Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Animals in Brazil Economic Legal and Ethical Perspectives Carlos Naconecy Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Animals in Brazil Economic Legal and Ethical Perspectives Carlos Naconecy Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/animals-and-human-society-in-
asia-historical-cultural-and-ethical-perspectives-rotem-kowner/
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-exports-from-brazil-to-
china-a-legal-and-economic-analysis-dan-wei/
https://textbookfull.com/product/public-and-private-enforcement-
of-competition-law-in-europe-legal-and-economic-perspectives-1st-
edition-kai-huschelrath/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-legal-and-ethical-
environment-of-business-fort/
The European Central Bank as a Sustainability Role
Model: Philosophical, Ethical and Economic Perspectives
Harald Bolsinger
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-european-central-bank-as-a-
sustainability-role-model-philosophical-ethical-and-economic-
perspectives-harald-bolsinger/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ethical-legal-and-professional-
issues-in-counseling-5th-edition-theodore-p-remley-jr/
https://textbookfull.com/product/epigenetics-ethical-legal-and-
social-aspects-1st-edition-reinhard-heil/
https://textbookfull.com/product/understanding-workplace-
bullying-an-ethical-and-legal-perspective-devi-akella/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-second-chance-for-europe-
economic-political-and-legal-perspectives-of-the-european-
union-1st-edition-jo-ritzen-eds/
THE PALGRAVE MACMILLAN
ANIMAL ETHICS SERIES
Animals In Brazil
Economic, Legal and
Ethical Perspectives
Edited by
Carlos Naconecy
The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series
Series Editors
Andrew Linzey
Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics
Oxford, UK
Priscilla N. Cohn
Pennsylvania State University
Villanova, PA, USA
Associate Editor
Clair Linzey
Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics
Oxford, UK
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the ethics of our
treatment of animals. Philosophers have led the way, and now a range
of other scholars have followed from historians to social scientists. From
being a marginal issue, animals have become an emerging issue in ethics
and in multidisciplinary inquiry. This series will explore the challenges
that Animal Ethics poses, both conceptually and practically, to tradi-
tional understandings of human-animal relations. Specifically, the Series
will:
• provide a range of key introductory and advanced texts that map out
ethical positions on animals
• publish pioneering work written by new, as well as accomplished,
scholars;
• produce texts from a variety of disciplines that are multidisciplinary
in character or have multidisciplinary relevance.
Animals In Brazil
Economic, Legal and Ethical
Perspectives
Editor
Carlos Naconecy
Porto Alegre, Brazil
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse
of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by
similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained
herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with
regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Pivot imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Series Editors’ Preface
This is a new book series for a new field of inquiry: Animal Ethics.
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the ethics of our
treatment of animals. Philosophers have led the way, and now a range
of other scholars have followed from historians to social scientists. From
being a marginal issue, animals have become an emerging issue in ethics
and in multidisciplinary inquiry.
In addition, a rethink of the status of animals has been fuelled by a
range of scientific investigations which have revealed the complexity of
animal sentiency, cognition, and awareness. The ethical implications of
this new knowledge have yet to be properly evaluated, but it is becom-
ing clear that the old view that animals are mere things, tools, machines,
or commodities cannot be sustained ethically.
But it is not only philosophy and science that are putting animals
on the agenda. Increasingly, in Europe and the United States, animals
are becoming a political issue as political parties vie for the “green” and
“animal” vote. In turn, political scientists are beginning to look again at
the history of political thought in relation to animals, and historians are
beginning to revisit the political history of animal protection.
v
vi Series Editors’ Preface
• provide a range of key introductory and advanced texts that map out
ethical positions on animals;
• publish pioneering work written by new, as well as accomplished,
scholars, and
• produce texts from a variety of disciplines that are multidisciplinary
in character or have multidisciplinary relevance.
The publisher thanks Prof. Tagore Trajano for his comments on parts of
the manuscript.
ix
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Carlos Naconecy
Index 119
xi
Notes on Contributors
Chapter 2
Fig. 1 Evolution of the annual availability of chicken,
beef, and pork (in kilograms) per person in Brazil
(Sources Associação Brasileira de Exportadores
de Carne [ABIEC], Associação Brasileira de Criadores
de Suínos [ABCS], Associação Brasileira de Proteína
Animal [ABPA]) 9
Fig. 2 Evolution of the number of land animals slaughtered
in Brazil per year (Source FAOSTAT—livestock primary) 11
Fig. 3 Terrestrial biomes—distribution map for Brazil
(Source NASA [public domain file]) 18
Fig. 4 Top 10 dietary risk factors associated with health loss
(Years lived with Disability [YLD]) due to cardiovascular
disease, diabetes mellitus and neoplasms in Brazil across
all year in 2016 (Source Global Burden of Disease Study,
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation [IHME]) 23
xv
1
Introduction
Carlos Naconecy
C. Naconecy (*)
Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, Oxford, UK
© The Author(s) 2019 1
C. Naconecy (ed.), Animals In Brazil, The Palgrave Macmillan
Animal Ethics Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23377-8_1
2
C. Naconecy
The book that you are now reading presents a collection of essays on
some of the main aspects of human–animal interaction in Brazil. The
project that culminated in this work began in September 2014, when
Andrew Linzey, director of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, asked
if I would be interested in taking further the idea of an anthology on
the situation of animals in Brazil. Later, Clair Linzey, while visiting
Brazil on account of her doctoral research, encouraged me to make this
project a reality.
In terms of the circumstances of animals, Brazil’s crucial role in the
international scenario is not hard to explain. We know that around 99%
of all animals with which humans interact are animals destined to be
eaten. And Brazil has a strong vocation for livestock production. The
country occupies a privileged position in the global meat supply chain.
The largest meat processing company in the world, JBS, is Brazilian.
Brazil usually ranks among the top three positions as global exporter
and producer of beef and chicken; there are almost as many cattle as
there are people in the country. Brazil’s ecological responsibility on this
planet is also immense: it is home to the world’s largest rainforest, the
Amazon—and over 80% of the deforestation of this area, which hosts
the greatest biodiversity on earth, is due to cattle breeding.
For these reasons, among others, Brazil’s worldwide importance for
animal life seems unquestionable. Anyone who has even the slightest
interest in the circumstances of animals at the international level must
take into account what this country has—and, most importantly, what
it has not—done about this. This book aims to shed light on the legal,
economic, socio-environmental, and ethical dimensions of this problem.
As for the ethical dimension of the “animal issue”, the key question
is: are we, human beings, justified in using and abusing animals as we
have historically been doing? Or is there more to be taken into account,
to the extent of demanding a change in this behaviour on the basis of
morality? Such reflection is still very recent compared to the other fields
of human thought. Although there have been isolated manifestations
throughout history, beginning in ancient times, it was only in the 1970s
that moral reasoning about the way we treat animals received a new and
vigorous impetus. This movement, led by Anglo-Saxon philosophers,
has since produced a plethora of literary works in different disciplines.
1 Introduction
3
About thirty years elapsed until this movement reached the Brazilian
community and intellectuals. More markedly in the last decade, books
in the national language have begun to be published, specialized jour-
nals released in the academic field, and graduate programs integrated
into university curricula.1
As in other countries, Brazilian society also believes that the life and
welfare of animals is morally important, at least to some extent. But,
as in other countries, the topic of debate is what we can deduct from
this moral importance or status in terms of our own obligations. In
other words, what kind of moral duties does animal welfare/animal life
impose upon us. Furthermore, since the country has the second largest
population of cats and dogs in the world, part of the Brazilian society
also wonders about the difference in moral treatment between pets and
animals used as food or for experimentation.
It is correct to say that ethical sensitivity toward the treatment of ani-
mals in Brazil has taken the form of a growing spiral. The increase in
public and academic interest in the ways we treat animals has grown
consistently in recent years in this country. There have never been so
many academic conferences and university courses dedicated to animal
topics as there are now in Brazil. Public debate is also intensifying. It
is clear that we are facing a global trend that has already reached our
country. It is clear that this national movement is part of a worldwide
critical mass of moral reflection that is, therefore, more comprehensive.
The issue, however, is not restricted only to ethics and to respect for
animals. There are other dimensions to be considered. When we raise
animals for food, for example, we are not only creating problems for
the animals themselves. This activity also entails serious social and envi-
ronmental problems, be they on a micro or macro scale. The impacts of
the Brazilian meat industry on climate, deforestation, loss of biodiver-
sity, excessive water use, land degradation, concentration of land own-
ership, invasion of indigenous lands, contaminant waste management,
slave labor, and food security are already well known and documented.
As a matter of fact, livestock farming is the largest emitter of green-
house gases in Brazil. Extensive livestock production, in which the ani-
mals are not confined as they are in industrial farming, predominates in
the country: less than 2% of the total herd is confined. Although this
4
C. Naconecy
The last section, entitled “Factors That Influence the Brazilian Ethos
Regarding Animals”, deals with certain historical, sociocultural, and
economic aspects that supposedly influence the Brazilian ethos regard-
ing the morality of the treatment of animals. The first of these is the
legacy of the Brazilian slave-owning past. The second characteristic is
the strong presence of emotivity and passion in Brazilian popular psy-
chology, to the detriment of rationality and objectivity, and how this
affects public debates in Brazil. The third factor is the absence of the
habit of engaging in social protest in favor of ethics and worthy causes.
The fourth trait is the influence of Catholic doctrine in the country. The
last point is the impact of adverse social circumstances on the moral
desensitization of the population to the situation of animals—especially
commonplace violence, social exclusion, and poverty in Brazil.
I wish to thank all the collaborators for their contributions to this
volume, since unpublished texts were written especially for this project.
I hope this work will help professionals, researchers, and graduate stu-
dents become more familiar with the current Brazilian panorama involv-
ing the treatment of animals in the country. Readers will realize that the
animal issue in Brazil, as in other countries, also has its own potentiali-
ties, contradictions, and limitations. I trust that readers will develop at
least a bare notion of such complexity, and will henceforth be able to
deepen their interest (and perhaps involvement) in such an important
and urgent topic.
Note
1. The concern over animal welfare in the academic field, initially in the
departments of Veterinary, first arose in the 1990s in Brazil. According
to the researcher Vânia Rall, in a private conversation, the initial mile-
stone of the defense of animals in Brazilian society took place in 1895,
when the NGO International Union for the Protection of Animals
(UIPA, in Portuguese) was founded in São Paulo. As in other coun-
tries, with the advent of the Internet, local NGOs have promoted the
disclosure of facts to the Brazilian public about nationwide animal mal-
treatment, the harmful consequences of livestock farming and of meat
consumption.
2
Food Animals in Brazil:
Five Decades of Transformation
Cynthia Schuck Paim and Marly Winckler
C. S. Paim (*)
Cartagena, Spain
e-mail: cynthia.paim@wolfson.oxon.org
M. Winckler
Florianópolis, Brazil
© The Author(s) 2019 7
C. Naconecy (ed.), Animals In Brazil, The Palgrave Macmillan
Animal Ethics Series, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23377-8_2
8
C. S. Paim and M. Winckler
son stayed in the region where the village once was: he works for one of
the large pork processing plants in the state. Maria does not visit him
often: a trip to the west takes several hours by bus, not so easy to stand
in her mid-70s. So on special occasions, the family reunites in the cap-
ital. It’s Friday, and Maria is fixing her grandchildren some dinner. She
grabs some chicken nuggets and sausages from the fridge and serves
them with mashed potatoes and salad. Ice-cream is in order for dessert.
They still eat rice and beans regularly, but as with most middle-class
families, meat, eggs, and dairy are now part of their every meal.
While the ethnicities and landscapes vary, the story of Maria is
similar to that of millions of Brazilians over the last decades. Until
recently, meat was the sporadic treat on weekends and special occasions,
or a condiment used in small amounts to add flavor to the daily sta-
ples. Today, the annual availability of meat per person in this middle-
income country is higher than 100 kilograms (of which 90 kilograms
of chicken, pork and beef and 15 kilograms of fish; Fig. 1)—nearly
300 grams every day. Over 80% of the population in the country cur-
rently lives in urban centers, compared to only 45% in 1960. At the
Fig. 1 Evolution of the annual availability of chicken, beef, and pork (in kilo-
grams) per person in Brazil (Sources Associação Brasileira de Exportadores de
Carne [ABIEC], Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Suínos [ABCS], Associação
Brasileira de Proteína Animal [ABPA])
10
C. S. Paim and M. Winckler
same time, per capita income has grown tremendously, from USD 260
in 1965 to USD 8750 in 2015.1 Nowadays, more people suffer from
the maladies that come associated with obesity than from hunger and
undernutrition. At the same time, the abrupt decline in infant mortality
rates has translated into a rapid increase in population size. Even though
average fertility rates declined from an average of 6.2–1.8 children per
woman, in five decades Brazil has gone from a population of about 70
million to over 200 million people.2
These trends are to be celebrated, along with the lives of literally mil-
lions of Brazilian citizens who made these social achievements possible.
Ensuring access to enough food to nearly all 200 million Brazilians has
been surely no small feat. Yet not all progress has been without a price.
In this chapter, we focus on the profound transformations in the con-
sumption and production of animal-sourced foods that took place over
the last five decades in Brazil, their main drivers, and the impacts on
the life of animals, on the health of the population, and on the environ-
ment. The impacts of animal agriculture in Brazil in the last five decades
are typical of similar transformations in other countries and currently
underway in other regions of the world, particularly in rapidly evolving
countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. We finish by evaluating future
trends for the livestock industry in Brazil, how these trends may affect
the lives of billions of animals in the decades to come, and possible ways
forward.
Fig. 2 Evolution of the number of land animals slaughtered in Brazil per year
(Source FAOSTAT—livestock primary)
12
C. S. Paim and M. Winckler
boosted the growth of the animal feed sector. Soybean production, for
example, skyrocketed from 0.2 to over 80 million metric tons between
1960 and 2015.7 Formal credit programs also led to an increase in land
prices and, by extension, land concentration.8 Moreover, research and
technology development in the sector received a large impetus with the
creation of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)
in 1973, a research arm of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and
Food Supply dedicated to booster productivity and enable agricultural
expansion into unexplored areas, including the Brazilian savanna known
as cerrado.
The government-led industrialization of the livestock sector in Brazil
since the 1960s was also characterized by the increasing vertical inte-
gration of the production system, particularly in the poultry and pork
industries. In this system, integrators provide growers with so-called
technological packages, namely a set of products and services including
veterinary care, technical assistance, specific feed formulations and ani-
mals selectively bred for maximum performance (product yield) within
this system. Growers raise the animals that are then sold to integrators,
often for a price based on food conversion efficiencies, namely the effi-
ciency with which the feed provided by the integrators is converted into
meat, dairy, and eggs.9 The system has therefore direct incentives for
ever-increasing per-animal production.
As in other countries, the last decades have also witnessed the
increasing concentration of the meat industry in Brazil. This has hap-
pened both through the technological intensification of meat produc-
tion, which made it hard for independent producers to compete in this
market, and the concentration of the market into the hands of a few
companies through a series of mergers and acquisitions. In the poultry
industry, two multinational companies (JBS and BRF) now account for
50% of all animals slaughtered in the country and 70% of the export
volume. A similar situation is observed in the pork industry, where
three companies (BRF, JBS, and Aurora), together account for nearly
half of the Brazilian production.10 The concentration of the market was
particularly pronounced in the last decade, with the most illustrative
example being that of JBS: it jumped from a turnover of BRL 3.5 bil-
lion (USD 1 billion) in 2004 to BRL 120 billion (USD 34 billion) in
2 Food Animals in Brazil …
13
thinking about the origins of their food) would be nearly impossible for
the average factory-farmed animal of today.
The welfare and health costs bore by animals used as food source in
Brazil can be grasped by considering how their physiologies were trans-
formed over the last decades. In the Brazilian pork industry, female
breeding age dropped from 8 to 4 months, with the number of pig-
lets per litter jumping from 7–8 to an average of 10–13,15 often more
than the number of functional teats of a female (cross-fostering is thus
a standard nowadays). Three weeks after birth, piglets are prematurely
removed from their mothers (under natural conditions, weaning occurs
gradually, at 2–3 months), who are then artificially inseminated again
just one week later. Today, the average commercial sow in Brazil pro-
duces more than 30 piglets per year, and is culled at 2.5–3 years of age,
when the accumulation of reproductive, locomotory, and metabolic
problems have already crippled their health. In the dairy industry, milk
production per cow increased fivefold in four decades16—nowadays,
a regular lactating cow can produce more than 10 liters per day, com-
pared to an average of less than 2 liters in the mid-70s (just enough to
feed their babies). More extreme changes were observed in the Brazilian
poultry industry.17 Among broiler chickens, average daily weight gain
has more than tripled since 1930, jumping from about 15 grams per
day to over 60 grams per day in 2015 (almost 3% of their final body
weight). At the same time, age at slaughter has reduced from 105 to
only 40 days: much heavier chickens are now slaughtered at much
younger ages. Perhaps even more impressive is the case of commercial
laying hens, which in Brazil went from production of about 80 eggs per
year in 1910 (already high compared to a laying frequency of up to 1
egg per month in its ancestral, the red jungle fowl) to over 340 eggs per
year in 2010.
Over-selection for prolificity, rapid muscle growth, egg and milk pro-
duction took a heavy toll on the health and welfare of animals, with
a high incidence of metabolic, bone and joint disorders, among other
anatomical and physiological illnesses associated with pain and chronic
suffering.18,19 Many of these illnesses have been referred to as “pro-
duction diseases”, defined as those diseases that typically become more
prevalent or severe in proportion to the potential productivity of the
2 Food Animals in Brazil …
15
system.20 Laying hens now suffer from osteoporosis and bone fractures:
their systems were pushed so hard to produce more eggs that most
calcium and minerals are removed from their bones.21 Meat chickens
suffer from all sorts of leg abnormalities and lameness (a painful condi-
tion that constraints, and sometimes prevent, movement)—most spend
their lives lying down. Gain of muscle mass is so rapid that the growth
of bones and internal organs cannot keep pace with it; heart failure and
respiratory insufficiency are common observations in poultry flocks.22
Lameness is also a reality for dairy cows and pigs. Breeding animals,
who give birth to the animals sold for meat, have it even tougher:
their offspring must grow very rapidly, eating as much as possible dur-
ing their short lives and growing so fast that when they get closer to
the slaughter age their physiologies are close to collapse. Breeding par-
ents have, for obvious reasons, the same genetics for fast growth and
appetite. Yet they need to survive much longer, reach sexual maturity
and reproduce. To make survival possible, they are fed only a fraction
of the calories they were selected to crave—chronic hunger is their
routine.23,24
In addition to selection and management for high productivity, other
means to reduce production costs have also included the confinement
of animals at high densities, in closed barren environments that prevent
them from fulfilling basic behavioral, physiological and psychological
needs.25 In some cases, confinement has reached extreme levels, with
typical examples including the use of gestation and farrowing crates for
breeding sows (where females are not even able to turn their bodies)
and battery cages where laying hens cannot open their wings or stand
at normal walking height. In loose indoor housing systems, on the other
hand, the high levels of dust and ammonia in the air commonly lead
to eyes and skin problems and lung pathologies.26 Palliative measures
to prevent aggression and physical harm—a widespread by-product of
the chronic stress associated with poor living conditions—have been
commonly employed and now are the industry standard. These include
mutilations such as the extraction of teeth, horns, tails, and beaks (over-
whelmingly performed without anesthetics). Poor welfare conditions
associated with poor immune function has also increased susceptibil-
ity to disease—routinely managed with the use of antibiotics in large
16
C. S. Paim and M. Winckler
A piece of sheet metal, B, is cut to fit the space between the wires,
allowing projections at the upper and lower outside edges for
bending around the upright twisted wires. The entire stove can be
nickelplated if desired. It can be used in the same manner as an
electric stove and for the same purposes where a home is supplied
only with gas.—Contributed by E. L. Douthett, Kansas City, Mo.
Castings without Patterns
The sketch shows a method of making small castings that I have
used for several years and the castings so produced are strong and
very durable, almost equal to the ordinary casting. The idea may be
of considerable value to inventors and home mechanics.
A Mold Made in Plaster without a Special Pattern and Run with a Soft Metal
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Fig. 3 Fig. 4
Parts for Making the Switch So That It will Operate Automatically as the
Cover is Moved
I first secured an ordinary soap box and took it apart, being careful
to keep the boards whole, then rebuilt it to make a box with ends
measuring 12 in. square, and 14 in. in length. In one end I cut a large
hole to admit a 60-watt tungsten globe, then, taking another board, I
fitted a knob and hinges to it and used it for a door. The other end of
the box was centered and a hole bored large enough to admit an
ordinary socket. Another hole was bored, 4 in. to the right, for
another socket. A much heavier material was used for the lid than for
the box, being at least ⁷⁄₈ in. thick. A piece of double-strength, clear
glass, 8 by 10 in. in size, was procured and set in a hole cut in the
cover so that its upper surface would be flush.
The Printer may be Set in the Table Top or Used Separately, as Desired
Side View of the Printer, Showing Parts Assembled and the Main Line
Connections to the Globes
Many times one has use for an eyebolt when there is none at
hand. Eyebolts of almost any size can be quickly made of a spring
cotter. Simply thread the end, as shown, and use a nut and washer.
—Contributed by Chas. G. England, Washington, Pa.
To Keep Tan Shoes from Turning Dark
Tan-shoe polishes seem to rub the dirt into the leather and to
darken it in a short time. Tan shoes can be kept clean and well
polished without losing their original bright tan color if treated in the
following simple manner. Instead of using tan polish on a new pair of
shoes, dampen the end of a soft clean cloth, and rub a small portion
of the leather at a time with the moist end and then rub briskly with
the dry end. In this way tan shoes can be kept clean and nicely
polished like new.—Contributed by John V. Voorhis, Ocean Grove,
N. J.
A Finger-Trap Trick
It is easy to fool one’s friends with the little joker made to trap a
finger. It consists of a piece of paper, about 6 in. wide and 12 in. or
more long. To prepare the paper, cut two slots in one end, as shown,
and then roll it up to tube form, beginning at the end with the cuts,
then fasten the end with glue. The inside diameter should be about
¹⁄₂ inch.
It is Easy to Insert a Finger in the Tube, but to Get It Out is Almost
Impossible
When the glue is dry, ask some one to push a finger into either
end. This will be easy enough to do, but to remove the finger is a
different matter. The end coils tend to pull out and hold the finger. If
the tube is made of tough paper, it will stand considerable pull.—
Contributed by Abner B. Shaw, N. Dartmouth, Mass.
Wheels Fitted into the Ends of a Long Board, to Make a Roller Skate
The long wheel base of the roller skate illustrated makes it quite
safe and will prevent falls. The construction of these skates is
simple, the frame being made of a board, 2 ft. long, 3 in. wide and 1
in. thick. Holes are mortised through the ends to admit the wheels. A
small block, cut out on one side to fit the heel of the shoe, is securely
fastened centrally, for width, and just in front of the rear wheel on the
board. Two leather straps are fastened to one side of each board, to
fasten the skate onto the shoe. The wheels can be turned from hard
wood, or small metal wheels may be purchased, as desired. The
axle for the wheels consists of a bolt run through a hole bored in the
edge of the board centrally with the mortise.—Contributed by Walter
Veene, San Diego, Cal.
¶The screw collar of a vise should be oiled at least once a month.
How to Make a High Stool
The cast-off handles of four old brooms, three pieces of board, cut
as shown, and a few screws will make a substantial high stool. The
legs should be placed in the holes, as shown at A, and secured with
screws turned through the edge of the board into the legs in the
holes. The seat B should be fastened over this and the legs braced