Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question Paper-Take Home Exercise I
Question Paper-Take Home Exercise I
Take-Home Exercise I
(Time allowed: 6 hours)
Starting time: 12:00pm (Nov.18)
Deadline: 18:15pm (Nov.18)
Late submission will be punished in the way that 10% of marks will be deduced for
every 60 minutes late.
And there is ONLY allowing to submit your answer for ONE time for turnitin
checking, no second check (for re-submission) allowed. In order NOT to become a
plagiarism case, please don’t copy directly from your source of information, but
make use of your own word to repeat your understanding of the idea from your
information source (i.e. paraphrasing). If you use too many direct quotations, you will
be easily getting a very high rate of similarity. The tolerance degree is NOT more
than 20% of similarity (excluding the references and cover page (if any)). Once more
than 30%, your work will be picked out for further investigation by the Faculty.
Your answers must be put on a separate paper , you need write down your full name,
student ID and those question no. for your answer. Students who do not answer the
question one by one (with question no.) , or present the answers in one piece of
essay format , marks will also get deduced (around 10 marks will be deduced).
Question section
Read the following news reporting, and then answer those 5 questions after this
news reporting. The Chinese text is the original news and the English translation is
done by Google Translation.
區議會選舉︱林琳指上門叩門尋三會提名屬「滋擾」 田北辰:坐喺度唔郁
又話我唔盡力
District Council Election︱Lam Lin said that knocking-on-doors to
Four candidates from the Roundtable had earlier "knocked on doors from door to door"
during the district election nomination period, knocking on the door of a total of 241
people (who are the assigned members who can nominate candidates) . Among them, 200
people did not answer the door, and 15 people refused to listen to their political platform
introduction after answering the door. Tian Beichen earlier criticized this move as "a
complete betrayal of the responsibilities that a nominee should have." DAB Joint Election
Committee member Lam Lin pointed out at a Legislative Council committee today (7th)
that in past elections, we had to search for nominations from the three committees
ourselves. If we could not find them, we could only "hope that they would see some of our
news reports." However, in order to obtain nominations in this election , some applicants
even went to the homes of members of the Three Associations to "ring the bell" and
disturb other people's families. They believed that such an approach was undesirable
because "it is not easy to review their own abilities, or they may be in trouble." They asked
how to ensure that the Three Associations The meeting will be undisturbed.
民建聯的林琳指上門到三會成員家門「撳鐘」滋擾別人家人,認為如此做法不
可取。立法會直播截圖
Lam Lin from the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong
Kong (DAB) said that going to the homes of members of the Three
Associations to "ring the bell" (for getting the nomination) would
disturb other people's families, and believed that this approach was
undesirable.
曾國衞指,參選人士選用較為急燥的方法獲取提名,如有需要可報警求助。立
法會直播截圖
Tsang Kwok-wai pointed out that candidates use more hasty
methods to obtain nominations and can call the police for help if
necessary.
田北辰回應指,如今尋求提名的努力,竟然被說成「滋擾」。資料圖片
Tian Beichen responded that our efforts to seek nominations are
now being called a "nuisance."
田北辰直言「敲門拎提名,又話我滋擾;坐喺度唔郁,又話我唔盡力搵提名,
咁不如直接同我講唔俾我哋選算啦」。資料圖片
Tian Beichen (Michael) said bluntly, "If you knock-on-the-door to
seek for nominations, you say I'm a nuisance; if you sit here and
feel depressed, you say I'm not trying my best to get nominations,
so why don't you just tell me directly that you won't let us become
the candidate for the election?"
狄志遠稱取提名困難,曾國衞回應指以前太容易「畀人騙取議席」。資料圖片
Di Zhiyuan said that it was difficult to get nominated, and Tsang
Kwok-wai responded that it was too easy to "defraud people to get
seats" in the past.
曾國衞:如有需要可報警處理
田北辰:努力尋提名竟被稱「滋擾」
他批評:「敲門搵提名,又話我滋擾;坐喺度唔郁,又話我唔盡力搵提名。見
面會又唔肯搞,咁不如直接同我講唔俾我哋選算啦。」
Tian Beichen, who had previously tried unsuccessfully to seek nominations for party
members, was strongly dissatisfied with the "nuisance" remarks. He pointed out that it is
already very difficult for small political parties to contact members of the Three
Committees, and they (Members of Tien’s organization) did not want to use knocking on
doors until the last moment. The method was thankless and ultimately failed to obtain
enough nominations for party members to run. Now their efforts to seek nominations are
being called a "nuisance." He earlier asked the government to hold a meeting for
candidates and members of the Three Associations, but was rejected again.
He criticized: "Knocking on the door to ask for nominations, they say I'm a nuisance;
sitting here feeling depressed, and saying I don't try my best to find nominations. And they
don't want to hold meetings to listen to our political platform, so why don't you just tell me
directly that you don't let us become candidate for this election?" "
新思維議員狄志遠亦指出今次提名較為困難,曾國衞表示,獲取提名「起碼唔
會容易咗」,因應過去太容易獲取提名而設計,指過往未經任何程序或下「係
人都可以有一定數量提名即可入閘參選」,指很多非愛國愛港人士、未有任何
地區工作經驗人士、純粹在政治氛圍下「喊口號嘅」進入選舉,加之當時有不
良的選舉手法,從而「騙取」議席,因此需要完善選舉制度,落實愛國者治
港,以防止亂象發生,確保「一國兩制」行穩致。
“The Third Side” MP Dick Chi-yuan also pointed out that this time the nomination is
more difficult. Tsang Kwok-wai said that obtaining nomination "will not be easy at least"
because it was designed because it was too easy to obtain nomination in the past. He
pointed out that in the past, "anyone can do it without any procedures or under "You can
enter the election only if you have a certain number of nominations", which refers to the
fact that many people who are not patriotic and patriotic to Hong Kong, and have no
experience in working in the region, entered the election purely by "shouting slogans" in
the political atmosphere. In addition, there were bad election techniques at the time, thus
To "cheat" seats, it is necessary to improve the electoral system and implement patriots
governing Hong Kong to prevent chaos and ensure the stability of "one country, two
systems".
曾國衞重申須在選舉制度確保落實愛國者治港,如提名上需要有能力及可信人
士把關,排除非愛國愛港人士、非地區人士、非真誠為地區工作人士及非有能
力人士;再由資格審查委員會落實是否擁護效忠特區政府人士;及最後宣誓擁
護效忠特區政府,如有違誓則會取消資格。他指重重制度保障可愛國者治港,
形容較以前困難,亦是「理所當然」。他更指如參選者有感獲提名困難是證明
制度發揮應有作用,強調爭取選民信任並非易事,參選者需要「身體力行」,
不但「自己覺得好,仲要人地覺得好」。
曾國衞澄清三會成員提名並非篩選,而是參選者需要獲得其信任,因三會成員
有責任確保參選者愛國愛港、有能力、有志服務社區。又稱參選者需要信任選
舉制度及三會成員,如自己信任立法會議員「正如我信任大家作為立法會議
員,你咃一定係大局為重,唔會相信你係純粹為你哋黨嘅一己私利」至於會否
安排參選者和三會成員見面,他認為現時安排合理,有足夠渠道讓有意參選者
爭取提名。
Tsang Kwok-wai clarified that the nomination of members of the
three associations is not a selection process, but that candidates
need to gain their trust, because members of the three associations
have the responsibility to ensure that candidates love the country
and Hong Kong, are capable and willing to serve the community. It
is also said that candidates need to trust the electoral system and
the members of the three committees. If they trust the members of
the Legislative Council, "Just as I trust you as members of the
Legislative Council, you must have the overall situation in mind and
will not believe that you are purely for your party’s private
interests." As for whether candidates will be arranged to meet with
members of the three committees, Tsang believes that the current
arrangements are reasonable and there are sufficient channels for
interested candidates to seek nominations.
https://www.singtao.ca/6440083/2023-11-06/news-
%E5%8D%80%E8%AD%B0%E6%9C%83%E9%81%B8%E8%88%89%EF%B8%B1%E6%9
E%97%E7%90%B3%E6%8C%87%E4%B8%8A%E9%96%80%E5%8F%A9%E9%96%80%
E5%B0%8B%E4%B8%89%E6%9C%83%E6%8F%90%E5%90%8D%E5%B1%AC%E3%80
%8C%E6%BB%8B%E6%93%BE%E3%80%8D+%E7%94%B0%E5%8C%97%E8%BE%B0%
EF%BC%9A%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%82%E7%9B%B4%E6%8E%A5%E8%A9%B1%E5%94
%94%E4%BF%BE%E9%81%B8%E7%AE%97%E5%95%A6/?variant=zh-hk
accessed at 08/11/2023
Questions:
1. From the above news, What is the nomination mechanism proposed after the
change of electoral system in District Council after 2020? (20%) (word limit:
150 word)
2. What are the differences in the election method before and after the change
of the electoral method around 2020-21? (30%) (word limit: 400 word)
3. What kind of the political system HKSAR (before and after 2020-21) has
according to those political systems you learnt from this course? Why do you
have such judgement? (20%) (word limit: 200 word)
4. What kind of legitimacy does the HKSAR government enjoy if from the
perspective of Weber’s classification of authority? (10%) (word limit: 100
word)
5. To what extent do you agree that the new electoral system can enhance the
legitimacy of the HKSAR representative bodies? (10%) and Why? (10%) (word
limit: 300 word)
END