BS”D

Macrodynamics For Religious Origins From Shem and Advance of Hebrews And Future Israelite, Jewish,
and Related Groups

Jonah Lissner1 2 3 4
1 Alumnus, Foukzon Laboratory, Center for Mathematical Sciences, Technion — Israel Institute of Technology
2 Invited Scientist, Georgian Mathematical Union
3 Researcher, Mugur-Schachter Quantum Mechanics and Information Structures Laboratory
4 Director, Center for Computer Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Physics [CCSMEP]

Copyright 2024 by Jonah Lissner. All Rights Reserved By The Author.

Abstract

Hebrews are defined as a Near Eastern-Levantine sociocultural and genetic group descending exegetically
from Shem, Patriarch and Father of the Shemitic nations of the Near East and Southwest Asia, from exegesis Noah
>> Shem >> Arpakhshad >> Shelah >> Eber>>Peleg>>Reu>>Serug>>Nahor>>Terah>>Abraham, progenator of
the Hebrew nationality and sociocultural group or groups inclusive of Israelites, Judeans and contemporary Jews.

Keywords

Hebrews, Israeli, Shem, Migrations of Israel, Origins of Israel, Geopolitics, International Relations, Torah
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Joshua said to all the people, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: ‘Long ago your ancestors, including
Terah the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the Euphrates River and worshiped other gods.

Joshua 24:2, Torah

1. Introduction

In Archaeohistorical and Sociogenetic definition Hebrews are defined as a separating sociocultural clade of groups
and subgroups, circa at latest, 4,000 BCE, or earliest possibly near the Toraic beginning of this World or Olam, circa
3770 BCE or 5,770 YBP Jewish Calendar; c. 4762 BCE or 6,762 YBP in the Yezidi calendar; c. 4263 BCE or 6,263
YBP in the defunct Ancient Khmetic or Egyptian Calendar; c. 4770 BCE or 6,770 YBP in the Akkadian-Assyrian
Calendar.

The nomenclature of Shem is proposed in the secular explanation as a Hebrew-language transliteration

of Shinar, S.umer, or Shamar'a and indicative of earlier Samarra, Ubaid, Sumerian and Neo-Sumerian civilizations
c. 4.5 Kybp from archaic cities such as Urfar, Harran, and Nippur. The comparative religion of the various Proto-
Hebrew, Hebrew, Ancient, Classical and Modern Israelite communities are demonstrated in complex system history.

The Aramaeans, Assyrians, and other related Mesopotamia ethnoclades are defined as a Shemitic sociocultural and
genetic group, with Jews and other proposed Hebrew sociocultural clades, hypothetically dating their origins
to Shem c. 2400 BCE per common Jewish Calendar, contemporaneous to exegetical Nimrod or Enshakushanna,
uniter of Northern and Southern Mesopotamia. In archaeohistorical terms the armies of Sargon's subsequent
historical Akkadian victory over the Neo-Sumerian cities formerly ruled by the successors of Enshakushanna,
including the holy dedicated Citadel 'Nippur', for the god of Wind and Energy enlil. The Hebrew Calendar is
proposed to have their origins in the post-Noahtic, Post-Diluvian Halaf and Hassuna-Shamarra eras of proto-Semitic
“Neolithic” Mesopotamia.

In the Standard Archaeohistory it is therefore proposed the hypothesis for shared pre-Noahtic, Pre-Diluvian proto-
Hebrew, proto-Semitic sociocultural and sociogenetic or late Neolithic founding populations for these early Semitic-
speaking nations predating the Sumerians, within the range of secular Shamar cultures from Mediterranean,
Southwest and South Asian founding Haplogroups G, J1, J2, and R1, and supra-Levantine Southwest Asian and
South Asian founder Haplogroups E1b1b, T, X, and U.

Furthermore, the antecedents of all of the Northern Mesopotamian and Southern Caucasian sociogenetic clades are
proposed to be “Neolithic-Era” cultures and populations, and as such contemporary to the culture complexes of the
region from whence Gobekli Tepe, and other Ante-Diluvian Northern Levantine and Caucasian Megalithic sites
originated and are tentatively corroborated in archaeological artifacts of Knowledge systems via the semi-
mythological Sumerian Kingship list and Seven Celestial Tablets of Anu or Mount Su’meru, and perhaps
contemporary to the Tower of Babel and Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.

Antedating these archaic Sumeric-Shamaran and Semitic calendrical systems for engineering, sciences, religio-
political and esoteric concern is a plethora of Archaeological evidence for Neolithic-Era cultures in the Northern
Levant region, which are likely sociogenetic ancestors to both later, contemporary Hebrews and the founding
sociogenetic sources for ancestral Semites. Furthermore it is generally proposed that the Era of human settlement
and inhabitation before the beginning of the Semitic calendar systems to be designated "Edenic" and "post-Edenic",
"post-Adamic", "pre-Diluvian, proto-Noahtic” Northern Levantine Mesolithic sociogenetic cultures including
proposed "post-Adamic, pre-Noahtic" sociogenesis within communities sharing Haplogroup mtDNA X and N
indicated secularly as Natufian sociocultural complexes.

2. An Origin of Hebrews to Israelites

Page 1 of 5
The sociogenetic predecessors to Abram, son of Terah's journey with Sarai, Keturah, Hagar, Isaac, and his extended
family and corps of Soldiery and Priests, and the establishment of a future Semitic and Hebraic clade, Hebrews and
Future Israelites after Jacob and his extended family[I][II] based upon revelatory, non-idolatrous Monotheistic
ethical Law, are proposed to have been Neo-Sumerian Hebrew, Hebrew-Semite or Hebrew-Semite-Sumerian
antecessors from the Ubaid sociocultural complex and industries of Sumeria-Mesopotamia antedating the Akkadian
era in city-states such as Nippur, Erech and Eridu.

Josephus in Antiquities of The Jews, Book 1., Chapter III indicated the Apovaterion, or city or location of the initial
place of descent of Noah's Ark, which was reputed to rest in Nachi-deshuan as a memorial for the newer future
descendants of Noah and his sons and their families. Compare Naxchi and the autonomous name for the Caucasian
peoples, including Chechens and Circassians. The purpose of organized cultural folkways and mores are proposed as
a basis of organized religion. The interlocution and language to the Divine is constructed, like the Tower of Babel, in
numerous ways to the purported Creator; the methods and means however differ entirely.

Further archaeology may present an earlier synchrony of sociocultural trade and transit across the Near Eastern
regions from the Nile headwaters, Levant, Arabia, Southwest Asia and the Indian subcontinent [Spice Trade routes
across Indian Ocean]. Historical evidence in Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian texts and records indicate a priestly,
engineering, architecting, or nomadic-learned and religious group or subgroups called Hebrews: Iviriim, Hapiru
[Egyptian], or Ibiru [Akkadian, Caucasian] perhaps originating from collected clades deriving
from Royal, Scholastic or Priesthood corps of the Kings, Military and City-builders of Ur.uk, Nippur, Haran of Neo-
Sumer, or the general Sumerian Priesthood religious class.

Hebrews, The Nation of Ever, and Hapiru are fundamentally synonymous. The Hapiru were probably named by the
Misraim [Misr-rim or Fen-Forders] because the Hapiru themselves called themselves the Nation of Ever [from
Shem] and Ford-Crossers. This theme is demonstrated in the Exodus account. Additionally Abraham is from or
began after the decline of the Akkadians and from the legacy of the interdynamics of Sumerians and Shemites, a
new branch on the continuum of Ur-Mesopotamian to Nile River sociodynamics, from Ur-Kurdish regions in
modern definitions. At his time the Hittites and their constituents were in the region of Ur.

However it is important to note that other groups were also recognized as of Shem, and Eber including the Kenim
[Yitrim] and Amurim, and not the Hittites and neither the Anakim, who are attributed to be of the non-Semitic,
Japhethic lines in the Mesopotamian ethnographic border regions of the Levant at that time, and a questionable line
of Anakim, who are only designated as a giant, autochthonous class of people. Hebrews, being sons of Eber, is
translated to mean “Ford-Crossers" and “Nomads” in the sociodynamic definition, and is a general designation,
Israelim are a specific designation of Semitic, Hebrew nomads. The non-Hebrews and non-Semites referred to them
as Hebrews in their own languages, just as Hebrews referred to Msri as Mitzrayim.

Hebron was sought by Abraham and his descendants for reasons demonstrated in the Torah-Tanach and Mishnah. As
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob planned for the future, the pattern of building toward the Exodus is well known regarding
the aliyah to the land of Israel. Many historians do not look at the macrodynamic or historical statistics and complex
systems that comprise the discipline of history however their laudable efforts must be coordinated with other
specialists.

It is proposed Ibiru or Nipiru are from whence modern English may derive the etymology Hebrew for "Beyonders-
Who-Pass-Through-or-Over"; "Forders or River-Wind-Energy-Channel-Controllers” [Author Lissner].

As the branches of the various Levantine peoples interacted and developed, the Knowledge systems and traditions
of each group and subgroup also developed new ontologies. These autochthonous Kurdish [Kardi, Corduene, Guti,
Qurdi] and proto-Kurdish religions of Yazdanism demonstrate proto-Hebraic North Levantine and Zagro-Caucasian
sociocultural traditions and beliefs of solar-lunar influence and resurrection of reincarnation. The proto-group or
subgroups of Mesopotamian City-state Priesthood-Dynasty, Magi or "Learned Sages or Monks" of various
pantheons or creeds existed circa 2500 BCE, or predating this time perhaps to c. 3770 BCE or the start of the Jewish
Calendar or c. 4770 BCE or the start of the Assyrian calendar for a calendrical origin of the Sumerian City-State.

It is proposed these hypothetically originated in common socio-genetic origins of all Hebrew nations from proto-
Semitic, "Sumerian" Mesolithic Caucasian and Northern Mesopotamian populations and explanations in syncretistic
religion for the natural world. The direct origins of the specific Hebrew Language are at least 3,000 years old, dating
to circa Exodus and share syntactic and semantic morphology with antecedent Phoenician, Ugaritic and earlier
proto-Northwest Semitic and Caucasian languages, cuneiform and alphanumerics.

3. Genetic Evidence Surmounts Historical Debate of Ethnocultural Cladic Origins of Claimaints to Hebrew,
Israelite or Jewish Ancestry

The development of genetic testing for haplogroup type and methodology for determining ancestral origins of ethnic
groups, and verification to socioculture, history and lore, has allowed for a greater degree of accuracy to determine
the real genetic claimants to proto-Hebrew, Hebrew founding populations, and subsequent evolution of cladistics
and dispersion into global Israelite, Judaic, and Jewish sociocultural subclades to demonstrate this hypothesis.

3.1 Similarity between Hebrew, Israelite, Jewish Chronological haplogroup clades and closest Ethnocultural
groups in geography or migration history

Genetical and Historical Research Data from 2009-2010 tests [Vide "Genomic microsatellites identify shared Jewish
ancestry intermediate between Middle Eastern and European populations”, Kopelman, Stone, et. al.] and research by
E. Levy-Coffman, i.e. "A Mosaic of People: The Jewish Story and a Reassessment of The DNA Evidence”, have
demonstrated that in addition to minimal shared relations between modern Jewish and North African, Asian and
European genetic signatures, the socio-genetic Hebrew family includes a Genesis from proposed proto-Hebrews,
and inclusive of post-Hebrew Israelite and Judean or Jewish Haplogroup Clades.

Page 2 of 5
These clades include Levantine mountain-based populations of Caucasians and Kurds [Vide "The Y Chromosome of
Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East”, Nebel, Filon, et. al.]. Ashkenaz Levites furthermore
retain Y-DNA sequences very similar to Kurdish gentiles. Genetic inheritance commonalities are studied in Nebel,
et. al., "High-resolution Y Chromosome haplotypes of Israeli Arabs reveal geographic substructure and substantial
overlap with haplotypes of Jews”.

It is likely that Ashkenazim, named in the early Medieval era to denote Jewish interdynamics in Central and Eastern
Europe and across Western Asia between Ashkenazim and Mitzrachi Jewish populations1 [including Khazaria; also
vide Khazar Correspondence letters; Yiddish language2 3], for the Kurdo-Parthian Empire "Ashkuza" after the defeat
of the Persian Empire by Mordechai, Ester, and Ahasuerus, had cultural similarities to contemporary Sephardim in
Iberia, and Mitzrahim from Babylonia and Syria, although there have been numerous citations for Ashkenaz in-
migration and intermarriage with Sephardi populations in pre-Inquisition Iberia [c.f. Kievian Letter; Schechter
Letter], and some out-migration of Sephardim and Mitzrahim to Jewish regions of Europe.4 5

Since 2006, and certainly before [Nebel, et. al., 2001] c. 2009 in the paper, "Genomic microsatellites identify shared
Jewish ancestry intermediate between Middle Eastern and European populations”, Nebel, Filon, et. al., and "The Y
Chromosome of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East”6 the gradations of genetic similarity
between all contemporary Jews, and their contemporary Near Eastern neighbors, including Levantine Arabs, Kurds
and Adyghe, are measured still closer to one another than to their neighboring populations, including Italkim,
Ashkenazim and Mizrahim.

The genetic distance from classical era Jews and their Near Eastern neighbors was not measured. All Kurds and
Jews also have a very high genetic correspondence as do Jews and Southern and Southeast European gentile
sociogenetic populations studied.7 Furthermore the lineage of Sephardim may include Berbers or Carthaginians, in
low infiltrations due to the length of duration of their colonies in Iberian regions. However, Italkim have been
demonstrated to have the highest genetic correspondence to Ashkenazim c. 2010.8 Moreover, common to all modern
Jewish populations are the c. 5%++ North, and East African genetic contributions to Hebrew, Israelite and Jewish
populations, especially until c. 100 CE and the global Exile from Israel.9

Therefore it is certain that very few Russian migrants from before the Communist Era, have very much more mixed
ancestry, than Italkim. Some contemporary Russian migrants, let alone Italian or Sephardic migrants from Latin
America with mixed Latino-Jewish ancestry, are studied before Aliyah and their mixed lineage is noted as parentage
of converts or Gerim, making it unlikely that even small groups of total, pre-1920 Italian or Russian Jews, are of a
strong mixed ancestry, if they have kept their lineage from Judaic or Israeli exile genetic founding populations in
their current nations of landing all of which sharing strong Near Eastern Y- and MtDNA lines.

3.2 Table I. Geographical Regions and Exogamous Ethnographic Groups with Highest Percentage Total of
Proposed Proto-Hebrew to Hebrew, Israelite and Judean Haplogroup Diffusion of Clades G, J1, J2, R1a, T,
E1b1b (Y-DNA) in Europe, Africa and Asia

Defined All Haplogroup Clades from Y-DNA G, J1, J2, R1a, E3b, T are represented in Hebrew, Israelite, Judean,
Jewish and Closest Exogamous Groups:

Where Southwest Asian (S) = Founding populations of Southwest Asian Late Paleolithic to Neolithic subgroups
Where Aboriginal (A) = Founding populations of Late Paleolithic to Neolithic subgroups
Where Converso (C) = Notable presence of Converso Hebrew, Israelite or Jewish populations within selected
Ethnogroup
Where Hebrew (H) = Original Levantine-Near Eastern sociogenetic dispersion from c. +4000 to 1000 BCE =
Abraham-Isaac-Jacob Israel-Egypt, Levant
Where Israelite (I) =Second sociogenetic dispersion from 1000 to 0 CE = Israelite Diaspora from Joshua to Assyrian
Exile to Roman Exile-Judeans
Where Judean or Jewish (J) = 0 CE to c. 2000 CE = Third Sociogenetic dispersion of Judeans or later Ashkenazim,
Italkim, Sephardim, Temonim, et. al.

1Annotated footnote Costa, et. al., 2013. “A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages”,
Nature Communications 4 Article Number 2543

2 Annotated footnote “DNA sat nav uncovers ancient Ashkenaz”, extracted

3 Annotated footnote Das, Wexler, Pirooznia, Elhaik, 2016. “Localizing Ashkenazic Jews to primeval villages in the ancient
Iranian lands of Ashkenaz”, Genome Biology and Evolution Advance Access

4 Annotated footnote Zeldes, 2010. “Legal Status of Jewish Converts to Christianity in Southern Italy and Provence”, California
Italian Studies 1, 1

5 Annotated footnote “The Jews of Termini Imerse: The Neofiti”, extracted

6Annotated footnote Nebel, et. al., 2001. “The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle
East”, extracted

7Annotated footnote Kopelman, et. al. 2009. “Genomic microsatellites identify shared Jewish ancestry intermediate between
Middle Eastern and European populations”, Biomedcentral

8 Annotated footnote “Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity”, extracted

9 Annotated footnote Moorjani, et. al., 2011. “The History of African Gene Flow into Southern Europeans, Levantines, and
Jews”, PLOS Genetics

Page 3 of 5
Where + = Most common weighted genetic similarity between stated Ethnographic Group of said Clades and
(H, I, J)
Where - = Least common weighted genetic similarity between stated Ethnographic Group of said Clades and
(H, I, J)
Where ' = Sociogenetic bivalence or in-migration and out-migration patterns between adjacent Ethnographic Groups
of said Clades
Where Boldface and Italicized Haplogroup population = Closest outlying Ethnographic Group of said Clades to (H,
I, J)
Where JA = Jewish Ashkenazi or most similar
Where JS = Jewish Sephardi or most similar
Where JM = Jewish Mitzrachi or most similar

3.3 Table II. Results

Southwest Asia, Levant (Extant): Kurds (A, +H, I, JA, C) Druze10(H, I, JA) Syrians (H, I, J) Lebanese (H, I, J)
Beduin (H, I, J) Israeli Arabs (H, I, JA, C) Aramaens (H) Assyrians (H, I, JA), Saudis (H, I, J, C)
Southwest Asia, Levant (Defunct): Akkadians (+H, I), Phoenicians (+H, I), Hyksos (+H, I) Edomites (+H, I, J)
Moabites (H, I)
Mediterranean Islands (Extant): Greek Cypriots (H, I, JA, C), Greek Cretans (H, I, J, C) Maltese (H, I, J, C)
Sardinians (H, +I, JA) Sicilians (JA, C)
Caucasus Region (Extant): Georgians (+H, I, JA, C) Armenians (+H, I, J, C) Naxchi, Kumyk, Avars, Adyghe-
Cherkess (S,+H, I, JA, C) Ossetians (S, H, I, JA)
Caucasus Region (Defunct): Parthians, Avars, Cumans, Khazars, Ghuzz, Oghuz, Gajar, Gurjar (H, I, J)
Continental Europe (Extant): Greeks-Macedonians (H, I, JA) Greeks-Laconians [Spartans] (A, H, I) Hungarians-
Selected (I, JA11, C) Italians-Tuscans (I, JA) -Calabrians (I, JA, C) French-Bayonne (JS, C) -Strasbourg (JS, C)
Nederlands-Amsterdam (JS, C) Balkans: Serbians, Dalmatians (I, J, C) Spanish- Selected (I, JA, JS C) Portuguese-
Selected (I, JA, JS C) Krimean Karaim (I, J) Romani12 (H, I, JM, C), Kalmyk (J, C)13 14
North Africa (Extant): Egyptians, Tunisians, Moroccans, Various Amazigh, Touareg (A, H, I, JA)
East Africa (Extant): Beta Israel, Beta Avraham, Qemant, Yibir-Somaliland (A, H, I, JA, JM C)
West Asia Persians (J, C), Kurds (H, I, J, C)
Central Asia (Extant): Pashtun (H, I, JA, JM C) Kashmiri (H) Baluch (-H)
Central Asia (Defunct): Epthalites, Pactrians, Gandaharans, Indo-Parthians (I, J)
South Asia (Extant): Chitpavan Brahmins (I, J), Malabari Nasranis (I, JM, C), Gurjar (I, JM, C)
East Asia (Extant): Kaifeng Jews (JM), Various Malay, Phillipino (J, C)
North America (Extant): Exogamous Intermarriage; Endogamous Intermarriage: Accadian, Cajun, Cherokee,
Hugenot, Melungeons, Mennonite, Amish, Anabaptists, LDS Mormons, Sephardim and Ashkenazim Conversos
(JA, JS C')
Central America (Extant): Sephardim and Ashkenazim Conversos (JA, JS C’)
South America (Extant): Sephardim and Ashkenazim Conversos (JA, JS C')

3.3.1 Notes. Caucasus: Specifically the Adyghe or "Circassian" people have portions of genetic inheritance which
match Ante-Diluvian, Neolithic populations in the South Caucasus and may share a common origin with proto-
Hebrew, proto-Semitic ancestors of modern Jews, Armenians, Aramaens, Assyrians, Georgians, Nakchi and Kurds.

3.3.2 Notes. Continental Europe: Jewish ancestry in Sephardim, Italkim-Judean and Ashkenazim can be traced
through mapping and comparing Haplogroup Y and Mtdna of Gentile populations in Europe to all Jewish
populations in Europe including extant major European cities of past Jewish settlement, cited to possibly correspond
to assimilated all former Jewish community descendants in modern groups having such partial or notable majority
Jewish ancestry.

3.3.3 Notes. Continental Europe: Vide Bayonne [Mostly Sephardim - Conversos], Amsterdam [Mostly Sephardim
- Conversos], Rhineland communities, e.g. Cologne, Strassbourg, Dusseldorf [Judean, Sephardim, Ashkenazim],
Southern France Huguenot communities, and Northwest Italian Waldensian communities, Swiss and Bohemian
Anabaptist communities [Amish, Mennonite, Hussite, Hutterite, J, C, Judean, Sephardim, Ashkenazim] and,
Moscow, Warsaw, Krakow, Ljubljana [J, C, Mostly Ashkenazim]. Also vide "The Genome-Wide Structure of The
Jewish people", Behar, et. al.

3.3.4 Notes. Near East and Levant: Vide converso or intermarried populations in Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia,
Egypt, Lebanon, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Yemen. Israelite, Judean to
contemporary Jewish migrations in Europe, Near East and Levant compose mainly endogenous communities. Also
vide "Jewish and non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations share a common pool of Y-chromasone biallelic
haplotypes", Hammer, et. al. and "The 185delAG BRCA1 Mutation Originated before the Dispersion of Jews in the
Diaspora and Is Not Limited to Ashkenazim", Bar-Sade, et. al.; "Genome-Wide Diversity in the Levant Reveals
Recent Structuring by Culture", Haber, et. al. In some genetic testing measurements, some Ashkenazi, Sephardi or
Mitzrahi genetic signatures are equated essentially as being matches or the same, from one group to another, even if
the geographic origins of each signature are geographically or culturally distant from the main [tested] signature.

10 Annotated footnote Shlush, et. al., 2008. “The Druze: A Population Genetic Refugium of the Near East”, PLOS One

11 Annotated footnote “Hungarians show highest rate of Ashkenazi genes after Israelis, company says”, extracted

12 Annotated footnote Thomas, et. al. 1998. “Origins of Old Testament priests”, Nature 394 138-140

13 Annotated footnote “Kalmyks: Religion”, extracted

14 Annotated footnote “The Kalmyk-Cossack Subbotniki: “The Khan’s Warriors” convert while living in Belarus”, extracted

Page 4 of 5
3.3.5 Notes. North America: Populations of Jews and Crypto-Jews in USA and Canada reflect migrations since
1492 and include all of the groups in 3.1.

3.3.6 Notes. Central America: Populations of Jews and Crypto-Jews reflect migrations since 1492 and include all
of the groups in 3.1.

3.3.7 Notes. South America: Populations of Jews and Crypto-Jews reflect migrations since 1492 and include all of
the groups in 3.1.

4. Results Summary: Shemitic+Hebrew+Israelite Ancestry

An estimation of the majority of the Israelites and Jews in contemporary times seem to indicate a majority of mixed
liturgy-rite, and sociogenetic inheritance to Ashkenazi and Mitzrachi migrations and ancestry from the Second Exile
circa 2,000 to 1500 YBP, with a significant minority of mixed Ashkenazi and Sephardi, and Sephardi ancestry
migrations from the global Iberian Migrations circa 500 YBP.

[Author] The Hebrews and the Torah originate from Shem and Eber more than 4,000 years ago, when Abraham and
Sarah, and his Wives began the foundation for a great new family of G-D-based peoples into the far future,
thereafter Abraham, Isaac and Jacob-Israel, Joseph, David and Solomon's travels from the Levant to Africa and Asia
by 3,000 years before our time. Sociocultural traditions and scientific testing of peoples in the Americas, Africa, and
Asia are in this hypothesis, confirming, reinforcing and vastly expanding the Hebrew-Israelite family of peoples
including Israelites and Jews, should they be proven to have an important percentage or haplogroup of Y-DNA and
MtDNA as well as relevant oral or folk traditions.

To test purported claims of having a percentage of recent [c. 100 years] or historical [100-500 years] Jewish, or
earlier [500+ year] Jewish or more remote Shemitic+Hebrew+Israelite [2000+ year] ancestry, Seed of Israel are
defined here on a high-side average from those peoples possessing approximately 12.5%+ [1/8] on average of
Israelite, Judean or Recent Jewish ancestry [From 20 generations or c. 500 years], from within the given medial
population total estimates:

4.1 Table III. Results Summary: Shemitic+Hebrew+Israelite Ancestry

Greater Europe — European Intermarried or Conversos [c. 25 millions]

North Africa — Intermarried or Conversos [c. 20 millions]
Central Asia — Pashtun, Baluch, Kashmiri regions [c. 70 millions]
Mesopotamia — [c. 50 millions]
Kurdish regions — [c. 40 millions]
Arabian regions — [c. 40 millions]
Persian regions — [c. 40 millions]
South Asia — Indian populations [c. 10 millions]
Eastern Mediterranean Levant — Cypriots, Druze, Aramaens, Mandaens, Chaldeans, Nestorians, Lebanese [c. 10+
millions]
Anatolians [c. 50 millions]
Balkans [c. 20 millions]
Caucasus [c. 10 millions]
Romani Gypsies [c. 15 millions]
New World — Sephardic Crypto-Jews, Sephardic-Ashkenazi mixed Crypto-Jews, Ashkenazi Crypto-Jews [c. 25
millions]

These groups are as defined by the Law of Return at 25% or more Israelite, Judean and more specifically, Recent
Jewish ancestry [From 20 generations or c. 500 years], and are estimated utilizing this methodology. This world total
equals to an estimation at c. 425 million, as of 2024. From that total, an unknown smaller percentage have 25% [1/4]
or more Jewish ancestry are eligible for genetic inheritance based upon the Israeli Law of Return. Additionally, it is
estimated by the Author [Jonah Lissner] currently c. 35+ millions Jews and those with Jewish ancestry from 1 to 4
generations previous to present are eligible to become Israeli citizens based upon the Israeli Law of Return. In terms
of magnitude of numbers added to a principally or essentially endogamous social group, even if only a more realistic
33%, of the total c. 425 million at this time is tested to be valid descendents of Hebrew-Israelites with notable
Jewish or Israelite origin from founding population or subsequent intermarriage patterns, some percentage [c. 33%]
of c. 425 million people [= c. 140.25+ million] from the current total mean estimate, compared to the contemporary
total specific Jewish population of 35+ million Jews or Very Recent Jewish ancestors [From 1 to 4 generations].

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

I. Lissner, Jonah, 2024. Classical to Medieval Macrodynamics of Israelite Socioculture In West and Central Asia,
ResearchGate
II. Lissner, Jonah, 2024. The Empire Of Zion: Toward A Levantine Union Of Solomonic Peoples, ResearchGate

Page 5 of 5