Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vulnerability and Capability Factors For The Indon
Vulnerability and Capability Factors For The Indon
Vulnerability and Capability Factors For The Indon
1
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh
Nopember, Surabaya, 60111
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Bangkalan,
69162
Corresponding email: fitri.agustina@trunojoyo.ac.id
1. Introduction
One of the biofuels developed in Indonesia is biodiesel. Biodiesel is an alternative fuel sourced from
vegetable oil, animal fat or used cooking oil through a transesterification process using alcohol. The
potential of biodiesel is as a substitute for diesel fuel because of its similar characteristics. In addition,
biodiesel is a renewable fuel, easy to process, safe for the environment and biodegradable [1] [2].
Based on a study by [2], palm oil is an agricultural product with the highest priority as feedstock for
biodiesel production. This study was conducted by considering several criteria, i.e., surplus food, crop
productivity, biofuel yields, multipurpose energy plants, plant development readiness, government
policies and land utilization does not compete with crops /easy to grow on marginal land. Palm oil as a
feedstock for biodiesel production is obtained from Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB), which is processed to
produce products such as Crude Palm Oil (CPO), Palm Kernel Oil (PKO) and Palm Kernel Cake (PCK).
In addition, to fulfil the needs of the food and pharmaceutical industries, CPO is also used to produce
biodiesel.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
From year to year, the development of biofuels in Indonesia has increased in quantity and capacity.
This indicates that the government's efforts to encourage the development of biofuels are on the right
track. The target for biofuel utilization of 5% (22.26 million KL) must be realized by 2025 [3]. To
expand the use of biodiesel, the government made a mandatory policy of B20 biodiesel which was
carried out gradually (Decree of Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources No.12, 2015) for both Public
Service Obligation (PSO) and Non-PSO transportation, industry and commercial, and electricity sectors.
In this policy, the minimum percentage of biodiesel is 20% with diesel oil in the blending refinery. In
addition, [4] stated that the B20 mandate had positively affected the economy, social, and environment,
although it is still in progress towards optimality. Furthermore, the number of blending rates is
increasing based on the feasibility research conducted. One of the progressive achievements of the
government's mandate is that the implementation of B30 officially begins in January 2020. However,
the realization rate of biodiesel production is always under the target (from 2009 to 2019) [5]. This
condition implies the existence of a complex problem that causes the production target has not been
achieved. The source of this problem may be internal and external to the biodiesel supply chain.
[6] state that the main problem in managing the supply chain is the existence of uncertainty.
Although it was detected that there were several attempts to minimize the effect of uncertainty in the
decision-making process, such as reducing variation and increasing forecasting accuracy [7]. However,
there is uncertainty with events that decision-makers cannot predict or control, such as natural hazards,
accidents, or even deliberate actions [8]. This can lead to disturbances that have a negative impact on
performance, profitability, sales, cost structure, and inventory [9]. Indonesia is committed to improving
the biodiesel industry, issues related to uncertainty and the impact of the risks should be considered in
the future [10]. In addition to the uncertainty that will disrupt supply chain resilience, the challenge of
biodiesel utilization is also contributed by the complexity of the supply chain network from upstream to
downstream (five connected layers) and involves numerous actors [11]. Therefore, to help enterprises
become more resilient or less vulnerable to disruption, resilience capabilities should be developed in SC
[12]. This study aims to explore and elaborate on the vulnerability and capability factors as a construct
of biodiesel supply chain resilience in Indonesia. Analysis and synthesis were carried out by conducting
literature studies and interviewing experts.
This study adopts the biodiesel supply chain network in the Indonesia by [11], shown in Figure 1. The
network structure shows that there are three parts with five layers, following the supply chain concept
plan, source, make, and deliver as follows:
1. The upstream network ensures and provides Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) harvested from private,
government, and individual oil palm plantations. FFB is the raw material for Crude Palm Oil
(CPO) production.
3. The downstream network will distribute biodiesel to end customers through dispensing stations.
Previously, biodiesel must be mixed with diesel oil according to a mandated ratio of 20 or 30%
at the blending station.
The biodiesel supply chain has different characteristics than the manufacturing supply chain.
Furthermore, the biodiesel supply chain uses raw materials for agricultural products, which are
characterized by (1) perishable agricultural products, (2) planting, growing, and harvesting processes
depending on climate and season, and (3) various sizes and shapes of products, (4) large, i.e., the product
2
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
is difficult to transport or manage because of the size, shape, and complexity of the product [2].
Considering these factors, the uncertainty factors will be more complex in the biodiesel supply chain
than in the general manufacturing supply chain.
Biomass production
CPO Feedstock
at Oil Palm Biorefinery Blending Station Dispensing station
Production
Plantation
Petroleum Industry
Private estate plantation
Smallholder plantation
Export Export
CPO B100
This research was conducted in two steps. The primary objective of this study is to determine
vulnerability and capability factors in the Indonesian biodiesel supply chain. The steps described as
follows:
1. The first step is to determine the dimensions of supply chain resilience. Resilience can be
examined from two aspects: vulnerability and capability [13] [14]. [15] defines vulnerability as
the properties of a production system that can impair or limit its ability to threats and
unanticipated occurrences deriving from both within and outside the system's boundaries.
Meanwhile, capability is a characteristic that allows a company to predict and overcome change
[14]. The next step is to identify the vulnerability and capability factors of the Indonesian
biodiesel supply chain. According to prior research, the biodiesel supply chain is susceptible to
a number of uncertainties. This study classifies disruptions according to their origin, namely
internal sources such as oil palm supply, demand, lead time, and external sources, such as natural
disasters and artificial disasters [16] [17]. The capability factors will be explored according to
the supply chain resilience literature in the context of biodiesel.
2. The second step is to validate vulnerability and capability factors with experts. This process is
conducted by making a questionnaire addressed to three experts in the biodiesel supply chain.
Experts will assess with scores from 1 to 5; the higher the value given to the assessment, the
more important these factors are to be considered. After that, we determine a cut value to select
these factors. Most of the research on supply chain resilience focuses solely on the aspect of
supply chain capability. The supply chain's resilience increases along with its capabilities to
mitigate vulnerabilities.
3
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
on the uncertainty identified in previous studies (Figure 2), added to the current condition, namely the
COVID-19 pandemic as a natural disturbance. The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting public health and
business operations. Moreover, the spread is very fast and deadly. The biodiesel supply chain network,
characterized by many actors and layers, will experience a domino effect from the pandemic. Therefore,
the biodiesel supply chain must be sustainable and robust to adapt to fluctuating market risks due to the
covid-19 pandemic.
This study employs a questionnaire to validate the factors of resilience, vulnerability, and supply
chain capability by providing a rating score from 1 to 5, showing 1 - not important, 2 - little importance,
3 - quite important, 4 - important, and 5 - very important.
Dispensing
Blending station
station
Crude Transport
Policy and Biodiesel Biodiesel Policy and
oil ation and
regulation price demand regulation
price logistic
4
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
5
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
[4] has described several challenges related to optimizing the use of biodiesel to promote energy
security, including distribution patterns that are still not synchronized between government regulations,
the biofuel industry, and oil companies (Pertamina). For example, inaccuracies in determining the
delivery point in the distribution network of biodiesel and fossil fuels will affect the mode of
transportation and lead to varying transportation costs. The significant price difference between
biodiesel and diesel fuel poses challenges for the development of the biodiesel industry. In addition, the
rapid upgrading and adoption of production technology will increase production capacity. Although
Indonesia is the biggest producer of palm oil in the world, the productivity of oil palm plantations still
needs improvement.
The literature study results need to be validated using expert opinion to determine whether the
vulnerability and capability factors reflect actual conditions in the biodiesel supply chain. Experts have
provided helpful feedback for developing a supply chain resilience model. Some relevant vulnerability
and capability factors in the biodiesel supply chain are indicated in both Table 4 and Table 5. We set a
threshold value to decide whether these factors deserve to be considered final. The decision threshold
value is 2.5, representing the scale's median value.
Turbulence:
Fluctuations in Fresh Fruit Bunch
T1 4 3 3 3.33
(FFB) price selected
Fluctuations in Crude Palm Oil
T2 4 4 3 3.67
(CPO) price selected
T3 Technology failure 4 4 3 3.67 selected
T4 Fluctuations in biodiesel price 2 2 2 2.00 not selected
T5 Unpredictable biodiesel demand 1 1 1 1.00 not selected
T6 Fluctuations in crude oil price 5 4 4 4.33 selected
T7 Pandemic 4 5 5 4.67 selected
External pressure:
E1 Policy and regulation change 4 5 3 4.00 selected
Resources limit:
R1 Fluctuation in FFB supply 1 1 2 1.33 not selected
R2 Fluctuation in CPO supply 3 4 5 4.00 selected
R3 Land farming availability 4 4 3 3.67 selected
R4 Production and operation capacity 4 4 4 4.00 selected
Transportation and distribution
R5 3.00
capacity 3 4 2 selected
In the supply chain vulnerability factors shown in table 4, there are several factors that were not
selected based on expert opinion. These factors are fluctuations in biodiesel price, unpredictable
biodiesel demand and fluctuations in FFB supply. On the other hand, the capability factors obtain an
average value above the decision threshold value (2.5) in Table 5. Therefore, the overall capability factor
will be considered in developing the supply chain resilience framework. It is hoped that these experts
have experience handling vulnerabilities and have developed appropriate mitigation capabilities.
6
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
Table 5. Capability factors of the biodiesel supply chain based on expert opinions
Code Capabilities A B C Average Decision
Flexibility in sourcing:
FS 1 Supplier contract flexibility 4 3 4 3.67 selected
FS 2 Multiple sources 3 5 4 4.00 selected
Flexibility in order fulfilment:
FF 1 Alternate distribution channels 3 2 3 2.67 selected
FF2 Multi sourcing 5 5 3 4.33 selected
Capacity:
C1 Reserve capacity 3 3 3 3.00 selected
Visibility:
V1 Information technology 4 5 4 4.33 selected
v2 Information exchange 5 3 4 4.00 selected
Adaptability:
A1 Alternative technology development 4 4 5 4.33 selected
A2 Learning from experience 3 4 3 3.33 selected
A3 Lead time reduction 2 4 3 3.00 selected
Collaboration:
CO1 Collaborative forecasting 4 3 5 4.00 selected
CO2 Risk sharing with partners 3 4 3 3.33 selected
A supply chain that fails to build sufficient capabilities to compensate for the high level of
vulnerability will be vulnerable to risk. On the other hand, supply chains that invest too much in
capabilities while vulnerabilities are low will erode profits. Thus, supply chain resilience is obtained
from balancing vulnerability and capability factors. In line with [12], this study determines the
vulnerability and capability factors in the biodiesel supply chain. In the cooperation and coordination of
all supply chain entities, each actor and company must maintain the balance between these capabilities
and vulnerabilities.
4. Conclusion
The resilience of the Indonesian biodiesel supply chain is affected by the types of vulnerabilities and
capabilities that entities have along the supply chain. In this study, several vulnerabilities and capability
factors have been identified. Price, technology failure, pandemic, policy and regulation, supply,
capacity, and land availability are vulnerability factors. Meanwhile, capabilities that should be
developed to mitigate negative risks from vulnerabilities such as supplier contract flexibility, multiple
sources, alternate distribution channels, multi-sourcing, reserve capacity, alternative technology
development, learning from experience, lead time reduction, information technology, information
exchange, collaborative forecasting, and risk sharing with partners. The practical implication is that
practitioners will understand the significant vulnerability and capability factors that can be a source of
information for developing biodiesel supply chain resilience. Several issues related to these factors
should be considered in further studies so that the use of biodiesel is more expansive and achieves the
target as mandated by the government. A detailed analysis of disturbances, recovery processes, and
adaptation efforts will be a significant agenda in future research, particularly in determining the
relationship between capability and vulnerability factors. Finally, considering the relationship between
vulnerability and capability factors, supply chain resilience will be mapped, and strategies to increase
resilience will be formulated.
7
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
References
8
International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy (2022) IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1187 (2023) 012037 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1187/1/012037
[19] Helena Carvalho H, V Cruz-Machado and Tavares J G 2012 A mapping framework for assessing
Supply Chain resilience Int. J. Logistics Systems and Management 12 No. 3
[20] Lakovou E, Vlachos D and Xanthopoulos A 2007 An analytical methodological framework for
the optimal design of resilient supply chains International Journal of Logistics Economics and
Globalisation 1 No. 1 1–20
[21] Aigbogun O, Ghazali Z, and Razali R 2014 A Framework to Enhance Supply Chain Resilience
The Case of Malaysian Pharmaceutical Industry Global Business and Management Research:
An International Journal 6 No. 3
[22] Kochan C G and Nowicki D R 2018 Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and
typological framework International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics
Management 48 Issue: 8 842-865