Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LINCOLN TowardCriticalHauntology 2015
LINCOLN TowardCriticalHauntology 2015
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Comparative Studies in Society and History
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Comparative Studies in Society and History 20 15;57(1): 191-220.
0010-4175/14 © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2014
doi : 1 0. 1 0 1 7/SOO 1 04 1 75 1 4000644
BRUCE LINCOLN
University of Chicago
A specter is haunting the academy: the figure of the ghostly, the phantasmic,
and the unquiet dead. Over the last fifteen years, a large and rapidly growing
number of works in diverse disciplines - sociology,1 psychoanalysis,2 literary
criticism,3 folklore,4 cultural studies,5 postcolonial studies,6 race and gender
studies,7 geography,8 media studies, and communication and rhetoric9 - have
sought to reinterpret stories of haunting as the return of traumatic memory.
Within such work, ghosts manifest not as terrifying revenants, but as
welcome, if disquieting spurs to consciousness and calls for political action.
Most immediately, this interdisciplinary interest in ghosts was sparked by
Jacques Derrida's Specters of Marx (1993), a curious book that combines a pro-
fession of faith (i.e., the messianic spirit of Marxism still holds promise,
191
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
192 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
deserves fidelity, and terrifies the world's rulers, even after the fall of Mar
states and orthodoxies); an audacious claim of successorship (deconstructio
the radicalization of Marx's messianism, as well as his critical spirit); and a
prising observation (spirits, spooks, and haunting loom large in Marx's
ings).10 In the course of his discussion, Derrida playfully introduced the
"hauntology" - in punning contrast to a more rigid, concrete, and self-se
ontology - to describe a concern with apparitions, visions, and representa
that mediate the sensuous and the non-sensuous, visibility and invisibility, p
ence and absence, reality and not-yet-reality, being and non-being. The t
has proved useful, as have some of Derrida's observations on spectral phen
ena, although he based the great majority of his ideas concerning ghosts p
on a single literary source: Act I of Shakespeare's Hamlet. In this essay,
suggest a typology of hauntings to clarify the types and uses of ghosts
loom large in current scholarship, suggesting the need for a "critical hau
ogy." We begin with a review of the theoretical literature that has been pa
ularly influential. We then introduce a distinction between what we ter
primary and secondary haunting via case studies in Vietnam, where haunt
has ample local precedent and bears political, moral, and religious signif
cance.11 Finally, we explore the interaction between the two types of hau
at the site of a civilian massacre in South Vietnam, a village troubled by
afterlife of grievous mass death. Appendix I provides our English transla
of a media source on these latter events.
Prominent among the earlier works that helped shape the new hauntology
are Freud's essays on mourning and melancholia (1917), the uncanny (1919),
and his broader emphasis on the return of the repressed; Marx's theory of alien-
ation and the phantasmatic way human labor reappears in commodities and
surplus value (1977 [1867]); Durkheim's view of spiritual beings as collective
representations (1995 [1912]); Mauss' interest in the spirit of the gift (1967
[1925]) and the social nature of mourning rituals (1921); and Maurice Halb-
wachs's attention to collective memory (1992 [1925]). For all these theoreti-
cians, and others as well, the borderland between corporeal existence and
some other dimension (equally real but less material) has proven an irresistible,
if elusive, arena for speculation.
These lines of theory converge in Walter Benjamin's seminal essay "On
the Concept of History" (2003 [1940]), which integrated most of the works
just cited, made them speak to the crisis of fascism's advance, and in doing
so developed a position that continues to resonate well beyond that immediate
10 Derrida 1994. An earlier version of this text was first presented as the keynote address at a
1993 conference on the theme "Whither Marxism?"
Hauntological language has also crept into American language reterencing the conîlict in
Vietnam. For example, in 2002, the U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam described the legacy of Agent
Orange as the last "significant ghost" remaining in the postwar period (see Fox 2007).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 1 93
III: The chronicler who narrates events without distinguishing between majo
minor ones acts in accord with the following truth: nothing that has ever hap
should be regarded as lost to history... (2003 [1940]: 390).
V: The true image of the past flits by. The past can be seized only as an image
flashes up at the moment of its recognizability, and is never seen again... (ibid.).
VI: Articulating the past historically does not mean recognizing it "the way it r
was." It means appropriating a memory as it flashes up in a moment of danger....
only historian capable of fanning the spark of hope in the past is the one who is f
convinced that even the dead will not be safe from the enemy if he is victorious. And
enemy has never ceased to be victorious (ibid.: 391, his emphasis).
Although practitioners of the new hauntology generally take their lead from
essay of Benjamin's, they depart from it in several ways. Most obviousl
nowhere did Benjamin speak directly of ghosts, phantoms, or haunting, o
of remembrance, the past , the dead , and - on one occasion - the image of
slaved ancestors ,13 These authors' citations of Benjamin therefore draw rh
ical power from their literalization of a figure whose presence in the the
only implicit, although they do take recourse to another essay in which B
min made brief mention of "ghostly signals."14 Recoding Benjamin's conc
for the fate of the dead and the way they are remembered (or forgotten)
interest in spectral phenomena extends Benjamin's language in the directi
metaphor and expands his argument toward metaphysics. Although the im
cations of his essay are far-reaching and its intentions are explicitly mess
Benjamin was most immediately concerned with the politics and morali
12 Benjamin's notion of the modern "phantasmagoria" is also relevant, on which see Britz
1999.
"Remembrance" figures in Addendum B of the essay, "the past" in theses II, III, IV, V, VI
XIV, XVI, and XVII; "the dead," in theses VI, IX; "the image of enslaved ancestors" in Thesis
The closest Benjamin comes to a description of a haunting, ghostly presence comes in Th
"Doesn't a breath of the air that pervaded earlier days caress us as well? In the voices we
isn't there an echo of now silent ones? Don't the women we court have sisters they no longe
ognize? If so, there is a secret agreement between past generations and the present one. Th
coming was expected on earth" (2003 f 19401: 390).
14 Benjamin 1999 [1929]: 211. Gordon 2008 [1997] devotes considerable attention to this
of Benjamin's in her closing chapter, where she tends to equate the "ghostly signals" he me
just once, in passing, with his more fully developed idea of "profane illumination."
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
194 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY I95
17 See Langford 2013: 15: "Whereas for Gordon, ghosts are literary traces of slavery, para
itary terror, or gendered violence, in this book ghosts are ethnographic figures, slamming do
cracking branches, causing illness, and demanding clothes and cigarettes."
These include Cha 1982; Keller 2002; and Jeong-mo 1998.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
196 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
ii
Initiatives in the new hauntology thus typically base themselves on a scant and
idiosyncratic evidentiary foundation, developing the trope of haunting without
considering how ghosts are theorized by those who take them as something
other than metaphor. Here, the standard English terminology provides a conve-
nient, if arbitrary, starting point for further discussion. Thus, as indicated by
their etymologies, the terms ghost 19 and spirit10 both denote the intangible sub-
stance - moving air in the form of breath - that vivifies the body during life,
but separates from it at death, at which moment bodily matter turns into a
corpse, while the essential life-force persists as disembodied "spirit."
Most religions theorize spiritual existence as no less real than the material,
albeit less tangible, concrete, and mundane. It is regularly posited, however,
that some unfortunate spirits fail to complete their transit to disincarnate post-
mortem existence. As a result, they are caught in a nebulous liminal state, main-
taining some shred of materiality that renders them partially perceptible (e.g.,
audible but not visible; visible but not tangible; visible only to some; visible
but transparent; visible to the eye, but not captured on mirrors or film) and
endows them with the capacity to interact with select persons in the world
they imperfectly departed. This is to say that ghosts are commonly theorized
as possessing an ontological status that is ambiguous, even contradictory, min-
imally - but emphatically - substantial and real. To the extent that hauntology
denies ghosts ontologie status and recodes the unquiet dead as persisting in
texts, memory, and uneasy silences rather than spirit, it locates them inside
the consciousness of those they "visit," rather than on the borders of the phys-
ical and metaphysical, thereby rationalizing, simplifying, and perhaps also dis-
torting aspects of the phenomena it claims as its object of study.
19 The word "ghost" is derived from Old English gãst, which denotes 1. the breath (in which
sense, it was used to translate Latin halitus and spiramen ); and 2. the spirit, soul, ghost (in
which sense it was used to translate Latin spiritus, animus, and anima); Bosworth and Toller
1966: 362. Ultimately, this and related nouns in West Germanic languages (Old Saxon gēst , Old
Frisian gãst , Old High German geist) are built on a proto-Germanic verbal root *ghois~, *gheis-
that describes the ability to inspire fear, as in Gothic usgaisjan, usgeisnan , "to terrify," and Old
Norse geisa, "to rage" (compare with the English "ghastly"). See further, Onions 1996: 396;
Feist 1939: 531-32; and Pokorny 1959: 427.
The English word "spirit" is derived from Latin spiritus , which denotes 1. breathing; 2. the
breath of a god, inspiration; 3. the breath of life, life. The Latin noun is formed from the verb
spiro , spirare , "to breathe" (Lewis and Short 1962: 1743; Ernout and Meillet 1951: 1134; Walde
and Hofmann 1972, 2: 575-76). See also Onions (1996: 854-55), which gives the following def-
initions: "A. breath of life; B. vital principle; C. intelligent incorporeal being; D. vital power; E.
liquid of the nature of an essence."
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY I97
21 Inter alia , Lopatin 1960; Thomas 2000; Pons 2002; Cros and Bonhomme 2008; Fra
and Blanes and Espirito Santo 2013.
See, inter alia , LaFleur 1989; Freed and Freed 1993; Klima 2002; DeCaroli 2004; Eb
2006; Cuevas and Stone 2007; Holt 2007; 2012; Cuevas 2008; Delaplace 2009; Feuchtwa
Endres and Lauser 2011; Davis 2012; Langford 2013; and Buyandelger 2013.
In Vietnamese, ghosts are commonly referred to as con ma. The Sino- Vietnamese t
hôn and cô hôn dã quý reference "wandering souls," or ghosts of those who died ho
alone; the term hon, whose primary meaning is "soul" or "spirit," may also reference a
Though in Vietnam "supernatural" beliefs are genetically associated with poor, rura
cated, and female persons, formally educated persons with official positions also enjoy r
stories of the supernatural. During fieldwork in Hà Noi in 2009-2010, a scientist friend c
Martha Lincoln with her accounts of a reputedly omniscient Nha Trang fortuneteller as we s
laboratory. Equally materially minded friends liked to share stories of body-finding ge
family members who experienced ghostly possession (bi ma nhâp vào ), America
undead grandmothers, and other personifications of the uncanny.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
igS LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
Within a few weeks of moving to Hanoi, Sam's girlfriend told him about something of
which he was unaware: Sam talked in his sleep and shook so violently that the entire bed
25 The question of whether ghosts are understood to retain some small degree of materiality
admits no easy resolution insofar as ghosts mediate and corrode the conventional binary opposition
of life and death, being and non-being, matter and spirit.
Malarney 2001: 59; Kwon 2008: 85-90; Gustafsson 2009: 55-64. An account ot how these
categories functioned in Vietnam prior to the Second Indochina War can be found in Cadière ( 1 955-
1957: 3: 60-65). Malarney (2007) engages a separate type of ancestral figure - war martyrs and
other heroes of the state - in Vietnam's socialist and post-reform periods.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY I99
moved. The woman was terrified, primarily because the violent and enraged stat
he made during these episodes were in Vietnamese. Sam had a rudimentary kno
of Vietnamese, certainly good enough to communicate with his girlfriend and
workers, but the fluency of his speech at night was astounding. Sam asked her
him, which she did on several occasions. The invective heard flowing from
mouth was that of a native Vietnamese, utterly disturbing in its bald rage. "Gi
me, give it to me, give it to me," he screamed in Vietnamese. "Motherfuck
give it to me or I will eat your mother's soul."
Back in 1968, as he was being flown out of Khe Sanh by helicopter, one of
friends put into his hand the blood-spattered identity card of a Vietcong fighte
been killed inside the lines of the American base. Such markers of identification were
supposed to be turned over to the authorities so they could keep accurate count of
enemy casualties, but sometimes they were kept by U.S. soldiers as souvenirs. Sam
kept it as a reminder of his time in Vietnam, even bringing it with him when he
moved there years later. It was clear to Sam and his girlfriend that the problems he'd
been having at night came from that dead Vietcong: he wanted his papers back and
would continue to torment Sam until he got them (Gustafsson 2009: 47-48).
"He is Hoc Van Nguyen. I see he is running at the wire at the big American Base. Others
are running with him and shouting. He is shooting, always shooting. He falls over some-
thing. There is a loud explosion - so loud! - and then he is dead. His throat is open and
he sees his own blood pouring. An American comes and pulls him roughly to another
place with many other killed Vietnamese. He goes through his pockets and takes
what is there. He [Hoc] is put in a hole with the others and covered with a bulldozer."
[The diviner] relayed these details very slowly, as if they pained her to do so. Sam was
fascinated and held the identity card he was given in 1968 just before he was flown out
of Vietnam. The name on the card had been scratched out - only the number remained
and place of birth. "Is that him?" he asked, holding the card out in front of her covered
face. "Yes," she replied. "He is very angry" (ibid.: 90).
27 Thus, for instance, the angry ghosts {con ma) who cause spirit possession regularly exhibit
"bizarre behaviors, such as the screaming of obscenities, jerky body movements, nonsensical
speech" (Malarney 2002: 96).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
200 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
in
Although the Vietnamese examples share some features with the mat
treated in the hauntological literature, the two are sufficiently differe
we distinguish between two ideal-typical scenarios that we term prima
secondary haunting. We note five crucial differences. First, individuals af
by primary haunting recognize the reality and autonomy of metaphysi
ties (i.e., those theorized as spiritual and minimally material beings) in r
ly uncritical and unselfconscious fashion. Secondary haunting recogn
"entities" in the sedimented textual residues of horrific historic events or
natively, as tropes for collective intrapsychic states and experiences, in
trauma, grief, regret, repression, guilt, and a sense of responsibility f
wrongs suffered by victims whose memory pains - or ought to pain
survivors.
Second, the ghostly apparitions of primary haunting are narrow an
cific in whom they seek out and address. Typically, they confront eith
who caused their violent and untimely death, close relatives who have
seen to their burial and funerary honors, or strangers who happen to l
the place where their bodies have been provisionally and unsatisf
buried.29 Secondary haunting involves a much wider set of unquiet s
(slaves, desaparecidos , yanggongjus , or Holocaust victims, for examp
engages a much wider audience whose relation to the deceased is less in
and who bear less personal responsibility for wrongs committed and/or t
of rectification.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 201
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
202 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
iv
Hauntologists did not invent the project of secondary haunting, which als
flourishes in other contexts. Consider an example from the Vietnamese di
spora, a speech that anthropologist Nguyên-võ Thu-huong recently delive
on the anniversary of the fall of Sài Gòn.
The dead could be my grandfather, who was tortured and tossed outside to die whimp
ing for water within 48 hours of his arrest by the French Security Police in 1946 at
beginning of the First Indochina War. The dead could be your grandfather, who die
starved, ill, or stuffed down a well, in a re-education camp in the years after 1975
the end of the Second Indochina War, also known as the Vietnam War. The d
could be your aunt, who was raped and thrown overboard that rickety boat trying
cross the Eastern Sea in the decades of the 1980s and 1990s, following the Third Ind
china War. (...)
To those whose business it is to foreclose on the past for [the sake of] national unity,
for the global world and its economy, may they live under that curse uttered by Oedipus,
Antigone's father. When the ruler of Thebes asks him to return from exile to die and be
buried in the soil of his country, blessing it, Oedipus vengefully swears: "My ghost to
haunt thy country without end."
I want to speak that curse on this day of all days, may the dead "for ever" haunt coun-
tries - the U.S. or Vietnam, so that their history will be "for ever" disturbed, unclosed.
And I want to speak that curse to us all, so that we may remain open to the straying
fragments from the past. May we be haunted, without end (2014).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 203
(figure l).30 This episode was only one among a number of Khmer Rouge as-
saults on civilians during Vietnam-Cambodia border conflicts between 1975
and 1979.31 It was, however, far the largest.
Although Vietnamese sources typically treat the Ba Chúc massacre as a
senseless atrocity, historic circumstances suggest that to imagine it as inexpli-
cable is disingenuous. Indeed, this episode was framed by conflicts at nested
scales, from the intra-national to the international.32 As Morris (1999)
argues, hostilities between Vietnam and Cambodia were partially a proxy for
Sino-Soviet struggles in Asia. North Vietnam's "tilt" towards the Soviets
versus Cambodia's alliance with China and, tacitly, the United States
30 According to at least one account in the Vietnamese press, three people, not two, survived the
massacre (Thanh Niên 2010).
In 1977 and 1978, Khmer Rouge forces also carried out attacks on Vietnamese villages and
towns in An Giang, Dông Tháp, and Tây Ninh provinces (O'Dowd 2007: 35-36).
More broadly on the Cambodian- Vietnamese conflict, see Elliot 1981; Chanda 1986;
Nguyen-võ Thu-Huomg 1992; Morris 1999; and Westad and Quinn-Judge 2006.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
204 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
(Kiernan 2002: 488) raised the stakes between the two communist regim
did a long history of border conflicts, racialized ressentiment, and mutu
trust. The border and the Cambodian countryside had also served as an
clared front of the Second Indochina War from the late 1960s, when "bo
in the Vietnam conflict [treated] Cambodia as a theatre of their ground
war" (ibid.: 485). Both sides carried out multiple campaigns of ethnic cl
against their respective minority populations, causing mass exodus by r
and setting precedent for military targeting of civilians.33
In Châu Dôc province, these events took place against a restive
ground: the village of Ba Chúc was a strategic base for U.S. Special
and their Khmer Krom Kampuchea collaborators as of 1966; cland
Viet Cong34 organizing also allegedly took place in the village.35 Alleg
that South Vietnamese military commanders were forcing villagers t
minefields planted by the Viet Cong in Ba Chúc were reported
media, suggesting the contested and volatile dynamics at play in the
at that time, Ba Chúc had the second-worst rating of the American H
Evaluation Survey, which measured the degree of the South Vietname
ernment's control (Emerson 1971).36 By the time of the massacre, the dy
of Vietnam's internal civil conflict were entangled with the conflict wit
bodia: in the late 1970s, Vietnamese groups opposed to Hanoi were org
in the strategic Parrot's Beak region and allegedly collaborating with C
dian forces, threatening to destabilize the border from inside (Leighton
449). When, during a cease-fire, Vietnam refused to recognize its adver
sovereignty or accept any of Cambodia's demands, the Khmer Rouge c
out the Ba Chúc massacre in response (O'Dowd 2007).
In 1 984, six years after these bloody events, the Vietnamese govern
established a memorial site in Ba Chúc to house the "Remnants of Pol P
Genocidal Crimes" (Khu chúng tich toi äc diet chůng Pon Pot).37 Its f
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 205
Figure 2 Display of Skulls at the Ba Chúc Memorial (Pháp luât & Xã hôi 201 1
38 On the Memorial Stupa of Choeung Ek, established in 1988, see Hughes 2003;
2004; and Sion 2011.
"Ba Chue and Sam Mountain, Deep into the Mekong Delta of Vietnam" (Hodgkin
At: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei9W8hW29GQ (accessed 3 June 2013).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
206 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
40 For example, rumors circulating on Vietnamese diasporic sites dispute the government's claim
that the Khmer Rouge were the perpetrators, preferring to blame the Vietnamese military (for failure
to respond swiftly) or state (for being behind the massacre in the first place and falsely attributing it
to the Khmer Rouge). See: http://www.quehuongngaymai.com/forums/showthread.php7170457-T
%E 1 %BB%99i-%C3%8 1 c-T%E 1 %BA%A 1 i-Ba-Ch%C3%B Ac (accessed 18 Sept. 2014). Note
the similar disputes that attend the Choeung Ek stupa, as discussed by Hinton 2008: 73-76.
41 The memorial says little regarding the events of spring 1978 that led up to the massacre (least
of all Vietnamese diplomatic or military failures), offering no explanation for the Cambodian action,
save savage aggression.
42 The memorial site does accommodate the performance of some rituals on behalf of the dead,
including the offerings of incense depicted in figure 3, and a death anniversary ( ngàygiô ) ceremony
held each year under sponsorship of the state.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 207
Figure 3 Incense Offerings at Phi Lai Pagoda, Ba Chúc Memorial (photographer ano
request).
43 Unlike the official memorials erected for the "heroic dead" of revolution and war - which typ-
ically feature state symbols and pronouncements (see Malarney 2001) and the socialist-realist mon-
uments that depict civilians in poses of resistance (see Kwon 2006: 141-42), the victims of Ba Chúc
are depicted as they died, abject and anonymous. The images displayed in Ba Chúc are also unlike
the representation of Som Lai massacre victims at the museum in Quâng Ngãi, where numerous dec-
orous portraits of the living as well as images of atrocities depict the slain.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
208 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
For men and youths, they forced them to kneel at the roots of the tree, then str
the head with a hoe. With the women they raped them, then poked tree br
their vaginas. They even forced many people to put their heads on the r
tree and shattered people's heads, grabbing the feet of little children an
against the roots of the tree, crushing their heads. . . . Their evil, there is
could write it, uncle. Because so many people lost their lives at the roots of
Figure 4 Atrocities at the Foot of the Banyan Tree in Ba Chúc {Pháp luât & Xã h
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 209
people {bà con)44 believe this tree is inhabited by the souls of those who were vict
injustice. Therefore, no one dares to trespass.45
The Vietnamese express the transformation of ghosts with the concept giài oan , 'the
eration from grievance,' which alternatively can be called giài nguc, meaning 'op
prison' or 'break the prison.' The idea is that a history of tragic death binds the s
the dead to the mortal drama of death and captivates it to the place of death, thus en
dering a negative condition in the afterlife. The tragic or violent transition to death
into an environment of confinement after death. The most commonly cited exam
the incarceration in post-mortem nguc is where road accidents recur. In these plac
existing afterlife prisoners repeat their tragic history of death, which appears in the
of repeated road accidents in reality. This results in more new fateful inmates in the
and thus makes the site an increasingly solid prison (2008: 128).
44 Contrasted to other relatively neutral terms for referencing people in an area ( nguài d
phuomg ), people in general {nguài ta), the masses {nhân dân ) or neighbors {ho hàng läng g
the term bà con is polysémie, evincing kinship, community, and neighborly relations.
Appendix 1 reproduces the text from which we have excerpted this individual's commen
According to one source, those killed at the tree s toot were fourteen individuals who
taken refuge in the interior cave of the banyan {Già dinh và Xã hôi 2008).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
210 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 211
There is a colossal banyan tree on the Té highway that goes past Ha Tien (Kien
Giang province). The local people assert that though the ghosts of genocide
{bóng ma diet chůng) trace far back, almost every year the tree has taken the
lives of several people.
That's the reason people (bà con) call the tree by many terms like "tree of
the souls of victims of injustice" (cây oan hôn' "haunted tree" (cây ma äm'
and "killer tree" (cây sát nhân).
Traveling to Ba Chúc village (Tri Ton district, An Giang province), people
often remember the barbarous massacre, in which three thousand people were
killed by the army of Pol Pot. More than thirty years have passed but evidence
of the genocide is still readily apparent in this region, which has graves contain-
ing 1,159 skeletons, and the Ba Le and Cay Da caves where Pol Pot's army
threw grenades killing hundreds of people. These don't just testify to the evil
savagery; they are also the remnants of crime in Ba Chúc which continue to
obsess (là nói ám ânh) the local people.
47 From our translation of Pháp luât & Xã hôi (20 1 1 ). Pháp Luât & Xã Hôi, or Law & Society, is
a daily newspaper owned by the Hanoi Department of Justice.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
212 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 213
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
214 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
REFERENCES
Abraham, Nicolas and Maria Torok. 1994. The Shell and the Ke
T. Rand, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and B
Roazen, trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 215
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
2I6 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
Chanda, Nayan. 1986. Brother Enemy: The War after the War. San Francisco: H
Brace Jovanovich.
Cho, Grace M. 2008. Haunting the Korean Diaspora: Shame, Secrecy, and the Forgot-
ten War . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cros, Michèle and Julien Bonhomme, eds. 2008. Déjouer la mort en Afrique: or, orphe-
lins, fantômes, trophées et fétiches. Paris: Harmattan.
Cuevas, Bryan J., ed. 2008. Travels in the Netherworld: Buddhist Popular Narratives of
Death and the Afterlife in Tibet. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cuevas, Bryan J. and Jacqueline I. Stone, eds. 2007. The Buddhist Dead: Practices, Dis-
courses, Representations. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Davis, Colin. 2007. Haunted Subjects : Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis and the Return
of the Dead. New York: Palgrave.
Davis, Erik. 2012. Khmer Spirits, Chinese Bodies: Chinese Spirit Mediums and Spirit
Possession Rituals in Contemporary Cambodia. In Thomas A. Reuter and Alexander
Horstmann, eds., Faith in the Future: Understanding the Revitalization of Religions
and Cultural Traditions in Asia. Leiden: Brill, 177-96.
DeCaroli, Robert. 2004. Haunting the Buddha: Indian Popular Religions and the For-
mation of Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Delaplace, Grégory. 2009. L'Invention des morts: sépultures, fantômes et photographie
en Mongolie contemporaine. Paris: Centre d'Études mongoles et sibériennes, École
pratique des hautes études.
Derrida, Jacques. 1994 [1993]. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of
Mourning and the New International. Peggy Kamuf, trans. New York: Routledge.
(First published in French.)
Durkheim, Émile. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Karen Fields,
trans. New York: Free Press.
Eberhardt, Nancy. 2006. Imagining the Course of Life: Self-Transformation in a Shan
Buddhist Community. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Edensor, Tim. 2005. The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory
in Excessive Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 829-49.
Edensor, Tim. 2008. Mundane Hauntings: Commuting through the Phantasmagoric
Working-Class Spaces of Manchester, England. Cultural Geographies 15: 313-33.
Elliott, David W. D., ed. 1981. The Third Indochina Conflict. Boulder: Westview Press.
Emerson, Gloria. 1971. Villagers Say Saigon Perils Their Lives. New York Times , 10
Jan: 1.
Endres, K. and A. Lauser. 2011. Engaging the Spirit World: Popular Beliefs and Prac-
tices in Modern Southeast Asia. New York: Berghahn.
Ernout, A. and A. Meillet. 1951. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris:
Librairie C., Klincksieck.
Etkind, Alexander. 2009. Post-Soviet Hauntology: Cultural Memory of the Soviet
Terror. Constellations 16: 182-200.
Feist, Sigmund. 1939. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der gotischen Sprache. Leiden: E. J.
Brill.
Feuchtwang, Stephen. 2010. The Anthropology of Religion, Charisma, and Ghosts:
Chinese Lessons for Adequate Theory. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Fortes, Meyer. 1987. Religion, Morality, and the Person: Essays on Tallensi Religion.
Jack Goody, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foss, Karen A. and Kathy L. Domenici. 2001. Haunting Argentina: Synecdoche in
the Protests of the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. Quarterly Journal of Speech 87:
237-58.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 217
Fox, Diane. 2007. 'One Significant Ghost' - Agent Orange: Narratives of Traum
vival, and Responsibility. PhD diss., Anthropology, University of Washington
Franco, Francisco. 2009. Muertos, fantasmas y héroes: el culto a los muertos mi
en Venezuela. Merida: Universidad de los Andes.
Frazer, Sir James George. 1933-1936. The Fear of the Dead in Primitive Religion. 3
vols. London: Macmillan.
Freed, Ruth S. and Stanley A. Freed, 1993. Ghosts: Life and Death in North India.
New York: American Museum of Natural History.
Freud, Sigmund. 1957 [1917]. Mourning and Melancholia. In Strachey, J., ed. The Stan-
dard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud , Volume XIV
(1914-1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsy-
chology and Other Works. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-
analysis, 237-58.
Freud, Sigmund. 1985 [1919]. The Uncanny. In Albert Dickson, ed., Art and Literature:
Jensens 'Gradiva, ' Leonardo Da Vinci, and Other Works. Vol. 14 of the Penguin
Freud Library. Harmonds worth: Penguin, 335-76.
Frosh, Stephen. 2013. Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and Ghostly Transmissions.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Già dình và Xã hôi (Family and society). 2008. Vu thâm sát cûa Pôn Pôt trên dat Viet
Nam (Pol Pot's massacre on Vietnamese soil). At: http://danso.giadinh.net.vn/xa-hoi/
vu-tham-sat-cua-pon-pot-tren-dat-viet-nam-2008 1 024 111151765 .htm (accessed 2
May 2014).
Gordon, Avery F. 2008 [1997]. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imag-
ination. 2d ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gordon, Avery F. 2011. Some Thoughts on Haunting and Futurity. Borderlands 10, 2:
1-21.
Griffiths, Kate and David Evans. 2009. Haunting Presences: Ghosts in French Litera-
ture and Culture. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Gunn, Joshua. 2004. Mourning Speech: Haunting and the Spectral Voices of Nine-
eleven. Text and Performance Quarterly 24: 91-114.
Gustafsson, Mai Lan. 2009. War and Shadows: lhe Haunting oj Vietnam. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992 [1925]. On Collective Memory. Lewis A. Coser, trans.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (First published in French.)
Hertz, Robert. 1960 [1907]. A Contribution to the Study of the Collective Representa-
tion of Death. In Death and the Right Hand. Rodney Needham and Claudia Needham,
trans. Glencoe, 111.: Free Press, 27-86. (First published in French.)
Hinton, Alex L. 2008. Truth, Representation and the Politics of Memory after Genocide.
In Alexandra Kent and David Chandler, eds., People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Reli-
gion, Power and Moral Order in Cambodia Today. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute
of Asian Studies, 62-8 1 .
Hodgkinson, Terry. 2011. Ba Chuc and Sam Mountain, Deep in the Mekong Delta of
Vietnam. At: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei9W8hW29GQ (accessed 3 June
2013).
Holloway, Julian and James Kneale. 2008. Locating Haunting: A Ghost-Hunter's Guide.
Cultural Geographies 15: 297-312.
Holt, John Clifford. 2007. Gone But Not Departed: The Dead among the Living in Con-
temporary Buddhist Sri Lanka. In Bryan Cuevas and Jacqueline Stone, eds., The Bud-
dhist Dead: Practices, Discourses, Representations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii
Press, 326-44.
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
2I8 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
Holt, John Clifford. 2012. Caring for the Dead Ritually in Cambodia. Southeast
Studies 1,1: 3-75.
Horton, Robin. 1993. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Ma
ligion, and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, Rachel. 2003. Memory and Sovereignty in Post- 1979 Cambodia: Cho
and Local Cambodian Memorials. In Susan E. Cook, ed., Genocide in Cambo
Rwanda: New Perspectives. New Brunswick: Transaction, 269-92.
Jeong-mo, Yun. 1998. The Rainy Spell and Other Korean Stories. J. Suh Goppi,
New York: M. E. Sharpe and UNESCO Publishing.
Keller, Nora Okja. 2002. Fox Girl. New York: Penguin.
Kiernan, Ben. 2002. Introduction: Conflict in Cambodia, 1945-2002. Critic
Studies 34, 4: 483-95.
Klima, Alan. 2002. The Funeral Casino: Meditation, Massacre, and Exchange w
Dead in Thailand. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kwon, Heonik. 2006. After the Massacre: Commemoration and Consolation i
and My Lai. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kwon, Heonik. 2008. Ghosts of War in Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge Un
Press.
LaFleur, William R. 1989. Hungry Ghosts and Hungry People: Somaticity and R
ity in Medieval Japan. In Michael Feher, ed., Fragments for a History of the
Body, Part One. New York, Zone Publications, 270-303.
Langford, Jean M. 2013. Consoling Ghosts : Stories of Medicine and Mournin
Southeast Asians in Exile. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Leighton, Marian Kirsch. 1978. Perspectives on the Vietnam-Cambodia Bord
flict. Asian Survey 18: 448-57.
Lewis, Charlton T. and Charles Short. 1962. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Cla
Press.
Lloyd, David. 2005. The Indigent Sublime: Specters of Irish Hunger. Represe
92: 152-85.
Lopatin, Ivan Alexis. 1960. The Cult of the Dead among the Natives of the Amur Basin.
The Hague: Mouton.
Luckhurst, Roger. 2002. The Contemporary London Gothic and the Limits of the 'Spec-
tral Turn.' Textual Practice 16: 527-46.
Malarney, Shaun Kingsley. 2001. "The Fatherland Remembers Your Sacrifice": Com-
memorating War Dead in North Vietnam. In Hue-Tam Ho Tai, ed., The Country of
Memory: Remaking the Past in Late Socialist Vietnam. Berkeley: University of Cal-
ifornia Press, 46-76.
Malarney, Shaun Kingsley. 2002. Culture, Ritual and Revolution in Vietnam. Honolulu:
University of Hawai'i Press.
Malarney, Shaun Kingsley. 2007. Festivals and the Dynamics of the Exceptional Dead in
Northern Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 38, 3: 515-40.
Malinowski, Bronisław 1916. Baloma: The Spirits of the Dead in the Trobriand Islands.
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 46: 353-430.
Marx, Karl. 1977 [1867]. Capital, Volume I. Ben Fowkes, trans. New York: Vintage
Books.
Materials on Special Forces in Vietnam, n.d. From the Center for Military History and
the National Archives: 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces
Outline History of Company D, 1962-1970. Fol. 09, box 03, Glenn Helm Collection,
Vietnam Center and Archive, Texas Tech University. At: http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/
virtualarchive/items.php?item= 1070309027 (accessed 2 May 2014).
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TOWARD A CRITICAL HAUNTOLOGY 219
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
220 LINCOLN AND LINCOLN
This content downloaded from 176.41.181.5 on Mon, 06 Nov 2023 21:40:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms