Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mrs A Kanthamani Case
Mrs A Kanthamani Case
Mrs A Kanthamani Case
REPORTABLE
VERSUS
JUDGMENT
e
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1
Page 1
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
appellant.
b
2
Page 2
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
3
Page 3
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
these clauses.
4
Page 4
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
6
Page 6
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
Rs.1,47,200/-.
7
Page 7
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
8
Page 8
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
9
Page 9
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
merited dismissal.
e
20) In reply, learned counsel for the respondent
10
Page 10
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
11
Page 11
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
controversy. c
12
Page 12
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
following principle:
(b)…………………..
(c) who fails to aver and prove that he has
performed or has always been ready and
willing to perform the essential terms of the b
contract which are to be performed by him,
other than terms the performance of which
has been prevented or waived by the
defendant.
14
Page 14
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
15
Page 15
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
are apposite:
b
“21…………..Their Lordships agree with
this conclusion and the grounds on which it
was based. It is true that the plaintiff 1
stated that he was buying for himself, that he
had not sufficient ready money to meet the
price and that no definite arrangements had c
been made for finding it at the time of
repudiation. But in order to prove himself
ready and willing a purchaser has not
necessarily to produce the money or to vouch
a concluded scheme for financing the
transaction. The question is one of fact, and d
in the present case the Appellate Court had
ample material on which to found the view it
reached. Their Lordships would only add in
this connection that they fully concur with
Chagla A.C.J. when he says:
e
"In my opinion, on the evidence
already on record it was
sufficient for the court to come
to the conclusion ' that plaintiff
1 was ready and willing to
perform his part of the contract.
It was not necessary for him to ' f
work out actual figures and
satisfy the court what specific
amount a bank would have
advanced on the mortgage of his
property and the pledge of these
shares. I do not think that any g
jury--if the matter was left to
the jury in England--would have
come to the conclusion that a
man, " in the position in which
the plaintiff was, was not ready
and willing to pay the purchase
price of the shares which he had h
bought from defendants 1 and
2."
16
Page 16
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
words:
17
Page 17
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
or/and law? f
18
Page 18
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
19
Page 19
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
20
Page 20
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
21
Page 21
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
the defendant.
h
44) In our view, none of these findings could be
22
Page 22
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
conclusion.
liable to be dismissed.
23
Page 23
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
rightly recorded. f
24
Page 24
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
….……..................................J. d
[ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE]
New Delhi;
March 6, 2017
25
Page 25
This is a True Court Copy™ of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
MANU/SC/0234/2017 : Downloaded from www.manupatra.com
Printed on : 30 Apr 2024 Printed for : Prashant Kumar Kumar
TM
This is a True Court Copy of the judgment as appearing on the Court website.
Publisher has only added the Page para for convenience in referencing.