Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Periodic Diet That Mimics Fasting Promotes Multi-System Regeneration, Enhanced Cognitive Performance and Healthspan
A Periodic Diet That Mimics Fasting Promotes Multi-System Regeneration, Enhanced Cognitive Performance and Healthspan
Correspondence
vlongo@usc.edu
In Brief
Choi et al. show that cycles of a fasting
mimicking diet (FMD) ameliorate disease
severity by suppressing autoimmunity
and stimulating remyelination via
oligodendrocyte regeneration in multiple
sclerosis (MS) mouse models. They also
show that a similar FMD is a safe, feasible,
and possibly a potentially effective
treatment for patients with relapsing-
remitting MS.
Highlights
d FMD reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines and increases
corticosterone levels
Report
CA 90089, USA
2Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine,
CA 90089, USA
5Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
6NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité
*Correspondence: vlongo@usc.edu
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.009
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION
Dietary interventions have not been effective in the Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized
treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we show by T cell-mediated demyelination and neurodegeneration in the
that periodic 3-day cycles of a fasting mimicking CNS (Friese and Fugger, 2005; Pender and Greer, 2007; Sospedra
diet (FMD) are effective in ameliorating demyelin- and Martin, 2005). In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
ation and symptoms in a murine experimental auto- (EAE), an animal model for MS, activated myelin-specific TH1 and
TH17 cells cross the blood-brain barrier and migrate into the CNS,
immune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model. The FMD
where they are activated by local antigen-presenting cells (APCs)
reduced clinical severity in all mice and completely
and promote inflammation (Dhib-Jalbut, 2007; Fletcher et al.,
reversed symptoms in 20% of animals. These 2010; Goverman, 2009; Hemmer et al., 2002). This inflammatory
improvements were associated with increased process leads to oligodendrocyte death, demyelination, and
corticosterone levels and regulatory T (Treg) cell axonal damage, which eventually cause neurologic damage (Luc-
numbers and reduced levels of pro-inflammatory chinetti et al., 1999; Raine and Wu, 1993). Although oligodendro-
cytokines, TH1 and TH17 cells, and antigen-present- cyte precursor cells (OPCs) can migrate to the sites of MS lesions,
ing cells (APCs). Moreover, the FMD promoted they often fail to differentiate into functional oligodendrocytes
oligodendrocyte precursor cell regeneration and (Chang et al., 2002; Wolswijk, 1998). Several MS treatment drugs
remyelination in axons in both EAE and cuprizone have been effective in reducing immune responses, but their
MS models, supporting its effects on both sup- impact on long-term disease progression, accrual of irreversible
neurological disability, and immune system function remains
pression of autoimmunity and remyelination. We
largely unclear, underlining the need for novel therapeutic strate-
also report preliminary data suggesting that an
gies (Wingerchuk and Carter, 2014). Therefore, effective treat-
FMD or a chronic ketogenic diet are safe, feasible, ments for MS may require not only the mitigation of autoimmunity
and potentially effective in the treatment of re- but also the stimulation of oligodendrocyte regeneration and resto-
lapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients ration of a functional myelin sheath. Periodic cycles of prolonged
(NCT01538355). fasting (PF) or of a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) lasting 2 or more
2136 Cell Reports 15, 2136–2146, June 7, 2016 ª 2016 The Author(s).
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Figure 1. FMD Cycles Decrease Disease Severity of the MOG35–55-Induced EAE Model
(A) Diagram displaying the time course of the immunization and the diet interventions.
(B) The EAE severity scores of the control diet (EAE CTRL; n = 23), ketogenic diet (EAE KD; n = 13), semi-therapeutic FMD cycles (EAE FMD (S); n = 7), or
therapeutic FMD cycles (FMD(T); n = 23).
(C) Incidence rate of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD (S) (n = 7–23).
(D) EAE severity score in mice for which FMD(T) completely reversed EAE severity, with no observable disease (score = 0; 5 out of 23 mice).
(E) EAE severity score of the best-performing control mice (n = 12) and FMD(T) mice (n = 12).
(F) EAE severity score of the mice treated with FMD after chronic EAE development (EAE CTRL-FMD; n = 6).
(G–M) Spinal cord sections of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD (T) mice with quantification of H&E staining (G), solochrome cyanine staining (H), and MBP (myelin basic
protein)/SMI32 (I) double staining of spinal cord sections isolated at day 14.
Data are presented as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, Student’s t test, one-way or two-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni post test. Scale bar
represents 200 mm.
days can increase protection of multiple systems against a variety Here, we report on the effects of low-calorie and low-protein
of chemotherapy drugs in mice and possibly humans (Fontana FMD cycles as a treatment in MS mouse models, and we inves-
et al., 2010; Guevera-Aguirre et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2010; Longo tigate the mechanisms involved. Furthermore, we report prelim-
and Mattson, 2014). Moreover, PF or an FMD reverses the immu- inary results on the safety and feasibility of a FMD and a KD in
nosuppression or immunosenescence of either chemotherapy patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
or aging through hematopoietic stem cell-based regeneration
(Brandhorst et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2014). Chronic caloric re- RESULTS
striction, a ketogenic diet (KD), and intermittent fasting have
been shown to help prevent EAE by reducing inflammation and FMD Cycles Reduce Disease Severity in the MOG35–55-
enhancing neuroprotection when administered prior to disease Induced EAE Model
induction or signs (Esquifino et al., 2007; Kafami et al., 2010; Kim We examined the effects of 3 cycles of a very-low-calorie and
do et al., 2012; Piccio et al., 2008), but dietary interventions have low-protein FMD lasting 3 days every 7 days or a KD continued
not been reported to be effective as therapies for EAE or MS or for 30 days in EAE-induced by active immunization with myelin
to promote myelin regeneration. oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35–55 (MOG35–55) (Figure 1A).
Figure 2. FMD Cycles Decrease the Number of Infiltrating T Cells in the Spinal Cord
(A) Total white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte, monocyte, and granulocyte counts of naive, EAE-CTRL, EAE-FMD, and EAE-FMD:RF (after 3 days of re-feeding)
mice after three cycles of the FMD and a matched time point for EAE-CTRL mice.
(B–D) Spinal cord sections (day 14) and quantification at days 3 and 14 after the first sign of EAE for CD11b+ (B), CD4+ (C), and CD8+ (D) (at least six sections per
mouse).
(E) CD11c+ isolated from EAE CTRL or EAE FMD mice on day 3, and quantification of cells from the total isolated splenocyte.
(F) CD4+ gated for CD44low or CD44high cells isolated from EAE CTRL or EAE FMD mice, and quantification of percent splenocytes in CD4+ CD44low (inactive) or
CD4+ CD44high (active) cells.
(G) CD3+ lymphocytes gated for CD4 and MOG35–55/IAb from EAE CTRL or EAE FMD mice, and quantification of MOG-specific CD4+ cells.
(H) CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ isolated from EAE CTRL or EAE FMD mice, and quantification of CD25+ FoxP3+ in CD4+ cells.
(I and J) Intracellular staining for either IFNg (I) or IL17(J) after gated for CD4+ of the naive, EAE CTRL, EAE FMD, EAE FMD:RF and quantification of cell counts.
(K) Quantification of Annexin V+ apoptotic CD3+ MOG35-55/IAb cells.
(L) Quantification of CD4+IFNg+ of BrdU+ lymphocytes.
(M–O) Serum TNF-a (M), IFN-g (N), and IL-17 levels (O) (pg/ml) in naive, EAE CTRL, and EAE FMD mice on day 3 after the first sign of EAE.
(P) Serum corticosterone levels (ng/ml) before immunization, at the time of symptom occurrence, or 3 or 14 days after the initial symptom appeared in the control
or FMD group.
n = 4–8 per group; mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni post test. Scale bar represents 200 mm.
by accelerated remyelination rate in the cuprizone model (Fig- mixed 1:1 with supplemented complete Freund’s adjuvant followed by
ure 5). Notably, because it is the alternation of FMD cycles and 200 ng pertussis toxin (PTX; List Biological Laboratories) intraperitoneally
(i.p.) at days 0 and 2. For adoptive transfer, spleens from active immunized
re-feeding and not the FMD alone that promotes the regeneration
mice were isolated and red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed. Spleen cells were
and replacement of autoimmune cells with naive cells, the use of cultured in the presence of MOG35–55 (20 mg/ml) with rmIL-23 (20 ng/ml) for
chronic restriction or even a chronic KD may not be effective, or 48 hr. Cells were collected and re-suspended in PBS, and 15 million cells
as effective, in the treatment of EAE and MS. were injected intravenously. See Supplemental Experimental Procedures
Finally, we report that the administration of the FMD and for a detailed description of disease severity scoring. All experiments
KD in MS patients was safe and well tolerated and resulted were performed in accordance with approved Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of Southern
in high compliance. We observed positive effects of FMD cy-
California.
cles or KD treatment in RRMS based on changes in self-re-
ported HRQOL and a mild improvement in EDSS (Table S6). Mouse Fasting Mimicking Diet
However, the lack of a proper Mediterranean diet control Mice were fed ad lib with irradiated TD.7912 rodent chow (Harlan Teklad),
makes it difficult to establish whether FMD cycles alone containing 15.69 kJ/g digestible energy (animal-based protein 3.92 kJ/g,
are sufficient to produce these effects. In addition, MRI ana- carbohydrate 9.1 kJ/g, and fat 2.67 kJ/g). The experimental FMD is based
lyses and adequately blinded clinical assessments (EDSS on a nutritional screen that identified ingredients that allow high nourish-
ment during periods of low calorie consumption. The FMD diet consists
and multiple sclerosis functional composite [MSFC]), as well
of two different components, day 1 diet and day 2–3 diet, that were fed
as immune function analyses would greatly enhance the in this order, respectively. See Supplemental Experimental Procedures
strength of the clinical findings. Because, unlike for the mouse for a detailed explanation of the FMD. Mice consumed all the supplied
experiments, the FMD was only administered to patients only food on each day of the FMD regimen and showed no signs of food aver-
once, it will be important to test the effects of multiple FMD sion. After the end of FMD, we supplied TD.7912 chow ad lib for 4 days
cycles on MS patients in larger, randomized, and controlled before starting another FMD cycle. Prior to supplying the FMD, animals
were transferred into fresh cages to avoid feeding on residual chow and
trials.
coprophagy.
Ransohoff, R.M. (2012). Animal models of multiple sclerosis: the good, the bad Wolswijk, G. (1998). Chronic stage multiple sclerosis lesions contain a rela-
and the bottom line. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1074–1077. tively quiescent population of oligodendrocyte precursor cells. J. Neurosci.
Roth, P., Wick, W., and Weller, M. (2010). Steroids in neurooncology: actions, 18, 601–609.
indications, side-effects. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 23, 597–602. Zeng, H., Yang, K., Cloer, C., Neale, G., Vogel, P., and Chi, H. (2013). mTORC1
Sospedra, M., and Martin, R. (2005). Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu. couples immune signals and metabolic programming to establish T(reg)-cell
Rev. Immunol. 23, 683–747. function. Nature 499, 485–490.
Supplemental Information
100 1.5
90 1.0
200 100
80 0.5
70 0 0 0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 D3
ve
D3 D14
e
D14
ve
D3 D14
v
Days after Initial Symptoms
ai
ai
ai
N
N
N
e f g
4 *** *** *** 50 EAE-CTRL
(# of Positive Pixels/mm 2)
EAE-CTRL
Mean clinical EAE score
EAE-FMD 5 EAE-FMD
EAE CTRL 40
Mean Clinical EAE Score
3
EAE Caloric Restricted
4
30
MBP
2 3
2
20
1
1 10
0 0 0
D3 D14 D30 0 5 10 15 20
D14
D3 D30
k **
l **
m n
3 3 40 0.8
EAE-CTRL EAE-CTRL
(# of Positive Pixels/mm 2)
EAE-CTRL
(# of Positive Pixels/mm 2)
EAE-CTRL
Degree of Demyelination
Inflammatory Infiltration
(a.u.)
MBP
20 0.4 *
1 1
** ** 10 0.2
0 0 0 0.0
D3 D30 D3 D30 D3 D30 D3 D30
Figure S1. The beneficial effect of MOG-induced EAE disease progression persist a long
term. Related to Figure 1
a. Body weights of control mice (Black), mice fed with ketogenic diet (Red), and mice fed with
FMD-Thr (Blue) (% BW ± S.E.M.).
b. Serum IGF-1 (ng/mL) level of naive, EAE Day1 before treatment, CTRL and FMD at Day3
and D14 (mean± S.E.M.; p < 0.05; t-test).
c. Serum glucose (mg/dL) level of naive, EAE Day1 before treatment, CTRL and FMD at
Day3, Day7 and D14 (mean± S.E.M.; p < 0.05; t-test).
d. Serum ketone body-βOH Butyrate (mM) level of naive, CTRL and FMD at Day3 and D14.
e. Average clinical score at different time points 3 days, 14 days, or 30 days post initial sign
(n=23; *** p < 0.001; t-test).
f. EAE severity score of control diet (EAE CTRL), and the same dietary composition of the
control diet but matching the calories of the FMD (EAE CR; n=6)] (mean ± S.E.M.).
g. Quantification of MBP of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD on Day14 (n = 8, mean ± S.E.M.).
h-n. The representative staining (h-j) and quantification (k-n) of (h) H&E, (i) solochrome
cyanide, (j) MBP and SMI32 at D3 and D30 of control and FMD (n = 8, mean ± S.E.M., * p <
0.05, ** p<0.01; t-test; Scale bar represents 200 µm).
i
a
l
c
Serum TNF (pg/mL) % of WBC
% of CD4+ Splenocyte
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
50
100
0
50
100
150
CD62L N
ai
EA v
E- e
C
TR
EA L
CD44
Naive EAE
E-
FM
D
p=0.09
j
EAE CTRL
BrdU + (% of live cells)
FMD
*
0
5
10
15
20
EA
E
C
TR
L
d
FMD-RF
EA
E % of CD8 + Splenocyte
Supplemental Figure 2
FM
0
5
10
15
20
p=0.07
D N
ai
EA v
NAIVE
E- e
C
Mon%
Gran%
TR
EAE-FMD
Lymph%
EAE-CTRL
EA
E-
EAE FM D
k
FM
D
m
Serum IFN (pg/mL) CD4+ IL17+
b
F4/80 + Cells
e
(% of BrdU) % of CD8 +
g
% of CD4 + CD44 H
0
25
50
75
100
0
25
50
75
100
0
5
10
15
20
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
2
4
6
EA EA
E N N E
C EA ai
v EA ai
v C
TR TR
L E- e E- e L
C C
*
EA TR TR EA
E
EA L EA L E
FM E- E- FM
D FM FM D
D D
% of CD8 + CD44 H
0
25
50
75
h 100
CD44 L
N
CD44 H
ai
v
EAE FMD
EA
EAE CTRL
E- e
C
TR
NAIVE
EA L
EAE-FMD
E-
EAE-CTRL
FM
D
n
Serum IL-17 (pg/mL)
0
10
20
30
40
50
*
CD62L low
CD62L high
NAIVE
EAE-FMD
EAE-CTRL
Figure S2. FMD modulate immune response by reducing CD4 T cell activation. Related to
Figure 2
a. % Lymphocyte, monocyte, and granulocyte of total white blood cell of Naïve, EAE CTRL,
EAE FMD, and EAE FMD-RF (n=4-6; Mean ± S.E.M.).
b. Quantification of F4/80+ cells (% of total splenocyte) of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD (n=4;
mean ± s.e.m.).
c. % of CD3+ CD4+ splenocyte of control or FMD. FMD treatment had no significant
difference in % of CD3+ cells (n=4; mean ± s.e.m.).
d. % of CD3+ CD8+ splenocyte of control or FMD. FMD treatment had no significant
difference in % of CD3+ cells (n=4; mean ± s.e.m.).
e. CD8+ splenocyte activation level (CD8+CD44High) of naïve, CTRL and FMD (n=4; mean ±
s.e.m.).
f. Representative flow cytometry plot of CD44 and CD62L and quantification of EAE CTRL
and EAE FMD (n=4; mean ± s.e.m.).
g-h. % ratio of effector (CD44High and CD62Llow) to memory T-cells (CD44High and CD62LHigh)
population from (g) CD4+CD44high T cells, and (h) CD8+CD44high T cells (n=4, mean ± s.e.m.).
i. BrdU injection timeline. BrdU was given during the re-feeding period (4 injections within 48
hours, 1 mg of BrdU / injection).
j. Quantification of BrdU+ lymphocytes of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD (n=4, mean ± s.e.m.).
k. Quantification of CD4+IL17+ BrdU+ lymphocytes of EAE CTRL and EAE FMD (n=4, mean ±
s.e.m.).
l-n. Serum levels of (l) TNF-α, (m) IFN-γ, and (n) IL-17 at Day25
Supplemental Figure 3
a b c
600 ** 1500 ** ** 200
Naive *
EAE-CTRL
# GST/mm2
150
400 EAE-FMD 1000
100
200 500
50
*
0 0 0
D3 D14 D3 D14
D
TR
FM
C
E-
E-
EA
EA
d e
*** ***
Naive Naive
Luxol Fast Staining
100 100 *
Cup (5 weeks) Cup (5 weeks)
GST + / DAPI in CC
**
% Ctrl Pixel
50 50
25 25
0 0
Week1 Week3 Week5 Week1 Week3 Week5
Weeks after Cuprizone Withdrawal Weeks after Cuprizone Withdrawal
Figure S3. FMD increases oligodendrocyte differentiation and protection of OPC and
oligodendrocytes. Related to Figure 4
a. Quantification of number of NG2+ (oligodendrocyte precursor cells) at D3 and D14.
b. Quantification of number of GSTπ+ (matured oligodendrocyte) at D3 and D14.
c. Quantification of number of TUNEL+ cells sowing a significantly increased number of
apoptotic cells in control but not in FMD on D3 (n=6; *p<0.05; t-test).
d. Luxol fast staining quantification (% Naïve control pixel) of naïve mice, cuprizone fed (5
weeks) mice, control diet fed mice and FMD cycle fed mice at week 1, week3 and week
5 upon withdrawal of cuprizone diet.
e. GSTπ quantification (% Naïve of # of GSTπ+ / DAPI+ in corpus callosum) of naïve mice,
cuprizone fed (5 weeks) mice, control diet fed mice and FMD cycle fed mice at week 1,
week3 and week 5 upon withdrawal of cuprizone diet.
Supplemental Figure 4
Figure S4. Schematic diagram displaying the time course of clinical trial and the diet
interventions. Related to Figure 4
A randomized parallel-group 3 arm pilot trial (NCT01538355) was with relapsing-
remitting MS patients. 60 patients were randomly assigned to: control diet (CD), KD for 6
months or a single cycle of modified human FMD for 7 days followed by a Mediterranean diet
for 6 months
j
a
p
g
d
m
Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline
Emotional Well-Being (MS-54) Sexual Function (MS-54) Overall Quality of Life (MS-54) Energy / Fatigue (MS-54) Physical Health Composite (MS-54)
Satisfaction Sexual Function (MS-54)
10
15
20
0
5
-5
10
15
20
-10
-5
10
15
10
15
20
0
5
0
5
0
5
10
15
0
5
KD
CD
-10
0
10
20
30
FMD
1
*
1
1
1
1
3
*
M onth
M onth
3
*
3
3
3
M onth
M onth
M onth
M onth
Supplemental Figure 5.
6
6
6
6
6
6
k
e
n
h
b
Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline
Role Limitations Emotional (MS-54) Social Function (MS-54) Change in Health (MS-54) Role Limitations Physical (MS-54) Mental Health Composite (MS-54)
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-5
0
5
10
15
1
1
*
1
1
*
*
3
*
3
*
M onth
3
3
*
Month
M onth
M onth
M onth
*
6
*
6
6
6
6
*
l
i
f
c
o
Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline Mean Change from Baseline
Cognitive Function (MS-54) Health Distress (MS-54) Health Perception (MS-54) Bodily Pain (MS-54) Physical Function (MS-54)
-10
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-5
0
5
10
15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-10
0
10
20
30
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1
1
1
1
1
*
*
3
3
3
3
3
M onth
M onth
M onth
M onth
M onth
*
*
6
6
6
6
6
*
Figure S5. The MS-54 scores at Month 1, Month3 & Month6. Related to Figure 4
This pilot clinical feasibility trial revealed potentially positive effects on HRQOL based on self-
reports for both FMD and KD. Mean change from baseline of CD, FMD, and KD at month 1, 3
and 6 of physical health composite (a), mental health composite (b), physical function (c),
energy/fatigue (d), role of limitation physical (e), bodily pain (f), overall quality of life (g),
change in health (h), health perception (i), sexual function (j), social function (k), health distress
(l), emotional well-being (m), role limitations emotional (n), cognitive function (o), and
satisfaction sexual function (p) are shown. Dotted line represents threshold which is thought to
be clinically important (≥ 5 points) in MS-54 outcome. FMD was performed only once which
resulted in a maximum effect size at month 3; thus study time between Month 3 and 6 is
suggested to be a washout period of FMD treatment (mean ± SED; * p<0.05; Mann-Whitney-U
test. Increase of ≥ 5 points are considered as clinically important). At month 3 and 6, the CD had
negligible effect sizes (0.04 to 0.08) and no clinically meaningful impact (mean change from
baseline (MCB) > 5) (Norman et al., 2003, Rudick et al., 2007, Kappos et al., 2014) on physical
health composite (PHCS; 0.22+11.4; MCB + SD) and on mental health composite (MHCS;
1.88+19.9) and on most sub-scales of the MS-54 (Supplemental Fig. 5; Supplemental Table
3). In contrast, patients in the FMD group showed clinically meaningful improvement on MS-54
scores with medium to large effect sizes (0.4 to 0.5) after 3 months, including increases on PHCS
(7.27+4.3), MHCS (8.85+14.2) and on 10 out of 14 of sub-scales (Supplemental Fig. 5;
Supplemental Table 3). After 6 months, the KD group showed medium to large effect sizes (0.3
to 0.5) and clinically meaningful improvement in PHCS (8.37+11.0), MHCS (6.27+14.8) and on
11 out of 14 of sub-domains (Fig. 4k-n; Supplemental Fig. 4; Supplemental Table 3).
Supplementary Table 1. Summary of demographics and primary outcome at baseline.
Related to Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 4.
Supplementary Table 2. Summary of secondary outcome parameters at baseline. Related
to Figure 4, Supplementary Figure 4 and 5.
Supplementary Table 3. Mean change from baseline (MCB) in Multiple Sclerosis Quality
of Life (MS-54) scores. Related to Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 5.
Supplementary Table 4. Mean Change from Baseline (MCB) in white blood cells and
lymphocytes. Related to Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 5.
Supplementary Table 5. Adverse events and safety parameters. Data are number of events
(number of individuals). Related to Supplementary Figure 5.
Supplementary Table 6. Change from baseline in expanded disability severity scales
(EDSS). Related to Supplementary Figure 5
Supplementary Table 7. Correlation analysis between baseline MS-54 scores and EDSS
scores. Related to Supplementary Figure 5.
Supplementary Table 1: Summary of demographics and primary outcome at baseline. Data are mean (SD), number (%) or median (inter quartile range).
Baseline data of secondary outcomes are given in supplementary table 1. *Kruskal Wallis test for comparison between the three groups was performed.
Baseline data were available for 48 patients deviations are given in brackets (n=control diet, fasting mimicking diet, ketogenic diet).
SD Control Fasting
Total SD Ketogenic SD
Diet SD IQR Mimicking *p-value
(n=48) IQR IQR Diet (n=18) IQR
(n=12) Diet (n=18)
Baseline characteristics
Fatigue Severity Scale 4.3 1.7 3.6 1.9 5.2 1.1 3.9 1.8 0.0235
Timed 25 foot Walk Test in sec. 6.0 6.2 5.7 4.7 5.5 2.1 6.6 9.4 0.3019
9-hole peg test in sec. 21.8 7.2 20.8 3.0 21.9 4.700 22.5 8.1 0.8745
AST - U/l 24.2 8.4 24.5 7.3 25.1 8.6 23.2 9.2 0.6862
y-GT U/l 27.2 38.7 20.9 13.8 36.1 60.2 22.6 16.4 0.804
White Blood Cells count/nl 6.451 2.266 6.097 1.17 6.523 2.742 6.614 2.381 0.8949
Lymphocytes count/nl 1.943 1.028 1.877 0.6592 1.912 1.142 2.018 1.152 0.9287
Supplementary Table 3
Mean change from baseline (MCB) in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MS-54) scores. Comparison for rates of intra- and inter-group change in MS-54
measures. We considered for statistical analysis results of patients with fully completed data sets.*Friedmann test for intra-group gradient. **Mann-Whitney-
U test for inter-group differences. Clinically relevant changes are indicated in bold.
Physical Month 1 12 -1.25 6.44 18 -8.48 15.70 16 -0.87 13.28 -7.23 -15.8 to 1.32 0.38 -8.18 to 8.95
Function Month 3 12 -7.50 11.77 18 3.72 14.21 16 5.69 12.03 11.22 1.06 to 21.38 <0.05 13.19 3.84 to 22.55 <0.005
Month 6 12 -6.67 14.03 18 4.27 9.79 16 7.26 13.07 10.94 2.05 to 19.83 <0.05 13.92 3.34 to 24.51 <0.005
Health Month 1 12 3.75 15.24 17 2.42 11.63 17 -2.65 12.55 -1.33 -11.6 to 8.90 -6.40 -17.0 to 4.20
Perception Month 3 12 0.42 13.39 17 0.40 13.36 17 3.97 18.86 -0.02 -10.4 to 10.33 3.55 -9.48 to 16.59
Month 6 12 6.57 13.51 17 0.36 12.53 17 6.62 15.54 -6.20 -16.2 to 3.81 0.05 -11.4 to 11.46
Energy / Month 1 12 0.00 7.24 17 7.71 15.07 17 3.76 9.54 7.71 -0.97 to 16.39 3.76 -2.63 to 10.16
Fatigue Month 3 12 0.67 17.55 17 9.65 12.89 17 10.35 18.82 8.98 -2.59 to 20.56 9.69 -4.48 to 23.85
Month 6 12 4.23 23.87 17 1.41 13.78 17 10.82 19.79 -2.81 -17.2 to 11.55 6.60 -10.1 to 23.27
Month 1 12 3.18 9.68 18 12.68 27.23 18 5.37 19.56 9.51 -4.98 to 24.00 2.20 -10.3 to 14.71
Pain
Month 3 12 2.36 18.96 18 16.90 24.27 18 4.27 20.04 14.55 -2.51 to 31.60 <0.05 1.91 -13.1 to 16.89
Month 6 12 -0.84 20.26 18 11.19 20.94 18 6.40 17.81 12.03 -3.75 to 27.82 7.23 -7.1 to 21.60
Sexual Month 1 12 5.63 17.38 14 1.79 10.41 16 -2.43 8.69 -3.83 -15.2 to 7.57 -8.06 -19.7 to 3.59
Function Month 3 12 8.61 18.39 14 -1.20 12.16 16 8.84 13.76 -9.81 -22.3 to 2.64 0.23 -12.2 to 12.70
Month 6 12 11.85 17.21 14 5.96 19.46 16 0.52 14.73 -5.89 -20.9 to 9.10 -11.3 -23.8 to 1.09
Social Month 1 12 5.56 10.25 18 -2.77 21.15 18 5.11 15.42 -8.33 -20.2 to 3.59 -0.45 -10.8 to 9.95
Function Month 3 12 4.17 8.35 18 2.55 20.59 18 6.49 20.10 -1.61 -14.5 to 11.27 2.33 -10.3 to 14.93
Month 6 12 1.38 12.74 18 4.41 17.29 18 7.43 12.74 3.03 -8.93 to 14.98 6.05 -3.68 to 15.77
Health Month 1 12 -0.54 16.76 18 8.84 14.88 16 1.941 12.44 9.38 -2.56 to 21.33 2.27 -8.35 to 12.88
Distress Month 3 12 3.09 15.88 18 5.48 14.45 16 4.662 16.05 2.39 -9.08 to 13.86 1.05 -10.7 to 12.84
Month 6 12 4.15 16.50 18 5.72 22.14 16 6.234 14.94 1.57 -13.8 to 16.93 2.08 -10.2 to 14.34
Month 6 12 -0.86 14.58 18 5.51 12.85 18 5.03 17.47 6.37 -3.98 to 16.71 5.89 -6.62 to 18.41
Month 6 12 3.25 21.34 17 4.94 13.23 17 5.53 16.49 1.69 -11.5 to 14.85 2.28 -12.1 to 16.68
Baseline 80.56 26.44 64.81 44.97 82.36 33.57
Role Month 1 12 0.00 28.43 18 12.97 38.17 17 -7.85 32.34 12.97 -13.5 to 39.43 -7.85 -31.7 to 15.98
Limitations
Emotional Month 3 12 2.78 33.23 18 12.97 34.57 17 3.92 28.58 10.19 -15.8 to 36.19 1.14 -22.5 to 24.79
Month 6 12 2.78 41.33 18 -1.85 44.99 17 -3.93 48.42 -4.63 -37.9 to 28.65 -6.70 -42.0 to 28.62
Cognitive Month 1 12 0.25 7.34 18 2.08 15.46 16 2.73 15.97 1.83 -8.01 to 11.68 2.48 -6.88 to 11.85
Function Month 3 12 -1.31 12.88 18 5.21 8.64 16 3.25 16.28 6.52 -1.51 to 14.55 4.57 -7.16 to 16.29
Month 6 12 -1.05 15.95 18 2.43 15.77 16 7.03 16.59 3.49 -8.61 to 15.58 8.08 -4.73 to 20.90
Change in Month 1 12 -2.08 16.71 18 12.50 23.09 18 11.11 26.04 14.58 -1.31 to 30.48 <0.05 13.19 -4.24 to 30.63
Health Month 3 12 -4.17 20.87 18 15.28 22.91 18 16.67 30.92 19.44 2.55 to 36.34 0.01 20.83 -0.09 to 41.76 <0.05
Month 6 12 -2.08 19.82 18 13.89 19.60 18 14.58 29.78 15.97 0.94 to 31.00 <0.05 16.67 -3.43 to 36.76
Satisfaction Month 1 12 -3.47 10.92 16 7.29 21.92 16 0.9375 15.62 10.77 -2.31 to 23.85 4.41 -6.45 to 15.27
with Sexual
Function Month 3 12 6.93 21.87 16 15.63 31.91 16 0.01 21.09 8.70 -13.4 to 30.76 -6.93 -23.7 to 9.89
Month 6 12 4.15 28.56 16 14.59 30.36 16 3.14 27.37 10.44 -12.8 to 33.68 -1.01 -22.9 to 20.87
Supplementary Table 4
Mean Change from Baseline (MCB) in white blood cells and lymphocytes. Comparison for rates of intra- and inter-group change in outcome measures. *
Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for intra-group comparison. **Mann-Whitney-U test for inter-group differences.
White Blood Baseline 6.10 1.17 6.52 2.74 6.61 2.38 Mean Lower Upper Mean Lower Upper
Cells
Month 1 12 0.19 1.22 18 -0.94 2.13 0.08 18 -0.44 1.42 -1.13 -2.53 to 0.27 0.09 -0.63 -1.66 to 0.40
count/nl
Month 3 12 0.49 1.21 18 -0.18 1.73 18 -0.27 1.95 -0.67 -1.85 to 0.52 -0.76 -2.06 to 0.53
Month 6 12 0.81 1.77 18 -0.48 2.06 18 -0.72 1.75 -1.29 -2.78 to 0.20 0.07 -1.52 -2.86 to -0.18 <0.05
Month 3 12 0.34 0.47 <0.05 18 0.05 0.50 18 -0.09 0.64 -0.29 -0.66 to 0.08 -0.43 -0.87 to 0.01 <0.05
Month 6 12 0.31 0.51 <0.05 18 -0.19 0.83 18 -0.20 0.60 0.08 -0.50 -1.05 to 0.06 0.07 -0.51 -0.94 to -0.08 <0.01
Supplementary Table 5
Adverse events and safety parameters. Data are number of events (number of individuals). Control Diet
(CD), Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD), Ketogenic Diet (KD).
CD FMD KD
Total adverse events 21 (11) 20 (14) 24 (14)
Respiratory tract infection 13 (9) 8 (7) 13 (12)
Transient reduced gait performance 0 6 (6) 0
Periapical periodontitis 1 (1) 1 (1) 0
Depression 0 1 (1) 0
Diarrhea 3 (3) 0 3 (3)
Dizziness 0 1 (1) 0
Feel cold 0 0 1 (6)
Headache 0 2 (2) 2 (2)
Nausea 0 0 2 (2)
Pain 4 (3) 1 (1) 2 (2)
Supplemental Table 6
Change from Baseline in Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS).
Data are median (IQR). Mann-Whitney-U test for comparison between *CD
and FMD or **CD and KD. CD=Control Diet. FMD=Fasting Mimicking Diet.
KD=Ketogenic Diet.
CD FMD KD p* p**
Difference
0 (0 to 0) 0 (-1 to 0) 0 (-0.5 to 0) <0.05 <0.05
at month 3
Correlation analysis between baseline MS-54 scores and EDSS score of the 48 RRMS patients.
Deviations are given in brackets.
EDSS
rs p-value