58 329 1 PB

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

eISSN 2345-0363

Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4


Article Number: jws2018001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15544/jws.2018.001

POTENTIAL OF AQUATIC MACROPHYTES EICHHORNIA CRASSIPES, PISTIA


STRATIOTES AND SALVINIA MOLESTA IN PHYTOREMEDIATION OF
TEXTILE WASTEWATER

Sudharshi Wickramasinghe, Chandramali Kumari Jayawardana


Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka,
P.O. Box 02, 70140 Belihuloya, Sri Lanka. E-mail: jayawardanack@yahoo.com

Submitted 14 April 2018; accepted 12 June 2018

Abstract. Phytoremediation is an emerging low cost green technology, which uses plants for treating contaminant in the
environment. Phytoremediation potential of locally available aquatic plants Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth), Pistia
stratiotes (water lettuce) and Salvinia molesta (water fern) in the treatment process of textile wastewater was investi-
gated. The reduction efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total solids (TS), total suspended solids (TSS), total
dissolved solids (TDS), nitrates, phosphates, heavy metals (Cd, Ni and Zn) and total and fecal coliform from the waste-
water by each plant species were estimated. Bioconcentration factors (BCF) and translocation factors (TF) of three plant
species for Cd, Ni and Zn were also estimated in order to identify their heavy metal absorption and translocation capacity.
The results of the study indicated that greater reduction of COD, nitrates, phosphates, total coliform and Zn from the ini-
tial wastewater by the three plant species. The results of the study also suggested that the selected aquatic plants are hy-
peraccumulators of Cd, Ni and Zn metals. The findings of this study suggest that E. crassipes, P. stratiotes and S. molesta
are potential aquatic plants for treating textile waste water.
Keywords: aquatic plants, Eichhornia crassipes, phytoremediation, Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia molesta, textile industry,
textile wastewater.

Introduction duction, relative higher capability of pollutant uptake, and


better purification effects due to direct contact with con-
The textile industry is one of the profitable industries in
taminated water (Singh et al., 2012). The potential of
Sri Lanka. However, large volumes of wastewater arising
aquatic macrophytes for treating wastewater has been
from these operations may cause significant environ-
investigated and reviewed extensively by many authors
mental problems and operational costs for the industry.
(Dhir et al., 2009; Dhote, Dixit, 2009; Mahamood et al.,
Textile wastewater is generally colored, highly alkaline,
2005; Dipu et al., 2011). Aquatic macrophyte E. cras-
and high COD, suspended solids (SS) and contain nitro-
sipes is reported to be effective in converting alkaline pH
gen, phosphates, toxic chemicals, oil and grease and sul-
of wastewater into a neutral level (Mahamood et al.,
phides etc. (Anjana, Thanga, 2011). Dyes present in tex-
2005; Dipu et al., 2011). A similar trend of pH variation
tile wastewater are recognized as toxic to humans and to
by E. crassipes was reported by Sidi, Tank (2014), during
aquatic biota (Sooknah, 2000). Therefore, discharge of
10 days experimental time period. 80% reduction of COD
inadequately treated wastewater to the environment could
in textile wastewater treated with E. crassipes within 18
pose significant environmental and human health issues
days was reported by Kulkarni et al. (2007). Effective-
(Mahamood et al., 2005). However, many small and me-
ness of macrophytes for the treatment of heavymetals in
dium scale industries in Sri Lanka find it difficult to make
the wastewater has been also reported by many authors
use of improved technology and allocate capital for waste
(Ajayi, Ogunbayo, 2012; Mohamad, 2008). Mohamad
treatment operations due to high costs involved in these
(2008) reported a rapid, heavy metal uptake by E. cras-
technologies. This situation often has led to the illegal
sipes during first four days of contact time, and subse-
release of untreated or partially treated wastewater to the
quent reduction during the following days. Vestena et al.
environment (Toprak, Anis, 2017). Therefore, identifica-
(2007) reported E. crassipes and S. auriculata absorbed
tion of potential eco-friendly, cost effective technologies
and accumulated large amounts of Cd, exhibiting their
to treat wastewater is essential for enabling these indus-
potential to be used as phytoremediators. Among floating
tries to better implement their wastewater treatment proc-
macrophytes, Salvinia sp. is reported to have higher affin-
esses.
ity to accumulate heavy metals in their root systems (Su-
Phytoremediation is an emerging low cost green
kumaran, 2013).
technology, which is adopted for treating contaminants in
Even though there is a considerable amount of lit-
the environment using plants (Pivertz, 2001). The term
erature available in the area of phytoremediation potential
“phytoremediation” is a generic term for the group of
of aquatic plants in the global context, a very little re-
technologies that use plants for remediating soils, sludge,
search has been carried out on the phytoremediation po-
sediments and water contaminated with organic and inor-
tential of floating aquatic plants in textile wastewater
ganic contaminants (Flathman, Lanza, 1998).
treatment in Sri Lanka. Many of these reported studies
Aquatic macrophytes are reported to be more effec-
are limited to investigating the phytoremediation poten-
tive in wastewater treatment in comparison to terrestrial
tial of aquatic plants such as reeds and sedges (Jay-
plants because of their faster growth, larger biomass pro-

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Riga Technical University. This is an open–access article distrib-
uted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
1
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

aweera, Witharana, 2011; Pathiraja, Perera, 2012; Sasi- below the 1000 mg/L. Prior to the experiment, the young
kala et al., 2010). Despite the potentials of using aquatic plants were selected for the study and they were stocked
macrophytes in phytoremmodiation of toxic contaminants in a tank which was filled with tap water for 7 days for
they are generally considered a nuisance for proper func- stabilization.
tion of water bodies and in most cases efforts are being The experimental setup was established using four
made to remove these plants from local water bodies due treatment groups of plastic tanks (40 cm upper, 30 cm
to their fast growth rate. This situation may enhance lower diameter and 30 cm depth) and they were filled
clogging effect in water intake system in irrigation tanks with 20 L of diluted raw textile effluent (three replicates
and destruction of biodiversity in water bodies and finally from each treatment group). Nearly equal weights of
effect of health of aquatic system. selected stabilized aquatic plants (300 g fresh weight)
Therefore, present study is aimed at evaluating the were transferred to prepared tanks containing diluted
phytoremediation potential of floating aquatic plants, textile effluent. One set of plastic tanks with diluted tex-
Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia mo- tile waste water and without plants were kept as a control.
lesta to treat textile waste water. The plants used in the Wastewater samples were collected and analysed after 14
phytoremediation technique must have a considerable day period. Water quality parameters such as tempera-
capacity of metal absorption, its accumulation and ture, COD, conductivity, TDS, pH, TS, TSS, total and
strength to decrease the treatment time (Mudgal et al., fecal coliform, nitrates, phosphates and heavy metals
2010). Therefore, it was also aimed at evaluating the were measured for wastewater in treatment and control
pollutant removal efficiency and to explore the mecha- tanks.
nisms by which the heavy metals are removed by the COD was measured by open reflux method (APHA,
selected floating macrophytes. 2005) and TDS was measured using a conductivity meter
(PC 700 Eutech Instrument) while pH was measured by
Materials and Methods
digital pH meter (Milwaukee SM 102 pH Meter). TS
Raw textile wastewater was freshly collected from a tex- were measured by the gravimetric method and TSS was
tile industry located in BOI zone, Biyagama, Sri Lanka. measured by subtracting the amount of TDS from the
Collected wastewater was immediately transported and amount of TS. Total and fecal coliform colony counts
was stored under cold conditions (4°C) until used for the were taken by the membrane filtration method (APHA,
experiment. The physical and chemical parameters of the 2005). Nitrates and phosphates were measured by a spec-
raw textile wastewater were measured suing standard trophotometer (Milton Roy Spectronic 21D), whereas
methods (APHA, 2005). According to the Bhavsar et al. heavy metals (Cd, Ni and Zn) in wastewater were meas-
(2012), aquatic plants are intolerant to organic loads more ured by using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Var-
than 1000 mg/L COD. The COD values recorded in the ian AA240FS). Percentage reductions of the effluent
raw wastewater were 1004 mg/L. Hence the raw effluent concentrations after 14 days were calculated using the
was diluted appropriately with freshwater to reduce COD following equation:

Mean concentrations of effluents among different Results


treatment groups after 14 days were compared using one-
Variation of pH
way ANOVA. Data were checked for normality and for
homogeneity of variance before the analysis. Turkey's The pH of wastewater in the control and treatment tanks
post hoc test was conducted for pair wise comparisons. varied between 6.5 and 7.7 during the experimental time
SPSS Statistical software was used for the analysis of period (Fig. 1). A slight reduction of pH values in waste-
data. water media treated with three plant species was recorded
BCF and TF of each plant variety were calculated in comparison to the control. The pH recorded in all me-
using the following equations: dia was within the range that is favourable for microbial
P action to degrade organic matter present in the wastewa-
BCF  (2) ter.
E
Reduction efficiencies of COD
where: BCF – bioconcentration factor; P – metal concen-
tration in plant tissues, mg/kg dry weight; E – metal con- The initial COD level of the wastewater was 980 mg/L.
centration in the wastewater, mg/L. The average COD levels in three treatment tanks and the
control tank after 14 days experimental period is repre-
As
TF  (3) sented in Figure 2. There was a significant (p < 0.05)
Ar reduction of the average COD values recorded in tanks
with plants and the control tanks after 14 days. However,
where: TF – transformation factor; As – amount of trace
there were no significant differences among the levels of
element, accumulated in the shoots, mg/kg dry weight; Ar
COD in tanks with three groups of plants. Over 74%
– amount of trace element, accumulated in the roots, reduction of COD was recorded in all treatment groups,
mg/kg dry weight.

2
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

whereas very low reduction percentage of 22.9% was


recorded for the control tank after 14 days.

Fig. 1. Variation of pH in treatment and control tanks during the


experimental period.
Reduction efficiencies of TS, TDS and TSS
The initial TS, TDS and TSS concentrations of the
wastewater were 690 mg/L, 509 mg/L and 181 mg/L
respectively. The average TS, TDS and TSS levels in
three treatment tanks and the control tank after 14 days
experimental period is represented in Figure 2. There was
a significant (p < 0.05) reduction of the average TS val-
ues recorded in tanks with plants and the control tanks
after 14 days. Treatment with E. crassipes indicated
highest TS reduction of (62.3%) in comparison to other
plants after 14 days.
A significant differences of TDS levels between
control and treatment tanks were also observed in control
and treatment tanks (Fig. 2). TDS was effectively reduced
by E. crassipes (59.3%) followed by P. stratiotes (52.1%)
and S. molesta (43.81%) from the initial levels. Figure 1
indicates the average TSS levels recorded in the treatment
tanks and in the control tanks. Treatment tanks with
E. crassipes indicated the highest TSS reduction (66.9%)
in comparison to other treatments and the control. How-
ever, there was no significant reduction of average TSS
recorded by P. stratiotes and S. molesta, instead they
showed higher levels of TSS than that of the control
tanks.
Reduction efficiencies of nitrates
The initial nitrate concentration of the wastewater was 4.4
mg/L. The average nitrate levels in three treatment tanks
and the control tank after 14 days experimental period is
represented in Figure 3.
There was a significant (p < 0.05) difference be- Fig. 2. COD, TDS, TS and TSS in the treatment and in the
tween the control and the tanks with P. crassipes. How- control tanks after 14 days (Mean ± SD). (a, b and c; different
ever, P. stratiose and S. molesta indicated significantly letters above the columns represent the statistically different
different nitrate levels in comparison to E. crassipes and groups (p < 0.05) and same letters represent statistically non-
the control tanks after 14 days of experimental period. significant groups).
The percentage reductions of nitrates in the treatment and
Reduction efficiencies of phosphates
in the control tanks during the 14 day experimental period
are indicated in Figure 3. A marked reduction of nitrate The initial phosphate level of the wastewater was 2.6
levels (63.6%, 78.9% and 79.5%) was recorded in the mg/L. The average phosphate levels in three treatment
tanks containing E. crassipes, P. stratiotes and S. molesta tanks and the control tank after 14 days experimental
respectively. period is represented in Figure 3. There was a significant
(p < 0.05) reduction of the average phosphate values

3
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

recorded in tanks with plants and the control tanks after the control tank after 14 days experimental period is rep-
14 days. The highest phosphate reduction percentage was resented in Figure 4. There was a significant (p < 0.05)
recorded for the tank containing E. crassipes (81.9%) difference in the average Ni values recorded in tanks with
followed by S. stratiotes (70.4%) and S. molesta (69.2%). plants and the control tanks after 14 days. The Ni concen-
tration in the wastewater reduced over the experimental
period. The highest reduction of Ni was recorded for S.
molesta (59.3%) followed by the E. crassipes and P.
stratiotes. The minimum reduction of Ni concentration
was recorded in the control.
Reduction efficiencies of Zn
The initial Zn concentration of the wastewater was 0.5
mg/L. The average Zn levels in three treatment tanks and
the control tank after 14 days experimental period is rep-
resented in Figure 4. There was a significant (p < 0.05)
difference in the average COD values recorded in tanks
with plants and the control tanks after 14 days. A marked
reduction of Zn in the treatment tanks were observed
during the experimental period. Almost 100% reduction
of Zn levels could be seen in tanks containing three plant
varieties.
0.25

Cd
0.2 a
Cd concentration, mg/L

0.15 b
b
b

0.1

0.05

0
E.crassipes P.stratiose S.molesta Control
0.3 a

0.25
Ni
Ni concentration, mg/L

0.2

b b
0.15
b

0.1

0.05

Fig. 3. Nitrate, phosphates and total coliforms variation in the


0
treatment and in the control tanks after 14 days (Mean ± SD). E.crassipes P.stratiose S.molesta Control

Reduction efficiencies of Cd 0.14

The initial Cd concentration of the wastewater was 0.19 0.12


Zn
mg/L. The average Cd levels in three treatment tanks and
Zn concentration, mg/L

0.1
the control tank after 14 days experimental period is rep-
resented in Figure 4. There was a significant (p < 0.05) 0.08
reduction of the average Cd values recorded in tanks with
0.06
plants and the control tanks after 14 days. Among the
three plant species tested, the highest Cd reduction was 0.04
recorded in the tank treated with P. stratiotes (47.4%)
0.02
whereas, E. crassipes and S. molesta indicated similar
reduction efficiencies (36.8%). 0
E.crassipes P.stratiose S.molesta Control
Reduction efficiencies of Ni
Fig. 4. Cd, Ni and Zn in the treatment and in the control tanks
The initial Ni concentration of the wastewater was 0.25 after 14 days (Mean±SD).
mg/L. The average Ni levels in three treatment tanks and

4
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

Reduction efficiencies of total coliform micro-organisms in the wastewater using available or-
ganic matter as a substrates (Mahmood et al., 2005) and
The initial Total coliform count of the wastewater was
may lead to degrade organic loads in the waste water and
112 CFU. The average Total coliform counts in three
subsequent reduction of COD of the media. Oxygen sup-
treatment tanks and the control tank after 14 days ex-
plied through the root zones of the aquatic plants are also
perimental period is represented in Figure 3. There was a
found to enhance the degradation of organic matter by
significant (p < 0.05) difference in the average Coliform
microorganisms (Sooknah 2000; Mahmood et al., 2005).
counts recorded in tanks with plants and the control tanks
Three tested aquatic plant species were effective in
after 14 days. Overall more than 89% reductions of total
reducing TS, TDS and TSS from wastewater. In the pre-
colonies were reported for three plant varieties.
sent study higher percentage reductions of TS, TDS and
BCFs and TFs for selected plant varieties TSS (62%, 61% and 67%) were recorded by E. crassipes
than the other two plant species employed. When looking
Metals recorded in roots and shoots of the selected plants
into the mechanisms by which plants reduce TS, TDS and
were indicated in Table 1.
TSS in wastewater, the plant roots acts as an inert solid
Table 1. Metal concentrations recorded in plant tissues (mg/kg matrix onto which micro-organisms are attached (Moyo,
dry weight) Mapira, 2012). Suspended solids in the media are also
entrapped by plant roots and form large particles which
Metal E. crassipes P. stratiose S. molesta enables their settling (Sooknah, 2000).This process is
Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot enhanced by microbes attached to the roots by aggregat-
Cd 0.2 0.4 0.46 0.2 0.4 0.13 ing smaller particles together to form larger particles
Ni 0.27 0.67 0.56 0.27 0.87 0.2 (Wolverton, 1989). Johnston (1993) also explained tur-
Zn 1.33 2.73 2.67 0.67 4 1.36 bidity reduction mechanisms triggered by E. crassipes by
their root hairs. Root hairs have electrical charges that
Bioconcentration Factor (BCFs) recorded for the attract opposite charges of colloidal particles such as
three aquatic plants for Cd, Ni and Zn were > 1. The suspended solids causing them to adhere on to roots
highest BCF for Cd was recorded for P. stratiotes (2.3), where they are slowly digested and assimilated by the
whereas highest values for Ni and Zn were recorded by plant and microorganisms (Johnston, 1993). TDS reduc-
S. molesta. TF value greater than 1 was recorded for tion was also evident in the present study and this may
E. crassipes, whereas less than 1 were recorded by S. have been attributed to the mechanisms such as phytode-
molesta and E. crassipes respectively (Table 2). gradation and uptake of dissolved ions by plants (Moyo,
Mapira, 2012). Dissolved solids in wastewater are also
Table 2. Measured BCFs and TFs for plant varieties at the end removed by way of oxidation by bacteria immobilized on
of 14 days the plant roots (Sooknah, 2000).
In addition plants also absorb nutrients/ions from
Metal E. crassipes P. stratiotes S. molesta
water and thus reducing TDS levels. The results of the
BCF TF BCF TF BCF TF present study also revealed that three aquatic plant varie-
Cd 1.9 2.0 2.3 0.4 0.8 0.3 ties are also effective in removing nitrates from the water.
Ni 2.5 2.5 2.2 0.5 3.1 0.2 Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential macro nutrient for
Zn 8.1 28.0 6.7 0.3 10.7 0.3 all the plants including aquatic macrophytes. The rate of
Discussion nitrate uptake by plants is influenced by factors such as:
growth rate, temperature and the density of plants
The results of the present study revealed that the three (Reddy, Tucker 1983; Sooknah, 2000). The present study
aquatic plant species P. stratiotes, E. crassipes and S. revealed higher nitrate reduction by P. stratiotes (78.9%)
molesta are effective in removing constituents in the tex- and S. molesta (79.5%) than E. crassipes and the control.
tile wastewater. A clear reduction of > 70% COD in tex- Mitchel, Tur, (1975) reported that mean relative growth
tile wastewater could be detected in treatment tanks rates of Salvinia molesta as high as 21.64% per day in
stocked with three plant varieties than that of the control terms of increase in number of leaves and 17.16% per day
tank. The results of the present study is consistent with in terms of dry weight increments. Doubling times under
the findings reported by many authors (Sidi, Tank, 2014; favourable growth conditions ranged from four to ten
Mahamood et al., 2005). Sidi, Tank (2014) reported days. Rivers (2002) states that P. stratiotes reproduces
81.6% reduction of COD in wastewater treated with E. vegetatively and by seed. Rapid vegetative reproduction
crassipes after 10 days. Mahamood et al., (2005) reported allows P. stratiotes to cover an entire lake, from shore to
40 – 70% COD reduction by the E. crassipes after 96 shore, with a dense mat of connected rosettes in a short
hours of exposure period. The high COD in the wastewa- period of time. It is possible that comparatively rapid
ter results due to the presence of high load of organic growth rates associated with P. stratoites and S. molesta
matter (Pundlik et al., 2013). The mechanisms by which may have contributed to the higher uptake of nitrates
the plants remove COD in the wastewater can be ex- from the solution and their assimilation into plant tissues.
plained in several ways. The presence of plants in waste This may have attributed for the reduction of nitrates
water may reduce the dissolved CO2 levels and increase from the wastewater treated by these plant species. Phos-
the dissolved oxygen in wastewater by photosynthetic phorus is also a limiting nutrient for many aquatic plants.
activities. This may enhance metabolic activity of aerobic

5
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

They take up phosphates through assimilation by roots, TFs recorded for P. stratiotes and S. molesta for selected
into the xylem and shoots (Lambers, Colmer, 2005; heavy metals were within the range of 0.23 – 0.49.
Sooknah, 2000). A higher phosphorus removal by E. Whereas measured TFs of E. crassipes for selected heavy
crassipes from wastewater was recorded in comparison to metals are within the range of 2 – 28. TFs greater than 1
other two species in the present study. P. stratiotes and S. recorded for E. crassipes indicate that E. crassipes effec-
molesta reduced 69% from the initial phosphate level and tively transfer the studied metals to shoots from their
it was lesser than that of E. crassipes and higher than the roots i.e the plants accumulates metals in the above
control. The inherent differences in macronutrient re- ground parts (shoot/leaves) than below ground parts
quirements for physiological processes may have attrib- (root/rhizosphere). TFs of P. stratiotes and S. molesta are
uted to the differences observed in the phosphorus ab- lower than 1 indicating that P. stratiotes and S. molesta
sorption by three plant varieties. Similarly increase of do not effectively transfer the studied metals to shoots
phosphate levels in wastewater after treatment with from their roots i.e the plants accumulates metals in the
macrophytes has also been reported (Akinbile, Yusoff, roots/rhizosphere than the shoot/leaves. The uptake abil-
2012). It was found that increase of phosphate concentra- ity of studied metals by roots of E. crassipes was in the
tion in the treatment containers attributed to the accumu- order of Ni Zn Cd. The uptake ability of metals by
lation of the plant detritus (Akinbile, Yusoff, 2012). Con-
roots of P.stratiotes was in the order of Zn Cd Ni.
versely reduction of phosphorus in wastewater was also
The uptake ability for the roots of S.molesta towards the
reported by many authors in other studies (Sooknah,
Wilkie, 2004) indicating effective nitrogen and phospho- studied elements was in the order of Ni Cd Zn. This
rus removal by E. crassipes. is consistent with the results reported by many authors
Microbiological analysis of water indicated that E that many aquatic plants accumulate metals in roots than
coli is not present in the wastewater samples, suggesting the other parts of plants (Satyakala, Jamil, 1992; Zarany-
the textile wastewater used for the present study was not ika, Ndapwadza 1995; Chandra, Kulshreshtha 2004).
exposed to fecal contamination or the water quality pa- These results further confirms the efficacy of E.
rameters were not suitable for their growth. A marked crassipes, P. stratiotes and S. molestain phytoremediation
reduction of total coliform counts were detected by three purposes. Phytoremediation comprises different strategies
plant varieties with the maximum reduction by P. stratio- used by plants to decontaminate soil and water; rhizofil-
tes. The mechanisms by which bacteria removal by tration, phytostabilization, phytodegradation, phytoex-
macrophytes have been explained by many authors. Bac- traction, and phytovolatilization (Bolan et al., 2011). The
teria are mostly trapped in the rhizosphere of the macro- mecahnisms by which the selected plant varieties remove
phytes with TSS, and some aquatic plants may secrete metals in the wastewater could be explained in terms of
chemical substances having bacteriocidal effects (Mandi, “rhizofiltration” which involves the removal of pollutants
1994; Zhenbim et al., 1993) and reduce bacterial popula- in the aqueous media by the plant root system
tions. Many authors suggest that protozoans associated (Dushenkov et al., 1995; Dushenkov, Kapulnik, 2000).
with roots of macrophytes may also reduce bacteria Conclusion
through predation as well (Ajayi, Ogunbayo, 2012).
These factors may have contributed to the marked reduc- From the findings of this study it could be concluded that
tion of Total coliform counts of the wastewater treated the E. crassipes, P. stratiotes and S. molesta are effective
with three plant varieties. in removing pollutants from the textile wastewater. More
The results of the present study also revealed that specifically they are more efficient in removing COD,
three plant varieties are effective in reducing heavy met- TDS, nutrients and metals from the wastewater. Several
als (Cd, Zn and Ni) from the wastewater media during 14 conventional methods are being used to treat contami-
days experimental period. Among these, Zn absorption nants in the textile wastewater. These include chemical
was more pronounced than the other two metals. BCF is precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis
the ratio of the metal concentration in the plant to the solvent extraction, chemical oxidation, electrolysis and
concentration of metal in the wastewater. TF is the ratio ultra filtration. However, most of these techniques are
of the metal concentration in the roots to the metal con- costly and some generate large volumes of sludge. Phy-
centration in the shoot at the end of the 14 days experi- toremediation by floating aquatic plants used in this study
ment. Both BCF and TF can be used to estimate a plant’s are well suited environmental protective technique for
potential for phytoremediation purpose (Yoon et al., removing heavy metals and other pollutants from textile
2006; Baker, 1981). BCFs values > 1 indicate that the wastewater. Findings of the present study indicated that
plant is an “accumulator” or ‘hyperaccumulator’, these plants uptake contaminants and stores in its bio-
whereas, values < 1 indicate the plant is an “excluder” mass. They also indicated high tolerance against con-
(Baker, 1981). TFs, > 1 indicate the plant is effective in taminants like heavy metals and are able to absorb large
the translocation of a metal from root to shoot tissue (Ma, quantities. This suggests that studied aquatic plants are a
et al., 2001). Calculated BCF of Cd, Ni and Zn for three promising alternative to the conventional clean-up meth-
aquatic plant varieties in the present study were greater ods, designed for the removal of metals and other pollut-
than 1. BCFs recorded for the three species suggests that ants in wastewater. Mostly these plants can be used in
selected aquatic plants E. crassipes, P. stratiotes and S. both secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment sys-
molesta are hyperaccumulators of studied heavy metals. tems, for the removal of contaminants or in integrated
secondary and tertiary treatment systems, where both

6
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

COD and nutrient removal is the goal. Moreover, these https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0303-9


plants can be collected and transplanting them into metal Dipu, S.; Kumar, A. A.; Thanga, V. S. G. 2011. Phytoremedia-
polluted waters where plants absorb and concentrate the tion of dairy effluent by constructed wetland technology.
metals in their roots and shoots. As they become satu- The Environmentalist, 31(3), 263–278.
rated with the metal contaminants, roots or whole plants https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-011-9331-z
can be harvested for disposal. Dushenkov, V.; Kumar, P.; Motto, H.; Raskin, I. 1995.
However, there are some limitations of the cultiva- Rhizofiltration: the use of plants to remove heavy metals
from aqueous streams. Environmental Science & Tech-
tion of S. molesta and E. crassipes for cleanup operations.
nology, 29(5), 1239–1245.
S. molesta and E. crassipes are considered as Invasive https://doi.org/10.1021/es00005a015
Alien species in Sri Lanka. Further, according to the Pre- Dushenkov, S.; Kapulnik, Y. 2000. Phytofilitration of metals.
vention of Mosquito Breeding Act No. 11 of 2007, In: Raskin, I.; Ensley, B. D. (Eds). Phytoremediation of
spreading of Pistia stratiotes is also prohibited within the Toxic Metals – Using Plants to Clean-up the Environ-
country. However, these plant species are highly abun- ment. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 89–106.
dant in natural aquatic systems within the country. There- Flathman, P. E.; Lanza, G. R. 1998. Phytoremediation: current
fore, naturally available plants can be harvested and can views on an emerging green technology. Journal of Soil
be used in phytoremediation operations. These acts would Contamination, 7(40, 415–432.
further aid in controlling spread of these plants in natural https://doi.org//10.1080/10588339891334438
water bodies. Jayaweera, M.; Witharana, A. 2011. Long term performance of
a constructed wetland planted with Typha angustifolia.
References Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Moratuwa.
Ajayi, T. O.; Ogunbayo, A. O. 2012. Achieving environmental
sustainability in wastewater treatment by phytoremedia- Johnston, C. A. 1993. Mechanism of water wetland water qual-
tion with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassips). Journal of ity interaction. In Moshiri, G. A. (Ed.). Constructed Wet-
Sustainable Development, 5(7), 80–90. land for Water Quality Improvement. Lewis Publishers:
https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n7p80 USA. 293–299.
Akinbile, C. O.; Yusoff, S. M. 2012. Assessing water hyacinth Kulkarni, B. V.; Ranade, S. V.; Wasif, A. I. 2007. Phytoreme-
(Eichhornia crassipes) and lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) ef- diation of textile process effluent by using water hyacinth
fectiveness in aquaculture waste water treatment. Interna- – A polishing treatment. Journal of Industrial Pollution
tional Journal of Phytoremediation, 14(3), 201–211. Control, 23(1), 97-101.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.587482 Lambers, H.; Colmer, T. D. 2005. Root Physiology from Gene
Anjana, S.; Thanga, V. S. G. 2011. Phytoremediation of Syn- to Function. Springer: The Netherlands.
thetic Textile Dyes. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Bio- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0964-x
technology and Environmental Sciences, 13(1), 30–39. Ma, L. Q.; Komar, K. M.; Tu, C.; Zhang, W.; Cai, Y.; Kennelly,
APHA 2005. Standard Methods, 21st Edition. Washington: E. D. 2001. A fern that hyperaccumulators arsenic. Na-
American Public Health Association. ture, 409, 579. https://doi.org/10.1038/35054664
Mahmood Q, Zheng P, Siddiqi MR, Islam E ul, Azim MR,
Baker, A. J. M. 1981. Accumulators and excluder: strategies in
Hayat Y. 2005. Anatomical studies on water hyacinth
response of plants to heavy metals. Journal of Plant Nu-
(Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) under the influence
trition, 3(1-4), 643–654.
of textile wastewater. Journal of Zhejiang University Sci-
https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168109362867
ence B, 6(10), 991–998.
Bhavsar, S. R.; Pujari, V. R.; Diwan, V. V. 2012. Potential of
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.B0991
Phytoremediation for dairy wastewater treatment. IOSR
Mandi, L. 1994. Marrakesh wastewater purification experiment
Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-
using vascular aquatic plants Eichhornia crassipes and
JMCE), 16–23.
Lemna gibba. Water Science and Technololgy, 29(4),
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosrjmce/papers/sicete(civil)-
283–287. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0210
volume6/61.pdf
Mohamad, P. M. B. E. 2008. Removal of cadmium from aque-
Bolan, N. S.; Park, J. H.; Robinson, B.; Naidu, R.; Huh, K. Y. ous solution by dried water hyacinth (Eichhornia
2011. Phytostabilization: a green approach to contami- crassipes). B. E. Thesis, Chemical and Natural Resources
nant. Advances in Agronomy, 112, 145–204. Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385538-1.00004-4
Moyo, P.; Mapira, J. 2012. Bioremediation with the water hya-
Carvalho, K. M.; Martin, D. F. 2001. Removal of aqueous sele- cinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a panacea for river pollution
nium by four aquatic plants. Journal of Aquatic Plant in the city of Masvingo (Zimbabwe). Journal of Sustain-
Management, 39, 33–36. able Development in Africa, 14(6), 115–131.
Chandra, P.; Kulshreshtha, K. 2004. Chromium accumulation Mudgal, V.; Madaan, N.; Mudgal, A. 2010. Heavy metals in
and toxicity in aquatic vascular plants. The Botanical Re- plants: phtyremediation: Plants used to remediate heavy
view, 70(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006- 8101 metal pollution. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North
Dhir, B.; Sharmila, P.; Saradhi, P. P. 2009. Potential of aquatic America, 1(1), 40–46.
macrophytes for removing contaminants from the envi- Pathiraja, P. M. G.; Perera N. P. T. 2012. Pilot scale study: use
ronment – Critical Review. Environmental Science and of subsurface flow constructed wetlands for domestic
Technology, 39(9), 754–781. wastewater treatment in Sri Lanka. ICSBE-2012: Interna-
https://doi.org//10.1080/10643380801977776 tional Conference on Sustainable Built Environment.
Dhote, S.; Dixit, S. 2009. Water quality improvement through Kandy, Sri Lanka
macrophytes – a review. Environmental Monitoring and
Assessment, 152, 149–153.

7
Journal of Water Security, 2018, Vol. 4, jws2018001

Pivetz, B. E. 2001. Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and gested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecological En-
ground water at hazardous sites. Ground Water Issue, gineering, 22, 27–42.
EPA/540/S-01/500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.01.004
Pundik, W.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Varsadia, M. 2013. Removal of Sukumaran, D. 2013. Phytoremediation of heavy metals from
dye effluent by different aquatic plants in Kadodara (Dst. industrial effluent using constructed wetland technology.
Surat) region by Rhizofiltration technique. Journal of Sci- Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 1(5), 92-
entific Research in Pharmacy, 2(2), 2277–9469. 97. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-1-5-4
Reddy, K. R.; Tucker, J. C. 1983. Productivity and nutrient Toprak, T.; Anis, P. 2017. Textile industry environmental ef-
uptake of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes I. Effect fects and approaching cleaner production and
of nitrogen source. Economic Botany, 37(2), 237–247. sustainablility: an overview. Journal of Textile Engineer-
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858790 ing and Fashion Technology, 2(4), 00066.
Rivers, L. 2002. Water Lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). Gainsville, https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2017.02.00066
USA. University of Florida and Sea Grant. Vestena, S.; Cambraia, J.; Olivama, M. A.; Oliveira, J. A. 2007.
Satyakala, G.; Jamil, K. 1992. Chromium-induced biochemical Cadmium accumulation by water hyacinth and salvinia
changes in Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) solms and Pistia under different sulfur concentrations. Journal of Brazilian
stratiotes L. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination Society Ecotoxicology, 2(3), 269–274.
Toxicology, 48(6), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.5132/jbse.2007.03.010
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201155 Wolverton, B. C. 1989. Aquatic plant/microbial filters for treat-
Sasikala, S.; Tanaka, N.; Jinadasa, K. B. S. N.; Mowjood, M. I. ing septic tank effluent. In: Hammer D. A. (Ed.). Con-
M. 2010. Comparision study of pulsing and continuous structed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Municipal
flow for improving effluent water quality and plant Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers: USA. 173–
growth of a constructed wetland to treat domestic waste- 178.
water. Tropical Agricultural Research, 21(2), 147–1569. Yoon, J.; Cao, X; Zhou, Q.; Ma, L. Q. 2006. Accumulation of
https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i2.2596 Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contami-
Sidi, S.; Tank, S. 2014. To study the pollution load reduction nated Florida site. Science of the Total Environment,
potential of Eichhornia Crassipes (Water Hyacinth) in the 368(2–3), 456–464.
Kadodara Khadi, Surat. International Journal for Scien- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.016
tific Research and Development, 1(11), 2468–2471. Zaranyika, M. F.; Ndapwadza, T. 1995. Uptake of Ni, Zn, Fe,
Singh, D.; Tiwari, A.; Gupta, R. 2012. Phytoremediation of lead Co, Cr, Pb, Cu and Cd by water hyacinth (Eichhornia
from wastewater using aquatic plants. Journal of Agricul- crassipes) in Mukuvsi and rivers, Zimbabwe. Journal of
ture Technology, 8(1), 1–11. Environmental Science and Health Assessment, 30(1),
Sooknah, H. 2000. A review of the mechanisms of pollutant 1157–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529509376193
removal in water hyacinth systems. Science and Technol- Zhenbim, W.; Yicheng, X.; Jiaqi, D.; Qijun, Z.; Facui, Z.; Xi-
ogy – Research Journal, 6, 49–57. tao, Ch. 1993. Studies on wastewater treatment by means
Sooknah, R. D.; Wilkie, A. C. 2004. Nutrient removal by float- of integrated biological pond system: design and function
ing aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically di- of macrophytes. Water Science and Technology, 27(1),
97–105.

You might also like