CHAPTER 1 4 3
Rationale/Background The rationale is stated clearly with
related trend, and issues in global
of the Study setting only
Statement of the The problems are stated clearly
with descriptive questions and
Problem differential or relational questions
with identified parameters
Hypothesis The hypotheses are stated clearly
with introductory sentence, null
and alternative hypothesis
Significance of the The significance of the study is
clearly stated how it will benefit the
Study environment, community, economy
and future researchers
Scope and Limitation The scope and limitation is clearly
stated with complete information
about its limitation, variables,
respondents, length of
experimentation, and location
Literature Review The literature review is organized,
grounded with critical and logical
details of variables and with
citations
4 3
CHAPTER 2
The research design is clearly
Research Design stated, explained its
appropriateness with supporting
literature
The research methodology is
Research comprehensively discussed. The
Methodology steps in conducting the study are
well discussed including the
testing procedures.
The data collection procedure is
Data Collection clearly stated, explained its
appropriateness with supporting
literature
The data analysis procedure is
Data Analysis clearly stated, explained its
appropriateness with supporting
literature
4 3
CHAPTER 3
The tables or figures and themes
Organizing Data are clearly stated with the
information needed
The data is clearly interpreted and
Interpreting Data discussed with implications and
conclusions
4 3
CHAPTER 4
The summary of findings is clearly
Summary of Findings stated based on the result of the
experimentation
The conclusion/s of the study are
Conclusion clearly stated based on the
summary of findings
The recommendations are clearly
Recommendation sated and mentioned what to
improve in the study
PANELIST
JUSTICE CECILIA MUNOZ PALMA HIGH SCHOOL
Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE)
SCORE SHEET FOR THE MANUSCRIPT
The rationale is stated clearly
with related trend, and issues
in local setting only
The problems are stated
clearly with descriptive
questions and differential or
relational questions without
parameters
The hypotheses are stated
clearly with null and alternative
hypothesis only
The significance of the study is
clearly stated how it will benefit
the environment, community,
economy only
The scope and limitation is
clearly stated with incomplete
information about its limitation,
variables, respondents, length
of experimentation, and
location
The literature review is
organized, grounded with
critical and logical details of
variables and without citations
The research design is clearly
stated, explained its
appropriateness without
supporting literature
The research methodology
discussed the steps in
conducting the study with the
testing procedures
The data collection procedure
is clearly stated, explained its
appropriateness without
supporting literature
The data analysis procedure is
clearly stated and explained
without supporting literature
The tables or figures and
themes are clearly stated
without trials, mean or
summary
The analysis and interpretation
of the data is discussed
properly without the
implications or conclusions
The summary of findings is
clearly stated but some are
missing from the result of the
experimentation
The conclusion/s of the study
are clearly stated but not based
on the summary of findings
The recommendations are not
clearly stated on how to
improve the study
2 1 RATING
The rationale is stated clearly The rationale is stated poorly
without related trend, and without related trend, and
issues issues
The problems are stated The problems are stated
clearly with descriptive poorly
questions
The hypothesis is stated The hypotheses are stated
clearly, with null or alternative poorly
only
The significance of the study The significance of the study
is not clearly stated how it will is stated poorly
benefit the environment,
community, economy and
future researchers
The scope and limitation is The scope and limitation is
poorly stated with incomplete not stated properly
information about its
limitation, variables,
respondents, length of
experimentation, and location
The literature review is not The literature review is poorly
grounded with critical and stated
logical details of variables
and without citations
2 1
RATING
The research design is The research design is poorly
clearly stated, but no stated
explanation about its
appropriateness
The research methodology is The research methodology is
discussed but not in an poorly stated
orderly manner
The data collection procedure The data collection is poorly
is clearly stated, but no stated
explanation about its
appropriateness
The data analysis procedure The data analysis is poorly
is clearly stated, but no stated
explanation about its
appropriateness
2 1
RATING
The tables or figures and The tables or figures, and/or
themes are not stated responses are poorly
properly and confusing organized
The analysis and The analysis and
interpretation of the data is interpretation of the data are
discussed incomprehensively poorly stated
2 1
RATING
The summary of findings is There is no summary of
poorly stated findings
The conclusions are poorly There is no conclusion stated
stated
The recommendations are There is no recommendation
poorly stated stated
TOTAL