Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ug Bul 00 0100 100009 - 00 - Afu - 2016 12 12 - 01
Ug Bul 00 0100 100009 - 00 - Afu - 2016 12 12 - 01
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................... 3
3 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 4
10 DRAWINGS ........................................................................................................................... 12
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 3 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
1 SCOPE
This document defines the COMPANY optimum requirements to be applied in the execution and reporting of the
structural design and fabrication of steel onshore structures.
This document is applicable for substructures, their foundations, modules, superstructures, buildings and
appurtenances as well as to the structural design of equipment packages.
Weight control and reporting procedure shall be covered by a procedure to be submitted by ENGINEER, at
early stage of FEED.
Design of onshore steel structures is covered by a dedicated Optimum Requirements - UG-BUL-00-0100-
100010
Materials to be used are covered by a dedicated Optimum Requirements - UG-BUL-00-0100-100011
Fabrication is covered by a dedicated Optimum Requirements - UG-BUL-00-0100-100012
Fire protection is covered by the Safety Optimum Requirements UG-BUL-00-0100-100024
2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
The reference documents listed below form an integral part of the present document.
The structural design of onshore structures shall be conducted in accordance with the reference documents
including codes and standards defined in documents listed hereafter.
External Documents
The applicable version of these documents, including relevant appendices and supplements, is the latest revision
published at the Effective Date of the CONTRACT.
Reference Title
EN 1990 Eurocode: Basis of structural design
EN 1991 (All Parts) Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – All Parts
EN 1993 (All Parts) Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – All Parts
The COMPANY recognizes Eurocodes as a source of sound recommendations on good practice. However, there
exists within these International Standards the requirement for the owner or operator to define certain parameters
which may override suggested default values. These values shall be defined in Project General and Particular
Specifications.
In this context, the default values of parameters recommended by these International Standards shall apply, unless
more onerous values are stipulated within the Contract documents.
Any other proposal based on the content of these International Standards shall be subject to COMPANY approval.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 4 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
3 DEFINITIONS
Throughout this document, the following definitions shall apply:
Purchaser Means the Company or Supplier (as applicable) which have placed the Purchase Order
to the Manufacturer.
Inspector Means COMPANY’s representative(s) or member(s) from an Inspection Agency duly
appointed by COMPANY or Supplier (as applicable) to act as its representative(s) for the
purpose of the Contract.
Third Party Means the Company in charge of independent design appraisal or independent analysis
or independent inspection in accordance with the rules defined in the contractual
reference documents. Third Party can be an independent Company, the Certifying
Authority, the MWS, or the Classification Authority, as defined in the contractual
reference documents.
Certifying authority Means the Company in charge of the certification of the installation (or part thereof) and
of issuing of the relevant certificates in accordance with the rules defined in the
contractual reference documents.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 5 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 6 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 7 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 8 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
Quality management audit reports relating to all structural engineering activity by ENGINEER and
Subcontractors.
Structural material take-off for purchase of steel and other structural components providing itemised lists by
drawing, and overall consolidation by grade, thickness, etc.
Detailed weight reports, regularly updated (typically at one month intervals) over the full duration of the Work.
Mechanical handling and loading diagrams consistently with handling philosophy.
Concept sketches, drawings, load data, calculation notes, etc as required to develop all interfaces, and to
record status of interface agreements, and to confirm compatibility.
Installation drawings and diagrams, including layout drawings.
Drawings and reports to define the requirements for in-service integrity management including the
engineering component of the Design-Fabrication-Installation Résumé, and particular maintenance
procedures for critical components such as structural bearings.
Computer model native files with supporting narrative for all primary structure analysis base on the structure
as defined at the conclusion of the Work.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 9 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
8 COMPUTER MODELS
Structural computer models shall represent accurately the structure geometry, the loads (magnitude, location,
sequence, etc.), the masses, the materials, the dynamic and/or hydrodynamic behaviour and characteristics,
imperfections, and the boundary conditions of the structure that is be analysed, with regard to the type of analysis
to be performed. Any simplification, equivalence, sub-modelling or sub-structures, load cases resulting from sub-
assemblies designed by others, shall be documented in detail and shown to be acceptable for the type of analysis
to be performed in terms of loads, mass, stiffness, displacements, boundary conditions, etc.
In developing computer models, the boundaries shall be represented as accurately as possible. Generally, the
extent of models shall be sufficient to place boundaries of models and points of load application beyond points of
particular design interest, such as points of high stress. Element types must be justified as appropriate to the type
of analysis that is being performed, and particular attention is to be given to the modelling of structural connections
to accurately reflect local load paths and stiffnesses. Joint-offsets must be used with care to ensure accurate
representation of behaviour, and complete code checking of all load paths.
The final version native input files representing the completed design/construction shall be supplied for all global
structure computer analyses. These shall be supplied as “documents” numbered in accordance with the project-
specific procedures. Narrative files shall provide the historical and administrative information to relate the files to
specific analysis reports, and to allow the analyses to be re-run. This narrative shall be accompanied by the input
electronic text file(s) of the complete computer model used for the analysis, including all output and code checks
commands, and the native files which supply the analysis results in order to be able to extract individual element
forces and joint displacements, etc. Each calculation note shall clearly make cross-reference to the numbered
computer files, and the electronic copy of the computer structural models shall be issued to COMPANY at the same
time.
COMPANY shall be supplied with the as-built implementation of the 3D plant model, together with associated data-
base files which define component modelling in respect to computation of weight.
All structural analysis reporting shall supply element datasheets, and background reference in the form of
appendices to enable full understanding by COMPANY of the content of analysis, input listings and output data.
ENGINEER shall retain full responsibility for all engineering analysis undertaken with software supplied from any
source. ENGINEER is expected to maintain and use up-to-date versions of analysis software, and to follow all
advice from the software suppliers to achieve valid output.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 10 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
inches shall be avoided even for tubular sizes. All documents/calculation notes shall be issued to COMPANY
preferably as text-searchable “Pdf” files extracted from native files (scanned computer output is prohibited) with a
minimum definition of 300 dpi, and transmitted electronically. Watermarks are prohibited in all engineering
documents. Any document submitted which contains parts of insufficient resolution, or with missing sections, or
disordered pages, etc will be rejected, and shall be resubmitted for review.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 11 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
For any type of structural calculation or analysis performed on computer, the computer outputs shall restore
exactly and in detail the input data, along with the analysis results. The inputs shall be annotated with
explanatory notes to enable the reader to find easily all applicable instructions and to correlate any modelled
feature against its intended behaviour.
Loading sketches or drawings showing the distribution, orientation and magnitude of input loadings, load-
case by load-case. Loading cases modelling equipment loads shall be fully traceable to individual equipment
tag numbers plot plans. Concentrations of piping or other service loads shall be accurately represented. The
load case combinations shall be given in the form of a table showing the different options and the coefficients
used.
Other data specific to the purpose of the analysis, such as stress concentration factors and S-N
classifications in a fatigue analysis; distribution of masses and modelling of damping in dynamic analysis;
material stress-strain modelling and joint stiffness characteristics in non-linear analysis; imperfection input to
buckling analysis; etc.
The results sections shall summarize:
Resultant loading totals and centroids by individual load case and combination.
Reactions on boundary supports for each elementary and combined case.
Plots to summarize the overall deflection under dominant loadings with numerical deflection data at key
points as needed to document the distribution of vertical and lateral deflections. Joint displacements shall be
printed for dead load and combined cases.
The dominant behaviour natural frequencies, mode shapes and participation mass in analyses of frame
structures such as bridges, masts and towers, helidecks, and other subassemblies where mass, stiffness or
loading characteristics suggest dynamic susceptibility.
For frame structures, member and joint code-check results shall be given in detail for every member (as a
minimum at both ends and mid section) or node grouped by sub-assembly (horizontal levels, frame braces,
etc.) and shall include effective stresses, allowable stresses, summarised checking parameters,
node/member geometrical characteristics and critical load case identification. The code checking results
outputs shall also indicate the reference of the code formula for each utilisation factor printed. Computer
plots shall present the utilisation factors for members and nodes where the utilization exceeds 0.5 together
with the member/node identifiers.
Additional listings of member forces shall be supplied in support of separate computation or calculation of
stresses in connections.
Presentation of results from finite element analysis of shell and solid models shall demonstrate that the mesh
used is sufficiently refined to represent stress gradients accurately. Stress plots shall clearly indicate the type
of stress that has been computed, and the structural surface on which they apply. Assessment of finite
element results shall demonstrate compliance of stress states with the governing design standard, in respect
to yielding and buckling limit states. Strength assessment of local peaks in stress shall be based on
procedures submitted in advance and Approved by COMPANY. Limits on equivalent stresses established
from bi-axial and tri-axial stress states shall be set at the same level as defined in the reference standards for
simple uni-axial stress states. Analyses to establish buckling behaviour shall document code compliance in
respect to allowance for residual stress and imperfection, interaction between local and global buckling
behaviour, and use of reduced slenderness to establish characteristic strengths.
Presentation of results from non-linear analysis should include graphical data to confirm accurate
assimilation of intended input, such as overall loading history, boundary reactions, and absorbed energy.
Global deformation history and distribution of peak stresses and strains must be presented graphically by
load case. It shall be demonstrated that modelling, and subsequent assessment, correctly captures all
possible failure modes including local buckling and rupture at connections.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 12 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
Design calculations shall be supplied to document the integrity of all load-bearing structure connections. These
calculations shall include sketches to show assumed load paths through the component and into the supporting
structure. Where spread-sheet calculations are used, these shall be clearly annotated to explain and give
references to the formulae used, and the sections to which they apply. Results for groups of similar components
should be summarized in table form which indicates computer model joint and member data, governing loads, and
relevant structural drawings.
All instances of refined design or fabrication methods used to justify particular locations or components, which
otherwise do not pass the acceptance standards using the general methodology shall be highlighted in the Design,
Fabrication and Installation Résumé.
Reports of structural analysis shall always supply a summary of the designer’s validation of the work. This may be
included as an appendix. Typically, this may take the form of a checklist to document independent assessment of
the work in accordance with the ENGINEER’s quality procedures. It is expected that the validation will confirm
completeness and its adherence to the design basis. Generally, some pre-analysis manual checks shall have been
performed to confirm correct global response. Complex analysis procedures shall be benchmarked to confirm that
the modelling approach will achieve a known solution. The extent of checking may depend upon the criticality of the
component to the load-bearing integrity of the structural system according to the quality procedures.
10 DRAWINGS
All drawings shall be issued to scale in readable A3 format. The following drawings shall be provided as part of the
Approved For Construction Engineering drawings set:
Drawing list, including material take off and structural weight for each drawing of the list. This drawing list
shall be updated at each new drawing revision issue
Structural general arrangement drawing (3D perspective) of the complete structure
General note drawing
Typical welding and bolting connections detail drawings and other standard details.
At the end of the Construction, the Engineering drawings shall be issued As Built, to include drawings of the
complete structure including all attachments. Therefore at all times they shall be kept up to date and shall be the
master reference on which Shop Drawings and/or fabrication drawings are based. Fabrication shall finally be in
compliance with those reference Approved For Construction Engineering Design Drawings. Each as-built drawing
shall include references to all construction query documentation that affects it. The as-built documentation shall
provide for full traceability of materials and weld mapping.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.
Document Number:
Onshore Steel Structures & equipment packages General UG-BUL-00-0100-100009
Revision : 00 Status : AFU
Optimum Requirements
Rev. Date : 12-Dec-2016
Class: NA Page 13 of 13
Doc. Type : SPE Discipline : STR Phase: FE
System / Subsystem : NN Equipment Type :NA
Typical general notes drawing shall, in particular, fully define all material grades used, and provide references to
the international standards used to define weld symbols, tolerances, machine finishes and other drawing standards.
A designer’s in-house standards on the meaning of particular weld symbols, abbreviations and other terminology
shall be clearly explained.
Standard detail drawings shall be logically arranged in sets, and each type of detail uniquely numbered.
References to the standard details shall ensure no ambiguity in respect to the designer’s requirements on
applicability of particular details and weld configuration.
This document is the property of TOTAL E&P UGANDA (TEPU) and shall not be disclosed to third parties or reproduced
without permission of the owner.