Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Multimodal Essay
Multimodal Essay
John Limongelli
Professor Ferrara
ENGL 1001
4 April 2024
Solitary confinement is not an effective form of punishment for any human being. What
them from most to all social interactions. It has been used by many nations throughout many
years as an ‘effective’ form of punishment. This punishment is used to stop or reduce violence
that a person has been doing to either themselves or other people in the prison. This may seem
like a simple solution, but there are many side effects that cause harm to the person in this
confinement.
I have conducted a survey with simple questions to see how long the average person
thinks they could last in isolation. 100% of the people who took the survey said that human
beings need to interact with one another. 33% said that they could last in isolation for any time
between one and three days while the rest said they could only last hours within the first day of
isolation. These results back up my thesis that solitary confinement is not an effective form of
punishment for any human beings. The reason being that everyone needs some sort of interaction
with another person and depriving that person of that is not natural for a person. This continues
my reasonings that solitary confinement causes major side effects on people mentally and
physically.
After people have gone through long amounts of time in solitary confinement, some start
to get hallucinations and other perceptual changes. Some hallucinations people have dealt with
Limongelli 2
include hearing people talk when they are in silence. The person might think someone on the
outside is talking to either them or someone else when really there is nobody speaking. In the
good example of this when an inmate tells him, ““I hear sounds-guards saying, ‘They’re going to
cut it [his nerve-damaged leg] off.’ I’m not sure. Did they say it, or is it my imagination?” If they
did say it, the prisoner is suffering from derealization; if they said something else, or something
not directed at him, he is suffering a (paranoid) perceptual distortion; if they said nothing, he is
having a hallucination” (1452). This is an example of a side effect that is commonly thought of
when thinking of what happens to someone when they are alone for too long. Another perceptual
change that goes on with people in solitary confinement is getting irritated or sick of certain
food, actions, or sounds. For example, inmates will already be struggling with being alone for
too long, so they start to get sick of things that are repeated such as eating the same food every
day. Another example could be hearing a sound repeatedly such as a drop of water from a
leaking sink. These things would be considered minor inconveniences for most people but
because of the situation these people are in their reactions are heightened. Grassian supports this
by saying, ““Everything gets exaggerated. After a while, you can’t stand it. Meals-I used to eat
everything they served. Now I can’t stand the smells-the meat-the only thing I can stand to eat is
the bread.” …All 11 inmates denied ever having experienced such symptoms except during
confinement in isolation” (1452). This quote shows how people in solitary confinement go
through different perceptual changes. But people could counter this argument by saying these
people could already be dealing with these problems before solitary confinement, so this
isolation isn’t the cause of their changes. But since Grassian says that 11 inmates have never
experienced these symptoms outside of solitary confinement it is easy to infer that they only
Limongelli 3
occur because of their isolation, disproving that counterargument. Hallucinations and perceptual
changes are reasons why solitary confinement is not an effective method. It is not intended for
After a certain amount of time of being isolated some people have gone through different
types of major anxiety attacks and symptoms. Since most of the time in solitary confinement you
are alone, different thoughts start to occur. After a while someone can become very anxious and
even go through an anxiety attack. Since it can be inferred that people can hallucinate and hear
people when nobody is talking it might also relate to people feeling anxious. Grassian supports
this by saying, “Ten prisoners described massive free-floating anxiety during their incarceration
shortness of breath, panic, tremulousness, and dread of impending death” (1452). This quote can
help provide reasoning for why people who have never had anxiety feel these strong emotions
and reactions. Also, it can show how people who have already been diagnosed with anxiety have
their anxiety heightened when in solitary confinement. While anxiety is a common thought of
side effect when thinking of solitary confinement, people also think of claustrophobia because of
being in a small space all the time. It would be likely to assume that people would have this
reaction alongside anxiety, but this isn’t the case. As Weinstein studied, “80% felt anxiety at
some time during isolation…There was little evidence of claustrophobia.” This is interesting
because this study disproves what people commonly think about claustrophobia but supports the
idea of anxiety in solitary confinement. Weinstein’s study was also conducted with regular
people in isolation for 72 hours compared to inmates who have been in strict solitary
confinement for longer periods of time. This could affect the severity of anxiety or other side
effects. The reason for this is that the effects could be worse in a more strict and longer isolation.
Limongelli 4
This ties back to my thesis that solitary confinement is not an effective form of punishment.
These studies help prove that anxiety can be a bad side effect of this form of punishment.
After being isolated for some time, people may experience violent episodes. Studies have
shown that people who have spent long amounts of time in solitary confinement have shown to
partake in acts of violence. People will follow through with these violent actions even when they
aren’t intentional. This is shown in Grassian’s study when he says, “One prisoner said, “I snap
off the handle over absolutely nothing. Have torn up mail and pictures, throw things around. Try
to control it. Know it only hurts myself”” This quote is an example of an inmate who out of their
own control had random acts of violence. Some inmates tend to become violent for no apparent
reason. Grassian continues this study by mentioning, “Three of these prisoners reported
impulsive self-mutilation; for example, “I cut my wrists-cut myself many times when in
isolation. Now, it seems crazy. But every time I did it, I wasn’t thinking-lost control-cut myself
without knowing what I was doing.”” This quote shows that inmates will even cause violence to
themselves when they don’t realize it. Even when they don’t want to cause any harm to
themselves it is too late to prevent what they have done. This inmate even goes to saying that
looking back it seems crazy and that they lost control of their own actions. This is another reason
why solitary confinement is not an effective method of punishment. These random acts of
violence make solitary confinement an even worse situation for the person and will not end up
learning from their mistakes but instead cause unnecessary harm to themselves or others.