Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composite MAT CH2-Part4
Composite MAT CH2-Part4
Composite MAT CH2-Part4
• Stress, Strain
• Stress–strain relationships for different types of materials
• Stress–strain relationships for a unidirectional/bidirectional lamina
Hilal_reda@hotmail.com
-This theory is based on the distortion energy failure theory of Von-Mises’ distortional
energy yield criterion for isotropic materials as applied to anisotropic materials.
-It is assumed that failure in the material takes place only when the distortion energy is
greater than the failure distortion energy of the material.
“Hill” adopted the Von-Mises’ distortional energy yield criterion to anisotropic materials.
“Tsai” adopted it to a unidirectional lamina. Based on the distortion energy theory, he
proposed that a lamina has failed if below inequality is violated:
The components G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, and G6 of the strength criterion depend on the
failure strengths and are found as follows:
1. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
reduces to
2. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
reduces to
4. Apply to a unidirectional lamina; then, the lamina will fail. Thus, Equation
reduces to
The components G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, and G6 of the strength criterion depend on the
failure strengths and are found as follows:
Solution:
From previous example (The transformation from global to local coordinates) :
For Example, the modified Tsai–Hill failure theory given by 10.94 now gives:
3. The Tsai–Hill failure theory is a unified theory and thus does not give the
mode of failure like the maximum stress and maximum strain failure theories
do. However, one can make a reasonable guess of the failure mode by
calculating and . The maximum of these three
values gives the associated mode of failure.
In the modified Tsai–Hill failure theory, calculate the maximum of |σ1/X1|,
|σ2/Y|, and |τ12/S| for the associated mode of failure.
- This failure theory is more general than the Tsai–Hill failure theory because
it distinguishes between the compressive and tensile strengths of a lamina.
The components H1, H2, H6, H11, H22, and H66 of the failure theory are
found using the five strength parameters of a unidirectional lamina as
follows:
Solution:
From privious example :
• Tsai compared the results from various failure theories to some experimental results
•The failure stresses were obtained experimentally for tensile and compressive stresses for
various angles of the lamina.
• The experimental results can be compared with the four failure theories by finding
the stresses in the material axes for an arbitrary stress, σx, for an angle lamina with
an angle, θ, between the fiber and loading direction as
• Using the preceding local strains and stresses in the four failure theories
•The difference between the maximum stress and maximum strain failure theories and the
experimental results is quite pronounced.
• Tsai–Hill and Tsai–Wu failure theories’ results are in good agreement with experimentally
obtained results.
• The variation of the strength of the angle lamina as a function of angle is smooth in the Tsai–
Hill and Tsai–Wu failure theories, but has cusps in the maximum stress and maximum strain
failure theories.
Problem
1. Consider an 3D orthotropic material with the following stiffness matrix :
Find:
a.The stresses in the principal directions of symmetry (local coordinates) if
the strains in the principal directions of symmetry at a point in the material
are ε1 = 1 μm/m, ε2 = 3 μm/m, ε3 = 2 μm/m; γ23 = 0, γ31 = 5 μm/m,
γ12 = 6 μm/m
b. The compliance matrix [S]
c. The engineering constants E1, E2, E3, ν12, ν23, ν31, G12, G23, G31