Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RC Chapter5
RC Chapter5
Chapter 5
Fl
Flexures:
T Beams, Beams with Compression
Reinforcement and Special Cases
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 3
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 2 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 4
1
5-2 T Beams 5-2 T Beams
Analysis of T beams
Effective flange width and transverse reinforcement Generally compression of T beams is rectangular
In Fig 5-5, the forces acting on the flange of a simply Calculation of moment follows the steps mentioned in
supported T beam is shown. the previous chapter
At the support there are no compressive stresses in To avoid the need to locate the centroid, two
the flange and at midspan, the width is stressed in hypothetical beams can be considered:
compaction 1. Beam F
R l ffor estimating
Rules ti ti ththe width
idth ffor d
design
i purpose are: 2. Beaw W
1. Width of slab effective as a T beam flange shall not exceed
one quarter the length of the beam
2. Effective overhanging slab width on each side of the web
should not exceed the smaller of either eight times the slab
thickness or half the clear distance to next web beam
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 5 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 7
5-2 T Beams
Beam F
From Fig 5 5-7c
7c, beam F has a compression zone
consisting of overhanging flanges, area, stress.
Area of reinforcement required in Beam F,
2
5-2 T Beams 5-2 T Beams
Beam W
From Fig 5-7d
5 7d, beam W has a rectangular width bw, T Beam = Beam T + Beam W
having a compression zone of are bwa and utilising the
remaining tensile steel Mn = Mnf + Mnw
Area of tensile steel, Asw = As – Asf
⎡ ⎛ hf ⎞⎤ ⎡ ⎛ a ⎞⎤ (5-5a)
Compression force Cw = 0.85f’cbwa M n = ⎢0.85 f c' (b − bw )h f ⎜⎜ d − ⎟⎟⎥ + ⎢0.85 f c bw a⎜ d − 2 ⎟⎥
'
⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎦ ⎣ ⎝ ⎠⎦
Asw f y (5-3)
a= or
0.85 f c'bw
⎡ ⎛ hf ⎞⎤ ⎡ ⎛ a ⎞⎤
M n = ⎢ Asf f y ⎜⎜ d − ⎟⎟⎥ + ⎢ Asw f y ⎜ d − ⎟⎥ (5-5b)
⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎦ ⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎦
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 9 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 11
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 10 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 12
3
5-3 Beams With Compression
Reinforcement
Reasons for providing Compression reinforcement
There are four primary reasons
1. Reduced sustained-load deflections – Addition of compression
reinforcement reduces long-term deflections of a beam
subjected to sustained loads. Fig 5-14 presents deflection-time
diagrams for beams with and without compression
reinforcement
Fig 5-12
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 13 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 15
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 14 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 16
4
Case 1: Compression Steel Yields
( ⎛ a⎞
M n 2 = As − As' f y ⎜ d − ⎟ ) (5-10)
⎝ 2⎠
Fig 5-17
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 17 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 19
a=
[A − A (1− 0.85 f
s
'
s c
'
fy fy)]
'
0.85 f b
c
(5-9b)
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 18 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 20
5
Case 2: Compression Steel Does Not Yield 5-4 Unsymmetrical Beam Sections Or
Assuming tensile steel yields, internal forces in beam are Beams Bent About Two Axes
T = AsFy
Fig
g 5-22 shows a cross section
Cc = 0.85fc'ba (5-14a) of an inverted L-shaped beam
loaded with gravity loads.
Ignoring correction done to Eq 11b, we have Since moment is about
( )
horizontal axis, lever arm must
Cs = Esεs' As' (5-14b) be vertical. So,
This can be reduced to a quadratic equation g
jjd = d − (5-17)
(0.85f b)a +(0.003E A − A f )a −(0.003E A β d ) = 0
c
' 2 '
s s s y
'
s s 1
' (5-15) 3
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 21 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 23
© 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 22 © 2006 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 24