Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Commerce and Christianity
Commerce and Christianity
Slogan
Author(s): Andrew Porter
Source: The Historical Journal , Sep., 1985, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Sep., 1985), pp. 597-621
Published by: Cambridge University Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Historical Journal
ANDREW PORTER
King's College, London
"'What," some simple-minded man might say, "is the connection between
the Gospel and commerce?""'1 Speaking in Leeds in May i86o on behalf of
the Universities' Mission to Central Africa, Bishop Samuel Wilberforce was
characteristically robust with his rhetorical question and no less direct in
furnishing the answer. 'There is a great connection between them. In the first
place, there is little hope of promoting commerce in Africa, unless Christianity
is planted in it; and, in the next place, there is very little ground for hoping
that Christianity will be able to make its proper way unless we can establish
a lawful commerce in the country'. Britain's part in forging the connexion
was abundantly clear. It was
the intention of God to make it the interest of this, the most active, the most ingenious,
and the freest people on the face of the earth, to be up and doing, and to be in earnest
in the far more important work of spreading His Gospel throughout the world. Was
it written in vain by the prophet, 'and the ships of Tarshish first'? Was it not meant
that God had given us our commerce and our naval supremacy - that industry, that
patience which had enabled us to subdue the earth wherever we had settled.. .our
wealth, with our mutual trust in each other, that we might as the crowning work of
all these blessings, be the instruments of spreading the truths of the Gospel from one
end of the earth to the other?
Of course the answer was yes, for, as the Bishop argued, drawing examples
from the early history of the Christian church, the connexion rested on a dual
principle. 'The providence of God.. .has ordained that when Christianity is
placed in any great centre, it should be borne everywhere by the natural power
of commerce itself.. .commerce.. .is intended to carry, even to all the world,
the blessed message of salvation '.2 Just as commerce furthered Christianity,
so the reverse was also true. Christianity, according to Wilberforce, has 'the
* Earlier versions of this article were presented at the University of Sheffield, the University
of Aberdeen, and the Imperial History Seminar in the Institute of Historical Research, University
of London. I am very grateful to Dr Clyde Binfield and Professor Andrew Walls for their help
and hospitality, and to seminar members for their comments and criticisms, in particular Penny
Carson for information about sources.
I Samuel Wilberforce, Speeches on missions, ed. Rev. Henry Rowley (London, I874), p. 213.
2 Ibid. p. 212, speech at Leeds, 25 May i86o.
597
effect of training the human race to a degree of excellence which it could never
attain in non-Christian countries', giving 'value to life', 'dignity to labour'
and 'security to possession', with the result that a Christian people would
tend to be 'a wealth-producing people, an exporting people and so a
commercial people'.3
In a notable recent article, Dr Brian Stanley has argued that the pattern
of thinking illustrated in these excerpts from Wilberforce's speech was very
common among mid-Victorians. The beliefs in God's providence, divine
contrivance, and benevolent design, the fundamental identity of duty and
self-interest, were, he suggested, the main components of a theological system
dominating evangelical reactions to the world about them. It was this set of
beliefs which 'enabled early Victorian Christians to regard the association of
commerce and Christianity as.. .a natural and harmonious alliance'. 'The
facility with which [they] coupled together commerce and Christianity is
explicable.. primarily in terms of the providentialism which dominated
nineteenth-century evangelical thought.'4 Stanley argues that these beliefs
were clearly expressed on numerous occasions in the i 840s and i 850s - at the
time of the Anglo-Chinese wars, in connexion with David Livingstone's
journey across Africa and his spell in Britain in I857, and above all as the
result of the Indian Mutiny. To avoid a repetition of the Mutiny, to make
the most of the new openings into China and Africa, to fulfil God's purpose
for the world, it was necessary that - in Livingstone's words - 'Those two
pioneers of civilization - Christianity and commerce - should ever be
inseparable'.5 The peak of missionary confidence and perhaps too of commercial
support for missions, the imperialism of the Gospel and of Free Trade, went
hand in hand.
This is an attractive argument, and Stanley has produced a wealth of
supporting illustration. Moreover, it is a type of analysis, one resting heavily
on assumptions about both the degree of autonomy to be attributed to ideas,
and the primacy of theological or intellectual beliefs in determining the
pattern of missionary action, which has been used elsewhere in writing about
late nineteenth-century missionary motivation.6 However, this article explores
the connexions which rnissionary supporters made between commerce and
Christianity over a longer period, and with more specific reference to
particular areas of missionary activity. It argues that if this is done, it becomes
increasingly difficult to accept an appeal to providentialist theology as the
principal factor in mid-Victorian arguments linking commerce with Chris-
3 Il)id.
4 B. Stanley, '"Commerce and Christianity": providenice theory, the missionary movement,
and the imperialism of free trade, I84.2-I 86o', Historical Jouirnal, 26 (I983), 72, 93.
5 Rev. William Monk (ed.), Dr Livingstone's Cambridge lectures (Cambridge, I858), pp. I9-2I;
Stanley, p. 93.
6 Andr-ew Porter, 'Cambridge, Keswick, and late nineteenith century attitudes to Africa',
Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, v (1976-7), 5-34; idem, 'Evangelical enthusiasm,
missionary motivationi, and West Africa in the late nineteenth cenitury: the career of G. W. Brooke',
ibid. vi (I977--8), 23-46.
tianity. The suggestion is made that far more significance ought to be attached
to the cumulative experience which societies acquired in the mission fields,
to the contrasting conditions under which missionaries had to work, and to
changes in the nature of British society. These produced marked variations
in the willingness of men to accept either the possibility or the necessity of
linking Christianity and commerce in any direct way, despite their common
theological persuasion.
The missionary movement of the late eighteenth century was not only the
product of the enthusiasm of the evangelical revival, but gathered strength
within a context provided by debate about the meaning of civilization and
especially the possibility of civilizing, or improving the conditions of,
non-European peoples. By the end of the century there was very little doubt
as to the actual characteristics of civilization; Britain's own culture and
institutions provided the yardstick. Already by the I 76os, Adam Smith had
established the progressive stages through which human societies advanced
to their culmination in 'the commercial age'. Under the influence of Scottish
writers, it became steadily more conventional to assume that with progress
in commerce came political sophistication. Development of the political arts
meant good government, order, and the liberty of individuals. Britain's
pre-eminence in commerce and industry produced moral benefits too, for these
pursuits provided 'bulwarks against passions, vice and weakness'.7 In matters
of faith and ethics, Christianity embodied the peak of religious perfection, a
point on which even Sydney Smith could speak for almost everyone. 'We
believe that we are in possession of a revealed religion; that we are exclusively
in possession of a revealed religion; and that the possession of that religion
can alone confer immortality, and best confer present happiness.'8 Such
pre-eminence and good fortune were very widely felt to create obligations to
less fortunate societies. By i8oo, there were few who took an uncritical or
broadly tolerant view of non-European societies, fewer still who admired their
achievements. The duty of benevolence was enjoined on both religious and
secular grounds: its fulfilment necessitated the civilization of the peoples of
Africa and Asia. There were, not unnaturally, sceptics and others who
ridiculed any such attempts. The general result, however, in the words of the
Eclectic Review, was that 'The melioration of the condition of the human race,
in every form, never employed so great a number of active and benevolent
minds, as at the present time. ..one directs his views to one object, and another
to another... but all unite in endeavours to augment the sum of human felicity.'9
7 P. J. Marshall and G. Williams, The great map of mankind: British perceptions of the zvorld in the
age of enlightenment (London, I982), pp. I 47, I 49.
8 Edinburgh Review, xiI (April I 8o8), 15 I-8 I, 'Publications respecting Indian Missions', p. I 70.
9 Eclectic Review, I (October I805), 762, in reviewing Indian recreations by the Rev. William
Tennant.
could be grasped by human beings who were everywhere the same. After his
experience of contrasting Scottish parishes, Thomas Chalmers was convinced
that 'There is no controverting the existence of a moral sense in the rudest
of barbarians.. .in all countries you have a ground upon which you can
enter.'15 Nevertheless, even while many evangelicals tended to argue that
Christianity could perfectly well precede civilization, there was certainly no
clear feeling that it should necessarily do so.
These discussions, in so far as Christians were involved, took place within
the framework of providentialist theology. This was the world of Bishop
Butler's Analogy, Archdeacon Paley's Evidences of Christianity, and William
Wilberforce's Practical view of religion. Yet commerce and Christianity were
regarded as essentially separate issues, and were not linked together in the way
that was to become common fifty years later. Commerce, particularly foreign
trade, was a fundamental characteristic of a civilized society, but 'civilization'
which lay at the centre of the general concern was felt both to comprise far
more than commercial activity and to be clearly distinguishable from
Christianity. The understanding of commerce above all as the exchange of
primary produce or raw materials for manufactures, and the identification
of such a system of exchange as a prime factor in the dissemination and support
of Christianity among non-Europeans, were not features of late eighteenth-
and early nineteenth-century debates about evangelization. In I 792 the
Baptist missionary William Carey was quite as struck by Isaiah's reference
to 'the ships of Tarshish' as was Samuel Wilberforce, but he saw far less
immediate relevance in it. 'This seems to imply that in the time of the glorious
increase of the church, in the latter days, (of which the whole chapter is
undoubtedly a prophecy,) commerce shall subserve the spread of the
gospel.. navigation, especially that which is commercial, shall be the means of
carrying on the work of God...'"6 For the time being, however, Carey saw
in the adventurousness of the trader evidence that heathen territories were
closer than one might think, and a reproof to Christians who nevertheless
preferred to turn their backs on the wider world, rather than an auxiliary
for the contemporary evangelist.17 So too, newly founded missionary societies
like the London Missionary Society and the Church Missionary Society were
at pains to dissociate themselves as much from commercial activity as from
any involvement in 'political' matters.18 To appreciate more fully some of the
reasons for this, it is useful to look at the examples of India and Sierra Leone
as important subjects of evangelical concern.
15 W. J. Roxborough, 'Thomas Chalmers and the mission of the Church with special reference
to the rise of the missionary movement in Scotland' (Aberdeen, Ph.D. thesis, 1978), pp. 307, 359.
16 William Carey, An enquiry into the obligations of Christians, to use meansfor the conversion of the heathens
(Leicester, 1792), p. 68. The biblical reference is to Isaiah, ch. lx, verse 9.
17 Ibid. pp. 67, 81-2.
18 David Bogue, 'Objections against a mission to the heathen, stated and considered', Sermons
preached in London at theformation of the missionary society (London, 1795), pp. 132-3; the published
Instructions of the committee of the Church Missionary Society and Proceedings of the Church Missionary Society
when missionaries left for the field are full of warnings on these questions.
II
On Indian questions the views of Charles Grant, first a servant and later
director of the East India Company, may stand for many. He seems always
to have accepted the maxim that benevolence, whether in the promotion of
good government or in fair trading, brought reflex benefits. Following his
conversion in i 776, his faith in the company as an agent of improvement and
civilization continued to grow; but so too did his conviction that good laws
and decent customs were of no use without the integrity and moral discipline
which Christianity alone could produce in those who directed or lived under
the company's administration. He became increasingly critical of the company's
past policies on the grounds that the value of its work had been totally
undermined by its lack of concern with Christian teaching even for its own
employees, and its effective prohibition of missionary activity among Muslims
and Hindus. By I792 Grant was clear in his own mind that the civilization
and reformation of Indian society was not only necessary, but entailed nothing
less than the steady introduction of the whole of Western learning.19 He pressed
increasingly for the dissemination of Christianity, notjust as a body of doctrine
or collection of sublime truths, but as the essential ingredient required to bind
western ways and culture together. His strategy was education, his medium
the English language, and missionaries his agents. Missionaries he also
defended not for any contribution which they might make to economic
advance, but for their cultivation of the sense of community and common
values between rulers and ruled: nothing could do more to secure Britain's
government in India. Grant wholeheartedly opposed the expansion of
commerce which many proposed to achieve by opening India to all traders.
Preservation of the East India Company's monopoly, the restriction of trade,
was essential, for it supported the company's administrative structure, the only
agency capable of encouraging religion and so of changing India for the better.
He was prepared to admit that 'moral improvement would lead to economic
improvement and help our commerce', but trade in any direct sense was
irrelevant to the propagation of his faith.20 In his mind conversion had almost,
one might say, driven out trade.
Why did evangelicals feel commerce of so little importance to their work
in India? If Grant were alone in his views he might be dismissed as someone
concerned simply to reconcile his religious opinions with a vested interest in
the company's own chances of profit. His suggestion that missionaries
contributed to security might be written off as another instance of the facility
with which evangelicals and humanitarians attempted to win wide support
19 Charles Grant, Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Gr-eat Britain, wri
in I792, printed in P.P. I83I-2, VIII (734), Repor-tfr-om the select comminittee on the affairs of the
India Comnpany, General Appendix I.
20 A. T. Embree, Charles Grant and British r-ule in India (London, I963), pp. 47, i i8, I42-4, and
passim; Grant, Observations, p. 88.
21 Cf. the argument in R. T. Anstey, The Atlantic slave trade and British abolition, I760-
(London, I975), ch. I4; and Thomas Chalmers, The uitility of missions ascertained by exper-ience
edn, Edinburgh, i8i6), p. I9.
22 See the petitions from supporters of missionaries in I 8I 3, Parliamentary Debates, xxv a
23 Parliamentary Debates, XXVI, 453, 3I May I8I3, speech by Grant.
24 Ibid. xxv, I092-3, 28 April I8I3, Petition of elders and ministers of the provincial synod
of Glasgow.
25 Ibid. 8 I 7-I 8, I 4 April I 8 I 3, petition.
26 Ibid. xxvi, 832-3, 22 June I813-
of course true that missionaries suffered from an especially bad press early in
the nineteenth century. Sydney Smith's reference to 'little detachments of
maniacs... benefiting us much more by their absence than the Hindoos by their
advice' was only remarkable in being more stylish than the general run of
abuse.27 Missionaries certainly needed to defend their own character and the
reasonableness of their brand of religion. Moreover, uncertainty as to the
outcome of the Charter revision compelled evangelicals to avoid arguments
which might antagonize trading interests on either side. Representations in
favour of an educational strategy were arguably calculated to do both.
However, there was more to this distancing of Christianity and the
missionary cause from commerce than either an historical assessment of India's
progress or calculations of immediate political expediency. Although practical
caution may have prompted supporters of missions to India to present their
case in ways which played down links between the expansion of commerce
and that of Christianity, even on occasions when connexions were made it was
with a view to assisting or justifying the missionary presence rather than
drawing out any direct instrumental connexion between conversion and
economic pursuits.28 Wilberforce himself called reluctantly for an alliance with
commercial interests in order to destroy the restrictive powers of the East India
Company, not because he expected the diffusion of Christianity to be assisted
by freer trade.29 In fact the case had gone against any such link for two main
reasons. On the one hand, circumstances were such that prospects for the
expansion of British trade with India were widely regarded as poor or even
non-existent. On the other, few who believed in a rosy commercial future saw
in the introduction of Christianity a sufficient condition for growth: India's
stunted development was the product of the East India Company's monopoly,
and only its abolition could open the way for expansion. It was thus possible
for both commercial pessimists and optimists to believe that Christianity and
civilization might flourish apart from commerce, and that the best means of
promoting Christianity were independent of trade.
Lord Teignmouth, for example, had no doubt that entry for missionaries
into the company's territory was desirable, that conversion was possible, and
that the introduction of Christianity 'would tend to the improvement of [the
Hindus'] civil condition'. But when asked if an improved civil and moral
condition 'would tend to increase their consumption of the various manu-
factures of their own or of any other country', he was certain it would not.30
27 Edinburgh Review, xii (April I8o8), I79-80; cf. Parliamentary Register, XVIII, 685, I I June I802,
speech by General Gascoyne on Sierra Leone.
28 Claudius Buchanan at the C.M.S. Anniversary Meeting, i8io, quLoted in G. Bearce, British
attitudes towards India, I784-i858 (Oxford, I96I), p. 82; Grant in his Observations, talking of the
diffusion of 'our religion and knowledge' as 'the noblest species of conquest', added 'and
wherever, we may venture to say, our principles and language are introduced, ouLr commerce
will follow.', P.P. I83I-2, VIII (734), General Appendix I, p. 88.
29 R. I. Wilberforce and S. Wilberforce, The life of William Wilberforce (5 vols., London, I838),
IV, I4, diary entry, I4 February I8I2.
30 P.P. I8 I2-I3, VII I8. Lord Teignmouth, previously SirJohn Shore, governor-general in India,
I793-8, servant of the East India Company I769-89, and member of the Board of Control
I807-28.
He and many others who gave evidence to the parliamentary inquiry into the
affairs of the East India Company argued that the reason for the limited trade
of India and the company's own losses lay chiefly in the poverty of Indians,
their lack of purchasing power, and the absence of any actual need for
European goods.31 Economic facts of life rather than the religious and moral
state of India's inhabitants governed the levels of trade.
If the promotion of Christianity would not further trade, neither did
expanding trade promise or depend on religious conversion. Grenville put the
anti-monopolist view that trade once opened would perpetuate itself unaided.
In his view neither Hinduism nor Islam were barriers to commerce, and such
obstacles as existed required not a religious transformation but the divorce
of secular sovereignty from commercial monopoly.
That freer trade had little to offer the evangelicals seemed to be further
confirmed by first-hand experience. Even the most enthusiastic Baptists had
found themselves drawn rapidly into teaching and the scholarly work of
translation and publishing. Moreover, such economic activities as they became
involved in seem to have had little connexion with trade. Their concern was
overwhelmingly with poor relief, and the encouragement of subsistence
through limited agricultural improvements.33 It is therefore not surprising to
find evangelicals, well before the great debate on the East India Company in
I813, firmly convinced as to the only worthwhile methods. Discussing two
of a series of dissertations 'on the best Means of Civilizing the Subjects of the
British Empire in India, and of diffusing the light of the Christian Religion
throughout the Eastern World', the Eclectic Review was gratified 'that both
the present writers, though of different national establishments, concur... in the
opinion we formerly intimated, that it is from the united measures of
circulating the scriptures, and of employing suitable missionaries, [by which
was meant well-trained educated men] that we most reasonably may hope
for the advancement of Christianity in the Eastern World'.34 Preaching and
31 Parliamentary Debates, xxv, 493-500, 527-32, 648-56, April I8I3, evidence of Thomas Graham,
and Major-Gen. Alexander Kyd; ibid. XXVI, 436, May I813, evidenlce of Mr Bruce.
32 Ibid. xxv, 739-40, April I8I3.
33 E. D. Potts, British Baptist missionaries inl India, i793-i837 (Cambridge, I967), pp. 70-4;
K. Ingham, Reformers in India, i793-i833: ail accozunt of the work of C/lristian inzssionaries oil behalf
of social reform (Cambridge, I 956).
34 Eclectic Review, ii (July i8o6), 536.
III
In the case of Sierra Leone, despite the direct commercial interest and
missionary concern of its evangelical promoters, a similar pattern of attitudes
can be discerned: there emerged no instrumental connexion between commerce
and Christianity. After the failure of Granville Sharpe's project for resettling
poor blacks in a self-sufficient self-governing 'Province of Freedom', the Sierra
Leone Company was founded in I 790.36 Taking over Sharpe's concession, its
object was 'the Introduction of Civilization into Africa'.37 This the Company
expected to achieve by the establishment of a trading settlement handling
tropical produce; this would build up links with neighbouring tribes and serve
as an example to them by its own industry, peace and prosperity. Persuasion
by rational example would contribute to the abolition of the slave trade, the
root cause of Africa's barbarity.
Civilization with the assistance of 'legitimate' trade, however, did not
involve the intimate linking of commerce and Christianity which the
Company's association with the Clapham Sect might lead one to expect.
Others have noted how 'the Sierra Leone Company began with hardly any
thought about the possible uses of either education or missionary work'.38 In
the early days of the venture there were perhaps good reasons for this. It was
mounted hastily, in part to rescue the earlier scheme, and Nova Scotian blacks,
supposedly already educated Christians, were brought in. The missionary
movement itself was only just beginning. The accent on legitimate trade may
have owed more than anything to domestic political necessity: Wilberforce
and his friends found in that idea something with which to counter the
pro-slavery lobby's arguments that slavery was ineradicably rooted in African
conditions, and abolition would seriously damage Britain's interests.39 How-
ever, one has to explain not just the start of the company, but the persistence
of this predominant concern with the secular aspects of civilization through-
out the company's life.
35 As examples of this commonly held view, Wilberforce, Life, iv, III, William Wilberforce to
Lord Wellesley, 6 April I8I3; and Henry Martyn, Sermons (Calcutta, I822), no. xx, on the British
and Foreign Bible Society.
36 P. D. Curtin, The image of Africa: British ideas and action, I780-i850 (London, I965), chs. 4-5;
Christopher Fyfe, A history of Sierra Leone (Oxford, I962), p. 94; J. Peterson, Province offreedom:
a history of Sierra Leone, I787-i870 (London, I969), ch. I.
37 P.P. I8o I-2, II (339), Report from the coin,nittee on the petition of the court of directors of the Sierra
Leone Company, p. 7.
38 Curtin,; Image of Africa, p. 262.
39 Ibid., and pp. I05-7; R. A. Austen and W. D. Smith, 'Images of Africa and British slave
trade abolition: the transition to an imperialist ideology', African Historical Stuzdies, II (I969).
40 Parliamentary Register, XVIII, 683-7, I I June I802; P.P. I80I-2, II (339), 22.
41 Cobbett's Parliamentary Debates, ix, I 04, 29 July I 807.
42 Ibid. I003-5-
43 Parliamentary Register, xviii, 686-7, I I June I802, Henry Thornton.
44 P.P. I80I-2, II (339), 30-I, evidence of William Greaves.
IV
45 J. A. James, Missionary prospects: a sermon the substance of which was delivered in Hoxton
Chapel.. .826, at the opening of Hoxton College as a missionary academy (Birmingham, I 826), p. 24.
One implication of the argument so far is that as changes took place in the
mission field, as evangelical experience of missionary problems grew, and as
socio-economic circumstances altered at home, so the evangelical formulation
of the link between civilization and Christianity, Christianity and commerce,
would also change. Certainly this seems to have happened, for despite the
persistent framework of evangelical theology, shifts in thinking are clearly
discernible in the I82os. Although at first these were often unsystematic,
thinking crystallized rapidly in the following decade, and on two particular
occasions in the I830s missionary leaders were not only provided with the
opportunity but were self-confident enough to spell out their views at length.
In outline, missionary attitudes to India changed least of all. Notwithstanding
the expansion of British commerce after i8I 3 and the further expectations of
growth when the East India Company's monopoly of the China trade was
ended in I833, the educational strategy remained fashionable. Commercial
activity seemed to bear no relation to successful conversion, and the total
numbers of converts remained very small. It therefore seemed more rational
to alter the content of the education missionaries provided. The curriculum
was progressively broadened to link Christianity more closely with western
learning; under the influence of Alexander Duff, the emphasis on higher
education was increased in the hope of converting Brahmins, so producing
able native agents with the intention of undermining Indian religions from
the top.
Elsewhere, different conditions prompted alternative approaches. In both
the British West Indies and Cape Colony, missionaries became steadily more
aware of the extent to which the development of colonial rule had promoted
conditions of subordination for large numbers of non-Europeans which were
incompatible with a truly Christian existence. Not only were the activities of
missionaries themselves severely restricted by colonial officials, white settler
farmers, and planter-dominated assemblies. Conditions of life for slaves or for
the notionally free but hardly less restricted Khoikhoi labourers of the Cape
were such as to deprive them of both opportunities to hear the Gospel and
the freedom or liberty of choice essential to practical Christian morality. Under
47 For criticisms of a 'wandering' existence as inimical to Christianity, The jozurnials of the Rev.
T. L. Hodgson, missionary to the Seleka-Rolong and the Griqzuas, i82i-3i, ed. R. L. Cope gJohannesburg,
I977), pp. 66, 76; notes by DrJohn Philip, ? i840, Philip papers, Rhodes House Library, Oxford,
MSS Afr. s. 2I9C, fo. 59I ;James Read (L.M.S. missionary) to SirJohn Cradock (governor, Cape
of Good Hope), 23 Jan. i8I2, Council for World Mission Archive, School of Oriental and African
Studies, London (hereafter L.M.S.) 5/i/B/I 2.
48 The Kitchingman papers: missionary letters andjozurnals, 1817 to i848, fromn the Brenthiurst collection,
johannesburg, ed. Basil Le Cordeur and Christopher Saunders Johainnesburg, I976), pp. I29-34,
I38-45, I56-9.
49 Niel Gunson, Messengers of grace: evangelical miiissionaries in the Sozuth Seas, I797-i860 (Melbouirin
I978), pp. I I5-2 I, I36; John Williams, A narrative of missionary enterprises in the Sozuth Sea Islan
(London, I837).
the expense of the Mission and the support of the Missionaries', thus freeing
metropolitan resources for employment elsewhere.50 Before long the London
directors were asking the explicit question 'how far is it right to spend money
on stations which cannot be made productive' ?51
As evidence of the cumulative effect of these piecemeal changes occurring
over some twenty-five years, the arguments developed by evangelicals in
testimony to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Aborigines in 1836-7
are of particular significance. This committee was set up to 'consider what
Measures ought be adopted with regard to the NATIVE INHABITANTS
of Countries where BRITISH SETTLEMENTS are made, and to the
neighbouring Tribes, in order to secure to them the due observance ofJustice
and the protection of their Rights; to promote the spread of Civilization among
them, and to lead them to the peaceful and voluntary reception of the Christian
Religion'.52 Among those giving evidence were the secretaries of the three
principal missionary societies, the C.M.S., the Wesleyan Methodist Missionary
Society, and the L.M.S., who drew on their acquaintance with a wide range
of British settler communities and non-European societies in South Africa, New
Zealand, North America, and the South Seas.53
Whatever reservations had existed about European activity overseas at the
end of the eighteenth century had been multiplied and confirmed. Coates,
Beecham, and Ellis for the missionary societies were unanimous that 'the effect
of European intercourse has been, upon the whole, a calamity on the heathen
and savage nations', tending 'to prevent the spread of civilization, education,
commerce and Christianity'.54 In these circumstances, it is scarcely surprising
that the eighteenth-century question, as to introducing first either Christianity
or civilization, they answered unequivocally by asserting that Christianity
both could and should pave the way.55
Although these statements can be seen as more authoritative confirmations
of older views, further evidence to the committee focused on the question of
how conflict was to be minimised, and shows missionary arguments beginning
to take a turn which points clearly in the direction of Livingstone's and
Wilberforce's views of i86o. Here the influence of South African and New
Zealand examples was very strong, and it emerged that appropriation of native
lands and attempts to control their labour were the greatest source of
grievance.56 Protection of native possessions and working conditions were felt
21 HIS 28
(London, I 92 7), chs. I 0- I 3; idem, Bantu, Boer, and Briton: the makting of the South African native probl
(Oxford, I963, rev. edn), pp. I87-90.
57 P.P. I836, vii (538), qq. 4350, 4375, and passim.
58 J. Philip, Researches in South Africa (2 vols., London, I828), especially I, ch. x, and II, 355-6I;
Macmillan, Cape coloured question. For evidence of Philip's ow~n change of views under the impact
of experience in the field, compare Rev. John Philip, Necessity of divine influence: a sermon preached
before the Missionary Society...May I2, 1813 (London, I8I3), with views of I820-2, Philip papers,
MSS Afr. S.2I6, fos. 9I, I43.
59 P.P. I837, VII (425), Report.
60 P.P. I836, vii (538), qq- 4345-7-
61 Ibid q. 4367.
62 Kitchingman papers, p. 272; Philip to Miss Buxton, 15 March I832, Philip papers, MSS Afr.
S.2i9B, fo. 328.
63 P.P. I836, vii (538), q- 4383-
64 Ibid. qq. 446, 4397.
65 Ibid. qq- 44I2, 4376, 4385-
becoming clearer that Christianity too required the right cultural underpinning.
After the guarantee of peace, 'It is also necessary... to their moral and religious
improvement, to encourage industry and commerce.' Here again was an
opening for the British government to act as an essential complement to the
missionary societies: it should send out 'individuals to promote agriculture
and manufactures among uncivilized tribes on the borders of our colonies'.
That done, it 'would not be perhaps too much for a government standing in
the position which the British Government does, to afford to people in such
circumstances every facility and encouragement in commerce which the
remission of... duties would afford'.66 Freer trade would thus assist 'moral and
religious' transformation. The introduction of Christianity and 'social
improvement' was itself referred to not only in an older language which still
spoke of compassion or benevolence and atonement for wrong, but also now
as 'a fair remuneration for the loss of their lands', in other words in the
language of contract and exchange.67
The proceedings of the Aborigines Committee suggest that for evangelicals
experience had confirmed the promotion of a system of trading relations as
the only way of organizing mutually beneficial contact between settlers and
natives. Trade could be expected to follow right on the heels of Christianity
anid in such circumstances could be seen as a necessary support. Outside the
Committee Room, missionary society policy was being developed to give effect
to this conviction. Responding at last to suggestions from their missionaries
in the Pacific, the L.M.S. and the Wesleyans were sanctioning the extension
of those local developments which tied the expansion of Christianity more
closely to trade.68 In areas outside the Aborigines Committee's brief,
experience also prompted the same equation of commerce and Christianity.
The extent of the slave trade in West Africa was continuing to alarm
humanitarians. Sierra Leone had failed to set the hoped-for example. Britain's
slave trade squadron on the coast, diplomatic negotiations with European
powers, treaties with local African rulers, had all made little impact; as a result,
it was said, Christianity 'had made but feeble inroads'. On the other hand,
'were this obstacle removed' by a successful promotion of legitimate trade,
'Africa would present the finest field for the labours of Christian missionaries
which the world has yet seen'. 69
The writer of these words was T. F. Buxton, leading humanitarian,
chairman of the Aborigines Committee, and chief spokesman for the
anti-slavery movement. In the literature touching his career, Buxton's
preoccupation with that Committee through at least two parliamentary
sessions (I836-7) has been seen as little more than a diversion from the
66 Ibid. q. 4375.
67 Ibid. q. 4367. In later years, commercial language and analogies were still more consciously
developed by commentators: Rev. James Johnston (ed.), Repost of the centenary conference on the
protestant missions of the world (2 vols., London,i888), pp. I I I-I2.
66 Gunson, pp. I I5-I9, I 32-6, and ch. I4, 'The gospel of civilization'.
69 T. F. Buxton, The African slave trade (London, i83q, 2nd edn), pp. xi-xii.
21-2
70 J. Gallagher, 'Fowell Buxton and the new African policy, I838-42', Cambridge Historical
Journal, x (I 950), 40; Curtin, p. 299; Macmillan, Bantu, Boer, and Briton, pp. 186-7; P. M. Pugh,
Calendar of the papers of Sir T. F. Buxton, I786-i845: List and Index Society: special series, Vol. I3
(London, I979).
71 C. Buxton (ed.), Memoirs of Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton, Bart. (London, I 882), pp. I 84-5.
72 Curtin, p. 300.
73 T. F. Buxton, The remedy (London, I840), quoted in Gallagher, p. 43.
74 T. F. Buxton, The African slave trade and its remedy (London, I840, 2nd edn), ch. 6 'The eleva-
tion of native minds', pp. 502 ff. 75 Gallagher, p. 49.
76 P.P. I842, XI (55i), Report from the select committee on the West Coast of Africa,
647 I-539, 7688-725-
on the fringes of British activity overseas were also confirmed in other ways.
In the very difficult years of I83 7-42, conditions for large numbers in Britain's
industrial cities were extremely harsh; the recovery and expansion of the
country's foreign trade seemed to offer most hope of reviving industry and
development. Evangelicals commonly applied themselves and the same
formulae to domestic as to foreign missions, and Buxton's writings suggest that
he was no exception in this. Not only might 'a legitimate commerce with
Africa. ...be.. the attendant, of civilization, peace, and Christianity' for blacks:
it held out help to handloom weavers as well. 'Any extension...of the trade
to Africa.. will [also] cause a corresponding increase in the demand for the
labour of a class of individuals who have lately been truly represented as
suffering greater privations than any other set of workmen connected with
the cotton trade.'77 Civilization, Christianity, and commerce were on the verge
of becoming identified in the evangelical mind not only abroad but at home.
One further alteration was required to make possible the identification of
commerce and Christianity in the manner understood by Samuel Wilberforce,
Livingstone, or a mid-century missionary strategist like the C.M.S. Secretary,
Henry Venn. For the evangelicals of the late I83os and early i840s, the state
still had an important part to play in supporting true religion, by upholding
the conditions of peace and legality within which missionaries could operate
and legitimate trade thrive. Twenty-five years later, there was not only a much
firmer conviction that trade and Christianity would reinforce each other; more
significant was the expectation that evangelists and traders could proceed
together and be kept in harness without the intervention of government.
Providential theology surely had scant relevance to this change, even if it
was capable of encompassing it. On the one hand, the change can be attributed
to a silent acknowledgement by evangelicals of afait accompli. Especially after
the failure of the Niger Expedition, no home government was prepared to back
the expansion of missionary enterprise in association with legitimate trade in
tropical Africa. After the widespread expansion of influence or territorial
control in the I840s, there followed numerous imperial moves to abandon
awkward or costly responsibilities. Evangelical protests were inadequate to
halt the process by which local powers of self-government were extended in
white settler colonies, and the warnings of the I837 Committee were largely
ignored. The change was only strengthened by the steady abolition of
restraints on trade and government refusal to make protective concessions,
notably in the case of the West Indies, which might have upheld particular
evangelical enterprises. The tendency too of governments towards neutrality
in religious questions at home inevitably depressed evangelical expectations.
If government was proving itself a broken reed, then evangelicals had to
look elsewhere. They did so with growing optimism because, again, experience
rather than theology prompted them to do so. Numbers of native converts
were growing significantly by I850. Buxton had anticipated this possibility
in I839; a decade later, Henry Venn in his jubilee address to the C.M.S.
77 T. F. Buxton, The African slave trade (London,i839, 2nd edn), pp. I95, 233.
VI
7 Ibid. pp. xi-xii; W. Knight, Memoir of the Rev. H. Venn: the missionary secretariat of Henry Venn,
B.D. (London, i88o), p. 277.
79 J. B. Webster, 'The Bible and the plough', Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria, II(I963),
4 I 8-34; J. F. A. Aj ayi, 'Henry Venn and the policy of development', ibid. i (I 959), 33 I -42; idem,
Christian missions in Nigeria, 1841-1891 (London, 1965), chs. 3-6.
0 I. Schapera (ed.), Livingstone's missionary correspondence, i84i-1856 (London, I96I), p. 30I, I2
October I855.
81 Ibid. p. I 85, I 7 October I 85 I. 82 Stanley, p. 93.
83 Stanley also points out that Christianity and commerce were not linked in the context of South
America, ibid. p. 94.
84 R. N. Cust, Notes on missionary subjects (London, I 889), p. I I 8.
85 Ibid. pp. II 2, 42. 86 Cambridge lectuires, p. 24.
P' p. A. Cohen, China and Christianity: the missionary movement and the growth of Chinese anti-foreignism,
i860-i870 (Cambridge, Mass. I963); idem, 'Christian missions and their impact to I900', Th
Cambridge history of China, X. Late Ch'ing, i800o-9ii, ed. J. K. Fairbank and D. Twitche
(Cambridge, I976), pp. 543-90.
92 Miissionary correspondence, p. 301.
93 E. Maples, Chauncy Maples (London, I897), p. 350, 3I August 1893, and p. 354; H. M. Smith,
Frank Bishop of Zanzibar: life of Frank Weston, D.D., i87I-I924 (London, I926), pp. 24, 4I, 96-7,
242.
VII
95 A. Lorimer, Colour, class and the Victorians: English attitudes to the negro in the mid-nineteenth ce
(Leicester U.P., I978).
96 S. Piggin, 'The social background, motivation, and training of British protestant missionarie
to India, I789-I858' (London, Ph.D. thesis, I974), ch. I.
97 C. P. Williams, "'Not quite gentlemen": an examination of "middling class" protestant
missionaries from Britain, c. I850-I900', Jfournal of Ecclesiastical History, xxxi (I980), 30I-I5.
98 Rev. J. B. Marsden, Memoirs of the life and letters of the Rev. Samuel Marsden (London, I858);
The letters and journals of Samuel Marsden, I765-i838, ed. J. R. Elder (Dunedin, I932);
H. W. Macmillan, 'The origins and development of the African Lakes Companly, I878-I908'
(Edinburgh, Ph.D. thesis, I970); J. McCracken, Politics and Christianity in Malawi, i875-I94
(Cambridge, I977).