Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artificial Intelligence-A Paradigm Shift in Health Care Management
Artificial Intelligence-A Paradigm Shift in Health Care Management
Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gradually changing the practice of surgery with the
advanced technological development of imaging, navigation, and robotic intervention. In this
article, the recent successful and influential applications of AI in medicine are reviewed from
preoperative planning and intra-operative guidance to the integration of surgical robots. We
end with summarizing the current state, emerging trends, and significant challenges in the
future development of AI in surgery. Robotic surgery is the use of computer technologies
working in conjunction with robot systems to perform medical procedures. The technology is
also known as computer-aided surgery and robot-assisted surgery. Robotic surgery, or robot-
assisted surgery, allows doctors to perform many types of complex processes with more
precision, flexibility, and control than is possible with conventional techniques. Robotic
surgery is usually associated with minimally invasive surgery procedures performed through
tiny incisions. It is also sometimes used in specific traditional open surgical procedures. The
Food and Drug Administration approved robotic surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System
in 2000. "The technique has been rapidly adopted by hospitals in the United States and
Europe for use in the treatment of a wide range of conditions. The most widely used clinical
robotic surgical system includes a camera arm and mechanical arms with surgical instruments
attached to them. The surgeon controls the arms while seated at a computer console near the
operating table. The console gives the surgeon a high-definition, magnified, 3-D view of the
surgical site. The surgeon leads other team members who assist during the operation".
Research Objective
This paper reviews the critical capabilities of AI to help surgeons understand and
critically evaluate new AI applications and to contribute to new developments in the field of
Neuro Surgery.
Subfields in AI
AI's roots are found across multiple fields, including robotics, philosophy, psychology,
linguistics, and statistics. Significant advances in computer science, such as improvements in
processing speed and power, have functioned as a catalyst to allow for the base technologies
required for the advent of AI. The growing popularity of AI across many different industries
has attracted venture capital investment up to $5 billion in 2016 alone. Much of the current
attention on AI has focused on the four core subfields introduced below.
AI in seizure disorders
A machine learning approach to predict the outcome of epilepsy surgery, based on supervised
classification and data mining, taking into account not only the standard clinical variables but
also the pathological and neuropsychological evaluations, is now available. The outcome
could be predicted with an accuracy of almost 90% using some clinical and
neuropsychological features(Senova S,2018). Importantly, not all the elements were needed
to perform the prediction. Automatic seizure detection using scalp electroencephalogram
(EEG) and advanced artificial intelligence techniques have been reported following pre-
processing with filtering and artifact removal(Harris, J. J.,2012).
AI in the Neurosurgical OT
It is now accepted that brain tumors cause substantial reorganization of functional
systems. "AI-assisted functional registration exhibits higher predictive power than anatomical
registration(Vassileva, A.,2018). Functional localization of activated but displaced regions is
necessary, particularly in cases where tumor-induced changes of the haemodynamics make
direct localization difficult. Matching functional brain regions across individuals is
challenging, largely due to variability in their location and extent. The addition of pathology
can cause substantial reorganization of functional systems. Advances in neural information
processing systems using AI addresses these issues" (Fomenko, A., & Serletis, D. (2018).
AI in Neuro-Oncology
Current machine learning techniques provide the opportunity to develop non-invasive
and automated glioma grading tools, utilizing quantitative parameters derived from multi-
modal MRI data. Zhang et al. reported a classification accuracy of over 90%, which is more
than that of an experienced neuro-radiologist(Evangelista, E.,2015). "Prediction models based
on data-mining and machine-learning algorithms have provided a much more accurate
prediction of prognosis in malignant gliomas than is possible using histopathologic
classification alone. Fully automated enhanced tumor compartmentalization was compared
with semi-automatic segmentation done by four experts. Though feasible, the results were
similar and took a long time(Duun-Henriksen, J.,2012). The use of machine learning
algorithms along with the extraction of relevant features from MRI images and MR
spectroscopy holds the promise of replacing conventional invasive methods of tumor
classification".
Figure 2
Among the medical disciplines, neurosurgery has been one of the most to benefit from
AI-driven technological innovations. In particular, the subspecialty of stereotactic and
functional Neuro-surgery has seen an explosion of research concerning ways to intelligently
automate the diagnosis and treatment of movement-related disorders and
epilepsy(Winters,2012). Critical neurosurgical applications of AI include robot-assisted
surgery, automated preoperative planning, diagnostic brain imaging classification, surgical
candidate selection, prediction of postoperative patient outcomes, and localization of epileptic
zones within the brain(Dorfer, C.,2017). Robotic neurosurgery is the first innovation that will
be examined in detail here and deals with the challenges of improving the accuracy, speed,
and safety of minimally-invasive targeting of deep brain regions(senders,2018). Second, the
role of machine learning (ML) in analyzing the brain's electrical activity will be presented,
with the goal of smarter diagnosis and more individualized therapy for disorders such as
Parkinson's Disease and epilepsy. Finally, the challenges of deploying AI into the operating
room will be examined, with a focus on ethical and practical implications.
Current Applications
ANNs within medicine currently fit into three categories:
Diagnosis
Prognosis
Outcome prediction
Disc herniation
Brain tumors
Epilepsy
Trauma
Cerebral vasospasm
Figure 3
Figure 4
Conclusion
Neurosurgical robots and machine learning algorithms have the potential to save surgeons
time, streamline complex procedures, and deliver more individualized treatment to the
patient. Future study designs should assess the performance of clinical experts alone versus
AI-assisted therapies to determine whether patient outcomes benefit prospectively. As with
any new technology, graded and cautious incorporation guided by preclinical studies and
strong ethical principles is necessary.
References
1. Winters, B., Custer, J., Galvagno, S. M., Colantuoni, E., Kapoor, S. G., Lee, H., ... &
Newman-Toker, D. (2012). Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review
of autopsy studies. BMJ quality & safety, 21(11), 894-902.
2. Senders, J. T., Arnaout, O., Karhade, A. V., Dasenbrock, H. H., Gormley, W. B.,
Broekman, M. L., & Smith, T. R. (2018). Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a
systematic review. Neurosurgery, 83(2), 181-192.
3. Serletis, D., & Pait, T. G. (2016). Early craniometric tools as a predecessor to
neurosurgical stereotaxis. Journal of neurosurgery, 124(6), 1867-1874.
4. Fomenko, A., & Serletis, D. (2018). Robotic stereotaxy in cranial neurosurgery: a
qualitative systematic review. Neurosurgery, 83(4), 642-650.
5. Shigeki Yokoi, & Takami Yasuda. (1993). Computer Graphics (III/End). The Institute of
Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 76(6), 626-633.
6. Rivkin, M. A., & Yocom, S. S. (2014). Thoracolumbar instrumentation with CT-guided
navigation (O-arm) in 270 consecutive patients: accuracy rates and lessons
learned. Neurosurgical Focus, 36(3), E7.
7. Gonzalez-Martinez, J., FAANS, M. P., Vadera, S., Mullin, J., Enatsu, R., Alexopoulos,
A., ... & Najm, I. Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Laser Ablation in Medically Intractable
Epilepsy: Operative.
8. Dorfer, C., Minchev, G., Czech, T., Stefanits, H., Feucht, M., Pataraia, E., ... &
Wolfsberger, S. (2017). A novel miniature robotic device for frameless implantation of depth
electrodes in refractory epilepsy. Journal of neurosurgery, 126(5), 1622-1628.
9. Li, H., Luan, Y., Hong, F., & Li, Y. (2002). Statistical methods for analysis of time course
gene expression data. Frontiers in Bioscience, 7, a90-a98.
10. Vakharia, V. N., Sparks, R., O'Keeffe, A. G., Rodionov, R., Miserocchi, A., McEvoy,
A., ... & Duncan, J. (2017). Accuracy of intracranial electrode placement for
stereoelectroencephalography: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Epilepsia, 58(6), 921-
932.
11. Lin, C. C., Lin, H. C., Lee, W. Y., Lee, S. T., & Wu, C. T. (2017). Neurosurgical robotic
arm drilling navigation system. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer
Assisted Surgery, 13(3), e1790.
12. Maddison, D. S. A. H. C., & Graves, N. K. I. D. A. Mastering the game of Go with Deep
Neural Networks & Tree Search.
13. Bidiwala, S., & Pittman, T. (2004). Neural network classification of pediatric posterior
fossa tumors using clinical and imaging data. Pediatric neurosurgery, 40(1), 8-15.
14. Duun-Henriksen, J., Kjaer, T. W., Madsen, R. E., Remvig, L. S., Thomsen, C. E., &
Sorensen, H. B. D. (2012). Channel selection for automatic seizure detection. Clinical
Neurophysiology, 123(1), 84-92.
15. Evangelista, E., Bénar, C., Bonini, F., Carron, R., Colombet, B., Régis, J., & Bartolomei,
F. (2015). Does the thalamo-cortical synchrony play a role in seizure termination?. Frontiers
in Neurology, 6, 192.
16. Vassileva, A., van Blooijs, D., Leijten, F., & Huiskamp, G. (2018). Neocortical electrical
stimulation for epilepsy: Closed-loop versus open-loop. Epilepsy research, 141, 95-101.
17. Harris, J. J., Jolivet, R., & Attwell, D. (2012). Synaptic energy use and
supply. Neuron, 75(5), 762 777.
18. Senova S, Chaillet A, Lozano AM. Fornical Closed-Loop Stimulation for Alzheimer's
Disease. Trends Neurosci. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.015.
19. Beudel, M. (2016). Adaptive Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. In Closed Loop
Neuroscience (pp. 213-222).
20. Little, S., Beudel, M., Zrinzo, L., Foltynie, T., Limousin, P., Hariz, M., ... & Aziz, T. Z.
(2016). Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson's disease. Journal
of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 87(7), 717-721.