Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Can - ChatGpt - Replace - Humans - Technical - Paper's Keshav and Sanchit
Can - ChatGpt - Replace - Humans - Technical - Paper's Keshav and Sanchit
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the viability of constraints that prevent it from totally replacing
people in a variety of roles in this investigation.
ChatGPT as a replacement for human
interaction. Through empirical analysis, the We will look at the benefits and difficulties of
paper assesses ChatGPT's performance in this quickly developing area, offering insight
comparison to human communication, on the changing interaction between AI
considering empathy, context comprehension, and human talents.
and nuanced dialogue. Ethical implications, While ChatGPT and comparable AI models
including privacy and bias concerns, are have made impressive strides in mimicking
explored. Findings reveal ChatGPT's strengths human-like conversation and problem-solving,
and underscore the irreplaceable aspects of it becomes clear as we navigate this complex
human interaction. The paper advocates for a topic that the idea of complete replacement
balanced integration where ChatGPT remains a matter of ongoing debate and
enhances, rather than replaces, human exploration, shaped by ever-evolving
technology, societal values, and our
communication.
understanding of human uniqueness.
• User Interaction: Users interact with 4. IBM Watson Assistant: IBM Watson
ChatGPT by providing text-based input Assistant is a chatbot and virtual assistant
through a chat interface, as you are doing platform that allows businesses to build
now. The model processes the input and AI-powered conversational agents for
generates text-based responses. customer support and other use cases.
X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT [6].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P
MC10028016/
The question of whether ChatGPT and other AI
systems can take the place of humans is complex
and involves numerous technological, moral, and [7]. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
sociological issues. The primary goal of AI,
including ChatGPT, is to augment human talents
by automating processes, disseminating
knowledge, and increasing output. The intrinsic
limitations of AI, which lack real consciousness,
emotions, and profound understanding, must be
understood, though. It is still difficult for AI to
imitate human traits like empathy, creativity,
moral judgement, and critical thinking.
Additionally, it is important to carefully address
the ethical implications of replacing humans with
AI, including worries about job displacement,
privacy, accountability, and bias. The most
effective strategy frequently entails a partnership
between people and AI, with humans providing
the crucial context and oversight that AI
systems could lack. It's also critical to recognise
that AI should augment rather than completely
replace human functions in society. Intelligent
judgement and ethical consideration are required
in the dynamic and ever-evolving conversation
regarding AI's potential to replace humans.
X. REFERENCES
[1].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367
161545_Chatting_about_ChatGPT_How_may_
AI_and_GPT_impact_academia_and_libraries
[2].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstr
act_id=4402499