Activity 01

Answers for the 2nd question.

Chart 1
• X and Y axes are not named.
• Marked data are wrong.
• The background of the chart is too dark.
• Data labels are not clear.

Chart 2
• The background of the chart is too dark.
• Chart is not clear.

Chart 3
• More complicated.
• Data representation method is not suitable.

Chart 4
• Difficult to understand.
• Chart is not clear.
• better to use colors.

Chart 5
• Chart is very complex.
• Unable to read data.

Chart 6
• Chart has rotated.
• Some parts are not visible.

Chart 7
• Can’t identify data.
• Chart is complicated.
Answer for the 3rd question

In chart 1, the chart is too dark, and it is hard to identify. Moreover, the chart is not numbered correctly.
For an example, unemployment rate in the month February is 8.9 and in November 8.6. But in the
chart, it is shown as 8.6 is greater than 8.9 which is impossible. In chart 2, chart is not clear and because
of that we can’t analyze data correctly. Chart 3 is too complicated to understand and hard to collect
data. Details in charts 4,6 and 7 are given in maps. Some of the details in charts are clearly mentioned
while some are not. Data can be missed while making decisions. This leads to wrong interpretations.
For an example in chart 6, Brazil is highlighted while other countries like Colombia and Argentina are
not highlighted. Because of that those countries can be missed. In chart 5, there are lots of charts in
it. Because of that, probability of wrong and missed data is high. As a whole, above-mentioned flaws
like unreadability cause for wrong analyzations, interpretations and decisions.

Activity 2

figure 1
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0

Units Unit Cost Total

 figure 2
7

6
6 6 6 6
5

4
4 4
3
3 3 3
2
2
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
9 19 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 99

Frequency Intervals

Sum of Units by Item

722 716

395

278

10

BINDER DESK PEN PEN SET PENCIL