Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Reading and Using The Thesis, The Reader Understands and Agrees To The Following Terms
By Reading and Using The Thesis, The Reader Understands and Agrees To The Following Terms
By reading and using the thesis, the reader understands and agrees to the following terms:
1. The reader will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the
use of the thesis.
2. The reader will use the thesis for the purpose of research or private study only and not for
distribution or further reproduction or any other purpose.
3. The reader agrees to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss,
damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized
usage.
IMPORTANT
If you have reasons to believe that any materials in this thesis are deemed not suitable to be
distributed in this form, or a copyright owner having difficulty with the material being included in
our database, please contact lbsys@polyu.edu.hk providing details. The Library will look into
your claim and consider taking remedial action upon receipt of the written requests.
Pao Yue-kong Library, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
http://www.lib.polyu.edu.hk
CHEMOSELECTIVE CYSTEINE
MODIFICATION OF PEPTIDES AND
PROTEINS USING 1H-ISOINDOLIUM-
O WA YI
MPhil
Deficient Allenes
O Wa Yi
September 2020
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, it reproduces no material previously published or written, nor material that
has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma, except where due
_______________________
O WA YI
I
ABSTRACT
modification strategies with high selectivity and efficiency under mild reaction
conditions. Cysteine with low abundance and high nucleophilicity is an ideal residue
for selective modification. A novel approach for cysteine modification of peptides and
based 1,6-diyne has been developed for the synthesis of a new class of spiro 1H-
isoindoliums 3. Upon treatment with base, the alkyne moieties of 1H-isoindoliums were
were compatible with this modification and the modified products were stable towards
II
Based on the success of this newly developed cysteine modification method, a one-
step procedure for preparation of electron deficient allene reagents for bioconjugation
stock solutions of in situ generated electron deficient allene reagents with high stability
peptides could proceed with high efficiency up to 99% conversion in 4 h and the
performance was comparable with the isolated allene reagents. The in situ generated
allene reagents could be further applied to protein modification and labeling. The results
demonstrated that this approach could serve as an alternative method for preparation of
allene reagents and be utilized in the newly developed cysteine modification using
electron-deficient allenes.
III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
for his supervision, support and encouragement as well as invaluable advices for my
Yan Karen Kung, Dr. Jian-Fang Cui, Mr. Bin Yang, Mr. Jie-Ren Deng, Mr. Jia-Jun
Jiang, Mr. Wai-Ming Yip, and Miss Hoi-Yi Sit for their precious guidance and patience
Qiong Yu and Mr. Li Wu Huang for their efforts and assistance in synthesis of some
Besides, I would like to thank all the staffs and technicians of the Department of
Applied Biology and Chemical Technology in the Hong Kong Polytechnic University
for their genuine help and technical support, especially Dr. Pui-Kin So and Dr. Melody
I sincerely thank Dr. Man-Kin Wong and his research group again. It is my honor
to work and discuss with them in these two years and I will never forget this valuable
IV
TABLE OF CONTENT
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY I
ABSTRACT II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IV
TABLE OF CONTENT V
LIST OF FIGURES X
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
V
Chapter 2 Cysteine Modification of Peptides and Proteins using isolated
Electron-Deficient Allenes 40
2.1 Introduction 40
Deficient Allenes 42
Allenes 49
Deficient Allenes 59
2.3 Conclusion 66
VI
Chapter 3 Cysteine Modification of Peptides and Proteins using in situ
3.1 Introduction 69
Electron-Deficient Allenes 70
Electron-Deficient Allenes 81
3.3 Conclusion 86
VII
4.8 Synthesis of Model Compound 7 108
110
111
111
Reagents 4 112
Values 113
Temperatures 113
VIII
4.20 Time Course Studies on the Modification of Peptide AYEMWCFHQR 1a
Reagents 4 114
References 204
IX
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter 1 Introduction
Deficient Allenes
Figure 2.3 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide 5a
at different pH values. 47
Figure 2.4 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide 5a
at different temperatures. 48
Figure 2.8 Mass spectrum of (a) BSA-1; (b) BSA-2 and (c) BSA-3. 61
X
Figure 2.9 Molecular feature extraction spectrum of cysteine modified
labelled BSA-4. 65
Electron-Deficient Allenes
Figure 3.1 LC–MS analysis of in situ generated allene reagent (TIC chromatogram).
71
Figure 3.4 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide 5a
Figure 3.6 Mass spectrum of (a) BSA-6; (b) BSA-7; (c) BSA-8 and (d) BSA-9. 83
XI
Figure 3.7 Mass spectrum of fluorescent-labeled BSA-10. 84
Figure 4.1 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide AYEMWCFHQR 1a. 115
XII
Figure 4.16 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5e. 124
Figure 4.28 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide STSSSCNLSK 1b. 132
XIII
Figure 4.35 Mass spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6b. 135
XIV
Figure 4.54 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6h. 148
Figure 4.55 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide KSTFC 1c. 149
Figure 4.61 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide CSKFR 1d. 152
Figure 4.67 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide STSSSANLSK 1e. 156
Figure 4.70 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide STSSSHNLSK 1f. 158
XV
Figure 4.73 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide AYEMWSFHQR 1g. 160
Figure 4.76 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide WSKFR 1h. 162
Figure 4.79 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide YSKFR 1i. 164
Figure 4.82 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide PSKFR 1j. 166
Figure 4.85 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide GSKFR 1k. 168
Figure 4.88 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide ISKFR 1l. 170
XVI
LIST OF TABLES
Deficient Allenes
electron-deficient allenes. 56
allenes. 60
Electron-Deficient Allenes
XVII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
keto-ABNO 9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-3-one-N-oxy
°C Celsius
Cys Cysteine
Da Dalton
Dha dehydroalanine
DTT Dithiothreitol
equiv Equivalent(s)
ee Enantiomeric excess
2-EBA 2-ethynylbenzaldehydes
h Hour(s)
XVIII
HMPA Hexamethylphosphoramide
His Histidine
iPr Isopropyl
Lys Lysine
min minute(s)
mM millimolar
μM micromolar
MBH Morita–Baylis–Hillman
MDA malondialdehyde
Met Methionine
MSH O-mesi-tylenesulfonylhydroxylamine
NHS N-hydroxysuccinimide
OPA ortho-phthalaldehyde
OTf Trifluoromethanesulfonate
2-PCA 2-pyridinecarboxyaldehyde
PLP pyridoxal-5'-phosphate
Pro Proline
XIX
PBS Phosphate-buffered saline
Phe Phenylalanine
pSer phosphoserine
RNase Ribonuclease
Ser Serine
TCEP Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
Tris Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
Trp Tryptophan
Tyr Tyrosine
UV Ultraviolet
XX
Chapter 1 Introduction
Allenes are the simplest class of cumulenes with the general formula R2C=C=CR2,
in which two π bonds are orthogonal to each other with an ideal C–C–C angle of 180o.
For an unsubstituted allene, the central carbon is sp-hybridized while the two terminal
carbons are sp2 hybridized. The remaining two p orbitals on the central carbon overlap
with the p orbitals on the terminal carbons to produce two π bonds that are
perpendicular to each other (Figure 1.1). The overall configuration of allenes resembles
to an elongated tetrahedron.1 Therefore, allenes can be chiral when there are having two
The unique structure of allenes provides various advantages for organic synthesis.
Allenes have higher reactivity compared with their alkenyl and alkynyl analogs, which
allows controllable selectivity under mild reaction conditions. Besides, the unsaturation
The intrinsic axial chirality also allows allenes to be implemented for synthesis of
1
Moreover, many natural products contain allene moieties. Nowadays, there are
about 150 natural products with known allenic or cumulenic structures, which shows
that allenes represent important structural elements for different classes of compounds.3
The majority of naturally occurring allenes can be divided into three classes: linear
allenes, allenic carotinoids and terpenoids, and bromoallenes, in which most of them
are chiral compounds showing interesting biological activities (Figure 1.2). This unique
active compounds, such as steroids, prostaglandins and nucleosides, which can function
2
The unique features of allenes have proven themselves to be valuable structural
allenes.
In the past decades, various methods for synthesis of allenes have been developed.
reactions for preparation of allenes (Scheme 1.1). For example, upon treatment with n-
3
Scheme 1.2 Synthesis of 1,1-difluoroallenes via 1,2-elimination of lithium acetate.
allenes. With the use of chiral phosphine on the palladium center, (alkylidene-p-
4
Scheme 1.4 Palladium-catalyzed SN2' substitution of 2-bromo-1,3-dienes.
Conjugated enynes have also been widely used for allene synthesis, in which 1,4-
reaction was controlled by the choice of nucleophiles. This approach was further
5
Scheme 1.6 Synthesis of allenes by Pd0-catalyzed three-component tandem Michael
addition/cross-coupling reaction.
aryl halides.7 The regioselectivity of the reaction was controlled by the addition of
Scheme 1.7 Synthesis of highly selective allenes through tunable 1,3-lithium shift.
Alkynes, which are the isomers of allenes, are the most widely used starting
one of the earliest methods for synthesis of allenes (Scheme 1.8).8 Generally, treatment
6
of strong bases such as alkali metal amide with simple alkynes at high temperatures
could lead to the formation of allenes. For alkynes coordinated to a transition metal or
isomerization.
methods for the synthesis of allenes and various synthetic strategies of allenes from
propargylic alcohols have been developed (Scheme 1.9). For example, haloallenes
cross coupling reactions. Different methods were developed for the synthesis of
synthesizing allenes from propargylic alcohols.9c Cp2Zr(H)Cl was applied to the anti-
7
Scheme 1.9 Examples of allene synthesis from propargylic alcohols.
The success of propargyl alcohols in allene synthesis prompted Che and Wong to
use propargylamines for the synthesis of allenes (Scheme 1.10). In 2008, Che and Wong
chiral allenes using KAuCl4 as catalysts in CH3CN at 40 °C.10a High product yields (up
to 93% yield) and excellent enantioselectivities (up to 97% ee) were resulted.
allenes was developed in 2010 (Scheme 1.11).10b With the optimized conditions, a
variety of axially chiral allenes were synthesized in high product yields up to 95% and
high enantioselectivities of 98–99% ee. The use of microwave irradiation allowed the
8
completion of the reaction in a much shorter time than that required under conventional
thermal conditions.
knowledge, the synthesis of these kinds of electron deficient allenes has not been
reported.
H PF6 H PF6
R2 R2 I R2 2 I R2 2
N R R
1) I2 (1.05 equiv.), CH3CN, r.t., 1 h N Et3N (1 equiv.) N
CH2Cl2, 1 h R1
R3 2) AgPF6 (1.1 equiv.), r.t., 5 mins R1
R1
H
R3 R3
Propargylamine-based
1H-isoindoliums 3 Electron-deficient allenes 4
1,6-diynes 2
electron-deficient allenes.
9
1.1.2 Reactions of Allenes
The high degree of unsaturation and a readily accessible π-bond system allow
reactions, such as halogen and addition of hydrogen halides, but the regioselectivity is
different from the generally accepted order of cation stability (Scheme 1.14).
The protonation of an unsubstituted allene can lead to either the 2-propenyl cation
or the allyl cation. The resulting product for the addition of HBr to an unsubstituted
by the fact that the two adjacent π-bonds in the allene are perpendicular to each other.
For formation of stabilized allyl cation in allene, a 90° rotation of the C–C bond joining
the carbocation and the double bond should take place, which requires higher activation
10
energy.11 As a result, the formation of 2-propenyl cation by protonation at a terminal
phenyl and dialkyl groups, at terminal carbon atom of the allene can change the
regiochemistry.
the electron deficiency of the inner C=C double bond, which induces nucleophilic
addition at the central carbon atom. Generally, the addition of nucleophiles, such as
alcohols, phenols and thiols, is carried out in the presence of base and results in the
the intermediate A is formed after nucleophilic attack on the central carbon atom of
allene, which requires a torsion of 90° to merge into the allylic carbanion B.
Intermediate A can only lead to product C by proton transfer, while the protonation of
11
Scheme 1.15 General mechanism of nucleophilic addition to allenes12
an unsymmetrically substituted allene can occur at the two terminal carbon atoms or
Radical attack at C1 or C3 results in a pair of radical intermediates III and IV. The
more energetically favored σ-type radicals III and V. Radical attack on C2 results in a
π-type alkyl radical VI or VIII, which rotates around the C2–C3 bond of VI or the C1–
C2 bond of VIII for the formation of resonance-stabilized allylic radical VII. The
preferred site for radical addition to allene depends on three factors: (1) the degree of
substitution; (2) the nature of the attacking radical and (3) reaction parameters such as
12
allene occurs for unsubstituted allene, regardless of the nature of the radical, while
allylic intermediates.
Y R3
R3
X
X R4
R4 R2 R1
trapping
R2 R1 reagent Y
R1 R3
1 2 3 R3 X
a b g R4 R2 R1 R4 Y R4
X R2 R4
I II X X
R3 R3
R2 R1 R2 R1
III
R1 R1 Y
X X
R2 R2
R1 R3 R4 trapping R3 R4
R1
1 2 3 R3 X reagent Y
R4 R4
R2 R2 R3 R2
X R2 Y
IV X
I R1 X
4 R1
R3 R R3 R
4
R3 R 3 R4
R1 R1 R4
R1 R1
1 2 3 R3 R3 Y
R4
R4 R2 X
R2 R2 X trapping R2 X
X reagent Y
I VI
1
R1 R2 R
R1 R1 R3
1 2 3 R3 R2 R3 Y
R3
R4 R2
R2 X R4 X R4 X R4
X
I VII
VIII
of allenes.13
allenes give products with unchanged cumulene π-system (Scheme 1.17a).12 Transition
13
metal-catalyzed couplings at the central carbon are often accompanied by subsequent
reactions which rule out the cumulene system in the final products (Scheme 1.17b).
coupling of allenes.12
reactions have gained considerable attention over the last two decades because of their
reaction produces a sp2 C-Pd species, while Path II results in a π-allylpalladium species
(Scheme 1.18a).14
a) b) R
R1
Pd
R3
Path I
Pd(0) + RX b- H elimination
R R2 R4
R Pd
R HPdX
R
RPdX R1 CH2R3 base
Path II
Pd R
+ R2 Pd R4
Pd Pd(0)
R1 CH2R3 L L
R
R2 R4 R1
CH2R3
Nu R2
Nu R4
+
R
R1 CH2R3
R4
R2 Nu
14
In most cases, Pd firstly connects to RX, followed by insertion reaction into allene
cyclic skeletons, which provides possible pathways for synthesis of natural products
(Scheme 1.19).15
15
1.2 Chemical Modification of Peptides and Proteins
Proteins are a major class of biopolymers that play important roles in different
which refers to the modification of proteins after transcription and translation, is often
responsible for the diverse structures of proteins found in nature. Naturally occurring
protein PTMs play important roles in tuning the properties of proteins and modulating
peptides and proteins has emerged as an invaluable tool for biological studies and
allows in vitro and in vivo imaging analysis of the structure, function and localization
16
reactions for protein modification must tolerate biological ambient conditions at or
below 37 °C with moderate pH (pH 6–8) in aqueous solvent. Unlike standard reaction
to achieve modification with high efficiency and site selectivity. In order to avoid
purification steps, modification methods at a single site with high conversion and
The use of chemical reagents that react with primary amines is one of the most
versatile techniques for peptide and protein modification. There are two groups of
primary amino groups in protein: the α-amino group on the N-terminus of polypeptide
chains and ε-amino groups on lysine residue (Lys, K). The N-terminal amine has pKa
≈8 while that of a lysine ε-amine has pKa ≈10, so they are protonated at physiological
easy accessibility to the modification reagents. Deprotonated primary amines are highly
17
Depending on the reaction conditions, selective modification of either N-termini
approaches of modifying the amino groups in protein includes using activated esters,
modifications work within mild pH ranges from 7 to 8, which is lower than that for
proteins. Although the possible side reactions between NHS-activated esters with
tyrosine, histidine, serine and threonine were reported, the higher reaction rate of NHS
towards free amine groups overcomes the drawbacks of these side reactions.22
Apart from the classical methods, various novel approaches for lysine
modification have been developed in the past decades. For example, Tanaka and co-
18
workers developed a novel lysine-based labeling of biomolecules based on a rapid 6π-
agent and fluorescent groups could be efficiently introduced to lysine residues. The
reaction was selective to lysine residues at the protein surfaces, while it was less
methods using ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) and its derivatives through the formation
modification of lysine using a sulfonyl acrylate reagent, which was highly selective to
19
the ε-amino group of the most reactive lysine in the presence of other nucleophilic
amino acids such as cysteine (Scheme 1.23). The chemoselectivity of the modification
was attributed to the transient hydrogen bonding of the lysine amine with the sulfone
moiety of the reagents. This reaction was successfully employed to proteins with
formation of hydrazone or oxime bonds.27 However, this method was not applicable
due to the harsh reaction conditions. Francis and co-workers re-examined this approach
through oxime or hydrazone formation. The modification method was highly efficient
and selective to the N-terminus of peptides and proteins. However, it was found that
there were side reactions between some residues (His, Trp, Lys, and Pro) and PLP.
20
Scheme 1.24 N-terminal modification through PLP-mediated transamination
Considering the lower pKa of N-terminal α-amino group (pKa ~ 8) than that of
methods were developed. In 2006, Che and Wong discovered an N-terminal α amino
and Oxone as terminal oxidant (Scheme 1.25).29a Detailed studies revealed that the in
situ-generated ketenes were the key intermediates for the modification, which could be
derivatives (Scheme 1.26).28b The reaction between 2-PCA and the N-terminal residue
21
formed an N-terminal imine, followed by a nucleophilic attack of the adjacent amide
products.
peptides and proteins through reductive alkylation with aldehyde derivatives (Scheme
1.27).30 The modification was efficient with all N-terminal residues with an exception
22
20 natural amino acids) resulted in good-to-excellent N-terminal selectivity up to >99:1
using 2-EBA.
proteins because of its lower abundance on the surface of proteins compared with Lys
(Scheme 1.29). In 2004, Francis and co-workers have demonstrated the chemoselective
azo coupling reaction using diazonium compounds to modify Tyr residues on the
exterior and interior surfaces of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and bacteriophage
MS2 respectively.32a-b In 2006, they reported the use of π-allylpalladium complexes for
selective Tyr O- alkylation with a rhodamine dye and lipophilic moieties.32c The same
group also developed a three component Mannich-type reaction between Tyr residues,
23
Apart from Francis’s group, Barbas and co-workers also developed two Tyr
modification strategies. In 2010, they reported an aqueous ene-type reaction for Tyr
herceptin was successfully labeled with an integrin binding cyclic RGD peptide under
peptides and proteins, which was also applicable to labeling of the antibody
24
Tryptophan (Trp, W) is another for site-selective modification as it is a low
abundance amino acid with 1.1% frequency but exists in the primary sequence of
transition metal free modifications of Trp have been reported. For example, Francis and
alkylated and 2-alkylated products under acidic conditions (pH 1.5–3.5).36a The
peptides under strongly acidic conditions.37 The resulting acroleinyl label at the indole
hydrazines led to cleavage of MDA adduct and releasing the free indole group.
peptides with the reagents in acidic aqueous solutions (0.1 – 0.5% AcOH) at room
temperature within 30 min gave keto-ABNO adducts which resulted from C–O bond
formation at the 3-position of Trp residues. This strategy was further applied to
antibody.
25
Scheme 1.30 Examples of tryptophan modification.
Methionine (Met, M) is the second rarest amino acid in proteins and has limited
glutathione.40b
In 2017, Toste, Chang and co-workers developed a general and versatile Met-
26
The modification was based on the oxidative sulfur imidation reaction between Met
and oxaziridine derivatives. The reagents enabled specific Met labeling from a single
protein to whole proteome level under mild biocompatible conditions. The broad utility
groups, such as azide, alkyne, alkene and tetrazine can be chemically or genetically
incorporated in biomolecules, which can then further conjugate with specially designed
27
cycloaddition (CuAAC), strain-promoted azide alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), inverse
(Scheme 1.32).
by Bertozzi and co-workers.43a This technique was initially used for modification of
azido-glycoproteins on the surface of live cells, which was then further extended to the
functionality was presented in CuAAC developed by Sharpless43d and Meldal, 43e which
catalysts. Because of the high specificity and fast reaction rate, CuAAC has been widely
28
used for protein modification. However, cytotoxicity caused by Cu(I) metal has
remained a limitation for modification of live cells, which led to the exploration of
room temperature without ligands or catalysts.44a After further studies for improving
the reaction rates, SPAAC has been broadly used in live mammalian cells and
animals.44b-d
Besides, Fox and co-workers developed the use of IEDDA reactions for
dienes.45a Because of the extremely fast reaction rate and high selectivity, IEDDA has
been widely used for modifications and fluorescent labeling of proteins in live
mammalian cells.45b-d
proteins followed by treatment with tetrazoles proceeded with similar efficiency, which
cyclopropenes.46c
Most recently, our group reported a novel approach for selective modification of
29
ring cyclometalated gold (III) complexes afforded alkynylation product in > 99%
Among the 20 natural amino acids, cysteine (Cys, C) residue has a unique
nucleophilic thiolate ion (Scheme 1.34).48 The high nucleophilicity of the thiol moiety
offers advantages for developing modification approaches with high efficiency and
excellent site-selectivity.
30
Conventional protein bioconjugation methods rely on reactions at nucleophilic
amino acids, particularly lysine or cysteine residues. However, the high abundance of
low natural abundance (~1.9%) and can be readily introduced by direct mutagenesis,
is considered as an ideal residue for selective modification and wide range of cysteine
suffer the stability problems, in which they may undergo retro-Michael additions and
remarkable place in the field of bioconjugation as all of the recently FDA approved
ADCs are developed based on conjugation with cysteine residues in the polypeptide
31
1.3.1 Classical Methods
substrates, Michael Addition with maleimides, disulfide formation and reaction of Dha
with thiols.
reagents with iodide and bromide groups are commonly used. As early as 1935,
iodoacetamide was used to modify and study cysteine residues in proteins.50 A variety
of examples using such reagents for alkylating or arylating cysteine residues in proteins
have been reported over the past decades. For example, Davis and co-workers reported
that the p-iodobenzyl cysteine moiety on peptides and proteins could act as a coupling
reported that the haloalkyl substitution has a potential cross-reactivity with other amino
32
Another conventional approach of cysteine modification is the use of maleimides
(Scheme 1.36). Maleimides are Michael acceptors, which react with cysteine thiolates
to form thiosuccinimide bonds. The conjugation reaction between maleimide and the
cysteine residue in proteins was first reported by Moore and Ward in 1956, which
and wool keratin. To date, the use of maleimides still remains the preferred method of
selectivity towards thiol groups and the maleimides-thiols coupling reaction can be
by UCB, has been approved by FDA as therapeutics drugs for Crohn’s disease and
arthritis.52 Despite its wide applications in research and industry fields, it still remains
33
Disulfide bond formation is important for folding and maintaining tertiary
structural integrity in proteins. It has also been used as a common approach for chemical
formation of disulfide bonds can be simply promoted by air oxidation, but have a
SO2R’, SeR’, I, Br, Cl) are usually used (Scheme 1.37). For example, Ellman reagent,
on proteins,53 which have also been used for antibody–drug conjugates formation.54
methods for inserting dehydroalanine into peptides and proteins using serine as a
precursor. However, serine has a high natural abundance and often requires harsh
applicability to a wide range of proteins.55 This leads to the development of method for
34
transforming cysteine to Dha.56 For example, in 2008, Davis and co-workers reported
unsaturated carbonyl moiety that can undergo Michael-type addition reactions with
In 2009, Che and Wong first reported the use of electron-deficient alkynes,
containing peptides and proteins through the formation of vinyl sulfide linkages
(Scheme 1.39).58a It was proposed that the modification proceeded through the
concentration of thiolate ions in alkaline solution. The vinyl sulfide linkage was stable
35
Scheme 1.39 Modification of cysteine-containing peptides and proteins using
electron-deficient alkynes.
detection of cysteine and homocysteine.58b-c The probe was able to be applied to cellular
peptides and proteins with fluorescent probes/ biotin tags could be performed in slightly
36
In 2016, Pentelute and co-workers reported a π-clamp-mediated site-selective
charge to the overall net charge of proteins by the quaternized vinyl pyridinium reagent
alkynyl pyridines.
37
1.3.3 Transition Metal-Mediated Modifications
Due to the stringent requirements for bioconjugation and the existence of multiple
bioconjugation methods have been reported. Cysteine residue has metal binding ability,
in which the thiolate groups are capable of binding to metal ions such as iron, zinc and
modifications of cysteine.
In 2014, our group first reported a gold-mediated cysteine modification method using
modify the cysteine residues of peptides to form gold–cysteine adducts in > 90%
38
In 2015, Buchward, Pentelute and co-workers reported a cysteine modification
peptides gave C–S reductive elimination products in excellent conversions within 5 min.
fluorescent tags and affinity labels. Further applications in peptide stapling and
salts can efficiently modify cysteine-containing peptides and proteins. The modified
oxidizing reagents. Under irradiation of UV-A light, the phenylacyl thioether linkage
2.1 Introduction
In 2013, our group first reported the gold-mediated selective cysteine modification
of peptides (Scheme 2.1).65 Gold compounds were effective in activating the π-system
diversity of allenes were successfully coupled with the thiol group of cysteine-
Loh and co-workers, which utilized the C-substituted terminal allenamide moieties for
cysteine modification of peptides (Scheme 2.2).66 The strategy was based on the 1,4-
40
Scheme 2.2 Cysteine modification using allenamides.
peptides and proteins, it is envisioned that the novel electron-deficient allenes would
conducted.
reagents, buffer media and temperature. Then, detailed studies of modification products
41
The optimized modification protocol was then utilized for modification of proteins
with free cysteine residues, and the modification was confirmed by chymotrypsin
digestion followed by LC–MS analysis. This method would be applied for fluorescent
labeling of proteins.
Deficient Allenes
42
Treatment of propargylamine-based 1,6-diynes 2 with iodine generated the spiro
triethylamine, the alkyne moieties was easily isomerized to the corresponding 1H-
H PF6 H PF6
R2 R2 I R2 2 I R2 2
N R R
1) I2 (1.05 equiv.), CH3CN, r.t., 1 h N Et3N (1 equiv.) N
CH2Cl2, 1 h R1
R3 2) AgPF6 (1.1 equiv.), r.t., 5 mins R1
R1
H
R3 R3
Propargylamine-based
1H-isoindoliums 3 Electron-deficient allenes 4
1,6-diynes 2
products 2 and this method is practical and easily scalable. Electron-deficient allene 3a
could be also obtained from 2a with 87% yield under basic conditions in a one-pot
reaction.
43
The reaction mechanism for this novel iodine-mediated cascade iodination /
gives iodonium salt A. Then, the nitrogen atom of A attacks the iodonium moiety to
afford quaternary ammonium salt B. Subsequent anion exchange with AgPF6 gives
I
H I H
R2 PF6
R2 R2 I 2 I R2 R2
N N R 2 I 2
I2 N R AgPF6 N R
R3
R1 R1 R1 R1
H AgI
R3 R3 Et3N
2 A B R3 3
Et3NH
H PF6
H I H I
I R2 I R2 I R2
2
N R AgPF6 N R
2
N R
2
R1 R1 R1
H H Et3N
AgI H NEt3
R3 R3 R3
4 D C
Compounds 4b, e-f were prepared by our group members and used for the reaction
condition screening of the bioconjugation studies in the following section. Given the
44
2.2.1.2 Optimization of Modification Reaction Conditions
afforded in 92% conversion with all other amino acid residues remaining intact as
confirmed by LC–MS/MS analysis (Table 2.1, Entry 1). Increasing the loading of allene
45
Table 2.1 Optimization of modification reaction conditions.a
H PF6
I O Cl O
H
N I
PF6
N H
H
4a S
AYEMWCFHQR Cl
Potassium phosphate buffer/ CH3CN (9:1) AYEMW FHQR
1a N
25 ºC, 4 h H
O
5a
1 1 8.0 25 92
2 1 5.8 25 19
3 1 6.5 25 36
4 1 7.4 25 74
5 2 8.0 25 93
6 3 8.0 25 94
7 4 8.0 25 95
8 5 8.0 25 95
9 5 8.0 37 96
10 5 5.8 25 62
11 5 6.5 25 90
12 5 7.4 25 93
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of AYEMWCFHQR 1a (0.1 mM) with
allene reagent 4a in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at different pH
values and temperature for 4 h. b Conversion of the modification was determined by
LC–MS analysis.
46
Time course analysis was performed by conducting the reactions at different pH
values. When potassium phosphate buffer with different pH values (5.8, 6.5, 7.4 and
8.0) were used for the bioconjugation, lower conversion was resulted under slightly
acidic conditions (Figure 2.3). The conversions could be improved by increasing the
pH values of buffer (Table 2.1, Entries 1-4). This observation could be explained by
the pKa value of the thiol group of cysteine (pKa = ~ 8.5). Basic conditions could
promote the deprotonation of the thiol group to the thiolate group, resulting in stronger
temperatures was also performed (Figure 2.4). The reaction proceeded relatively slow
at 4 °C. When the reaction was performed at 37 °C, modified peptide 5a in > 70%
conversion was observed after 30 min. Comparable results were obtained when the
modification was conducted at room temperature or 37 °C for 4 h (Table 2.1, Entry 9),
100
pH 5.8 buffer/ CH3CN (9:1)
80 pH 6.5 buffer/ CH3CN (9:1)
Conversion (%)
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Time (h)
Figure 2.3 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide 5a
at different pH values.
47
100
4 °C
80 25 °C
Conversion (%)
37 °C
60
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Time (h)
Figure 2.4 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide 5a
at different temperatures.
With the optimized conditions (using 5 equivalents of allene reagent 4a), the
bicarbonate, borate buffered saline (BBS) or sodium borate buffer medium, giving
H PF6
I O Cl O
H
N I
PF6
N H
H
4a S
AYEMWCFHQR Cl
aqueous solution/ CH3CN (9:1) AYEMW FHQR
1a N
25 ºC, 4 h H
O
5a
48
3 50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer (pH 8.0) 92
4 50 mM BBS (pH 8.0) 95
5 50 mM Sodium borate buffer (pH 8.0) 96
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of AYEMWCFHQR 1a (0.1 mM) with
allene reagent 4a in aqueous solutions/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4 h. b Conversion of
the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
model study was conducted using benzyl mercaptan as substrate for the thiol-allene
electron-deficient allene 4a (1.1 equiv.) under basic condition. After that, benzyl
mercaptan was added to the reaction mixture for further reaction of 3 h at room
temperature in H2O/CH3CN (1:3). After the reaction, the corresponding vinyl thioether
product 7 was isolated in 63% yield and the structure of product was confirmed by 1H
NMR analysis.
O
H
SH I PF6
N H
H PF6 H PF6
O I O Cl
I Et3N (1 equiv.) (1 equiv.)
N N
S Cl
CH3CN, r.t., 1 h CH3CN/H2O 3:1, r.t., 3 h
Cl H
3a 4a
7
49
2.2.1.4 Investigation of Cysteine Selectivity of the Modification
with AYEMWCFHQR 1a, was treated with allene reagent 4a to afford modified
peptide 6a in 96% conversion (Table 2.3, Entry 2). From the MS/MS analysis, only the
cysteine residue on the peptides was modified with all other residues remaining intact
(Figure 2.5). The result indicated that this modification had high chemoselectivity
towards the thiol moiety of cysteine residue in the presence of other nucleophilic
8a and 9a in 93% and 94% conversion, respectively. LC–MS/MS analysis showed that
modification was on the cysteine residue with other residues remaining intact (Figures
2.6 and 2.7). Control experiments using peptides 1e-l without free cysteine residue gave
no modification (Table 2.3, Entries 5-13). This showed that the modification was highly
50
Table 2.3 Investigation of the cysteine selectivity.a
H PF6 O
H
I O Cl I
N PF6
N H
H S
4a Cl
Peptides
pH 8.0 potassium N
1a-l H
phosphate buffer/ CH3CN (9:1), O
25 ºC, 4 h
5a, 6a, 8a and 9a
H O H O H O
I PF6 I PF6 I PF6
N H N H N H
S Cl S Cl S Cl
STSSS NLSK KSTF OH SKFR
N N H2N
H O H O O
6a 8a 9a
51
Figure 2.5 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6a.
The scope of allene reagents for the bioconjugation was investigated. Electron-
substituted phenyl groups at R1 position, such as methyl and halogen, gave modified
peptides in excellent conversion between 89% and 95% (Entries 1-6). Different amine
components at R2 were also compatible with the modification (Entries 6-7). The results
showed that the modification was well tolerated with allene reagents with different
substituents.
53
For functional labeling of the cysteine-containing peptides, coumarin-derived
allene 4g was employed for the modification and gave the corresponding modified
peptides 5g in 31% conversion (Entry 7). Modification with allene reagent 4h bearing
the alkyne moiety, which could be applied for sequential modification using click
reaction was also conducted, giving the formation of 5h in 94% conversion (Entry 8).
allene reagents was also performed. Modified peptides 6b-h were obtained in good to
excellent conversion between 59% and 96% (Table 2.5), indicating the high efficiency
of this modification.
H PF6
I R2 2 H
R I R2 PF6
N
R2
R1 N H
H R1
R3 R3
S
4
AYEMWCFHQR AYEMW FHQR
pH 8.0 potassium N
1a H
phosphate buffer/ CH3CN (9:1), O
25 ºC, 4 h
5a-h
1 5a 95
54
2 5b 93
3 5c 91
4 5d 93
5 5e 89
6 5f 90
7 5g 31
55
8 5h 94
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of AYEMWCFHQR 1a (0.1 mM) with
allene reagent 4 in 50 mM pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C
for 4 h. b Conversion of the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
electron-deficient allenes.a
H PF6
I R2 2
R H
N I R2 PF6
R1 R2
N H
H
R1
R3
4 R3
S
STSSSCNLSK
pH 8.0 potassium STSSS NLSK
1b N
phosphate buffer/ CH3CN (9:1), H
O
25 ºC, 4 h
6a-h
1 6a 96
2 6b 96
56
3 6c 93
4 6d 87
5 6e 84
6 6f 96
7 6g 59
8 6h 93
57
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of STSSSCNLSK 1b (0.1 mM) with
allene reagents 4 in 50 mM pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C
for 4 h. b Conversion of the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
reducing reagents, DTT and sodium ascorbate, also showed no interference with the
modified bioconjugates.
These results indicated that the modified bioconjugates were stable toward
58
2.2.2 Modification of Cysteine-Containing Proteins Using Isolated Electron-
Deficient Allenes
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a single free cysteine residue were utilized for
bioconjugation. Treatment of BSA (0.1 mM) with allene reagents 4a, 4d and 4h (10
performed on the allene- modified protein BSA-1. By LC–MS analysis, two incomplete
([M+3H]3+ m/z 1044.1), were obtained (Figures 2.9 and 2.10). The expected mass of
this two peptide fragments from the native protein should be 1954.0 Da and 2666.3 Da
respectively. From the molecular feature extraction spectrum of modified protein BSA-
1, the mass of the two peptide fragments was shifted to 2417.1 Da and 3132.3 Da,
respectively. The increase in the mass of this two cysteine-containing fragment peptides
after modification indicated the incorporation of one molecule of 4a (M.W. = 462) into
native BSA protein is needed to confirm the mass shift of the two peptide fragments
and LC–MS/MS analysis of the modified peptide fragments is required to show that the
59
modification was on free cysteine residue Cys34 of BSA with other residues remaining
intact.
allenes.a
H PF6 H
I R2 2 PF6
I R2
R2 R
N N H
R1
R1
SH S
H R3
R3
4
1 BSA-1 65
2 BSA-2 70
3 BSA-3 56
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of BSA protein (0.1 mM) with allene
reagent 4 in 50 mM pH 7.4 PBS buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4 h. b Conversion of
the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
60
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 2.8 Mass spectrum of (a) BSA-1; (b) BSA-2 and (c) BSA-3.
61
Figure 2.9 Molecular feature extraction spectrum of cysteine modified
62
2.2.2.2 Control Experiments with Non-Free Cysteine-Containing Proteins
proteins, RNaseA and lysozyme in PBS pH 7.4 buffer at room temperature for 4 h. The
result showed that no modification was found. This result suggested that allene reagents
were highly selective to the cysteine residues on proteins and could be applied to
cysteine modification of proteins with high efficiency (Figures 2.11 and 2.12).
63
2.2.2.3 Fluorescent Labeling of Proteins
For the fluorescent labeling of proteins, alkyne handles were first incorporated on
the free cysteine residues of BSA using allene reagent 4h. After washing out the
excessive reagents, the alkyne-functionalized proteins BSA-3 were labeled with red
conversion (Scheme 2.6 and Figure 2.13). SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that,
fluorescent signal was observed for native BSA or alkyne-functionalized protein BSA-
3 (Figure 2.14). Employing Coomassie blue staining on the same gel, deep blue color
observed, indicating that the fluorescent tag has been labeled on the proteins using the
PF6
H H O
I O I
PF6
N N H
SH
H S
4h
N O N
N O N
O
O
N
H O
N N
I O
N PF6
N3
N H
O
Rhodamine azide 10,
S
CuSO4, TBTA, TCEP N
N N
pH 7.4 PBS buffer,
37 ºC, 1 h
64
Figure 2.13 Mass spectrum of rhodamine-labeled BSA-4.
labelled BSA-4.
65
2.3 Conclusion
functionalities to give the corresponding allene products 3. This new class of electron
deficient allenes could be employed for cysteine modification of peptides and proteins
through the interaction between allene and the nucleophilic thiol moiety on cysteine
residue.
presented. The modification could proceed with high efficiency (up to 96% conversion
different functional groups were compatible with this modification. The modified
products were stable towards excessive thiol-containing reagents and reducing agents.
modification using the azide-alkyne click reaction. This newly developed modification
modification protocols.
66
2.4 Suggestions for Future Research
peptide modification, the two cysteine-containing peptides 1a and 1b used for the study
are linear peptides consisting of different amino acid residues. The results showed that
the modification could proceed smoothly in the presence of amino acids with bulky or
aromatic side chains, including alanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. In the future, it is
envisioned that the modification can be further applied to the modification of cyclic
modification was well tolerated with allene reagents with different substituents. Based
on this results, it is suggested that other functionalized allene reagents can be prepared,
such as PEG probes for improving the water solubility and biocompatibility, so as to
protein, the cysteine-containing peptide fragments were found, but the analysis and
identification of modification site was not yet completed. Therefore, it is suggested that
modification. Apart from chymotrypsin, it is suggested that the choice of protease for
Moreover, as protein digestion produces relatively long peptide fragments which may
be more difficult to interpret, the conditions for MS/MS analysis of tryptic peptide
67
fragments can be further optimized. For example, apart from performing MS/MS with
alternative and effective approach for analysis of peptide fragments while the fragile
68
Chapter 3 Cysteine Modification of Peptides and Proteins using in situ
3.1 Introduction
deficient allenes was presented in Chapter 2, in which the electron deficient allene
deficient allenes.
isoindolium. With the addition of reducing agent for quenching of reaction, the reaction
mixture could become a stock solution of in situ generated electron deficient allene with
reagents with reducing agents. Then, studies of the modification were performed by
69
3.2 Results and Discussion
Electron-Deficient Allenes
for in situ generation of 1H-isoindolium 3 (Scheme 3.1). After one hour, the reaction
mixture was further diluted to 5 mM in CH3CN. Under basic reaction conditions, the
R3 2) reducing agent R1
R1
R3
2 3
the formation of in situ generated 1H-isoindolium 3a. After the reaction for 1 h,
reducing agent was added to the reaction mixture so as to quench the excess ICl. The
residues on peptides. The cysteine sulfhydryl group is nucleophilic and easily oxidized,
70
which can be readily converted to sulfenic acids and disulfides under oxidizing
oxidation of cysteine, which can block the target residue and hamper the modification
of peptides with allene reagents. Therefore, the addition of reducing agent in the
The stock solution was directly used for bioconjugation with cysteine-containing
sodium ascorbate, were used for selection of reducing agent and optimization of
reaction conditions (Table 3.1, Entries 1-4). From the mass spectrum of the stock
3.1). The stock solution showed excellent stability and could be stored at –20 °C for
repeated use.
Figure 3.1 LC–MS analysis of in situ generated allene reagent (TIC chromatogram).
71
4a (1 equivalent) in pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4 h
modification (Table 3.1, Entry 5). Additionally, formation of side product 5a’ was
O
H
O Cl
N I
N
1) ICl (1.05 equiv.), CH3CN, r.t., 1 h
2) reducing agent
Cl
Cl
3a
2a
H O
I
Cl
N H
AYEMWCFHQR 1a
S
pH 8.0 potassium phosphate Cl
buffer/ CH3CN (9:1) AYEMW FHQR
N
25 ºC, 4 h H
O
5a
Propargylamine- Amount of
Conversion
Entry based 1,6-diynes Reducing Agent Reducing
(%)b
(equiv.) Agent (equiv.)
1 1 TCEP 1 98
2 1 NaBH4 1 95
3 1 DTT 1 95
4 1 Sodium ascorbate 1 93
5 1 TCEP 2 89
6 2 TCEP 1 99
7 3 TCEP 1 99
72
8 4 TCEP 1 99
9 5 TCEP 1 99
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of AYEMWCFHQR 1a (0.1 mM) with
different amounts of in situ generated allene reagent 4a prepared from
propargylamine-based 1,6-diyne 2a in 50 mM pH 8.0 potassium phosphate
b
buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4 h. Conversion of the modification was
determined by LC–MS analysis.
H Cl
I O O O
H
N I
Cl N
N H
Cl
+
S
Cl S
5 mM stock solution in CH3CN
with TCEP (2 equiv.) AYEMW FHQR
N AYEMW FHQR
AYEMWCFHQR 1a H N
O H Cl
O
showed the formation of 5a’ as the single product in 30% conversion. The cysteine
73
residue on the peptides was modified while all other residues remained intact as shown
in LC–MS/MS analysis (Figure 3.3). This result revealed that product 5a’ was
suggested to form by cysteine modification through thiol-yne reaction between the thiol
group on cysteine and the alkyne group on the propargylamine-based 1,6-diyne 2a,
observed, the reactivity was far lower than that of electron-deficient allene reagents.
74
Besides, the formation of product 5a’ could be minimized (< 2% conversion) under
optimized reaction conditions. Therefore, this observation was assumed to have little
reagents with that using the isolated electron-deficient allene reagents, time course
the in situ generated allene reagents gave comparable results with that conducted using
the isolated reagents, in which better conversion could be obtained in buffer with higher
pH values. The reaction rates were lower in slightly acidic media (pH 5.8 and pH 6.5)
at the first one hour of the reaction, which could be attributed to the low conversion of
their alkyne forms, which was less reactive than allenes towards thiol group on cysteine.
As a result, lower reaction rates were observed when the bioconjugation was conducted
When the reaction was performed at room temperature or 37 °C, modified peptide
5a in > 80% conversion was observed at the first hour of the reaction. The conjugation
75
could also proceed smoothly at 4 °C, giving approximately 80% conversion after 4 h.
The result revealed that the use of the in situ generated allene reagents generally gave
improved conversion of modified peptides compared with the isolated allene reagents.
This could be explained by the presence of TCEP in the in situ generated allene reagents,
which could prevent the cysteine-containing peptides from dimerization. Therefore, the
cysteine residues on peptides could remain active for reaction with the allene reagents,
(a) 100
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Time (h)
(b)
100
4 °C
80 25 °C
Conversion (%)
37 °C
60
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Time (h)
Figure 3.4 Time course experiments of the formation of cysteine modified peptide
5a at (a) different pH values; (b) different temperatures.
76
3.2.1.3 Investigation of Scope of in situ Generated Allene Reagents
allene reagent bearing 1 equivalent of TCEP and pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer at
25 °C for 4 h was utilized for expansion of the scope with other in situ generated allene
situ generated allene reagents 4a-d, which differed in the substituents on the para-
substituted phenyl ring at the R1 position. Modified peptides 5a-d and 6a-d were
modification was compatible with in situ generated allene reagents with different
H
R2 R2 I R2 2 Cl
N R
N
1) ICl (1.05 equiv.), CH3CN, r.t., 1 h
R3 2) TCEP (1 equiv.) R1
R1
R3
2 3
H
I R2 Cl
R2
N H
AYEMWCFHQR 1a R1
R3 S
pH 8.0 potassium phosphate
buffer/ CH3CN (9:1) AYEMW FHQR
N
25 ºC, 4 h H
O
5a-d, g
77
Propargylamine-based
Entry Modified peptide Conversion (%)b
1,6-diynes 2
1 5a 98
2 5b 96
3 5c 96
4 5d 98
5 5g 52
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of AYEMWCFHQR 1a (0.1 mM) with
in situ generated allene reagents 4 prepared from different propargylamine-based 1,6-
diynes 2 in 50 mM pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4 h.
b
Conversion of the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
78
Table 3.3 Modification of cysteine-containing peptide STSSSCNLSK 1b with in situ
R3 2) TCEP (1 equiv.) R1
R1
R3
2 3
H
I R2 2 Cl
R
N H
STSSSCNLSK 1b R1
R3 S
pH 8.0 potassium phosphate
buffer/ CH3CN (9:1) STSSS NLSK
N
25 ºC, 4 h H
O
6a-d, g
Propargylamine-based
Entry Modified peptide Conversion (%)b
1,6-diynes 2
1 6a 98
2 6b 98
3 6c 99
79
4 6d 99
5 6g 85
a
Conditions of the modifications: treatment of STSSSCNLSK 1b (0.1 mM) with in
situ generated allene reagents 4 prepared from different propargylamine-based 1,6-
diynes 2 in 50 mM pH 8.0 potassium phosphate buffer/CH3CN (9:1) at 25 °C for 4
h. b Conversion of the modification was determined by LC–MS analysis.
1,6-diynes 2a-d, the substituents on the phenyl ring showed increased electron
withdrawing property, in which 2d (-CN) > 2c (-CF3) > 2a (-Cl) > 2b (-H). Time course
modification for 4 h, but there was difference in reaction rate among the reagents at the
beginning of the modification. At the first half hour of the reaction, reagents with
in which 5d (-CN) > 5c (-CF3) > 5a (-Cl) > 5b (-H). This observation could be
80
presence of strong electron withdrawing groups, which facilitated the nucleophilic
Electron-Deficient Allenes
protein modification. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a single free cysteine residue
were used for bioconjugation with in situ generated allene reagents 4a-d. With 1
equivalent of allene reagent 4a, modified protein BSA-1 was obtained in 28%
conversion by LC–MS analysis. When the loading of allene reagent was increased from
and the results were consistent with four allene reagents 4a-d.
81
Taking modified protein BSA-6 as the example (Figure 3.6a), two bioconjugates
corresponding to single-site modification were found. The peak with m/z 66765.96 and
m/z 66892.00 indicated that one molecule of 2a (M.W.= 335) and 4a (M.W.= 462) was
4a and one molecule of 2a (m/z 67690.64), three molecules of 4a (m/z 67817.08), three
68281.26) was observed from the mass spectrum, indicating that the modification
occurred on not only the free cysteine Cys34, but also the cysteine residues produced
from reduced disulfide bonds. This observation was possibly attributed to the presence
of TCEP in the in situ generated allene reagents, leading to disulfide bond reduction
H
R2 R2 I R2 2 Cl
N R
N
1) ICl (1.05 equiv.), CH3CN, r.t., 1 h
R3 2) TCEP (1 equiv.) R1
R1
R3
2 3
H
SH I R2 2 Cl
R
N H
R1
R3 S
protein
modified protein
electron-deficient allenes.a
82
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3.6 Mass spectrum of (a) BSA-6; (b) BSA-7; (c) BSA-8 and (d) BSA-9.
83
Bioconjugation of BSA with 10 equivalents of fluorescent allene reagent 4g was
conversion, respectively (Figure 3.7). The high conversion of 4g-modified protein than
the charged protein surface more effectively than the charged and bulkier electron
deficient allene 4g. As a result, the reaction of protein with 2g was more favorable.
fluorescent analysis while no fluorescent signal was observed for native BSA (Figure
3.8). Employing Coomassie blue staining on the same gel, deep blue color signals of
native protein and BSA-10 were observed, indicating that the fluorescent tag has been
84
Figure 3.8 SDS-PAGE analysis of native BSA and BSA-10.
Disulfide bond formation is essential for the folding, activity and stability of
proteins. The modification of proteins with the in situ generated allene reagents resulted
modification and Circular Dichroism can be used to examine if the modifications alter
the secondary and tertiary structures of the proteins. Despite the formation of
heterogenous products, this modification method still showed high selectivity towards
85
3.3 Conclusion
allenes was developed. Based on the newly developed cysteine modification method
Chapter 2, a one-step procedure for preparation of electron deficient allene reagents for
The in situ generated electron deficient allene reagents were prepared by reaction
agent, the stable reaction mixtures could serve as stock solutions of in situ generated
The modification of peptides using the in situ generated allene reagents could
proceed with high efficiency (up to 99% conversion in 4 h) and the results were
comparable with those obtained using the isolated allene reagents. These findings
showed that this approach could serve as an alternative method for preparation of allene
reagents and be utilized in the newly developed cysteine modification using electron-
deficient allenes.
For protein modification and labeling, single-site modification was resulted to give
86
Chapter 4 Experimental Section
All reagents were commercially available and used without further purification. Milli-
Q® water used as reaction solvent in peptide and protein modification and LC–MS was
deionised using a Milli-Q® Gradient A10 system (Millipore, Billerica, USA). Flash
column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh ASTM) with
spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX-400, Varian Unity Inova 400 NB spectrometers.
All chemical shifts are quoted on the scale in ppm using TMS or residual solvent as the
internal standard. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hertz (Hz) with the following
t = triplet and m = multiplet. All the mass spectra were obtained on an ESI source of
Agilent 6540 Ultra High Definition (UHD) Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS systems in
LC–MS analyses for peptide identification were performed by using an Agilent 6540
UHD Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS system equipped with an ion spray source and an
Agilent 1290 Infinity LC, using an Agilent ZORBAX RRHD SB300-C18 (1.8 μm, 2.1
x 100 mm) column. 3 μL of sample was injected with a flow rate of the flow rate was
0.2 mL/min. Mobile phase A was made of Milli-Q® water containing 0.1% formic acid.
Mobile phase B was made of HPLC grade methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The
initial conditions for separation were 5% B for 3 min, followed by a linear gradient to
87
95% B by 17 min. The composition was maintained for 10 min, followed by a linear
conditions optimized for the detection of reaction mixture were the following: Gas
temperature: 300 °C, Drying gas: 8 L/min, Nebulizer: 35 psig, Sheath gas temperature:
270 °C, Sheath gas flow: 11 L/min, VCap: 3500 V, Nozzle voltage: 1000 V.
LC–MS analyses for protein identification were performed by using an Agilent 6540
UHD Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS system equipped with an ion spray source and an
Agilent 1290 Infinity LC, using an Agilent ZORBAX RRHD SB300-C3 (1.8 μm, 2.1
x 100 mm) column. 3 μL of sample was injected with a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Mobile
phase A was made of Milli-Q® water containing 0.1% formic acid. Mobile phase B was
made of HPLC grade methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The initial conditions for
1 min. The composition was maintained for 4 min. Operating conditions optimized for
the detection of reaction mixture were the followings: Gas temperature: 300 °C, Drying
gas: 8 L/min, Nebulizer: 35 psig, Sheath gas temperature: 350 °C, Sheath gas flow: 11
88
4.2 Literature Reference of Compounds
M. L. Mason, R. F. Lalisse, T. J.
Finnegan, C. M. Hadad, D. A. Modarelli,
J. R. Parquette, Langmuir, 2019, 35,
12460−12468.
The crude reaction mixture of unmodified peptide (starting) and modified peptide
(product) was subjected to LC–MS analysis with elution time of 35 min. After data
determined by measuring the relative peak intensities of starting and product in the
89
4.4 Calculation of Protein Conversion
The crude reaction mixture of unmodified protein (starting) and modified protein
(product) was subjected to LC–MS analysis with elution time of 35 min. After data
determined by measuring the relative peak intensities of starting and product in the
To synthesize i, a mixture of aldehyde (10 mmol, 1 equiv.), amine (12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.),
alkyne (15 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and gold catalyst (2 mol%) in ClCH2CH2Cl was stirred at
60 °C overnight. After the reaction, the resulting mixture was concentrated under
90
reduced pressure and purified by flash column chromatography using EtOAc/hexane
mL of CH3OH was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. After the reaction, the
reaction mixture was diluted with 20 mL of H2O. The mixture was then extracted with
CH2Cl2 (20 mL × 3). The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and purified by
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.57 – 7.52 (m, 1H), 7.44 –
7.34 (m, 3H), 7.28 (dd, J = 8.8, 7.3 Hz, 3H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 3.76 – 3.65 (m, 4H), 3.34 (s,
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.38, 134.44, 133.41, 133.15, 128.83, 128.77, 128.72,
127.92, 122.68, 121.53, 86.88, 86.74, 82.18, 81.85, 67.18, 59.96, 50.26.
91
Pale yellow solid, 40% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.74 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 – 7.53 (m, 1H), 7.52 –
7.46 (m, 2H), 7.41 – 7.35 (m, 1H), 7.34 – 7.25 (m, 4H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 3.76 – 3.66 (m,
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.64, 133.37, 131.94, 128.93, 128.70, 128.45, 128.42,
127.84, 123.09, 122.69, 88.05, 85.61, 82.09, 81.94, 67.23, 59.97, 50.24.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (s, 5H), 7.41 – 7.35 (m,
1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 3.75 – 3.66 (m, 4H), 3.35 (s, 1H), 2.67 (ddt,
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.17, 133.49, 132.21, 130.39, 128.81, 128.77, 128.03,
126.87, 125.46, 125.42, 125.39, 125.35, 122.75, 122.72, 88.41, 86.73, 82.27, 82.25,
92
Yellow solid, 40% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69 – 7.63 (m, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz, 3H), 7.38 (td, J = 7.6, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (s,
1H), 3.69 (pt, J = 5.5, 2.8 Hz, 4H), 3.35 (s, 1H), 2.73 – 2.58 (m, 4H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 133.50, 132.46, 132.16, 128.77, 128.70, 128.09, 82.34,
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz,
1H), 7.43 (s, 4H), 7.38 (td, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.31 – 7.26 (m, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 3.70
(dt, J = 5.8, 3.8 Hz, 4H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 3.17 (s, 1H), 2.74 – 2.59 (m, 4H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.39, 133.43, 132.18, 131.84, 128.87, 128.75, 127.94,
123.55, 122.70, 122.12, 87.82, 87.49, 83.36, 82.18, 81.87, 67.21, 60.02, 50.28.
93
4.5.1 Synthesis of Coumarin-derived Propargylamine-based 1,6-diyne 2g
room temperature for 8 h. After the reaction, the reaction mixture was diluted with 30
mL of CH2Cl2. The mixture was washed with H2O (30 mL × 2), and then dried over
anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation to give residue
piperidine (1.57 mmol, 1 equiv.) and DMAP (0.31 mmol, 0.2 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL)
94
was stirred at room temperature for 8 h. After the reaction, the solvent was removed by
rotary evaporation. The mixture was re-dissolved by TFA/CH2Cl2 (1:1, 5 mL:5 mL)
and was stirred in room temperature for 1 h. After the reaction, the reaction mixture
was diluted with 20 mL of H2O. The mixture was neutralized to pH 8.0 by 1 M NaOH
solution. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL × 3), and then dried over
anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation to give residue
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.80 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.69 (s, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 9.0
Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.02 – 4.12 (m, 1H),
3.45 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 3.10 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 2.80 – 2.65 (m, 2H), 2.01 (d, J
= 9.6 Hz, 2H), 1.56 – 1.38 (m, 2H), 1.24 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H).
equiv.), iii (12 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), 1-chloro-4-ethynylbenzene (15 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and
95
gold catalyst (2 mol%) in ClCH2CH2Cl was stirred at 60 °C overnight. After the
reaction, the resulting mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified
iv.
10 mL of CH3OH was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. After the reaction, the
reaction mixture was diluted with 20 mL of H2O. The mixture was then extracted with
CH2Cl2 (20 mL × 3). The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and purified by
flash column chromatography using EtOAc/CH2Cl2 (1:4) as eluent to give product 2g.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.68 (s, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.6
Hz, 1H), 7.57 – 7.52 (m, 1H), 7.46 – 7.34 (m, 4H), 7.31 – 7.27 (m, 2H), 6.63 (dd, J =
9.0, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 4.00 (td, J = 13.8, 6.8 Hz, 1H),
3.44 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 3.35 (s, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 29.3, 11.5 Hz, 2H), 2.69 – 2.56 (m,
1H), 2.53 – 2.42 (m, 1H), 2.07 – 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.78 (s, 1H), 1.74 – 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.23
96
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.84, 162.46, 157.76, 152.62, 148.07, 141.18, 134.27,
133.23, 131.20, 128.75, 127.73, 122.69, 121.75, 110.67, 110.03, 108.56, 96.74, 87.01,
was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, and then AgPF6 (1.1 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) was
added to the reaction mixture and stirred for 5 min. The resulting precipitate (AgI) was
separated by suction filtration and washed by CH2Cl2. The filtrate was concentrated
under vacuum and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography using
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.60 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 7.84 – 7.68
(m, 3H), 7.59 – 7.53 (m, 2H), 7.50 – 7.44 (m, 2H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 4.42 (td, J = 10.4, 2.8
97
Hz, 1H), 4.32 (td, J = 14.2, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 4.20 – 3.99 (m, 3H), 3.87 – 3.77 (m, 1H), 3.66
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 146.60, 136.25, 135.29, 133.80, 132.60, 130.21,
129.08, 129.00, 125.90, 124.82, 118.45, 92.86, 80.29, 79.03, 65.67, 62.94, 61.96, 61.72,
56.44.
1H NMR (600 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.80 – 7.68
(m, 3H), 7.50 (dd, J = 25.8, 6.9 Hz, 3H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 4.40 (t,
J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (t, J = 14.0 Hz, 2H), 4.19 – 4.11 (m, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 12.9 Hz,
1H), 4.01 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (150 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 146.57, 136.40, 132.57, 132.01, 130.44, 130.17,
129.05, 128.84, 125.86, 124.76, 119.50, 94.01, 79.31, 79.02, 65.79, 62.83, 61.92, 61.69,
56.38, 30.68.
98
White solid, 40% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.82 – 7.73
(m, 7H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 4.48 – 4.38 (m, 1H), 4.36 – 4.25 (m, 2H), 4.14 (t, J = 12.2 Hz,
2H), 4.02 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 3.86 – 3.73 (m, 1H), 3.67 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 146.55, 136.04, 132.86, 132.58, 130.27, 129.07,
125.84, 125.70, 125.66, 125.63, 125.59, 124.82, 123.85, 122.35, 92.25, 81.62, 79.15,
19
F NMR (376 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ -62.55, -70.21, -72.10.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.60 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J =
8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (t, J = 10.1 Hz, 5H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 4.42 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 4.35 –
4.25 (m, 2H), 4.13 (t, J = 10.1 Hz, 2H), 4.01 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (t, J = 11.7 Hz,
99
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 146.54 (s), 135.93 (s), 132.67 (d, J = 18.6 Hz),
130.27 (s), 129.07 (s), 125.83 (s), 124.82 (s), 124.33 (s), 118.06 (s), 112.55 (s), 92.16
(s), 82.81 (s), 79.13 (s), 65.42 (s), 63.10 (s), 61.95 (s), 61.67 (s), 56.55 (s).
1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.64 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 7.75 (t, J = 7.5
Hz, 1H), 7.72 – 7.67 (m, 2H), 7.55 – 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.15 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (s,
1H), 4.26 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 4.24 – 4.15 (m, 2H), 4.14 – 4.02 (m, 3H), 3.75 (ddd, J
= 14.3, 10.7, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (dd, J = 13.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (150 MHz, CD3CN) δ 164.24 (d, J = 250.5 Hz), 147.64, 136.67, 135.26 (d,
J = 8.8 Hz), 133.45, 130.93, 129.83, 127.33, 125.42, 116.82 (d, J = 3.5 Hz), 116.68 (d,
J = 22.7 Hz), 94.90, 78.31, 75.85, 67.58, 63.24, 62.72, 62.60, 57.15.
100
White solid, 85% yield.
1H NMR (600 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.59 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.81 – 7.62
(m, 3H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 4.20 (t, J =
13.3 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (t, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz,
1H), 2.35 – 2.20 (m, 4H), 2.13 (s, 2H), 1.83 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 2H), 1.68-1.57 (m, 1H).
13C NMR (150 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 147.57, 140.38, 136.93, 132.44, 131.80, 129.98,
129.46, 129.30, 125.73, 124.71, 116.64, 93.03, 79.40, 77.80, 64.88, 64.54, 57.56, 21.56,
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.12 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 8.53 – 8.47 (m, 2H), 7.76 –
7.70 (m, 2H), 7.66 – 7.61 (m, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H),
7.38 – 7.34 (m, 2H), 7.28 (s, 2H), 6.65 – 6.61 (m, 1H), 6.45 – 6.39 (m, 2H), 4.13 (d, J
= 13.4 Hz, 1H), 4.06 – 3.95 (m, 2H), 3.92 – 3.81 (m, 1H), 3.43 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 4H), 2.74
101
(td, J = 10.6, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 2.49 – 2.42 (m, 1H), 2.37 – 2.26
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.56, 163.36, 157.85, 153.16, 148.45, 147.63, 136.79,
136.07, 133.95, 133.68, 133.28, 131.62, 130.35, 129.34, 129.11, 126.74, 125.35,
118.38, 110.55, 109.29, 108.49, 96.57, 94.93, 78.49, 73.80, 69.12, 60.49, 54.40, 45.31,
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.59 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 7.76 – 7.72
(m, 2H), 7.57 – 7.49 (m, 4H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 4.40 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, 2H), 4.35 – 4.25 (m,
2H), 4.08 (td, J = 30.1, 27.2, 12.7 Hz, 4H), 3.86 – 3.74 (m, 1H), 3.65 (d, J = 12.6 Hz,
1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 146.52, 136.20, 132.53, 132.22, 131.97, 130.17,
129.03, 125.81, 124.75, 123.50, 119.87, 93.19, 83.66, 82.59, 81.06, 79.04, 65.68, 62.90,
102
4.7 Synthesis of Electron-Deficient Allenes 4
A mixture of 3 (0.5 mmol) and Et3N (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 5 mL of CH2Cl2 (5 mL)
was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The product was separated by suction filtration
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.79 (dd, J = 6.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (s, 1H), 8.03 (s,
1H), 7.78 – 7.71 (m, 2H), 7.71 – 7.65 (m, 2H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.48 – 7.42
(m, 1H), 4.49 (t, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.28 – 4.01 (m, 7H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 195.44, 148.62, 135.10, 132.96, 130.97, 130.76,
130.63, 129.52, 129.20, 129.01, 124.82, 122.30, 121.35, 112.79, 78.09, 64.18, 63.20,
60.86, 60.76.
103
White solid, 85% yield.
1H NMR (600 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.88 – 8.65 (m, 1H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.77
– 7.70 (m, 2H), 7.66 (dd, J = 4.3, 3.1 Hz, 2H), 7.53 – 7.42 (m, 4H), 4.53 (t, J = 12.4 Hz,
1H), 4.36 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.30 – 4.04 (m, 6H).
13C NMR (150 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 195.22, 148.66, 132.95, 130.87, 130.75, 130.49,
130.17, 129.51, 129.07, 128.95, 124.83, 122.23, 121.23, 113.80, 78.01, 64.11, 63.32,
60.87, 60.73.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.79 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H),
7.91 – 7.80 (m, 4H), 7.74 (tt, J = 8.3, 3.9 Hz, 2H), 7.51 – 7.44 (m, 1H), 4.47 (t, J = 11.1
Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.30 – 4.07 (m, 6H).
104
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 196.30, 148.57, 134.55, 132.93, 131.05, 130.44,
129.71, 129.04, 126.18, 124.81, 122.32, 121.46, 112.64, 78.20, 64.28, 63.17, 60.79,
54.89.
19
F NMR (376 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ -62.26, -70.21, -72.10.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.79 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.11 (s, 1H),
7.95 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J =
7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.49 – 4.33 (m, 2H), 4.30 – 4.06 (m, 6H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 196.69 (s), 148.55 (s), 135.07 (s), 133.19 (s), 132.92
(s), 131.08 (s), 130.36 (s), 129.69 (s), 129.05 (s), 124.81 (s), 122.34 (s), 121.56 (s),
118.41 (s), 112.70 (s), 112.40 (s), 78.16 (s), 64.30 (s), 63.09 (s), 60.83 (d, J = 6.6 Hz).
105
White solid, 83% yield.
1H NMR (600 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.80 (s, 1H), 8.44 (s, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.73 (s, 4H),
7.45 (s, 1H), 7.33 (s, 2H), 4.50 (t, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 4.29-
13C NMR (150 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 194.92, 163.24 (d, J = 248.5 Hz), 148.60, 132.91,
131.39, 131.36 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 130.79 (d, J = 23.1 Hz), 131.33, 130.86, 130.71, 128.96,
124.79, 122.24, 121.26, 116.54 (d, J = 21.9 Hz), 112.78, 77.94, 64.12, 63.15, 60.83,
60.73.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.84 – 8.73 (m, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.77
– 7.66 (m, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.44 – 7.36 (m, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
106
4.25 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 1H), 4.10 – 3.89 (m, 3H), 2.46 (dd, J = 13.2, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 2.11 (d,
J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 1.88 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H), 1.81 – 1.62 (m, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 195.64, 149.45, 140.31, 132.91, 131.02, 130.69,
130.08, 128.92, 128.83, 127.45, 124.67, 122.08, 120.68, 112.42, 77.17, 66.27, 65.06,
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.25 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 8.78 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.53
(s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.59 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 7.43 (s, 2H), 7.41 (s, 2H),
7.39 (s, 2H), 6.68 – 6.63 (m, 1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 4.33 – 4.28 (m, 1H), 4.21 (d, J = 6.7 Hz,
1H), 4.10 (s, 1H), 3.99 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 5H), 2.54 – 2.32 (m,
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.48, 163.65, 157.88, 153.22, 149.21, 148.41, 137.06,
133.69, 131.66, 131.33, 130.47, 130.35, 130.27, 130.13, 128.67, 128.17, 126.04,
124.55, 122.92, 115.35, 110.62, 109.39, 108.53, 96.67, 73.05, 63.41, 62.50, 45.36,
107
White solid, 90% yield.
1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 8.81 – 8.76 (m, 1H), 8.43 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.77
– 7.69 (m, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.47 – 7.41 (m, 1H),
4.47 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 19.5 Hz, 2H), 4.17 (ddt, J = 45.9, 16.3, 9.0 Hz,
6H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 195.77, 148.53, 132.86, 132.56, 130.87, 130.63,
130.54, 129.17, 124.73, 122.22, 121.28, 113.10, 82.94, 77.98, 64.11, 63.13, 60.79,
60.68.
H PF6 H PF6
O I O Cl
I Et3N (1 equiv.)
N N
CH3CN, r.t., 1 h
Cl H
3a 4a
O
H
SH I PF6
N H
(1 equiv.)
S Cl
CH3CN/H2O 3:1, r.t., 3 h
108
A mixture of 1H-isoindolium 3a (0.2 mmol) and Et3N (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) in 3 mL of
CH3CN was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Then, benzyl mercaptan (0.2 mmol, 1
equiv) and 1 mL of H2O was added to the mixture and stirred for 3 h. After the reaction,
the reaction mixture was diluted with 3 mL of CH2Cl2. The mixture was then extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 mL × 2). The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and purified
by flash column chromatography using CH2Cl2/CH3OH (50:1) as the eluent to give the
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) δ 8.68 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.77 – 7.64 (m, 3H), 7.62 –
7.55 (m, 3H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34 – 7.25 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H),
7.15 (s, 1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 3.94 – 3.84 (m, 2H), 3.81 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 3.77 – 3.64
(m, 2H), 3.48 – 3.36 (m, 2H), 3.32 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (t, J = 12.3 Hz, 2H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3CN) δ 149.72, 139.23, 137.64, 136.97, 136.16, 134.16,
133.78, 132.41, 131.93, 131.70, 131.19, 131.00, 130.59, 130.10, 129.22, 127.75,
109
4.9 Modification of Peptides Using Isolated Electron-Deficient Allene Reagents 4
different pH values was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at 25 ºC for 0–4 h. At each
time point, 25 μL of the resulting mixture was collected and diluted with 25 µL of Milli-
was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at different temperatures for 0–4 h. At each
time point, 25 μL of the resulting mixture was collected and diluted with 25 µL of Milli-
110
4.12 Studies on the Stability of the Modified Peptide 5a
and dithiothreitol (DTT)), reducing reagent (sodium ascorbate) (50 mM in H2O) was
7.4 PBS buffer was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at 25 ºC for 4 h. The modified
The native BSA and modified proteins (BSA-3, BSA-4, BSA-10) (10 μL) was mixed
with 2X loading buffer (10 μL) in a 0.5 mL Eppendorf tube and then boiled for 5 min.
111
Samples were analysed by SDS-PAGE by loading a sample of the boiled solution (10
μL) in each lane of a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and running in a SE 250 Mini-Vertical Unit
(Amersham, USA) at 125 V at room temperature for 110 min. After SDS-PAGE
separation, the fluorescence of gel was scanned by Azure C600 gel-imaging system.
The gel was stained with Coomassie Blue G250 for 10 min, and destained in the
methanol/acetic acid solution (45% methanol, 10% acetic acid) for 10 min. The
(5.25 μmol, 0.26 μL) in 500 μL of CH3CN was stirred at room temperature for 1 h.
After that, the reaction mixture was diluted with 450 μL of CH3CN and 50 μL of TCEP
solution (100 mM in H2O) was added to the mixture. The reagent was stored at –20 °C
Reagents 4
phosphate buffer was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at 25 ºC for 4 h. The modified
112
4.18 Time Course Studies on the Modification of Peptide AYEMWCFHQR 1a
Values
phosphate buffer with different pH values was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at
25 ºC for 0–4 h. At each time point, 25 μL of the resulting mixture was collected and
diluted with 25 µL of Milli-Q® water. The resulting mixture was characterized by LC–
Temperatures
temperatures for 0–4 h. At each time point, 25 μL of the resulting mixture was collected
and diluted with 25 µL of Milli-Q® water. The resulting mixture was characterized by
113
4.20 Time Course Studies on the Modification of Peptide AYEMWCFHQR 1a
potassium phosphate buffer was treated in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at 25 ºC for 0–4 h.
At each time point, 25 μL of the resulting mixture was collected and diluted with 25 µL
of Milli-Q® water. The resulting mixture was characterized by LC–MS and LC–
Reagents 4
a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube at 25 ºC for 4 h. The modified product was purified by Bio-
114
4.22 MS Spectra
115
b-ions 72 235 364 495 681 784 931 1068 1196
H 2N A Y E M W C F H Q R COOH
1299 1136 1007 876 690 587 440 303 175 y-ions
116
Figure 4.5 Mass spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5a.
117
Figure 4.7 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5b.
118
Figure 4.9 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5b.
119
Figure 4.10 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5c.
120
Figure 4.12 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5c.
121
Figure 4.13 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5d.
122
Figure 4.15 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5d.
123
Figure 4.16 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5e.
124
Figure 4.18 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5e.
125
Figure 4.19 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5f.
126
Figure 4.21 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5f.
127
Figure 4.22 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5g.
128
Figure 4.24 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5g.
129
Figure 4.25 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 5h.
130
Figure 4.27 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 5h.
131
NH 2
H 3C OH OH SH
O H O H O H O H O
H 2N N N N N O
N N N N N
H O H O H O H O H OH
OH OH OH NH 2 OH
O
STSSSCNLSK
132
b-ions 88 189 276 363 450 667 780 867 1241
H 2N S T S S S C N L S K COOH
926 825 738 651 564 461 347 234 147 y-ions
133
Figure 4.32 Mass spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6a.
134
Figure 4.34 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6b.
135
Figure 4.36 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6b.
136
Figure 4.37 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6c.
137
Figure 4.39 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6c.
138
Figure 4.40 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6d.
139
Figure 4.42 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6d.
140
Figure 4.43 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6e.
141
Figure 4.45 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6e.
142
Figure 4.46 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6f.
143
Figure 4.48 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6f.
144
Figure 4.49 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6g.
145
Figure 4.51 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6g.
146
Figure 4.52 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 6h.
147
Figure 4.54 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 6h.
148
Figure 4.55 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide KSTFC 1c.
149
Figure 4.57 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide KSTFC 1c.
150
Figure 4.59 Mass spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 8a.
151
Figure 4.61 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide CSKFR 1d.
152
Figure 4.63 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide CSKFR 1d.
153
Figure 4.64 Extracted ion chromatogram of cysteine-modified peptide 9a.
154
Figure 4.66 MS/MS spectrum of cysteine-modified peptide 9a.
155
Figure 4.67 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide STSSSANLSK 1e.
156
b-ions 88 198 276 363 450 521 635 748 835
H 2N S T S S S A N L S K COOH
981 894 793 706 619 532 347 234 147 y-ions
157
Figure 4.70 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide STSSSHNLSK 1f.
158
b-ions 88 189 276 363 450 587 673 786 873
H 2N S T S S S H N L S K COOH
960 859 772 685 598 461 347 234 147 y-ions
159
Figure 4.73 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide AYEMWSFHQR 1g.
160
b-ions 72 235 364 495 681 768 915 1052 1180
H 2N A Y E M W S F H Q R COOH
1283 1120 991 860 674 587 440 303 175 y-ions
161
Figure 4.76 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide WSKFR 1h.
162
Figure 4.78 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide WSKFR 1h.
163
Figure 4.79 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide YSKFR 1i.
164
Figure 4.81 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide YSKFR 1i.
165
Figure 4.82 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide PSKFR 1j.
166
Figure 4.84 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide PSKFR 1j.
167
Figure 4.85 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide GSKFR 1k.
168
Figure 4.87 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide GSKFR 1k.
169
Figure 4.88 Extracted ion chromatogram of native peptide ISKFR 1l.
170
Figure 4.90 MS/MS spectrum of native peptide ISKFR 1l.
171
4.23 NMR Spectra
1H NMR
13C NMR
172
1H NMR
13C NMR
173
1H NMR
13C NMR
174
1H NMR
13C NMR
175
19F NMR
176
1H NMR
13C NMR
177
1H NMR
13C NMR
178
19F NMR
179
1H NMR
13C NMR
180
1H NMR
13C NMR
181
1H NMR
13C NMR
182
1H NMR
13C NMR
183
1H NMR
13C NMR
184
1H NMR
13C NMR
185
19F NMR
186
1H NMR
13C NMR
187
1H NMR
13C NMR
188
19F NMR
189
1H NMR
13C NMR
190
1H NMR
13C NMR
191
1H NMR
13C NMR
192
1H NMR
13C NMR
193
1H NMR
13C NMR
194
1H NMR
13C NMR
195
19F NMR
196
1H NMR
13C NMR
197
1H NMR
13C NMR
198
19F NMR
199
1H NMR
13C NMR
200
1H NMR
13C NMR
201
1H NMR
13C NMR
202
1H NMR
13C NMR
203
References
1. Soriano, E.; Fernández, I., Allenes and computational chemistry: from bonding
2. Yu, S.; Ma, S., Allenes in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis and Natural Product
Products and Pharmaceuticals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43 (10), 1196-
1216.
4. Yokota, M.; Fuchibe, K.; Ueda, M.; Mayumi, Y.; Ichikawa, J., Facile
5. (a) Mori, N.; Obuchi, K.; Katae, T.; Sakurada, J.; Satoh, T., Alkenylation of
thiophenes and furans at the 2-position and a synthesis of allenes conjugated with
65 (17), 3509-3517; (b) Satoh, T.; Kaneta, H.; Matsushima, A.; Yajima, M., A
(46), 6280-6285.
204
6. (a) Yu, X.; Ren, H.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J., Efficient Assembly of Allenes, 1,3‐
8485; (b) Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J., Tetrasubstituted allenes by Pd0-catalyzed three-
7. Ma, S.; He, Q.; Jin, X., Tunable 1,3-Lithium Shift of Propargylic/Allenylic
8. (a) Fenández, I.; Monterde, M. I.; Plumet, J., On the base-induced isomerization
(36), 6029-6031; (b) Fotsing, J. R.; Banert, K., First Propargyl Azides
Bearing Strong Acceptor Substituents and Their Effective Conversion into Allenyl
Propargyl Azides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2005 (17), 3704-3714; (c) Lepore, S.
D.; Khoram, A.; Bromfield, D. C.; Cohn, P.; Jairaj, V.; Silvestri, M. A., Studies
Carbonyls. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70 (18), 7443-7446; (d) Brossat, M.; Heck, M.-
205
9. (a) Du, X.; Dai, Y.; He, R.; Lu, S.; Bao, M., New Application of N-
Synth. Comm. 2009, 39 (21), 3940-3949; (b) Sakai, N.; Maruyama, T.;
with Appel-Type Reaction Conditions. Synlett 2009, 2009 (13), 2105-2108; (c) Pu,
X.; Ready, J. M., Direct and Stereospecific Synthesis of Allenes via Reduction of
Propargylic Alcohols with Cp2Zr(H)Cl. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (33), 10874-
10875.
10. (a) Lo, V. K.-Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M., Gold-Catalyzed Highly
Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Allenes. Org. Lett. 2008, 10 (3), 517-
519; (b) Lo, V. K.-Y.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M., Silver(I)-
11. Taylor, D. R., The Chemistry of Allenes. Chem. Rev. 1967, 67 (3), 317-359.
12. Johnson, R. P., Modern Allene Chemistry, Volumes 1−2 Edited by Norbert Krause
Stuttgart, Germany). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim. 2004.
13. Liu, L.; Ward, R. M.; Schomaker, J. M., Mechanistic Aspects and Synthetic
12422-12490.
206
14. Ma, S., Carbopalladation of Allenes. In Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry
for Organic Synthesis, Negishi, E., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2002; pp 1491-1521.
16. Krall, N.; da Cruz, F. P.; Boutureira, O.; Bernardes, G. J. L., Site-selective
17. Xue, L.; Karpenko, I. A.; Hiblot, J.; Johnsson, K., Imaging and manipulating
proteins in live cells through covalent labeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11 (12),
917- 923.
19. Chudasama, V.; Maruani, A.; Caddick, S., Recent advances in the construction
20. Gunnoo, S. B.; Madder, A., Chemical Protein Modification through Cysteine.
207
22. Koniev, O.; Wagner, A., Developments and recent advancements in the field of
23. Tanaka, K.; Fujii, Y.; Fukase, K., Site‐Selective and Nondestructive Protein
24. Tung, C. L.; Wong, C. T. T.; Fung, E. Y. M.; Li, X., Traceless and
25. Matos, M. J.; Oliveira, B. L.; Martínez-Sáez, N.; Guerreiro, A.; Cal, P. M. S.
D.; Bertoldo, J.; Maneiro, M.; Perkins, E.; Howard, J.; Deery, M. J.;
26. (a) Dixon, H. B., Transamination of peptides. Biochem. J. 1964, 92 (3), 661-666;
(b) Dixon, H. B.; Moret, V., Removal of the N-terminal residue of a protein after
27. Kalia, J.; Raines, R. T., Hydrolytic Stability of Hydrazones and Oximes. Angew.
208
28. (a) Gilmore, J. M.; Scheck, R. A.; Esser‐Kahn, A. P.; Joshi, N. S.; Francis,
Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45 (32), 5307-5311; (b) MacDonald,
29. (a) Chan, A. O.-Y.; Ho, C.-M.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Huang, J.-S.;
Peptides and Proteins Using Ketenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (5), 2589-2598;
(b) Chan, W.-K.; Ho, C.-M.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M., Oxidative Amide
30. Chen, D.; Disotuar, M. M.; Xiong, X.; Wang, Y.; Chou, D. H.-C., Selective
(4), 2717-2722.
31. Deng, J.-R.; Lai, N. C.-H.; Kung, K. K.-Y.; Yang, B.; Chung, S.-F.; Leung, A. S.-
L.; Choi, M.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong, M.-K., N-Terminal selective modification
(1), 1-9.
32. (a) Hooker, J. M.; Kovacs, E. W.; Francis, M. B., Interior Surface Modification
of Bacteriophage MS2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (12), 3718-3719; (b) Joshi,
209
N. S.; Whitaker, L. R.; Francis, M. B., A Three-Component Mannich-Type
Reaction for Selective Tyrosine Bioconjugation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (49),
Soc. 2008, 130 (24), 7639-7644; (d) Romanini, D. W.; Francis, M. B., Attachment
Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19 (1), 153-157; (e) Schlick, T. L.; Ding, Z.;
Mosaic Virus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (11), 3718-3723; (f) Tilley, S. D.;
33. (a) Ban, H.; Gavrilyuk, J.; Barbas, C. F., Tyrosine Bioconjugation through
Soc. 2010, 132 (5), 1523-1525; (b) Gavrilyuk, J.; Ban, H.; Nagano, M.;
34. Moelbert, S.; Emberly, E.; Tang, C., Correlation between sequence
210
35. Gevaert, K.; Damme, P. V.; Martens, L.; Vandekerckhove, J., Diagonal
36. (a) Antos, J. M.; Francis, M. B., Selective Tryptophan Modification with Rhodium
Carbenoids in Aqueous Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (33), 10256-10257;
37. Foettinger, A.; Melmer, M.; Leitner, A.; Lindner, W., Reaction of the Indole
38. Seki, Y.; Ishiyama, T.; Sasaki, D.; Abe, J.; Sohma, Y.; Oisaki, K.; Kanai, M.,
Production and Removal of Homocysteine and Cysteine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2004,
24 (1), 539-577.
40. (a) Kramer, J. R.; Deming, T. J., Preparation of Multifunctional and Multireactive
1723; (b) Kramer, J. R.; Deming, T. J., Reversible chemoselective tagging and
211
functionalization of methionine containing peptides. Chem. Commun. 2013,
49 (45), 5144.
41. Lin, S.; Yang, X.; Jia, S.; Weeks, A. M.; Hornsby, M.; Lee, P. S.; Nichiporuk, R.
V.; Iavarone, A. T.; Wells, J. A.; Toste, F. D.; Chang, C. J., Redox-based reagents
602.
42. (a) Lee, K. J.; Kang, D.; Park, H.-S., Site-Specific Labeling of Proteins Using
Unnatural Amino Acids. Mol. Cells 2019, 42 (5), 386-396; (b) Spicer, C. D.; Davis,
B. G., Selective chemical protein modification. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5 (1), 4740.
43. (a) Saxon, E., Cell Surface Engineering by a Modified Staudinger Reaction.
Science 2000, 287 (5460), 2007-2010; (b) Kristi, L. K.; Eliana, S.; David, A. T.;
U.S.A. 2001, 99 (1), 19-24; (c) Tsao, M.-L.; Tian, F.; Schultz, P. G., Selective
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41 (14), 2596-2599; (e) Tornøe, C. W.;
212
44. (a) Agard, N. J.; Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R., A Strain-Promoted [3 + 2]
Living Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (46), 15046-15047; (b) Jeremy, M.
B.; Jennifer, A. P.; Scott, T. L.; Nicholas, J. A.; Pamela, V. C.; Isaac, A. M.;
Anderson, L.; Julian, A. C.; Carolyn, R. B., Copper-free click chemistry for
dynamic in vivo imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104 (43), 16793-
16797; (c) Laughlin, S. T.; Baskin, J. M.; Amacher, S. L.; Bertozzi, C. R., In
2008, 320 (5876), 664-667; (d) Mbua, N. E.; Guo, J.; Wolfert, M. A.; Steet,
1912-1921.
45. (a) Blackman, M. L.; Royzen, M.; Fox, J. M., Tetrazine Ligation: Fast
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (41), 13518-13519; (b) Lang, K.; Davis, L.; Torres-
Kolbus, J.; Chou, C.; Deiters, A.; Chin, J. W., Genetically encoded norbornene
Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (4), 298-304; (c) Lang, K.; Chin, J. W., Bioorthogonal
Reactions for Labeling Proteins. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9 (1), 16-20; (d) Nikić, I.;
Kang, J. H.; Girona, G. E.; Aramburu, I. V.; Lemke, E. A., Labeling proteins
on live mammalian cells using click chemistry. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10 (5), 780-791.
213
46. (a) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Madden, M. M.; Lin, Q., A Photoinducible
Tetrazole-Containing Proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008, 47 (15), 2832-
2835; (b) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Lin, Q., Selective Functionalization of a
Bacterial Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (30), 9654-9655; (c) Yu, Z.; Pan, Y.;
Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Lin, Q., Genetically Encoded Cyclopropene Directs Rapid,
47. Ko, H.-M.; Deng, J.-R.; Cui, J.-F.; Kung, K. K.-Y.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong, M.-K.,
(7), 115375.
48. Poole, L. B., The basics of thiols and cysteines in redox biology and chemistry.
50. Goddard, D. R.; Michaelis, L., Derivatives of Keratin. J. Biol. Chem. 1935, 112.
51. Chalker, J. M.; Wood, C. S. C.; Davis, B. G., A Convenient Catalyst for Aqueous
and Protein Suzuki−Miyaura Cross-Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (45),
16346-16347.
214
52. Goel, N.; Stephens, S., Certolizumab Pegol. mAbs 2010, 2 (2), 137-147.
53. Ellman, G. L., Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. of Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82 (1),
70-77.
54. (a) Bernardes, G. J. L.; Casi, G.; Trüssel, S.; Hartmann, I.; Schwager, K.;
Conjugate for Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51 (4), 941-
944; (b) List, T.; Casi, G.; Neri, D., A chemically defined trifunctional antibody-
cytokine-drug conjugate with potent antitumor activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014,
13 (11), 2641-2652.
55. Dadová, J.; Galan, S. R. G.; Davis, B. G., Synthesis of modified proteins via
56. Chalker, J. M.; Gunnoo, S. B.; Boutureira, O.; Gerstberger, S. C.; Fernández-
González, M.; Bernardes, G. J. L.; Griffin, L.; Hailu, H.; Schofield, C. J.; Davis,
57. Bernardes, G. J. L.; Chalker, J. M.; Errey, J. C.; Davis, B. G., Facile
215
58. (a) Shiu, H. Y.; Chan, T. C.; Ho, C. M.; Liu, Y.; Wong, M. K.; Che, C. M.,
3839-3850; (b) Shiu, H.-Y.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-
and Homocysteine. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16 (11), 3308-3313; (c) Shiu, H.-Y.;
probes for the detection of cysteine and homocysteine. Chem Commun (Camb)
2011, 47 (15), 4367; (d) Shiu, H.-Y.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Zou, T.; Che,
59. Li, G.-L.; Kung, K. K.-Y.; Zou, L.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong, K.-H.;
60. Zhang, C.; Welborn, M.; Zhu, T.; Yang, N. J.; Santos, M. S.; Van Voorhis, T.;
120-128.
61. Matos, M. J.; Navo, C. D.; Hakala, T.; Ferhati, X.; Guerreiro, A.; Hartmann, D.;
Bernardim, B.; Saar, K. L.; Compañón, I.; Corzana, F.; Knowles, T. P. J.; Jiménez-
216
Ultrafast Cysteine-Selective Protein Modification and Charge Modulation.
62. Giles, N. M.; Watts, A. B.; Giles, G. I.; Fry, F. H.; Littlechild, J. A.; Jacob,
C., Metal and Redox Modulation of Cysteine Protein Function. Chem. Biol. 2003,
10 (8), 677-693.
63. (a) Kung, K. K.-Y.; Ko, H.-M.; Cui, J.-F.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong,
Commun. 2014, 50 (80), 11899-11902; (b) Deng, J.-R.; Chung, S.-F.; Leung, A.
S.-L.; Yip, W.-M.; Yang, B.; Choi, M.-C.; Cui, J.-F.; Kung, K. K.-Y.; Zhang, Z.;
64. Vinogradova, E. V.; Zhang, C.; Spokoyny, A. M.; Pentelute, B. L.; Buchwald, S.
65. Chan, A. O.-Y.; Tsai, J. L.-L.; Lo, V. K.-Y.; Li, G.-L.; Wong, M.-K.; Che,
217
66. Abbas, A.; Xing, B.; Loh, T. P., Allenamides as Orthogonal Handles for Selective
Modification of Cysteine in Peptides and Proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
67. Lo, V. K.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M., Gold(III) Salen Complex-
68. Ravasco, J. M. J. M.; Faustino, H.; Trindade, A.; Gois, P. M. P., Bioconjugation
with Maleimides: A Useful Tool for Chemical Biology. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25
(1), 43-59.
for Antibody Conjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53 (40), 10585-
10587.
70. Dougherty, P. G.; Sahni, A.; Pei, D., Understanding Cell Penetration of Cyclic
71. (a) Conte, M. L.; Staderini, S.; Marra, A.; Sanchez-Navarro, M.; Davis, B.
G.; Dondoni, A., Multi-molecule reaction of serum albumin can occur through
thiol-yne coupling. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (39), 11086-11088; (b) Massi, A.;
Nanni, D., Thiol–yne coupling: revisiting old concepts as a breakthrough for up-
218