Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Criteria Percentage0-10

Weightage (%) 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100
Excellent Outstanding demonstration
LO1- Analyse the challenges Outstanding demonstration of
demonstration of of knowledge and
pertinent to projects in the knowledge and understanding
knowledge and understanding with excellent
digital era and the value of with excellent examples of
understanding with examples of application and
PPM theories and concepts Great demonstration application and justifaction.
Fair demonstration of Good demonstration excellent examples of justifaction. Also outstanding
to of knowledge and Also outstanding
No demonstration of Limited demonstartion Poor demonstration Fair demonstration of knowledge and of knowledge and application and demonstration of
underpin arguments and understanding with demonstration of
knowledge or of knowledge and of knowledge and knowledge and understanding with understanding with justifaction. Also fundamental understanding
decisions. 10% excellent examples fundamental understanding of
understanding (see understanding (see understanding. (see understanding. (see limited application and good application and excellent of drivers of digital
of application and drivers of digital
descriptor- A2) descriptor- A2) descriptor- A2) descriptor- A2) justification. (see justification. (see demonstration of transformation and
That is, the ability to identify justifaction. (see transformation and contextual
descriptor- A2) descriptor- A2) fundamental contextual implication for
the critical challenges from a descriptor- A2) implication for project
understanding of project management or
'project management point management or project
drivers of digital project managers. Also,
of view' in case study managers. (see descriptor-
transformation (see future trends consideration.
context A2)
descriptor- A2) (see descriptor- A2)

LO1- Analyse the challenges


pertinent to projects in the
digital era and the value of
Oustanding demonstration
PPM theories and concepts
of critical thinking or
to Great demonstration Oustanding demonstration of
analytical skills with
underpin arguments and of critical thinking or critical thinking or analytical
Fair demonstration of Good demonstration Great demonstration excellent application and
decisions. analytical skills with skills with excellent
No demonstration of Limited demonstartion Poor demonstration Fair demonstration of critical thinking or of critical thinking or of critical thinking or justification (see descriptor-
excellent application application and justification
critical thinking or of critical thinking or of critical thinking or critical thinking or analytical skills with analytical skills with analytical skills with A3). This is on the basis of
That is, demonstrating 15% and justification (see (see descriptor- A3). This is on
analytical skills (see analytical skills (see analytical skills (see analytical skills (see limited application and good application and excellent application peer reviewed extant
critical thinking and descriptor- A3). This is the basis of peer reviewed
descriptor- A3) descriptor- A3) descriptor- A3) descriptor- A3) justification (see justification (see and justification (see literature. Wider application
analytical skills by identifying on the basis of peer extant literature. Wider
descriptor- A3) descriptor- A3) descriptor- A3) of findings from context also
the relevant project reviewed extant application of findings from
considered. Future trends
management theories literature context also considered.
(logical, plausible) also
including PPM theories and
considered
concepts in discussing
implications for project
managers in view of context

LO2: Critically evaluate the


approaches and techniques
Great demonstration Excellent
used in project management Excellent demonstration of Outstanding demonstration
of knowledge and demonstration of
and select an appropriate Fair demonstration of Good demonstration knowledge and of knowledge and
understanding. knowledge and
methodology for managing a No demonstration of Limited demonstration Poor demonstration Fair demonstration of knowledge and of knowledge and understanding. Issues understanding. Issues
Issues sufficienty understanding. Issues
digital transformation knowledge or of knowledge and of knowledge and knowledge and understanding. Issues understanding. Issues sufficienty clear with excellent sufficienty clear with
15% clear with good CW sufficienty clear with
project - understanding (see understanding (see understanding. (see understanding. (see sufficienty clear but sufficienty clear with CW focus. Underpinned by excellent CW focus.
focus. Underpinned excellent CW focus.
descriptor- A4) descriptor- A4) descriptor- A4) descriptor- A4) lacks CW focus (see good CW focus (see excellent theoretical Underpinned by outstanding
by some theoretical Underpinned by good
That is, demonstrating descriptor- A4) descriptor- A4) justification (see descriptor- theoretical justification (see
justification (see theoretical justification
understanding and A4) descriptor- A4)
descriptor- A4) (see descriptor- A4)
knowledge of the case study
context
LO2: Critically evaluate the
approaches and techniques
used in project management
Great links of issues
and select an appropriate Great links of issues
identified to relevant
methodology for managing a Good links of issues identified to relevant Excellent links of issues Outstanding links of issues
Fair links of issues PM theories, tools,
digital transformation No links of issues Limited links of issues Poor links of issues Fair links of issues identified to relevant PM theories, tools, identified to relevant PM identified to relevant PM
identified to relevant techniques, models,
project - identified to relevant identified to relevant identified to relevant identified to relevant PM theories, tools, techniques, models, theories, tools, techniques, theories, tools, techniques,
PM theories, tools, framework with
That is, demonstrating PM theories, tools, PM theories, tools, PM theories, tools, PM theories, tools, techniques, models, framework with models, framework with models, framework with
15% techniques, models, clearly mapped
understanding of how case techniques, models, techniques, models, techniques, models, techniques, models, framework with clearly mapped clearly mapped linkages. clearly mapped linkages.
framework with poorly linkages.
study/organisation context framework (see framework (see framework (see framework (see clearly mapped linkages. Underpinned Underpinned by excellent Underpinned by outstanding
mapped linkages (see Underpinned by
drives the selection of descriptor -A5) descriptor -A5) descriptor -A5) descriptor -A5) linkages (see by good theoretical theoretical justification (see theoretical justification (see
descriptor -A5) some theoretical
appropriate PM descriptor -A5) justification (see descriptor -A5) descriptor -A5)
justification (see
methodology. descriptor -A5)
descriptor -A5)
Consideration of all case
study organisational context
critical
Excellent
Great demonstration
demonstration of
of knowledge and
LO3: Apply new and distinct knowledge and Outstanding demonstration
understanding with Outstanding demonstration of
forms of communication and understanding with of knowledge and
excellent examples knowledge and understanding
social engagement initiatives excellent examples of understanding with excellent
of application and with excellent examples of
such as co-creation, Fair demonstration of Good demonstration application and examples of application and
justifaction. Some application and justifaction.
collaboration, and co- No demonstration of Limited demonstration Poor demonstration Fair demonstration of knowledge and of knowledge and justifaction. Also good justifaction. Also excellent
demonstration of Also excellent demonstration
designing to stakeholder knowledge or of knowledge and of knowledge and knowledge and understanding with understanding with demonstration of demonstration of
10% fundamental of fundamental understanding
management for the understanding (see understanding (see understanding. (see understanding. (see limited application and good application and fundamental fundamental understanding
understanding of of impact digital
successful delivery of digital descriptor- A6) descriptor- A6) descriptor- A6) descriptor- A6) justification. (see justification. (see understanding of of impact digital
impact digital transformation on society
transformation descriptor- A6) descriptor- A6) impact digital transformation on society
transformation on (consumers), businesses and
projects - demonstrating transformation on (consumers), businesses and
society (consumers), Governments (see descriptor-
understanding of the case society (consumers), Governments (see descriptor-
businesses and A6) (see descriptor- A6)
study context businesses and A6)
Governments(see
Governments (see
descriptor- A6)
descriptor- A6)

LO4: Apply best practice


frameworks, concepts, and
principle in project
management to a project
and demonstrate the
ability to present this in a
project management plan-
Excellent coherence to Outstanding coherence to
Great coherence to final output and good Excellent coherence to final final output and good
That is coherence of applied Fair coherence to final Good coherence to
Limited coherence to Poor coherence to final output and relavance for business output and good relavance for relavance for business
theories, models, framework No coherence to final Fair coherence to final output and good final output and good
final output and final output and poor good relavance for decision making. business decision making. decision making.
that are clearly linked to output and no output and fair relavance for business relavance for business
limited relavance for relavance for business decision Excellent Excellent consideration of the Outstanding consideration of
business problems identified 15% relevance for business relavance for business decision making. Some decision making. Some
business decision business decision making. Great consideration of the project actor.Underpinned by the project
in case study. management decision making (see decision making (see consideration of the consideration of the
making (see descriptor - making (see consideration of the project actor. excellent theoretical actor.Underpinned by
plan that informs decision descriptor -A7) descriptor -A7) project actor (see project actor (see
A7) descriptor -A7) project actor (see Underpinned by good justification (see descriptor - outstanding theoretical
making with specific descriptor -A7) descriptor -A7)
descriptor -A7) theoretical justification A7) justification (see descriptor -
implication for project
(see descriptor -A7) A7)
management actors
specifically the implication
for the future “digital
worker” with “digital
culture” and organisational
digital infrastructure in the
digital era
Good peer reviewed Excellent peer
Good peer reviewed Outstanding peer reviewed
data sources, reviewed data sources, Excellent peer reviewed data
Sources & References with data sources, good use data sources, outstanding
Non peer reviewed Limited peer reviewed Poor peer reviewed Fair peer reviewed Fair peer reviewed Excellent use of Excellent use of sources, excellent use of
1. Sources (15%) of citation. Clearly use of citation. Clearly
20% data sources, no use of data sources, limited data sources, poor data sources, limited data sources, fair use citation. Clearly citation. Clearly citation. Clearly indicated
indicated indicated categorisation of
citation. use of citation use of citation use of citation of citation indicated indicated categorisation of data sources.
2. References (5%) categorisation of data data sources. No issues of
categorisation of categorisation of data No issues of reliability.
sources reliability.
data sources sources

You might also like