Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jigl Summary Notes
Jigl Summary Notes
❖ National school
➢ Definition given by roman and ancient juiciest .
➢ Ulplne , ‘art of science of what is equable and good .
➢ Cicero, ‘highest reason implemented in nature’ .
➢ According to romans ‘justice’ is main element of law
➢ According to Hindu , law is part of dharma .
❖ Positivistic Definition
➢ Austin gives theory of commands of sovereign .
➢ According to him ,law is command of sore , baked by sanction (punishment)
➢ Element of law – command ,duty and sanction .
➢ He stated what was law instead what should be .
1
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
❖ Historical
➢ Savigny’s theory of law .
➢ Law was found and not made .
➢ Not universal in nature .
➢ Law has source of common consciousness
➢ Lawyer and jurist more important than legislature ,
❖ Sociological
➢ Theory of Roscoe pound .
❖ Realistic
➢ Law is mechanism to regulate human conduct in society .
➢ Create harmonious co-operation in members .
❖ Significance of Law
➢ Law is not static .
➢ Law helps to maintain socio-economic behaviour .
➢ Ensure social justice .
➢ Hope security foe future .
Legal conventional
Binding of law and
Enforceable by court- known as ‘usage’
geographical personal
2
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
❖ Ratio Decidendi
➢ Means ‘reason for deciding’ .
➢ Only material fact to be followed by by eliminating immaterial elements is know as ratio
decidendi .
➢ It has binding effect like precedent .
❖ Obiter Dicta
➢ Said by the way :-
➢ When judge delivers judgment there are certain statements gives by him are not strictly
necessary for decision of particular issue raised .
➢ Thus ,judge are not bound to follow them.
➢ They can take advantage of them .
➢ It is only persuasive precedents.
❖ Kinds Of Precedents
2. Persuasive Precedents
➢ Judges are not obliged to follow it ,
➢ Only can take into consideration .
3
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
High court
➢ Decision of high court -binding on subordinate .
➢ persuasive to another higher court
➢ Smallest bench – single judge .
➢ Division bench – two judge .
➢ Full bench – three or more .
➢ Decision of Division Bench binding on Smallest Bench of high court .
Supreme court
➢ Highest court , its decision binding on all courts
➢ Supreme court is not bound by its own decision .
Statues or legislature
Supreme L subordinate L
- Derive its power directly from - derive its power from any
Constitution . authority other than
sovereign power
- Not controlled by any one other - depends on superior
authority for
Legislature authority existence .
- E.g. parliament , president - e,g. corporation municipal
Personal Law
4
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
Jurisprudence:-
➢ Jurisprudence means a combination of word ‘juris’ means law and prudence means
knowledge .
➢ Jurisprudence is a study of science of law .
➢ Jurisprudence is study of rules ,duties and obligation .
➢ Primary duty of Jurisprudence is to throw light on nature of law .
➢ There are 2 fold aspect of law ,
Abstract body of rule .
Social machinery of securing order in community .
➢ School of Jurisprudence emphasize on.
Analytical Sociological
Jurisprudence:- Jurisprudence:-
➢ Abstract theory of
law . ➢ law is made to
➢ Tries to discovers solve certain
problems.
element of pure 5
➢ It is better to
science .
➢ This is to make understand problems
Jurisprudence , in order to understand
universally law better .
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
Legal Theory :-
❖ Criticism
➢ Sovereign is not bound to obey some one .
➢ Not consider judge .
➢ Does cover international law .
Criticism
➢ It says that justice is end and law is medium is question by certain laws .
➢ Justice is not the sole purpose of law .
➢ Contradiction in its own theory .
6
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
➢ He is positivist .
➢ He focused on what was law instead of what it should be .
➢ Described law as ‘normative science’ .
➢ Consider sanction as important element but called it norms .
➢ Kelson’s theory is of pyramidal structure of norms which derives its validity from basic
norms
➢ Such norms known as grund norms .
➢ G. norm norms resulted of social ,economic, political and supposed to be valid by itself .
➢ For e.g.Indian law is valid because derived by parliament and president .P and P derives their
authority from basic norms i.e. constitution .
Criticism
➢ Difficult to trace grund norm
➢ Gnorm cease to be pure because derived from social economics , historical factors .
➢ Theory views primary of international law but most of countries given primary to municipal
laws .
4. Jeremy banthem :-
➢ Banthem’s concept said to be imperative .
➢ Nature impose man under to be imperative .- pain and pleasure
➢ Function of law isto bring happiness i.e. pleasure to maximum . will result in happiness of all
➢ According to him . law must consider .
• Source – will of sovereign .
• Subject – may be personal thing .
• Extent – coverage of act .
• Aspect – 4 aspects – command , non command prohibited , and non prohibition
• Remedial rules – addressed to judges.
• Objects – purpose of act .
• Force – to obey the law .
Criticism
➢ Does not take proper account of law .
➢ Didnt give consideration to custom as source of law
➢ Didn’t allow for judge to make laws .
➢ Happiness of one become cost of another’s happiness
SELF NOTES-
7
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157.
8
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
Ordinances,
Constitution Judicial
Acts / Statues Notifications,
of India Decisions
Circulars etc
Administrative Discretion:-
➢ Means freedom of an administrative authority to choose among various alternative.
➢ Such choice with reference to rule of reason and justice and not according to personal
whims.
➢ Exercise of discretion should not be arbitrary vague but legal and regular.
➢ It is nearly impossible for govt to function without giving such discretion to its officials
considering different situation and circumstance.
➢ But since such discretion is prone to be abused therefore it is necessary to have a
system in place to ensure fair exercise of such discretion.
10.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
. Constitution
Judicial review
Judicial Review:-
➢ It is authority of court to declare any act of legislature and executive as void, if they
violate constitutional requirements.
Concerns during Judicial Review
10.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
2. Non-Application Of Mind :-
➢ Acting under dictation: - when authority exercise its power under instrument from
superior authority .it is non- application of mind.
➢ Self-restriction – authority itself restrict its power by declaring some rules and applied
rigidly in all case.
➢ Acting mechanically and without due care – authority acts without care, non-
exercising discretion to look deeper into any matter such action is bad.
4. Ordinary or equitable.
Prohibition mandatory
Temporary perpetual.
Prohibitory Injunction:-
➢ Temporary injunction: - contious for specific time limit up to order of court.
➢ Perpetual injunction: - granted at conclusion after defining rights of parties.
Mandatory injunction: - it is command to do particular act and prohibit defendant from
continuing wrongful act.
Declaratory action: - decree passed against administrative body is known as declamatory
action.
Action of damages: - if any injury occur to any Indian, damage recover from concern
government.
10.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
Natural Justice:-
➢ It is a concept of common law .it is important to raise faith for legal system in eyes of
general public.
➢ Principle of natural justice are implied in article 14 and 21 of constitution of India.
➢ Its scope varies according to context
It includes:-
2. Personal Bias –
When a judge is personally connected or at a friendly term with either of party having
familiar, professional or business relation, judge will disqualified. Biased may be either
against of party or in favour of any party.
2. Right to present case – both the parties have full opportunity to present their case.
This includes presentation of evidence too.
10.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
c) Discloser of evidence – right to disclose all the evidence which have been accumulated
for the case by party in court to support and prove his side.’
d) Speaking order – it is order that explains decision and reason, parties have not only
right to decision but also known the reason behind the decision.
10.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676156
Liability of public servant: - if public servant acted beyond its official power and illegal
then the government will not be vicariously liable for such act of servant in this situation
servant will be personally liable.
Liability of public corporation – corporation made under any special act is public
corporation .it is independent from government and its employee also not considered as
government employee, so government will not be labile for any act done by employee of
public corporation …
SELFNOTES-
10.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Tribunals are the quasi-judicial bodies established to adjudicate disputes related to specified matters
which exercise the jurisdiction according to the Statute establishing them.
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002 introduced the NCLT as a dedicated Tribunal to handle
Constitution of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under section 408 and the National
Company Law Appellate Tribunal under section 410 of Companies Act, 2013 as notified by the Central
Government w.e.f. 1st June, 2016.
9.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
NCLT can approve issue of further redeemable preference shares when 55(3)
a company is unable to redeem its existing unredeemed preference shares
or to pay dividend thereon.
Chapter –VII “Management and Administration”
On the application of a member, the Tribunal may call or direct the 97(1)
calling of an annual general meeting if default is made in holding the
Annual General Meeting.
In case it is impracticable to call a meeting, the Tribunal may either 98(1)
suomoto, or on application of a director or member of the company who
is entitled to vote at the meeting, order to call meeting i.e extra ordinary
general meetings and give such directions as may be necessary.
The Tribunal may direct that inspection of minute book of general 119(4)
meeting be given to a member.
Chapter-X “Audit and Auditors”
To restrict copies of representation of the auditor to be removed to be 140(4)
sent out.
The Tribunal may, on the application of the company or any aggrieved Second proviso of
person, order that copy of representation by the Auditor need not be sent 140(4)(iii)(b)
to members nor read at the meeting.
Where NCLT is satisfied that the Auditor has acted in a fraudulent 140(5)
manner, it mat order that the Auditor may be changed
9.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
The Central Government shall, by notification, constitute, with effect from such date as may be
specified therein, an Appellate Tribunal to be known as the National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal consisting of a Chairperson and such number of Judicial and Technical Members, not
exceeding 11.
BENCHES OF TRIBUNAL
(1) Constituted such number of Benches of the Tribunal, as may, by notification, be specified by the
Central Government.
(2) Principal Bench of the Tribunal shall be at New Delhi which shall be presided over by the President
of the Tribunal.
➢ The powers of the Tribunal shall be exercisable by Benches consisting of two Members out of
whom one shall be a Judicial Member and the other shall be a Technical Member.
➢ If at any stage of the hearing the members feel that they are unable to resolve the matter then they
may refer the case to President.
ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL
Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal has
been preferred under this Act.
(3) The Tribunal shall send a copy of every order passed under this section to all the parties concerned.
(1) Aggrieved by an order of the Tribunal may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(2) No appeal shall lie to the Appellate Tribunal from an order made by the Tribunal with the consent
of parties.
(3) Every appeal shall be filed within a period of forty-five days from the date on which a copy of the
order of the Tribunal is made available to the person aggrieved.
9.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
(4) On the receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal shall, after giving the parties to the appeal a
reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying
or setting aside the order appealed against. The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order
made by it to the Tribunal and the parties to appeal.
Every application made to the Tribunal and appeal made to Appellate Tribunal shall be disposed of as
soon as possible and not later than 3 Months.
Any person aggrieved by any order of the Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the Supreme Court
within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order of the Appellate Tribunal to him on any question
of law arising out of such order:
➢ The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall while disposing of any proceeding are bound to follow
procedure laid down under CPC 1908 and also follow principles of natural justice.
➢ The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall have, for the purposes of discharging their functions
under this Act while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:—
(a) Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
(d) Requisitioning any public record or document or a copy of such record or document from any office;
(g) Setting aside any order of dismissal of any representation for default or any order passed by it ex
parte; and
➢ Any order made by the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal may be enforced by that Tribunal in the same
manner as if it were a decree made by a court in a suit pending therein, and it shall be lawful for the
Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal.
The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall have the same jurisdiction, powers and authority in
respect of contempt of themselves as the High Court subject to modifications that—
9.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
(a) The reference therein to a High Court shall be construed as including a reference to the Tribunal and
the Appellate Tribunal; and
(b) The reference to Advocate-General shall be construed as a reference to such Law Officers as the
Central Government may, specify in this behalf.
The address for service of summons shall be filed with every appeal or petition or application or caveat
on behalf of a party and shall as far as possible contain the following items namely:-
(a) The name of the road, street, lane and Municipal Division or Ward, Municipal Door and other
number of the house;
(d) Any other particulars necessary to locate and identify the addressee such as fax number, mobile
number, valid e-mail address, if any.
(1) At the foot of every petition or appeal or pleading there shall appear the name and signature of the
authorised representative.
SPECIAL COURTS
As per Section 435 of the Companies Act, the Central Government may, for the purpose of providing
speedy trial of offences under this Act, by notification, establish or designate as many Special Courts
as may be necessary.
A single judge holding office as Session Judge or Additional Session Judge, in case of
offences punishable under this Act with imprisonment of two years or more; and
A Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, in the case of other
offences, who shall be appointed by the Central Government with the concurrence of the Chief
Offences
Justice Triable by Special
of the High Courtswhose
Court within (Section 436)
jurisdiction the judge to be appointed is working.
(a) All offences specified shall be triable only by the Special Court established for the area in which the
registered office of the company is situated and where there are more special courts one such area
specified by High Court.
9.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
(b)Where a person accused of, or suspected of the commission of, an offence under this Act is forwarded
to a Magistrate such magistrate may authorise detention of person as thinks fit but not exceeding 15
days in case of Judicial Magistrate and 7 days where it is Executive magistrate.
Provided that where such Magistrate considers that the detention of such person upon or before the
expiry of the period of detention is unnecessary, he shall order such person to be forwarded to the
Special Court having jurisdiction;
(c) A Special Court may, upon perusal of the police report of the facts constituting an offence under
this Act or upon a complaint in that behalf, take cognizance of that offence without the accused being
committed to it for trial.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Special Court
may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary way any offence under this Act which is punishable with
imprisonment for a term not exceeding Three years:
Maximum period of Imprisonment in case of Summary trial shall not exceed One year.
SELFNOTES-
9.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Introduction
➢ Extra -territorial jurisdiction
➢ Applies to whole India including Jammu and Kashmir.
➢ Effective from 17th Oct, 2000.
➢ Amended Information technology act was passed on 2008
Non-applicability:-
➢ Negotiable instrument (other than cheque).
➢ Power – of – attorney.
➢ Will
➢ Trust
➢ Contract for sale or conveyance for immovable property.
7.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Electronic Governance:-
❖ Section 4:- The Act grants legal recognition of electronic records by laying out that
where “Information or any other matter is to be in-
➢ Writing ,
➢ Typewritten from , or
➢ Printed from ,
Such info can be maintain in
➢ Electronic form which should be made available
➢ And assessable for subsequent reference.
❖ Section 5 : LR TO DS
➢ Where any law provide that information or any other document shall be signed or
authenticated by affixing signature , such requirements shall be deemed to have been
satisfied , if such information or document is authenticated by means of digital signature ,
in such a manner as many be prescribed by central government.
7.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Section 6A:-
➢ Appropriate government, may authorise service providing to set up, maintain and
upgrade the computerise facility and perform such other service as may be specified.
➢ Services provider can be any individual, private agency, company, partnership firm, sole
proprietor or any other body.
Section 8A:-
➢ Government can publish any notification either in official gazette or in electronic gazette,
either of 2 gazettes shall be deemed to be date of publication.
7.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Date of offer and date of acceptance are crucial to know which contract are into existence
and when thus time of dispatch and receipt are imported.
Time of Dispatch:-
Time of Receipt:-
Certifying Authority:-
➢ Certifying authority is a body whose central responsibility is to issue, revoke, renew and
provide directories of electronic certificate.
➢ Certifying authority also means person who has granted a license to issue Electronic
Signature Certificate.
➢ Any person may make an application to [CA] certifying authority as may be prescribe by
central government for issue of ESC ,
➢ Such application must be made with prescribed fees.
➢ Application shall be accompanied by certification of parties or statement containing such
particulars.
➢ After making required inquires, CA may grant ESC or may reject application along with
reasonable reason.
➢ Such rejection may be made only after applicant given OOBH.
Appellate Tribunal:-
➢ It is body establish under this act to exercise the jurisdiction, power and authority.
➢ Central government to appoint appellate tribunal by notification.
➢ Central government powers and authority to appellate tribunal.
➢ Appellate tribunal may mark compounding of offence and recovery of penalties.
7.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
7.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Network service provides i.e. intermediaries include telecom SP, network SP, internet SP,
web-hosting SP, search engines, online payment sites, etc.
➢ Act declares that above stated intermediaries shall not be liable ‘ under this act, rule or
regulations made thereunder,’ if he proves offence or contravention was committed
without his knowledge or that he has excised all due diligence to prevent commission of
offence or contravention .
SELF NOTES
7.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
PREAMBLE
2.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
STATE: - ARTICLE 12
(a) Government & (b) Government & (c) All local & other authority
Parliament of India Legislature of each State
I) within the territory of India
II) Under the control of GOI
Entire share capital Assistance of state Monopoly Deep & Function Dept.
held by Govt. To meet expenditure pervasive are of transfer
Of Corporation control public to
Importance corporation
4) ARTICLE 13
Will become void to extent they are any law made inconsistent with
Inconsistent with fundamental right. Fundamental Right will be void.
5) DOCTRINE OF SEVERABILITY
2.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
Equality before Law (-ve term) Equal Protection of Law (+ve term)
2.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
ARTICLE 15 (1)
ARTICLE 15 (2)
ARTICLE 15 (4) say that special provision for SC, ST, socially & education backward classes of citizen.
ARTICLE 16(1)
State can make prohibition for reservation of appointment or post for backward class.
11) ARTICLE 17 says untouchability is abolished & its practice is forbidden. It’s a punishable offence.
[ABOLITION OF UNTOUCHABILITY]
2.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
State shall not give title like sir, Rai Bahadur etc.
(Military or academic titles can be given)
13) ARTICLE 19
FREEDOM OF SPEECH & EXPRESSION
➢ 19(1)(a) -> All citizen shall have right to freedom of speech & expression
• Right to make good or bad speech
• Right include not to speech
• Freedom of press & publish one’s opinion is also included
• Freedom of peaceful demonstration, dramatic performance, and cinematography included.
RESTRICTION :- (a) Sovereign and Integrity of India,(b) Security of State,(c) Friendly relation with foreign State,(d) Public
order,(e) Decency or Morality,(f) Contempt of Court,(g) Defamation,(h) Incitement of offence.
CASES
➢ 19(1) (b) -> All citizen have right to assemble peaceful and without arms.
Reasonable Restriction -> (a) Sovereign and Integrity of India, (b) Public order
➢ 19(1) (c) -> All citizen have right to become or not to become member of association.
Reasonable Restriction -> (a) Sovereign and Integrity of India, (b) Public order, (c) Morality
➢ 19(1) (d) -> Right to move freely throughout the territory of India. It does not include to travel abroad.
Reasonable Restriction -> (a) In the interest of the general public, (b) Protection of the interest of any schedule
tribe.
2.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
➢ 19(1) (e) -> Right to reside and settle in any part of territory of India.
Reasonable Restriction -> (a) In the interest of the general public, (b) Protection of the interest of schedule tribe.
➢ 19(1) (f) -> All citizen have right to practice any profession, trade, occupation, business.
Reasonable Restriction -> (a) In the interest of the general public, (b) Professional or technical qualification,
(c)State can create monopolies.
➢ No person can be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
Condition
• No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by Law.
• Procedure established by law means procedure established by statute or prescribed by Law of the state.
CASES
2.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
vs vs vs
Y.J Gonsalvis State of madras State of UP
Right to life include right Narrow meaning was given Personal liberty is not limited to
To make life meaningful. To expression personal liberty. Bodily restraint
• Right to travel abroad is included within expression ‘personal liberty’. (Satwant Singh vs Assistant Passport
Officer)
• Right to personal liberty includes right to bail, public interest, litigation, right to free legal.
Person can’t be such person will have right should be produces in nearest magistrate
Arrested without to consult & defended within 24 hours of arrest excluding Time
Informing him by Lawyer. Of Journey (cannot be detained beyond
Grounds for such 24 hours)
Arrest
But the above safeguards are not applicable to alien enemies and
Person arrested or detained under preventive detention
Preventive Detention
Detention of a person Objective is not to punish neither offence is proved Person likely to commit
Without trial. But to prevent him from nor charge is formulated. Act forbidden by Law.
Doing it.
2.7
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
Person cannot be detained beyond Parliament can prescribed Ground should be communicated to person
3 Month unless Advisory Board max. Period for detention. Detained & opportunity of making
Consisting High Court Judge Order. Presentation against order should be given.
Complete ban on traffic in human Traffic in human being means to Beggar means involuntary work
Being, beggar & forced Labour. Deal in men & women like goods. Without payment.
2) ARTICLE 24 prohibits employment of children below the age of 14 year in any factory or mine
[PROHIBITION OF EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN]
25) ARTICLE 21A [RIGHT TO EDUCATION] -> State shall provide free & compulsory
education to all children of the Age of 6 to 14 years.
2.8
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
ARTICLE 25 -> Follow & promote own religion ARTICLE 26 -> Maintain institution for religion purpose
I) Person has right to follow & promote his religion. Guarantee to every religious denomination of the
ii) Equal respect for all religion following right:-
I) Right to establish religious charitable purpose.
ii) Right to manage own affairs.
iii) Right to own & acquire movable and immovable
property
iv) Right to administer property.
ARTICLE 27-> No tax if charity towards religious ARTICLE 28 -> No religious instruction in any
Purpose. Education Institution.
I) Person can’t be compelled to pay tax. No religious instruction shall be provided in any
Ii) Proceeds of which are spent for expenditure Education Institution wholly maintained out of state
Of promotion of particular religion. Fund.
➢ ARTICLE 29 -> I) All citizen in India have right to converse their language, script or culture.
ii) No citizen shall be detained for admission into any educational institution
Maintained by State on ground of religion, race caste, language or any of them.
➢ ARTICLE 30 -> I) All minorities have right to establish & administer educational institution
ii) State shall not discriminate any educational institution on ground of minority.
Power of parliament to restrict Parliament can identify any Parliament can by express provision
Or abrogate FR to member of person in services of union or state can restrict FR.
Armed forces, para. Military for act done during martial law.
Forces, police forces &
Analogous force.
2.9
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
1] 2] 3] 4] 5]
If there is conflict between FR and DP, earlier FR will prevails, now Harmonious Construction is given
2.10
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
When both houses or one not President will take advice of Ordinance laid before Parliament
In session. Council of Minister. When reassemble.
(Same as of ordinance making power of Parliament) (Parliament is substituted with State Legislative)
Bill contain same provisions Governor thinks to reserve Act contains same provision
Which require approval of bills for consideration of require consideration of
President. President. President.
2.11
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
Entries in different list to be Particular law deals with subject what you cannot do directly cannot
Interpreted in a way to give in one list also touches subject do indirectly.
Effect to both & to avoid in another list then true object of
Conflict. Legislation is to be determined.
37) Delegated Legislation -> Legislation delegating power of law to other authorities like executive and judiciary.
• HABEAS CORPUOS
2.12
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
• MANDAMUS
Command Issued to direct any person, requiring him or Particular thing which is of
Corporation, Inferior, youth, court. It to do. Public duty.
Mandamus can’t be issued against the president or Governor (Discretionary remedy of court)
• PROHIBITION
• CERTIORARI
• QUO-WARRANTOR
2.13
CS SHUBHAM MODI. 8087676157
SELFNOTES.
2.14
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676167
Interpretation mean decoding of law / finding out meaning of the rules of law
Object of interpretation is to discover the intention of the author.
Interpretation
Primary Principle:-
Rule of Literal Construction:-
• In general, natural, ordinary and popular object are used interchangeably but not in case
of technical words because technical word has technical meaning
• In simple word we can interpret statute in a straight forward manner.
• This rule also known as golden rule or primary rule of interpretation.
3.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676167
▪ Maxim UT Res Magis Valeat Quam Pareat ,i.e. statute must be constructed in sensibly and
reasonable
▪ In simple word if any word in law gives more than one meaning than court gives
reasonable meaning of such word.
▪ But scope of law should not be broadened necessary matched with interpretation by
court
▪ If letter of law is not clear, then spirit of law should be taken into consideration.
Harmonious Construction:-
➢ While interpreting one provision of law other provision of law cannot be ignored.
➢ There must not be conflict between various provisions of law.
➢ Interpretation should be made in such a way that act as a whole serves a useful purpose.
➢ If may be possible that different section may be contrary to each other , then in such case
attempt should be made to reconcile the provision and to give effect to both
contradictory provisions .
➢ In this way clash can be avoided between sections.
➢ This is known as harmonious construction.
Mischief Rule:-
3.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676167
Other principle:-
1) Noscitur A Sociis: - ‘Word Is Known By Its Associates ’
➢ When two or more words having analogous meaning are coupled together, then one
word shall be constructed in manner deriving its meaning from other.
➢ E.g. plant and machinery
➢ Strict is not to be regarded as including anything which is not within its letter and its spirit
and which is not clearly described in word of statute itself.
➢ Law is interpreted by strict interpretation spirit of law is to be used strictly.
➢ When word fall short of object of legislature, it is duty of judge to make such construction
of statute as shall supress the mischief and advance the remedy.
➢ This is also known as liberal construction.
Presumption:-
Where meaning of law is clear there is no need for presumption. But if intention of legislature
is not clear then following presumption can be taken.
➢ Word of statue use precisely and not loosely.
➢ Guilty mind is required for a criminal act.
➢ Statute is not intended to be inconsistent with the principle of international law.
3.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676167
➢ Legislature does not make any alteration inexistent law unless express by enactment.
➢ Legislature does not make mistake.
➢ Law compels man from doing which is fruitless.
➢ Doctrine of natural justice.
➢ Legislature knows the state of law.
1. Parliamentary History
2. Historical Facts & Circumstances
3. Reference to reports of Committees
4. Reference to other Statutes
5. Dictionaries
6. Use of foreign Decision
SELFNOTES-
3.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Introduction:-
Torts is French word derived from Latin word ‘Tortum’ which means ‘Wrong’. But every wrong or
wrongful act is not a tort.
Definition:-
Torts may be define as a civil wrong which is other than a mere breach of trust.
4.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Infringement of absolute private right without any actual damages or loss is Injuria sine
Damnum.
➢ Case law Ashby vs. White
Candidate was refused to give vote amounts to infringement of legal right
Men’s Rea :-( guilty mind / wrong intention) actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea means act
itself create no guilt in the absence of guilty mind. This is not applicable in case of torts (Following
Cases)
Exception: -
1) Damage due to natural use of land.
2) Act of god.
3) Consent of plaintiff.
4) Act under authority of statute.
5) Plaintiff’s own default 6) Act of third party.
(2) Absolute Liability :-
a) Court held that rule of Rayland’s vs. Fletcher did not fully meets the need of modern industrial
society and so evolved a new a new rule of ‘absolute liability’.
b) More strict rule was laid down by Supreme Court in case M. C. Mehta vs. Union of India
c) Court pointed out that enterprise cannot escape liability by showing that it had taken all the
reasonable care and there was no negligence on its part.
d) New rule in Mehta’s case is not strict. But absolute and in subject to no negligence own.
e) It is applicable to Dangerous and Hazardous Industries
B) Vicarious Liability:-
Normally, tortfeasor is liable for his tort but in some case, a person may be held liable for tort
committed by another. Sometime such liability arises from relation existing between.
4.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
D) Malicious Prosecution:-
• If an accused getting final decision is his favour he can file a suit for damages on basis of
his malicious prosecution.
• For applicability following condition should be satisfied
1. Must have been prosecution by defendant of plaintiff.
2. Must have been want of reasonable cause of that prosecution.
3. Defendant must have acted maliciously.
4. Due to prosecution, plaintiff must have suffer damages.
5. Prosecution must have terminated in favour of plaintiff.
E) Defamation:-
• False statement, affecting reputation of other without any just cause or excuse.
Method of defamation:-
4.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
• Libel: - relatively permanent and fix mean to harm reputation of person. E.g. - libel has
served punishment then slander.
• Section 499 – IPC both are criminal acts and punishable
Conditions:-
1. Statement must be defamatory.
2. Statement must be false
3. Statement must be for plaintiff.
F) Nervous Shock:-
• When a person is injured merely by nervous shock.
• May be due to he has seen or heard something.
• Some injury or illness must take place then only it will be treated as tort.
G) Bodily Harm:-
• Wilful act defendant.
• Causing physical harm to plaintiff
Remedies in tort:-
1) Judicial Remedies:-
Damage /compensation.
Injunction
Specification restitution of property
a) Self-defence - person can use reasonable force to protect himself. Or against any person who
using force unlawfully.
b) Prevention of trespass: - authorise person may use reasonable force to prevent trespass
entering or to eject them.
3) Re-Entry on Land:-
➢ Person who wrongfully disposed of land may retake possession of land if he can do so in
peaceful and reasonable manner
4) Recaption:-
➢ Person is entitled to take goods either peacefully or by use of reasonable force against, who
wrongfully taken or detained it.
5) Abatement of Nuisance:-
➢ Occupier of land may lawfully abate (terminate) any nuisance injuriously affecting it.
4.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Occupier may lawfully ceases anything is unlawfully in his lad doing damage there also can
detained them until compensation is paid for damages
SELFNOTES-
4.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Introduction
• This law specifies limit for every dispute so as to put an end to litigation in the interest of
saving time money of state and general public.
• Law is base on principal of, ‘Vigilantisbust Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt’ i.e. law aids
diligent (active) and not indolent (lazy).
Bombay dyeing and manufacturing company ltd. vs. state of Bombay.
➢ Whenever any party gets right, it also has remedy.
➢ No one can post pone right of remedy.
➢ Law relating to specifically tells period, till aggrieved party can get remedy.
Applicability:-
➢ Any suit appeal or application if made beyond the prescribed period of limitation, it is a
duty of court not to proceed with such suit irrespective of fact whether plea of limitation
has been set up in defence or not, it is mandatory.
Section 4:- it states that if period of limitation ends on a day when the court is closed, it will
extend up to the day when court re-opens.
Limitation Bar Remedy But Does Not Extinguish Right
5.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ When limitation period expires, right of party to file suit for remedy is debarred .however,
original right of party is not barred. So, limitation bares only remedy not the right.
➢ So , claims claim can settled outside the court even after period of limitation expires
➢ Sec 5 lays down that, appeal or application may be admitted by court even after the
expiry of prescribe period of limitation, if is satisfied that appellant or applicant has
prevented by sufficient reason, from not making application within period of limitation.
➢ It applies only to appeal and application and to suit.
➢ However, it is courts discretion to extend or not to extend period of limitation
Sufficient cause:-
➢ Mistake of high court which mis leads appellant to not filling appeal.
➢ Mistake of counsel.
➢ Mistake of law in establishing or exercising the right given by law.
➢ Wrong advice given by advocate.
➢ Person or illness.
➢ Time taken to obtain the certified copy of decree or judgment.
➢ Ailment of father during defendant was looking after him
➢ Non-availability of file of case not sufficient.
This section applicable when a person who can institute a suit appeal or make application is
➢ Disable with minority , insane
➢ It applies to suit, appeal or application.
➢ This section applies only if disability exist the time when of limitation period starts.
➢ Any subsequent disability not attract this section.
➢ If a person suffering from disability and before recovering he suffered another disability
then he can file case after recovering all the disability.
Section 7:-
➢ This section applies when several people are jointly entitles to institute the suit or male
application and several person, or one of them affected by disability.
5.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ If consent of person who is suffering from disability is not necessary – then original period
will continue.
➢ If consent of disable person is necessary – then period of limitation will extend to all
person.
Section 8:-
➢ According to this section, period of limitation cannot extend beyond three year from date
of cessation of legal disability. However, if original period of limitation computed from
accrual of cause of action is more than 3 year after cessation of disability such person will
be allowed.
➢ When the time has begun to run no subsequent disability or inability will stop this running
time. In other words, when limitation period started no subsequent disability can stop it.
➢ Specific days are excluded from counting days of limitation period -Section 12
1) In suit day – day on which period begins to run.
2) In appeals – day on which period begins to run. Application.
Day of pronouncement of judgment.
Day of obtaining copy.
3) Application to set – day on which period began run ,
Aside award – day of obtain copy of award
4) Other application – day on which period begins to run.
Death of Party (Section 16): If a person dies before the right to sue arises then the limitation
period will commence only when the legal representative will come into existence.
Fraud (Section 17): Where the suit or application is based upon the fraud or mistake of the
defendant or respondent or his agent the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the
plaintiff or applicant has discovered fraud or mistake
Effect of Acknowledgment on the Period of Limitation [Sec18]:-
➢ Tis section applies if one party against who right are claimed, acknowledgement the
liability in writing before expiry of limitation period.
➢ If one party gives valid acknowledgement to another about acceptance of liability, then a
fresh period of limitation commences from date acknowledgment.
➢ Acknowledgment must be valid acknowledgment.
Essential:-
➢ Acknowledgment before expiration of limitations period.
➢ Acknowledgment must be made against party whom right is claimed.
5.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Legislature may enact any law relating to limitation or can change the existing rule of
limitation either by shortening or extending time provided in original law and after
enforcement of such new law or changes existing right becomes barred under amended
statute.
➢ Case law: - state of MP vs Bhai Lal Bhai – limitation act does not in terms apply to
proceeding under article 32 and 226 of constitution. But court may refused relief if delay
is more than statutory period of limitation.
1) Period of 30 years :-
➢ Maximum period provided in limitation act is 30 years.
➢ Suit buy mortgager for recovery of possession of immovable property mortgage.
➢ Suit by mortgagee for foreclosure.
➢ Suit by or on behalf of central govt or state govt
2) Period of 12 years :-
➢ Various kinds of suits relating to immovable property trust and endowments.
3) Period of 43 years :-
➢ Relating to torts and other miscellaneous matter.
5.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
4) Period in days varying between 90 to 100 days minimum period provided in limitation act
is 10 day for application for leave ‘to appear and defend a suit under summary procedure
from date of service of summons.
SELFNOTES-
5.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
Types of offence:-
1) Bailable: - offence which are shown as Bailable in first schedule.
2) Non Bailable: - other than Bailable.
3) Cognizable: - police officer have authority to arrest any person even without warrant
generally cognizable = non Bailable
4) Non cognizable: - police officer has no authority to arrest any person without warrant
generally non-cognizable = Bailable offence.
6.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
Temporary release of accused from legal custody and entrusting them to private custodian
becomes a surety to produce accused whenever needed.
Complaint:-
➢ Any allegation made orally or in writing to magistrate with view to taking some action
against some person whether known or unknown has committed offence [does not
include police report.
➢ Any petition addressed to magistrate containing an allegation that offence has been
committed and ending with prayer is complaint.
2) Inquiry:-
6.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
3) Trial:-
Arrest of a person:-
1) Prevention Arrest
6.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
➢ Cognizable offence.
➢ Housebreaking without any excuse or justification.
➢ Proclaimed as an offender.
➢ Committed any act outside India, which is punishable in India if committed in India.
➢ Person is imposition of stolen property.
➢ Obstruction to police officer.
➢ Deserted from armed force.
➢ Requisition has been received for cognizable offence from other police.
➢ If any person accused of committing a non-congnible offence doesn’t give his name ,
Residence, or gives name, residence which police feels to be false, he may be taken into
custody.
➢ Can’t be detained beyond 24 hours, send to magistrate if true name and address cannot
be ascertain.
➢ Private person may arrest any person who in his person commits a non-Bailable or
cognizable offence. Who is proclaimed offender.
5) Arrest by Magistrate:-
➢ Magistrate may arrest any person who in his presence commits a non-Bailable offence.
Power is wider of magistrate as it can also issue an arrest warrant against any person.
➢ Armed person has committed any offence off duty then he can be arrested but not while
discharging his official duties.
➢ Authorise a police officer or other person making an arrest to actually touch or confide
the body of a person be arrested.
6.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
Essential:-
1) Should be in writing.
2) Should be in duplicate.
3) Should be signed by presiding officer.
4) It should contain seal of court.
5) It should be clear and specific.
6) Mention exact day, date, time, of present.
7) Person should be ascertained.
8) Service of summons
Summons if the concerned As per section 65, a summon can be served to the male
person is not found adult of the family if the concerned person is not found.
If no one is found at the home or As per section 65, if no one is found at home then affix
household the duplicate copy of summon to conspicuous part of
the home or household where the summoned person
ordinarily resides.
Summon in case of Government A summon shall ordinarily be sent to the Head of Office
Employee in which such person is employed.
Requirements:-
1) Should be in writing.
2) Must be sealed.
3) Must be signed by presiding officer.
4) Must be given full name and description.
5) Must bear name and designation of person.
6) Must state the offence charged.
6.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
Search warrant:-
Can be issued only in following cases
➢ When court has reason to believe that person summon to produce any document or
anything will not produce it.
➢ Were such document or thing is not known to the court to be in possession of any person.
➢ Where general inspection or search is necessary
Information to police:-
A. In case of cognizable cases :-
Information relating to any cognizable offence if given orally to officer in charge of police
station shall be recorded in writing and it is known as First Information Report (FIR).
In case cognizable case police may conduct investigation without order of magistrate.
➢ Police officer in charge may without warrant may enter into any place within limit of such
station and conduct inspection or search weights, measuring instrument.
➢ It is only when he has reason to believe that there in such place weight, measures,
instrument are false.
➢ If he find, anything wrong then he may seize the same and give information to magistrate
having thee jurisdiction.
4) Search by warrant:-
➢ If any police officer in-charge refuse to record to any information given by person then
such person may apply to superintendent. If superintendent is satisfied may act inquiry
on same by himself or direct any subordinate.
6.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
1) Issuing Of Proclamation:-
2) Attachment of Property:-
➢ Object of attachment of property is not to punish him but to compel his appearance.
➢ Limitation :-
1. 6month – punishable with fine only.
2. 1 year – imprisonment not more than 1year.
3. 3 year – imprisonment not more than 3 year.
In case continuing offence, fresh period of limitation being to run at every movement during
which offence continues.
Summary Trials:-
6.7
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676517
➢ Disposal at ones.
➢ Cases:-
1) Related to offence punishable with imprisonment up to 2 year.
2) Related to property value does not exceeding Ru 200
3) Theft of property amount not exceeding Ru. 200
4) Retaining of stolen the property of amounting up to Ru 200
5) Disposal of stolen property amount not exceeding Ru 200
➢ Authority to conduct :-
1) Chief judicial magistrate.
2) Metropolitan magistrate.
3) Magistrate if first class.
SELFNOTES.
6.8
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Introduction:-
➢ Come into force 1st January, 1909.
➢ Extend to whole of India exclude Jammu and Kashmir
CODES
Definition:-
1) Cause of Action:-
➢ Every fact that it would be necessary for the plaintiff to prove in order to support his right
to the judgment of court.
➢ All essential fact constituting right and its infringement.
2) Decree:-
➢ It is final adjudication of right of parties’ conclusively in respect of any matter or all matter.
➢ E.g. in suit between Vaibhav and Vaishnavi, Vaibhav may claim particular property belong
to him. After hearing all argument court will rule in favour of either Vaibhav or Vaishali.
➢ Thus, the final decision regarding this claim is decree
➢ Feature:-
1) Determine right of parties conclusively.
2) It is always conclusive.
3) Decree is final adjudication.
4) May related to any issue or issues.
5) Decree is contained in judgment.
7.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
3) Judgment:-
➢ Identical matters directly or substantially is issued in two suits are same, then subsequent
suit must be stayed.
➢ This doctrine states that, when suit filed between same parties at two different time and
both suits are substantially same matter and previous suit is still pending incompetent
court in India then court may put stay on subsequent suit.
➢ This doctrine does not restrict institution of suit, it only bars trial of suit i.e. letter suit is not
dismissed it only stayed.
➢ Object –
1. Avoid wastage of time
2. Avoid conflict of decision
3. Avoid wastage of resources.
7.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Essential condition :-
1. Two suits must be instituted at different time.
2. Matter of both suits must be directly and substantially same.
3. Suit between same parties.
4. Previous suit must be pending.
➢ Case law :- Wigs Pharmaceuticals Vs. Swan Pharmaceuticals
➢ This doctrine simply restricts the repetition of suit for same title between same parties.
➢ This rule state that, no one shall be twice harassed for same cause.
➢ Essential :-
1. Two different suits at different time
2. Both matters are substantially same.
3. Same parties.
4. Previous suit is conclusively decided.
5. Court in which previous suit decided is competent
Place of suing:-
Set off
Reciprocal acquittal of Equitable set off Counter claim
debts
7.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
and b shown decree of Ru. shows advance receipt of be recover from A. such
40000 then a will get only Ru. 50000 then A will get amount become counter
Ru. 60000 after set off only 50000 after equitable claim
set off.
7) At 1sthearing of suit.
➢ Jurisdiction over sub matter – certain court are limited to accept case relating to particular
subject matter only.
➢ Jurisdiction Over person – all person of any nationality is subject to jurisdiction of civil court
except some foreign suit.
➢ Territorial jurisdiction – territorial limit of jurisdiction for each court has been decided/
fixed by government.
➢ Pecuniary jurisdiction depending value of suit – there is no pecuniary limit on jurisdiction
of high value and district court.
➢ Original jurisdiction
➢ Appellate jurisdiction
➢ Criminal and appellate jurisdiction
7.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Reference:-
➢ When question of law is involved in a suit and lower court has a reasonable doubt about
such question of law, then lower court may take reference from the higher court.
➢ Application of reference can be made by parties to suit or by court itself.
Review:-
Revision:-
Injunction
Temporary Injunction:-
7.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Appeal:-
➢ Appeal is an application by which party request appellate court to set aside or modify
decision of subordinate court.
2) Second Appeal:-
➢ Second appeal lies in high court against decree pass by any of subordinate court.
➢ Appeal must be of substantial question of law
➢ Appeal can be filed to supreme court in respect of those decree which have been passed
by high court
Cases:- Any decree or order of civil court , thinks fit to appeal to supreme court or when
special leave is granted by supreme court it self
• Any judgment, decree or order passed by high court or any other final appellate tribunal.
• Any judgment, decree or order passed by high court in exercise of original civil
jurisdiction.
➢ Parties to appeal shall not be entitled to produce any additional evidence .but supreme
court can allow additional evidence in following circumstances.
a) When lower court has refused to admit evidence, which ought to have been admitted.
7.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Misjoinder of Parties:-
➢ If plaintiff is not jointly interested in all the cause of action there is misjoinder of cause of
act
➢ Any object regarding misjoinder of parties or cause of action should at first hearing of suit
Summary procedure:-
Object of summary procedure is to prevent unreasonable obstruction, where defendant has
no defence.
• Applicability promissory notes, cheques, hundis suit in which plaintiff seeks to recover a
debt.
➢ Application to high court, city civil court, small court, other court authorise by high court.
➢ Effect – court passes decree without giving defendant opportunity of defence.
➢ Sum, suit must be brought within year however limitation on negotiable is 3 year.
➢ Leave to defend- 10days for defendant
7.7
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Service of summons
Subject to any provision regulating service of process, where the suit is against a corporation,
the summons may be served:
3. The Court may at any stage of the suit, require the personal appearance of the secretary
or any director, or other principal officer of the corporation who may be able to answer
material questions relating to the suit. (O.29, R.3)
Order 32 of Civil Procedure Code deals with the provision relating to suits by or against
minor.
7.8
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ When minor becomes major then he has to elect whether to continue the case or a
abandoned the case. If he abandons the case then the case shall be dismissed. Here, they
may enforce some cost upon the minor.
SELF NOTES-
7.9
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Introduction
• Passed in year 1860.
• Come in force on 1stjan 1862.
• Applicable to whole of India except state of Jammu and Kashmir.
• It is substantive law of crime.
Crime committed within the territory of India, court can trail and punish irrespective of fact
that is person Indian nationality or foreigner.
Exception –
Where crime is committed outside territory of India by Indian national such person may be
trial and punishable in Indian court.
8.1
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
1) Human being: - The first requirement for commission of crime is that the act must be committed
by a human being. Only a human being is subject to IPC.
Stage of crime:-
1) Criminal intention: - it is firs stage in commission of offence. Intention means doing any act
with one’s will, desire, voluntariness, malafides and for some purpose...
8.2
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Exception:-
➢ Preparation to wage war against government.
➢ Preparation for counterfeiting of coins or government stamps.
➢ Possessing counterfeit coins , false weights , measurement or forged documents
➢ Making preparation to commit dacoity.
Punishment:-
1) Death: - hardest punishment provided in IPC. Only in case of following offences.
➢ Murder
➢ Dacoity with murder
➢ Waging war against government
➢ Abetting mutiny actually committed
➢ Giving false evidence on which innocent person suffers death
➢ Abetment of a suicide by minor or insane person
➢ Attempted murder by life convict
3) Imprisonment :-
➢ Simple imprisonment ,
➢ Rigorous imprisonment that is hard labour.
8.3
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
5) Fine: - fine is forfeiture of money by way of penalty. It should be impose individually and
not collectively
Criminal conspiracy:-
8.4
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Essential:-
Case law:-
8.5
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Cheating [sec415 to 420]; - cheating can be define as dishonest or unfair act done to gain
advantage over the other.
1) Section 415 :-
➢ Whoever, deceives any person fraud or dishonestly.
➢ Includes him to deliver any property to any person or to give consent to retain any
property ,
➢ Or includes person to do or omit anything which he would not do if not deceived.
➢ And such act or omission cause or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in
body, mind, reputation or property.
➢ It is said to ‘cheat’
8.6
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
Ingredient:-
➢ Removal, deliver or concealment of property.
➢ Act must be dishonest or fraudulent.
➢ For inadequate consideration.
➢ To prevent payment to creditors.
➢
2) Dishonest /Fraudulent Preventing Debt Being Available For Creditors [Sec 422]
➢ Person fraudulently preventing the payment of debt amount to creditors.
➢ Person has means of returning his loan but not availing such means will be covered under
this sec.
8.7
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ D/F sings exacted or becomes party of any deed or instrument which contains false
statement.
➢ Relating to consideration or person who will avail benefit.
➢ Punishment – imprisonment up to 2/ year fine or both.
Exceptions:-
Kinds of Defamation:-
8.8
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
➢ Libel: - statement in permanent and visible from i.e. writing printing, pictures.
➢ Slander: - made in spoken words or other transitory form whether visible or quibble i.e.
gestures.
➢ Punishment :- imprisonment up to 2 year or fine or both
➢ Whoever sales or offer for sale any printed or engraved substance containing defamatory
matter, knowingly that it contains such matter.
➢ Shall punishable with imprisonment of 2 year or fine or both.
Essential:-
➢ Defamatory statement as per sec 499 of IPC
➢ Printed or engraved.
➢ Accused knew such matter.
➢ Sold or offered for sale defamatory matter.
General Explanation: - These Are Those Cases Are Where Men’s Rea Is
Absent Thus Are Not Crime.
1) Mistake of law bound by law [sec 76 ]
• Not guilty if commits any act –
o Which he is bound to do
o Mistakenly believe in good faith that he is bond by law to do it.
• Absence of guilty mind.
8.9
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
10) Act of person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication cased against his will [sec
85].
12) Act not intended to be likely to cause death or grievous hurt ,done by consent .[sec87]
Any act without any intention to cause death or // without knowledge of /// to any person
who is more than 18 and consented to take the risk then person doing the act has committed
no offence
13) Act not intended to cause death ,done by consent in good faith for person benefit (88)
16) Exclusion of act which are offence independently to harm caused. [sec91]
17) Act done in good faith for benefit of a person without concern. [sec 92]
8.10
CS SHUBHAM MODI 8087676157
SELF NOTES
8.11
Right to information Act, 2005
The Government enacted RTI Act, 2005 which came into force w.e.f. October 12, 2005. This act entitles
every Indian citizen to seek information from a public authority in prescribed manner in order to
promote transparency and accountability in the working of such public authority. This Act extends to
whole of India except Jammu & Kashmir. Page | 1
Before dwelling on the RTI Act, 2005, mention should be made that in R.P. Limited v Indian Express
Newspapers, the Supreme Court read into Article 21 the right to know
Partial access [sec10]:- Only part of record or information which is allowed under right to
information to provide and which is not exempted from RIT may be provided.
In case of partial access, following information has to give to be given to applicant –
Disposals of request:-
Dispose a request within 30 days either providing information or by rejecting the
request.
Provide information within 48 hours if it is related to life or liberty of person.
35 days where request is made to AIPO.
If inserts of 3rd party is involved then time limit will be 40 days.
Times taken for calculation of fees excluded from above stated time.
If request rejected, state the reason.
Information Exempted From Disclosure [Sec 8]:-
Information effecting national security ,
Information invading privacy of individual
Information forbidden by court.
Information effecting any investigation or prosecution proceeding.
Information privileged to legislature.
Information related to trade secrets ,intellectual property rights , etc
Cabinet paper.
CIC
5 years Or 65 age
Earlier
UNIQUE ACADEMY CS SHUBHAM MODI- 8087676157
Section 15 and 16 - State Information Commission (SIC)
Page | 4
Constituted Appointed by Governor Salary of SCIC same Headquarter of SIC at any
by SG on recommendation as that of an Election place as SG may specify
of a Committed Commissioner and other offices established
with approval of SG
Consisting one State Chief Committee shall consist of
Information Commissioner Chief Minister as Chairman,
(SCIC) and not more than Leader of opposition in Salary of SIC
10 State Information Legislative Assembly and Will be same as that
Commissioners one Cabinet Minister of Chief Secretary of SG
not exceeding 10 nominated by CM
Power of IC:-
The Central Information Commission/State Information Commission has a duty to receive complaints from
any person in the following circumstances —
If the Commission feels satisfied, an enquiry may be initiated and while initiating an enquiry the
Commission has same powers as vested in a Civil Court.
APPELLATE AUTHORITIES
Any person who does not receive a decision within the specified time or is aggrieved by a decision of the
PIO may file an appeal under the Act.
Page | 5
Time Limit - within 30 days from the expiry of Time Limit - within 90 days of the first appeal
the prescribed time limit or from the receipt of the decision
decision
Extension of time to file appeal – may be granted
if there is sufficient cause.
Disposal Time – Within 30 days from the date of
receipt (Extension possible 15 days)
Third Party appeal against PIO's decision must be filed within 30 days before first Appellate Authority;
and, within 90 days of the decision on the first appeal, before the appropriate Information Commission
which is the second appellate authority.
PENALTIES
Jurisdiction of Courts
Lower Courts are barred from entertaining suits or applications against any order made under this Act.
Section 23 - Jurisdiction of Courts
Develop and organize educational programmes for the public, especially disadvantaged
communities on RTI.
Page | 6
Encourage public authorities to participate in the development and organization of such
programme.
Promote timely and effective dissemination of accurate information by the public authorities.
Compile and disseminate a User’s Guide for the public in the respective official language.
Publish names, designations, postal addresses and contact details of PIOs and other information
such as notices regarding fees to be paid, remedies available in law if request is rejected etc.
WHO IS EXCLUDED?
The Act excludes Central Intelligence and Security agencies specified in the Second Schedule like IB,
R&AW, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of
Enforcement, Narcotics Control Bureau, Aviation Research Centre, Special Frontier Force, BSF, CRPF,
ITBP, CISF, NSG, Assam Rifles, Special Service Bureau, Special Branch (CID), Andaman and Nicobar, the
Crime Branch-CID-CB, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Special Branch, Lakshadweep Police. Agencies
specified by the State Governments through a Notification will also be excluded.
The exclusion, however, is not absolute and these organizations have an obligation to provide
Information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations. Further, information
relating to allegations of human rights violation shall be given only with the approval of the Central
Information Commission within forty-five days from the date of the receipt of request. (Section 24]