Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WRT 205 Misinformation
WRT 205 Misinformation
WRT 205 Misinformation
Professor Panthee
WRT 205
02 February 2024
Collaborative Writing
My group and I decided that the best argument to have in terms of technology, was to
speak about the harmful nature of misinformation. We bounced around a couple of ideas to make
our argument on, AI, plagiarism, and digital literacy, but eventually landed on the topic of
misinformation. The article that solidified our decision to write about misinformation was the
piece by Tawna Azar, speaking about Wikipedia. All of us were so invested in the topic and
realized how much misinformation we had given to us in modern media. As spoken in our
accurate and critical research, there is the possibility for misinformation the undermine what they
have done. We chose to direct it at both students and professors as these two are the ones who
encounter misinformation the most. The more in-depth reason for why we chose the professor
and students is because they are supposed to be the liaisons between knowledge and the written
report. The part that I enjoyed the most to teach those in the class was the fact that some of the
sources that we all use for writings, can be full of misinformation and lacking the truth. The
importance in revealing this for all my classmates is that for some research/argumentative
reports, it can be so easy to use misinformation in an official report causing the reputation of
The genre that we decided to use was a simple PowerPoint presentation. The reason we
decided to use this very basic and well-known genre, is because with a topic so complicated that
is misinformation, we want there to be a very simple way to look at it. In addition to the
simplicity that PowerPoint offers, the ability for us to mix in both design and words into the
same project, really brings forward the point in which we were trying to make. Some research
can easily be manipulated for one to pay attention more. We used a quote from myself on our
presentation to show that anyone can say anything. The way we demonstrated this was the quote
that we used, had little relevance of the actual topic of misinformation, but we worded and cut
out part of it in such a way, that it was able to sneak by everyone without a single question being
asked about its legitimacy, proving the foundation on what misinformation sits on. The group
project was different than the individual reports, as this was a compilation of all of our ideas,
rather than a singular thought. When we were doing the journal entries, we would all have a
separate opinion for each matter, but for the group segment, we all came to a consensus on what
we wanted to argue and agreed, for the most part, on what we wanted to bring forward. The skills
and knowledge that I learned from this group project differed from what I usually get out of a
group project. Rather than the normal, informational knowledge, and group learning, I learned
how to communicate effectively through email with my group members. Sometimes in a group
project, it is difficult to communicate if there is no exchange of information, and yet this time, I
was able to find their information and speak to them easily. It also showed me the importance of
a rough draft and how from the beginning, planning is the most useful tool for any presentation.
The actual information that I learned from the readings and journals was extremely interesting. I
never knew how much misinformation was present in media, and how reported and known it was
that it was there. The research process that I tried was new as well, as I used a more “flash
reading” style, where I skimmed the pages and only picked up on the vocabulary words. I was
able to read through much more content, and in turn, grasp a deeper understanding of what I was
reading, I believe this information and these skills will translate into my next assignment(s) and