Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design New Molecule and Insilco Prediction of Activity Against Breast Cancer Targeted PAR
Design New Molecule and Insilco Prediction of Activity Against Breast Cancer Targeted PAR
Design New Molecule and Insilco Prediction of Activity Against Breast Cancer Targeted PAR
Graduation Project
Submitted to the Department of Pharmacy/ Al Rasheed University Collegein Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelor in
Pharmacy
By
Athraa Qais Ibrahim
Teeba sadiq abd alrazaq
Al-Hassan anmar abd alameer
Supervised By
Assistant Lecturer Assistant Lecturer
HayderRaedFadhel Hawazin Aziz Hamim
2023 AD 1444 AH
Dedication
to our families ,
and
I
Acknowledgments
supervisors ,
II
Dedication I
Acknowledgment II
List of Contents III
List of Tables V
List of Schemes VI
List of Figures VI
List of Abbreviations VIII
Abstract IX
III
2.1. Computational softwares 16
2.2. Characterizition 16
2.2.1. Topological descriptor 16
2.2.2. Partitioning coefficients 16
2.2.3. M.Wt 17
2.2.4. Acid-base properties (PKa) 17
2.3. Scheme of design 17
2.4. General Technique to design our final compounds 20
2.4.1. Step one 20
2.4.2. Step two 20
2.5. Computational Methods 20
2.5.1. ADME procedure 20
2.5.2. Ligand and protein receptor preparation 21
2.5.3.Docking procedure 21
IV
Table Title Page
2-1 Represent programs and their function in our work 16
2-2 Demonstrate different functional Groups 19
3-1 Reprepresent chemical structures of final compounds with 22
Molecular Formula & Molecular Weight
3-3 Binding energies for final compounds (2a-e),(3a-e),(4a-e), 24
olaparib and reference drug docked with PAPR-1
3-3 Binding energies for final compounds and olaparib and docked 34
with PAPR-1
V
Scheme Title Page
VI
3-9 ADME study of compound (3d) 30
3-10 ADME study of compound (3e) 30
3-11 ADME study of compound (4a) 30
3-12 ADME study of compound (4b) 31
3-13 ADME study of compound (4c) 32
3-14 ADME study of compound (4d) 32
3-15 ADME study of compound (4e) 33
3-16 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 35
of Compound (2b) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-17 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 35
of Compound (2c) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-18 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 36
of Compound (3a) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-19 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 36
of Compound (3b) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-20 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 37
of Compound (3c) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-21 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 37
of Compound (3d) with active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-22 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 38
of Compound (4e) with active site of PARP1 enzyme.
Figure (3-23): Represent 2D and 3D shape with their
interactions bond of reference drug (olaparib) with
active site of PARP1 enzyme
3-23 Represent 2D and 3D shape with their interactions bond 38
of reference drug (olaparib) with active site of PARP1
enzyme
VII
# Abbreviation Explanation
VIII
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the widely deadly diseases worldwide. Breast cancer is the most
common type of cancer in the UK. Most women diagnosed with breast cancer are over
the age of 50, but younger women can also get breast cancer. The standard treatment
choices for solid tumors are still chemotherapy method to kill cancer cell by interfering
with DNA and RNA synthesis. Chemotherapies, however are restricted by their non -
specific modes of action, with normal cells also affected during therapy. Eighty per cent
of all new BC cases diagnosed are in response to overexpression of estrogen receptors.
Within the spectrum of breast cancer, triple negative breast cancer is known as a type of
breast cancer in which there is a lack of expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone
receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and overexpress of PARPI.
To identify new potential targeted anti-breast cancer agents, three different series each
one contain five derivatives were design and evaluated Insilco for targeted PARP1
enzyme. Evaluation methods were used before synthesis using molecular docking via
Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) Suite software. Docking results exhibited
significant binding affinity of most compounds compared to Olaparib as a reference
drug. Also Structures pharmacokinetic prediction of final compounds were done. The
result of docking for compounds with higher energy score are (-8.72, -8.82, - 9.10, -
9.89, -9.32 and -8.71) for compound (2b, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d and 4e) respectively, while than
Olaparib with energy score (-8.61). All final compounds shown high GIT absorption
except compound 3b.
IX