Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes On The Novella
Notes On The Novella
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1345448?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Duke University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction
GRAHAM GOOD
Attempts to define short fictional forms and distinguish them from the
often in danger of tautology. The emphasis on qualities like economy, con
tion, or unity can seem to boil down to the idea that short fictions are d
from novels because they are, well, shorter. This in turn may imply th
fiction is a continuous, homogeneous fabric which can be cut and tailored
length. Categories based purely on length are bound to be arbitrary; th
magic number of words which constitutes the minimum for a novel or t
mum for a short story, and there are always borderline cases. So the te
is to give up the business of formal genre definition for short fiction as
or fruitless, and to deal with individual texts as parts of the author's whol
within a general perspective on fiction dominated by the novel. Fiction
thought of as "the novel" plus assorted hangers-on of lesser proport
colon in NOVEL: A FORUM ON FICTION implies as much.
Short fiction is thus bedevilled for theorists by its adjacency to the longer f
Other genres can be opposed to each other more easily by basic plot-form
versus tragedy) or medium of presentation (drama versus novel), where
and short fiction are always in some awkward way next to each other, ove
and interpenetrating. Nevertheless, there has been a number of efforts a
tangling the two, and what follows is an historical and comparative review
of them, centering on the term "novella" and its complex semantic-histo
lations with the novel.
Short fiction terminology is extremely varied and often inconsistent. The word
"novella" is gradually gaining acceptance in English among publishers, writers,
and latterly critics, to denote a fictional prose narrative of "medium" length. This
usage is supplementing rather than supplanting "short story," which has been
firmly established since the turn of the century. The older terms "tale" and simply
"story" were still employed by writers like James and Conrad to refer to any
narrative shorter than a novel, from about five to a hundred or more pages. But
this usage was eroded in the late nineteenth century by the magazine term "short
story," which, with its connotations of abruptness and curtailment, tended to con-
fine itself to the lower end of this range-short story manuals still preach an
ascetic brevity, attained by diligent cutting and paring away the fat, until the
art comes to seem one of pure omission. For a while such erosiveness left the
1 Neophilologus, 51 (1967), 117-27, 225-30. I owe much to this article, and to Edith K
Novel/Novella" in The Disciplines of Criticism, ed. Peter Demetz, Thomas Greene, a
(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), pp. 511-31; and Werner Krauss, "Nove
Novelle, ed. Josef Kunz (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968), pp. 22
of German novella theory is thorough and extremely useful, though some of the p
standard English-language work in this field is E. K. Bennett and H. M. Waidson, A
Novelle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961). John M. Ellis, Narration in
Theory and Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974), eloq
orthodoxies about the "Novelle" and analyzes some standard German examples of
of mainly Anglo-American theory of narration, treating them as "fiction" not radi
novel: roughly the opposite of what I attempt here.
2 Ann Shukman of Oxford University has supplied me with a Russian line as foll
povest', roman. There is a Russian word "novella," but it means specificially a short
on plot or action.
3 Kunz, p. 52.
is like this to be imprisoned in a Soviet labor camp." Other types are the no
satire (such as Animal Farm), which tends to be more tightly plotted than
episodic novel-length counterpart; the "degenerative tragedy" (such as Deat
Venice), where a character gradually succumbs to a pre-determined fat
serious plots of character and learning. But beyond the initial criterion of le
there is still no global conception of the genre which holds the sub-genres togeth
A conception of this type is offered in Judith Leibowitz's Narrative Purpo
the Novella (Mouton, 1974): "Whereas the short story limits material and t
novel extends it, the novella does both in such a way that a special kind of
tive structure results, one which produces a generically distinct effect: the d
effect of intensity and expansion" (p. 16). This result is frequently ach
through repetitive structure: after the first revelation or recognition the n
redevelops or re-examines the situation, thus producing a greater themati
tensity.
Leibowitz, Springer, and Gillespie all situate the novella midway between the
short story and the novel;4 this has the advantages of roughly reflecting current
usage, and corresponding to the French triad "conte," "nouvelle," "roman." But
here I propose to use "novella" to cover both the short and the medium lengths.
This has some justifications. (1) In the Renaissance the term encompassed both
the very brief stories in the Decameron and the middle-length Novelas Ejemplares
of Cervantes. (2) In post-1800 German practice "Novelle" includes texts of under
five and well over a hundred pages. (3) The nineteenth-century English terms
"tale" and "story" covered both lengths. (4) "Short story" is a mainly twentieth-
century phrase for a particular type of magazine fiction; it has been applied to
earlier and foreign fictions to which it is not always appropriate, though naturally
it has a place within the family of terms I want to cover with "novella." (5) Short
and medium lengths have enough in common in form, content and history to
justify opposing them conjointly to the novel in the German manner, and employ-
ing a two-part model (novella/novel) in preference to a three-part one (short
story/novella/novel).
II
4 Joseph Gibaldi, "The Renaissance Theory of the Novella," Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 2
(Fall, 1975), 201-27, recommends that the term novella be reserved for the Renaissance form, which he
views as sharply distinct from the modern.
are in verse, and are a mixture of fabliaux and romances; Boccaccio's are in pr
and though both ribald and edifying stories are included, the subject matter
largely middle-class, domestic and contemporary. The Decameron takes up el
ments of the medieval verse genres of the fabliau and the romance, and fashi
them into a new genre, the prose novella. This form is distinguished from t
folk-tale by its modernity of content, and though it remains strongly oral
character, the new context is of polite, cultivated conversation. The Boccacci
novella is also shorter than the fabliau or the romance; it consists of materi
which would have been merely an incident or episode in the older forms. Th
incidents are handled with great economy: usually dispensing with digression
description, the tales focus on neatness of plot, particularly on the unexpect
"twist" whereby a situation or line of development is abruptly reversed. Thou
qualities of nobility and fidelity are sometimes shown, the primacy of plot m
often calls for cunning and quick-wittedness on the part of the characters as t
try to outsmart each other.
Cervantes' Novelas Ejemplares are longer and more elaborate and digress
than the stories in the Decameron. They are not set in a common framework,
are more varied in type. For example "Rinconete and Cortadillo" is a loosely lin
series of episodes in which two poor youths are introduced into the life of a co
munity of thieves. Interest centers on the milieu and life-style of the thiev
including their slang, rather than on the plot, and this provides an importa
alternative model for the novella. On the other hand, "The Jealous Extremadur
has a classic Boccaccian plot: a rich old husband's endeavors to keep his young
wife in total seclusion are foiled by a persistent and ingenious lover. But the t
is much more fully developed than anything in the Decameron; it contains l
descriptions of the layout and defenses of the house, and also incorporates t
text of a song performed by the seducer and a set speech at the end in which
husband displays an unexpected and perhaps uncharacteristic generosity to tho
who have deceived him.
Besides being the second major figure in the history of the novella, Cervant
is of course the first in the history of the novel. And the two achievements a
related: Don Quijote itself has various inserted shorter narratives, and the Nove
may well include material Cervantes decided not to use in the novel. Vik
Shklovsky's analysis of "How Don Quijote Is Made" 5 asserts that the her
primary function is not as a character of intrinsic interest, but as a unifying devic
for the diverse compositional units the author wanted to employ: the set spee
the poem, the proverb, and the novella. To begin with, Shklovsky says, Cerva
presented Don Quijote as a fool; yet he came to need him as a thread on whic
to hang examples of eloquence on such topics as "The Golden Age," or "A
and Letters." Only in the middle of the novel did Cervantes begin to use
folly/wisdom contradiction artistically. Similarly, Sancho serves to accumula
texts embodying a type of wisdom which contrasts with the Don's class
rhetoric: the proverbial. The novellas are linked to the main text by various
6 "Wie Don Quijote gemacht ist," in Theorie der Prosa, trans. Gisela Drohla (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1
pp. 89-130.
6 "La construction de la nouvelle et du roman," in Theorie de la litterature, trans. and ed. Tzvetan Todorov
(Paris: Seuil, 1965), p. 189.
7 Shklovsky, p. 196.
8 Georg Lukacs, Solzhenitsyn, tr. W. D. Graf (London: Merlin Press, 1970), p. 7. For earlier distinctions
of the novella from the novel, see Soul and Form, tr. Anna Bostock (London: Merlin Press, 1974), p. 73;
and The Theory of the Novel, tr. Anna Bostock (London: Merlin Press, 1971), pp. 50-51.
III
The development of the novella in the nineteenth century in the various national
literatures of the West differs as much as that of the novel, if not more. It is in
Germany that the genre is revived and recognized earliest, practiced most widely,
and defined most exhaustively. The way is paved by Goethe: his Unterhaltungen
deutscher Ausgewanderten of 1795 clearly takes the Decameron as its classical
model. Again, the framing situation is an escape from adverse social conditions:
a group of fugitives from the upheavals caused by the French Revolution agree
to pass the time of their retreat by telling each other stories. The first major
theoretical formulation of the genre is also made with direct reference to the
Decameron, by Friedrich Schlegel in his Nachricht von den poetischen Werken
des Johannes Boccaccio of 1801. This is his definition:
9 Lukics, Solzhenitsyn, p. 7.
These three features, the novelty of the plot, the oral character of the narrative
situation, and the independence of the story from social and historical factors,
become perennial, though not uncontested, themes in German Novellentheorie.
Goethe echoed the first point in his famous rhetorical question to Eckermann in
1827: "Was ist eine Novelle anders als eine sich ereignete, unerhSrte Begeben-
heit?" (l ("What is a novella other than an unheard-of event that has actually
taken place?") This definition sets the novella in an intermediate zone of prob-
ability between fantasy or romance on one side, and the realistic novel on the
other.
From this starting point, German novella theory developed a stock of generic
indicators which, beyond the criterion of length, pointed up the distinction between
the novel and the novella. Boccaccio remains an important model: the so-called
Falkentheorie of Paul Heyse, which asserts the need for a single unifying symbol
in a novella, is based on the falcon in the Ninth Tale of the Fifth Day. The other
most important idea is Tieck's Wendepunkt or turning-point, where the story
"unexpectedly takes a quite different direction, and develops consequences which
are nevertheless natural and entirely in keeping with character and circum-
stances." 12 These terms are still commonly met with in criticism of the German
novella, and are useful as long as they are not made definitive of the genre.
On a less technical and more philosophical level, the debate about the nature
of the novella was renewed in the years around 1930 over the question of whether
the genre is fundamentally tragic or conversational. Bernhard Bruch's "Novelle
und Trag6die" contends that the post-1800 novella is only very distantly related
to the Renaissance form. Rather, it becomes the bourgeois Ersatzform of true
tragedy: "If tragedy is in essence an heroic form, the novella is entirely a
bourgeois-sentimental one (eine burgerlich-empfindsame)." 13 The greatness of
tragedy was to show that some situations in real life are actually and irredeem-
ably tragic. The novella lacks this objectivity: the fatalism is of the narrator's
mood, and the stricken character's fate is private and exceptional. This is because
the novella's formal function is to recall something that once happened to a man,
whereas the tragic hero has to ask "What shall I do?" and make an ethical choice
in the present. Instead of this heroic assertion of will and responsibility, the
novella character tends to show an inner spiritual passivity. Both tragedy and
novella are closed forms, with internal distance created by the stage frame and
the narrative frame (present by implication even when formally absent) respec-
10 Kunz, p. 41.
UKunz, p. 34.
12 Kunz, p. 53.
19 Kunz, p. 124.
tively; but where tragedy immediately presents an ethical choice in the present,
the novella subjectively mediates through the personality of the narrator the story
of a fated life already essentially past.
Adolf von Grolman's "The Strict Novella-Form and the Problem of its Break-
up" 14 responds by re-emphasizing the social nature of the novella, which he de-
fines as a reply to the question, "What's new?" This dialogic exchange can only
happen in a culture where conversation is a civilized art. The novella is a social
form which gathers together a group of auditors, and in that way is directed
against solitude; but the corollary is that it often tells the story of a solitary or out-
cast individual or group. Thus the novella affirms the inclusive group identity of
the listeners by the very act of presenting the fate of the excluded: the normal and
the abnormal reciprocally define each other.
Hermann Pongs, however, rejects this social emphasis in his essay on "Possibili-
ties of the Tragic in the Novella," 15 and also makes an even stronger distinction
than Bruch between the Renaissance and Romantic forms of the novella. Pongs
asserts that Kleist transforms the old, sociable, Romance-language novella by dis-
solving the conversational context and freeing the genre to show the confronta-
tion of the separated individual with Fate. The ironic distance from events created
in the Mediterranean novella by the narrator's being in company is strongly con-
trasted to the "life-depths" of the German novella.
The German Novelle, however, despite the unparalleled amount of theoretical
and critical attention it has received is not a unique genre. The "canon" of recog-
nized classics which runs from Goethe's "Novelle" to Mann's Death in Venice
and beyond, could be matched without difficulty in the other national literatures,
even if the texts are differently classified in their own cultures. There is no intrinsic
reason why the theory of the novella developed in Germany should not be ap-
plicable to novellas from other countries, and we can sometimes find its key ideas
echoed by writers elsewhere. For example, Frank O'Connor writes:
The novel can still adhere to the classical concept of civilized society, of man
as an animal who lives in a community, as in Jane Austen and Trollope it ob-
viously does; but the short story remains by its very nature remote from the
community-romantic, individualist, and intransigent.16
O'Connor argues that this individualism is not channeled through a single hero,
as in the novel, but through a "submerged population group" such as "Gogol's
officials, Turgenev's serfs, Maupassant's prostitutes, Chekhov's doctors and
teachers, Sherwood Anderson's provincials, always dreaming of escape." 17 Where
the novel concerns individuals within society, the short story treats groups which
16 Frank O'Connor, The Lonely Voice: A Study of the Short Story (Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1963),
p. 21.
17 O'Connor, p. 18.
are outside it, or at any rate outside the normal social experience to be expe
of the reader. The formal differences between the two genres stem from th
novel, O'Connor says, is based on chronological structure, whereas
IV
The novel and short story are forms not only different in kind but also in
ently at odds, and for that reason are never found being developed simult
ously and with equal intensity in any one literature.... Not only indiv
writers but also individual cultures cultivate either the novel or the short stor
If we apply this to the situation in Germany, we find that the novella does
xs O'Connor, p. 105.
19 Howard Nemerov, Poetry and Fiction: Essays (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1963), p. 245.
20 Boris Eichenbaum, "O. Henry and the Theory of the Short Story," in L. Matejka and K. Pomorska, eds.,
Readings in Russian Poetics (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1971), p. 231.
a2 See Wendell Harris, "English Short Fiction in the Nineteenth Century," Stud
1968), 1-93.
2 See Alfred Engstrom, "The Formal Short Story in France and its Developm
Philology, 42 (1945), 627-39.
tively broken. New magazines appeared which preferred complete short stories
to serials, and many new opportunities were opened up to writers of short fiction.
Henry James rejoiced in chances to work in the form he called the "shapely
nouvelle," Conrad began to produce his novellas of the sea and distant parts of
the world, and Kipling's Plain Tales from the Hills (1888) created a new succinct-
ness of form and crisp, teasing colloquialism of style. The Yellow Book and The
Savoy provided an outlet for more pessimistic or naturalistic stories, particularly
on risque subjects like casual sex or suicide. Some specialized forms of short fiction
were also pioneered at this time: Arthur Conan Doyle found a mass public for
the detective story with his Sherlock Holmes series, as Wells did for the science
fiction story.23
In France the novella was brought to a new, post-Flaubertian level of sophisti-
cation and artistry by Maupassant. His stories often combine brief but vivid evoca-
tions of a given milieu with a highly-shaped plot, frequently concerned with
trickery in affairs of money, status, and sex. The "novelty" of many of these
swindles and revenges is reminiscent of Boccaccio and the oldest strain in the
history of the novella. The interplay of gullible innocence and cynical experience
is shaped by Maupassant into a bitterly "worldly" vision of human selfishness
and hypocrisy characteristic of his typical roue narrator, although there are post-
romantic sensitivities to natural beauty and some moments of poignancy and
despairing tenderness.
In Russia during the same period Chekhov was practicing a new form of the
novella, one which has a minimal plot. Depending more on atmosphere and sug-
gestion than on incident, it consists of a delicate interweaving of states of con-
sciousness with particular scenes or relatively trivial events. The characters tend
to have a gentle, even ineffectual, sensibility, and the instinctual drives and low
cunning which motivate many of Maupassant's ingenious plots are largely absent.
The subtlety of this kind of impressionistic fiction makes it less compatible with an
oral narrative frame: the slightness of the plot provides little occasion for a live
recounting. Conrad Aiken defines this type of story well in relation to two of its
best practitioners:
Miss Mansfield has followed Chekhov in choosing to regard ... the short story
"form" not as the means to the telling of a tale, and not always or wholly as
the means for the "lighting" of a single human character, but rather as the
means for the presentation of a "quintessence," a summation of a human life
or group of lives in the single significant "scene" or situation or episode.24
This form derives not from the highly-plotted Boccaccian tradition which influ-
ences Maupassant, but from the nineteenth-century "scene" or "sketch" or "feuil-
leton." This genre had earlier nourished the social novel through the apprentice
writings of several major writers, such as Dickens (Sketches by Boz), George Eliot
(Scenes from Clerical Life), and Turgenev (Sketches from a Hunter's Album),
but the key to the Chekhovian development of this form is the interposition of a
less worldly, more sensitive and impressionable consciousness through which
the scenes are viewed.
The range of the modern novella can be defined by these two poles: at one end
the almost eventless record of the feelings and impressions of a passive and easily
moved sensibility, and at the other the neatly and strongly plotted account of
coarser motivations, combining trickery in the characters with sleight of hand in
the narrative strategy. This second type is generally the subject of short story
writing manuals, and emphasizes brevity and suspense. But between these ex-
tremes of introversion and extroversion there is a wide range of mixtures: a high
degree of psychological complexity and atmospheric sensitivity is compatible with
narrative suspense and surprise, as in the best novellas of Henry James or
Lawrence.
The following points attempt to collate and summarize the principal ideas and
perspectives we have surveyed, in order to indicate a cluster of features and pos-
sibilities central to the novella.
(1) In many formal respects, prose fiction of any length has a common reper-
tory of features. Any device (e.g. a central symbol), technique (e.g. a narrative
frame), point of view (e.g. first- or third-person narration), or content (e.g. ordi-
nary or extraordinary) that is found in the novella can also be found in some
novels. Historically as well as terminologically, the novella and the novel are in-
tricately related, especially in their common defiance of traditional genres. Never-
theless, certain potentialities and characteristics tend to inhere in the shorter
length, and certain others in the longer.
(2) Historically, the Renaissance novella precedes the novel, which itself de-
velops out of collections of novellas: the separate stories become a sequence of
episodes with recurring characters, and the frame merges with the picture. The
novella is revived as an autonomous form during the Romantic period, and in the
nineteenth century the novel and the novella are cultivated separately or together
in different countries and in the work of different authors. The late nineteenth
century bequeaths to the twentieth several new categories of novella: the short
story, the detective story, the science fiction story, the revived tale of trickery,
and the impressionistic mood-piece.
(3) The novella has an element of novelty, either in plot, or in setting, or in
both. Unlike the traditional stories of epic and romance whose outcome is already
well known, the novella's story has not normally been heard before. The novel
also contains "new" characters and modern settings, but they become familiar
through the novel's extended and detailed method. Novelty of plot often consists
of cheating or trickery to deceive the unwary for personal profit or gratification
or revenge; and as the characters surprise each other, so the narrator surprises
his listeners. Novelty of setting implies a distance between the social or geo
cal experience of the audience, and the experience, way of life, or sub-cu
described in the novella. The novelty, though often "out of the ordinary
lies within the realm of the possible. Even if the events are inexplicable in
terms (as in the ghost story, for example) they are presented as actually h
taken place in the real world in the knowable, retrievable, or witnessed pa
is not generally true of the fantasy, the folk tale, or the fairy tale. When the
fiction novella suspends the laws of space, time, or causality, substantiat
generally attempted.
(4) The novella is the written imitation of a live "telling," and has reta
stronger oral characteristics than the novel. These may be implicit in to
style, or may be explicitly incorporated into a "frame" setting, such as the
table after a meal, a long journey, or an enforced respite from some other acti
where stories are told to pass the time. From Boccaccio onwards, these se
tend to presuppose a cultural level where urbane conversation is normal, i
trast to the fairy tale, where the implied audience is naive or credulo
children or rustics).
(5) The frame (implicit or explicit) creates an inner distance within the
between the security and hindsight of the teller and the danger and doubt
characters. The narrative situation is more central to the author's society t
the events narrated. The social stability of the frame may contrast with t
tude or outcast-status of the character or group in the story.
(6) The framed or socially mediated nature of the novella makes it more
tive than the novel to communal wisdom, practical guidance, or explicit ref
on the human condition (though of course these are present in many no
The listener may learn how to avoid being duped, for example, or how h
nature is defined by limit-cases of endurance or weakness or some other q
(7) The formal principle of the novella is intensity; of the novel, extens
regard to character, the appropriate method is dramatic or symbolic rev
rather than gradual development. In plot, the novella lacks the long chai
consequences, the cumulative interactions of self and other and world, w
characterize the novel; instead it often focusses on simple natural or preter
exigencies: apparitions, cataclysms like great storms or earthquakes, and
vidual declines and deaths. The novella is too short to build up evidence f
social-secular theory of causation, and hence is often fatalistic in implicati
(8) Like tragedy, the novella may deal with extreme cases, but its med
retrospective form gives their outcomes a weight of inevitability qualita
different from tragedy. In the novella the action usually ends before the
begins. This means that the novella hero's story has a foregone conclusio
suffering is distanced, where the tragic hero's is immediately present. In t
the hero has the live audience; in the novella it is the narrator. In this pr
the tragic hero makes a decisive choice which brings on his death; the n
more often shows the gradual deterioration of a character into social isola
death as if under a curse against which he cannot assert his will.
(9) The novella's oral quality, its assumption of a copresent teller and h
25 Ramon Fernandez, "La Methode de Balzac: le recit et l'esthetique du roman," in Messages (Paris: Galli-
mard, 1926), p. 60.
26 Fernandez, p. 61.