Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gov Paper Final Draft
Gov Paper Final Draft
Gov Paper Final Draft
Student loan debt has become one of the largest forms of consumer borrowing in the
Unites States due to the rising cost of college and a weakening job market. There is
approximately 1.77 trillion dollars in total student loan debt in the US, highlighting the
importance of discussing how to reduce these student loans. Policymakers need to focus on the
student debt issue and provide a solution that can take the pressure off students while also
maintaining a safe place in the economy. With the current rise in student loan debt and college
tuition costs, the United States government should implement policies, such as targeted debt
relief, and promote alternatives to 4-year degrees in order to curb rising student debt.
Background
As part of his Great Society initiative, President Lyndon Johnson signed the Higher
Education Act (HEA) in 1965. The HEA was intended to provide every high school senior with
the opportunity to attend the college or university of their choosing regardless of their income
level. The act sets up the United States federal government as the primary source of financial aid
for students. Over the last several decades since the enactment of the HEA, the amount of money
borrowed by the individual student as well as the number of students following the path to higher
education has increased dramatically, leading to outstanding student debt. Following the
financial crisis of 2007-2009, several financial cuts in state funding for public colleges and
universities have driven up the price of college tuition, making higher education less affordable
As of 2023, the current US student debt total stands at 1.77 trillion US dollars, an
increase of 66 percent over the last decade. Students of low and moderate household incomes as
well as communities of color are disproportionately affected by student loan debt. Rising student
debt poses a risk to the broader economy of the United States, since consumption declines when
individuals and families have outstanding debts to pay. According to the Aspen Institute, 58% of
student loan borrowers attribute a decline in their credit score due to their outstanding student
debt. Household debt in relation to student loans delays homebuying and the ability to take out
auto loans. Bynoe et al.(2017) has found that from the years of 2005-2015, the number of those
from 23-26 years of age who live with their parents has increased by 11.5% . On average, there
is a 7-year delay for young student borrowers from when they want to buy a home to when they
Not only do student loans affect the economy, but they also have an impact on
employment retention. An employee's outstanding debt influences their decision when seeking
out and accepting job offers. They are more likely to look for employers and companies who are
willing to assist with student loans. According to ADP research institute, “Any level of student
debt increases a worker’s intent to leave, but people with the biggest outstanding student loans
are twice as likely to be looking elsewhere compared to those who have no student debt”
(Northup 2023). This negatively impacts companies since they are losing employees due to their
Student loan debt is also disproportionately held by students of color, which grows the
already existing racial wealth gap. These students are more likely to navigate loan payments on
their own, along with experiencing the greater repercussions of graduating with student debt. The
Pavu 3
Aspen Institute finds that, “a quarter of borrowers of color are currently in default, and almost
30% are unsure if they can make their next payment. Almost 40% of black borrowers drop out
with outstanding debt and struggle to pay back the amount” (Aspen 2023) Outstanding student
debt impacts students of color in several aspects of life, such as credit checks for housing and job
applications. It is important to take in several factors, one of which being race, when deciding
Policy Options
As student debt continues to rise, there has become greater debate on how to lower it.
Researchers at Claremont Graduate University have focused on several proposed policies that
could potentially lower the annual student debt. They test the policies themselves and their
effectiveness on lowering the debt. They also analyze the effects the policies would have on the
economy as a whole by predicting what the real GDP, inflation, and unemployment would be
after the policy is implemented. Universal Debt Forgiveness, Income Based Repayment (IBR)
plans, and Targeted Debt Relief (TDR) plans are the main policies that were tested (Akhalagi
2023).
With the Universal Debt Forgiveness plan, student loans would be forgiven on a national
scale. Proponents for universal student loan debt cancellation argue that it could reduce the
financial burdens of many while also stimulating the economy. If debt from student loans is no
longer a factor, a greater number of individuals would in theory be willing to buy houses, cars,
etc, giving the economy a boost. Critics of universal debt forgiveness argue about the overall
fairness of the plan. They fear that the plan would not take into consideration individuals who
Pavu 4
were responsible with their debt versus individuals who engaged in risky financial behavior
(Akhalagi 2023).
The Income Based Repayment plan ties the payment of student loans with an individual's
monthly income and family size. Proponents argue that this plan aims to make loan payments
more manageable by adjusting the payments according to monthly income, which can greatly
benefit low-income students. There is also greater financial flexibility, since periods of time
where individuals earn a lower income reflect the amount of student loans charged that month.
Critics argue that it negatively impacts borrowers financially in the long run, since they may be
paying a greater interest over the repayment period, even if the monthly payment is lower
(Akhalagi 2023).
The Targeted Debt Relief Plan addresses certain groups or categories of individuals for
debt forgiveness/relief, which is different from the universal approach. The types of categories
could vary, for example, individuals could qualify for debt relief through this plan based on their
income level, type of debt, profession, or specific economic circumstances. Proponents of this
plan believe that assistance will be given to borrowers who need it most and there will be greater
fiscal sustainability compared to the universal approach. Critics argue that the plan may not
account for all circumstances due to the administrative complexities that play into assessing each
While taking into account each plan's advantages and drawbacks, the researchers created
a financial model which demonstrates the economic benefit of each plan. The research concludes
that the best method to lower student debt while also stimulating the economy is the targeted
debt relief plan, as there are significant improvements in GDP, lower inflation and
Alternatives to College
The number of students who pursue four-year degrees has steadily increased over the
years, which is one of the factors that contribute to the growing amount of student debt. Preston
Cooper, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, states that “The
scales are tipped against alternatives such as apprenticeships, workforce training, and the pursuit
of industry-recognized credentials” (Cooper 2022). There are many other opportunities for
students to make an income that does not rely on obtaining a 4-year degree, but the government
loans and grants favor the path to college and university. Colleges feel less competitive pressure
to lower their prices due to the few alternatives to the bachelor's degree, and it does not help that
the bachelor's degree is in high demand for more jobs than needed 30 years ago (Cooper 2022).
Conclusion
Overall, student loans are one of the biggest sources of debt currently in the United
States, but there are ways to lower them and stimulate the economy. The Targeted Debt Relief
plan is one way to lower the total debt coming from student loans by choosing specific groups
that are in most need of debt cancellation. Along with this plan, the United States government
could use funding to expand programs which promote other options that are not 4-year degrees,
such as CTE classes in high schools which could prepare interested students for trade schools.
Pavu 6
Works Cited
Aspen. 2023. “Making the Case: Solving the Student Debt Crisis - the Aspen Institute.” The
the-student-debt-crisis/
Akhlaghi, Emelia. "Opportunity Cost of Student Loan Debt Forgiveness: Testing the Impact of
Four Policy Options on United States’ Economy." Order No. 30570894, The Claremont
https://eznvcc.vccs.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/
opportunity-cost-student-loan-debt-forgiveness/docview/2871584518/se-2.
Pavu 7
Bynoe, Anne J., and Maryann J. Fogarty Di Liberto. “An Analysis of the Student Loan Debt
Crisis in the United States: The Causes, the Current Status, and the Future of Indebted
Students.” Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association, January 2017,
57–62. https://search-ebscohost-com.eznvcc.vccs.edu/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=134235247&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Cooper, Preston. "Why College (Still) Costs Too Much." National Review, February 19, 2022.
Quoted in "Policymakers Must Address the Root Causes of Tuition Inflation." Gale
Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2023. Gale In
com.eznvcc.vccs.edu/apps/doc/KYQDSI349127876/OVIC?
u=viva2_nvcc&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=b27ba398.
Northup, Jared. 2023. “Employers and Student Debt - ADP Research Institute.” ADP Research