Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wang 2015
Wang 2015
com
Cobalt sulfide (CoS2) is considered one of the most promising alternative anode
materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by virtue of its
remarkable electrical conductivity, high theoretical capacity, and low cost. However,
it suffers from a poor cycling stability and low rate capability because of its volume
expansion and dissolution of the polysulfide intermediates in the organic electrolytes
during the battery charge/discharge process. In this study, a novel porous carbon/CoS2
composite is prepared by using nano metal–organic framework (MOF) templates for
high-preformance LIBs. The as-made ultrasmall CoS2 (15 nm) nanoparticles in N-rich
carbon exhibit promising lithium storage properties with negligible loss of capacity at
high charge/discharge rate. At a current density of 100 mA g−1, a capacity of 560 mA
h g−1 is maintained after 50 cycles. Even at a current density as high as 2500 mA g−1, a
reversible capacity of 410 mA h g−1 is obtained. The excellent and highly stable battery
performance should be attributed to the synergism of the ultrasmall CoS2 particles
and the thin N-rich porous carbon shells derieved from nanosized MOF precusors.
1. Introduction
sulfide (CoS2) has attracted much attention due to its remark-
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are creating great changes in able electrical conductivity and high theoretical capacity.[3]
modern life, and have been widely used in portable electronic However, its practical application suffers from several prob-
devices due to their high energy density and long cycle life. lems. For example, the pulverization problem caused by the
However, their performance is still far from meeting the huge volume change during charge/discharge process could
requirements of the mass, growing electric vehicles’ market.[1] cause a rapid capacity fading during cycling. This problem is
Graphite is the prevailing commercial anode material and further aggravated by the dissolution of the polysulfide inter-
has nearly approached its theoretical limit (372 mA h g−1).[2] mediates in the organic electrolytes. Moreover, the poor rate
Among the available alternative anode materials, cobalt performance of CoS2 also limits its practical application.
So far, considerable efforts have been devoted for better
cycling stability and higher rate performance. Previous works
Q. Wang, Prof. R. Zou, W. Xia, J. Ma, B. Qiu, have shown that reducing the particle size of the anode mate-
A. Mahmood, R. Zhao, Y. Yang, Prof. D. Xia rial into nano-range could weaken the mechanical stress
Department of Materials Science and Engineering generated during the charge/discharge process, and conse-
College of Engineering
quently inhibit the pulverization problem.[4] In addition,
Peking University
Beijing 100871, China the short diffusion path of lithium ions in the nanoparticles
E-mail: rzou@pku.edu.cn would be helpful to the rate performance. Besides reducing
Prof. Q. Xu the particle size, using porous carbons[5] or graphene[6] as a
National Institute of Advanced Industrial host structure for the CoS2 could offer spare space for the
Science and Technology (AIST) volume expansion and prevent the pulverization effectively.
Ikeda, Osaka 563-8577, Japan More importantly, the host structure could adsorb and trap
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579 the polysulfide intermediates, consequently help to extend
small 2015, © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.small-journal.com 1
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
full papers
www.MaterialsViews.com
2 www.small-journal.com © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim small 2015,
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
www.MaterialsViews.com
small 2015, © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.small-journal.com 3
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
full papers
www.MaterialsViews.com
4 www.small-journal.com © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim small 2015,
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
www.MaterialsViews.com
Figure 3. View of a) voltage profile, b) cyclic voltammograms, c) cycle-life performance at 100 and 2500 mA g−1, and d) charge/discharge capacity
at various current densities of NC/CoS2-650.
N 1s XPS spectrum was collected to obtain insight into the the morphology of the carbon matrix, the nitrogen content
nitrogen species (Figure S11, Supporting Information). Com- of NC/CoS2-1000 decreases sharply compared with NC/
paring the cycling performance of NC/CoS2-650 and BC/ CoS2-650 (Table S1, Supporting Information), due to the loss
CoS2-650 at 500 mA g−1 between 0.1 and 3.0 V (Figure 5a), of pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen atoms (Figure S12, Sup-
similar stabilities could be obtained, but the average capacity porting Information). As shown in Figure 5a, the capacity
of BC/CoS2-650 is lower than that of NC/CoS2-650. Given of NC/CoS2-1000 falls dramatically after the initial several
that BC/CoS2-650 has the similar ultrasmall CoS2 particles, cycles. Given that NC/CoS2 has similar hierarchical porosity
the difference should be originated from the particle size to NC/CoS2-650 (Figure S10 inset, Supporting Information),
and porous structure of the carbon matrix. The thick carbon the larger particle size of CoS2 and lower nitrogen content
matrix of BC/CoS2-650 may hinder the transfer of lithium in NC/CoS2-1000 should be the vital reasons for the worse
ions into its core side, leading to insufficient utilization of all performance. The huge volume change of large CoS2 par-
the CoS2 nanoparticles in the composite. According to the ticles may cause the protective carbon matrix to crack and
pore size distribution results (Figure S10 inset, Supporting fracture.[22] Without the protection, some small pieces from
Information), the lack of larger mesopores in BC/CoS2-650 the decomposed large CoS2 particles flee into the electrolyte,
will aggravate the condition, thus resulting in the low specific resulting in “dead materials.” Furthermore, the low content
capacity. of nitrogen may weaken the adsorption ability of the carbon
Another C/CoS2 composite with larger CoS2 particles host toward the polysulfide.[23] Figure 5b shows the Nyquist
was prepared by increasing the carbonization temperature plots for NC/CoS2-650 and NC/CoS2-1000. The impedance
to 1000 °C (denoted as NC/CoS2-1000). During the high associated with the charge transfer resistance in NC/CoS2-
temperature carbonization process at 1000 °C, the cobalt 1000 is much lower than that in NC/CoS2-650, leading to
particles aggregated and formed to large particles of CoS2 the conclusion that the battery performance mainly depends
without uniform shape in the final C/CoS2 composite on the particle size of CoS2 and the nitrogen content of the
(Figure S8c,d, Supporting Information). Moreover, the mor- carbon matrix, as well as the thickness of the carbon shell.
phology of the rhombic dodecahedron carbon matrix was Consequently, the comparisons have illustrated the superi-
also changed by the high temperature processing. Besides ority of the ideal nanostructure of NC/CoS2-650.
small 2015, © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.small-journal.com 5
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
full papers
www.MaterialsViews.com
6 www.small-journal.com © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim small 2015,
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579
www.MaterialsViews.com
small 2015, © 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.small-journal.com 7
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403579