Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cal-01 R0
Cal-01 R0
Cal-01 R0
1
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
CALCULATIONS REF
CONTENTS
1.0 SCOPE - 3
2.0 REFERENCES - 3
3.0 DESIGN INPUT - 3
4.0 DETAILED SITE OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSION - 3
5.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY - 5
6.0 LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS - 7
7.0 DESIGN CHECK - 10
8.0 SUPPORT REACTIONS - 12
9.0 BASE PLATE DESIGN - 13
10. 0 FOUNDATION DESIGN - 15
11.0 STAAD OUTPUT FILE - 26
12.0 REFERENCES - 37
2
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
1.0 SCOPE
These document covers the analysis and design of 2 car parking shelters (Chetah
Type & Falcon type) at BANAGAS.Analysis and design has been done in STAAD Pro.
Connection deisgn has been done using LIMCON Software.
2.0 REFERENCES
BS 5950-1-2000 - Structural use of steel work in steel buildings.
BS 6399-2 : 1997- Code of practice for wind loads
Cheetah type
3
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
Cheetah type
Falcon type
Falcon type
4
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
5
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
6
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
7
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
8
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
STAAD model showing Wind load for all ξ-Falcon Type car shed
STAAD model showing Wind load for ξ=0-Falcon Type car shed
9
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
Falcon type car shed -STAAD Model showing member stress ratios
10
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
Design of purlin
Spacing of purlins = 1.5 m
Span of purlin = 7.50 m
Self weight of solar panels = 0.11 kN/m2
Purlin section = 200Z20
Section Modulus of section = 4E+04 mm3
Moment of inertia = 4E+06 mm4
Grade of steel = 345 N/mm2
Self weight of purlin = 5.42 kg/m
Total dead load = 0.22 kN/m
Roof angle = 3 Degree
Considering bending momen normal to the rafter plane
Dead load normal to the rafter plane = 0.22 kN/m
Wind load for all ξ = 0.26 kN/m2
Wind load for for ξ =0 = -0.33 kN/m2 [critical]
Considering as continous support case
Case-1 : DL+WL( for ξ=0)
Maximum bending moment = -4.04 kN-m
Capacity of the section = 5.39 kN-m Refer to table
Case-2 : DL+WL( for all ξ) below
Maximum bending moment = 3.42 kN-m
Capacity of the section = 5.39 kN-m Refer to table
below
11
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
12
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
c = 60 mm
Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 14.5 kN/mm2
Modulus of elasticity of steel = 200 kN/mm2
Modular ratio = 13.8
Area of tension bolts.As for M30 = 2827.4 mm2
k1 = 7066
k2 = 3E+06
k3 = -2E+09
Solving the below equation
y3 + 3 * ( e - L/2 ) * y2 + 6* n * As * ( f + e ) * y - 6 * n * As * ( L/2 + f ) * ( f +e ) = 0
y (nueatral axis depth) = 346.66 mm
Total tension = 127.45 kN
Tension per bolt = 31.863 kN
Grade of concrete = 45 N/mm2
2
Bond stress required = 3.35 N/mm
Embedement length required = 100.8 mm
Provided embedment length = 900 mm
13
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
14
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
15
Project Job no.
FALCON TYPE CAR SHED
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECK 1
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
M 18/07/2018
500
1000
Column details
Column base length; lA = 1000 mm
Column base width; bA = 500 mm
Column eccentricity in x; ePxA = 0 mm
Column eccentricity in y; ePyA = 0 mm
Soil details
Density of soil; ρsoil = 20.0 kN/m3
Design shear strength; φ’ = 25.0 deg
Design base friction; δ = 19.3 deg
Allowable bearing pressure; Pbearing = 150 kN/m2
Axial loading on column
Dead axial load on column; PGA = 23.0 kN
Imposed axial load on column; PQA = 0.0 kN
Wind axial load on column; PWA = 18.0 kN
Total axial load on column; PA = 41.0 kN
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FGsur = 0.000 kN/m2
Imposed surcharge load; FQsur = 0.000 kN/m2
Pad footing self weight; Fswt = h × ρconc = 23.750 kN/m2
Soil self weight; Fsoil = hsoil × ρsoil = 0.000 kN/m2
Total foundation load; F = A × (FGsur + FQsur + Fswt + Fsoil) = 11.9 kN
16
Project Job no.
FALCON TYPE CAR SHED
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECK 2
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
M 18/07/2018
2 2
74.0 kN/m 137.6 kN/m
2 2
74.0 kN/m 137.6 kN/m
17
Project Job no.
FALCON TYPE CAR SHED
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECK 3
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
M 18/07/2018
18
Project Job no.
FALCON TYPE CAR SHED
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION DESIGN CHECK 4
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
M 18/07/2018
Material details
Characteristic strength of concrete; fcu = 45 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of reinforcement; fy = 500 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of shear reinforcement; fyv = 500 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement; cnom = 30 mm
Moment design in x direction
Diameter of tension reinforcement; φxB = 16 mm
Depth of tension reinforcement; dx = h - cnom - φxB / 2 = 912 mm
4 No. 16 dia. bars btm (150 c/c), 4 No. 16 dia. bars top (150 c/c)
19
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 1
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
500
1500
500
2400
Column details
Column base length; lA = 1000 mm
Column base width; bA = 500 mm
Column eccentricity in x; ePxA = -700 mm
Column eccentricity in y; ePyA = 0 mm
Soil details
Density of soil; ρsoil = 18.0 kN/m3
Design shear strength; φ’ = 25.0 deg
Design base friction; δ = 19.3 deg
Allowable bearing pressure; Pbearing = 150 kN/m2
Axial loading on column
Dead axial load on column; PGA = 16.0 kN
Imposed axial load on column; PQA = 0.0 kN
Wind axial load on column; PWA = 11.0 kN
Total axial load on column; PA = 27.0 kN
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FGsur = 0.000 kN/m2
Imposed surcharge load; FQsur = 0.000 kN/m2
Pad footing self weight; Fswt = h × ρconc = 11.250 kN/m2
Soil self weight; Fsoil = hsoil × ρsoil = 8.100 kN/m2
Total foundation load; F = A × (FGsur + FQsur + Fswt + Fsoil) = 69.7 kN
20
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 2
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
2 2
0.0 kN/m 54.8 kN/m
2 2
0.0 kN/m 54.8 kN/m
21
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 3
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
22
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 4
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
Material details
Characteristic strength of concrete; fcu = 45 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of reinforcement; fy = 500 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of shear reinforcement; fyv = 500 N/mm2
Nominal cover to reinforcement; cnom = 30 mm
Moment design in x direction
Diameter of tension reinforcement; φxB = 12 mm
Depth of tension reinforcement; dx = h - cnom - φxB / 2 = 414 mm
23
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 5
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
Calculate ultimate punching shear force at perimeter of 1.5 d from face of column
Ultimate pressure for punching shear; qpuA1.5d = q4u-[(L/2-ePxA-lA/2-
1.5×d)+(L/2+ePxA+lA/2+1.5×d)/2]×Cx/B+[B/2]×Cy/L = 24.745 kN/m2
Average effective depth of reinforcement; d = (dx + dy) / 2 = 408 mm
Area loaded for punching shear at column; ApA1.5d = (L/2+ePxA+lA/2+1.5×d)×B = 2.418 m2
Length of punching shear perimeter; upA1.5d = B = 1500 mm
Ultimate shear force at shear perimeter; VpuA1.5d = PuA + (Fu / A - qpuA1.5d) × ApA1.5d = 43.470 kN
Effective shear force at shear perimeter; VpuA1.5deff = VpuA1.5d×[1.25+1.5×abs(MxuA)/(VpuA1.5d×B)] = 137.007 kN
Punching shear stresses at perimeter of 1.5 d from face of column (cl 3.7.7.2)
Design shear stress; vpuA1.5d = VpuA1.5deff / (upA1.5d × d) = 0.224 N/mm2
24
Project Job no.
BANAGAS CAR PARKING SOLAR ROOF 1804
Calcs for Start page no./Revision
FOUNDATION CHECK FOR CHEETAH SOLAR ROOF 6
Calcs by Calcs date Checked by Checked date Approved by Approved date
VM 18/07/2018 VM
8 No. 12 dia. bars btm (200 c/c), 8 No. 12 dia. bars top (200 c/c)
Shear at d from column face
25
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
26
PAGE NO. 1
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro V8i SELECTseries5 *
* Version 20.07.10.65 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= JUL 17, 2018 *
* Time= 22:19:34 *
* *
* USER ID: Hewlett-Packard *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: FALCON_R0.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 04-JUL-18
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0 3.85 0; 3 6 3.25 0; 4 -6 3.25 0
9. MEMBER INCIDENCES
10. 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 2 4
11. DEFINE MATERIAL START
12. ISOTROPIC STEEL
13. E 2.05E+008
14. POISSON 0.3
15. DENSITY 76.8195
16. ALPHA 1.2E-005
17. DAMP 0.03
18. TYPE STEEL
19. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
20. END DEFINE MATERIAL
21. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
22. 1 TAPERED 0.516 0.004 0.516 0.2 0.008 0.2 0.008
23. 2 3 TAPERED 0.51 0.004 0.26 0.15 0.005 0.15 0.005
24. CONSTANTS
25. MATERIAL STEEL ALL
26. SUPPORTS
27. 1 FIXED
28. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE DEAD LOAD
29. **SELFWEIGHT Y -1
30. MEMBER LOAD
31. 2 3 UNI GY -1.5
32. *LOAD 2 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE LIVE LOAD
33. *MEMBER LOAD
34. *2 3 UNI GY -4.275
35. LOAD 3 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE WIND ALONG -X
36. MEMBER LOAD
37. 2 3 UNI GY -1.46
38. 1 UNI GX 0.3
27
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2
P R O B L E M S T A T I S T I C S
-----------------------------------
62. PARAMETER 1
63. CODE BS5950
64. PY 275000 ALL
65. KZ 2 ALL
66. LY 1.5 MEMB 2 3
67. RATIO 1 ALL
68. TRACK 0 ALL
69. LOAD LIST 201 TO 204
70. CHECK CODE ALL
28
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 3
29
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 4
71. FINISH
30
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 5
************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://selectservices.bentley.com/en-US/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2014 Bentley Systems, Inc.
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
31
PAGE NO. 1
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro V8i SELECTseries5 *
* Version 20.07.10.65 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= JUL 17, 2018 *
* Time= 22:14:20 *
* *
* USER ID: Hewlett-Packard *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: CHEETAH-SOLAR _R0.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 27-JUN-18
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0 2.3 0; 3 5.635 2.9 0
9. MEMBER INCIDENCES
10. 1 1 2; 2 2 3
11. DEFINE MATERIAL START
12. ISOTROPIC STEEL
13. E 2.05E+008
14. POISSON 0.3
15. DENSITY 76.8195
16. ALPHA 1.2E-005
17. DAMP 0.03
18. TYPE STEEL
19. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
20. END DEFINE MATERIAL
21. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
22. 1 TAPERED 0.516 0.004 0.516 0.2 0.008 0.2 0.008
23. 2 TAPERED 0.51 0.004 0.26 0.15 0.005 0.15 0.005
24. CONSTANTS
25. MATERIAL STEEL ALL
26. *
27. SUPPORTS
28. 1 FIXED
29. *
30. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE DEAD LOAD
31. SELFWEIGHT Y -1
32. MEMBER LOAD
33. 2 UNI GY -1.5
34. *
35. *LOAD 2 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE LIVE LOAD
36. *MEMBER LOAD
37. *2 UNI GY -4.275
38. LOAD 3 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE WIND ALONG -X
32
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2
P R O B L E M S T A T I S T I C S
-----------------------------------
65. PARAMETER 1
66. CODE BS5950
67. PY 345000 ALL
68. KZ 2 ALL
69. LY 1.5 MEMB 2
70. RATIO 1 ALL
33
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 3
34
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 4
74. FINISH
35
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 5
************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://selectservices.bentley.com/en-US/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2014 Bentley Systems, Inc.
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
36
Client : Consultant : Contractor :
Engineer : VM Date : 07/08/2018 Subject : Analysis and design of car parking shelters for Revision
Checked : AA Date : 07/08/2018 solar panels 00
12.0 REFERENCES
Code references & drawings has been attached.
37
BS 6399-2:1997 Section 2
2.2.3.2 For buildings with height H greater than the crosswind breadth B for the wind direction being
considered, some reduction in overall loads may be obtained by dividing the building into a number of parts
as follows:
a) buildings with height H less than or equal to B should be considered to be one part, as in Figure 11a);
b) buildings with height H greater than B but less than 2B should be considered to be two parts,
comprising a lower part extending upwards from the ground by a height equal to B and an upper part
which is the remainder, as in Figure 11b);
c) buildings with height H greater than 2B should be considered to be multiple parts, comprising a lower
part extending upwards from the ground by a height equal to B, an upper part extending downwards
from the top by a height equal to B, and a middle region between upper and lower parts which may be
divided into a number of horizontal parts, as in Figure 11c).
The reference height Hr for each part should be taken as the height to the top of that part. The diagonal
dimension, a, should be taken for the loaded area being considered.
2.2.3.3 The terrain and building factor Sb should be obtained directly from Table 4 and takes account of:
a) the effective height He determined from 1.7.3;
b) the closest upwind distance of the site from the sea in the range of wind direction Ú = ±45° around the
notional wind direction for the orthogonal load case, as defined with the pressure coefficient data for each
form of building;
c) whether the site is in country terrain or at least 2 km inside town terrain.
NOTE For all sites inside towns (except exactly at the upwind edge or at a distance of 2 km from the upwind edge) the simplifications
of the standard method produce a larger value of Sb than the directional method. If the loads produced by the standard method are
critical to the design, the use of the hybrid combination given in 3.4.2 should be considered.
Table 4 — Factor Sb for standard method
Site in country or up to 2 km into town Site in town, extending U 2 km upwind from the site
Effective height Closest distance to sea upwind Effective height Closest distance to sea upwind
He He
km km
m k 0.1 2 10 U 100 m 2 10 U 100
k2 1.48 1.40 1.35 1.26 k2 1.18 1.15 1.07
5 1.65 1.62 1.57 1.45 5 1.50 1.45 1.36
10 1.78 1.78 1.73 1.62 10 1.73 1.69 1.58
15 1.85 1.85 1.82 1.71 15 1.85 1.82 1.71
20 1.90 1.90 1.89 1.77 20 1.90 1.89 1.77
30 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.85 30 1.96 1.96 1.85
50 2.04 2.04 2.04 1.95 50 2.04 2.04 1.95
100 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.07 100 2.12 2.12 2.07
NOTE 1 Interpolation may be used within each table.
NOTE 2 The figures in this table have been derived from reference [5].
NOTE 3 Values assume a diagonal dimension a = 5 m.
NOTE 4 If He > 100 m use the directional method of Section 3.
38
Section 2 BS 6399-2:1997
Ve = Vs × Sb (12)
where
Vs is the site wind speed obtained from 2.2.2, for the range Ú = ±45° around the notional orthogonal
wind directions defined with the pressure coefficient data for each form of building;
Sb is the terrain and building factor obtained from 2.2.3.3.
39
BS 6399-2:1997 Section 2
Vs = Vb × Sa × Sd × Ss × Sp (8)
where
Vb is the basic wind speed from 2.2.1;
Sa is an altitude factor (see 2.2.2.2);
Sd is a direction factor (see 2.2.2.3);
Ss is a seasonal factor (see 2.2.2.4);
Sp is a probability factor (see 2.2.2.5).
NOTE In considering the range of wind directions ±45°, in accordance with 2.1.1.2, two approaches are possible:
a) the most onerous value of each factor in equation 8 is taken, leading to a single conservative value of Vs;
b) assessments of Vs are made at intervals through the range of direction and the largest value used.
In practice, option b) will not produce significantly lower values than a) unless the combination of location, exposure and
topography of the site is unusual.
40