Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Finamcial Modeling Moisa Altar 2022
1 Finamcial Modeling Moisa Altar 2022
LECTURE NOTES
1
References
3
Why Derivatives Are Important
4
How Derivatives Are Traded
5
How Derivatives are Used
To hedge risks
To speculate (take a view on the future
direction of the market)
To lock in an arbitrage profit
To change the nature of a liability
To change the nature of an investment
without incurring the costs of selling one
portfolio and buying another
6
Forward Price
7
Terminology
8
Profit from a Long Forward
Position (K= delivery price=forward price at
time contract is entered into
9
Profit from a Short Forward
Position (K= delivery price=forward price at time
contract is entered into
10
Futures Contracts
Agreement to buy or sell an asset for a
certain price at a certain time
Similar to forward contract
Whereas a forward contract is traded OTC, a
futures contract is traded on an exchange
11
Exchanges Trading Futures
12
Examples of Futures Contracts
Agreement to:
– Buy 100 oz. of gold @ US$1400/oz. in December
– Sell £62,500 @ 1.4500 US$/£ in March
– Sell 1,000 bbl. of oil @ US$90/bbl. in April
13
1.Gold: An Arbitrage
Opportunity?
Suppose that:
The spot price of gold is US$1,400
The 1-year forward price of gold is US$1,500
The 1-year US$ interest rate is 5% per annum
Is there an arbitrage opportunity?
14
2.Gold: Another Arbitrage
Opportunity?
Suppose that:
- The spot price of gold is US$1,400
- The 1-year forward price of gold is US$1,400
- The 1-year US$ interest rate is 5% per annum
Is there an arbitrage opportunity?
15
The Forward Price of Gold
(ignores the gold lease rate)
Suppose that:
- The spot price of oil is US$95
- The quoted 1-year futures price of oil is US$125
- The 1-year US$ interest rate is 5% per annum
- The storage costs of oil are 2% per annum
Is there an arbitrage opportunity?
17
2. Oil: Another Arbitrage
Opportunity?
Suppose that:
- The spot price of oil is US$95
- The quoted 1-year futures price of oil is US$80
- The 1-year US$ interest rate is 5% per annum
- The storage costs of oil are 2% per annum
Is there an arbitrage opportunity?
18
Options
19
American vs European Options
20
Options vs Futures/Forwards
21
Types of Traders
Hedgers
Speculators
Arbitrageurs
22
Review of Option Types
23
Option Positions
Long call
Long put
Short call
Short put
24
Long Call (Figure 9.1, Page 195)
25
Short Call (Figure 9.3, page 197)
26
Long Put (Figure 9.2, page 196)
27
Short Put (Figure 9.4, page 197)
28
Payoffs from Options
29
Assets Underlying
Exchange-Traded Options
Page 198-199
Stocks
Foreign Currency
Stock Indices
Futures
30
Specification of
Exchange-Traded Options
Expiration date
Strike price
European or American
Call or Put (option class)
31
Terminology
32
Convertible Bonds
33
Notation
34
Effect of Variables on Option
Pricing (Table 10.1, page 215)
35
American vs European Options
36
37
Lower Bound for Calls on
Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks
38
39
40
(Equation 10.4, page 220)
41
Now we can answer the arbitrage opportunity.
A lower bound for the price of a European call option on a
non-dividend-paying stock is
In this case,
Consider the situation where the European call price is
$3.00, which is less than the theoretical minimum of
$3.71. An arbitrageur can short the stock and buy the call
to provide a cash inflow of 20.00-3.00=$17.00. If
42 invested for 1 year at 10% per annum, the $17.00 grows to
43
44
Lower Bound for European Puts on
Non-Dividend-Paying Stocks
45
46
Hence,
47
48
Now we can answer the arbitrage opportunity.
In this case,
Consider the situation where the European put price
is $1.00, which is less than the theoretical minimum
of $2.01. An arbitrageur can borrow $38.00 for 6
months to buy both the put and the stock. At the end
of the 6 months, the arbitrageur will be required to
repay
49
If the stock price is below $40.00, the arbitrageur
exercisesthe option to sell the stock for $40.00, repays the
loan, and makes a profit of
$40.00- $38.96 =$1.04
If the stock price is greater than $40.00, the arbitrageur
discards the option, sells the stock, and repays the loan for
an even greater profit. For example, if the stock price is
$42, the arbitrageur’s profit is 42-38.96=$3.04
50
51
52
53
This relationship is known as put–call parity. It
shows that the value of a European call with a
certain exercise price and exercise date can be
deduced from the value of a European put with the
same exercise price and exercise date, and vice
versa.
54
55
In this case,
56
When invested at the risk-free interest rate, this amount
grows to
in three months. If the stock price at expiration of the
option is greater than $30, the call will be exercised. If it is
less than $30, the put will be exercised. In either case, the
arbitrageur ends up buying one share for $30. This share
can be used to close out the short position. The net profit
is therefore 31.02-30.00=$1.02
57
For an alternative situation, suppose that the call price is
$3 and the put price is $1. In this case,
59
60
61
Trading Strategies Involving Options
62
Put-call parity We represent a first step to understanding the
strategies based on option.
The put–call parity relationship is
63
Equation (11.1) shows that a long position in a European put
combined with a long position in the stock is equivalent to a
long European call position plus a certain amount of cash
64
Equation (11.1) can be rearranged to become
67
1.Bull Spreads
68
69
70
71
72
73
2.Bear Spreads
74
75
76
77
78
3. Box Spreads
79
buying a call with strike price K2, buying a put with strike
price K1, selling a call with strike price K1, and selling a put
with strike price K2
80
Butterfly Spreads
82
83
84
85
86
87
Calendar Spreads
88
89
90
91
A combination is an option trading strategy that involves
taking a position in both calls and puts on the same stock.
We will consider straddles, strips, straps, and strangles
Straddle
One popular combination is a straddle, which involves
buying a European call and put with the same strike price
and expiration date. The profit pattern is shown in Figure
11.10. The strike price is denoted by K. If the stock price is
close to this strike price at expiration
92
93
94
95
Strips and Straps
125 23
85
0
Let C be the current value of the call, Cu be its value at the end of the
period if the stock price goes to uS and Cd be its value at the end of the period if the
stock price goes to dS.
Suppose we form a portfolio containing Δ shares of stock and the dollar amount B in
riskless bonds. This will cost ΔS + B. At the end of the period, the value of this
portfolio will be
Since we can select Δ and B in any way we wish, suppose we choose them to equate the
end-of-period values of the portfolio and the call for each possible outcome. This
requires that
It is easy to see that in the present case, with no dividends, this will always be greater
than S – K as long as the interest rate is positive. To avoid spending time on the
unimportant situations where the interest rate is less than or equal to zero, we will now
assume that r is always greater than one. Hence, (3) is the exact formula for the value
of a call one period prior to the expiration in terms of S, K, u, d, and r.
To confirm this, note that if uS ≤ K, then S < K and C = 0, so C > S – K. Also, if dS ≥ K,
then C = S – (K/r) > S – K. The remaining possibility is uS > K > dS. In this case, C =
p(uS – K)/r. This is greater than S – K if (1 – p)dS > (p – r)K, which is certainly true as
long as r > 1.
This formula has a number of notable features. First, the probability q does not appear
in the formula. This means, surprisingly, that even if different investors have different
subjective probabilities about an upward or downward movement in the stock, they
could still agree on the relationship of C to S, u, d, and r.
Second, the value of the call does not depend on investors’ attitudes toward risk. In
constructing the formula, the only assumption we made about an individual’s behavior
was that he prefers more wealth to less wealth and therefore has an incentive to take
advantage of profitable riskless arbitrage opportunities. We would obtain the same
formula whether investors are risk-averse or risk-preferring.
Third, the only random variable on which the call value depends is the stock price
itself. In particular, it does not depend on the random prices of other securities or
portfolios, such as the market portfolio containing all securities in the economy
Finally, observe that p ≡ (r – d)/(u – d) is always greater than zero and less than
one, so it has the properties of a probability. In fact, p is the value q would have in
equilibrium if investors were risk-neutral. To see this, note that the expected rate of
return on the stock would then be the riskless interest rate, so
Hence, the value of the call can be interpreted as the expectation of its discounted
future value in a risk-neutral world. It can be shown that Δ ≥ 0 and B ≤ 0, so the
hedging portfolio is equivalent to a particular levered long position in the stock. In
equilibrium, the same is true for the call.
Now we can consider the next simplest situation: a call with two periods
remaining before its expiration date. In keeping with the binomial
process, the stock can take on three possible values after two periods,
Cuu stands for the value of a call two periods from the current time if the stock price
moves upward each period; Cdu and Cdd have analogous definitions.
At the end of the current period there will be one period left in the life of the call, and
we will be faced with a problem identical to the one we just solved. Thus, from our
previous analysis, we know that when there are two periods left,
Again, we can select a portfolio with ΔS in stock and B in bonds whose end-of-period
value will be Cu if the stock price goes to uS and Cd if the stock price goes to dS.
Indeed, the functional form of Δ and B remains unchanged. To get the new values of Δ
and B, we simply use equation (1) with the new values of Cu and Cd.
Since Δ and B have the same functional form in each period, the current value of the
call in terms of Cu and Cd will again be C = [pCu + (1 – p)Cd]/r if this is greater than S
– K, and C =S – K otherwise. By substituting from equation (4) into the former
expression, and noting that Cdu = Cud, we obtain
A little algebra shows that this is always greater than S – K if, as assumed, r is always
greater than one, so this expression gives the exact value of the call.
All of the observations made about formula (3) also apply to formula (5), except that
the number of periods remaining until expiration, n, now emerges clearly as an
additional determinant of thecall value. For formula (5), n = 2. That is, the full list of v
ariables determining C is S, K, n, u, d, and r.
We now have a recursive procedure for finding the value of a call with any number of
periods to go. By starting at the expiration date and working backwards, we can write
down the general valuation formula for any n:
This gives us the complete formula, but with a little additional effort we can express it
in a more convenient way.
Let a stand for the minimum number of upward moves that the stock must make over
the next n periods for the call to finish in-the-money. Thus a will be the smallest non-
negative integer such that . By taking the natural logarithm of both sides
of this inequality, we could write a as the smallest non-negative integer greater than
Of course, if a > n, the call will finish out-of-the-money even if the stock moves
upward every period, so its current value must be zero.
By breaking up C into two terms, we can write
16
9
Norbert Wiener (1894 – 1964)
17
0
Fischer Black Myron S. Scholes Robert C. Merton
17
1
Stochastic Processes
17
2
Stochastic character of stock prices
17
3
17
4
Stochastic character of indices
17
5
Example 1
17
6
Example 2
17
7
Markov Processes
(See Hull, pages 280-81)
17
8
Weak-Form Market Efficiency
17
9
Example
A variable is currently 40
It follows a Markov process
Process is stationary (i.e. the parameters of
the process do not change as we move
through time)
At the end of 1 year the variable will have a
normal probability distribution with mean 40
and standard deviation 10
18
0
Questions
18
2
A Wiener Process
(See Hull, pages 282-84)
18
4
Generalized Wiener Processes
(See Hull, page 284-86)
18
5
Generalized Wiener Processes
(continued)
18
6
Taking Limits . . .
18
7
The Example Revisited
19
2
Monte Carlo Simulation
19
3
Monte Carlo Simulation – Sampling
one Path (See Hull Table 13.1, page 289)
19
4
Correlated Processes
19
5
Itô’s Lemma (See Hull pages 291)
19
6
Taylor Series Expansion
19
7
Ignoring Terms of Higher Order
Than Dt
19
8
Substituting for Dx
19
9
Substituting for Dx
20
0
The e2Dt Term
20
1
Taking Limits
20
2
Application of Ito’s Lemma
to a Stock Price Process
20
3
Examples
20
4
LECTURE 7 APRIL 2015
20
5
The Stock Price Assumption
Consider a stock whose price is S
In a short period of time of length Dt, the
return on the stock is normally distributed:
20
6
The Lognormal Property
(Equations 14.2 and 14.3, page 300)
20
8
Continuously Compounded Return
(Equations 14.6 and 14.7, page 302)
20
9
The Expected Return
This is because
21
1
Mutual Fund Returns (See Business
Snapshot 14.1 on page 304)
21
6
The Concepts Underlying Black-
Scholes-Merton
21
8
The Derivation of the Black-Scholes
Differential Equatio continued
21
9
The Derivation of the Black-Scholes
Differential Equation continued
22
0
The Differential Equation
22
2
The N(x) Function
22
3 See tables
Properties of Black-Scholes Formula
22
4
Risk-Neutral Valuation
22
6
Valuing a Forward Contract with
Risk-Neutral Valuation
Payoff is ST – K
Expected payoff in a risk-neutral world is
S0erT – K
Present value of expected payoff is
e-rT[S0erT – K]=S0 – Ke-rT
22
7
22
8
Implied Volatility
22
9
The VIX S&P500 Volatility Index
23
0
An Issue of Warrants & Executive
Stock Options