Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Science of the Total Environment


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv

In situ forming dialdehyde xanthan gum-gelatin Schiff-base hydrogels as


potent controlled release fertilizers

Subhraseema Das a, , Ganeswar Dalei b
a
Department of Chemistry, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack 753003, Odisha, India
b
Department of Chemistry, Odisha University of Technology and Research, Bhubaneswar 751029, Odisha, India

H I G H L I G H T S G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T

• In situ forming gelatin-dialdehyde xanthan


gum Schiff-base hydrogel is potent CRF.
• Good water-retention behaviour in soil,
biodegradability and reusability
• Urea release mechanism indicated crucial
role of macromolecular relaxation.
• Phytotoxicity assay indicated nontoxicity
of hydrogel.
• Growth assay on Okra plants suggested
the hydrogel as good soil conditioner.

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Editor: Baoliang Chen Controlled release fertilizer (CRF) hydrogels have blossomed into promising materials in agriculture owing to the sus-
tained release of the fertilizer and also as soil conditioner. Apart from the traditional CRF hydrogels; Schiff-base
Keywords: hydrogels have garnered significant thrust that release nitrogen slowly in addition to reducing the environmental pol-
Dialdehyde xanthan gum lution. Herein, we have fabricated Schiff-base CRF hydrogels composed of dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG) and gel-
Schiff-base hydrogel
atin. The formation of the hydrogels was accomplished via the simplistic in situ crosslinking reaction between the
Controlled release fertilizer
aldehyde groups of DAXG and the amino groups of gelatin. The hydrogels acquired a compact network upon increasing
the DAXG content in the matrix. The phytotoxic assay on different plants indicated the hydrogels to be nontoxic. The
hydrogels demonstrated good water-retention behaviour in soil, along with reusability even after 5 cycles. A controlled
release profile for urea was evident from the hydrogels wherein macromolecular relaxation played a crucial role in the
release mechanism. Growth assays on Abelmoschus esculentus (Okra) plant presented an intuitive evaluation on the
growth and water-holding capacity of the CRF hydrogel. The present work demonstrated a facile preparation of CRF
hydrogels to enhance the utilization of urea and retain soil humidity as fertilizer carriers.

1. Introduction temperature and water resources which has invariably impacted the crop
yield (Fenu and Malloci, 2020). Thus, utilization of fertilizers for higher
Owing to rapid increase in population, industrialization, urbanization, crop yield has become an inevitable practice. Current data assesses that
desertification and land degradation; the area of arable land per capita is 2.50 × 106 tons of fertilizer per year will be required to cater to the global
plummeting at an alarming rate (Azeem et al., 2014; Klimczyk et al., food demand (Chen et al., 2021). Among the lot; nitrogen-based fertilizers
2021). Besides, climate change has brought in major alterations in the and urea, to be precise, is the most effective and basic nutrient for plant
growth and need for protein production (Arafa et al., 2022). About
⁎ Corresponding author. 73.4 % of all nitrogen-based fertilizers used for agricultural purposes uni-
E-mail address: subhraseema@ravenshawuniversity.ac.in (S. Das). versally is in the form of urea (Roberts, 2009; Sutton et al., 2011; Gao

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162660
Received 9 December 2022; Received in revised form 6 February 2023; Accepted 2 March 2023
Available online 7 March 2023
0048-9697/© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

et al., 2021). However, approximately 20–70 % of the nitrogen applied to acrylamide which is neurotoxic and carcinogenic and pollutes the soil and
the agricultural field in the conventional form of urea discharges to the at- food. Hence, natural polymers based hydrogels have blossomed into viable
mosphere either by nitrogen leaching or NH3 volatilization (Naz and alternatives; being environmentally benevolent, biodegradable and non-
Sulaiman, 2016; Jia et al., 2020). Also, the oxidation of NH3 produces toxic in nature (McClements, 2017; Mishra et al., 2018; Ramli, 2019; Di
NO2 and NO3 (Krajewska, 2009; Ghobashy et al., 2021a) and these forms Martino et al., 2021). Of late, such hydrogel systems have gained promi-
of N have deleterious effects on soil, groundwater, and atmosphere through nence as CRF hydrogels since they can regulate the plant nutrients and
leaching, runoff, and volatilization processes (Drecht et al., 2003; Galloway water as a single material (Liang et al., 2009). Their high water and nutrient
et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2021). It has also been reported that N2O emissions holding ability have aptly rendered them the title of “mini reservoirs”
from such processes contribute to a greater extent in global warming than (Raafat et al., 2012; Saruchi et al., 2014). A clear analysis on different
CO2 emissions (Ghobashy et al., 2021a) Moreover, the ammonium in soil types and generation of CRF hydrogels has been thoroughly reviewed by
is replaced by cations like Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+ which may be received Fu and co-workers (Fu et al., 2018). The authors have pointed that fourth
by plants resulting in the discharge of hydrogen ions, thereby enhancing type/generation of “Schiff-base hydrogels/complexes” are budding mate-
soil acidification (Huang and Xu, 2010; Taiz and Zeiger, 2010; Gao et al., rials that could pave the path forward towards design and optimization of
2021). Therefore, it is of utmost importance to regulate soil pollution by effectual CRFs (Fu et al., 2018). Schiff-base hydrogels accomplished by
controlled release of N (Ghobashy, 2020; Ghobashy et al., 2021a). dialdehyde crosslinking with amine-group containing polymers have ren-
Now-a-days, it is a great challenge for the utilization of high efficiency dered to be a facile and economical strategy by polymer researchers. A
fertilizers to curb environmental pollution due to overuse of fertilizers for handful of literature are available for the controlled release of urea from
attaining high crop yields. In this regard, controlled release fertilizers such Schiff-base hydrogels (Iftime et al., 2019; Kiran et al., 2019).
(CRFs) have evolved as prominent candidates in agriculture as they are In this context, xanthan gum (XG), a microbial polysaccharide, has gar-
bestowed with noble attributes such as reducing the fertilizer dose, improv- nered substantial interest. XG finds immense utilities in health, energy and
ing nitrogen consumption, saving irrigational water usage and maintaining environmental applications owing to its biocompatibility, stability in high
a valid supply period (Babar et al., 2014; Pang et al., 2019). Also, the CRFs pH and nontoxicity (Jena et al., 2022). Lately, dialdehyde xanthan gum
are believed to promote crop yields, in addition to reducing the environ- (DAXG), accomplished by periodate oxidation of XG, has validated its can-
mental pollution inherently accompanied by the nitrogenous emissions didature in food packaging (Ge et al., 2017), pharmaceutical packaging (Ge
from conventional fertilizers (Azeem et al., 2014). These CRFs set a physical et al., 2018a), adhesive (Paiva et al., 2016) and wound dressing (Ge et al.,
blockade around the urea molecule which reduces the dissolution rate of 2018b) material. As verified from different reports; DAXG has overwhelm-
urea and modulates its slow release to the crop fields (Guo et al., 2005). ing attributes such as enhanced water resistance, reduced hydrophilicity,
A panoply of methods have been developed for the construction of CRFs thermal, light barrier mechanical and good crosslinking properties (Ge
which includes deposition on organic/inorganic functional materials, et al., 2015; Paiva et al., 2016; Ngwabebhoh et al., 2021). However, till
coating with polymers, encapsulation in matrices, copolymerization etc. date, no work has been conducted on DAXG based Schiff-base hydrogels
(Naz and Sulaiman, 2016; Yang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2010; Iftime as CRFs.
et al., 2019). Keeping this in mind, we have developed a Schiff-base hydrogel com-
Polymeric materials, and mainly hydrogels, have been profoundly used posed of DAXG and gelatin (GT) for controlled release of urea for agricul-
as soil conditioners in agriculture (Ghobashy et al., 2018; Song et al., 2020; tural purposes (Scheme 1). GT is a biocompatible, biodegradable polymer
Di Martino et al., 2021; Ghobashy et al., 2021b) The most commonly used present in the skin of pigs, cattle, and fish (Rigueto et al., 2021). The poly-
hydrogels for CRFs are polyacrylamide (PAAm) and acrylate derivatives morphic structure of a GT molecule contains an amino, hydroxyl and
which, however are not completely biodegradable and thus, contaminate carboxyl group; thus rendering it prominent in food industries, biomedicine
the soil (Aviv et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015; Di Martino et al., 2021). Al- and environmental applications as an efficient adsorbent (Rigueto et al.,
though, PAAm is not toxic, its formulations may have little amounts of 2021). The Schiff-base hydrogels composed of GT and DAXG were

Scheme 1. Schematic representation of synthesis of gelatin (GT)-dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG) Schiff-base hydrogels (GD) as urea controlled release fertilizers (CRFs) in
agriculture.

2
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

synthesized via the in situ crosslinking reaction between amino groups of GT immersed in water at 25 °C until equilibrium and the swollen weight was
and aldehyde groups of DAXG. The hydrogels were characterized by differ- then measured. The average data has been presented from three readings.
ent spectroscopic techniques and their urea release behaviour has been in-
vestigated in soil. The mechanism of urea release from the hydrogels was 2.6. Water-retention studies in soil
addressed from kinetic fitting parameters. To assess the phytotoxicity of
the hydrogels, visual assessment was conducted to detect any damage to The water-retention behaviour of the designed hydrogels was appraised
garlic, beans and okra plants at the seedlings stage. The efficacy of the from the reported procedure (Shen et al., 2020). 2 g hydrogel was thor-
hydrogels towards controlled release of urea was further evaluated from oughly mixed with the 100 g dried soil taken in a container and 50 mL
the plant growth experiment by comparing the growth with our designed water was added to the blend. A container having the same soil and no
hydrogels and commercially available urea. Finally, the reusability and bio- hydrogel served as the control. The hydrogels were weighed every alternate
degradability of the hydrogels were estimated. Thus, this research work days until equilibrium. The final data have been averaged from five
represents a simplistic method for the synthesis of eco-friendly systems readings.
for CRFs.
2.7. Biodegradation test
2. Experimental
For the biodegradation assay, appropriately weighed GD hydrogels
2.1. Materials (2 cm × 2 cm) were buried 15 cm under the top soil (garden soil collected
from Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India) and watered alternate days. At
Xanthan gum (XG), gelatin (from fish skin) and Ehrlich reagent were specified intervals, the samples were taken out, washed with distilled water
procured from Sigma-Aldrich, India and used as received. Sodium and dried to constant weight. The biodegradability was inferred by measur-
periodate was obtained from Merck India Ltd. and used as such. Urea was ing the weight loss of each sample. The reported data have been averaged
obtained from HiMedia India. All other reagents were of highest grade pu- from five readings.
rity and obtained from Merck India Ltd. and HiMedia (India).
2.8. Urea release behaviour and kinetics
2.2. Synthesis of DAXG
Urea release property of the designed Schiff-base hydrogels was simul-
Dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG) was synthesized by microwave irradi- taneously investigated in water and soil. The amount of released urea was
ation method. Briefly, the mixture of XG powder (1 g) and 10 mL of determined in a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Cary UV-100, Agilent) based
periodate solution (0.075 g/mL) was subjected to microwave irradiation on the well-known Ehrlich reaction (Wen et al., 2016; Leon et al., 2018).
(UWave-1000 Sineo Microwave) at a power of 300 W for 4 min at 90 °C. For the release studies in distilled water, the urea-loaded GD hydrogels
The product (DAXG) was washed with water and dried for further studies. were immersed in water and 3 mL aliquot of solution was withdrawn
The aldehyde content of DAXG was assessed as reported by Guo and co- every 1 h and assessed by the spectrophotometric method. To the 3 mL
workers (Guo et al., 2014). aliquot, Ehrlich reagent (3 mL) was added, the solution was appropri-
ately diluted and shook gently. The dimethylaminobenzaldehyde
2.3. Synthesis of Schiff-base hydrogel gradually reacted with the urea and produced a bright yellow color com-
plex that was proportional to urea concentration. The absorbance values
1 g gelatin (GT) powder was dissolved in 15 mL of water. Then, DAXG were compared with the standard calibration curve spectrophotometri-
solution was added to the GT solution and mechanically agitated to ensure cally at λ ₌ 430 nm. Each test was performed in triplicate and the mean
homogenization. The obtained mixture solution was evenly poured in petri data presented.
dish. The solutions were frozen at −50 °C for 8 h and subsequently lyoph- For release studies in soil; the hydrogels (∼1 g) were enclosed in a
ilized for 48 h in a Biobase Freeze Dryer. Different grades of hydrogels were nylon screen (10 mesh screen cloth) and embedded 15 cm away from top
synthesized by varying the content of GT to DAXG in the ratio (wt%) 1:1, soil wrapped in a vessel (polypropylene pots of 30 cm internal diameter
1:2 1:3, 1:4, 1:5 and designated as GD1, GD2, GD3, GD4, GD5 respectively. and 20 cm height) with 500 g soil. The pots were equipped with filter
The yield (%) of the reaction was estimated by the gravimetric method as paper No. 5 at the bottom. The moisture content of the soil was regulated
reported (Ozay et al., 2021) and found to be 89.91, 90.12, 89.9, 89.77, at 30 % and the container was stored at room temperature. Water
90.04 % for the formation of GD1, GD2, GD3, GD4, GD5 hydrogels respec- (100 mL) was added slowly at pre-determined intervals and the leachate
tively. The incorporation of urea onto the hydrogels was carried out in situ. was then centrifuged to separate sandy soil particles from water (Vudjung
Prior to casting, urea (1 g) was added to the solution and stirred briefly. The and Saengsuwan, 2018). The urea release was evaluated by UV–Vis method
urea-loaded GD gel solutions were lyophilized in similar manner as de- described above.
scribed above. The kinetics of urea release in water and soil was addressed by fitting
the release data to four basic mathematical models namely Higuchi,
2.4. Characterization Ritger-Peppas, Peppas-Sahlin and Zero-order (Serra et al., 2006).

The gelation times of the hydrogels were noted as per previous literature 2.9. Plant growth assessment
(Zhou et al., 2008). The FTIR spectra of the hydrogels were recorded in
Thermo Nicolet iS5 spectrophotometer in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 by The phytotoxicity of the hydrogels was performed in accordance with
the solid KBr pellet method. Carl Zeiss-Gemini FESEM 300 was used for OECD 208 method, using 1 g of dry hydrogel per kg of soil. The OECD
morphological examination of the hydrogels. The average pore size of the 208 method is generally used to confirm that biodegraded materials do
hydrogels was estimated by random selection of several pores from the not induce any toxic components into the soil (Chen and Chen, 2019).
FESEM images using ImageJ software. TGA of the specimens was studied Three different plants, namely garlic, beans and okra, were used for the as-
in NETZSCH STA 449F3 from ambient to 900 °C in nitrogen atmosphere. sessment of toxicity. The plant growth testing and harvesting was estimated
as per reported method (Chen and Chen, 2019).
2.5. Swelling behaviour To assess the impact of controlled release of urea from the GD
hydrogels, pot culture experiments were carried out. Three plant chambers
The swelling capacity of the hydrogels was evaluated by the weighing containing 1 kg of soil in each and 5 g of urea-loaded hydrogel and commer-
method (Shen et al., 2020). Dried and pre-weighed GD hydrogels were cially available urea were placed at 25 ± 2 °C in well lighting and

3
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

ventilation conditions. Abelmoschus esculentus (Okra) plants having approx- the appearance of new peak at 1735 cm−1 ascribed to the C_O stretching
imately same size were planted 5 cm from the soil surface and watered vibration represents the dialdehyde groups of DAXG. Such an observation
every two/three days interval to maintain the water availability. After the has been reported earlier in the study by Ngwabebhoh and team
plants yielded the fruits, they were stopped watering and the plant growth (Ngwabebhoh et al., 2021). Also, we could observe the appearance of an in-
index was observed in the drought condition to gauge the role of the CRF as tense band in the region 750 cm−1. This was attributed to the C\\H out of
soil conditioner. plane bending arising from the formation of hemiacetal and/or hydrated
bonds between aldehyde and hydroxyl groups (Kim et al., 2000). In addi-
2.10. Chlorophyll content tion, sharper peak around 1038 cm−1 owing to C\\O\\C stretching was
witnessed in DAXG as a result of hydration of aldehydes (Ragothaman
Since photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b et al., 2014). Thus, the FTIR analyses indicated the successful accomplish-
are vital parameters for plant growth; we have estimated the aforemen- ment of DAXG by periodate oxidation of XG.
tioned content from different leaves of the plant of our study by UV–Vis
spectrophotometry (Lichtenthaler and Wellburn, 1983; Kumaraswamy 3.2. Formation of Schiff-base GD hydrogel
et al., 2021). Briefly, 0.2 g leaf samples were hand homogenized in 20 mL
of 100 % acetone and then filtered. The absorbance was read at 663 nm The plausible scheme of hydrogel formation between DAXG and GT is
and 646 nm implying the quantification of chlorophyll a and b respectively. shown in Fig. 2A. The formation of GD hydrogel occurred via the Schiff-
Data have been presented as mean of five replicates ±SD. base reaction between the amino group of GT and aldehyde group of
DAXG, which was confirmed from FTIR spectroscopy (Fig. 2B). The FTIR
2.11. Reusability test spectrum of pure GT showed peaks at 3440 cm−1 ascribed to N\\H
stretching of secondary amide, C_O stretching at 1670 cm−1, N\\H bend-
The reusability tests of the hydrogels were carried out in distilled water ing between 1550 and 1500 cm−1, and C\\H stretching at 2963 cm−1. The
as per the procedure in Section 2.5. After the first test, the hydrogel was Schiff-base formation was ascertained from the spectra of the GD hydrogels
dried in an oven at 50 °C and reused. This process was performed for five that revealed a peak at 1635 cm−1, which is attributed to the imine bond
runs (Mohammadbagheri et al., 2021). formed due to C_N linkages between GT and DAXG (Iftime et al., 2017).
Moreover, modification of the broad band from 3500 to 3000 cm−1 attrib-
3. Results and discussion uted to the overlapped stretching bands of the O\\H and N\\H bonds and
the intra- and inter-molecular H-bonds are also suggestive of the imine link-
3.1. Synthesis of DAXG ages in the GD hydrogels (Iftime et al., 2017; Iftime et al., 2019). It could
further be observed that with increasing dialdehyde content in the
The periodate oxidation of polysaccharides introduces selective hydrogels, the bands in this particular domain gradually shift to higher
cleavage of C\\C bond between vicinal hydroxyl group of the anhydro-D- wavenumbers (3417 in GD1; 3435 in GD2; 3438 in GD3; 3440 in GD4;
glucopyranose residues, resulting in the formation of ring opening 3442 cm−1 in GD5). Such an observation could be ascribed to the forma-
dialdehyde products. In our study, XG was oxidized by periodate to pro- tion of imine units inducing a tighter packing in the hydrogel matrix
duce corresponding dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG) (Fig. 1A). The for- (Iftime et al., 2017). Thus, the FTIR spectral data recommended the
mation of DAXG was affirmed from FTIR data. The yield % and the Schiff-base formation of GD hydrogels and formation of a rigid matrix
degree of oxidation was evaluated and found to be 96 % and 46 % with an increased crosslinking efficiency of GD5 hydrogel.
respectively.
The FTIR spectra of XG and DAXG were presented in Fig. 1B. The peaks 3.3. Gelation of GD hydrogels
at 1000–1240 cm−1 indicates (CO and C\\O\\C stretching), 1410 cm−1
(OH bending), 2925 cm−1 (CH vibrations) and 3000–3600 cm−1 (OH The gelation time is a significant factor which is defined as the time re-
stretching) was witnessed in both the spectra of XG and DAXG. However, quired for the in situ crosslinking of the hydrogel. Fig. 3A displays the digital

Fig. 1. The periodate oxidation of xanthan gum (XG) to dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG). (A) Schematic reaction and (B) FTIR spectral depiction.

4
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Fig. 2. (A) In situ crosslinking reaction of gelatin (GT) and dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG) forming GD hydrogel via Schiff-base reaction and (B) FTIR spectra of GT, DAXG
and the GD hydrogels.

photographs of gelation for the GD hydrogels respectively. As depicted in could be explained by the differences in the DAXG content in the hydrogels,
Fig. 3B, the gelation time of the hydrogels has significantly decreased which greatly influenced the crosslinking reaction rate and subsequently
with an increase in the DAXG content. This difference in gelation times reduced the gelation time.

Fig. 3. The gelation of GD hydrogels. (A) Photographs and (B) time plots of GD hydrogels (***p < 0.001).

5
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

3.4. TGA of GD hydrogels DAXG, being a macromolecule, creates more crosslinks rendering a denser
matrix in GD5 hydrogel.
Fig. 4 elucidates the TG curves of gelatin (GT), dialdehyde xanthan gum
(DAXG), neat urea, urea-loaded GD5 hydrogel and GD1, GD5 hydrogels 3.6. Swelling behaviour of hydrogels
from ambient temperature to 950 °C. As witnessed for GT, DAXG, GD1,
GD5 and GD5-urea hydrogels, the TGA curves displayed three mass loss re- Swelling is one of the most important parameters that impacts the per-
gions. The first stage of weight loss in the region 25 °C–150 °C indicates the formance of CRFs. The swelling of the GD hydrogels was evaluated in dis-
loss of free water. The second stage of weight loss was observed in the range tilled water at 25 °C and the profiles are illustrated in Fig. 6A. It could be
of 250 °C–300 °C which is likely associated with the decomposition of the clearly witnessed that the GD5 hydrogel displayed the lowest swelling
polymer composite. The weight loss region around T > 400 °C could be ratio among all the synthesized hydrogels. While the equilibrium swelling
accredited to the carbonaceous residues originating due to polymer degra- percent of GD1 hydrogel reached 2500 after 24 h, there was almost a 2.5
dation (Mishra et al., 2011). As seen, the TG curve of GD1 showed a slight times reduction for GD5 hydrogel. This observation puts forth that as
improvement in thermal stability in comparison to individual GT and DAXG content was increased, the swelling ratio of the hydrogels was
DAXG likely due to formation of Schiff-base hydrogel. More so, the pres- lowered substantially. Such an observation could be justified considering
ence of enhanced crosslinking in GD5 hydrogel rendered an enhanced ther- the tighter packing and compact matrix in GD5 hydrogel. The swelling
mal stability with respect to GD1 hydrogel. Similar improvement in thermal data further corroborates with our FTIR spectral data, the lower gelation
stability has been reported for Schiff-base hydrogels wherein the Schiff- times and denser morphology of GD5 hydrogel as studied earlier.
base bonds were attributed for the same (Nezhad-Mokhtari et al., 2021;
Dalei et al., 2023). The TGA curve of neat urea is consistent with literature 3.7. Water-retention property of hydrogels
report (Jones and Rollinson, 2013). For the urea-loaded GD5 hydrogel, an
enhancement in thermal stability is clearly evident in comparison to GD1 One of the crucial features of a material designed as CRF is its water-
and GD5 hydrogels. The findings suggested that GD5-urea hydrogel was retention ability in soil. In parched areas, this property could be exploited
thermally stable and could be a good candidate for CRF in agriculture. for the slow release of the trapped water to aid crop growth. As evident
from Fig. 6B, the water-retention rate of the soil devoid of GD5 hydrogel
3.5. Morphology of hydrogels presented a total water loss by the 8th day. In contrast, the water-
retention rate of the soil endowed with GD5 hydrogel was prolonged to
In this study, the influence of different content of DAXG on the hydrogel the 14th day. This study proved that the synthesized GD5 hydrogel was ef-
microstructure was morphologically studied by FESEM. Fig. 5A illustrates fective in retention of soil-moisture and could be used as soil conditioner for
the FESEM images of GD hydrogels. Although an inter-connected porous agriculture purposes in arid/ semi-arid areas.
network structure was revealed by all the prepared samples; the pore
sizes varied. Quantification of the pore sizes for the hydrogels (Fig. 5B) 3.8. Urea release and kinetics
projected that an increase in DAXG content in the hydrogel led to a reduc-
tion in the hydrogel porosity. As the DAXG content was increased in the 3.8.1. Urea release behaviour in water and soil
hydrogels, a rather compact network structure with smaller pores was rec- The cumulative release rates of neat urea and urea-loaded GD hydrogels
ognized. The average pore size for GD1 hydrogel was found to be 58.658 ± in distilled water and soil have been projected in Fig. 7A and B respectively.
19.17 μm while that for GD5 revealed a 1.4 times diminution to 42.602 ± From Fig. 7A, it was evident that the cumulative release of urea was faster
16.03 μm. Basically, the presence crosslinking influenced the porosity of than the urea-loaded GD hydrogels. The release rates of urea from the GD
the hydrogel by forming higher network entanglements. In our case; hydrogels obviously decreased, with GD5 hydrogel displaying the slowest

Fig. 4. TGA curves of gelatin (GT), dialdehyde xanthan gum (DAXG), urea, GD1 hydrogel, GD5 hydrogel and urea-loaded GD5 hydrogel.

6
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Fig. 5. The morphology of GD hydrogels. (A) FESEM images (Scale bar 100 μm) and (B) average pore size distribution histograms of GD1, GD2, GD3, GD4 and GD5 hydrogels.

release among all. Similar pattern of urea release was also witnessed in the than that in distilled water medium. Such an observation could be largely
soil study (Fig. 7B). However, there was pronounced difference in the re- attributed to the reduction in the dynamic exchange rate of water and
lease rates of urea in soil and in water. It could be clearly witnessed that CRF (urea-loaded hydrogels) because of the decreased amount of urea dif-
the cumulative rates of urea release in soil was significantly prolonged fusion in the soil environment. The urea release from GD5 hydrogel in soil

7
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Fig. 6. (A) Swelling behaviour of GD hydrogels and (B) Water-retention behaviour of soil with and without GD5 hydrogel.

was stabilized upto a period extending for >30 days which suggested its 3.8.2. Urea release mechanism analysis
high potency as a CRF. From the observations in Sections 3.5 and 3.6; the Four basic release kinetic models namely the Higuchi model, the Ritger-
GD5 hydrogel displayed the lowest water absorbency and endowed with Peppas model, the Peppas-Sahlin model and Zero-order model were
a compact matrix; the diffusion of urea molecules from this hydrogel to adopted to address the preliminary kinetics of urea release in water and
the soil was greatly lowered in comparison to other specimens. soil. The results of the fittings of the release data have been presented in

Fig. 7. Urea release and the kinetics of its release from GD hydrogels. The release profiles of urea in (A) distilled water and (B) soil. (C) Plot of ratio of polymer relaxation to
Fickian diffusion (R/F) contribution to the mechanism of urea release from GD5 hydrogel in water and in soil by fitting to Peppas-Sahlin equation.

8
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Table 1
Kinetic and fitting parameters for urea release from GD hydrogels in water and soil.
Models Higuchi Ritger Peppas Peppas-Sahlin Zero-Order
Samples kH R2 n kRP R2 k1 k2 R2 k0 R2
GD1 (water) 0.283 0.772 0.89 0.234 0.996 0.005 0.242 0.996 0.237 0.996
GD1 (soil) 0.202 0.804 1.01 0.103 0.993 0.000 0.104 0.993 0.105 0.993
GD2 (water) 0.259 0.867 0.73 0.199 0.949 0.074 0.124 0.941 0.137 0.883
GD2 (soil) 0.169 0.718 1.28 0.059 0.988 0.060 0.119 0.982 0.089 0.964
GD3 (water) 0.184 0.865 0.83 0.125 0.999 0.052 0.072 0.999 0.099 0.981
GD3 (soil) 0.144 0.777 1.10 0.045 0.995 0.020 0.063 0.994 0.056 0.991
GD4 (water) 0.167 0.863 0.90 0.086 0.996 0.028 0.061 0.997 0.072 0.982
GD4 (soil) 0.118 0.752 1.18 0.032 0.994 0.028 0.056 0.990 0.046 0.982
GD5 (water) 0.147 0.888 0.88 0.070 0.999 0.027 0.045 0.999 0.055 0.983
GD5 (soil) 0.104 0.750 1.18 0.019 0.996 0.029 0.039 0.994 0.031 0.984

kH: Higuchi rate constant; n: diffusion exponent; kRP: Ritger-Peppas rate constant; k1: Fickian diffusion
rate constant; k2: Relaxation rate constant; k0: Zero-order rate constant; R2: fitting parameter.

Table 1. The Higuchi model is associated with the Fickian diffusion of the into the hydrogel matrix owing to the osmotic pressure gradient, followed
molecule from the hydrogel matrix. From the Ritger-Peppas equation, the by relaxation and swelling of matrix. To further impound the influence of dif-
term ‘n’ is referred to as the diffusional exponent which describes the trans- fusion and relaxation on the release mechanism; the data was fit to Peppas-
port mechanism. n = 0.5 implies Fickian diffusion occurring due to molecu- Sahlin equation which accounts for the coupled effects of Fickian diffusion
lar diffusion. When n = 1, case II transport occurs. When n lies between 0.5 and case II transport whence k1 denotes the diffusion kinetic constant and
and 1, anomalous transport is observed, where both Fickian and polymer re- k2 is the relaxation rate constant. From Table 1, we discovered that k2 domi-
laxation phenomena contribute to the release. n > 1 implies super case II nated over the diffusional constant k1 for all the hydrogels. However, it is not
transport mechanism, which is due to a large increase in osmotic pressure possible to exactly estimate the contribution of Fickian mechanism or case II
driving forces, followed by the relaxation and swelling of polymers. From mechanism, just from the depicted values. Thus, the ratio of relaxation vs.
the results depicted in Table 1; we could witness that the n values for urea re- Fickian diffusion (R/F) was plotted against the fraction of urea released
lease from GD hydrogels in water lied between 0.73 and 0.90. This data sug- from the GD5 hydrogel in water and in soil and presented in Fig. 7C. It was
gested that urea release in water followed the mechanism of anomalous evident that urea release mechanism is predominantly governed by matrix re-
transport wherein both diffusion and polymer relaxation processes impact laxations in both water and soil media. However, the magnitude of R/ F value
the release. On the other hand, the respective n values for urea release from was higher for urea release from GD5 hydrogel in soil in comparison to that in
GD hydrogels in soil revealed to be >1.00. This indicated that the release water. Thus, we could infer that matrix relaxations played a vital role in
mechanism was super case II transport which reflected the crucial role of penetration of water molecules and regulation of urea release in soil. Taken
the macromolecular relaxation on the molecular movement of urea inside altogether, a diagrammatic representation of the mechanism of urea release
the matrix in soil. For urea release in soil, the water molecules penetrated from GD5 hydrogel in soil is proposed in Scheme 2. When implanted in

Scheme 2. Schematic representation of proposed mechanism of controlled release of urea from GD5 hydrogel in soil.

9
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Fig. 8. (A) Reusability of GD5 hydrogel in water as a function of reswelling for 5 cycles and (B) biodegradability of GD5 hydrogel as a function of time in soil.

agricultural soil, the water first penetrates through the walls of GD5 hydrogel 20 % of the initial swelling capacity of GD5 hydrogel. Thus, we could see that
and then dissolves the fertilizer nutrients (urea, in this case) present inside GD5 hydrogel still had the ability to absorb high amounts of water, even
the matrix. As the urea starts to get dissolved, an osmotic pressure is built after 5 cycles. This could be likely attributed to its denser and tough network
within the matrix resulting in a swelled matrix. Thereafter, the pressure gra- structures owing to in situ crosslinking. However, the decrease in the water
dient acts as the driving force for the controlled urea release via diffusion. absorbing capacity of the GD5 hydrogel after 5 cycles could likely be as-
Such a multi-stage diffusion release mechanism for CRFs has also been ac- cribed to the breakdown of the physical crosslinking points inside the matrix
cepted previously (Li and Chen, 2020). during the swelling-deswelling process (Salimi et al., 2020). Subsequently,
the network entanglements weaken and a reduced swelling is witnessed.
3.9. Reusability of GD hydrogel
3.10. Biodegradation
The water absorbency of GD5 hydrogel in distilled water as a function of
reswelling times for 5 number of cycles is depicted in Fig. 8A. It was seen that To access the biodegradability of GD5 hydrogel, it was buried in soil and
the water absorbency amounted to ∼823 % after 5 cycles; which was about its weight loss was estimated subsequently as a function of time. As

Fig. 9. The phytotoxicity assay. Digital photographs of (A) garlic, (B) beans and (C) okra plants on the 15th day of incubation with soil and GD hydrogels. (D) The average
fresh weight of the plants exposed to soil and GD hydrogels after 15 days.

10
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

witnessed in Fig. 8B, the GD5 hydrogel degrades gradually with time. By Table 2
the end of second month, almost 70 % of the hydrogel has degraded. This Chlorophyll content (mg/g fresh leaves) in okra plants.
observation could be explained by the fact that the hydrogel is invaded Sample Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll b Chlorophyll a + b
by different kinds of microorganisms present in the soil which aid in the Control 20.78 ± 0.88 15.78 ± 0.13 36.57 ± 1.23
degradation process. This result demonstrated that GD5 hydrogel is a po- GD5-Urea 21.45 ± 1.01 19.35 ± 0.55 40.81 ± 1.21
tent candidate as a CRF in agriculture.

3.11. Phytotoxicity of GD hydrogels facilitated the growth of a healthier plant. This is also witnessed from the
photographs depicted in Fig. 10C. The Okra plant that is furnished with
To assess the phytotoxicity induced by the prepared hydrogels, visual the designed GD5-urea hydrogel yielded higher fruits among the rest.
assessment was conducted to detect any damage to the saplings of our After the period of week 8, the plants were subjected to drought condi-
study. Fig. 9A, B and C project the digital photographs of various plants, tions and were stopped watering. Fig. 10D illustrates the selected digital
namely garlic, beans and Okra, subjected to GD hydrogels respectively. Ev- photographs of the plants under different fertilizer conditions. We could ob-
idently, there was no damage to the plants after 15th day of incubation with serve that the Okra plant promoted by GD5-urea hydrogel could maintain
GD1, GD3 and GD5 hydrogels. Fig. 8D depicts the average weights of the for week 2 while the control could hardly be kept alive. This surprising
plants exposed to soil (control) and GD hydrogels. Negligible differences drought resistance feature of GD5-urea hydrogel indicated that it is condu-
(p < 0.05) were observed in the average fresh weights of the plants. cive for plant growth and apt in retaining soil moisture.
These findings were highly suggestive of nontoxicity perspective of the Photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll to be precise, are specialized in
GD hydrogels. light-energy absorbing used for carbon fixation. Their content have a direct
impact on the photosynthetic capacity and subsequently, the plant growth.
3.12. Evaluation of urea-loaded GD5 hydrogel on the growth of Okra plants Hence, both the content and proportion of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b
impact the selective absorption of light and its use by the plant. The respec-
The influence of urea-loaded GD5 hydrogel on the growth of Okra tive data for chlorophyll content have been tabulated in Table 2. The GD5-
plants was investigated. Along with our chosen sample, okra plants in urea promoted plant displayed enhanced chlorophyll content, thus suggest-
neat soil and urea-based soil devoid of GD hydrogel, were also examined ing better photosynthesis and better plant growth.
for a comparative analysis. Of the various assessment of plant growth
such as measurements of dry mass of plant or that of seeds or fruit; the mea- 4. Conclusion
surement of plant height and the number of leaves is an easy method and
have been employed in our case. The plant growth test was measured in The focus of this work was to explore the synthesis of an eco-friendly
soil upto 8 weeks and presented in Fig. 10A and B. The plants without bio-inspired Schiff-base hydrogel composed of gelatin and dialdehyde
any fertilizer (represented as Control) showed mediocre growth both in xanthan gum with controlled release feature of urea for agricultural pur-
terms of stalk height and number of budding leaves, even after weeks 8. poses. The hydrogel fabrication was accomplished via the facile strategy
However, the prominence in the growth of the plants furnished with pure of in situ crosslinking reaction between the aldehyde groups of DAXG and
urea or GD5-urea hydrogel is clearly evident. While the pure urea supple- the amino groups of gelatin. Various grades of hydrogels were constructed
mented plant reached a height of 30 cm after week 6; the GD5-urea hydro- by varying the DAXG content. The hydrogels possessed an interconnected
gel facilitated the height to 41 cm. This enhancement in plant height porous network structure and an increasing DAXG content lowered the
promoted by the GD5-urea hydrogel suggested its greater efficacy than swelling and rendered a more compact matrix. The water-retention prop-
the plant supplemented with pure urea only. Apparently, the nitrogen re- erty in soil was prolonged to the 14th day in presence of GD5 hydrogel.
leased quickly from the neat urea resulting more in loss than utility. On From the urea release data, it could be witnessed that the cumulative
the contrary, the controlled release of nitrogen from GD5-urea hydrogel rates of urea release in soil was significantly extended than that in distilled

Fig. 10. The plant growth assay. The histograms of (A) number of leaves and (B) stalk height of the Okra plant in different soil conditions in week 1 and week 6. (C) Images of
plants growth in week 1 and week 8. (D) Images of plant growth in drought conditions after yielding fruits for week 2.

11
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

water medium. Furthermore, the urea release from GD5 hydrogel in soil Di Martino, A., Khan, Y.A., Durpekova, S., Sedlarik, V., Elich, O., Cechmankova, J., 2021.
Ecofriendly renewable hydrogels based on whey protein and for slow release of fertilizers
was stabilized upto a period of >30 days which suggested its high potency and soil conditioning. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124848.
as a CRF. The kinetics of urea release recommended a multi-stage diffusion Drecht, G.V., Bouwman, A.F., Knoop, J.M., Beusen, A.H.W., Meinardi, C.R., 2003. Global
release mechanism driven by the osmotic pressure that is built within the modeling of the fate of nitrogen from point and nonpoint sources in soils, groundwater,
and surface water. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17 (4), 1115.
hydrogel matrix upon implantation in soil. The reusability experiments re- Fenu, G., Malloci, F.M., 2020. DSS LANDS: a decision support system for agriculture in Sar-
vealed that the GD5 hydrogel could retain its swellability even after 5 cy- dinia. High Tech. Innov. J. 3, 129–135.
cles. From the biodegradation study, it was found almost 70 % of the GD5 Fu, J., Wang, C., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Chen, D., 2018. Classification research and types of slow
controlled release fertilizers (SRFs) used - a review. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 49,
hydrogel had degraded by the end of second month, thereby suggesting
2219–2230.
its environmental benevolence. The phytotoxic assay on garlic, beans and Galloway, J.N., Townsend, A.R., Erisman, J.W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J.R., Martinelli,
Okra plants indicated the hydrogels did not induce any toxic components L.A., Seitzinger, S.P., Sutton, M.A., 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent
trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320 (5878), 889–892.
into the soil. Moreover, the presence of GD5-urea hydrogel in the soil af-
Gao, Y., et al., 2021. Mixture of controlled-release and conventional urea fertilizer application
fected the plant-growth process remarkably. An evaluation on the promi- changed soil aggregate stability, humic acid molecular composition, and maize nitrogen
nent soil water holding and plant growth promotion role of GD5-urea uptake. Sci. Total Environ. 789, 147778.
hydrogel revealed good results in Okra plants. In conclusion, our work Ge, L., Li, X., Zhang, R., Yang, T., Ye, X., Li, D., Mu, C., 2015. Development and characteriza-
tion of dialdehyde xanthan gum crosslinked gelatin based edible films incorporated with
has provided a facile and simplistic in situ crosslinking strategy for prepar- amino-functionalized montmorillonite. Food Hydrocoll. 51, 129–135.
ing eco-friendly CRF hydrogels to facilitate the plant growth and simulta- Ge, L., Zhu, M., Xu, Y., Li, X., Li, D., Mu, C., 2017. Development of antimicrobial and con-
neously maintain soil humidity. The results indicate that our designed trolled biodegradable gelatin-based edible films containing nisin and amino-
functionalized montmorillonite. Food Bioprocess Technol. 10, 1727–1736.
Schiff-base GD5 hydrogel not only ensures a controlled release activity Ge, L., Xu, Y., Li, X., Yuan, L., Tan, H., Li, D., Mu, C., 2018b. Fabrication of antibacterial
but also enables as a soil moisturizer for agricultural applications in arid collagen-based composite wound dressing. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 9153–9166.
and semi-arid regions. Ge, L., Zhu, M., Li, X., Xu, Y., Ma, X., Shi, R., Li, D., Mu, C., 2018a. Development of active
rosmarinic acid gelatin biodegradable films with antioxidant and long-term antibacterial
activities. Food Hydrocoll. 83, 308–316.
Funding Ghobashy, M.M., 2020. The application of natural polymer-based hydrogels for agriculture.
Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers. Elsevier, pp. 329–356.
Ghobashy, M.M., El-Damhougy, B.Kh., Nady, N., El-Wahab, H.A., Naser, A.M., Abdelhai, F.,
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in 2018. Radiation crosslinking of modifying super absorbent (polyacrylamide/gelatin) hy-
the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. drogel as fertilizers carrier and soil conditioner. J. Polym. Environ. 26, 3981–3994.
Ghobashy, M.M., El-Damhougy, B.Kh., El-Wahab, H.A., Madani, M., Amin, M.A., Naser,
A.E.M., Abdelhai, F., Nady, N., Meganid, A.S., Alkhursani, S.A., Alshangiti, D.M.,
CRediT authorship contribution statement 2021b. Controlling radiation degradation of a CMC solution to optimize the swelling of
acrylic acid hydrogel as water and fertilizer carriers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 32, 514–524.
GD: conceptualization, writing original draft, summarizing. Ghobashy, M.M., Mousaa, I.M., El-Sayyad, G.S., 2021a. Radiation synthesis of urea/hydrogel
core shells coated with three different natural oils via a layer-by-layer approach: an inves-
SD: conceptualization, supervision, writing - review and editing. tigation of their slow release and effects on plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Prog.
Org. Coat. 151, 106022.
Data availability Guo, M., Liu, M., Zhan, F., Wu, L., 2005. Preparation and properties of a slow-release
membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 4206–4211.
Data will be made available on request. Guo, J., Ge, L., Li, X., Mu, C., Li, D., 2014. Periodate oxidation of xanthan gum and its
crosslinking effects on gelatin- based edible films. Food Hydrocoll. 39, 243–250.
Huang, C.Y., Xu, J.M., 2010. Soil Science. Agriculture Press, China.
Declaration of competing interest Iftime, M.M., Morariu, S., Marin, L., 2017. Salicyl-imine-chitosan hydrogels: supramolecular
architecturing as a crosslinking method toward multifunctional hydrogels. Carbohydr.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial inter- Polym. 165, 39–50.
Iftime, M.M., Ailiesei, G.L., Ungureanu, E., Marin, L., 2019. Designing chitosan based
ests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the ecofriendly multifunctional soil conditioner systems with urea controlled release and
work reported in this paper. water retention. Carbohydr. Polym. 223, 115040.
Jena, S.R., Dalei, G., Das, S., Nayak, J., Pradhan, M., Samanta, L., 2022. Harnessing the poten-
tial of dialdehyde alginate-xanthan gum hydrogels as niche bioscaffolds for tissue engi-
Acknowledgements neering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 207, 493–506.
Jia, Y., Hu, Z., Mu, J., Zhang, W., Xie, Z., Wang, G., 2020. Preparation of biochar as a coating
SD expresses her gratitude to Department of Chemistry, Ravenshaw material for biochar-coated urea. Sci. Total Environ. 731, 139063.
Jones, J.M., Rollinson, A.N., 2013. Thermogravimetric evolved gas analysis of urea and urea
University, Cuttack, Odisha and GD acknowledges Department of Chemis- solutions with nickel alumina catalyst. Thermochim. Acta 565, 39–45.
try, Odisha University of Technology and Research Bhubaneswar, Odisha Kim, U.-J., Kuga, S., Wada, M., Okano, T., Kondo, T., 2000. Periodate oxidation of crystalline
for providing the essential amenities to carry out this study. cellulose. Biomacromolecules 1, 488–492.
Kiran, Tiwari, R., Krishnamoorthi, S., Kumar, K., 2019. Synthesis of cross-linker devoid novel
hydrogels: swelling behaviour and controlled urea release studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
References 7, 103162.
Klimczyk, M., Siczek, A., Schimmelpfennig, L., 2021. Improving the efficiency of urea-based
Arafa, E.G., Sabaa, M.W., Mohamed, R.R., Elzanaty, A.M., Abdel-Gawad, O.F., 2022a. Prepa- fertilization leading to reduction in ammonia emission. Sci. Total Environ. 771, 145483.
ration of biodegradable sodium alginate/carboxymethylchitosan hydrogels for the slow- Krajewska, B., 2009. Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: a review. J. Mol.
release of urea fertilizer and their antimicrobial activity. React. Funct. Polym. 174, Catal., B Enzym. 59, 9–21.
105243. Kumaraswamy, R.V., Saharan, V., Kumari, S., Choudhary, R.C., Pal, A., Sharma, S.S., Rakshit,
Aviv, O., Laout, N., Ratner, S., Harik, O., Kunduru, K.R., Domb, A.J., 2013. Controlled iodine S., Raliya, R., Biswas, P., 2021. Chitosan-silicon nanofertilizer to enhance plant growth
release from polyurethane sponges for water decontamination. J. Control. Release 172 and yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 159, 53–66.
(3), 634–640. Leon, O., Munoz-Bonilla, A., Soto, D., Ramirez, J., Marquez, Y., Colina, M., Fernandez-Garcia,
Azeem, B., KuShaari, K., Man, Z.B., Basit, A., Thanh, T.H., 2014. Review on materials & methods M., 2018. Preparation of oxidized and grafted chitosan superabsorbents for urea delivery.
to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J. Control. Release 181, 11–21. J. Polym. Environ. 26, 728–739.
Babar, A., KuZilati, K., Man, Z.B., Abdul, B., Thanh, T.H., 2014. Review on materials & methods Li, S., Chen, G., 2020. Contemporary strategies for enhancing nitrogen retention and mitigat-
to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J. Control. Release 181, 11–21. ing nitrous oxide emission in agricultural soils: present and future. Environ. Dev. Sustain.
Chen, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-H., 2019. Thermo and pH-responsive methylcellulose and hydroxypro- 22, 2703–2741.
pyl methylcellulose hydrogels containing K2SO4 for water retention and a controlled- Liang, R., Yuan, H., Xi, G., Zhou, Q., 2009. Synthesis of wheat straw-g-poly(acrylic acid) su-
release water-soluble fertilizer. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 958–967. perabsorbent composites and release of urea from it. Carbohydr. Polym. 77, 181–187.
Chen, Y., Li, W., Zhang, S., 2021. A multifunctional eco-friendly fertilizer used keratin-based Lichtenthaler, H.K., Wellburn, A.R., 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chloro-
superabsorbent as coatings for slow-release urea and remediation of contaminated soil. phylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11 (5), 591–592.
Prog. Orgthermo. Coat. 154, 106158. McClements, D.J., 2017. Recent progress in hydrogel delivery systems for improving nutra-
Dalei, G., Das, S., Jena, S.R., Jena, D., Nayak, J., Samanta, L., 2023. In situ crosslinked ceutical bioavailability. Food Hydrocoll. 68, 238–245.
dialdehyde guar gum-chitosan schiff-base hydrogels for dual drug release in colorectal Mishra, R.K., Majeed, A.B.A., Banthia, A.K., 2011. Development and characterization of
cancer therapy. Chem. Eng. Sci. 269, 118482. pectin/gelatin hydrogel membranes for wound dressing. Int. J. Plast. Technol. 15, 82–95.

12
S. Das, G. Dalei Science of the Total Environment 875 (2023) 162660

Mishra, S., Thombare, N., Ali, M., Swami, S., 2018. Applications of biopolymeric gels in agri- toward environmentally benign slow-release urea fertilizers. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8,
cultural sector. Polymer Gels, (2018). Springer, Singapore, pp. 185–228. 103765.
Mohammadbagheri, Z., Rahmati, A., Hoshyarmanesh, P., 2021. Synthesis of a novel superab- Saruchi, Kaith, B.S., Jindal, R., Kapur, G., Kumar, V., 2014. Synthesis, characterization and
sorbent with slow-release urea fertilizer using modified cellulose as a grafting agent and evaluation of Gum tragacanth and acrylic acid based hydrogel for sustained calcium chlo-
flexible copolymer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 182, 1893–1905. ride release – enhancement of water-holding capacity of soil. J. Chin. Adv. Mater. Soc. 2,
Naz, M.Y., Sulaiman, S.A., 2016. Slow-release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from conven- 40–52.
tional urea: a review. J. Control. Release 225, 109–120. Serra, L., Domenech, J., Peppas, N.A., 2006. Drug transport mechanisms and release kinetics
Nezhad-Mokhtari, P., Ghorbani, M., Abyazdani, N., 2021. Reinforcement of hydrogel scaffold from molecularly designed poly(acrylic acid-g-ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomaterials
using oxidized-guar gum incorporated with curcumin-loaded zein nanoparticles to im- 27, 5440–5451.
prove biological performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 167, 59–65. Shen, Y., Wang, H., Li, W., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Wei, H., Li, J., 2020. Synthesis and characterization
Ngwabebhoh, F.A., Zandraa, O., Patwa, R., Saha, N., Capáková, Z., Saha, P., 2021. Self- of double-network hydrogels based on sodium alginate and halloysite for slow release fer-
crosslinked chitosan/dialdehyde xanthan gum blended hypromellose hydrogel for the tilizers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164, 557–565.
controlled delivery of ampicillin, minocycline and rifampicin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Song, B., Liang, H., Sun, R., Peng, P., Jiang, Y., She, D., 2020. Hydrogel synthesis based on lig-
167, 1468–1478. nin/sodium alginate and application in agriculture. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 144, 219–230.
Ozay, H., Ilgin, P., Ozay, O., 2021. Novel hydrogels based on crosslinked chitosan with Sutton, M.A., Oenema, O., Erisman, J.W., 2011. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472,
formyl-phosphazene using schiff-base reaction. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 159–161.
70, 246–255. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., 2010. Plant Physiology. Fifth edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
Paiva, D., Gonçalves, C., Vale, I., Bastos, M.M.S.M., Magalhães, F.D., 2016. Oxidized xanthan Vudjung, C., Saengsuwan, 2018. Biodegradable IPN hydrogels based on pre-vulcanized natu-
gum and chitosan as natural adhesives for cork. Polymers 8, 259. ral rubber and cassava starch as coating membrane for environment-friendly slow-release
Pang, L., Gao, Z., Feng, H., Wang, S., Wang, Q., 2019. Cellulose based materials for controlled urea fertilizer. J. Polym. Environ. 26, 3967–3980.
release formulations of agrochemicals: a review of modifications and applications. Wang, Y., Gao, Z., Shen, F., Li, Y., Zhang, S., Ren, X., Hu, S., 2015. Physicochemical character-
J. Control. Release 316, 105–115. istics and slow release performances of chlorpyrifos encapsulated by poly(butyl acrylate-
Raafat, A.I., El-Arnaouty, M.B., Eid, M., 2012. Radiation synthesis of superabsorbent CMC co-styrene) with the cross-linker ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 63
based hydrogels for agriculture applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B (21), 5196–5204.
283, 71–76. Wen, P., Wu, Z., He, Y., Han, Y., Tong, Y., 2016. Characterization of p(AA-co-AM)/bent/urea
Ragothaman, M., Palanisamy, T., Kalirajan, C., 2014. Collagen - poly(dialdehyde) guar gum and its swelling and slow release behavior in a simulative soil environment. J. Appl.
based porous 3D scaffolds immobilized with growth factor for tissue engineering applica- Polym. Sci. 133, 43082.
tions. Carbohydr. Polym. 114, 399–406. Yang, L., An, D., Wang, T.J., Kan, C.Y., Jin, Y., 2017. Photodegradation of polymer materials
Ramli, R.A., 2019. Slow release fertilizer hydrogels: a review. Polym. Chem. 10, 6073. used for film coatings of controlled-release fertilizers. Chem. Eng. Technol. 40,
Rigueto, C.V.T., Nazari, M.T., Massuda, L.A., Ostwald, B.E.P., Piccin, J.S., Dettmer, A., 2021. 1611–1618.
Production and environmental applications of gelatin-based composite adsorbents for Zhao, C., Shen, Y.Z., Du, C.W., Zhou, J.M., Wang, H.Y., Chen, X.Y., 2010. Evaluation of water-
contaminants removal: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 2465–2486. borne coating for controlled-release fertilizer using wurster fluidized bed. Ind. Eng.
Roberts, T.L., 2009. The role of fertilizer in growing the world’s food. Better Crops 93 (2), Chem. Res. 49, 9644–9647.
12–15. Zhou, H.Y., Chen, X.G., Kong, M., Liu, C.S., Cha, D.S., Kennedy, J.F., 2008. Effect of molecular
Salimi, M., Motamedi, E., Motesharezedeh, B., Hosseini, H.M., Alikhani, H.A., 2020. Starch-g- weight and degree of chitosan deacetylation on the preparation and characteristics of chi-
poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) composites reinforced with natural char nanoparticles tosan thermosensitive hydrogel as a delivery system. Carbohydr. Polym. 73 (2), 265–273.

13

You might also like