question? What made it a strong/weak introduction? 2. Is there a range of arguments and are these consistently developed/explained? 3. Which points were strong and what made them good points? 4. Which points could have been improved and how? 5. Was there analysis and evaluation? If so, at which parts of the essay? 6. Was the conclusion strong or weak? What made it good or if not, how could it have been improved? 7. Did the essay have a structure? What features contributed to its structure? 8. Was the vocabulary varied? Give examples of successful/unsuccessful uses of vocabulary/expression. 9. Was there consistent control of grammar and expression? If not, what were the weak spots? 10. How was the register? 11. What was the strongest element of this essay? 12. What was the weakest element of this essay?