Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group B
Group B
POLYTECHNIC, OWO.
AN ASSIGNMENT
PREPARE
GROUP B
LECTURER IN CHARGE
MR. AKINMOLADUN ADEYEMI
TABLE OF CONTENT
In private Sector:
i. Finding:- Comes from the owner, through loans, issuing shares or debentures
ii. Job security:- The job security is low as owner may die, debits may be
incurred and the reed for the business might run out, higher risks of
termination due to cost-cutting or non-performance.
iii. decisions:- are often made by small group of people, such as the board of
directors or top executives, They may consider input or ideas from
customers or employees but the final decision is made by few people at the
top.
iv. Ownership :- Private sector entities are owned and managed by private
individual or entities with no government interference.
v. Structure:- Is often flatter with fewer layers of management due to fewer
member in public sector.
In Public Sector
i. Finding:- Funded by tax prayer, duties, bonds and trasing bills through
government polities, government schools, government parks, government
hospital e.t.c.
ii. Job security:- There is job stability with low risk of termination due to non-
performance.
iii. decisions:- decision is made through a democratic process for example,
elected officials may make decisions based on public input and will of
people.
iv. Ownership :- public sectors are owned, controlled and managed by the
government.
v. Structure:- There is hierachial structure with many layer of management.
This is because public agencies tends to be large and complex with many
different departments and programs.
1. Theory focused on internal operations and did not focus on the external
environment. The external environment has a significant impact on an
organization. This include things like economic conditions government policies,
technological changes and social trends. Orgainzations need to be aware of the
external factors and adapt accordingly. This means that gullick’s theory was not a
complete picture of how organizations work in real world.
3. Theory did not account for the role of individuals and their behaviour in the
administration. He explained that in real world, organizations are made up of
individuals with their own unique personalities, motivations and bahaviours. The
gullicks theory focused on the organization as a whole and not considering people
within it, this can lead to a disconnect between the theory and the reality of how
organizations operate.
4. Theory did not consider the importance of values and ethics. He explained the
gullick’s theory did not fully consider the role of values and ethics in
administration. According to self values and ethics are an important part of any
organization and they should be taken into account when making decisions that
may be unethical.
5. Theory did not account for the political environment in which an organization
operates in real fact, organizations are constantly interacting with a rancty of
external stakeholders, including the government, the media and the general public.
These interactions can have a significant impact on an organizations ability to
achieve it’s goals. The gullicks theory however did not consider these external
factors and their impact on administration.
Five ways in which luther gullicks function was criticized.
Luther gullick
1. The critics agrued that gullick’s theory was too simplistic and did not take
account the complexities of modern organizations. i.e complex structures of
the government polities and government hierarchy.
2. Some critics also said that the functions were not applicable to all types of
organization for example, the way public organizations operates is different
from the of private administrations.
3. Some critic also argued that gullick’s theory did not account for the
importance of leadership and motivation in administration.
4. Some critic also argued that gullick’s theory were too focused on efficiency
and did not consider other factors such as effectiveness or equity.
5. Some critic that the functions were too focused on the technical aspects of
administration and did not consider the human aspects.