Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quản trị giá
Quản trị giá
A partnership is a legal arrangement where two or more parties, known as partners, agree to
cooperate to advance their mutual interests. The partners combine their resources, such as
money, skills, or property, to operate a business and share the profits and losses (LIT,
Cornell Law School).
Challenges regarding liability and legal standing:
Legal Position
Taxation
Life
Registration
Dissolution
Transferability of ownership interest varies, with LLCs generally offering more flexibility.
The dissolution process for corporations involves winding down operations, settling debts,
selling assets, and distributing remaining assets to owners
Consulting with legal or tax professionals can help determine the most suitable
option for specific needs.
II. Legal formation, management, and financing of different types of business organizations
2.1. Legal formation, management, and financing
2.1.1. Incorporate Organization
2.1.1.1. Sole proprietorship
The simplest form of business formation is the sole proprietorship, which requires minimal
registration with the government.
Select a business name that adheres to local regulations
Registration with the appropriate authorities is necessary
In a sole proprietorship, a single individual retains full ownership and control, making all
decisions regarding the business (Law Shelf, n.d.)
2.1.1.2. Partnership
Partners must be carefully selected based on shared vision, complementary skills, and
mutual trust.
A distinctive name for the partnership should be chosen, aligning with regulatory guidelines
and reflective of the business's identity.
The drafting of a comprehensive partnership agreement, encompassing key provisions such
as profit-sharing mechanisms, decision-making processes, and dispute-resolution
procedures, is imperative.
Adherence to tax regulations necessitates registration with the relevant tax authority,
ensuring compliance with fiscal obligations and securing any requisite licenses or
permits essential for lawful operation.
Management of an LLC is typically handled by its members, who can either directly
manage the LLC or appoint managers, offering greater flexibility compared to corporations
(Justia, 2024)
LLCs can obtain financing through various avenues, including member contributions, loans,
investments, and government-sponsored programs (Nolo, 2024)
2.1.2.4. Corporation
The appropriate business structure for the corporation must be chosen, considering factors
such as liability, taxation, and ownership.
The drafting of the Company Charter, also known as the Articles of Incorporation, is
imperative.
Holding a founding meeting is then necessary, during which shareholders and directors are
appointed, and the Company Charter is adopted.
Opening a bank account in the corporation's name follows suit, facilitating financial
transactions and management.
Obtaining the requisite business licenses and registrations from relevant authorities ensures
compliance with legal and regulatory standards.
Ongoing legal compliance, including tax filings, annual reports, and adherence to corporate
governance norms, is vital for the corporation's sustained operations within the bounds of
the law
Planning begins with the establishment of the Articles of Incorporation, setting the legal
foundation and strategic objectives.
The board then formulates long-term goals and devises a roadmap for their achievement.
Management planning breaks down these strategies into actionable plans across departments
like Marketing, Finance, and HR.
Organizational structure is vital, with a clear hierarchy ensuring accountability and efficient
functioning
Corporations have various sources of finance, including issuing stocks or bonds, obtaining
bank or commercial debt, reinvesting earnings, and raising capital through equity or debt
securities
Legal Compliance
- Structure:
+ Functional structure is divided into major divisions based on key products and services,
from iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Services to Wearables, Home, and Accessories
+ Board of Directors: Apple's corporate culture places a heavy emphasis on secrecy,
perfectionism, and a focus on innovation, creating a stressful but competitive work
environment.
+ Management structure is flat- a management model with few hierarchical layers, where
power and responsibility are widely distributed among employees rather than concentrated
in top-level management, with decentralized authority and an emphasis on operational
efficiency
- Managed:
Apple's management approach follows the Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling
(POLC) framework, contributing significantly to its success in the technology industry.
+ Planning: Visionary leadership under figures like Steve Jobs and Tim Cook, who provide
a clear direction for the company's future endeavors
+ Organizing: use functional structure that organizes employees into teams based on their
expertise related to specific products or services. Additionally, while decision-making is
centralized around key leaders like Tim Cook, there is also decentralization within
functional and regional teams, allowing for agility and responsiveness
Apple Inc. has gone through three stages of capital raising: (Jason D. O'Grady, 2008)
Self-sufficiency period (1976-1977)
- Advantages
Easy to Set Up
Full Control
Less Paperwork
- Disadvantages
Unlimited Liability
Limited Capital
- SWOT analysis
- Advantages:
Low Costs
- Disadvantages:
Unlimited liability
Lack of professionalism
- SWOT analysis:
- Advantages:
Limited Liability
- SWOT analysis:
+ Weaknesses (W): Tax Implications and Potential for Lower Retained Earnings
3.4. Corporation
- Advantages
Limited liability
- Disadvantages
Double taxation
- SWOT analysis:
- Advantages:
Centralized Decision-Making
Vertical Integration
- Disadvantages:
Limited Agility
- SWOT analysis:
+ Strengths (S):
+ Weaknesses (W):
+ Opportunities (O):
+ Threats (T):
Case 3: Guth v. Loft, Inc. (Supreme Court of Delaware, 23 Del.Ch. 255, 5 A.2d 503 (1939).
Charles Guth was the president of Loft, Inc., a candy and syrup manufacturer, which served a
cola drink at its fountain stores. Loft Inc's soda fountains purchased cola syrup from The
Coca-Cola Company, but Guth decided it would be cheaper to buy from Pepsi after Coke
declined to give him a larger jobber discount. Pepsi went bankrupt before Guth (and Loft
Inc.) could inquire about obtaining syrup from Pepsi.
Guth then personally bought the Pepsi company and its syrup recipe. With the aid of Loft Inc
chemists, he reformulated the recipe and soon purported to sell the syrup to Loft Inc.
He was sued by Loft Inc.'s shareholders, who alleged that he breached his fiduciary duty of
loyalty to the company by failing to offer that opportunity to Loft Inc., instead appropriating
it for himself.
IRAC analysis:
- Issue:
Breach of duty of loyalty: Did Guth breach his duty of loyalty to Loft by concealing
information about the Pepsi-Cola acquisition and using company assets for personal gain?
Ownership of the business opportunity: Who does the Pepsi-Cola business belong to: the
individual Guth or the Loft?
Use of Company Assets: Did Guth's use of Loft's assets to develop Pepsi-Cola violate the Use
of Assets Rule?
- Rule
+ Rules of loyalty:
Delaware General Corporation Law: Article 141(a) provides that executives and directors
have a duty to act "honestly, responsibly, and prudently" in the best interests of the public
company.
Require executives and directors to act in the best interests of the company and not to use
their positions for personal gain. Includes tools that can:
Duty to disclose: Disclose to the company any information about a business opportunity that
may benefit the company.
Avoid conflicts of interest: Avoid engaging in activities that could create a conflict of interest
between themselves and the company.
+ Opportunity rule:
Delaware General Corporation Law: Article 141(a) provides that the chief executive officer
and directors have a duty to "disclose to the corporation all information about business
opportunities that may present benefits for the company".
- Conclusion:
Guth committed a crime of loyalty to Loft by concealing information about the commercial
acquisition of Pepsi-Cola and using company assets for personal gain.
The Pepsi-Cola business belongs to Loft, not Guth personally.
Guth violated property use rules by using Loft's property for personal purposes.