Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebffiledocnew_889Download full chapter Advances In Manufacturing Production Management And Process Control Proceedings Of The Ahfe 2020 Virtual Conferences On Human Aspects Of Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Production Management And Proce pdf docx
ebffiledocnew_889Download full chapter Advances In Manufacturing Production Management And Process Control Proceedings Of The Ahfe 2020 Virtual Conferences On Human Aspects Of Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Production Management And Proce pdf docx
Advances in
Manufacturing,
Production Management
and Process Control
Proceedings of the AHFE 2020 Virtual
Conferences on Human Aspects
of Advanced Manufacturing, Advanced
Production Management and Process
Control, and Additive Manufacturing,
Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping,
July 16–20, 2020, USA
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume 1216
Series Editor
Janusz Kacprzyk, Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences,
Warsaw, Poland
Advisory Editors
Nikhil R. Pal, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
Rafael Bello Perez, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Computing,
Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba
Emilio S. Corchado, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Hani Hagras, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering,
University of Essex, Colchester, UK
László T. Kóczy, Department of Automation, Széchenyi István University,
Gyor, Hungary
Vladik Kreinovich, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas
at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Chin-Teng Lin, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao
Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
Jie Lu, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology,
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Patricia Melin, Graduate Program of Computer Science, Tijuana Institute
of Technology, Tijuana, Mexico
Nadia Nedjah, Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Rio de Janeiro,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Ngoc Thanh Nguyen , Faculty of Computer Science and Management,
Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław, Poland
Jun Wang, Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering,
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
The series “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” contains publications
on theory, applications, and design methods of Intelligent Systems and Intelligent
Computing. Virtually all disciplines such as engineering, natural sciences, computer
and information science, ICT, economics, business, e-commerce, environment,
healthcare, life science are covered. The list of topics spans all the areas of modern
intelligent systems and computing such as: computational intelligence, soft comput-
ing including neural networks, fuzzy systems, evolutionary computing and the fusion
of these paradigms, social intelligence, ambient intelligence, computational neuro-
science, artificial life, virtual worlds and society, cognitive science and systems,
Perception and Vision, DNA and immune based systems, self-organizing and
adaptive systems, e-Learning and teaching, human-centered and human-centric
computing, recommender systems, intelligent control, robotics and mechatronics
including human-machine teaming, knowledge-based paradigms, learning para-
digms, machine ethics, intelligent data analysis, knowledge management, intelligent
agents, intelligent decision making and support, intelligent network security, trust
management, interactive entertainment, Web intelligence and multimedia.
The publications within “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing” are
primarily proceedings of important conferences, symposia and congresses. They
cover significant recent developments in the field, both of a foundational and
applicable character. An important characteristic feature of the series is the short
publication time and world-wide distribution. This permits a rapid and broad
dissemination of research results.
** Indexing: The books of this series are submitted to ISI Proceedings,
EI-Compendex, DBLP, SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Springerlink **
Waldemar Karwowski •
Massimo Di Nicolantonio •
Emilio Rossi
Editors
Advances in Manufacturing,
Production Management
and Process Control
Proceedings of the AHFE 2020 Virtual
Conferences on Human Aspects of Advanced
Manufacturing, Advanced Production
Management and Process Control,
and Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems
and 3D Prototyping, July 16–20, 2020, USA
123
Editors
Beata Mrugalska Stefan Trzcielinski
Faculty of Engineering Management Poznan University of Technology
Poznan University of Technology Poznan, Poland
Poznan, Poland
Massimo Di Nicolantonio
Waldemar Karwowski Architecture Department
University of Central Florida University of Chieti-Pescara
Winter Park, FL, USA Pescara, Pescara, Italy
Emilio Rossi
Lincoln School of Design
University of Lincoln
Lincoln, UK
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Advances in Human Factors
and Ergonomics 2020
11th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics and the
Affiliated Conferences
v
vi Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics 2020
(continued)
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Salman Nazir, Tareq Ahram and
Education, and Learning Sciences Waldemar Karwowski
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation Neville Stanton
Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Tareq Ahram
Systems Engineering
Advances in Human Factors in Architecture, Jerzy Charytonowicz
Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure
Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Waldemar Karwowski, Ravindra S.
Ergonomics Goonetilleke, Shuping Xiong,
Richard H.M. Goossens and Atsuo
Murata
Advances in Manufacturing, Production Beata Mrugalska, Stefan Trzcielinski,
Management and Process Control Waldemar Karwowski, Massimo Di
Nicolantonio and Emilio Rossi
Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable Tareq Ahram and Christianne Falcão
and Assistive Technology
Advances in Creativity, Innovation, Evangelos Markopoulos, Ravindra S.
Entrepreneurship and Communication of Design Goonetilleke, Amic G. Ho and Yan
Luximon
Preface
vii
viii Preface
E. Ramos, Peru
C. Raymundo, Peru
S. Simani, Italy
Y. Tansel İÇ, Turkey
M. Wyrwicka, Poland
Additive Manufacturing, Modeling Systems and 3D Prototyping
P. Barcarolo, Italy
M. Calvano, Italy
J. Keist, USA
J. Lagatta, Italy
F. Medola, Brazil
R. Narayan, USA
E. Pei, UK
P. Rao, USA
F. Sandnes, Norway
M. Wilson, UK
xi
xii Contents
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license
to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
B. Mrugalska et al. (Eds.): AHFE 2020, AISC 1216, pp. 3–17, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51981-0_1
4 P. Brauner et al.
1 Introduction
1
https://www.iop.rwth-aachen.de/.
A Research Framework for Human Aspects in the IoP 5
If we think of the IoP’s vision and the development of a World-Wide Lab as a platform
with a corresponding business model, different aspects must be considered. Gawer [6]
has dealt with the different perspectives on technological platforms. In her framework,
she analyzed a platform’s so-called “innovation ecosystems” [7, 8] or “ecologies of
complex innovation” [9] that represent the network of firms dealing with technological
platforms in the digital sector. In her research, she detects two theoretical perspectives.
On the one hand, the economic perspective, which focuses on economic considerations
like competition, on the other hand, the engineering perspective, which places focus in
6 P. Brauner et al.
innovation and design [6]. The findings from her analysis are brought together into a
theoretic framework with the goal of developing platforms that “[…] can be usefully
conceptualized as evolving organizations or meta-organizations […]” [6] (p. 1239)
From her point of view, this can be achieved by reflecting the organizational form,
interfaces, capabilities and governance, which are jointly called the “organizational
continuum of technological platforms”.
However, in the frame of Gawer’s [6] analysis it becomes clear that one must pay
particularly close attention to human behavior in a meta-organization. For example,
Gawer [6] points out that “[a]gents’ changing roles within platform-based ecosystems
[…] and associated shifting patterns of collaboration and competition, are in fact a
feature of ecosystems [10], one that ought to be treated explicitly in rigorous attempts
to theorize technological platforms.” (p. 1243). Gawer [6] refers primarily to the role of
companies as organizations and their positioning. However, a closer look also reveals
the need to reflect on the people in an organization as agents of technological platforms.
Especially against the background that technological platforms generally originate from
already existing organizations and systems, the integration of the people, who also act
in these systems but also on the respective platforms, is of special importance. In this
context, psychological aspects of change [11–14] as part of a transformation process
towards a meta-organization need to be reflected.
For this reason, the project presented deals with the research of human acceptance
behavior in the context of the establishment of the IoP. The approach strives for a
holistic perspective on acceptance of a platform environment and implementing the
idea of the IoP into the enterprise.
If reference is made to technology acceptance research, two objectives can be
defined: 1) a better understanding of acceptance phenomena, i.e. the analysis of factors
and mechanisms that promote or impede the emergence of acceptance; 2) results should
contribute towards shaping the introduction and implementation of technology and
technical innovations themselves in such a way that they meet with the greatest pos-
sible acceptance [15, 16]. Research objects are therefore the management level as well
as the employees of organizations that seek to participate in the IoP with the aim to
continuously improve the individual production process.
The presented research approach is based on Gawer’s [6] four-stage “organizational
continuum of technological platforms”. Those four layers - governance, organization,
capabilities, interfaces - represent at the same time the research objects that must be
investigated within the framework of acceptance research. Focusing on the internal
perspective, the acceptance behavior of different target groups is defined on the levels
and investigated w.r.t. specific use cases.
In this chapter, we describe the different research approaches that are taken in the IoP-
research project. The research approaches are oriented towards Gawer’s organizational
continuum of technological platforms and, as a result, focus on aspects of governance,
A Research Framework for Human Aspects in the IoP 7
3.1 Governance
The IoP involves major changes in how workers go about performing their work and in
the way the management organizes the work processes. These changes, besides offering
sizable benefits for businesses, also create ethical challenges. By altering the traditional
working environment, the introduction of the IoP is likely to affect the welfare of the
employees in numerous ways. Two critical issues at stake are the privacy of the
employees and the just allocation of responsibility in contexts that involve autonomous
robots.
Privacy is widely regarded as an essential component of an individual’s wellbeing.
Control over one’s personal information has been suggested to be instrumental, among
other things, to the protection of an individual’s autonomy [17], human dignity [18],
and social integrity [19]. The introduction of the IoP is associated with the collection
and evaluation of large swaths of data about the performance of employees, potentially
threatening their privacy and the values privacy protects. Part of our project is therefore
to determine the extent to which workplace surveillance is ethically justifiable [20]. We
seek to identify a fair balance between employees’ legitimate claim to privacy and
businesses’ equally legitimate attempt to render production processes more efficient
and profitable. The fairness of any data collection policy will depend, among other
things, on 1) whose data are collected, 2) what kind of data are collected, 3) how long
the data are stored, 4) who has access to these data, 5) whether the data are processed
by a computer or a human agent, 6) what the data are used for, and 7) on how
transparent the data collection policy is.
The introduction of robots in the work process constitutes another potential source
of ethical concern. While robots in the workplace can bring about an increase in
productivity, they raise questions regarding the attribution of responsibility. This is
8 P. Brauner et al.
especially true if work robots are equipped with artificial intelligence that provide them
with a certain degree of autonomy. The use of autonomous robots may lead to a moral
muddying of the waters, making it difficult to assign responsibility in case of a mishap
or accident. In such a situation, it may not always seem obvious whom to hold
accountable – the operator/worker, the management, the programmer of the algorithm,
the manufacturer of the robot, or the robot itself. This has led some scholars to speak of
a ‘responsibility gap’ [21], resulting directly from the autonomy of intelligent robots.
Businesses that introduce the IoP must therefore at an early stage adopt a fair and
transparent scheme of responsibility attribution, which is acceptable to all stakeholders.
Due to the novelty of the problem, it may be necessary to rethink our traditional ethical
practices of responsibility allocation and to adapt them to an environment that includes
autonomous systems.
3.2 Organization
The implementation of the IoP vision in existing corporate structures requires a change
at different levels. The reasons to initiate a change are manifold. In a study conducted
with 3,199 executives from industries and regions worldwide, the researchers asked for
the reasons for change [22]. With regard to the question which overarching objective
was pursued by the company in the frame of the transformation, 35% answered
“Moving from good performance to great performance”, 15% of respondents stated,
“Reducing costs” and 12% indicated the need for “Turning around a crisis situation”.
Despite the important entrepreneurial intentions to initiate a change (such as, for
example, the digitalization of a company), change projects fail. The risk of failure while
establishing and securing organizational changes is between 40% and 70% [23, 24].
Reasons for that can be seen in the psychological effects of changes, and resulting fear
and reactance [25].
Within the context of change, acceptance is an important aspect and needs to be
reflected on all company levels. While Sauer et al. [26] define an unacceptance-
acceptance-scale which leads in 8 steps from active opposition as the highest form of
unacceptance over indifference and tolerance to engagement as the highest form of
acceptance, Müllerleile [27] points out that in practice the silent form of unacceptance
is problematic as it is not obviously recognizable. Conversely this means that chal-
lenges regarding acceptance of implementing operating processes can exist in an
organization even though there is no recognizable active opposition [27]. In this
context, the psychological effect of a change on employees at all levels of a company
plays an important role.
Regarding the IoP project outlined above, it is therefore of particular importance to
reflect on attitudes, opinions and possible reactances before integrating an appropriate
system in order to be able to link them up within the framework of a change man-
agement approach. For this reason, on the one hand an investigation of behavioral
aspects of acceptance as well as prevailing mindsets in the digitalization context is
necessary, on the other hand structural barriers and organizational framework condi-
tions must be analyzed in order for being able to develop appropriate implementation
concepts.
A Research Framework for Human Aspects in the IoP 9
3.3 Interfaces
For the implementation of the vision of the IoP at the various stages of manufacturing
companies (from shop floor operation to strategic planning), new human-machine
interfaces are needed that facilitate the viability of the socio-technical production
system [28]. The successful development, implementation, and use of these novel tools
and interfaces, needs an understanding of both, what future interfaces in production
systems are, and which specific requirements future employees have. We expect that
the diversity of production yields a variety of different user-, context-, and task-
adaptive (combination of) interfaces. Examples are new forms of human-robot col-
laboration, smart AI-driven decision support systems at the shop floor, or tightly
integrated data-driven dashboards and decision simulations for the strategic production
planning.
In the context of human-robot collaboration the elimination of the border between
robots and operators enables seamless and tightly coupled interaction; promising the
optimal combination of both actors’ capabilities. Smart AI-driven decision support
systems for the shop floor level or for strategic planning need adequate information
aggregation and visualizations to make very large volumes and varieties of data from
production accessible, transparent, and actionable.
Considering the human side, it is essential to consider prior research on automation
research. For example, Parasaruman et al. found that people interact differently with
automated systems, based on user, system, and interaction features. They defined three
different forms of interaction: Use, misuse, and disuse [29]. Use refers to the adequate
usage of an automated system, misuse signifies the nonreflected usage of the system,
e.g., by not checking if the automation works correctly. Disuse denotes to the inten-
tional neglect of automated decision aids due to, e.g., missing trust in automation.
Furthermore, they defined abuse of automation as an organizational aspect, where
automation is implemented by superiors and managers without considering the fit
between automation, the context, and the operators.
On this basis, prior research identified various human, interface, and system factors
that influence efficiency and trust in automation (cf. [30]). However, new forms of
automation must be specifically tailored to the operators, the context, and the task to
generate high utility, trust, and user satisfaction. On the contrary, if interfaces of
automated systems are not designed well, this may negatively impact production
performance (e.g., quality, efficiency, costs, …), the company (e.g., cohesion, autop-
oiesis, economic viability, …) and the individuals (e.g., autonomy, stress, job satis-
faction, …).
In the IoP we study novel human-machine interfaces in different use cases (see
below). In particular, we will analyze which design factors (interface design and
visualizations, support systems and their comprehensiveness, explainability, and
transparency) yield higher utility, acceptance, and trust in automated systems.
10 P. Brauner et al.
3.4 Capabilities
Based on the agents and relevant entities in socio-technical production systems, our
research framework operationalizes capabilities in relation to humans, machines (+data
processing), organization and society. For each of the four aspects we have to examine
the baseline capabilities and the expansion potential. Thus, in the context of humans,
we have to consider their cognitive and motor capabilities as well as their specific
dispositions e.g. to trust in automation, personality states and traits, or technology
acceptance. By operationalizing human factors, their fit, potential and advantage in the
socio-technical system can be applied and matched with the other agents to foster
emergence within the socio-technical systems. Besides the human capabilities, the
technological capabilities within a company must be also taken into account. Tech-
nological capabilities are the technological infrastructure of cyber-physical production
systems e.g., machines, software, algorithms or AI applications of a company.
In the IoP, it is essential not only to consider the specific capabilities of different
agents (e.g., technical and human), but to integrate these into a holistic concept. Novel
concepts and approaches from production engineering, computer science, and data
science (such as Data Lakes, Digital Shadows, or the Lab of Labs) need to be integrated
with specific sensory, motoric, and cognitive skills and procedural and contextual
expertise of humans. Only this multi-agent integration yields the emergence of
advanced capabilities which are required to harness the full potential of digitalization in
production. In order for the full potential of capabilities to unfold, suitable interfaces
between the agents in the IoP, as well as appropriate governance and organizational
structures are required.
Joint-cognitive systems that combine the capabilities of experts with smart agents
(data analytics, artificial intelligence, decision support systems) need humane interfaces
that provide trusted, interpretable, and actionable user- and context-adaptive informa-
tion for the human operator. Additionally, these interfaces must capture the knowledge
of human operators to enhance the system’s future knowledge base.
4 Use Cases
The challenges, which were described within the four aspects governance, organiza-
tion, interfaces and capabilities, are addressed by analyzing the specific use cases
Corporate Organizational Structures, Global Production Control, Assistance Systems in
Textile Composite Production and Human-Robot Collaboration in Assembly by the
project team (see Fig. 1). The following subsections briefly describe which aspects are
addressed by the individual use cases.
A Research Framework for Human Aspects in the IoP 11
Non-persistent
Legal aspects for
performance evaluation
implementation of the IoP
of workers
handover process a new human-machine interface, which allows the human to control
the robot implicitly, is implemented. The individual needs of the users should be
considered during its development in order to achieve trust in automation and a high
level of acceptance. By predicting the duration of assembly steps, the capability of real
time updates concerning the estimated task finish time is enabled, which can be used in
a dynamic rescheduling of production tasks. The goal of this development is to achieve
a match between the capabilities of the human to work with this robot and the capa-
bilities of the robot, in order to create a system that offers a high degree of adaptability
and at the same time achieves acceptance and considers usability. Therefore, studies are
conducted to analyze the acceptance of the adaptive human-robot collaboration in
assembly.
Fig. 3. Handover process in the collaborative assembly scenario. (Picture: Ahrens + Steinbach
Projekte)
In this contribution, we have outlined how the IoP may reshape production and
illustrated that people are likely to remain essential in socio-technical production
systems. We have further hypothesized that, in order to unfold its full capabilities, the
development and implementation of new production technologies must be harmonized
with human requirements, and outlined a concept for the related research. These human
requirements are linked to the areas governance, which includes data security and
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
regularity:—varying their phases from full to new and from new to
full, and frequently eclipsing the sun and each other, at least to the
equatorial parts of Jupiter; and almost in every revolution suffering
eclipses themselves by falling into Jupiter’s shadow; excepting that
the outermost will seem, like a traveller fond of the sun-beams,
cautiously to avoid the shadow for whole years together. Since we
are advanced so far, if not tired of the journey, let us proceed a step
further; it is but 400 millions of miles to the globe of Saturn. Here
again all will be lost, but Jupiter itself. The Sun will put on something
of a starlike appearance, but with excessive brightness. The five[A33]
satellites of Saturn will exhibit appearances similar to those of
Jupiter, but they will very rarely eclipse the Sun, or suffer eclipses
themselves. The particular phænomena of Saturn’s ring, we cannot
explain, unless we knew the time and plane of Saturn’s revolution on
his axis. But this we know, that it must sometimes appear, by night,
like a prodigious luminous arch, almost equal to one quarter of the
heavens; and at other times, dark, so as to afford no light itself, but
to intercept the light of every star beyond it, by night, and of the sun
itself by day. And to conclude, if borne on the wings of a comet we
should travel with it to the remotest part of its orbit; our whole
planetary system would disappear, and the sun become a star, only
more refulgent than Sirius perhaps, because less distant.
The opinion of the earth’s rotation on its axis was once violently
opposed, from a notion of its dangerous tendency with respect to the
interests of religion:[A34] But, as truth is always consistent with itself,
so many new proofs were furnished from time to time by new
discoveries, that a mistaken interpretation of some passages in the
bible was compelled to give way to the force of astronomical
evidence. The doctrine of a plurality of worlds, is inseparable from
the principles of Astronomy; but this doctrine is still thought, by some
pious persons, and by many more I fear, who do not deserve that
title, to militate against the truths asserted by the Christian religion. If
I may be allowed to give my opinion on a matter of such importance,
I must confess that I think upon a proper examination the apparent
inconsistency will vanish. Our religion teaches us what philosophy
could not have taught; and we ought to admire with reverence the
great things it has pleased divine Providence to perform, beyond the
ordinary course of Nature, for man, who is undoubtedly the most
noble inhabitant of this globe. But neither religion nor philosophy
forbids us to believe that infinite wisdom and power, prompted by
infinite goodness, may throughout the vast extent of creation and
duration, have frequently interposed in a manner quite
incomprehensible to us, when it became necessary to the happiness
of created beings of some other rank or degree.
How far indeed the inhabitants of the other planets may resemble
man, we cannot pretend to say. If like him they were created liable to
fall, yet some, if not all of them, may still retain their original
rectitude. We will hope they do: the thought is comfortable.—Cease,
Galileo, to improve thy optic tube: and thou, great Newton, forbear
thy ardent search into the distant mysteries of nature: lest ye make
unwelcome discoveries. Deprive us not of the pleasure of believing
that yonder radiant orbs, traversing in silent majesty the etherial
regions, are the peaceful seats of innocence and bliss: where neither
natural nor moral evil has ever yet intruded; where to enjoy with
gratitude and adoration the creator’s bounty, is the business of
existence. If their inhabitants resemble man in their faculties and
affections, let us suppose that they are wise enough to govern
themselves according to the dictates of that reason their creator has
given them, in such manner as to consult their own and each other’s
true happiness, on all occasions. But if, on the contrary, they have
found it necessary to erect artificial fabrics of government, let us not
suppose that they have done it with so little skill, and at such an
enormous expence, as must render them a misfortune instead of a
blessing. We will hope that their statesmen are patriots, and that
their kings, if that order of beings has found admittance there, have
the feelings of humanity.—Happy people! and perhaps more happy
still, that all communication with us is denied. We have neither
corrupted you with our vices, nor injured you by violence. None of
your sons and daughters, degraded from their native dignity, have
been doomed to endless slavery by us in America, merely because
their bodies may be disposed to reflect or absorb the rays of light, in
a way different from ours. Even you, inhabitants of the moon,
situated in our very neighbourhood, are effectually secured, alike
from the rapacious hand of the haughty Spaniard, and of the
unfeeling British nabob. Even British thunder impelled by British
thirst of gain, cannot reach you: And the utmost efforts of the mighty
Frederick, that tyrant of the north and scourge of mankind, if aimed
to disturb your peace, becomes inconceivably ridiculous and
impotent.
Pardon these reflections; they rise not from the gloomy spirit of
misanthropy. That being, before whose piercing eye all the intricate
foldings and dark recesses of the human heart become expanded
and illuminated, is my witness with what sincerity, with what ardor, I
wish for the happiness of the whole race of mankind: how much I
admire that disposition of lands and seas, which affords a
communication between distant regions, and a mutual exchange of
benefits:[A35] how sincerely I approve of those social refinements
which really add to our happiness, and induce us with gratitude to
acknowledge our great Creator’s goodness:—how I delight in a
participation of the discoveries made from time to time in nature’s
works, by our Philosophic brethren in Europe.
But when I consider, that luxury and her constant follower tyranny,
who have long since laid in the dust, never to rise again, the glories
of Asia, are now advancing like a torrent irresistible, whose weight
no human force can stem, and have nearly completed their conquest
of Europe; luxury and tyranny, who by a vile affectation of virtues
they know not, pretend at first to be the patrons of science and
philosophy, but at length fail not effectually to destroy them; agitated
I say by these reflections, I am ready to wish—vain wish! that nature
would raise her everlasting bars between the new and old world; and
make a voyage to Europe as impracticable as one to the moon. I
confess indeed, that by our connections with Europe we have made
most surprising, I had almost said unnatural, advances towards the
meridian of glory; but by those connections too, in all probability, our
fall will be premature. May the God of knowledge inspire us with
wisdom to prevent it: let our harbours, our doors, our hearts, be shut
against luxury. But I return to my subject, and will no longer indulge
these melancholy thoughts.
If the time would permit, how agreeable the task to dwell on the
praises of Astronomy: to consider its happy effects as a science, on
the human mind. Let the sceptical writers forbear to lavish
encomiums on their cobweb Philosophy, liable to be broken by the
smallest incident in nature. They tell us it is of great service to
mankind, in banishing bigotry and superstition from amongst us. Is
not this effectually done by Astronomy? The direct tendency of this
science is to dilate the heart with universal benevolence, and to
enlarge its views. But then it does this without propagating a single
point of doctrine contrary to common sense, or the most cultivated
reason. It flatters no fashionable princely vice, or national depravity.
It encourages not the libertine by relaxing any of the precepts of
morality; nor does it attempt to undermine the foundations of religion.
It denies none of those attributes, which the wisest and best of
mankind, have in all ages ascribed to the Deity: Nor does it degrade
the human mind from that dignity, which is ever necessary to make it
contemplate itself with complacency. None of these things does
Astronomy pretend to; and if these things merit the aim of
Philosophy, and the encouragement of a people, then let scepticism
flourish, and Astronomy lie neglected; then let the names of
Berkeley, and Hume, become immortal, and that of Newton be lost in
oblivion.
I now come, in the last place, to point out some of the defects of
Astronomy at this day. Which I am induced to undertake by the
hopes I entertain that some of those defects may be removed under
the auspices of this society, and of you my fellow citizens, who have
so zealously promoted its institution. “The advantages arising from
Astronomy, the pleasure attending the study of it, the care with which
it was cultivated by many great men among the ancients, and the
extraordinary attention paid to it in Europe by the present age,” all
contribute to recommend it to your protection, under which we have
the best reason to expect that it will flourish.
And I trust there will not be wanting men of genius, to arise in this
new world, whose talents may be particularly adapted to
astronomical enquiries. Indeed I am persuaded that nature is by no
means so nigardly in producing them, as we are apt to imagine.
Some are never tempted forth from obscurity, some are untimely
snatched away by death, a striking instance whereof we have in
Horrox; and many are accidentally led to other pursuits.
The Astronomy of comets is still in its infancy; not that the
attention of the learned and ingenious has at all been wanting for
more than a century past; but because it will necessarily require
many ages to bring it to perfection. I wish we were in a condition to
promote it in some degree, by carefully observing such comets as
may appear. As yet we scarce dare affirm that any one has or will
return a second time. It has never, that I know of, been certainly
proved by observation, that a comet has descended within a
parabolic orbit, and until that is done we have only a coincidence of
periods and orbits (none of which have been very precise) to depend
on for their return. Far less are astronomers able to determine the
changes that may, and probably do, happen in their orbits[A36] and
velocities in every period, so as to predict their nearer or more
remote approach to the earth or any planet. Whether their business
be to repair or destroy, whether they are worlds yet in formation or
once habitable worlds in ruins; whether they are at present habitable
and regular attendants of our Sun only, or whether they are the vast
links that connect the distant parts of creation by surrounding more
suns than one, we know not.
The orbits of the primary planets have at one time been supposed
moveable with various irregularities, at other times fixed and
permanent. It seems now generally granted, that according to the
theory of gravity they must change their situations; yet not long
since, some great astronomers warmly contended that this change
was altogether insensible.
According to the best tables we now have, the planes of the orbits
of Jupiter, the Earth and Mercury are immoveable, though the orbits
themselves have a progressive motion in their planes. On the
contrary, the poles of the orbits of Saturn, Mars and Venus are
supposed to revolve about the poles of the earth’s orbit, with such
velocities as at present nearly reconcile calculation to appearances.
But there is good reason to apprehend that such a supposition is not
true in fact, and a mistake in this matter will have some important
consequences. More probable is it, that the poles of the orbits of all
the planets, the earth not excepted, revolve about some common
centre. The several quantities of these motions, I am confident, are
to be had from observation, and not from theory alone. If such a
motion of the earth’s orbit be admitted, it will account for the
diminution[A37] of the obliquity of the ecliptic; which seems now
incontestible; and that in whatever manner we divide the forces
producing such motion, amongst the two superior planets and
Venus, or even amongst all of them. And I should suspect the further
diminution of obliquity, from this cause, will amount to about one
degree and an half.
In the year 1672 and 1676 Cassini saw a small star near Venus,
which he thought might be a satellite attending on her. It appeared to
have the same phase with Venus. In 1740 Mr. Short with a telescope
of 16 inches saw a small star at the distance of ten minutes from
Venus, which from its apparent shape he likewise thought might be a
satellite. And in 1761 Mr. Montaigne, in France, saw what he took to
be the satellite of Venus, on the 3d, 4th, 7th and 11th of May.[A39] But
whether Venus has a satellite or not, must still be left amongst the
doubtful things of Astronomy.
The diurnal rotations of Saturn and Mercury are yet unknown; but
when further improvements shall be made in the art of using
telescopes, this circumstance will hardly escape the vigilance of
astronomers.
These are a few of the many things that are still left to the industry
of the ingenious in this science.
But if all higher and more sublime discoveries are not reserved for
us in a future and more perfect state; if Astronomy shall again break
those limits that now seem to confine it, and expatiate freely in the
superior celestial fields; what amazing discoveries may yet be made
amongst the fixed stars! That grand phænomenon the Milky-Way
seems to be the clue that will one day guide us. Millions of small
stars compose it, and many more bright ones lie in and near it, than
in other parts of heaven. Is not this a strong indication that this
astonishing system of worlds beyond worlds innumerable, is not
alike extended every way, but confined between two parallel planes,
of immeasureable, though not infinite extent? Or rather, is not the
Milky-Way a vein of a closer texture, running through this part of the
material creation? Great things are sometimes best explained by
small and small by great. Material substances, such as we daily
handle, have been thought composed of impenetrable particles in
actual contact: then again it has seemed necessary to suppose them
at a distance from each other, and kept in their relative situations by
attraction and repulsion. Many appearances require that those
distances should be very great in proportion to the size of the
particles. Hence some, with no small reason, have concluded that
matter consists of indivisible points endued with certain powers. Let
us compare these smaller portions of it with that great aggregate of
matter which is the object of Astronomy; Light will then appear to
have as free passage through a piece of glass, as the comets have
in the planetary regions; and several other new considerations will
arise.
Were we even assured that we shall perish like the flowers of the
garden, how careful would a wise man be to preserve a good
conscience, during the short period of his existence; because by his
very constitution, which he cannot alter, this is his pride and glory,
and absolutely necessary to his present happiness; because this
would insure to him at the approach of death, the soothing reflection,
that he was going to restore, pure and uncorrupted, that drop of
divinity within him, to the original ocean from whence it was
separated. How much more anxiously careful ought we to be, if we
believe, as powerful arguments compel us to believe, that a conduct
in this life depending on our own choice, will stamp our characters
for ages yet to come. Who can endure the thought of darkening his
faculties by an unworthy application of them here on earth, and
degrading himself to some inferior rank of being, wherein he may
find both his power and inclination to obtain wisdom and exercise
virtue, exceedingly diminished? On the other hand, if that humble
admiration and gratitude, which sometimes rises in our minds when
we contemplate the power, wisdom and goodness of the Deity,
constitutes by far the most sublimely happy moments of our lives,
and probably will forever continue to do so, there cannot be a
stronger incitement to the exercise of virtue and a rational
employment of those talents we are entrusted with, than to consider
that by these means we shall in a few years be promoted to a more
exalted rank amongst the creatures of God, have our understandings
greatly enlarged, be enabled to follow truth in all her labyrinths with a
higher relish and more facility, and thus lay the foundation of an
eternal improvement in knowledge and happiness.
It appears from the whole of the observations, that, of all the stars,
Arcturus is carried with the greatest celerity, by his own motion,
westward; since the same attendant, which in Flamstead’s time, on
the 14th of February, 1690, preceded Arcturus 5″ in time, now enters
the meridian 6″ after him. From the diminished difference also, of
declination between Arcturus and his attendant, it is evident, that
Arcturus progresses annually, by his own appropriate motion, nearly
2″ in a circular course, towards the south. From this it clearly results,
that the declination of the attendant, as observed by me, reduced to
the parallel of Greenwich, produces the same altitude of the
Greenwich pole, as that deduced from Flamstead’s observation; but
not so, the declination of Arcturus, observed at the present day, even
with the aberration and nutation corrected.
Christian Mayer,
Astronomer to his Serene Highness the Elector
Palatine and Duke of Bavaria.
Manheim, in Germany, April 24, 1778.
Sir,
This country having been the seat of war, our meetings have been
interrupted for two years past, and the publication of a second
volume thereby prevented; but as the Society is again revived, and
we have materials for the purpose, it will not be much longer
delayed.
Gentlemen,
If a ball of earth, weighing 200 pounds, were left at liberty near the
surface of this globe, it would descend, by its own gravity, about 15
feet in one second of time, and about 20 miles in 80 seconds: And if,
as this gentleman supposes, there are about 2000 trillions of such
balls in the whole Earth,—the Earth, by their mutual attractions, in 80
seconds of time; will move toward the ball 1/1736,000,000,000,000
of an inch; and if the same force were to act continually for 105
years, it would move about one inch. Therefore, the force wherewith
a man acts, when he lifts a weight of 200 pounds, if applied without
intermission for the space of 105 years, is sufficient, without any
machinery, to move the Earth one inch in that time;[A42] and it must,
from the velocity received by that force alone, continue for ever after
to move at the rate of one inch in about 50 years.
A Mechanic.
Dear Brother,
The first remark is no doubt just, and is perhaps the only one
made, which Mr. Wood’s essay gave just occasion for; how he could
commit such a mistake, is not easy to conceive. But the remarker
immediately charges him with another: for he tells us, that he (Mr.
Wood I suppose) says, that Mr. Harrison’s Machines were finished
about Christmas 1765; whereas his father (whether Wood’s father or
Harrison’s, is not clear,) made three, which the remarker saw in
motion about 18 years since. He then proceeds to assure us, (by the
spirit of prophecy I presume, at least I cannot conceive how he could
come by this piece of knowledge in a natural way,) that neither the
father or his son will ever be able to finish their machines.
* * * * * * * * * *
David Rittenhouse.
Dr. Rittenhouse’s Chronometer.
The construction of this Time-piece is thus described by Mr. Henry Voight, chief
coiner in the Mint, heretofore an eminent clock and watch maker in
Philadelphia; an artist of great ingenuity, and well known for the excellence of
his workmanship. The description is given in Mr. Voight’s own words.
“On the rod of the pendulum there is fixed a glass tube, of the
thickness of a strong thermometer-tube, and is in the whole as long
as the rod: but it is bent, about one-third upwards; like a barometer,
but longer; and upon that end, on the top, the tube is as wide again
as it is below, for about one-and-an-half inch in length: the other two-
thirds of the length is filled with spirits of wine; and at this end, the
tube is hermetically sealed. The shorter part is filled with mercury, so
high as to fill the widest part of it, about half an inch, and is not
sealed but remains open. The bend is close together, and there is no
more space between the tubes than three-eighths of an inch.