ADVANCED

STATISTIC
S
BY : Maxine Mae D. Uminga
9 - Pythagoras
 SUBMITTED TO :
Ma'am Amy Facun-Capelo
Study of the Problem

1.) Which among the treatment is the best:

Table 1. Taste
Table 2. Aroma
Table 3. Packaging
Table 4. Appearance
Table 5. Color

2.) Is there a significant difference among the most acceptable treatments of

sweet potato as a substitute for coffee?
Table 1. The mean of Scores in rating the Taste of Sweet Potato Coffee.

T0 T1 T2 T3

X X2 X1 X12 X2 X22 X3 X32

5 25 4 16 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 3 9

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 4 16 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16
∑x=59 ∑x2=291 ∑x1=58 ∑x12=282 ∑x2=49 ∑x3=53 ∑x32=239
2
∑x2 =207
N1 = 12 N2 = 12 N3 = 12 N4= 12

X = 4.92 X1 = 4.83 X2 = 4.08 X3 = 4.42

This table shows that among the mean rating of overall taste, T0 has the

highest mean of 5, followed by T1 , T2 and T3 with a mean of 4. The results indicate

that T0 and T1 are the most accepted in terms of mean rating of overall taste.
ANOVA (ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE). For the overall Taste of the Sweet
Potato Coffee.
F-VALUE
SV DF SS MS TABULAR
COMPUTED 0.05 0.01
Between
Group 3 5.39 1.80 5.45 2.84 4.31
(K-1)
Within
Group
(N-1)- 44 14.42 O.33
(K-1)
Total 47 19.81
(N-1)

Based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) above, there is a significant

difference in terms of overall taste of Sweet Potato since the F-computed value is 5.45
greater than tabular value at 5% and lesser than the 1% level of significance.

DECISION
If the F-computed value is greater than the F-tabular value, the null hypothesis
is rejected.

CONCLUSION
Since the F-computed value of 5.45 is greater than the F-tabular value of 2.84
at 0.05 level of significance with 3 and 44 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
rejected in favor of the research which means that there is a significant difference
among the most acceptable treatments of sweet potato as a substitute for coffee

Table 2. The mean of Scores in rating the Aroma of Sweet Potato Coffee.

T0 T1 T2 T3
 X X2 X1 X12 X2 X22 X3 X32

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

4 16 5 25 4 16 3 9

4 16 4 16 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

4 16 4 16 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25
∑x=57 ∑x2=273 ∑x1=58 ∑x12=282 ∑x2=55 ∑x22=255 ∑x3=56 ∑x32=266

N1 = 12 N2 = 12 N3 = 12 N4= 12

X = 4.75 X1 = 4.83 X2 = 4.58 X3 = 4.67

This table shows that among the mean rating of overall aroma, T1 has the

highest mean of 5, followed by T0 , T1 and T2 with a mean of 4. The results indicate

that T1 and T0 are the most accepted in terms of mean rating of overall aroma.

ANOVA (ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE). For the overall Aroma of the Sweet

Potato Coffee.
F-VALUE
TABULAR
SV DF SS MS COMPUTED 0.05 0.01
Between
Group 3 0.42 0.14 0.54 2.84 4.31
(K-1)
Within
Group 44 11.5 0.26
(N-1)-
(K-1)
Total
(N-1) 47 11.92

Based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) above, there is no significant

difference in terms of overall aroma of Sweet Potato since the F-computed value is
0.54 less than tabular value at 5% and lesser than the 1% level of significance.

DECISION
If the F-computed value is less than the F-tabular value, the null hypothesis is
accepted.

CONCLUSION
Since the F-computed value of 0.54 is less than the F-tabular value of 2.84 at
0.05 level of significance with 3 and 44 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
accepted in favor of the research which means that there is no significant difference
among the most acceptable treatments of sweet potato as a substitute for coffee.
Table 1. The mean of Scores in rating the Packaging of Sweet Potato Coffee.

T0 T1 T2 T3

X X2 X1 X12 X2 X22 X3 X32

5 25 3 9 4 16 4 16

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 4 16 4 16 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 4 16

4 16 5 25 4 16 3 9

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 4 16 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 3 9 4 16
∑x=54 ∑x2=246 ∑x1=56 ∑x12=266 ∑x2=52 ∑x22=232 ∑x3=54 ∑x32=248

N1 = 12 N2 = 12 N3 = 12 N4= 12

X = 4.5 X1 = 4.67 X2 = 4.33 X3 = 4.5

This table shows that among the mean rating of overall taste, T1 has the
highest mean of 5, followed by T0 , T3 and T2 with a mean of 4. The results indicate
that T1, T0 and T3 are the most accepted in terms of mean rating of overall taste.
ANOVA (ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE). For the overall Packaging of the Sweet
Potato Coffee.

F-VALUE
SV DF SS MS TABULAR
COMPUTED 0.05 0.01
Between
Group 3 0.67 0.22 0.56 2.84 31
(K-1)
Within
Group 44 17.33 0.39
(N-1)-
(K-1)
Total
(N-1) 47 18

Based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) above, there is no significant

difference in terms of overall packaging of Sweet Potato since the F-computed value
is 0.56 less than tabular value at 5% and lesser than the 1% level of significance.

DECISION
If the F-computed value is less than the F-tabular value, the null hypothesis is
accepted.

CONCLUSION
Since the F-computed value of 0.56 is less than the F-tabular value of 2.84 at
0.05 level of significance with 3 and 44 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
accepted in favor of the research which means that there is no significant difference
among the most acceptable treatments of sweet potato as a substitute for coffee.
Table 4. The mean of Scores in rating the Appearance of Sweet Potato Coffee.

T0 T1 T2 T3

X X2 X1 X12 X2 X22 X3 X32

5 25 4 16 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 3 9

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 3 9 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 4 16 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16
∑x=59 ∑x2=291 ∑x1=52 ∑x12=228 ∑x2=54 ∑x22=246 ∑x3=54 ∑x32=248

N1 = 12 N2 = 12 N3 = 12 N4 = 12

X = 4.92 X1 = 4.33 X2 = 4.5 X3 = 4.5

This table shows that among the mean rating of overall taste, T0 has the

highest mean of 5, followed by T2 , T3 and T1 with a mean of 4. The results indicate

that T0, T2 and T3 are the most accepted in terms of mean rating of overall taste.
ANOVA (ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE). For the overall Appearance of the Sweet
Potato Coffee.
F-VALUE
SV DF SS MS TABULA
COMPUTED 0.05 0.01
Between
Group 3 1.06 0.35 1.03 2.84 4.31
(K-1)
Within
Group 44 14.92 0.34
(N-1)-
(K-1)
Total
(N-1) 47 195.98

Based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) above, there is no significant

difference in terms of overall appearance of Sweet Potato since the F-computed value
is 1.03 less than tabular value at 5% and lesser than the 1% level of significance.

DECISION
If the F-computed value is less than the F-tabular value, the null hypothesis is
accepted.

CONCLUSION
Since the F-computed value of 1.03 is less than the F-tabular value of 2.84 at
0.05 level of significance with 3 and 44 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
accepted in favor of the research which means that there is ___ significant difference
among the most acceptable treatments of sweet potato as a substitute for coffee.
Table 5. The mean of Scores in rating the Color of Sweet Potato Coffee.
T0 T1 T2 T3

X X2 X1 X12 X2 X22 X3 X32

5 25 4 16 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

4 16 5 25 5 25 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 3 9

5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 5 25 4 16 5 25

5 25 4 16 4 16 4 16

5 25 5 25 4 16 4 16

∑x=59 ∑x2=291 ∑x1=58 ∑x12=282 ∑x2=52 ∑x22=228 ∑x3=54 ∑x32=248

N1 = 12 N2 = 12 N3 = 12 N4 = 12

x = 4.92 x1 = 4.83 x2 =4.33 x4 = 4.5

This table shows that among the mean rating of overall taste, T0 has the highest mean
of 5, followed by T1, T4 and T2 with a mean of 4. The results indicate that T0 and
T1 are the most accepted in terms of mean rating of overall taste.
ANOVA (ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE). For the overall Appearance of the Sweet
Potato Coffee.
F-VALUE
SV Df SS MS TUBULAR
COMPUTE 0.05 0.01
D
Between
Group 3 2.73 0.91 0.63 2.84 4.31
(K-1)
Within
Group 44 12.25 0.28
(N-1)(K-
1)
Total
(N-1) 47 14.98

Based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) above, there is no significant difference

in terms of overall appearance of Sweet Potato since the F-computed value is 0.63
less than tabular value at 5% and lesser than the 1% level of significance.

DECISION
If the F-computed value is less than the F-tabular value, the null hypothesis is
accepted.

CONCLUSION
Since the F-computed value of 0.63 is less than the F-tabular value of 2.84 at 0.05
level of significance with 3 and 44 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is accepted
in favor of the research which means that there is no significant difference among the
most acceptable treatments of sweet potato as a substitute for coffee.