PDF Climate Justice Integrating Economics and Philosophy Ravi Kanbur Ebook Full Chapter

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics
and Philosophy Ravi Kanbur

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-justice-integrating-economics-and-philosophy
-ravi-kanbur/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering, Fourth

Edition: Volume 3A: Chemical and Biochemical Reactors
and Reaction Engineering R. Ravi
https://textbookfull.com/product/coulson-and-richardsons-
chemical-engineering-fourth-edition-volume-3a-chemical-and-
biochemical-reactors-and-reaction-engineering-r-ravi/
Conservation: Integrating Social and Ecological Justice

Helen Kopnina
https://textbookfull.com/product/conservation-integrating-social-
and-ecological-justice-helen-kopnina/
Climate Justice and Human Rights 1st Edition Tracey

Skillington (Auth.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-justice-and-human-
rights-1st-edition-tracey-skillington-auth/
Iran’s Struggles for Social Justice: Economics, Agency,

Justice, Activism 1st Edition Peyman Vahabzadeh (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/irans-struggles-for-social-
justice-economics-agency-justice-activism-1st-edition-peyman-
vahabzadeh-eds/
Climate Economics: A Call for More Pluralism And
Responsibility Michael Roos
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-economics-a-call-for-
more-pluralism-and-responsibility-michael-roos/
Climate Technology, Gender, and Justice: The Standpoint

of the Vulnerable Tina Sikka
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-technology-gender-and-
justice-the-standpoint-of-the-vulnerable-tina-sikka/
Discourses on Sustainability: Climate Change, Clean

Energy, and Justice Elena V. Shabliy
https://textbookfull.com/product/discourses-on-sustainability-
climate-change-clean-energy-and-justice-elena-v-shabliy/
Climate justice in a non-ideal world First Edition

Heyward
https://textbookfull.com/product/climate-justice-in-a-non-ideal-
world-first-edition-heyward/
Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Cities and

Communities Integrating Strategies and Educational
Approaches 1st Edition Walter Leal Filho
https://textbookfull.com/product/implementing-climate-change-
adaptation-in-cities-and-communities-integrating-strategies-and-
educational-approaches-1st-edition-walter-leal-filho/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/8/2018, SPi
Climate Justice
Climate Justice
Integrating Economics
and Philosophy
Edited by
Ravi Kanbur and Henry Shue
1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Oxford University Press 2019
Chapter 2 © The World Bank 2019
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2019
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018939909
ISBN 978–0–19–881324–8
Printed and bound in Great Britain by
Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Contents
List of Figures vii

List of Tables ix
List of Contributors xi
1. Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy 1

2. Poor People on the Front Line: The Impacts of Climate Change

on Poverty in 2030 24
Julie Rozenberg and Stéphane Hallegatte
3. Governing the Commons to Promote Global Justice: Climate

Change Mitigation and Rent Taxation 43
Michael Jakob, Ottmar Edenhofer, Ulrike Kornek,
Dominic Lenzi, and Jan Minx
4. Equity Implications of the COP21 Intended Nationally

Determined Contributions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions 63
Adam Rose, Dan Wei, and Antonio Bento
5. Climate Change and Inequity: How to Think about Inequities

in Different Dimensions 95
Nicole Hassoun and Anders Herlitz
6. Climate Change and Economic Self-Interest 113

Julie A. Nelson
7. Noncompliers’ Duties 123

Anja Karnein
8. Divest–Invest: A Moral Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment 139

Alex Lenferna
9. Justice and Posterity 157

Simon Caney
Contents
10. Discounting and the Paradox of the Indefinitely

Postponed Splurge 175
Matthew Rendall
11. The Controllability Precautionary Principle: Justification

of a Climate Policy Goal Under Uncertainty 188
Eugen Pissarskoi
12. The Social Cost of Carbon from Theory to Trump 209

J. Paul Kelleher
13. Long-Term Climate Justice 230

John Nolt
Appendix: Declaration on Climate Justice 247
Index 251
vi
List of Figures
2.1. Chosen indicators for poverty and inequalities for four countries 28
2.2. Summary of climate change impacts on the number of people living
below the extreme poverty threshold, by source 34
2.3. Increase in poverty rate due to climate change in the worst case
climate change scenario considered 36
2.4. Income losses for the poorest 40 percent in each country and in our
four scenarios (y-axis) against average income losses 37
3.1. Revenues from carbon pricing under a 450 ppm scenario with full
technological availability 48
3.2. Current sources of tax revenues as well as potential of land taxes and
distributional effects 52
3.3. Total share of resource rents needed to simultaneously achieve
universal access to (a) water, (b) sanitation, (c) electricity, and (d)
telecommunication 54
3.4. Projected changes in economic rents accruing to fossil energy carriers
and carbon in mitigation scenarios, relative to baseline, over the
twenty-first century (in US$ trillion) 56
4.1. Lorenz curve in relation to population (countries ordered by per capita
COP21 emission allowances in ascending order) 67
4.2. Lorenz curve in relation to per capita GDP (countries ordered by
per capita GDP in descending order) 68
4.3. Marginal cost curves of GHG mitigation for California, EU, and
China in 2030 74
4.4. Macroeconomic marginal cost curves for China, EU, and California in 2030 78
4.5. Marginal cost curves of GHG mitigation for California, EU, and
China in 2030 (including fuel economy standards in California’s MAC) 80
4.6. Marginal cost curves of GHG mitigation for California, EU, China,
and India in 2030 84
5.1. Case 7 105
5.2. Inequality maps comparing countries and generations 107
5.3. Case 10 109
List of Tables
2.1. Impact of climate change on extreme poverty 35

4.1. Comparison of Atkinson index between the BAU scenario and COP21
scenario 70
4.2. Correlation of key variables 71
4.3. Basic data 74
4.4. Economy-wide emissions trading simulation among California, the EU,
and China in year 2030 76
China, and India (offset) in year 2030 85
A.4.1. Unconditional GHG mitigation pledges, 2030 89
5.1. Case 1 100
5.2. Case 2 101
5.3. Case 3 102
5.4. Case 4 103
5.5. Case 5 104
5.6. Case 6 104
5.7. Case 8 106
5.8. Case 9 108
List of Contributors
Antonio Bento is a Professor at the Sol Price School of Public Policy and the
Department of Economics of the University of Southern California. He is also a
research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and a research fellow
of the Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy. Professor Bento is an
applied microeconomist with a research program in the areas of environmental,
energy, urban, and public economics. His work has been published in leading journals
including the American Economic Review, the Journal of Environmental Economics and
Management, the Journal of Urban Economics, and the Energy Journal. Professor Bento
contributed to the New York State Climate Change Action Plan, the New York State
Biofuels Roadmap, the UN Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment,
served as a contributing author to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Fifth Assessment Report, and was recently appointed as a lead author to the Inter-
national Panel on Social Progress.
Simon Caney is Professor in Political Theory at the University of Warwick. He works on
issues in contemporary political philosophy, and focuses in particular on issues of
environmental, global, and intergenerational justice. He is completing two books—
Global Justice and Climate Change (with Derek Bell) and On Cosmopolitanism—both of
which are under contract with Oxford University Press. He is the author of Justice
Beyond Borders (Oxford University Press, 2005). He co-edited Climate Ethics: Essential
Readings (Oxford University Press, 2010) with Stephen Gardiner, Dale Jamieson, and
Henry Shue. His publications have appeared in journals such as Philosophy & Public
Affairs, Journal of Political Philosophy, and Politics, Economics and Philosophy. He has also
written reports for public bodies, including a background paper on ‘Ethics and Climate
Change’ for the World Bank, and a report on ‘Climate Change, Equity and Stranded
Fossil Fuel Assets’ for Oxfam USA.
Ottmar Edenhofer is Designated Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact
Research and Professor for the Economics of Climate Change at the Technical Univer-
sity Berlin. Moreover, he is founding director of the Mercator Research Institute on
Global Commons and Climate Change as well as adviser to the World Bank regarding
issues of economic growth and climate protection. He is a member of the German
National Academy of Sciences (Leopoldina) and of the National Academy of Science
and Engineering (acatech). He has published numerous articles in leading peer-
reviewed journals and high-ranking disciplinary journals and authored various books.
From 2008 to 2015 he served as Co-Chair of Working Group III of the Nobel Laureate
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, shaping the Fifth Assessment Report on
Climate Change Mitigation substantially, which has been considered a landmark

report and provided the scientific basis for the Paris Agreement.
Stéphane Hallegatte is the Lead Economist with the Global Facility for Disaster Reduc-
tion and Recovery (GFDRR) at the World Bank. He joined the World Bank in 2012 after
ten years of academic research. He was a lead author of the Fifth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He is the author of dozens of articles
published in international journals in multiple disciplines and of several books. He also
led several World Bank reports including Shock Waves in 2015, and Unbreakable in 2016.
He was the team leader for the World Bank Group Climate Change Action Plan, a large
internal coordination exercise to determine and explain how the Group will support
countries in their implementation of the Paris Agreement. He holds an engineering
degree from the École Polytechnique (Paris) and a PhD in economics from the École des
Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (Paris).
Nicole Hassoun is Associate Professor in Philosophy at Binghamton University and a
visiting scholar at Cornell University. She has published more than seventy papers in
journals like the American Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of Development Economics,
Journal of Applied Ethics, American Journal of Bioethics, and Philosophy and Economics.
Her first book, Globalization and Global Justice: Shrinking Distance, Expanding Obligations,
was published by Cambridge University Press in 2012 and her manuscript Global Health
Impact: Extending Access on Essential Medicines for the Poor is under contract with Oxford
University Press. Professor Hassoun also heads the Global Health Impact project
intended to extend access to medicines to the global poor. Global Health Impact
launched at the World Health Organization in January 2015. The project is intended
to assist policymakers in setting targets for and evaluating efforts to increase access to
essential medicines.
Anders Herlitz, PhD, is a researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm
where he works within the research program Climate Ethics and Future Generations
and leads the research project Good and Just Allocation of Health-Related Resources.
Dr. Herlitz’s work primarily focuses on value theory, distributive ethics, and population-
level bioethics.
Michael Jakob is a researcher at the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons
and Climate Change (MCC) in Berlin. Before joining the MCC, he spent more than five
years as a PhD student and postdoc researcher at the Potsdam Institute for Climate
Impact Research. He holds a PhD in economics from the Technical University of Berlin
and has obtained degrees in physics, economics, and international relations from
universities in Munich, St. Gallen, and Geneva. His research interests include climate
change mitigation in developing countries, the political economy of climate policy, as
well as the interlinkages between environmental policy and human well-being.
Ravi Kanbur is T. H. Lee Professor of World Affairs, International Professor of Applied
Economics and Management, and Professor of Economics at Cornell University. He
has served on the senior staff of the World Bank including as Chief Economist for
Africa. He has also published in the leading economics journals, including the Journal
of Political Economy, American Economic Review, Review of Economic Studies, Journal of
xii
Economic Theory, and Economic Journal. He is President of the Human Development

and Capabilities Association, Chair of the Board of United Nations University-World
Institute for Development Economics Research, Co-Chair of the Scientific Council of
the International Panel on Social Progress, member of the OECD High Level Expert
Group on the Measurement of Economic Performance, past president of the Society
for the Study of Economic Inequality, past member of the High Level Advisory Council
of the Climate Justice Dialogue, and past member of the Core Group of the Commis-
sion on Global Poverty.
Anja Karnein is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Binghamton University (SUNY)
where she teaches political philosophy and ethics. Her primary research interests
concern questions of climate justice and our duties to future generations. Since 2013
she has been editor of the domain “Climate, Nature, Ethics” of the interdisciplinary
journal WIREs Climate Change.
J. Paul Kelleher is Associate Professor of Bioethics and Philosophy at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison. He studies ethical and philosophical aspects of public policy,
especially health policy and climate change policy.
Ulrike Kornek received her PhD in economics from the Technische Universität Berlin
in 2015. After working at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, she
currently holds a position as a post-doctoral researcher at the Mercator Research Insti-
tute on Global Commons and Climate Change. Her research interests are in environ-
mental economics with a focus on international climate policy using numerical and
analytical modeling. She also holds a diploma in physics from the Otto-von-Guericke
Universität in Magdeburg, Germany.
Alex Lenferna is a Fulbright Scholar and PhC in the University of Washington Phil-
osophy Department, and an Endeavour Research Fellow at the University of New South
Wales’ Practical Justice Initiative Climate Justice Research Stream. His research focuses
on climate ethics and his PhD dissertation makes a moral case for a rapid and just
transition away from fossil fuels. Alex holds master’s degrees in philosophy from
Rhodes University and the University of Washington, completing the former as a
Mandela Rhodes Scholar. He received graduate certificates in both environmental
studies and climate science from the Universities of Kansas and Washington respect-
ively. Alex has recently served as a research consultant with 350.org, a fellow with
Carbon Washington, a leader on a number of divestment campaigns, and a climate
justice steward with the Alliance for Jobs and Clean Energy. He is a first-generation
South African whose family hails from Mauritius.
Dominic Lenzi is a post-doctoral researcher at the Mercator Research Institute on
Global Commons and Climate Change, in the working group Scientific Assessments,
Ethics, and Public Policy. He is a philosopher working on ethical and political issues
raised by climate change and the sustainability of the global commons. Dominic’s
current research focuses upon just entitlements to natural resources, and the ethics of
negative emissions.
Jan Minx, PhD, is head of the MCC Working Group Applied Sustainability Science and
Professor for Climate Change and Public Policy at the Priestley International Centre for
xiii
Climate at the University of Leeds. He takes an interdisciplinary research approach to

issues of energy, climate change, and sustainable development with applications to
cities and infrastructure, global supply chain networks, as well as historic and future
transformation processes of societies and their governance. Before joining the MCC,
he was Head of the Technical Support Unit of the Working Group on ‘Mitigation of
Climate Change’ of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) coordin-
ating the Working Group’s contribution to the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. He has
co-authored articles in scientific journals such as Science, Nature, Climate Change, and
the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences among others and is a member of
the editorial board of the journals Economic Systems Research and Carbon Balance and
Management.
Julie A. Nelson is Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Boston and
Senior Research Fellow at the Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufts
University. Her research interests include ecological economics, ethics and economics,
and feminist economics. She is the author of many publications including Economics
for Humans (University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, 2018) and articles in journals
ranging from Econometrica and Ecological Economics to Economics and Philosophy and
Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy. She is editor of the Economics and Business
Ethics section of the Journal of Business Ethics, and is the 2018 President-Elect of the
Association for Social Economics.
John Nolt is Distinguished Service Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the
University of Tennessee and a Research Fellow in the Energy and Environmental Policy
Program at the Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy. His main areas of research
are philosophical logic, formal value theory, environmental ethics, intergenerational
ethics, and climate ethics. He is the author or editor of seven books, three on logic and
four on environmental ethics—most recently Environmental Ethics for the Long Term
(Routledge, 2015). Nolt is a long-time environmental activist and proponent of sus-
tainable living, and for many years he chaired the Committee on the Campus Envir-
onment, which advises the Chancellor at the University of Tennessee on campus
environmental policy.
Eugen Pissarskoi is a member of the departments of Ethics and Education and Nature
and Sustainable Development at the International Centre for Ethics in the Sciences and
Humanities of the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen. Having studied philosophy
and economics at the University of Mannheim and the Free University of Berlin, he
received his PhD from the Institute for Philosophy, Free University of Berlin, with the
thesis “Climate Change and Social Welfare.” This has been published as Gesellschaf-
tliche Wohlfahrt und Klimawandel (2014) with oekom verlag. From 2010 to 2017, he was
researcher at the Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Berlin, and he worked with
the research group “Limits and Objectivity of Scientific Foreknowledge: The Case of
Energy Outlooks” at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in 2011. In his research, he
mainly focuses on decision-making under uncertainty, methodology of applied ethics,
and environmental ethics.
Matthew Rendall is Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of
Nottingham. Much of his work has focused on large-scale war and peace, including
xiv
such topics as the ethics of nuclear deterrence, whether there is a “separate peace”
among democracies, and collective security. He has a long-standing interest in Russian
foreign policy, particularly during the period of the Concert of Europe (1815–54). More
recently he has also been writing about intergenerational justice, climate change, and
other topics in moral philosophy and political theory.
Adam Rose is a Research Professor in the University of Southern California (USC)
Sol Price School of Public Policy, and a Fellow of the Schwarzenegger Institute for
State and Global Policy. Professor Rose’s primary research interest is the economics of
disasters. He has spearheaded the development of a comprehensive economic conse-
quence analysis framework and has done pioneering research on resilience. His other
major research area is the economics of energy and climate change policy, where he has
focused on the aggregate and distributional impacts of climate mitigation policy,
including advancing methodologies in both computable general equilibrium, and
macroeconometric modeling. Professor Rose is the author of several books and 250
professional papers, including most recently Defining and Measuring Economic Resilience
from a Societal, Environmental and Security Perspective (Springer), Economic Consequence
Analysis Tool (Springer), and The Economics of Climate Change Policy (Edward Elgar). He
was recently elected President of the International Society for Integrated Risk Manage-
ment and a Fellow of the Regional Science Association International.
Julie Rozenberg is an Economist with the World Bank Sustainable Development
Group. Her work includes green growth, climate change mitigation strategies, climate
change adaptation, and disaster risk management. She is an author of “Decarbonizing
Development: Three Steps to a Zero Carbon Future” and “Shockwaves: Managing the
Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty.” She focuses on helping World Bank teams and
clients take climate change constraints and other long-term uncertainties into account
in the preparation of projects and strategies, in order to build resilience in World Bank
client countries. She holds an engineering degree from the École Nationale Supérieure
de Techniques Avancées and a PhD in economics from the École des Hautes Études en
Sciences Sociales in Paris.
Henry Shue was the co-founder of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at the
University of Maryland (1976–87), the inaugural Hutchinson Professor of Ethics and
Public Life at Cornell University (1987–2002), and Professor of International Relations,
University of Oxford (2002–7). Best known for Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and
U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, 1980; 2nd edition, 1996), he published his first two
decades of writings on climate change as Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection
(Oxford University Press, 2014). His articles on the morality of violence appeared as
Fighting Hurt: Rule and Exception in Torture and War (Oxford University Press, 2016). He
is currently writing a series of articles on the urgency of action on climate change in
light of duties of justice to future generations.
Dan Wei is a Research Associate Professor in the Sol Price School of Public Policy of
USC. Her research focuses on economic modeling of energy and climate change policies
and economic consequence of natural or man-made disasters. She performed macro-
economic impact analyses of state climate action plans for several major states in the
US. She contributed to the capacity building on macroeconomic impact modeling of
xv
climate action plans in Guangdong, China and Baja California, Mexico. In the area of
economics of disasters, she made significant contributions in economic impact studies
of major disaster scenarios for the United States Geological Survey. She was a key
investigator in an National Science Foundation study to analyze dynamic economic
resilience of businesses to disasters and a Federal Emergency Management Agency
study to develop a disaster deductible/credit formula for post-disaster public assistance.
She recently led a study to develop and apply an economic framework to evaluate
resilience in recovering from major port disruptions.
xvi
Climate Justice: Integrating Economics

and Philosophy
1.1. Introduction
Climate justice requires sharing the burdens and benefits of climate change
and its resolution equitably and fairly. It brings together justice between
generations and justice within generations. In particular it requires that
attempts to address justice between generations through various interven-
tions designed to curb greenhouse emissions today do not end up creating
injustice in our time by hurting the currently poor and vulnerable. More
generally, issues of distribution and justice are of paramount importance in any
discourse on climate change. The United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) summit in September 2015, and the Conference of Parties (COP)
to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris in December 2015,
brought climate change and its development impact, including climate jus-
tice, center stage in global discussions.
In the run-up to Paris, Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland and
the UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Climate Change, instituted the
Climate Justice Dialogue.1 The objectives of the Climate Justice Dialogue were
“to mobilise political will and creative thinking to shape an ambitious and just
international climate agreement in 2015.” As part of this project, the global
High Level Advisory Committee to the Climate Justice Dialogue was formed in
2013. The Committee included former presidents and other leaders from the
fields of politics, science, business, civil society, and academia, and publicly
advocated for climate justice through their own work and via platforms
1
<http://www.mrfcj.org/our-work/climate-justice-dialogue/>.
Climate Justice
facilitated by the Mary Robinson Foundation. Together, they signed the

Declaration on Climate Justice, which is reproduced as an Appendix to this
volume.
Two of the academic disciplines which have engaged climate change and its
justice dimensions are economics and philosophy. We, an economist and a
philosopher, served on the High Level Advisory Committee of the Climate
Justice Dialogue. Over the three years of our service on the committee, we
noted the overlap and mutual enforcement between the economic and philo-
sophical discourses on climate justice. But we also noted the great need for
these strands to come together to support the public and policy discourse,
which does not—and cannot afford to—see things in separate silos. This
volume is the result.
In the broad policy and public discourse, “climate justice” has now become
a catch-all term for the intersection between patterns and paths of climate
change on the one hand, and their consequences for different conceptions
of justice on the other. There are many different formulations of climate
change, including the claim that it does not exist at all. And there are even
more perspectives on justice, with each conceptualization and specification
being deeply contested. Since climate justice is at the intersection of these
terrains, it is not surprising that it is also a topic where many academic
disciplines seek to make their contributions to a dominant policy issue of
our time. Outside of the natural sciences, philosophy and economics are two
disciplines central to the climate change discourse.
This volume has contributions from economists and philosophers who are
clearly aware of, and influenced by, the other discipline’s contributions. In
this overview we attempt to characterize the various approaches, how they
overlap and interact, and what they have already learned from each other and
might still have to learn. Section 1.2 provides a brief narrative of the overlap-
ping perspectives of economics and philosophy as seen through the chapters
in this volume. Section 1.3 presents a chapter by chapter account of the
volume. Section 1.4 concludes with a tentative exploration of some paths to
better integration of the two disciplinary approaches to climate justice.
1.2. Overlapping Perspectives
One way to frame how different disciplines can engage with climate justice
and the impact of alternative policies on climate justice, is to start with a
distinction between the positive and the normative. A first step in evaluating
any policy, which includes the policy of doing nothing, or continuing with
the “business-as-usual” scenario of the current policy, is to lay out all the
implications of that policy from now into the future. A second step is to
2
Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy
evaluate the normative implications of alternative policy paths. Of course

the two are not unrelated, because the effort we put into elucidating and
elaborating this or that implication of a policy will depend upon how import-
ant we think that implication is for the normative evaluation.
The natural sciences are paramount in developing the implications of
anthropogenic activities like greenhouse gas emissions on the climate. But
the implications of climate change for human and non-human well-being
bring us to the social sciences since it involves the organization and response
of economic and social relations to climate change. Here economic modeling
is central in predicting time paths of income and other economic variables
through a range of Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) as seen in the famous
Stern Review (Stern, 2007) and many other exercises. These exercises are
contested on the modeling, but they are the key input into the next step, of
evaluating the time path generated by different policies.
The specifics and details of IAMs appear to be the preserve of economists, but
it is in the evaluation of the alternative time paths generated by these models
that economists and philosophers overlap in their perspectives and have much
to learn from each other, and further integration between the two has a lot to
contribute to the policy discourse. The potential overlaps, and debates, can in
turn be put into two broad categories: (i) evaluation within a time period or
generation; (ii) evaluation across time periods or generations. Cutting across
these are issues related to focusing on economic outcomes versus a broader
range of considerations going beyond the narrowly economic.
Coming then to normative evaluation within a time period or generation,
one feature of note is that the Pareto criterion of economic textbooks, that in
comparing two scenarios one is pronounced to be superior if in it no one is
worse off and at least one person is better off compared to the other, is difficult
to find in economic analyses of climate change. Thus it is recognized that
there are gainers and losers from climate policy, within generations (and
across generations). The usual trope that economics ignores distribution is
not found in climate change analysis, as argued in Kanbur (2015). And it is not
found in the economics or philosophy chapters in this volume. Rather,
Rozenberg and Hallegatte (Chapter 2) project the consequences of different
scenarios for poverty in the year 2030. Rose, Wei, and Bento (Chapter 4) assess
the income distribution implications of emission reductions proposals in the
Paris Agreement according to different equity criteria. Jakob et al. (Chapter 3)
assess the equity implications of alternative uses of the revenues from a carbon
tax or other forms of taxation of natural resource rents. Philosophers Hassoun
and Herlitz (Chapter 5) focus on the issue of within-country and between-
country inequality.
In all of these exercises, the interflow and interplay between economics
and philosophy is strong, whether the contribution is from economists or
3
Climate Justice
philosophers. However, the assumptions of the economists are “neoclassical,”

with their models built on standard rational choice formulation of individual
behavior. Nelson (Chapter 6), an economist herself, critiques these assump-
tions as being inadequate characterizations of individual behavior, making the
point that they also restrict policy options available as they do not allow for
moral and ethical behavior on the part of individuals. Such behavior is
explored further by Lenferna (Chapter 8), who develops the position that
there are strong consequentialist and non-consequentialist arguments for
divestment from fossil fuels. Karnein (Chapter 7) addresses these issues at the
national level and suggests that when a country such as the US refuses to
comply with the Paris Agreement, it faces other moral duties as a noncomplier.
As might be expected, the time dimension, looking across generations, also
leads to significant overlaps between economists and philosophers, and it
also leads to significant debates—within economics and within philosophy as
well as between the two. The philosopher Caney (Chapter 9) explores the impli-
cations of the normative principle that policy in any generation should be so
directed as to leave future populations at least as well off as the present gener-
ation. As he notes, this is related to economics Nobel laureate Robert Solow’s
dictum that sustainability requires each generation to leave to the next “what-
ever it takes to achieve a standard of living at least as good as our own” (Solow,
1992, p. 15). It differs from Llavador, Roemer, and Silvestre’s (2015) perspective,
which adds a commitment to improve well-being over time.
The issue of discounting is not a focus in the Caney perspective but is central
to many debates in economics and philosophy. Famously, the Stern Review
(2007) was criticized, and praised, for using a very low discount rate to
evaluate the time paths generated by its IAMs. Weitzman (2007) criticized
the choice because actual interest rates in the marketplace were much higher,
which in turn raised the question of why market interest rates should be used
for normative evaluation. Rendall (Chapter 10) takes up the standard reason
given in economics as to why there should be discounting of the future—that
without it there could be no ranking of alternative time paths extending
to infinity; discounting is needed to give finite values so alternatives can
be compared. Rendall’s answer is to supplement discounting with avoiding
the risk of extinction or permanent impoverishment. A version of a similar
perspective, centered on his Controllability Precautionary Principle (CPP), is
advanced by Pissarskoi (Chapter 11). He argues for interpreting the CPP to
require reducing CO2 concentrations to the pre-industrial level of 280 parts
per million, to most decisively avoid devastation of the planet.
Supplementation of a discounted sum of benefits into the future with other
morally relevant considerations is also present, as an exposition and a critique,
in the focus by Kelleher (Chapter 12) on the standard economic formulation
of evaluating time paths of well-being as put forward by Ramsey (1928)
4
which is simply the sum of discounted per capita utilities of each generation
multiplied by the number of people in that generation. This is clearly a
utilitarian social welfare function, but Kelleher further characterizes the
Ramsey approach, which is basically the economist approach as exemplified
by Stern (2007), as being one where
the betterness ordering . . . is ipso facto a rightness ordering, where a rightness order-
ing ranks feasible paths in terms of everything that matters to policy choice. . . .
Many philosophers will be comfortable with (and all philosophers will be familiar
with) the idea . . . that value considerations cannot by themselves fully determine
proper choice from among feasible policy options. Climate economists, in my
experience, find this a harder idea to make sense of. (Kelleher, Chapter 12)
One example of concern with broader considerations than just the valuation
of time paths would be a focus on the injustice of harm done to humans who
will be killed, even in the very distant future, as a result of choices about
climate change made now. This thesis is developed by Nolt (Chapter 13).
Thus the overlaps and interactions between economic and philosophical
perspectives are manifold. On the spectrum from positive to normative
analysis of policy options, economics dominates at the positive end while
philosophical contributions are primarily at the normative end, especially in
highlighting the thinking through of a range of principles for climate justice.
Economics relies on these, as seen in the assessment of the equity of the Paris
Agreement. But economists appear to be most comfortable with a utilitarian
framework of analysis, while philosophers push further and harder for con-
sideration of non-consequentialist frames of evaluation. Further routes to
integration will be discussed in Section 1.4, but we now turn to a more detailed
account of the chapters in the volume.
1.3. The Volume Chapters
With the narrative framework of Section 1.2, this section provides a brief
account of each of the chapters. The volume begins with a chapter that
in its very title evokes a concern with the distributional impact of climate
change, going against the standard characterization of economists as being
concerned only with gross domestic product (GDP) and not with its distri-
bution. Chapter 2, “Poor People on the Front Line: The Impacts of Climate
Change on Poverty in 2030” by Julie Rozenberg and Stéphane Hallegatte,
develops alternative scenarios with no climate change as the baseline. The
drivers of poverty are modeled and applied to data for ninety-two countries.
These drivers include demography, sectoral shifts in production, productivity,
and economic growth, as well as distributional policy. In the framework
5
Climate Justice
of this model, two scenarios, “prosperity” and “poverty,” are compared to

each other.
Into this set-up they then introduce the impacts of climate change on
agricultural incomes, disease, natural disasters, etc. For example, food prices
and agricultural incomes are derived from the global agricultural model of
Havlík et al. (2015). For malaria, they use the work of Caminade et al. (2014),
which provides estimates of malaria increase due to climate change. Given the
uncertainty surrounding the quantitative estimates of these impacts, they
consider a high-impact and low-impact scenario. This gives them four cases
to compare, crossing “prosperity” and “poverty” with high and low climate
change impact.
In the poverty scenario, the one where distributional policy is not support-
ive of poverty reduction, they estimate that 122 million more people will be in
income poverty in 2030 with a high impact of climate change, compared with
no climate change. At the other end, in the prosperity scenario when distri-
butional policy is supportive, with low impact of climate change there are
three million more poor people in poverty at the end of the scenario period
in 2030. The authors emphasize that this range primarily reflects policy
choices—how the impact of climate change is minimized and how distribu-
tional policies work to support poverty reduction. But even these numbers,
although they are disaggregated in terms of distribution, are global aggregates.
The authors show that the impacts of climate change on poverty are parti-
cularly severe in Africa and in South Asia, where levels of poverty are
already high.
Chapter 2 plays through the fifteen-year consequences of the climate
change that is already “baked into” the system because of past greenhouse emi-
ssions. The next two chapters in the volume consider the immediate equity
implications of different forms of emissions reductions themselves, without
going into the implications of these reductions for climate change in the future.
Michael Jakob, Ottmar Edenhofer, Ulrike Kornek, Dominic Lenzi, and Jan Minx
address the distributional implications of mitigation in Chapter 3, “Governing
the Commons to Promote Global Justice: Climate Change Mitigation and Rent
Taxation.” The basic idea is that since reducing emissions in effect restricts the
use of the global commons of the atmosphere, it creates rents. The question
then is who gets the rents and how are they used?
Thus, as Jakob et al. detail, the Paris Agreement to limit temperature increase
to below 2°C means a global carbon budget of around 40 gigatons of CO2 per
year. This would require a carbon price in the range of $40 to $80 per ton. Such
carbon pricing could generate revenues of the order of $1 trillion to $10
trillion per year, depending on the specific integrated model used, by 2040.
This is a significant sum of money and could be used to address a range of
distributional issues, including the negative consequences of carbon pricing
6
for the poor of today. Jakob et al. then illustrate the close overlap between
economics and philosophy as they take the reader through the basic prin-
ciples which could guide such revenue recycling. They point out that there is
considerable debate not only on revenue distribution within a state but
redistribution across states: “In contemporary global justice debates, there is
deep disagreement about the extent of such redistributive claims. On the one
hand, cosmopolitans argue that robust principles of distributive justice ought
to apply globally, while minimalists argue that stronger principles apply with-
in states.” They go on to discuss the political feasibility and implementation
issues of the taxation of climate and natural resource rents.
Chapter 4, by Adam Rose, Dan Wei, and Antonio Bento, is in a similar spirit
to Chapter 3 by Jakob et al. but is more closely related to the Paris Agreement.
“Equity Implications of the COP21 Intended Nationally Determined Contri-
butions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions” looks in detail at the specific
proposals in Paris for allocating emission reductions across countries. They
first look at the country-specific reduction pledges and compare these to a
range of equity principles. Second, they allow trading of emissions allowances
across countries. Using a model of trading equilibrium they calculate the price
of the emissions allowance and the actual amount of sales and purchases that
would occur if trading were allowed. This permits them to once again assess
the equity implications of the initial allocation.
After reviewing a range of equity principles, Rose, Wei, and Bento focus on
(i) the egalitarian principle and (ii) the ability to pay principle. They interpret
the first as saying that emission allowances should be allocated in proportion
to population. On the other hand, they interpret the second as saying that
emissions reductions should increase with per capita GDP. These, and other
more detailed questions, are addressed using the COP21 Intended Nationally
Determined Contributions (INDCs) to reduce emissions. These were agreed
to by 195 countries, but translation into precise quantitative magnitudes
was possible for only a subset of the countries. They then conduct a series
of exercises such as comparing the Lorenz curve of the actual INDCs with
the implied Lorenz curve of the egalitarian principle and the ability to
pay principle. They find that the actual INDCs represent significant depar-
tures from these principles as measured by a number of inequality indices.
For emissions trading, the model is boiled down to a representation of
trading between regions—specifically, data are used for China, the EU, and
California. Once again the authors find that equity principles are violated
by the Paris INDCs. Indeed, although emissions trading is well understood
to reduce global costs of emissions reduction and is thus an efficient policy
to pursue, their calculations show that “wealthier countries stand to gain
a much higher proportion of the savings, thereby further worsening the
equity outcome.”
7
Climate Justice
The economist authors of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 build specific models to

predict the outcomes of various policies. Their normative evaluative focus
varies between individuals within a country (Chapters 2 and 3), across
countries (Chapters 3 and 4) and all individuals in the world (Chapter 2).
The philosophers Nicole Hassoun and Anders Herlitz bring together these
considerations in Chapter 5, “Climate Change and Inequity: How to Think
about Inequities in Different Dimensions.” As is made clear by the economic
models of Chapters 2, 3, and 4, “Climate change and climate negotiations
actualize equity considerations in at least three relevant dimensions: distribu-
tions of benefits and burdens across countries, within countries and across
individuals in the world.”
The authors give a number of examples where equity within nations, equity
between nations, and equity across all individuals in the world could move in
different directions. This can clearly happen in practice for a range of climate
mitigation efforts. They then proceed to discuss how the different types of
inequality could be weighed relative to each other. Although they do not
themselves present arguments as to why the weights might go one way or
another, they clearly raise an important set of issues for philosophers to
consider. Significantly, there is an overlap with economists’ work on decom-
posing world inequality into a within-countries and between-countries
component (see for example Lakner and Milanovic, 2016), and their reflec-
tions on inter-country differences as representing inequality of opportunity
(Milanovic, 2016).
The economic models of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 have as their base the
standard “ECON 101” rational choice model of the individual. Thus the
emissions trading mode of Chapter 4, although applied to countries, treats
them as individuals in a market where price adjusts to match supply of and
demand for emissions allowances. Implicit in the agricultural income model
of Chapter 2 is farmers’ rational response to climate change, determining
prices and incomes in agricultural markets. And although the framework of
Chapter 2 admits of externalities and market failures in the allocation of the
global commons that is the atmosphere, the overall economic analysis is still
in the framework of conventional welfare economics with rational choice
individuals. It is these assumptions which are questioned by Julie A. Nelson,
an economist, in Chapter 6, “Climate Change and Economic Self-Interest.”
Nelson provides a critique of economic approaches from the inside, so to
speak, though her critique is focused more on the basic model of choice that
is the bread and butter of economics, whether this model is applied to
individuals or to nations modeled as individuals. She starts with the position
of Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention
on Climate Change at the time of Paris, that national economic self-interest
would drive nations to agreement. While Nelson concedes that “there is some
8
truth to her argument,” she poses the following questions: “Is her assertion
about national, and human, behavior true? Is economic self-interest truly the
most powerful motivator? Is it really the best thing to rely on, in our search for a
sane and equitable solution to the climate change crisis?” Nelson’s answers to
these questions pose a challenge to the analytic basis of the economic method.
When an agreement leads to aggregate gains overall but there are gainers
and losers under that aggregate, what keeps the losers in the agreement?
Economists argue that “side payments” from the winners to the losers would
keep the agreement, but as economists who work on “mechanism design”
know, even with this there will be incentives to cheat after the agreement is
signed. Nelson quotes a well-known book by Posner and Weisbach (2010,
p. 170), who are ultimately forced to call on ethics as deus ex machina, outside
their “incentive compatibility” framework: “But the obligation to achieve a
broad, deep, and enforceable treaty imposes a serious ethical duty on rich and
poor nations alike—the obligation to cooperate. In our view, it is unethical for
a nation to refuse to join a climate treaty in order to free-ride off of others.”
Nelson goes on to elaborate on the accumulating evidence in psychology
and in behavioral economics, that human beings do indeed have strong
ethical motivations. Nelson refers to Sen’s (1977, p. 326) famous distinction
between “sympathy” and “commitment” as an early warning that all was not
well with economic orthodoxy: “If the knowledge of torture of others makes
you sick, it is a case of sympathy; if it does not make you feel personally worse
off, but you think it is wrong and you are ready to do something to stop it, it is
a case of commitment.”
Her critique is directed at economists who “seem to be belatedly ‘discovering’
the social nature of human beings.” The award of a Nobel prize in economics
to Richard Thaler (2017) holds out the hope that these perspectives may
become mainstreamed in economics, including in the economic analysis of
climate change. But in many ways Nelson’s critique is also hopeful for climate
agreements. She concludes by quoting Christiana Figueres to show that her
own motivations were not from self-interest, but from deep ethical roots.
The moral basis for action is also the focus of the next two chapters in the
volume. In Chapter 7, “Noncompliers’ Duties,” Anja Karnein explores the
possibility that those who have failed to fulfill their basic responsibilities
toward climate change, which includes scores of governments and large
numbers of individuals, ought to fulfill some specific other responsibilities as
a consequence of their noncompliance. Since so many are noncompliers, this
is a highly significant issue that is virtually untouched so far by either philo-
sophers or economists. It is, however, especially difficult to make sense of
particular duties for noncompliers when the option of compliance with the
original duty still remains open. Why wouldn’t the whole duty of a noncom-
plier simply be to become a complier?
9
Climate Justice
Karnein considers several conceptual avenues, including what she labels the
complementarity view. The original duty, for example, to reduce emissions a
specific amount, should be understood as complemented from the beginning
by a duty to, say, show respect for potential victims of climate change by
whatever one does. If one complies with the original responsibility, one ought
to do so in a respectful manner. And if one chooses not to comply fully with
the original duty to reduce emissions to a particular degree, the complemen-
tary duty to respect potential victims remains. And then fulfillment of the
complementary duty takes on an even more significant signaling role as a
means of showing that one’s decision not to fulfill the original responsibility is
not meant to indicate disregard for those who will be negatively affected
by one’s failure. If one complies with neither the original duty to reduce
emissions nor the complementary duty to show respect for potential victims
whatever else one does, one can reasonably be seen as displaying disregard for
anyone other than oneself.
In Chapter 8, “Divest–Invest: A Moral Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment,” Alex
Lenferna emphasizes both the variety of arguments in favor of divestment and
the extent to which they complement or overlap with each other. He builds
from an influential but philosophically inadequate argument in the activist
literature, refining and deepening it, while also mobilizing other types of
moral considerations. His fundamental argument is that a moral case can be
made for divestment from consequentialist as well as non-consequentialist
foundations:
The consequentialist moral case is grounded both in promotional duties to act on

climate change, and the responsibility to not contribute to the potential unneces-
sary, grave, and substantial harms associated with the fossil fuel industry’s con-
tinued business model. The non-consequentialist moral case asks institutions to
act with integrity and avoid the moral tarnish that comes from investing in, and
thus being supportive of and complicit in, the injustices and grave harms entailed
in the fossil fuel industry business model.
With regard to the objection that divestment is unlikely to have much effect,
Lenferna argues both that one can have a responsibility to act even when
the direct effects are imperceptible, and also that major institutions like
prominent churches, universities, and pension funds are in a position to
exert highly visible leadership that may inspire broader collective action. But
he also highlights the argument that divesting may be not only the right thing
to do for institutions, but also the smart thing to do since non-fossil forms of
energy are an essential part of a prosperous low-carbon future.
In all of the expositions so far, the issue of future generations has been
present, but it has not been considered in detail and in depth. For example,
whether and, if so, how to discount the future, has been in the background in
10
normative discussion. Even when, for example in Chapter 2 or Chapter 3,

time paths of economies were modeled, evaluation of the overall time path,
weighting up the present and the future, was not a central focus. But, of
course, evaluating the outcomes across generations is indeed central to the
economic and philosophical discourse on climate change, and the next block
of chapters tackles this issue in its various manifestations.
In Chapter 9, “Justice and Posterity,” working from the basic idea that
we ought not to leave future people worse off than we are, Simon Caney
compares a number of more concrete and detailed interpretations of that
fundamental thought. He then explains and defends his own interpretation
of a Principle of Justice for Future People as requiring the maintenance of a
system of equal capabilities at the highest standard of living which can be
enjoyed by those alive at one time and also leave future people with an at least
equally good set of capabilities. Unlike Llavador, Roemer, and Silvestre (2015),
for example, Caney allows, but does not require, making future people better
off. That the core requirement of justice is a maximal equal standard of living
is assumed from his own earlier work. But the period of time across which one
has responsibility for justice remains to be specified. To do this Caney intro-
duces a causal impact principle that explains why transtemporal duties extend
as far as foreseeable effects extend, which in the case of climate change is a
matter of centuries. He also explains why the effects should be calibrated on
the basis of capabilities and the equality of their distribution. Caney’s Prin-
ciple of Justice for Future People has, then, an absolute component: a duty to
promote the absolute standard of living of future people as far as one can
reasonably be expected to foresee so that they enjoy a standard of living that
is at least as good as we are entitled to have. And the principle also has a
distributive component: a duty to promote the realization of equality within
future generations.
The issue of discounting is taken on full force by Matthew Rendall in
Chapter 10, “Discounting and the Paradox of the Indefinitely Postponed
Splurge.” One of those things that “everybody knows to be true” is that
unless we discount future benefits, we would never enjoy any benefit now,
because we would invest, not consume. Any attempt to forego a positive rate
of time preference leads, according to Tjalling Koopmans, to the “paradox of
the indefinitely postponed splurge” (PIPS). Except that, as Matthew Rendall
argues convincingly in his internal critique of Koopmans’ argument, it doesn’t.
Rendall shows that the argument for the PIPS “falls apart,” establishing that
undiscounted utilitarianism is not a self-defeating theory.
But Rendall not only dismantles the argument for discounting based on
PIPS, he also offers penetrating critiques of discounting as a utilitarian
decision-making procedure. Against the argument that one ought to discount
at the market interest rate lest one make inefficient investments that leave
11
Climate Justice
future generations worse off, Rendall notes that Martin Weitzman’s defense
explicitly assumes that the real interest rate remains the same across gener-
ations. But one cannot assume that the real interest rate will remain the same
when a catastrophe caused by climate change could cause long-term growth to
stall. And because climate change depends on stocks as well as flows, one also
cannot assume that one can switch it off once catastrophe appears likely. This
inattention to possible disaster is one reason why “discounting as usually
practiced, then, does not maximize long-run expected utility.” Put positively,
Rendall’s thesis is that “it is far more important to minimize the risk of such
catastrophes than to increase consumption.” This leads him to endorse a
constraint similar to Hans Jonas’s imperative of responsibility, “which forbids
us from making ‘the existence or the essence of man as a whole . . . a stake in
the hazards of action’.”
Like Rendall, Eugen Pissarskoi argues for focusing climate policy on the
avoidance of catastrophe. In Chapter 11, “The Controllability Precautionary
Principle: Justification of a Climate Policy Goal Under Uncertainty,” he
presents challenges to the arguments of both many economists and many
philosophers. Pissarskoi puts aside the subjective probabilities regularly
employed by economists and takes seriously the fact that the objective prob-
ability for any specific value for climate sensitivity (the extent to which
climate will respond to increases in forcing by accumulated greenhouse
gases) is unknown, leaving open the possibility that climate sensitivity is
much higher than conventionally assumed. And while he is sympathetic to
the possibilistic approach using a precautionary principle invoked by a num-
ber of philosophers, he shows that their versions of the precautionary prin-
ciple fail to justify choosing to allow the atmospheric concentration of CO2 to
stabilize at as high a level as 550 ppm because, if climate sensitivity is actually
higher than usually assumed, a concentration of 550 ppm risks catastrophe
just as higher (and some lower) concentrations do.
In response Pissarskoi formulates a new precautionary principle that intro-
duces conditions on the process by which a policy allows catastrophe to be
risked. Policies that allow higher concentrations of CO2 allow the risk of
catastrophe as the result of uncontrollable natural climate responses. Policies
that drive concentrations of CO2 lower by means of negative emissions risk
catastrophe through disruption of social and economic processes that humans
may nevertheless be able to control. He suggests that the latter risks of catas-
trophe from potentially controllable social processes may be less dangerous
than the risks of catastrophe from uncontrollable natural processes.
J. Paul Kelleher uses the concept of social cost of carbon, and the associated
issue of discounting the well-being of future generations, to open up the
question of the difference between choice and valuation, the latter being
much broader than simply a discounted sum of per capita consumptions of
12
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Archery, skipping, horse exercise, croquet, the hand-swing, the fly-
pole, skating, and dancing are among the best. Archery expands the
chest, throws back the shoulders, thus improving the figure, and
develops the muscles. Skipping is exceedingly good exercise for a
girl, every part of the body being put into action by it. Horse exercise
is splendid for a girl; it improves the figure amazingly—it is most
exhilarating and amusing; moreover, it gives her courage and makes
her self-reliant. Croquet develops and improves the muscles of the
arms, beautifies the complexion, strengthens the back, and throws
out the chest. Croquet is for girls and women what cricket is for boys
and men—a glorious game. Croquet has improved both the health
and the happiness of womankind more than any game ever before
invented. Croquet, in the bright sunshine, with the winds of heaven
blowing about the players, is not like a ball in a stifling hot ball-
room, with gas-lights poisoning the air. Croquet is a more sensible
amusement than dancing; it brings the intellect as well as the
muscles into play. The man who invented croquet has deserved
greater glory, and has done more good to his species, than many
philosophers whose names are emblazoned in story. Hand-swing is a
capital exercise for a girl; the whole of the body is thrown into action
by it, and the spine, the shoulders, and the shoulder-blades are
especially benefited. The fly-pole, too, is good exercise for the whole
of the muscles of the body, especially of the legs and the arms.
Skating is as exhilarating as a glass of champagne, but will do her far
more good! Skating exhilarates the spirits, improves the figure, and
makes a girl balance and carry herself well; it is a most becoming
exercise for her, and is much in every way to be commended.
Moreover, skating gives a girl courage and self-reliance Dancing,
followed as a rational amusement, causes a free circulation of the
blood, and, provided it does not induce her to sit up late at night, is
most beneficial.
339. If dancing be so beneficial, why are balls such fruitful
sources of coughs, of colds, and consumptions?
On many accounts. They induce young ladies to sit up late at night;
they cause them to dress more lightly than they are accustomed to
do; and thus thinly clad, they leave their homes while the weather is
perhaps piercing cold, to plunge into a suffocating, hot ball-room,
made doubly injurious by the immense number of lights, which
consume the oxygen intended for the due performance of the healthy
function of the lungs. Their partners, the brilliancy of the scene, and
the music excite their nerves to undue, and thus to unnatural action,
and what is the consequence? Fatigue, weakness, hysterics, and
extreme depression follow. They leave the heated ball-room, when
the morning has far advanced, to breathe the bitterly cold and
frequently damp air of a winter’s night, and what is the result?
Hundreds die of consumption who might otherwise have lived.
Ought there not, then, to be a distinction between a ball at midnight
and a dance in the evening?
340. But still, would you have a girl brought up to forego the
pleasures of a ball?
If a parent prefer her so-called pleasures to her health, certainly
not; to such a mother I do not address myself.
341. Have you any remarks to make on singing, or on reading
aloud?
Before a mother allows her daughter to take lessons in singing, she
should ascertain that there be no actual disease of the lungs, for if
there be, it will probably excite it into action; but if no disease exist,
singing or reading aloud is very conducive to health. Public singers
are seldom known to die of consumption. Singing expands the chest,
improves the pronunciation, enriches the voice for conversation,
strengthens the lungs, and wards off many of their diseases.
EDUCATION.
342. Do you approve of corporal punishment in schools?

I do not. I consider it to be decidedly injurious both to body and
mind. Is it not painful to witness the pale cheeks and the dejected
looks of those boys who are often flogged? If their tempers are mild,
their spirits are broken; if their dispositions are at all obstinate, they
become hardened and willful, and are made little better than brutes.
[285]
A boy who is often flogged loses that noble ingenuousness and
fine sensibility so characteristic of youth. He looks upon his school as
his prison, and his master as his jailer, and, as he grows up to
manhood, hates and despises the man who has flogged him. Corporal
punishment is revolting, disgusting, and demoralizing to the boy,
and is degrading to the school-master as a man and as a Christian.
If school-masters must flog, let them flog their own sons. If they
must ruin the tempers, the dispositions, and the constitutions of
boys, they have more right to practice upon their own than on other
people’s children! Oh that parents would raise—and that without any
uncertain sound—their voices against such abominations, and the
detestable cane would soon be banished the school-room! “I am
confident that no boy,” says Addison, “who will not be allured by
letters without blows, will never be brought to anything with them. A
great or good mind must necessarily be the worse for such
indignities; and it is a sad change to lose of its virtue for the
improvement of its knowledge. No one has gone through what they
call a great school, but must have remembered to have seen children
of excellent and ingenuous natures (as have afterward appeared in
their manhood). I say, no man has passed through this way of
education but must have seen an ingenuous creature expiring with
shame, with pale looks, beseeching sorrow, and silent tears, throw up
its honest eyes, and kneel on its tender knees to an inexorable
blockhead, to be forgiven the false quantity of a word in making a
Latin verse. The child is punished, and the next day he commits a
like crime, and so a third, with the same consequence. I would fain
ask any reasonable man whether this lad, in the simplicity of his
native innocence, full of shame, and capable of any impression from
that grace of soul, was not fitter for any purpose in this life than after
that spark of virtue is extinguished in him, though he is able to write
twenty verses in an evening?”
How often is corporal punishment resorted to at school because
the master is in a passion, and he vents his rage upon the poor
school-boy’s unfortunate back!
Oh! the mistaken notion that flogging will make a bad-behaved
boy a good boy; it has the contrary effect. “‘I dunno how ’tis, sir,’ said
an old farm-laborer, in reply to a question from his clergyman
respecting the bad behavior of his children, ‘I dunno how ’tis; I beats
’em till they’re black and blue, and when they won’t kneel down to
pray I knocks ’em down, and yet they ain’t good.’”[286]
In an excellent article in Temple Bar (November, 1864) on
flogging in the army, the following sensible remarks occur: “In nearly
a quarter of a century’s experience with soldiers, the writer has
always, and without a single exception, found flogging makes a good
man bad, and a bad man worse.” With equal truth it may be said
that, without a single exception, flogging makes a good boy bad, and
a bad boy worse. How many men owe their ferocity to the canings
they received when school-boys! The early floggings hardened and
soured them, and blunted their sensibility.
Dr. Arnold of Rugby, one of the best school-masters that England
ever produced, seldom caned a boy—not more than once or twice
during the half year; but when he did cane him, he charged for the
use of the cane each time in the bill, in order that the parents might
know how many times their son had been punished. At some of our
public schools nowadays a boy is caned as many times in a morning
as the worthy doctor would have caned him during the whole half
year; but then the doctor treated the boys as gentlemen, and trusted
much to their honor; but now many school-masters trust much to
fear, little to honor, and treat them as brute beasts.
It might be said that the discipline of a school cannot be
maintained unless the boys be frequently caned—that it must be
either caning or expulsion. I deny these assertions. Dr. Arnold was
able to conduct his school with honor to himself, and with immense
benefit to the rising generation, without either frequent canings or
expulsions. The humane plan, however, requires at first both trouble
and patience; and trouble some school-masters do not like, and
patience they do not possess; the use of the cane is quick, sharp, and
at the time effective.
If caning be ever necessary, which it might occasionally be, for the
telling of lies for instance, or for gross immorality, let the head
master himself be the only one to perform the operation, but let him
not be allowed to delegate it to others. A law ought in all public
schools to be in force to that effect. High time that something was
done to abate such disgraceful practices.
Never should a school-master, or any one else, be allowed, on any
pretense whatever, to strike a boy upon his head. Boxing of the ears
has sometimes caused laceration of the drum of the ear, and
consequent partial deafness for life. Boxing of the ears injures the
brain, and therefore the intellect.
It might be said that I am traveling out of my province in making
remarks on corporal chastisement in schools. But, with deference, I
reply that I am strictly in the path of duty. My office is to inform you
of everything that is detrimental to your children’s health and
happiness; and corporal punishment is assuredly most injurious
both to their health and happiness. It is the bounden duty of every
man, and especially of every medical man, to lift up his voice against
the abominable, disgusting, and degrading system of flogging, and to
warn parents of the danger and the mischief of sending boys to those
schools where flogging is permitted.
343. Have you any observations to make on the selection of a
female boarding-school?
Home education, where it be practicable, is far preferable to
sending a girl to school; as at home, her health, her morals, and her
household duties can be attended to much more effectually than
from home. Moreover, it is a serious injury to a girl, in more ways
than one, to separate her from her own brothers; they very much lose
their affection for each other, and mutual companionship (so
delightful and beneficial between brothers and sisters) is severed.
If home education be not practicable, great care must be taken in
making choice of a school. Boarding-school education requires great
reformation. Accomplishments, superficial acquirements, and
brainwork are the order of the day; health is very little studied. You
ought, in the education of your daughters, to remember that they, in
a few years, will be the wives and the mothers of England; and if they
have not health and strength, and a proper knowledge of household
duties to sustain their characters, what useless, listless wires and
mothers they will make!
Remember, then, the body and not the mind ought in early life to
be principally cultivated and strengthened, and that the growing
brain will not bear, with impunity, much book learning. The brain of
a schoolgirl is frequently injured by getting up voluminous questions
by rote, that are not of the slightest use or benefit to her or to any one
else. Instead of this ridiculous system, educate a girl to be useful and
self-reliant. “From babyhood they are given to understand that
helplessness is feminine and beautiful; helpfulness, except in certain
received forms of manifestation, unwomanly and ugly. The boys may
do a thousand things which are ‘not proper for little girls.’”[287]
From her twelfth to her seventeenth year is the most important
epoch of a girl’s existence, as regards her future health, and
consequently, in a great measure, her future happiness; and one in
which, more than at any other period of her life, she requires a
plentiful supply of fresh air, exercise, recreation, a variety of
innocent amusements, and an abundance of good nourishment,
more especially fresh meat; if therefore you have determined on
sending your girl to school, you must ascertain that the pupils have
as much plain, wholesome, nourishing food as they can eat,[288] that
the school be situated in a healthy spot, that it be well drained, that
there be a large play-ground attached to it, that the young people are
allowed plenty of exercise in the open air—indeed, that at least one-
third of the day is spent there in croquet, skipping, archery,
battledore and shuttlecock, gardening, walking, running, etc.
Take care that the school-rooms are well ventilated, that they are
not overcrowded, and that the pupils are allowed chairs to sit upon,
and not those abominations—forms and stools. If you wish to try the
effect of them upon yourself, sit for a couple of hours without stirring
upon a form or upon a stool, and take my word for it you will insist
that forms and stools be banished forever from the school-room.
Assure yourself that the pupils are compelled to rise early in the
morning, and that they retire early to rest: that each young lady has a
separate bed,[289] and that many are not allowed to sleep in the same
room, and that the apartments are large and well ventilated. In fine,
their health and their morals ought to be preferred far above all their
accomplishments.
344. They use, in some schools, straight-backed chairs, to make a
girl sit upright and to give strength to her back: do you approve of
them?
Certainly not. The natural and the graceful curve of the back is not
the curve of a straight-backed chair. Straight-backed chairs are
instruments of torture, and are more likely to make a girl crooked
than to make her straight. Sir Astley Cooper ridiculed straight-
backed chairs, and well he might. It is always well for a mother to try,
for some considerable time, such ridiculous inventions upon herself
before she experiments upon her unfortunate daughter. The position
is most unnatural. I do not approve of a girl lounging and lolling on a
sofa; but, if she be tired and wants to rest herself, let her, like any
other reasonable being, sit upon a comfortable ordinary chair.
If you want her to be straight, let her be made strong; and if she is
to be strong, she must use plenty of exercise and exertion, such as
drilling, dancing, skipping, archery, croquet, hand-swinging, horse
exercise, swimming, bowls, etc. This is the plan to make her back
straight and her muscles strong. Why should we bring up a girl
differently from a boy? Muscular gymnastic exercises and health-
giving exertion are unladylike, forsooth!
HOUSEHOLD WORK FOR GIRLS.
345. Do you recommend household work as a means of health for

my daughter?
Decidedly. Whatever you do, do not make a fine lady of her, or she
will become puny and delicate, listless and miserable. A girl, let her
station be what it might, ought, as soon as she be old enough, to
make her own bed. There is no exercise to expand the figure and to
beautify the shape better than bed-making. Let her make tidy her
own room. Let her use her hands and her arms. Let her, to a great
extent, be self-reliant, and let her wait upon herself. There is nothing
vulgar in her being useful. Let me ask, Of what use are many girls of
the present day? They are utterly useless. Are they happy? No, for the
want of employment they are miserable—I mean, bodily
employment, household work. Many girls, nowadays, unfortunately,
are made to look upon a pretty face, dress, and accomplishments as
the only things needed! And, when they do become women and wives
—if ever they do become women and wives—what miserable,
lackadaisical wives, and what senseless, useless mothers they make!
CHOICE OF PROFESSION OR TRADE.
346. What profession or trade would you recommend a boy of a

delicate or of a consumptive habit to follow?
If a youth be delicate, it is a common practice among parents
either to put him to some light in-door trade, or, if they can afford it,
to one of the learned professions. Such a practice is absurd, and
fraught with danger The close confinement of an in-door trade is
highly prejudicial to health. The hard reading requisite to fit a man to
fill, for instance, the sacred office, only increases delicacy of
constitution. The stooping at a desk, in an attorney’s office, is most
trying to the chest. The harass, the anxiety, the disturbed nights, the
interrupted meals, and the intense study necessary to fit a man for
the medical profession, is still more dangerous to health than either
law, divinity, or any in-door trade. “Sir Walter Scott says of the
country surgeon, that he is worse fed and harder wrought than any
one else in the parish, except it be his horse.”[290]
A modern writer, speaking of the life of a medical man, observes:
“There is no career which so rapidly wears away the powers of life,
because there is no other which requires a greater activity of mind
and body. He has to bear the changes of weather, continued fatigue,
irregularity in his meals, and broken rest; to live in the midst of
miasma and contagion. If in the country, he has to traverse
considerable distances on horseback, exposed to wind and storm—to
brave all dangers to go to the relief of suffering humanity. A fearful
truth for medical men has been established by the table of mortality
by Dr. Casper, published in the British Review. Of 1000 members of
the medical profession, 600 died before their sixty-second year;
while of persons leading a quiet life—such as agriculturists or
theologians—the mortality is only 347. If we take 100 individuals of
each of these classes, 43 theologians, 40 agriculturists, 35 clerks, 32
soldiers, will reach their seventieth year: of 100 professors of the
healing art, 24 only will reach that age. They are the sign-posts to
health; they can show the road to old age, but rarely tread it
themselves.”
If a boy, therefore, be of a delicate or of a consumptive habit, an
out-door calling should be advised, such as that of a farmer, of a
tanner, or a land-surveyor; but, if he be of an inferior station of
society, the trade of a butcher may be recommended. Tanners and
butchers are seldom known to die of consumption.
I cannot refrain from reprobating the too common practice among
parents of bringing up their boys to the professions. The anxieties
and the heartaches which they undergo if they do not succeed (and
how can many of them succeed when there is such a superabundance
of candidates?) materially injure their health. “I very much wonder,”
says Addison, “at the humor of parents, who will not rather choose to
place their sons in a way of life where an honest industry cannot but
thrive, than in stations where the greatest probity, learning, and
good sense may miscarry. How many men are country curates, that
might have made themselves aldermen of London by a right
improvement of a smaller sum of money than what is usually laid out
upon a learned education? A sober, frugal person, of slender parts
and a slow apprehension, might have thrived in trade, though he
starves upon physic; as a man would be well enough pleased to buy
silks of one whom he could not venture to feel his pulse. Vagellius is
careful, studious, and obliging, but withal a little thick-skulled; he
has not a single client, but might have had abundance of customers.
The misfortune is, that parents take a liking to a particular
profession, and therefore desire their sons may be of it; whereas, in
so great an affair of life, they should consider the genius and abilities
of their children more than their own inclinations. It is the great
advantage of a trading nation, that there are very few in it so dull and
heavy who may not be placed in stations of life which may give them
an opportunity of making their fortunes. A well-regulated commerce
is not, like law, physic, or divinity, to be overstocked with hands; but,
on the contrary, flourishes by multitudes, and gives employment to
all its professors. Fleets of merchantmen are so many squadrons of
floating shops, that vend our wares and manufactures in all the
markets of the world, and find out chapmen under both the tropics.”
347. Then, do you recommend a delicate youth to be brought up
either to a profession or to a trade?
Decidedly. There is nothing so injurious for a delicate boy, or for
any one else, as idleness. Work, in moderation, enlivens the spirits,
braces the nerves, and gives tone to the muscles, and thus
strengthens the constitution. Of all miserable people, the idle boy or
the idle man is the most miserable! If you are poor, of course you will
bring him up to some calling; but if you are rich, and your boy is
delicate (if he be not actually in a consumption), you will, if you are
wise, still bring him up to some trade or profession. You will,
otherwise, be making a rod for your own as well as for your son’s
back. Oh, what a blessed thing is work!
SLEEP.
348. Have you any remarks to make on the sleep of boys and
girls?
Sleeping-rooms are, generally, the smallest in the house, whereas,
for health’s sake, they ought to be the largest. If it be impossible to
have a large bedroom, I should advise a parent to have a dozen or
twenty holes (each about the size of a florin) bored with a center-bit
in the upper part of the chamber-door, and the same number of
holes in the lower part of the door, so as constantly to admit a free
current of air from the passages. If this cannot readily be done, then
let the bedroom door be left ajar all night, a door-chain being on the
door to prevent intrusion; and, in the summer time, during the night,
let the window-sash, to the extent of about two or three inches, be
left open.
If there be a dressing-room next to the bedroom, it will be well to
have the dressing-room window, instead of the bedroom window,
open at night. The dressing-room door will regulate the quantity of
air to be admitted into the bedroom, opening it either little or much,
as the weather might be cold or otherwise.
Fresh air during sleep is indispensable to health.—If a bedroom be
close, the sleep, instead of being calm and refreshing, is broken and
disturbed; and the boy, when he awakes in the morning, feels more
fatigued than when he retired to rest.
If sleep is to be refreshing, the air, then, must be pure, and free
from carbonic acid gas, which is constantly being evolved from the
lungs. If sleep is to be health-giving, the lungs ought to have their
proper food, oxygen,—and not be cheated by giving them instead a
poison, carbonic acid gas.
It would be well for each boy to have a separate room to himself,
and each girl a separate room to herself. If two boys are obliged, from
the smallness of the house, to sleep in one room, and if two girls,
from the same cause, are compelled to occupy the same chamber, by
all means let each one have a separate bed to himself and to herself,
as it is so much more healthy and expedient for both boys and girls to
sleep alone.
The roof of the bed should be left open—that is to say, the top of
the bedstead ought not be covered with bed furniture, but should be
open to the ceiling, in order to encourage a free ventilation of air. A
bed-curtain may be allowed on the side of the bed where there are
windy currents of air; otherwise bed-curtains and valances ought on
no account to be allowed. They prevent a free circulation of the air. A
youth should sleep on a horse-hair mattress. Such mattresses greatly
improve the figure and strengthen the frame. During the daytime,
provided it does not rain, the windows must be thrown wide open,
and, directly after he has risen from bed, the clothes ought to be
thrown entirely back, in order that they may become, before the bed
be made, well ventilated and purified by the air:
“Do you wish to be healthy?—
Then keep the house sweet;
As soon as you’re up
Shake each blanket and sheet.
Leave the beds to get fresh

On the close-crowded floor;
Let the wind sweep right through—
Open window and door.
The bad air will rush out

As the good air comes in,
Just as goodness is stronger
And better than sin.
Do this, it’s soon done,

In the fresh morning air,—
It will lighten your labor
And lessen your care.
You are weary—no wonder,

There’s weight and there’s gloom
Hanging heavily round
In each overfull room.
Be sure all the trouble

Is profit and gain,
For there’s headache, and heartache,
And fever, and pain,
Hovering round, settling down

In the closeness and heat:
Let the wind sweep right through
Till the air’s fresh and sweet.
And more cheerful you’ll feel

Through the toil of the day;
More refreshed you’ll awake
When the night’s pass’d away.”[291]
Plants and flowers ought not to be allowed to remain in a chamber

at night. Experiments have proved that plants and flowers take up, in
the daytime, carbonic acid gas (the refuse of respiration), and give off
oxygen (a gas so necessary and beneficial to health), but give out in
the night season a poisonous exhalation.
Early rising cannot be too strongly insisted upon; nothing is more
conducive to health, and thus to long life. A youth is frequently
allowed to spend the early part of the morning in bed, breathing the
impure atmosphere of a bedroom, when he should be up and about,
inhaling the balmy and health-giving breezes of the morning:
“Rise with the lark, and with the lark to bed:
The breath of night’s destructive to the hue
Of ev’ry flower that blows. Go to the field,
And ask the humble daisy why it sleeps
Soon as the sun departs? Why close the eyes
Of blossoms infinite, long ere the moon
Her oriental veil puts off? Think why,
Nor let the sweetest blossom Nature boasts
Be thus exposed to night’s unkindly damp.
Well may it droop, and all its freshness lose,
Compell’d to taste the rank and pois’nous steam
Of midnight theater and morning ball.
Give to repose the solemn hour she claims;
And from the forehead of the morning steal
The sweet occasion. Oh! there is a charm
Which morning has, that gives the brow of age
A smack of youth, and makes the lip of youth
Shed perfume exquisite. Expect it not,
Ye who till noon upon a down-bed lie,
Indulging feverish sleep.”[292]
If early rising be commenced in childhood it becomes a habit, and

will then probably be continued through life. A boy ought on no
account to be roused from his sleep; but as soon as he be awake in
the morning, he should be encouraged to rise. Dozing—that state
between sleeping and waking—is injurious; it enervates both body
and mind, and is as detrimental to health as dram-drinking! But if he
rise early, he must go to bed betimes; it is a bad practice to keep him
up until the family retire to rest. He ought, winter and summer, to
seek his pillow by nine o’clock, and should rise as soon as he awakes
in the morning.
Let me urge upon a parent the great importance of not allowing
the chimney of any bedroom, or of any room in the house, to be
stopped, as many are in the habit of doing, to prevent, as they call it,
a draught, but to prevent, as I should call it, health.
349. How many hours of sleep ought a boy to have?
This, of course, will depend upon the exercise he takes; but, on an
average, he should have every night at least eight hours. It is a
mistaken notion that a boy does better with little sleep. Infants,
children, and youths require more than those who are further
advanced in years; hence old people can frequently do with little
sleep. This may in a measure be accounted for from the quantity of
exercise the young take. Another reason may be, the young have
neither pain nor care to keep them awake; while, on the contrary, the
old have frequently one or both:
“Care keeps his watch on every old man’s eye,
And where care lodges, sleep will never lie.”[293]
ON THE TEETH AND THE GUMS.
350. What are the best means of keeping the teeth and the gums
in a healthy state?
I would recommend the teeth and the gums to be well brushed
with warm salt and water, in the proportion of one large teaspoonful
of salt to a tumbler of water. I was induced to try the above plan by
the recommendation of an intelligent American writer.[294]
The salt and water should be used every night at bedtime.
The following is an excellent tooth-powder:
Take of finely-powdered Peruvian Bark;
„ Prepared Coral;
„ Prepared Chalk;
„ Myrrh, of each half an ounce;
„ Orris root, a quarter of an ounce:
Mix them well together in a mortar, and preserve the powder in a wide-mouth
stoppered bottle.
The teeth ought to be well brushed with the above tooth-powder
every morning.
If the teeth be much decayed, and if, in consequence, the breath be
offensive, two ounces of finely-powdered charcoal, well mixed with
the above ingredients, will be found a valuable addition.
Some persons clean their teeth every morning with soap; if soap be
used it ought to be Castile soap, and if the teeth be not white and
clear, Castile soap is an excellent cleanser of the teeth, and may be
used in lieu of the tooth-powder as before recommended.
There are few persons who brush the teeth properly. I will tell you
the right way. First of all procure a tooth-brush of the best make, and
of rather hard bristles, to enable it to penetrate into all the nooks and
corners of the teeth; then, having put a small quantity of warm water
into your mouth, letting the principal of it escape into the basin, dip
your brush in warm water, and if you are about using Castile soap,
rub the brush on a cake of the soap, and then well brush your teeth,
first upward and then downward, then from side to side—from right
to left and from left to right—then the backs of the teeth, then apply
the brush to the tops of the crowns of the teeth both of the upper and
of the lower jaw,—so that every part of each tooth, including the
gums, may in turn be well cleansed, and be well brushed. Be not
afraid of using the brush: a good brushing and dressing will do the
teeth and the gums an immensity of good; it will make the breath
sweet, and will preserve the teeth sound and good. After using the
brush the mouth must, of course, be well rinsed out with warm
water.
The finest set of teeth I ever saw in my life belonged to a middle-
aged gentleman; the teeth had neither spot nor blemish—they were
like beautiful pearls. He never had toothache in his life, and did not
know what toothache meant! He brushed his teeth, every morning,
with soap and water, in the manner I have previously recommended.
I can only say to you—go and do likewise!
Camphor ought never to be used as an ingredient of tooth-powder,
it makes the teeth brittle. Camphor certainly has the effect of making
the teeth, for a time, look very white; but it is an evanescent beauty.
Tartar is apt to accumulate between and around the teeth; it is
better in such a case not to remove it by scaling instruments, but to
adopt the plan recommended by Dr. Richardson, namely, to well
brush the teeth with pure vinegar and water.
PREVENTION OF DISEASE, Etc.
351. If a boy or a girl show great precocity of intellect, is any

organ likely to become affected?
A greater quantity of arterial blood is sent to the brain of those
who are prematurely talented, and hence it becomes more than
ordinarily developed. Such advantages are not unmixed with danger;
this same arterial blood may excite and feed inflammation, and
either convulsions, or water on the brain, or insanity, or, at last,
idiocy may follow. How proud a mother is in having a precocious
child! How little is she aware that precocity is frequently an
indication of disease!
352. How can danger in such a case be warded off?
It behooves a parent, if her son be precocious, to restrain him—to
send him to a quiet country place, free from the excitement of the
town; and when he is sent to school, to give directions to the master
that he is not on any account to tax his intellect (for a master is apt, if
he have a clever boy, to urge him forward); and to keep him from
those institutions where a spirit of rivalry is maintained, and where
the brain is thus kept in a state of constant excitement. Medals and
prizes are well enough for those who have moderate abilities, but
dangerous, indeed, to those who have brilliant ones.
An overworked precocious brain is apt to cause the death of the
owner; and if it does not do so, it in too many instances injures the
brain irreparably, and the possessor of such an organ, from being
one of the most intellectual of children, becomes one of the most
commonplace of men.
Let me urge you, if you have a precocious child, to give, and that
before it be too late, the subject in question your best consideration.
353. Are precocious boys in their general health usually strong or
delicate?
Delicate. Nature seems to have given a delicate body to
compensate for the advantages of a talented mind. A precocious
youth is predisposed to consumption, more so than to any other
disease. The hard study which he frequently undergoes excites the
disease into action. It is not desirable, therefore, to have a precocious
child. A writer in “Fraser’s Magazine” speaks very much to the
purpose when he says, “Give us intellectual beef rather than
intellectual veal.”
354. What habit of body is most predisposed to Scrofula?
He or she who has a moist, cold, fair, delicate, and almost
transparent skin, large prominent blue eyes, protuberant forehead,
light-brown or auburn hair, rosy cheeks, pouting lips, milk-white
teeth, long neck, high shoulders, small, flat, and contracted chest,
tumid bowels, large joints, thin limbs, and flabby muscles, is the
person most predisposed to scrofula. The disease is not entirely
confined to the above; sometimes he or she who has black hair, dark
eyes and complexion, is subject to it, but yet far less frequently than
the former. It is a remarkable fact that the most talented are the most
prone to scrofula, and being thus clever their intellects are too often
cultivated at the expense of their health. In infancy and childhood,
either water on the brain or mesenteric disease; in youth, pulmonary
consumption is frequently their doom. They, are like shining
meteors; their life is brilliant, but short.
355. How may Scrofula be warded off?
Strict attention to the rules of health is the means to prevent
scrofula. Books, unless as an amusement, ought to be discarded. The
patient must almost live in the open air, and his residence should be
a healthy country place, where the air is dry and bracing; if it be at a
farm-house, in a salubrious neighborhood, so much the better. In
selecting a house for a patient predisposed to scrofula, good pure
water should be an important requisite—indeed for every one who
values his health. Early rising in such a case is most beneficial. Wine,
spirits, and all fermented liquors ought to be avoided. Beef-steaks
and mutton-chops in abundance, and plenty of milk and farinaceous
food—such as rice, sago, arrow-root, etc.—should be his diet.
Scrofula, if the above rules be strictly and perseveringly followed,
may be warded off; but there must be no half measures, no trying to
serve two masters—to cultivate at the same time the health and the
intellect. The brain, until the body becomes strong, must not be
taxed. “You may prevent scrofula by care; but that some children are
originally predisposed to the disease there cannot be the least doubt,
and in such cases the education and the habits of youth should be so
directed as to ward off a complaint the effects of which are so
frequently fatal.”[295]
356. But suppose the disease to be already formed, what must
then be done?
The plan recommended above must still be pursued, not by fits
and starts, but steadily and continuously, for it is a complaint that
requires a vast deal of patience and great perseverance. Warm and
cold sea-bathing in such a case is generally most beneficial. In a
patient with confirmed scrofula it will of course be necessary to
consult a skillful and experienced doctor.
But do not allow, without a second opinion, any plan to be adopted
that will weaken the system, which is already too much depressed.
No, rather build up the body by good nourishing diet (as previously
recommended), by cod-liver oil, by a dry, bracing atmosphere, such
as either Brighton, or Ramsgate, Llandudno; or, if the lungs be
delicate, by a more sheltered coast, such as either St. Leonard’s or
Torquay.
Let no active purging, no mercurials, no violent, desperate
remedies be allowed. If the patient cannot be cured without them, I
am positive that he will not be cured with them.
But do not despair; many scrofulous patients are cured by time
and by judicious treatment. But if desperate remedies are to be used,
the poor patient had better by far be left to Nature. “Let me fall now
into the hand of the Lord; for very great are his mercies: but let me
not fall into the hand of man.”[296]
357. Have you any remarks to make on a girl stooping?
A girl ought never to be allowed to stoop: stooping spoils the
figure, weakens the chest, and interferes with the digestion. If she
cannot help stooping, you may depend upon it that she is in bad
health, and that a medical man ought to be consulted. As soon as her
health is improved the dancing-master should be put in requisition,
and calisthenic and gymnastic exercises should be resorted to. Horse
exercise and swimming in such a case are very beneficial. The girl
should live well, on good nourishing diet, and not be too closely
confined either to the house or to her lessons. She ought during the
night to lie on a horse-hair mattress, and during the day, for two or
three hours, flat on her back on a reclining board. Stooping, if
neglected, is very likely to lead to consumption.
358. If a boy be round-shouldered and slouching in his gait, what
ought to be done?
Let him be drilled; there is nothing more likely to benefit him than
drilling. You never see a soldier round-shouldered nor slouching in
his gait. He walks every inch like a man. Look at the difference in
appearance between a country laborer and a soldier! It is the drilling
that makes the difference. “Oh, for a drill-sergeant to teach them to
stand upright, and to turn out their toes, and to get rid of that
slouching, hulking gait, which gives such a look of clumsiness and
stupidity!”[297]
359. My daughter has grown out of shape, she has grown on one
side, her spine is not straight, and her ribs bulge out more on the
one side than on the other: what is the cause, and can anything be
done to remedy the deformity?
The causes of this lateral curvature of the spine, and consequent
bulging out of the ribs that you have just now described, arise either
from delicacy of constitution, from the want of proper exercise, from
too much learning, or from too little play, or from not sufficient or
proper nourishment for a rapidly-growing body. I am happy to say
that such a case, by judicious treatment, can generally be cured—
namely, by gymnastic exercises, such as the hand-swing, the fly-pole,
the patent parlor gymnasium, the chest expander, the skipping-rope,
the swimming bath; all sorts of out-door games, such as croquet,
archery, etc.; by plenty of good nourishment, by making her a child
of Nature, by letting her almost live in the open air, and by throwing
books to the winds. But let me strongly urge you not, unless ordered
by an experienced surgeon, to allow any mechanical restraints or
appliances to be used. If she be made strong, the muscles themselves
will pull both the spine and the ribs into their proper places, more
especially if judicious games and exercises (as I have before advised),
and other treatment of a strengthening and bracing nature, which a
medical man will indicate to you, be enjoined. Mechanical appliances
will, if not judiciously applied, and in a proper case, waste away the
muscles, and will thus increase the mischief; if they cause the ribs to
be pushed in in one place, they will bulge them out in another, until,
instead of being one, there will be a series of deformities. No, the
giving of strength and the judicious exercising of the muscles are, for
a lateral curvature of the spine and the consequent bulging out of one
side of the ribs, the proper remedies, and, in the majority of cases,
are most effectual, and quite sufficient for the purpose.
I think it well to strongly impress upon a mother’s mind the great
importance of early treatment. If the above advice be followed, every
curvature in the beginning might be cured. Cases of several years’
standing might, with judicious treatment, be wonderfully relieved.
Bear in mind, then, that if the girl is to be made straight, she is
first of all to be made strong; the latter, together with the proper
exercises of the muscles, will lead to the former; and the earlier a
medical man takes it in hand, the more rapid, the more certain, and
the more effectual will be the cure.
An inveterate, long-continued and neglected case of curvature of
the spine and bulging out of the ribs on one side might require
mechanical appliances, but such a case can only be decided on by an
experienced surgeon, who ought always, in the first place, to be
consulted.
360. Is a slight spitting of blood to be looked upon as a dangerous
symptom?
Spitting of blood is always to be looked upon with suspicion, even
when a youth appears in other respects to be in good health; it is
frequently the forerunner of consumption. It might be said that, by
mentioning the fact, I am unnecessarily alarming a parent, but it
would be a false kindness if I did not do so:
“I must be cruel only to be kind.”[298]
Let me ask when is consumption to be cured? Is it at the onset, or is
it when it is confirmed? If a mother had been more generally aware
that spitting of blood was frequently the forerunner of consumption,
she would, in the management of her offspring, have taken greater
precautions; she would have made everything give way to the
preservation of their health; and, in many instances, she would have
been amply repaid by having the lives of her children spared to her.
We frequently hear of patients in confirmed consumption being sent
to Mentone, to Madeira, and to other foreign parts. Can anything be
more cruel or absurd? If there be any disease that requires the
comforts of home—and truly may an Englishman’s dwelling be called
home!—and good nursing more than another, it is consumption.
361. What is the death-rate of Consumption in England? At what
age does Consumption most frequently occur? Are girls more liable
to it than boys? What are the symptoms of this disease?
It is asserted, on good authority,[299] that there always are, in
England, 78,000 cases of consumption, and that the yearly death-
rate of this fell disease alone is 39,000! Consumption more
frequently shows itself between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one;
after then, the liability to the disease gradually diminishes, until at
the age of forty-five it becomes comparatively rare. Boys are more
prone to this complaint than girls. Some of the most important
symptoms of pulmonary consumption are indicated by the
stethoscope; but, as I am addressing a mother, it would, of course, be
quite out of place to treat of such signs in Conversations of this kind.
The symptoms it might be well for a parent to recognize, in order
that she may seek aid early, I will presently describe. It is perfectly
hopeless to expect to cure consumption unless advice be sought at
the onset, as the only effectual good in this disease is to be done at
first.
It might be well to state that consumption creeps on insidiously.
One of the earliest symptoms of this dreadful scourge is a slight, dry,
short cough, attended with tickling and irritation at the top of the
throat. This cough generally occurs in the morning; but, after some
time, comes on at night, and gradually throughout the day and the
night. Frequently during the early stage of the disease a slight
spitting of blood occurs. Now this is a most dangerous symptom;

PDF Climate Justice Integrating Economics and Philosophy Ravi Kanbur Ebook Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PDF Climate Justice Integrating Economics and Philosophy Ravi Kanbur Ebook Full Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics

and Philosophy Ravi Kanbur

Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering, Fourth

Conservation: Integrating Social and Ecological Justice

Climate Justice and Human Rights 1st Edition Tracey

Iran’s Struggles for Social Justice: Economics, Agency,

Climate Technology, Gender, and Justice: The Standpoint

Discourses on Sustainability: Climate Change, Clean

Climate justice in a non-ideal world First Edition

Implementing Climate Change Adaptation in Cities and

List of Figures vii

1. Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy 1

2. Poor People on the Front Line: The Impacts of Climate Change

3. Governing the Commons to Promote Global Justice: Climate

4. Equity Implications of the COP21 Intended Nationally

5. Climate Change and Inequity: How to Think about Inequities

6. Climate Change and Economic Self-Interest 113

7. Noncompliers’ Duties 123

8. Divest–Invest: A Moral Case for Fossil Fuel Divestment 139

9. Justice and Posterity 157

10. Discounting and the Paradox of the Indeﬁnitely

11. The Controllability Precautionary Principle: Justiﬁcation

12. The Social Cost of Carbon from Theory to Trump 209

13. Long-Term Climate Justice 230

Appendix: Declaration on Climate Justice 247

2.1. Impact of climate change on extreme poverty 35

Climate Change Mitigation substantially, which has been considered a landmark

Economic Theory, and Economic Journal. He is President of the Human Development

Climate at the University of Leeds. He takes an interdisciplinary research approach to

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics

facilitated by the Mary Robinson Foundation. Together, they signed the

1.2. Overlapping Perspectives

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy

evaluate the normative implications of alternative policy paths. Of course

philosophers. However, the assumptions of the economists are “neoclassical,”

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy

1.3. The Volume Chapters

of this model, two scenarios, “prosperity” and “poverty,” are compared to

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy

The economist authors of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 build speciﬁc models to

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy

The consequentialist moral case is grounded both in promotional duties to act on

Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy

normative discussion. Even when, for example in Chapter 2 or Chapter 3,

342. Do you approve of corporal punishment in schools?

HOUSEHOLD WORK FOR GIRLS.

345. Do you recommend household work as a means of health for

CHOICE OF PROFESSION OR TRADE.

346. What profession or trade would you recommend a boy of a

Leave the beds to get fresh

The bad air will rush out

Do this, it’s soon done,

You are weary—no wonder,

Be sure all the trouble

Hovering round, settling down

And more cheerful you’ll feel

Plants and flowers ought not to be allowed to remain in a chamber

If early rising be commenced in childhood it becomes a habit, and

ON THE TEETH AND THE GUMS.

PREVENTION OF DISEASE, Etc.

351. If a boy or a girl show great precocity of intellect, is any

You might also like