Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Antifungal Therapy Second Edition Ghannoum Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Antifungal Therapy Second Edition Ghannoum Ebook Full Chapter
Ghannoum
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/antifungal-therapy-second-edition-ghannoum/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/brief-dynamic-therapy-second-
edition-levenson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-
second-edition-american-psychological-association/
https://textbookfull.com/product/best-practices-for-occupational-
therapy-in-schools-second-edition-edition-gloria-frolek-clark/
https://textbookfull.com/product/preparing-for-the-occupational-
therapy-national-board-exam-second-edition-rosanne-dizazzo-
miller/
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for OCD and Its Subtypes
Second Edition David A. Clark
https://textbookfull.com/product/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-
for-ocd-and-its-subtypes-second-edition-david-a-clark/
https://textbookfull.com/product/existential-humanistic-therapy-
theories-of-psychotherapy-series-second-edition-kirk-j-schneider/
https://textbookfull.com/product/practicing-medicine-without-a-
license-the-story-of-the-linus-pauling-therapy-for-heart-disease-
second-edition-pauling-therapy-handbook-book-1-owen-fonorow/
https://textbookfull.com/product/think-good-feel-good-a-
cognitive-behavioural-therapy-workbook-for-children-and-young-
people-second-edition-stallard/
https://textbookfull.com/product/introducing-cognitive-analytic-
therapy-principles-and-practice-of-a-relational-approach-to-
mental-health-second-edition-edition-anthony-ryle/
Antifungal Therapy
Second Edition
Edited by
Mahmoud A. Ghannoum
John R. Perfect
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
52 Vanderbilt Avenue,
New York, NY 10017
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and informa-
tion, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic,
mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the
Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses
and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been
arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without
intent to infringe.
Names: Ghannoum, Mahmoud A. (Mahmoud Afif), editor. | Perfect, John R., 1949- editor.
Title: Antifungal therapy / [edited by] Mahmoud Ghannoum, John R. Perfect.
Description: Second edition. | New York, NY : CRC Press, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018033731| ISBN 9781498768146 (hardback : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780429402012 (ebook)
Subjects: | MESH: Mycoses--drug therapy | Antifungal Agents--therapeutic use
Classification: LCC RM410 | NLM WC 450 | DDC 615.7/92--dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018033731
Preface v
Editors vii
Contributors ix
1 History of antifungals 1
Emily L. Larkin, Ali Abdul Lattif Ali, and Kim Swindell
2 Epidemiology of fungal infections: What, where, and when 11
Frederic Lamoth, Sylvia F. Costa, and Barbara D. Alexander
3 Experimental animal models of invasive fungal infections 49
Christopher L. Hager, Lisa Long, Yoshifumi Imamura, and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum
4 Antifungal drug resistance: Significance and mechanisms 63
Sharvari Dharmaiah, Rania A. Sherif, and Pranab K. Mukherjee
5 Antifungal prophylaxis: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure 87
Aimee K. Zaas
6 Preemptive antifungal therapy: Do diagnostics help? 97
Vidya Jagadeesan, Margaret Powers-Fletcher, and Kimberly E. Hanson
7 The immune response to fungal challenge 115
Jeffery Hu and Jeffery J. Auletta
8 Immunomodulators: What is the evidence for use in mycoses? 131
J. Andrew Alspaugh
9 Fungal biofilms and catheter-associated infections 143
Jyotsna Chandra and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum
10 Polyenes for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections 155
Richard H. Drew
11 Flucytosine 177
Richard H. Drew
12 Pharmacology of azole antifungal agents 193
Elizabeth S. Dodds Ashley
13 Echinocandins for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections 213
Melissa D. Johnson, John Mohr, and Ahmad Mourad
14 Novel methods of antifungal administration 239
Richard H. Drew
15 Dermatophytosis 257
Mahmoud A. Ghannoum, Iman Salem, and Nancy Isham
16 Invasive candidiasis 273
Richard R. Watkins and Tracy Lemonovich
17 Invasive aspergillosis 287
Frank Esper
18 Management of cryptococcosis 301
John R. Perfect and Ahmad Mourad
iii
iv Contents
Index 517
Preface
This book is designed to provide a comprehensive but personal opinions and experiences. Fungal infections are
insightful examination of antifungal therapy in the changing treated “one patient at a time,” and there is no “cookbook
clinical milieu of modern medicine. It is an update from recipe” that fits all patients all the time. In fact, the under-
the original work almost a decade ago. It is clear that as lying disease simply gets in the way too often or our
medicine advances to treat and cure severe underlying evidence-based material is either weak or non-existent.
diseases, the collateral consequences of this management Finally, we conclude with the management of several risk
can be immunosuppression and opportunistic fungal infec- groups, or unique patient populations or infection sites,
tions. Furthermore, there are a series of primary fungal and their fungal infections. It is not an exhaustive list but
infections, such as dermatophytosis and endemic mycoses, provides illustrative exposure to these patients. It also lays
which continue to plague normal hosts. Additionally, the the ground work/foundation for the principles of man-
pandemic of HIV, which has impacted the entire world, laid aging other risk groups which occur today or may occur
in its immunosuppressive path the rise of invasive mycoses. tomorrow.
It is clear that most clinicians who care for the seriously Fungal diseases have risen to prominence over the last
sick will be faced at times with the appearance of a fungal 50 years. They have paralleled the technological advances
infection and a need to manage its disease. There are many in the care of serious medical diseases. Fungi, as eukaryotic
aspects of invasive mycoses, including genetic susceptibil- organisms, play an interesting role in the human condition.
ity, risk factor predictions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and They have been harnessed to help make our bread and bev-
outcome of underlying diseases, that require a present and erages. In fact, we eat some of them and, during the traffic of
future knowledge base for medical practice. In this book, life, we are constantly exposed to millions of them. During
we have attempted to focus the presentation on the updated health, they are rarely a problem for us and after death they
management aspects of fungal diseases. With the rising degrade us. Many of our critical exposures for health and
number of fungal infections worldwide and the develop- fungi come between these stations of life. It is in this arena
ment and clinical use of a variety of antifungal agents, it is as a “human petri dish” that fungal disease raises its ugly
quite clear that the statement: “Amphotericin B is the gold consequences. It is the hope of these authors that this book
standard for the invasive mycoses” is no longer true. We reveals the tools, strategies, and insights to manage these
have safer and effective alternative drugs to use. It is our irritating, costly, and life-threatening infections, and they
mission in this book to provide clinicians with a foundation have updated them to meet the rapidly changing clinical
and insights into current antifungal management and the landscape. At times, it may seem the patient is defenseless
second edition has allowed us the ability to revisit the sub- against these marauders, but, in fact, present antifungal
jects as they have changed over the last decade. The book therapy is very good and applied early and correctly can
has repeated the original list of topics. make a difference in patient outcome. This success story is
First, we approach some general antifungal agent issues, told in the following pages. In this second edition, we have
from the history of antifungal agents, fungal epidemiol- made an effort to insightfully update the fast-moving field
ogy, antifungal agent preclinical development to drug over the last decade, so all available tools and principles are
resistance. Second, we examine in depth the antifungal recognized. Vulnerable patients continue to integrate into
classes of drugs. Third, there is an attempt to provide the fabric of modern medicine; thus, invasive fungal dis-
clinical management issues and strategies around specific eases consistently follow these patients. From the specialists
fungal infections that the clinician may face frequently or to the generalists, we must “all be in” when it comes to suc-
rarely, depending on the patient population in their prac- cessful management of fungal diseases.
tice. In these sections, there are insights provided into
dosing, choice of drugs, concerns about complications, Mahmoud A. Ghannoum
and outcomes, which are evidence-based but mixed with John R. Perfect
v
Editors
Mahmoud A. Ghannoum, PhD, MBA, FIDSA, FAAM John R. Perfect, MD, is James B. Duke Professor of Medicine
joined Case Western Reserve University and University at Duke University Medical Center, a faculty member of the
Hospitals Case Medical Center in 1996 from prior positions Duke University Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, and
at the UCLA School of Medicine and Kuwait University. director of the Duke University Mycology Research Unit.
Dr. Ghannoum has spent his entire academic career studying He is chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases in the
medically important fungi encompassing different fungal Department of Medicine at Duke Medical Center. Dr. Perfect
pathogens including Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus, is a diplomat of the American Board of Internal Medicine and
the major causes of fungal infections. He has published more American Board of Infectious Diseases. After receiving an
than 350 peer-reviewed articles addressing various aspects of undergraduate degree in biology from Wittenberg University,
superficial and systemic fungal infections. More recently, he Dr. Perfect went on to receive a medical degree from the
published the first study describing the oral mycobiome of Medical College of Ohio at Toledo. He then completed an
healthy individuals. He has published extensively in the area internship at the Riverside Methodist Hospital in Columbus,
of fungal pathogenesis with special focus on virulence factors Ohio; a residency in internal medicine at the University of
including phospholipase B, germination, adhesion, and bio- Michigan Medical Center in Ann Arbor; and a fellowship in
film formation, both in vitro and in vivo. Dr. Ghannoum is infectious diseases at Duke University Medical Center. He is
a professor and director of the Center for Medical Mycology a fellow of the American Society for Microbiology and the
at Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Infectious Diseases Society of America. Dr. Perfect is also
Case Medical Center. This center of excellence, which he a fellow of the American Association for Advancement of
directs, is a multidisciplinary center that combines basic and Science and member of International Society for Human and
translational research investigating fungi from the test tube Animal Mycology, and Immunocompromised Host Society
to the bedside. He has performed several studies investigat- (ISHAM). He is president of the Mycoses Study Group and
ing the mechanisms underlying Candida pathogenesis. He is Educational Research Consortium and president-elect of
the recipient of the Freedom to Discover Award from Bristol- ISHAM. Dr. Perfect has served on numerous committees
Myers Squibb and the Rhoda Benham Award from the and advisory boards. He received the Rhoda Benham Award
Medical Mycological Society of the Americas. He served as a from Medical Mycology Society of the Americas and the
chairman of the Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Lucille Georg Award from ISHAM. Dr. Perfect’s research
Testing, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, and was interests focus on the understanding of fungal pathogene-
selected as a “Most Interesting Person” by Cleveland Magazine sis through the study of Cryptococcus neoformans as well as
in 2013. Dr. Ghannoum is an entrepreneur-scientist who has clinical studies on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and manage-
launched a number of companies focusing on the treatment ment of invasive mycoses.
of biofilm infections and microbial dysbiosis as it relates to
gut health. He coined the term ‘Mycobiome’.
vii
Contributors
Jeffery J. Auletta
Hematology/Oncology/BMT & Infectious Diseases Richard H. Drew
Nationwide Children’s Hospital Duke University School of Medicine
and Durham, North Carolina
Clinical Pediatrics and
The Ohio State University College of Medicine Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health
The James Comprehensive Cancer Center Sciences
Columbus, Ohio Buies Creek, North Carolina
ix
x Contributors
Nancy Isham
Center for Medical Mycology Lisa Long
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Center for Medical Mycology
Case Western Reserve University University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio
Vidya Jagadeesan
Clinical Microbiology John Mohr
ARUP Laboratories Medical Affairs Strategic Solutions, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah Acton, Massachusetts
Contributors xi
Iman Salem
Pranab K. Mukherjee
Center for Medical Mycology
Department of Dermatology
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Center of Medical Mycology
Case Western Reserve University
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio
Rania A. Sherif
Center for Medical Mycology
John R. Perfect University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Division of Infectious Diseases Case Western Reserve University
Department of Medicine Cleveland, Ohio
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina William J. Steinbach
Department of Pediatrics
and
Melanie W. Pound
Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology
Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health
Duke University Medical Center
Sciences
Durham, North Carolina
Buies Creek, North Carolina
and
Kim Swindell
New Hanover Regional Medical Center
Martinsburg, Pennsylvania
Wilmington, North Carolina
Mary L. Townsend
Margaret Powers-Fletcher Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Sciences
College of Medicine Buies Creek, North Carolina
University of Cincinnati and
Cincinnati, Ohio Durham Veterans Administration Health Care
System
Durham, North Carolina
Raymond R. Rackley
Surgery
Richard R. Watkins
Glickman Urology and Kidney Institute
Division of Infectious Diseases
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case
Cleveland Clinic Akron General
Western Reserve University
Akron, Ohio
Cleveland, Ohio
and
Northeast Ohio Medical University
Daniel R. Richardson Rootstown, Ohio
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Department of Internal Medicine Aimee K. Zaas
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Division of Infectious Diseases
Chapel Hill, North Carolina Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina
1
History of antifungals
1
2 History of antifungals
ANTIFUNGALS FOR THE TREATMENT Nystatin exhibited good activity against Candida and mod-
OF INVASIVE INFECTIONS est activity against Aspergillus species.
In aqueous solutions, nystatin forms aggregates that
Polyenes are toxic to mammalian cells both in vitro and in vivo. The
insolubility and toxicity precluded its use as an intravenous
In 1946, polyene antifungals (Figure 1.1), which are effective therapy for systemic mycoses.
against organisms with sterol-containing cell membranes Subsequently, (NyotranOR), a more soluble liposomal
(e.g., yeast, algae, and protozoa), were developed from the nystatin formulation with reduced toxicity was developed
fermentation of Streptomyces [17,18]. These drugs disrupt [25]. The liposomal formulation consists of a freeze-dried,
the fungal cell membrane by binding to ergosterol, the main solid dispersion of nystatin mixed with a dispersing agent,
cell fungal membrane sterol moiety. As a result, holes form such as a poloxamer or polysorbate [26,27]. The dispersing
in the membrane allowing leakage of essential cytoplasmic agent prevents aggregate formation in solution, increasing
materials, such as potassium, leading to cell death. From the the drug’s solubility and decreasing toxicity while main-
1950s until the advent of effective azole compounds in the taining efficacy [27,28]. Liposomal nystatin has good activ-
1960s, polyene antifungal agents were standard therapy for ity in vitro against a variety of Candida species, including
systemic fungal infections [19]. some amphotericin B–resistant isolates [28].
Studies by Oakley et al. [29] showed that NyotranOR
NYSTATIN was more effective than liposomal amphotericin against
In 1949, while conducting research at the Division Aspergillus species. Although the liposomal form of nystatin
of Laboratories and Research of the New York State was less toxic than conventional nystatin, unacceptable
Department of Health, Elizabeth Lee Hazen and Rachel infusion-related toxicity unfortunately caused a halt in the
Fuller Brown discovered nystatin, a polyene derived from development of this drug [30–32].
Streptomyces noursei [20–22]. In 1955, Sloane [23] reported
topical nystatin to be particularly effective for treatment of AMPHOTERICIN B
noninvasive moniliasis (candidiasis), a frequent complica- Amphotericin B is a fungicidal polyene antibiotic and, like
tion observed in children enrolled in early chemothera- other members of the polyene class, is effective against
peutic leukemia trials underway during this period [24]. organisms with sterol-containing cell membranes [19].
Underdevelopment:
VT-1161, VT-1129, and VT-1158
Lipid-amphotericin
1995–1997
B formulations
(a)
2006 Posaconazole
2002 Voriconazole
1958 Amphotericin B
1955 Nystatin
1992 Itraconazole
1990 Fluconazole
Underdevelopment:
CD101 and SCY-078
1981 Ketoconazole (c)
2006 Anidulafungin
Late 1960s Clotrimazole, miconazole, and econazole
2005 Micafungin
1959 Chlormidazole
2002 Caspofungin
1944 Benznidazole
Figure 1.1 Historical development of the antifungal agents, including novel antifungals: (a) azoles, (b) polyenes, and
(c) echinocandins (1,3-β-glucan synthase inhibitors).
Antifungals for the treatment of invasive infections 3
Amphotericin B was extracted from Streptomyces nodosus, number of potential pharmacologic mechanisms not associ-
a filamentous bacterium, at the Squibb Institute for Medical ated with shared pathogen–host cell toxicity [19,41].
Research in 1955 and subsequently served as the standard The discovery of the azole antifungal drugs (Figure 1.1)
treatment for many invasive fungal infections [33]. was seminal in the history of antifungal development. Until
Amphotericin B provided activity against invasive the discovery of azoles, amphotericin B was the only avail-
Aspergillus superior to that of previously available antifun- able agent to treat disseminated fungal infections includ-
gal agents [33,34]. Amphotericin B continues to be effective ing invasive aspergillosis—although not without concerns
for the treatment of fluconazole-resistant fungal infec- regarding nephrotoxicity and administration.
tions [19,30]. Like other polyenes, amphotericin B exhibits Azoles inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol, the major ste-
dose-dependent toxicities including renal impairment and rol in the fungal cell membrane, via inhibition of the cyto-
hypokalemia [19,30,34,35]. Renal toxicity associated with chrome P450 enzyme, lanosterol demethylase [41,42]. This
polyene antibiotics is believed to be mediated by the drug inhibition results in disruption of cell membrane integrity
interaction with cholesterol within the mammalian cell with eventual death.
membrane, resulting in pore formation, abnormal electro-
lyte flux, decrease in adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and EARLY AZOLES
eventually a loss of cell viability [19]. In 1944, Woolley [43] described the antifungal activity of
In the early 1980s, several research groups developed a new the first azole, benzimidazole. Descriptions of the antifun-
liposomal amphotericin B formulation. Graybill et al. [36] gal properties of substituted benzimidazole were followed
published the first extensive study investigating the treat- by the discovery of chlormidazole [44–46].
ment of murine cryptococcosis with liposome-associated In the late 1960s, clotrimazole was developed in
amphotericin B. The tissues of Crytococcus-infected mice Germany by Bayer [17]. Miconazole and econazole were
treated with the liposome-associated formulation were developed subsequently by Janssen Pharmaceutica, Antwerp,
demonstrated to have lower tissue fungal burden than the Belgium [46]. The early imidazoles, such as clotrimazole,
tissues of similarly-infected mice treated with conventional miconazole, and tioconazole, showed good topical antifun-
amphotericin B. Liposome-associated amphotericin B dem- gal activity, but were of limited value for treating systemic
onstrated increased efficacy attributed to the ability to treat infections.
with higher doses (due to its lesser toxicity) than was possi-
ble with amphotericin B deoxycholate (conventional ampho- SECOND GENERATION AZOLES
tericin B formulation) [36,37]. In 1981, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved
In the past decades, three novel liposomal formula- the systemic use of ketoconazole, an imidazole derivative
tions of amphotericin B have been approved for use in the synthesized and developed by Janssen Pharmaceutica,
United States: amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD; Antwerp, Belgium [45]. Ketoconazole was also avail-
AmphocilOR or AmphotecOR), amphotericin B lipid complex able commercially as an anti-dandruff shampoo, branded
(ABLC; AbelcetOR), and small unilamellar vesicle liposomal (NizoralOR) by the same company. For almost a decade,
formulation (L-AmB; AmbisomeOR). ketoconazole was regarded as the standard oral agent for
The development of lipid-based amphotericin B formu- treatment of fungal infections, including chronic muco-
lations afforded significant advantages in treatment of sys- cutaneous candidiasis [47]. Mendes et al. [48] considered
temic fungal infections, including decreased toxicity and azole derivatives as the drugs of choice for the treatment
improved tolerance [38–40]. of eumycetomas. The oral formulation of ketoconazole is
Despite the introduction of newer antifungal agents for now regarded as a treatment option only when all others fail
the treatment of systemic mycoses, amphotericin B remains [49]. There are serious hepatic issues that can develop with
the standard treatment for many severe, invasive fungal its use. In fact, it was taken off the market across Europe
infections. However, because of toxicities associated with and in Australia in 2013 [50]. Its topical formulation is still
its intravenous use, along with the expanded availability of in use because it does not share the same toxicity concerns
safer treatment options, it is frequently reserved for patients as its oral counterpart.
who have severe, life-threatening invasive fungal infections In 1978, Pfizer developed fluconazole, a drug suitable
or who are unable to tolerate alternative antifungal agents. for oral and intravenous treatment of superficial and sys-
temic fungal infections [47,48,51]. Fluconazole was shown
Azole antifungals to have a good safety profile and was approved for the treat-
ment of oropharyngeal, esophageal, vaginal, peritoneal, and
Progress in the development of new antifungal agents genito-urinary candidal infections, disseminated candi-
lagged behind that of antibacterial antibiotics. The delay can diasis, and cryptococcal meningitis. Unlike ketoconazole,
be explained by two factors: (i) before the HIV/AIDS period, fluconazole is highly water soluble and can be administered
the occurrence of fungal infections was believed to be too parenterally. Recently, the utility of fluconazole has been
low to warrant aggressive research by the pharmaceutical limited by the emergence of resistant organisms, such as
industry; and (ii) the apparent lack of a highly selective fun- C. krusei and C. glabrata, against which fluconazole has
gal target not present in other mammalian cells limited the poor activity [52,53].
4 History of antifungals
In 1992, the FDA approved itraconazole, a broad spec- vehicle, this antifungal is associated with lower toxicity in
trum triazole antifungal agent developed by Janssen humans.
Pharmaceutica (SporanoxOR). Itraconazole was shown to be Azoles underdevelopment that show great promise
less toxic than previous azoles, with a spectrum of activ- are several compounds by Viamet Pharmaceuticals [70].
ity broader than that of ketoconazole [52,53]. Consequently, VT-1161, VT-1129, and VT-1598 are all azoles that have
itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole as the treatment of been molecularly altered to substantially reduce the inter-
choice for invasive aspergillosis [52]. actions these azoles have with cytochrome P450 and to
Although the discovery of fluconazole and itraconazole increase their half-lives [70,71]. Since azoles effects on cyto-
represented a major advancement in the management of chrome P450 is the main driving force behind drug-drug
systemic fungal infections, these triazole antifungal agents interactions of azoles, Viamet’s compounds have markedly
have some important limitations [54,55]. Fluconazole less drug-drug complications leading to their ability to be
activity has a narrow spectrum, targeting mainly yeast used in more circumstances than previously allowed [72].
(Cryptococcus neoformans, C. albicans) and dimorphic VT-1161 was recently evaluated in phase II clinical tri-
fungi, with no activity against molds [56,57]. In compari- als for both vaginal candidiasis and onychomycosis, while
son, itraconazole has a broader spectrum that includes VT-1129 and VT-1598 are still undergoing in vitro and in
activity against Aspergillus species and some yeast strains vivo testing [73].
that are intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, such as C. krusei
and C. glabrata [56,57]. Echinocandin antifungals
THIRD GENERATION AZOLES The advent of echinocandins (Figure 1.1), was heralded
Voriconazole, a derivative of fluconazole, is a synthetic by the development and approval of caspofungin acetate
third-generation triazole developed in the late 1980s by (Cancidas; Merck & Co., Inc.) for the treatment of candi-
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Antwerp, Belgium [58,59] and diasis in 2002 [66]. The echinocandins are a group of large,
approved by the FDA in May 2002. Voriconazole is more semisynthetic, cyclic lipopeptides discovered in the 1970s.
active than fluconazole and itraconazole against Candida Large molecular weight may explain their poor absorption
species [60]. The activity of voriconazole against filamen- through the digestive tract. Therefore, all three commer-
tous fungi, particularly Aspergillus, was found to be supe- cially available echinocandin compounds—caspofungin
rior to that of amphotericin B [57,58]. Voriconazole is now acetate, micafungin, and anidulafungin—are used only
considered the gold standard for the treatment of aspergil- intravenously [74,75]. Echinocandins inhibit synthesis of
losis [61–63]. 1,3-ß-D-glucan, an essential component of the fungal cell
Posaconazole, a hydroxylated analogue of itraconazole, wall [76]. The synthesis of caspofungin acetate based on
was developed by the Schering-Plough Research Institute pneumocandin B0 requires chemical modification at two
and approved for use in 2006 [64]. Posaconazole is effec- sites of the peptide core, reduction of a primary amide to
tive against opportunistic and endemic fungi, such as an amine, and condensation of the hemiaminal moiety with
Aspergillus spp., Zygomycetes, and Candida species [64,65]. ethylenediamine [76].
Posaconazole has been shown to be superior to ampho- Caspofungin acetate (CancidasOR) is fungicidal against
tericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole against most com- yeasts and dimorphic fungi such as C. albicans, includ-
mon fungal pathogens in in vitro and animal studies [66]. ing triazole-resistant isolates, and fungistatic against
It is approved for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections Aspergillus species [77]. Aspergillus fumigatus is unable to
(aspergillosis and candidiasis) in immunocompromised sustain polarized growth in the presence of multiple doses
patients and for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis. of caspofungin, leading to significant fungal cell death in
Recently, a delayed-release formula was created that allows tissues [74,78]. Isham and Ghannoum [79] concluded that
patients to be dosed once to twice daily in the hospital or at voriconazole demonstrated greater in vitro inhibitory activ-
home [67]. ity than caspofungin against the non-albicans isolates.
Isavuconazole (Basilea Pharmaceutica, Antwerp, Micafungin (MycamineOR, Astellas Pharma, Japan)
Belgium) and marketed by Astellas Pharma was approved and anidulafungin (EraxisOR, Pfizer, Inc., New York) were
by the FDA in 2015 for the treatment of invasive asper- approved for use in 2006. Micafungin was first isolated from
gillosis and invasive mucormycosis in adults [68]. It is the culture broth of Coleophoma empedri [80]. It is a novel
a broad-spectrum antifungal affective against Candida water-soluble lipopeptide derived by semisynthetic modifi-
species, Aspergillus, some Zygomycetes, C. neoformans, cation of FR901379, a naturally occurring cyclic hexapep-
Cryptococcus, and several other molds, including Mucorales tide with a fatty acryl side chain and is similar in structure
[69]. It has been shown to be as effective as voriconazole and to echinocandins and pneumocandins [80,81]. Micafungin
is highly water soluble, unlike voriconazole and posacon- is useful in the treatment of infections due to azole-resistant
azole. This allows for it to be administered without a cyclo- Candida [82].
dextrin vehicle. Cyclodextrin vehicles are associated with Anidulafungin is a derivative of a naturally occurring
nephrotoxicity and, since isavuconazole and its inactive, candin, echinocandin B, produced by Aspergillus nidulans
prodrug form isacuconazonium sulfate do not require this or A. rugulosis [83]. Cilofungin was the first semisynthetic
Future agents 5
derivative of echinocandin B to be evaluated in clinical tri- Candida, Trichophyton, Microsporum, and Malassezia spe-
als; however, the trials were discontinued due to associated cies and most often involve the skin, nails, buccal or vaginal
nephrotoxicity. Further structure modification of cilofun- mucosa, or eyes [98]. Historically, compounds such as gen-
gin led to the synthesis of anidulafungin [83]. tian violet and Balsam of Peru were used for topical antifun-
The newest echinocandin underdevelopment is CD101 gal therapy. However, in the past decades, fungistatic azole
(Cidara Therapeutics), which is more stable and, thus, has drugs with imidazole- and triazole-containing compounds
a longer half-life than the previous echinocandins [84]. (e.g., miconazole and itraconazole, respectively) have been
This stability also leads to the ability for CD101 to be used the mainstay of topical antifungal therapy [100,101]. The
topically [85]. This allows for its use in skin and vaginal advent of fungicidal allylamines (e.g., terbinafine) has
infections as well as systemic infections. Like the other echi- improved treatment outcomes, as cure rates are higher
nocandins, there is no oral formulation. It is in clinical trials with fungicidal drugs. Other new agents such as topical
for vaginal and invasive candidiasis [85,86]. echinocandins (caspofungin), ciclopirox, efinaconazole,
and tavaborole offer additional options for the treatment of
New antifungals underdevelopment superficial fungal infections [102–104].
Antifungal proteins interfere with the physiological proper- 16. Gentles JC. Experimental ringworm in guinea
ties of fungus leading to fungal cell death [122–125]. pigs: Oral treatment with griseofulvin. Nature
The history of antifungal agents continues to evolve, and 1958;182(4633):476–477.
no doubt will produce novel agents that, it is hoped, will 17. Whiffen AJ, Bohonos N, Emerson RL. The produc-
target the organism as well as the host immunity. tion of an antifungal antibiotic by streptomyces
griseus. J Bacteriol 1946;52(5):610–611.
REFERENCES 18. Steffen C, Dupree MT. The introduction of griseoful-
vin. Skin Med 2004;3(2):105–106.
1. Li L, Redding S, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. Candida 19. Ghannoum MA, Rice LB. Antifungal agents: Mode
glabrata, an emerging oral opportunistic pathogen. of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation
J Dent Res 2007;86(3):204–215. of these mechanisms with bacteria resistance. Clin
2. Bille J, Marchetti O, Calandra T. Changing face of Microbiol Rev 1999;12(4):501–517.
health-care associated fungal infections. Curr Opin 20. Fromtling RA. Overview of medically important
Infect Dis 2005;8:314–319. antifungal azole derivatives. Clin Microbiol Rev
3. Castagnola E, Cesaro S, Giacchino M, et al. Fungal infec- 1988;1:187–219.
tions in children with cancer: A prospective, multicenter 21. Brown R, Hazen EL. Present knowledge of nystatin,
surveillance study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:634–639. an antifungal antibiotic. Trans N Y Acad Sci
4. Bethge WA, Schmalzing M, Stuhler G, et al. 1957;19(5):447–456.
Mucormycoses in patients with hematologic 22. Brown R, Hazen EL. Nystatin. Ann NY Acad Sci
malignancies: An emerging fungal infection. 1960;89:258–266.
Haematologica 2005;90:ECR22. 23. Sloane MB. A new antifungal antibiotic, mycostatin
5. Richardson MD, Warnock DW (Eds.). Fungal (nystatin), for the treatment of moniliasis: A prelimi-
Infection: Diagnosis and Management, 3rd ed. nary report. J Invest Dermatol 1955;24(6):569–571.
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1993. 24. Mehta RT, Hopfer RL, Gunner LA, et al. Formulation,
6. Frankenberg BE, Litvineko AN. Treatment of cervico- toxicity, and antifungal activity in vitro of liposome-
facial actinomycosis with massive doses of potassium encapsulated nystatin as therapeutic agent for
iodide. Stomatologiia (Mosk) 1952;6(4):26–30. systemic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
7. Dostrovsky A, Rauitschek F, Paz ZE, et al. The 1987;31:1897–1900.
treatment of tinea capitis with oral potassium 25. Arikan S, Rex JH. Lipid-based antifungal agents:
iodide. J Invest Dermatol 1960;34:347–349. Current status. Curr Pharm Des 2001;7:395–417.
8. Urabe H, Nagashima T. Mechanism of antifun- 26. Ng AW, Wasan KM, Lopez-Berestein G. Development
gal action of potassium iodide on sporotrichosis. of liposomal polyene antibiotics: An historical per-
Dermatol Int 1969;8:36–39. spective. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2003;6(1):67–83.
9. Shore RE, Moseson M, Xue X, et al. Skin cancer 27. Silva L, Coutinho A, Fedorov A, et al. Nystatin-
after X-ray treatment for scalp ringworm. Radiat Res induced lipid vesicles permeabilization is strongly
2002;157:410–418. dependent on sterol structure. Bioch Biophys Acta
10. Mayer RL, Eisman PC, Geftic S, et al. Sulfonamides 2006;1758(4):452–459.
and experimental histoplasmosis. Antibiot 28. Gupta AK, Sauder DN, Shear NH. Antifungal
Chemother 1956;6:215–225. agents: An overview. Part II. J Am Acad Dermatol
11. Mahgoub ES. Treatment of actinomycetoma with 1994;30:677–698.
sulphamethoxazole plus trimethoprim. Am J Trop 29. Oakley KL, Moore CB, Denning DW. Comparison
Med Hyg 1972;21(3):332–335. of in vitro activity of liposomal nystatin against
12. Lamb JH. Combined therapy in histoplasmosis aspergillus species with those of nystatin, ampho-
and coccidioidomycosis; methyltestosterone and tericin B (AB) deoxycholate, AB colloidal dis-
meth-dia-mer-sulfonamides. AMA Arch Derm persion, liposomal AB, AB lipid complex, and
Syphilol 1954;70:695–712. itraconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
13. Webster BH. Pulmonary nocardiosis; a review with a 1999;43(5):1264–1266.
report of seven cases. Am Rev Tuber Pulmonary Dis 30. Kleiberg M. What is the current and future status of
1956;73:485–500. conventional amphotericin B? Int J Antimic Agents
14. Weed LA, Andersen HA, Good CA, et al. 2006;27(Suppl. 1):12–16.
Nocardiosis; clinical, bacteriologic and pathological 31. Boswell GW, Buell D, Bekersky I. AmBiosome (lipo-
aspects. New Engl J Med 1955;253:1137–1143. somal amphotericin B): A comparative review. J Clin
15. Oxford AE, Raistrick H, Simonart P. Studies in Pharmacol 1998;38:583–592.
the biochemistry of micro-organisms: Griseoful- 32. Larson JL, Wallace TL, Tyl RW, et al. The reproduc-
vin, C(17)H(17)O(6)Cl, a metabolic product of tive and developmental toxicity of the antifungal
penicillium griseo-fulvum dierckx. Biochem J drug NyotranOR (liposomal nystatin) in rats and rab-
1939;33(2):240–248. bits. Toxicol Sci 2000;53:421–429.
References 7
33. Peer ET. Case of aspergillosis treated with ampho- 53. Sheehan DJ, Hitchcock CA, Sibley CM. Current and
tericin B. Dis Chest 1960;38:222–230. emerging azole antifungal agent. Clin Microbiol Rev
34. Procknow JJ. Treatment of opportunistic fungus 1999;12:40–79.
infections. Lab Invest 1962;11:1217–1230. 54. Coleman JM, Hogg GG, Rosenfeld JV, et al. Invasive
35. Plihal V, Jedlickova Z, Viklicky J, et al. Multiple central nervous system aspergillosis: Cure with
bilateral pulmonary aspergillomata. Thorax liposomal amphotericin B, itraconazole, and radical
1964;19:104–111. surgery—Case report and review of the literature.
36. Graybill JR, Craven PC, Taylor RL, et al. Treatment Neurosurgery 1995;36(4):858–863.
of murine cryptococcosis with liposome-associated 55. United States Food and Drug Administration.
amphotericin B. J Infect Dis 1982;145(5):748–752. Hepatotoxicity labelling for sporanox (itraconazole)
37. Graybill JR. Lipid formulations for amphotericin B: oral solution, 2002. [Online.] http://www.fda.gov/
Does the emperor need new clothes? Ann Int Med cder/foi/label/2002/20657s8lbl.pdf.
1996;124(10):921–923. 56. Nolte FS, Parkinson T, Falconer DJ, et al. Isolation
38. Graybill JR. The future of antifungal therapy. Clin and characterization of fluconazole- and ampho-
Infect Dis 1996;22(Suppl. 2):S166–S178. tericin B-resistant Candida albicans from blood
39. Boswell GW, Buell D, Bekersky I. AmBisome (lipo- of two patients with leukemia. Antimicrob Agents
somal amphotericin B): A comparative review. J Clin Chemother 1997;41(1):196–199.
Pharmacol 1998;38:583–592. 57. Dismukes WE. Antifungal therapy: Lessons
40. Bekersky I, Fielding RM, Dressler DE, et al. learned over the past 27 years. Clin Infect Dis
Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of 2006;42:1289–1296.
liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and ampho- 58. Marriott MS, Richardson K. The discovery and
tericin B deoxycholate in humans. Antimicrob Agents mode of action of fluconazole. In: Formtling RA
Chemother 2002;46(3):828–833. (Ed.). Fluconazole, a Significant Advance in the
41. Ghannoum MA. Future of antimycotic therapy. Management of Human Fungal Disease. Barcelona,
Dermatol Ther 1997;3:104–111. Spain: J. R. Prous Science Publishers, 1987:81–92.
42. Maertens JA. History of the development of azole 59. Pappas PG, Rex JH, Sobel JD, et al. Guidelines
derivatives. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004;10(suppl. for treatment of candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis
1):1–10. 2004;38:161–189.
43. Woolley DW. Some biological effects produced by 60. Lewis RE, Wiederhold NP, Klepser ME. In vitro
benzimidazole and their reversal by purines. J Biol pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole,
Chem 1944;152:225–232. and voriconazole against aspergillus, fusarium, and
44. Jerchel D, Fischer H, Fracht M. Zur darstel- scedosporium spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
lung der benzimidazole. Liebigs Ann Chem 2005;49(3):945–951.
1952;575:162–173. 61. Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, et al. Treatment
45. Holt RJ. Topical pharmacology of imidazole antifun- of aspergillosis: Clinical practice guidelines of the
gals. J Cutan Pathol 1976;3(1):45–59. infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis
46. Herrling S, Sous H, Kruppe W, et al. Experimental 2008;46:327–360.
studies on a new combination effective against 62. Consigny S, Dhedin N, Datry A. Successful voricon-
fungi. Arzneimittelforschung 1959;9:489–494. azole treatment of disseminated Fusarium infection
47. Hume AL, Kerkering TM. Ketoconazole. Drug Intell in an immunocompromised patient. Clin Infect Dis
Clin Pharm 1983;17(3):169–174. 2003;37:311–313.
48. Mendes PR, Negroni R, Bonifaz A, et al. New 63. Marco F, Pfaller MA, Messer S, et al. In vitro activi-
aspects of some endemic mycoses. Med Mycol ties of voriconazole (UK-109,496) and four other
2000;38(Suppl. 1):237–241. antifungal agents against 394 clinical isolates
49. United States Food and Drug Administration. FDA of Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
drug safety communication: FDA limits usage of 1998;42(1):161–163.
Nizoral (ketoconazole) oral tablets due to potentially 64. Farowski F, Vehreschild JJ, Cornely OA.
fatal liver injury and risk of drug interactions and Posaconazole: A next-generation triazole antifungal.
adrenal gland problems, 2013. [Online.] https://www. Future Microbiol 2007;2:231–243.
fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm362415.htm. 65. Chiou CC, Groll AH, Walsh TJ. New drugs and novel
50. Gupta AK, Lyons DCA. The rise and fall of oral keto- targets for treatment of invasive fungal infections in
conazole. J Cutan Med Surg 2015;19(4):352–357. patients with cancer. Oncologist 2000;5(2):120–135.
51. Richardson K. Taking a drug to market. Sci Publ 66. Sun QN, Fothergill AW, McCarthy DI, et al. In vitro
Affairs 1990;5(3):11–14. activities of posaconazole, itraconazole, voricona-
52. Richardson K, Cooper K, Marriott MS, et al. zole, amphotericin B, and fluconazole against 37
Discovery of fluconazole, a novel antifungal agent. clinical isolates of zygomycetes. Antimicrob Agents
Rev Infect Dis 1990;12(Suppl. 3):S267–S271. Chemother 2002;46(5):1581–1582.
8 History of antifungals
67. United States Food and Drug Administration. Center for 82. Messer A, Diekema DJ, Boyken L, et al. Activities of
Drug Evaluation and Research: Application Number: micafungin against 315 invasive clinical isolates of
205596Orig1s000 Summary review, 2014. [Online.] fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/ 2006;44:324–326.
nda/2014/205596Orig1s000SumR.pdf. 83. Ghannoum M, D’Angelo M. Anidulafungin, a potent
68. Mullard A. FDA approvals for the first 6 months of antifungal that target Candida and Aspergillus.
2015. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2015;14:517. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2005;13(4):1–14.
69. Pettit NN, Carver PL. Isavuconazole: A new option 84. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, et al. Activity
for the management of invasive fungal infections. of a long-acting echinocandin (CD101) and seven
Ann Pharmacother 2015;49(7):825–842. comparator antifungal agents tested against a
70. Moriyama B, Gordon LA, McCarthy M, et al. global collection of contemporary invasive fungal
Emerging drugs and vaccines for candidemia. isolates in the SENTRY 2014 antifungal surveil-
Mycoses 2014;57(12):718–733. lance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
71. Schell WA, Jones AM, Garvey EP, et al. Fungal 2017;61(3):e02045–16.
CYP51 inhibitors VT-1161 and VT-1129 exhibit 85. ClinicalTrials.gov. RADIANT: CD101 vs. Standard of
strong in vitro activity against Candida glabrata and care in subjects with acute vaginal yeast infections,
C. krusei isolates clinically resistant to azole and 2016. [Online.] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
echinocandin antifungal compounds. Antimicrob NCT02733432.
Agents Chemother 2017;61(3):e01817–16. 86. ClinicalTrials.gov. CD101 Compared to caspofun-
72. Warrilow AG, Parker JE, Price CL, et al. The investi- gin followed by oral step down in subjects with
gational drug VT-1129 is a highly potent inhibitor of candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis (STRIVE),
cryptococcus species CYP51 but only weakly inhibits 2016. [Online.] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
the human enzyme. Antimicrob Agents Chemother NCT02734862.
2016;60(8):4530–4538. 87. ClinicalTrials.gov. Open-label study to evaluate
73. Chang Y, Yu S, Heitman J, et al. New facets of anti- efficacy and safety of SCY-078 in patients with
fungal therapy. Virulence 2017;8(2):222–236. refractory or intolerant fungal diseases (FURI),
74. Morris MI, Villmann M. Echinocandins in the man- 2017. [Online.] https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
agement of invasive fungal infections, part 2. Am NCT03059992.
J of Health Syst Pharm 2006;63(19):1813–1820. 88. Jimenez-Ortigosa C, Perez WB, Angulo D, et al. De
75. Kim R, Khachikian D, Reboli AC. A comparative novo acquisition of resistance to SCY-078 in Candida
evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of glabrata involves FKS mutations that both overlap
the echinocandins. Expert Opin Pharmacother and are distinct from those conferring echino-
2007;8(10):1479–1492. candin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
76. Denning DW. Echinocandins: A new class of antifun- 2017;61(9):e00833-17.
gal. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49:899–891. 89. Watanabe N, Miyazaki M, Horii T, et al. E1210,
77. Leonard WR Jr, Belyk KM, Conlon DA, et al. a new broad-spectrum antifungal, suppresses
Synthesis of the antifungal beta-1,3-glucan Candida albicans hyphal growth through
synthase inhibitor CANCIDAS (caspofungin inhibition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol
acetate) from pneumocandin B0. J Org Chem biosynthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2007;72(7):2335–2343. 2012;56(2):960–971.
78. Minassian B, Huczko E, Washo T, et al. In vitro 90. Hata K, Horii T, Miyazaki M, et al. Efficacy
activity of ravuconazole against zygomycetes, sce- of oral E1210, a new broad-spectrum anti-
dosporium and fusarium isolates. Clin Micro Infect fungal with a novel mechanism of action, in
Dis 2003;9:1250–1252. murine models of Candidiasis, Aspergillosis,
79. Isham N, Ghannoum MA. Determination of MICs of and fusariosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
aminocandin for Candida spp. and filamentous fungi. 2011;55(10):4543–4551.
J Clin Microbiol 2006;44(12):4342–4344. 91. Wiederhold NP, Najvar LK, Fothergill AW, et al. The
80. Ernst EJ, Roling EE, Petzold CR, et al. In vitro investigational agent E1210 is effective in treat-
activity of micafungin (FK-463) against Candida ment of experimental invasive Candidiasis caused
spp.: Microdilution, time-kill, and postantifungal- by resistant Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents
effect studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Chemother 2015;59(1):690–692.
2002;46(12):3846–3853. 92. Castanheira M, Duncanson FP, Diekema DJ, et al.
81. van Burik JH, Ratanatharathorn V, Stepan DE, et al. Activities of E1210 and comparator agents tested
Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis by CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods
against invasive fungal infections during neutrope- against Fusarium and Scedosporium species identi-
nia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell fied using molecular methods. Antimicrob Agents
transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1407–1416. Chemother 2012;56(1):352–357.
References 9
93. Pfaller MA, Duncanson F, Messer SA, et al. In 106. Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Serum therapy revisted:
vitro activity of a novel broad-spectrum anti- Animal models of infection and development
fungal, E1210, tested against Aspergillus spp. of passive antibody therapy. Antimicrob Agents
determined by CLSI and EUCAST broth microdi- Chemother 1994;38:1695–1702.
lution methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 107. Heitman J. Cell biology: A fungal Achilles’ heel.
2011;55(11):5155–5158. Science 2005;309:2175–2176.
94. Miyazaki M, Horii T, Hata K, et al. In vitro activity of 108. Scorzoni L, de Paula e Silva ACA, Marcos CM, et al.
E1210, a novel antifungal, against clinically important Antifungal therapy: New advances in the under-
yeasts and molds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother standing and treatment of mycosis. Front Microbiol
2011;55(10):4652–4658. 2017;8:36.
95. Oliver JD, Sibley GEM, Beckmann N, et al. F901318 109. Casadevall A. The third age of antimicrobial therapy.
represents a novel class of antifungal drug that Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1414–1416.
inhibits dihydroorotate dehydrogenase. PNAS 110. Franco R, Pacheco R, Lluis C, et al. The emergence
2016;113(45):12809–12814. of neurotransmitters as immune modulators. Trends
96. Buil JB, Rijs AJM, Meis JF, et al. In vitro activity of Immun 2007;28(9):400–407.
the novel antifungal compound F901318 against 111. Burnie JP, Carter TL, Hodgetts SJ, et al. Fungal
difficult-to-treat Aspergillus isolates. J Antimicrob heat shock proteins in human disease. FEMS Rev
Chemther 2017;72(9):2548–2552. 2006;30(1):53–88.
97. Wiederhold NP, Law D, Birch M. Dihydroorotate 112. Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Yeaman MR, et al. The
dehydrogenase inhibitor F901318 has potent in antifungal vaccine derived from the recombinant
vitro activity against Scedosporium species and N terminus of Als3p protects mice against the
Lomentospora prolificans. J Antimicrob Chemther bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun
2017;72:1977–1980. 2008;76:4574–4580.
98. Ghannoum MA, Hajjeh RA, Scher R, et al. A large- 113. Spellberg BJ, Ibrahim AS, Avanesian V, et al. Efficacy
scale North American study of fungal isolates from of the anti-Candida rAls3p-N or rAls1p-N vaccines
nails: The frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distri- against disseminated and mucosal candidiasis.
bution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am J Infect Dis 2006;194:256–260.
Acad Dermatol 2000;43(4):641–648. 114. Torosantucci A, Bromuro C, Chiani P, et al. A novel
99. Thomas J, Jacobson GA, Narkowicz CK, et al. glycol-congate vaccine against fungal pathogens.
Toenail onychomycosis: An important global disease J Exp Med 2005;202(5):597–606.
burden. J Clin Pharm Ther 2010;35(5):497–519. 115. Torosantucci A, Chiani P, Bromuro C, et al.
100. Katoh T. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment Protection by anti-beta-glucan antibodies is associ-
of mucocutaneous candidiasis. Jpn J Med Mycol ated with restricted beta-1,3 glucan binding specific-
2009;50(4):207–212. ity and inhibition of fungal growth and adherence.
101. Iorizzo M, Piraccini BM, Rech G, et al. Treatment of PLoS One 2009;4(4):e5392.
onychomycosis with oral antifungal agents. Expert 116. Saito K, Dai Y, Ohtsuka K. Enhanced expression of
Opin Drug Deliv 2005;2(3):435–440. heat shock proteins in gradually dying cells and their
102. Bao YQ, Wan Z, Li RY. In vitro antifungal activity release from necrotically dead cells. Exp Cell Res
of micafungin and caspofungin against derma- 2005;310:229–236.
tophytes isolated from China. Mycopathologia 117. Matthews R, Burnie J. Antibodies against Candida:
2013;175(1–2):141–145. Potential therapeutics? Trends Microbiol
103. Tauber A, Muller-Goymann CC. Comparison of 1996;4:354–358.
the antifungal efficacy of terbinafine hydrochlo- 118. Casadevall A. Antibody immunity and invasive fungal
ride and ciclopirox olamine containing formula- infections. Infect Immun 1995;63:4211–4218.
tions against the dermatophyte Trichophyton 119. Pachl J, Svoboda P, Jacobs F. A randomized, blinded,
rubrum in an infected nail plate model. Mol Pharm multicenter trial of lipid-associated amphotericin
2014;11(7):1991–1996. B alone versus in combination with an antibody-
104. Saunders J, Maki K, Koski R, et al. Tavaborale, efin- based inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 in
azconazole, and luliconazole: Three new antimycotic patients with invasive candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis
agents for the treatment of dermatophytic fungi. 2006;42(10):1404–1413.
J Pharm Pract 2016;30:621–630. 120. Bugli F, Cacai M, Martini C, et al. Human monoclonal
105. Buchwald UK, Pirofski L. Immune therapy for antibody-based therapy in the treatment of invasive
infectious diseases at the dawn of the 21st candidiasis. Clin Dev Immunol 2013;2013:403121.
century: The past, present and future role of 121. Matthews RC, Rigg G, Hodgetts S. Preclinical assess-
antibody therapy, therapeutic vaccination and ment of the efficacy of mycograb, a human recom-
biological response modifiers. Curr Pharm Des binant antibody against fungal Hsp90. Antimicrob
2003;9:945–968. Agents Chemother 2003;47(7):2208–2216.
10 History of antifungals
122. Delgado J, Owens RA, Doyle S, et al. Impact of the 124. Ajesh K, Sreejith K. A novel antifungal protein
antifungal protein PgAFP from Penicillium chrysoge- with lysozyme-like activity from seeds of
num on the protein profile in Aspergillus flavus. Appl Clitoria ternatea. Appl Biochem Biotechnol
Microbiol Biotechnol 2015;99(20):8701–8715. 2014;173(3):682–693.
123. Wen C, Guo W, Chen X. Purification and identifi- 125. Yasmin N, Saleem M. Biochemical characteriza-
cation of a novel antifungal protein secreted by tion of fruit-specific pathogenesis-related anti-
Penicillium citrinum from the Southwest Indian fungal protein from Basrai banana. Microbiol Res
Ocean. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014;24(10):1337–45. 2014;169(5–6):369–377.
2
Epidemiology of fungal infections:
What, where, and when
Introduction 11 Mucormycosis 20
Aspergillosis 12 Endemic mycoses 21
Non-Aspergillus hyalohyphomycetes 14 Blastomyces 21
Acremonium 14 Coccidioides 22
Fusarium 14 Histoplasma 22
Paecilomyces 16 Paracoccidioides 23
Scedosporium 16 Penicillium marneffei 23
Scopulariopsis 17 Emmonsia 24
Phaeohyphomycoses 18 Sporothrix 24
Alternaria 18 Yeasts 24
Bipolaris 18 Candida 24
Cladophialophora 19 Cryptococcus 26
Curvularia 19 Malassezia 27
Verruconis/Ochroconis 19 Trichosporon 27
Exophiala (Wangiella) dermatitidis and Exophiala Rhodotorula 28
jeanselmei 19 Saccharomyces 28
Exserohilum 20 Geotrichum 28
Fonsecaea 20 Pneumocystis 28
Phialophora 20 References 29
Ramichloridium 20
11
12 Epidemiology of fungal infections: What, where, and when
these entities, indicate that over the past several decades, can progress to chronic necrotizing aspergillosis or present
there has been an increasing incidence of IFIs due to yeasts, with tracheobronchitis. In immunocompromised hosts,
such as Candida spp. and Cryptococcus spp., and molds, invasive disease may develop as invasive pulmonary asper-
such as Aspergillus spp. and fungi of the order Mucorales [2]. gillosis, invasive sinusitis, or dissemination to extrapulmo-
Epidemiologic trends also suggest that other filamentous nary sites [4,16].
hyphomycetes, such as Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp., ABPA arises from a hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus
and Paecilomyces spp., are becoming more common [3]. antigens. Patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis may
Emergence of these rare fungal pathogens, which often develop ABPA late in the course of their disease [17–19].
exhibit multiresistance to antifungals, is an increasing con- In patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), one study has shown
cern. This chapter reviews the epidemiology of the most lung function to deteriorate over time in those CF patients
common fungal infections including the typical clinical with ABPA compared with CF controls [20]. Similarly,
manifestations associated with each fungal pathogen. patients with bronchiectasis and evidence of ABPA have
been shown to have worse lung function when compared to
ASPERGILLOSIS those with bronchiectasis without ABPA [21]. The diagno-
sis of ABPA is suspected on clinical findings and confirmed
Aspergillus is a ubiquitous hyalohyphomycete (mold with by radiologic and serologic results. Impaired mucous clear-
nonpigmented, regularly septate hyphae) found in soil, dust, ance, productive cough with mucous plugs or brown specks,
compost, rotted plants, and other organic debris including mucoid impaction, and episodic bronchial obstruction are
foods and spices [4,5]. About 339 species are known [6] characteristics of ABPA. Those with chronic disease may
and divided into 20 sections, though only a few have been present with bronchiectasis and fibrosis. Imaging with com-
reported as pathogenic to humans. The more commonly puted tomography (CT) may show pulmonary infiltrates or
reported human pathogens include Aspergillus of the sec- bronchiectasis, and laboratory findings, such as growth of
tion Fumigati (Aspergillus fumigatus), Flavi (A. flavus), Nigri Aspergillus in culture or immunologic response with skin
(A. niger), and Terrei (A. terreus). Of these, A. fumigatus reactivity to Aspergillus antigens, support the diagnosis.
is the most common species to cause invasive disease, and Allergic fungal sinusitis tends to arise in patients with
A. flavus is the second most commonly reported. Though atopy, history of allergic rhinitis/sinusitis, nasal polyps, and
A. terreus is less common, it is resistant to amphoteri- sometimes, asthma [4,22]. Direct microscopy often reveals
cin B and has historically been associated with an excep- thick green mucus or mucopurulent secretions, crusting,
tionally high mortality [7–10]. Aspergillus of section Usti or the presence of polyps. Histologic examination of tissue
(e.g., A. calidoustus) with intrinsic pan-azole resistance biopsy demonstrates thick allergic mucin, hyaline, septate
has emerged as a new opportunistic pathogen in patients hyphae without invasion of tissue, and a chronic inflamma-
receiving azole prophylaxis [11,12]. Other Aspergillus spe- tory response. Growth in culture of the offending mold and
cies such as A. versicolor and A. nidulans are occasionnally high levels of IgE aid in the diagnosis of this entity.
reported [4]. Moreover, some species belonging to the sec- Aspergilloma, or fungus ball, is the most common
tion Fumigati (A. lentulus, A. udagawae, N. pseudofischeri), form of pulmonary involvement due to Aspergillus [4,16].
Flavi (A. alliaceus), or Nigri (A. tubingensis) are increasingly It usually develops in a preformed pulmonary cavity (e.g.,
recognized and may be misidentified in clinical practice. a consequence of prior tuberculosis or bronchiectasis) or
These cryptic species represent 3%–10% of all Aspergillus in the paranasal sinuses and consists of masses of mycelia,
clinical isolates and some, such as A. lentulus or A. udaga- inflammatory cells, debris, and mucus [23]. The aspergil-
wae, may also exhibit intrinsic resistance to triazoles and loma can remain asymptomatic for a prolonged period of
other antifungal drug classes [13–15]. time, though some patients with pulmonary aspergilloma
Aspergillus grows best at 37°C, forming hyaline hyphae may experience hemoptysis, ranging from mild to severe,
with asexual reproduction by conidia that give each species secondary to bleeding from bronchial blood vessels. A fun-
a distinctive colony color. Conidia are easily aerosolized gus ball in the sinus cavity can likewise remain asymptom-
and, when small airborne conidia (2–3 μm for A. fumigatus) atic, evolve to cause allergic-type presentation, or invade
are inhaled, they can settle deep in the lungs where coloni- the contiguous tissue. The latter may occur in patients who
zation and a variety of clinical syndromes may develop. The are immunosuppressed with hematologic malignancy, dia-
type of host plays a role in the clinical spectrum of disease, betes, chronic steroid use, SOT, and AIDS [24]. Invasion
as the host’s immune response and the ability of Aspergillus of tissue and bone may progress to invasion of adjacent
to invade and destroy tissue determine the clinical presen- structures, such as the orbit or the brain. The clinical pre-
tation. In patients with asthma, the inflammatory condition sentation is variable and requires a high index of suspicion,
of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) may along with imaging, tissue histology, and culture to estab-
develop. Allergic sinusitis is also a feature of Aspergillus that lish the diagnosis.
can set up a fungus ball or aspergilloma in lungs with pre- Endobronchial fungal infections are being increas-
formed cavities. Those with underlying chronic lung disease ingly described with the use of surveillance flexible
Aspergillosis 13
bronchoscopy [25]. Presentation can range from mild Patients who are immunocompromised can have dis-
mucosal inflammation to central airway obstruction with semination of Aspergillus to the central nervous system
invasive disease. In lung transplant recipients, ulcerative (CNS) [28,36,37]. At-risk immunocompromised individuals
or pseudomembranous tracheobronchitis, including infec- are posttransplant and hematologic malignancy patients,
tion of the anastomotic site, has been described [26,27]. but aspergillosis of the CNS has also been reported in AIDS,
Chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis is due chronic asthma with steroid use, burn patients, patients
to locally destructive invasion of lung parenchyma by with hepatic failure, and infections in the postoperative
Aspergillus without distal invasion or dissemination to period. Cultures from non-CNS sites (most of which are
other organs [4,16]. Patients usually have chronic underly- from lung) are positive for Aspergillus in approximately
ing lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary half the patients with CNS aspergillosis [37]. Pathology
disease (COPD), and present with fever, cough productive reports from a series of CNS aspergillosis cases diagnosed
of sputum, and weight loss over a period of several months. by autopsy described hemorrhagic necrosis, abscesses, large
In immunocompromised patients (neutropenia, cortico- hemorrhages, bland nonhemorrhagic infarctions, myelitis,
steroid use, transplant recipients, hematologic malignancy, mycotic aneurysm, basilar meningitis, sino-orbital disease,
cytotoxic chemotherapy, AIDS), invasive pulmonary asper- carotid artery invasion and thrombosis, dural abscesses, as
gillosis (IPA) may develop, remaining largely asymptomatic well as findings of minimal inflammation in CNS lesions
early on or presenting with non-specific signs, such as fever, [37]. Imaging studies of patients with cerebral aspergillosis
cough and dyspnea. Pleuritic chest pain and hemoptysis reveal three general patterns: single or multiple infarcts, ring
may also be present, as can altered mental status and respi- lesions (single or multiple) consistent with abscess forma-
ratory failure. IPA is characterized by being more invasive tion after infarction, and dural or vascular infiltration aris-
than chronic necrotizing aspergillosis as it includes inva- ing from the paranasal sinuses or orbits. Other findings on
sion of small vessels with hemorrhage and/or infarction and imaging include mycotic aneurysm and contrast enhance-
the possibility of dissemination [4,16,28]. Radiologically, ment of affected parenchyma, as well as hemorrhagic trans-
alveolar infiltrates, either bilateral or diffuse, nodules, formation of infarcted areas [38]. Galactomannan detection
cavitation, and pleural effusion can be present. Review of in cerebrospinal may be an important adjunctive tool for
the baseline chest CT findings from 235 patients with IPA, the diagnosis of cerebral aspergillosis.
who participated in the global multicenter trial comparing The cumulative incidence of IA in the United States for
voriconazole with amphotericin B for treatment of inva- two of the highest populations at risk, HSCT and SOT recip-
sive aspergillosis (IA) revealed that, at presentation, most ients, has been reported from the Transplant-Associated
patients (94%) had one or more macronodules [29]. In Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) multicenter
patients with neutropenia and IPA, the CT scan may have a studies [39,40]. In the HSCT population, Aspergillus now
nodule surrounded by ground glass attenuation, the classic exceeds Candida as the most common invasive fungal
halo sign. As this occurs early, it allows the presumption of pathogen with a cumulative incidence at 12 months of 1.6%
IPA diagnosis to be made prior to cavitation. However, this and a one-year overall mortality rate of 75% [39]. In the SOT
lesion is transitory and by the first week, three-fourths of population, the 12-month cumulative incidence of IA was
the CT halo signs disappear. With recovery of the neutro- lower (0.7%) as was the mortality rate (41%) [40].
phil count, an air crescent sign (representing early cavita- In the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance
tion) may be seen, which is highly indicative of IPA [30]. In Registry, a cohort of 960 cases of proven/probable inva-
addition to radiological signs, serological markers, such as sive aspergillosis reported from 2004 to 2008 in North
circulating galactomannan or 1,3-β-d-glucan in serum or America, 48.3% of patients had hematologic malignancies
galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, are impor- and 29.2% were SOT recipients, 33.8% were neutropenic
tant diagnostic tools as microbiological documentation of and 27.9% were HSCT recipients [41]. The lung was the
Aspergillus spp. by standard culture methods is often lack- most common site of infection (76% of cases). Most com-
ing [31,32]. Molecular methods (PCR) targeting ribosomal mon sites of extrapulmonary aspergillosis were the tra-
rRNA (18S) or the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) are also cheobronchial tree, sinuses, skin/soft tissues and central
adjunctive tools for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis [33]. nervous system. Among patients with a positive culture,
Pre-emptive strategies that combine screening with these A. fumigatus accounted for 72.6% of cases, followed by
markers coupled with chest CT are common practice for the A. flavus (9.9%), A. niger (8.7%) and A. terreus (4.3%).
early diagnosis and management of high-risk onco-hema- In 25% of cases, the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis
tological patients [34]. Guidelines have been established by relied on a positive galactomannan and/or histopathologic
the European Organization for Research and Treatment examination of tissue biopsy without Aspergillus growth
of Cancer (EORTC) and Mycoses Study Group (MSG) to in culture. The proportion of cases for which a positive
assess the probability of invasive aspergillosis on the basis galactomannan in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)
of host criteria, clinical and radiological signs, and micro- is the only microbiologic diagnostic criterion was as high
biology results [35]. as 50%–80% in recent cohort studies [42,43].
14 Epidemiology of fungal infections: What, where, and when
Fifty-four patients were allogeneic and seven were autolo- A study of Fusarium infection conducted in Israel
gous BMT recipients. Disseminated infection with metastatic reported a slightly different clinical scenario, with 76%
skin lesions was the most frequent presentation (75%) fol- patients considered immunocompetent [91]. These tended
lowed by fungemia alone (11%). Lung infiltrates were seen to be older patients who had ischemic heart disease, diabe-
in 64% and sinusitis in 36% of the cases. Presenting symp- tes, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic renal failure as
toms included fever (92%) and papular or nodular skin the underlying disease. Of the mycologic data available, 10
lesions with or without central necrosis [88,89]. At the time infections were with Fusarium oxysporum, 8 were F. solani,
of diagnosis, 46% of the patients were neutropenic, and and 4 were F. dimerum. The proportion of disseminated and
most had acute or chronic GvHD. There was a trimodal localized disease was about equal in immunocompetent and
distribution of infection: an “early peak” was seen prior immunosuppressed patients, and as in the BMT popula-
to engraftment (median posttransplant day 16), a “second tion, skin ulcerations were a common clinical presentation.
peak” was seen late (median posttransplant day 64), and a Risk factors for infection were hematologic malignancy,
“very late” third peak was observed after posttransplant day immunosuppression, burns, other disseminated infec-
360. Mortality was very high at 75%–90%, and median sur- tions, and chronic renal failure. Mortality was 11% during
vival after diagnosis was 13 days, with only 13% of patients hospitalization, significantly lower than that reported in the
alive at 90 days [89]. Persistent neutropenia and corticoste- BMT series.
roid treatment were significant prognostic factors [88,89]. Isolated outbreaks of Fusarium keratitis associated with
A recent study identified treatment with antithymocyte contact lenses have been reported from several states in the
globulin, acute myeloid leukemia and hyperglycemia as United States [92]. Most outbreaks have been traced to con-
independent risk factors for invasive fusariosis in the early taminated contact lens fluids [93]. Fusarium has also been
phase after allogeneic HSCT, while an association with isolated from a hospital water reservoir during an outbreak
non-myeloblative conditioning regimen, severe GvHD of fusariosis [94]. The epidemiologic investigation deter-
and previous invasive mold disease was found during the mined that aerosolization occurring during showers consti-
later phase [90]. tuted the potential source of infection.
16 Epidemiology of fungal infections: What, where, and when