Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writing BP
Writing BP
Plan: A Blueprint
511064
1
KEY QUESTIONS FOR A BUSINESS PLAN
Key questions
Source: McKinsey
2
KEY QUESTIONS FOR A BUSINESS PLAN (CONT.)
Key questions
Source: McKinsey
3
KEY QUESTIONS FOR A BUSINESS PLAN (CONT.)
Key questions
Business-model
• What is the future network structure?
organization and
• What organization and resources are needed?
processes
• What are the core business processes?
Source: McKinsey 4
AGENDA
5
Sample Business Plan for
Fast Fenners
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
The market for fenners has grown at a rapid rate since their introduction in 1985. Industry
revenues have grown from € 500 million in 1985 to € 7,000 million in 2000. Consumers have
shown almost insatiable demand for fenners and have consistently thrown away their old
fenners for new versions, as product features have been upgraded. This demand, combined
with other forces at work in the industry, make fenners a very attractive business opportunity.
Average industry profit margin has held firm at 15%
European Foars Company (EFC) is the nation's leading foar manufacturer. It has become the
industry benchmark for low-cost production processes and has established a strong brand
name, with EFC having become a household word. It has also established strong customer
relationships with the nation’s largest retail outlets
In recent years, market demand for fenners has flattened. In response, EFC began to
investigate the fenner market as a source of new profits to maintain its historical rate of return
to shareholders. After several years of R&D, EFC's engineers have developed and patented
the next generation of fenners known as 'fast fenners,' with features far surpassing existing
fenners. This business plan lays out EFC's strategy for entry into the fenner market with fast
fenners
EFC will begin selling fast fenners through the leading national retail outlets beginning in July
2001. Prior to this time, it will market the fast fenner aggressively to consumers, highlighting
its improved features and EFC's commitment to 24-hour customer service at the same price
as existing fenners. By offering consumers the fenner improvements and service that they
need at an economical price, EFC should be able to capture 62% of the market by the year
2005. EFC can realize up to € 1,130 million in annual profit by 2005 from successful
implementation of the fast fenner business plan
Source: McKinsey 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KEY ISSUES
1
Source: McKinsey 9
CONTENT EFC BUSINESS PLAN
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
10
SIZE OF FENNER MARKET
2
€ millions
11,000
CAGR
1985-2005 = 16.7% 7,000
4,000
2,000
500
16
15 15
14
12
Source: McKinsey
12
FENNER DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS, MAT* 1999
2
%
Superstores
15
55 Retail outlets
30
Catalogs
Basic 100 20 0
fenner
Improved 0 80 10
fenner
Even
better 0 0 90
fenner
Fast
fenner
Source: McKinsey
14
MARKET RESEARCH FINDINGS – POTENTIAL CUSTOMER NEEDS
2
%
% of population currently % of population liking their
owning fenners fenners
Own 85
75
Like
Source: McKinsey
16
WILLINGNESS TO SWITCH TO AN IMPROVED FENNER
2
% of respondents
95
90
60
40
10
5
Source: McKinsey
17
KEY FACTORS DRIVING CUSTOMER BUYING DECISION 2
Rating
0 Unimportant
Options 5 Important
5 Customer segment
Option lovers
4 Value seekers
Service seekers
3
... Price
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
1
5
Customer
service
Source: McKinsey
18
DEMOGRAPHICS OF TARGET CUSTOMER SEGMENTS
2
%
Demographics Option lovers Value seekers Service seekers
Age 20 - 30 10 35 20
30 - 40 20 30 40
40 - 50 40 25 30
> 50 30 10 10
Education High 30 20 40
level
Medium 50 40 30
Low 20 40 30
Buying Catalogs 10 50 10
behavior
Superstore 30 30 10
Retail 60 20 80
Source: McKinsey
19
FENNER INDUSTRY FORCES AT WORK
2
Fenner market is an
attractive business
opportunity
Source: McKinsey
20
MARKET SHARE OF FENNER COMPANIES, MAT* 1999
2
%
Years since
Current last fenner Innovation Capability
Company market share innovation expected to innovate
Source: McKinsey
22
COMPETITIVE POSITION EFC vs. COMPETITORS
2 High
Low
Skills Strategic assets Special relationship
EFC • Ability for low-cost • Fast fenner patent • Existing relationship
production • Well-established with some large
• Extensive experience brand name for foars national retailers
with foar production
Trinity • Cost leader in current • Patent for enhanced • Fenner retail chain
Fenners fenner production fenners
Source: McKinsey
23
SWOT ANALYSIS FOR EFC FENNERS’ FUTURE BUSINESS
2
Strengths Weaknesses
• Low-cost production capability • Currently no experience with
• Patent for faster fenner online selling
• Well-established brand name for • No own retail activities
foars • No relationship with medium-sized
supermarkets
EFC Fenner
Opportunities Business Threats
• Fast-growing market: CAGR • Competitive reaction to market
2000-2005: 9.5% entry of EFC, including possibility
• Profitable market: industry-wide of price war
ROS 2005: 15% • Competitors leveraging relation-
• Customers' openness to ship to existing distribution channel
innovation of fenners in the to block EFC's market entry
past: market share of even- • Fenner competitors attacking EFC
better fenners in 2000: 90% on its home territory with entry into
• Customers' willingness to switch the foar market
to fast fenners in the future: • Product innovation through Trinity
90% Fenners
Source: McKinsey
24
CONTENT EFC BUSINESS PLAN
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
25
FAST FENNERS VALUE PROPOSITION
3
Product
Customer need EFC value added
characteristics
Value proposition
A better product with more options and
an innovative styling at the same price
as regular fenners, plus 24-hour
customer service
Source: McKinsey
26
VALUE PROPOSITION TARGETED TO CUSTOMER SEGMENTS
3
Source: McKinsey
27
ESTIMATED CUSTOMER SEGMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2001-2005
3
'000 €
CAGR*, 2001-05
%
11,000 12
9,830
8,780 3.500 15
7,840 3.040
7,000 2.640
2.300
Option lovers 2.000
5.000 6
4.760
4.436
4.240
Value seekers 4.000
2.030 2.500 6
Service seekers 1.000 1.300 1.650
3,887
2.622 Value seekers 320
1.042
1,847 1.490
487
154 2.327 Service seekers 320
195 513 694
18 1.355
65 164 666
25
22 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Market share 6.9 6.3 21.0 39,5 61,7
%
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
30
DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL FOR EFC's FENNERS
4
Source: McKinsey
31
MARKETING CONCEPT
4
Price Product
• Pricing at level of even-better • Innovative product (fast fenners
fenners with many new options and
• Price transparency (e.g., enhanced performance)
recommended fast fenner • Additional 24-hour customer
selling price) service for all fast fenner
• One price concept for all customers
channels (in particular for
expansion into online offer)
Placement Promotion
• National retail outlets of big • Leverage of EFC‘s foar brand
supermarket chains only name for faster fenners
• Shelf placement in conjunction • Full leverage of foar advertising/
with foars promotion carry-over effect for
• Development of leading edge fenners
www platform with complete • Tailored promotion/
offering of virtual buying communication concept for
process and built-in flexibility* market entry phase
Initial
focus
Acquisition
Potential
Loyalty
CRM levers
Conquest
Source: McKinsey
33
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF EUROPEAN FENNER COMPANY
4
Proposed new
business unit
CEO
Head of
CFO COO
corp. center
Fast fenner
SBU
Systems
Sales and Customer
Manufacturing support/
marketing service
back office
Source: McKinsey
35
CORE PROCESSES – MANUFACTURING
4
Produce Package
Develop product Ship product
product product
Staffing 5 8 90
No. of FTEs
Source: McKinsey
38
CORE PROCESSES – SYSTEMS SUPPORT/BACK OFFICE
4
* Partly outsourced
Source: McKinsey
39
FAST FENNER BUSINESS UNIT STAFF POSITIONS
4
Information
R&D Major account
Sales reps technology (14)
specialists (2) reps (5)
(35)
Billing
Finance (2)
coordinators (4)
Source: McKinsey
40
PERSONNEL PLANNING IN FIRST FIVE YEARS
4
FTE
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
42
MANAGEMENT TEAM OF FAST FENNER SBU
5
Name Short CV
Head of fast Mark Tscherner • Has led Great Foar SBU for four years, overlooking the rapid
fenner SBU growth of the business unit
• Eight years of marketing with Nova with responsibility for $80
million revenues. Consultant with McLinsey, focusing on
consumer goods and venture capital investments
Stefan Fischer • Five years production manager at Trinity Fenner, successfully
SVP of launching the improved fenner version
manufacturing • Assistant product manager with responsibility for 30 employees
SVP of Jan Patterson • Three years of hands-on experience in back-office building for
systems/ e-price.com
back-office • Developing of C++ and Assembler software for ADS.com
• Independent C++ programmer and PhD degree in computing
from University of Sunderland
* Mobile telephones
Source: McKinsey
43
COMPENSATION SCHEMES FOR INTEGRATED BUSINESS UNIT 5
LAUNCHES Recent management Range of base salary*
searches (average)
€
• Mutual fund company 180,000 – 450,000
CEO/Head – € 350,000 base salary (342,000)
of SBU – 50%-60% annual bonus
– Executive stock option plan
(< 0.5% of stores)
• Consumer products company 130,000 – 290,000
SVP of – EURO 190,000 base salary (124,000)
manufacturing – 15%-25% bonus
– Small number of shares
SVP of customer
• Foar company 125,000 – 245,000
– 170,000 base salary (187,000)
services/systems – 10%-20% bonus
and back office – Small number of shares
Source: McKinsey
45
CONTENT EFC BUSINESS PLAN
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
46
OPTIONS FOR MARKET ENTRY CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED
6
Options Reason for rejections
Competitive • Don't patent fast fenner in order • Patent lasts 15 years and
response to get to market quicker innovations are difficult to copy
• Cut price to preempt • Fenner competitors historically
competitive entry do not have capability to
successfully innovate
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
48
DEVELOPMENT OF KEY FINANCIALS, 2001-2005
7
BASE CASE
Revenue EBIT
€ millions 1,162
6,785 € millions
1,847
65 -144 -51
Source: McKinsey
49
FIVE-YEAR PROJECTION OF PROFIT AND LOSS STATEMENT 7
BASE CASE
€ millions
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Revenue 65 513 1,847 3,887 6,785
Source: McKinsey
50
FIVE-YEAR PROJECTION OF CASH FLOW STATEMENT BASE CASE
7
€ millions
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Cash year in 0 4 33 31 236
Sources of cash
Net income: -147 -121 -63 361 793
+ Depreciation (amortization) 8 12 19 85 103
Increase/decrease in
+ Trade and other payables 8 16 23 36 49
+ Employee benefit liabilities 5 3 6 8 9
+ Deferred tax liabilities 0 0 0 1 84
+ Long-term debt and loans 50 80 50 0 0
Total sources of cash -76 -10 +35 491 1,038
Use of cash
Increase/decrease in:
Trade and other receivables 14 54 62 156 227
+ Inventories 38 12 24 83 155
+ Fixed assets 3 8 12 12 12
+ Interest 15 3 16 35 48
Total use of cash 70 77 114 286 442
Increase/decrease in cash -146 -87 -79 205 596
+ Financing (increase of equity) 150 120 110 0 0
Cash years out 4 33 31 236 832
Source: McKinsey
51
FIVE-YEAR PROJECTION OF BALANCE SHEET – ASSETS 7
BASE CASE
€ millions
Fixed assets
Gross value 54 101 152 279 509
– Accumulated depreciation 8 20 39 124 227
Total fixed assets 46 81 113 155 282
Source: McKinsey
52
FIVE-YEAR PROJECTION BALANCE SHEET – LIABILITIES 7
BASE CASE
AND EQUITY
€ millions
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 8 24 47 83 132
+ Employee benefit liabilities 5 8 14 22 31
+ Deferred tax liabilities 0 0 0 1 85
Total current liabilities 13 32 61 106 248
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt and loans 50 130 180 180 180
Total long-term liabilities 50 130 180 180 180
Total liabilities 63 162 241 286 428
Equity
Share capital 150 270 380 380 380
+ Retained earnings -132 -249 -271 85 936
Total equity 18 21 109 465 1,316
Total liabilities and equity 81 183 299 751 1,744
Source: McKinsey
53
PROJECTION OF EBIT, ROS, AND RONA, 2001-2005 7
BASE CASE
1,162
EBIT
€ millions
378
-22
RONA
-222 50 67
%
-17
-62
-178
Source: McKinsey
54
BUSINESS EVALUATION THROUGH DCF* METHOD 7
8,938
€ millions
1,162 BASE CASE
NPV of
free cash
378 flows is
€ 4,653
million
-51
-144 -113
Residual
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 value**
Discounting
rate 30 27 24 21 18 15.5
%
• Development as expected
Base case
Source: McKinsey
56
COMPARISON OF EBIT, ROS, AND RONA BETWEEN CASES, 2005 7
EBIT 2,014
€ millions 1,162
512
24
ROS 17
%
5
85
67
RONA
% 32
Source: McKinsey 57
BUSINESS EVALUATION THROUGH WEIGHTING CASES 7
DCF Probability
€ millions %
Value of
Worst case EFC's fast
-138 20
fenner SBU
€4,008
million
Best case 6,221 20
Source: McKinsey 58
CONTENT EFC BUSINESS PLAN
1 Executive summary
5 Management team
59
IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN AND TIMELINE, 2001
8
Month
Activity J F M A M J J A S O N D
• Start up customer
service phone center
• Send out account reps
• Follow up surveys with
early customers
• Fine-tune product
Source: McKinsey 60