, aged about 31 w/o Ranbir Kapoor, R/o T-4, New Delhi do here by solemnly affirm
and declare as under:-

1. That I am the complainant No. 2 in the said complaint and am well conversant with the facts
and circumstances of the case and am competent to swear this affidavit.

2. That accompanying complaint U/s 156(3) and 200, Cr.P.C. has been drafted by my counsel
under my instructions and contents of the same have been explained to me in vernacular and
understood by me and the same are not being repeated herein for the same of brevity and may be
read as part and parcel of this affidavit.

3. This is my true and correct statement.

21
 DEPONENT

VERIFICATION

Verified at New Delhi on this day of 23rd May, 2022, that the contents of my above affidavit are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been
concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT

22
 LIST OF DOCUMENTS

S.NO. ANNEXURE DETAILS

1. A&B ID Proof of the Complainants
2. C (Colly) Copies of Agreement to sale, payment
receipts and other documents regarding the
sale of the flat
3. D-1 & D-2 The copy of two cheques of Rs.1,00,000/-
each dated 13.03.2021 and 15.03.2021
4. E-1 & E-2 Cheque returning memos dated 15.04.2021
and 18.04.2021
5. F-1 & F-2 Cheque returning memos dated 06.05.2021
and 07.05.2021
6. G Electricity Bill and Bank Statements of
SBI
7. H The copy of Police Complaints dated
22.12.2021
8. I Copy of the Reminder to Joint
Commissioner of Police dated 01.02.2022
9. J Death certificate of the father of the
Complainant No.1

FILED BY

ADVOCATE DHEERAJ JANGID

New Delhi

Dated:

23
DEED OF CONVEYANCING
(SALE DEED + GIFT DEED)

24
 SALE DEED

THIS DEED IS MADE on November 20, 2023.

BETWEEN

Ranbir Kapoor, son of Rishi Kapoor, aged 41, resident of 2/104, F.D. Colony, Sikar, Rajasthan,
hereinafter called the “VENDOR”(which expression shall, unless repugnant to the context and
meaning thereof shall mean and include his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns) of the
FIRST PART.

AND

Salman Khan, son of Salim Khan, aged 58, resident of 11/28, New H.C. Colony, Sikar,
Rajasthan, hereinafter called the “PURCHASER”(which expression shall, unless repugnant to
the context and meaning thereof shall mean and include his heirs, executors, administrators and
assigns) of the SECOND PART.

WHEREAS:

1. The VENDOR is absolutely seized and possessed of or otherwise well and sufficiently
entitled to the property described in the schedule herein below as the “said property”.
2. That the VENDOR has entered into an agreement to sell with the PURCHASER herein on 20
October, 2023 which is registered with the Registrar of Assurances at Sikar at serial No. 20
on 25 October, 2023.
3. That the PURCHASER has requested the VENDOR to execute these presents which he has
agreed to do.

NOW THE DEED WITNESSES:

1. That in pursuance of the agreement to sell dated 20 October, 2023 and in consideration of the
sum of Rs 44,00,000/-(Rupees Forty Four Lakhs) only, paid by the PURCHASER to the
VENDOR as per the details given in the Mode of Payment as mentioned below, the
VENDOR hereby conveys, transfers by way of sale unto the purchaser all that piece of land
referred to as the said property together with all the things permanently attached thereto or

25
 standing thereon and all other privileges, easements, profits, rights, appurtenances
whatsoever to the said property and other premises or any part thereof belonging or anyway
appurtenant thereto and ALL THE estate, right title, interest, use possession, benefit claim
and demand whatsoever at law or otherwise of the vendor to said property hereby conveyed
and every part thereof TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same to the absolute use and benefit
of the payment of all rents, rates, dues, taxes etc. that may be payable respect of the said
property.
2. That the VENDOR has put the PURCHASER in actual physical and peaceful possession of
the said property on 20 October, 2023 and the PURCHASER hereby admits and
acknowledges the same.
3. That from this day the PURCHASER shall enjoy and possess the said property as absolute
owner thereof with full power to convey or dispose of or alienate the same or any part
thereof, to any person or persons or party.
4. That the PURCHASER shall be at liberty to have or get his name registered in the office of
Sikar Notified Area Committee and will pay the Municipal charges and other charges,
accordingly.
5. That the VENDOR hereby assures unto the PURCHASER herein that the said property or
any part thereof is neither a subject matter of any acquisition or requisition nor subject matter
of any dispute or pending litigation.
6. That the VENDOR hereby assures and declares that the VENDOR has in himself good right
and full power and absolute authority to sell and transfer the said property in favour of the
PURCHASER herein.
7. That the VENDOR hereby further declares and assures unto the PURCHASER that the title
of the VENDOR to the said property is clean, clear and marketable and the same is free from
encumbrances.
8. That the VENDOR has delivered the prior sale deed of the said property as well as property
tax-bill and receipts which are all duly paid till the date of execution of these presents.
9. That all the expenses towards stamp duty, registration charges and other incidental expenses
thereto are to be borne by the PURCHASER.

26
 THE SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO:

All that piece and parcel of the Survey No. 59 admeasuring 5000 Sq. mtrs. situated within
registration division and district Sikar Sub Division and Taluka Kudli, within the limits of
Oberoi Corporation, bearing CTS No. 99 plot No. 23 carved out of the layout of S. No. 64 along
with.

Which is bounded as:

North: Open passage of house

South: Sky space;

East: Sky space;

West: End of plot;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed these presents on the 20th day of November
2023.

Signed, sealed and delivered by the VENDOR in Sikar in the presence of:

Witness:

1. Signature of VENDOR

2. Signature of PURCHASER

MEMO OF CONSIDERATION:

CHEQUE NO. DATE BANK AMOUNT

89037 05.09.2023 Punjab National Bank 20,00,000
RTGS 09.09.2023 Punjab National Bank 12,00,000
RTGS 15.10.2023 Punjab National Bank 12,00,000
44,00,000

27
 GIFT DEED

THIS DEED OF GIFT is made this 20th November, 2023.

BETWEEN

Ranbir Kapoor, son of Rishi Kapoor, aged about 41, resident of A4, Navya Sen Naman Vatika
Apartments, Belabagan, Deoghar hereinafter called “the Donor” (which expression shall unless it
be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof, mean and include his heirs, executors and
administrators) of the one part.

AND

Aryan Khan, son of Shah Rukh Khan, aged about 21 , resident of A1, Navya Sen Naman Vatika
Apartments, Belabagan, Deoghar hereinafter called “the Donee” (which expression shall unless
it be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof, mean and include his heirs, executors and
administrators) of the other part.

WHEREAS:

1. That the donee intends to start a school in his village Bengabad for the education of girls.
2. That the donor is desirous of donating the land fully mentioned and described in the Schedule
hereto to be used as a site for the said School.

NOW THIS DEED WITNESSES:

That in pursuance of the said pious wish and desire and as a patron of the proposed school to be
started by the donee, the donor do hereby and hereunder freely and voluntarily grant, convey,
transfer, give, assign and assure unto and to the use of the donee and his successor ALL THAT
to be used solely and exclusively for the purpose of a site for construction and accommodation of
the proposed girls’ school.

That the property described herein schedule below and valued at Rs. 2 Crore TO HAVE AND
HOLD the same so long as the same shall be used and occupied as a site and/or building of the
school.

28
THAT the donee accepts the gift of the said property hereunder made solely and exclusively for
the purpose hereinbefore indicated subject to the condition hereunder provided.

And it is hereby AGREED AND DECLARED by and between parties hereto:

1. That it is expressly agreed and understood by and between the parties that this gift of land
will stand ipso facto revoked in the event the land hereunder given is not used for the purpose
of the intended school for which the same is given within a period of one year from the date
of these presents or in the alternative the said school is abolished or shifted elsewhere or
amalgamated with some other institution when and in all or any such event or events the land
with all buildings and structures, if any erected thereon, shall revert to and revest in the donor
or his heirs, executors, administrators and representatives and shall form part of his former
estate as if this deed of gift was never executed nor intended unless otherwise directed in an
appropriate action by court of competent jurisdiction.
2. That it is further agreed by and between the parties that in case the land is acquired by the
Government, the donee or his successors, including any person or persons managing the
school, shall invest the compensation money to be awarded in purchase of another land or
building to be used solely and exclusively for the school unless otherwise directed by any
court of competent jurisdiction.

THE SCHEDULE ABOVE REFERRED TO: DETAILS OF THE PROPERTY

All that piece and parcel of the land admeasuring 5000 Sq. mtrs. situate within registration
division and district Giridih sub-division and Taluka Bengabad.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the donor has executed this deed of a gift and delivered the same to
the donee who has also executed the same in token acceptance thereof on 20th November, 2023.

Signed, sealed and delivered by the DONOR and signed and sealed by the DONEE in token of
acceptance of gifts in presence of:

WITNESS:

1. SIGNATURE OF DONOR

29
2. SIGNATURE OF DONEE

30