Introduc on Delhi follows closely behind with rentals ranging from Rs
As 31st March have approached many clients along with my 20,000-30,000 per month for the same space. Further, this fellow colleagues are asking me for HRA deduc on and its disparity con nues across ci es, with Bengaluru, Pune, eligibility, most of the client's fail to follow the guidelines in Hyderabad, and Kolkata falling in the range of Rs 17,000- the act and end up paying heavy fines and penal es due-to 25,000 per month. fake HRA's, in this ar cle we will discuss everything about Ahmedabad and Chennai stand out as the most affordable HRA including it's meaning, condi ons, case laws and ci es in terms of rent is ranging from Rs 17,000-19,000. The mistakes which is done by assessee. ques on that arises is whether it is equitable for HRA Meaning of HRA deduc ons to remain uniform across all ci es or if differen a on based on actual average rentals is more House Rent Allowance or HRA is an allowance given by an jus fiable. employer to an employee to cover the cost of living in rented housing. HRA is not en rely taxable, even though it is a part Hence in short it urges government to consider an individual of your salary. A por on of HRA is excluded from taxa on earning `10 lakh per annum (basic salary plus DA). At the 50% under Sec on 10 (13A) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, subject tax limit, this individual is eligible for a tax deduc on of Rs 5 to some provisions. lakh per annum or Rs 41,667 per month. However, in Mumbai, this deduc on might only secure a 1,000 sq feet Basic condi ons for availing HRA apartment, while in Chennai, it could afford double the space. 1. The employee should be a salaried This apparent tax advantage uninten onally favours individual and must receive HRA residents in ci es with lower average rentals. 2. Employee must actually be paying rent for a The recommenda on to include Bengaluru, Pune, re s i d e n a l a c co m m o d a o n h e /s h e Hyderabad, and Ahmedabad as metros for HRA calcula on is occupies undoubtedly overdue, as their rental landscapes mirror those of current metro ci es. However, a more nuanced approach is 3. Employee must not own residen al impera ve for HRA deduc on, par cularly when considering accommoda on for which HRA is being the diverse property rental rates across ci es, with Mumbai claimed and Delhi standing out as hotspots. The exemp on on HRA is calculated as minimum of the What are the provisions of TDS and PAN card? following three amounts It is mandatory to furnish the PAN card details of the 1. Actual HRA received from employer individual to whom rent is being paid if the annual rent 2. Rent paid minus 10% of basic salary exceeds Rs. 1 lakh. This can be done by submi ng Form 12BB to the employer. 3. 50% of basic salary if employee lives in a metro city or 40% of basic salary if the Alterna vely, if PAN details are not available, a declara on employee lives in a non-metro city from the landlord sta ng the same, along with their name and address, must be provided to the employer. Regarding Metro ci es in India and issues raised by Financial Express Tax Deducted at Source, for rent paid for land, building, (India) furniture, fi ngs, or a combina on thereof, TDS is applicable Currently, the defini on of metro ci es encompasses Delhi, at 10% of the total amount exceeding Rs. 2.4 lakh annually. Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata, However, as per the reports This is under sec on 194I for businesses or professions an cipa on surrounds the possibility of this defini on exceeding a turnover or gross receipts of Rs. 1 crore or Rs. 50 expanding to include burgeoning urban hubs like Bengaluru, lakh, respec vely, necessita ng tax audits. But for others i.e. Pune, Hyderabad, and Ahmedabad. The impetus behind this individuals or Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) not liable to expansion is to afford residents of these ci es a higher HRA undergo a tax audit, TDS is applicable at 5% on rent paid if it deduc on, poten ally catalysing migra on and urban exceeds Rs. 50,000 per month. This falls under sec on 194M. growth. Now you might be wondering about the reasons for no ces Further the ar cle on Financial express say's as per financial are being received by salaried employees with respect to express, as we delve into the house rental trends in these HRA ci es, a no ceable gap emerges. Mumbai, for instance, Recently Income Tax Department has sent more than 10,000 boasts the highest average rental of Rs 30,000-50,000 per No ces to salaried employees with respect of fake or non- month for a 1,000 sq feet apartment. compliant HRA. Conti... JAIPUR BRANCH OF CIRC OF ICAI 24 JAIPUR BRANCH OF CIRC OF ICAI TAX DEPARTMENT DETECTS HRA FRAUD WITH ILLEGAL USAGE OF PANS! What are the mistakes that are commi ed by salaried From the above case laws it is very clear that only the employees while claiming HRA as a Tax deduc on? following two condi ons need to be sa sfied first employee The first one is they are not making any rent agreement with m u s t a c t u a l l y b e p a y i n g r e n t fo r a r e s i d e n a l the party, this case is especially while paying rent to family accommoda on and must not own the residen al members for claiming deduc on in taxes, also in case of accommoda on for which HRA is being claimed. rela ves or friends who are earning less income. Remember Now what is the case? in case it happens to be a scru ny for your HRA deduc on it The cases first came to light when authori es found alleged may be disallowed if there is no rent agreement and you need rent receipts of around Rs 1 crore by an individual. Further to pay back taxes on the disallowed income along with probe revealed that the individual indeed did not receive the interest and penalty rent that was shown against his name. Secondly, many professionals and tax preparers rely just on The case prompted the income tax department to further rent receipt as evidence for claiming HRA, in this case, tax inves gate the ma er and it turned out that there was officer or AO might not get sa sfied and may demand more rampant misuse of PANs by unscrupulous individuals to claim evidence by the taxpayer and in the absence of that evidence tax deduc ons from their employers. So much so that officials may disallow the income have now come across cases where employees of certain Third is some employees are just concerned of bogus entries companies have used the same PAN to claim tax deduc ons. and do not pay rent in the bank account of the landlord, Tax officials have announced a crackdown on employees who especially while claiming rent paid to family members have made fraudulent claims, with the aim of recovering assuming to show rent paid in cash owed taxes. It remains uncertain whether legal ac on will be Case laws concerned pursued against these individuals. This situa on underscores In the case of Mrs. Meena Vaswani vs. ACIT [2017] 164 ITD another occurrence of PAN misuse, o en without the 120 (Mum Trib.), the assessee paid rent to her mother cardholder's knowledge. Complica ng ma ers further is the without providing any suppor ng evidence such as a leave current applica on of TDS only for monthly rents exceeding and license agreement or payment through bank Rs. 50,000 or annual payments surpassing Rs. 6 lakh. transac ons. The submission of mere affidavits and rent Consequently, many employees have exploited this loophole receipts from the mother was deemed insufficient. to evade taxes on rental income. Addi onally, upon inspec on by the Department, the claim Are employers liable for this? made by the assessee was disproved. Consequently, the Tax officials have emphasized that the responsibility rests Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) disallowed the HRA solely on the employee, absolving the employer of any exemp on to the assessee. liability, even in cases where mul ple individuals cite the My points: As I have explained this point above, that AO same PAN for rent payments. While employers are not might not get sa sfied and may demand more evidence in required to conduct extensive inves ga ons, they are case one solely has rent receipts expected to implement reasonable checks and balances In the case of Abhay Kumar Mi al vs. DCIT [2022] 194 ITD when verifying proof of rent paid for HRA exemp on. Some 224 (Del Trib.), a salaried individual had paid rent to his wife employers have established policies wherein employees for a house registered in her name, and the wife had her own found to have submi ed false claims for HRA or LTA shall face sources to acquire the property. The rent income was termina on from employment. declared as 'income from House Property' in the wife's In conclusion, the recent revela on of HRA fraud involving income tax return. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) illegal usage of PANs highlights a concerning trend of tax ruled that the Revenue's argument against the husband evasion among certain individuals. The Income Tax paying rent to his wife "lacks legal merit." The ITAT affirmed Department's crackdown on fraudulent claims underscores that it is legally permissible for a husband to pay rent to his the seriousness of the issue and the need for stringent wife. enforcement measures. While the responsibility primarily In the case of Bajrang Prasad Ramdharani vs. CIT [2013] falls on the employees making the false claims, there are calls 60SOT 66 (Ahd Trib.), the assessee paid rent to his wife for a for employers to exercise greater diligence in verifying proof house jointly owned by them, and they resided together in of rent paid for HRA exemp on. However, it's important to the same house. The rent was paid through bank transfers, note that employers themselves are not inherently liable for and rent receipts were submi ed as evidence. The Income such fraudulent ac vi es. Moving forward, it's crucial for Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concluded that the assessee both individuals and employers to adhere to tax regula ons fulfilled the condi ons of the provision, namely, occupying and uphold integrity in tax-related ma ers to maintain the the house and paying rent. Therefore, the assessee was integrity of the system. deemed eligible to claim exemp on under sec on 10(13A). My advice: File your ITR by taking genuine deduc ons and exemp ons to avoid any legal issues