Professional Documents
Culture Documents
John Exzel Paye - Activity #1 - Ba150
John Exzel Paye - Activity #1 - Ba150
ARTICLE REVIEW
“Moving beyond GDP to look at the world through the lens of wealth”
(https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/01/30/moving-beyond-gdp-to-look-at-the-world-t
hrough-the-lens-of-wealth)
● Use the link above as your basis in making your article review on “Moving
The World Bank Organization, "Moving beyond GDP to look at the world through the
lens of wealth." January 30, 2018.
II. INTRODUCTION: (State the Objective of the Article (goals or purpose), its domain/
topic area)
The goal of this article is to provide information about the economic status of countries
worldwide, including statistics and data comparisons over the last two decades. Its data
focuses primarily on the state of global wealth, the various sources of capital from high,
middle, and low-income countries, and its measured GDP. This article contributes to the
advancement of global wealth research by allowing future researchers to use this data
and improve the study that this article outlines.
IV. ANALYSIS: (State what has changed since the article was written? How do its lessons,
ideas, and theories still apply? To what extent have its issues been resolved?)
Many events have occurred in recent years that have had a significant impact on the
state of the economies of various countries and global wealth in general. The worsening
of global warming in recent years has had a significant impact on low-income countries
that rely heavily on natural capital, lowering the state of the economy and income in
those countries. The global pandemic has contributed to the decline of global wealth,
and the economies of high, middle, and low-income countries that rely on business,
labor, tourism, and infrastructure have suffered. However, the ideas and theories
presented in this article are still relevant today and can be used by researchers to further
the study of global wealth.
V. GENERAL CRITIQUE: (In this section one should state his/her opinions of how well
the authors presented and discussed the results including interpretations in the article. It
should contain both positive and negative comments with due justification.)