Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

CBCT REPORT

Date:- 24/04/’24
Name:- Ravi Gupta Sex:- Male
Referred By:- Dr Anuj Biswas Area to be examined:- Left Mandible

 Clinical Information provided:- Implant supported Prosthesis planned wrt Mandibular left quadrant.

 Imaging Objective:-Evaluation of existing bone width and height for a possible Implant supported prosthesis.

 Imaging Procedure:- A CBCT Scan (VATECH__A-9) of the Mandibular arch was

acquired and reconstructed. The resultant images were evaluated.

(Slice Thickness = 1.0 mm)

RADIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS

REGION SLICE No. BUCCO-LINGUAL DISTANCE FROM THE


WIDTH MENTAL FORAMEN /
AT THE CREST MANDIBULAR NERVE

34 5 6.2 mm 21.9 mm
(Lower border of the Mandible)

35 10 5.2 mm 10.7 mm
(Mandibular Nerve)

36 17 7.2 mm 9.9 mm

37 27 5.3 mm 8.2 mm

 Bone Density:- Thin porous cortical bone on crest & fine trabecular bone within (D-3).

DENTAL FINDINGS:-
 Missing 34-38, 43-45.
 Generalized periodontal bone loss.
 Bridge 32-41, 42-48.

NOTE:- This report is not for Medico-Legal purposes. Page 1


Radiographic Impression is not a diagnosis. It should be co-related with the clinical findings
RADIOGRAPHIC IMPRESSION:-

 Partially edentulous mandibular arch.

(Advised Clinical Correlation)

Thank you for the referral and the opportunity to serve your patient.

Prof.(Dr) Ashish Aggarwal MDS


Oral & Maxillofacial Radiologist
Reg. No:- HN 1478-A

 NOTE:-

 CBCT is suboptimal for the visualization & evaluation of the soft tissues and fine bone details.

 Bone density values provided in this report are as determined by “Hounsefield units” derived from

the CBCT software. These values must be considered indicative and not representative.

 Presence of metallic and beam hardening artifacts may compromise assessment of fine and detailed

diagnostic tasks as integrity of restorative works, RC voids, periodontal defects etc.

 Please communicate your queries, if any.

NOTE:- This report is not for Medico-Legal purposes. Page 2


Radiographic Impression is not a diagnosis. It should be co-related with the clinical findings

You might also like