Professional Documents
Culture Documents
39 Experimental Evaluation On Dielectric and Thermal Characteristics of Nano Filler Added Transformer Oil
39 Experimental Evaluation On Dielectric and Thermal Characteristics of Nano Filler Added Transformer Oil
Viscosity of a fluid is a very important property which 0.05%wt 36.61 37.30 7.26 9.28
should be considered for determining the heat transfer rate. A
The values of the specific resistivity of the nano fluids are flash point (°C) % decrement
Samples
tabulated in Table III. The specific resistivity decreases with ZrO2 TiO2 ZrO2 TiO2
increase in the concentration of nano fillers. The maximum Pure 156 156 - -
increase in specific gravity is achieved for 0.005%wt of nano 0.005%wt 154 148 1.28 5.12
fillers. 0.01%wt 152 150 2.56 3.84
TABLE III. RESULTS OF SPECIFIC RESISTIVITY 0.05%wt 154 152 1.28 2.56
specific resistivity(1012Ω-cm) % increment
Samples IV. ANALYSIS
ZrO2 TiO2 ZrO2 TiO2
Pure 265 265 - -
To understand the physical concept behind the improvement
0.005%wt 330 350 24.5 42.27 in the dielectric characteristics a study about the interaction
0.01%wt 313 317 18.11 28.86 between the base fluid and the nano particle is necessary.
0.05%wt 295 290 11.3 17.88
George Hwang et al. [5] considered the relaxation time of
D. Dielectric Dissipation Factor the nano particle has a major bearing on the electrodynamics
during streamer developments. They have concluded that
The results of Dielectric Dissipation factor for the nano
shorter charge relaxation time constant for transformer
fluids are given in Table IV. 0.01% wt of ZrO2 and 0.005%wt
oil/nano particle system affects the electrodynamic process
of TiO2 have the lowest value of Dielectric Dissipation Factor.
during streamer propagation. The charge relaxation time was
TABLE IV. RESULTS OF DISSIPATION FACTOR
given by
Breakdown Voltage( kV) % decrement
Samples
ZrO2 TiO2 ZrO2 TiO2 τ = (2 ε 1 + ε 2) / (2σ1 + σ2) (1)
Pure 0.00032 0.00032 - - where,
0.005%wt 0.00021 0.00014 34.37 56.25
σ1 (1*10-12) and ε1 (2.2) are the electrical conductivity and
0.01%wt 0.00020 0.00015 37.5 53.12
permittivity of transformer oil.
0.05%wt 0.00022 0.00022 31.25 31.25
σ2 (1*10-10) and ε2 (25) are the electrical conductivity and
the permittivity of ZrO2 nano particles.
E. Kinematic Viscosity
σ2 (1*10-12) and ε2 (85) are the electrical conductivity and
The variation of the Kinematic Viscosity with the particle
the permittivity of TiO2 nano particles.
concentration is tabulated in Table V. It is observed that the
kinematic viscosity increases with an increase in the particle Substituting the values, the relaxation time thus obtained is
concentration. The increase in the kinematic viscosity at very large. This indicates that the relaxation time theory has
higher particle concentrations is due to the presence of more some limitations.
number of solid nano particles which hinder the flow of the
The increment can be understood by considering the
liquid. No thinning of the liquid was observed as reported in
properties of materials at a nano scale. The basic reason
certain literatures [7]. Choi et al. [8] have also observed an
behind differing properties of materials in the nano scale is the
increase in viscosity with increase in particle concentrations.
high surface to volume ratio of nano particles. At the macro
TABLE V. RESULTS OF KINEMATIC VISCOSITY scale, the surface to volume ratio is less and the properties of
the material depends on the properties of the volume atoms
Kinematic Viscosity (Cst) % increment
Samples
ZrO2 TiO2 ZrO2 TiO2 (Surface atoms are negligible when compared to volume
Pure 9.19 9.19 - -
atoms). In the nano scale, the surface atoms are higher when
compared to the volume atoms and hence the property of the
0.005%wt 9.81 10.49 6.7 14.14 bulk material depends on the properties of the surface atoms.
0.01%wt 10.53 11.16 14.58 21.43 In turn the properties of the surface atoms depend on their
0.05%wt 11.21 12.24 21.98 33.18 surroundings i.e. the interface between the nano particle and
the base medium. Thus, the property of a material at the nano
F. Flashpoint scale depends on the interfacial properties.
The flash point obtained for the different nano fluids are
Smith et al. [9] suggested the formation of a local
tabulated in Table VI. The results show that there only a slight
conductive region i.e., stern layer at the interface. Since the
variation in the flash point with the addition of nano fillers.
charges are active in this region, the probability of electron
scattering may be high. Moreover the change in the local
structure and the trap sites may reduce the electron mobility
thus causing less damage to the material and thus higher [1] Clement Kleinstreuer, Yu Feng, ‘Experiment and theoretical studies of
nanofluid thermal conductivity enhancement: a review’, Nanoscale
breakdown strength. research letters 2011, 6:229.
[2] Indranil Manna, ‘Synthesis, Characterization and application of
V. CONCLUSIONS nanofluid-an overview’, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 2009,
Vol.89.
In this work, new colloidal solutions comprising of TiO2 [3] Singh A.K., ‘Thermal Conductivity of nanofluids’, Defence Science
and ZrO2 nano fillers in Transformer oil were prepared and Journal, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp.600-607, 2008.
[4] V.Segal, A.Hjortsberg, A.Rabinovich, D.Nattrass, and K.Raj,
their dielectric and thermal properties were studied. The “AC(60Hz) and impulse breakdown strength of a colloidal fluid based
enhancement in the breakdown Voltage values were found to on transformer oil and magnetite nanoparticles,” in IEEE International
be higher in TiO2 nano fluids when compared to ZrO2 nano Symposium on Electrical Insulation ISEI98, Arlington, VA,USA,June 7-
10,pp.619-622,1998.
fluids. This may be due to the higher relative permittivity of [5] J.George Hwang, Markus Zahn, Francis M.O’Sullivan, Leif
TiO2 nano fillers. The kinematic viscosities of TiO2 nano A.A.Pettersson, Olof Hjortstam,and Rongsheng Liu. “Electron
fluids were higher than ZrO2 nano fillers because the TiO2 Scavenging by Conductive Nanoparticles in Oil Insulated Power
Transformers,” 2009 Electrostatics Joint Conference-Paper 1.1:1-12.
nano fillers are greater in size thus they prevent the fluid flow. [6] Yu-zhen Lv, Xiao-xin Li, Yue-fan Du, Fo-chi Wang and Cheng-rong Li.
“Preparation and breakdown Strength of TiO2 Fluids Based on
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transformer Oil,” 2010 Annual Report Conference on Electrical
Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena.
The author thanked Dr. G. Sakthinathan, Dr. N. [7] David C.Venerus, and Jacopo Buongiarno, “Viscosity measurements on
colloidal dispersions (nanofluids) for heat transfer applications” Applied
Balasubramanian, Anna University, Chennai for providing the Rheology 2009, Volume 20- Issue-4.
instruments and Mr.P.Sirsabesan, Managing Director, Shree [8] Choi C., Yoo H.S., Oh J.M., “Preparation and heat transfer properties of
Abirami Engineering Works,Chennai who helped to measure nanoparticle-in-transformer oil dispersions as advanced energy-efficient
coolants”, Current Applied physics Journal 2007, Pg. 710-712.
mechanical parameters. Specially thanked PG students [9] R.C.Smith, C.Liang, M.Landry, J.K.Nelson and L.S. Schadler. “The
Mr.Sandeep and Mr.Ramkumar both helped in the sample Mechanisms Leading to the Useful Electrical Properties of Polymer
preparation and experimental work. Nanodielectrics,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical
Insulation Vol.15, No. 1, February 2008.
REFERENCES [10] Transformers, BHEL, Bhopal, Tata Mcgraw-Hill Publishing Company
Limited, Seventh Reprint, 1995
.