Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Complex Semisimple Quantum Groups and Representation Theory 1St Edition Christian Voigt Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Complex Semisimple Quantum Groups and Representation Theory 1St Edition Christian Voigt Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/representation-theory-of-finite-
groups-a-guidebook-1st-edition-david-a-craven/
https://textbookfull.com/product/representation-theory-of-finite-
groups-a-guidebook-1st-edition-david-a-craven-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-theory-groups-and-
representations-an-introduction-1st-edition-peter-woit-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-philosophical-approach-to-
quantum-field-theory-1st-edition-hans-christian-ottinger/
A Journey Through Representation Theory From Finite
Groups to Quivers via Algebras Caroline Gruson
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-journey-through-
representation-theory-from-finite-groups-to-quivers-via-algebras-
caroline-gruson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/control-of-magnetotransport-in-
quantum-billiards-theory-computation-and-applications-1st-
edition-christian-v-morfonios/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bats-in-the-anthropocene-
conservation-of-bats-in-a-changing-world-1st-edition-christian-c-
voigt/
https://textbookfull.com/product/theory-of-groups-and-symmetries-
finite-groups-lie-groups-and-lie-algebras-1st-edition-alexey-p-
isaev/
https://textbookfull.com/product/elliptic-quantum-groups-
representations-and-related-geometry-hitoshi-konno/
Volume 2264
Editors-in-Chief
Jean-Michel Morel
CMLA, ENS, Cachan, France
Bernard Teissier
IMJ-PRG, Paris, France
Series Editors
Karin Baur
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Michel Brion
UGA, Grenoble, France
Camillo De Lellis
IAS, Princeton, NJ, USA
Alessio Figalli
ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Annette Huber
Albert Ludwig University, Freiburg, Germany
Davar Khoshnevisan
The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Ioannis Kontoyiannis
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Angela Kunoth
University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Ariane Mézard
IMJ-PRG, Paris, France
Mark Podolskij
University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Sylvia Serfaty
NYU Courant, New York, NY, USA
Gabriele Vezzosi
UniFI, Florence, Italy
Anna Wienhard
Ruprecht Karl University, Heidelberg, Germany
Robert Yuncken
Laboratoire de Mathématiques Blaise Pascal, Université Clermont
Auvergne, Aubière Cedex, France
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively
licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is
concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in
any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the
advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate
at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the
editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the
material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
3.14.3 Noetherianity of
3.14.4 Noetherianity of
5.1.2 Duality
5.1.3 Dominant and Antidominant Weights
5.2 Submodules of Verma Modules
5.3 The Shapovalov Determinant
5.4 Jantzen Filtration and the BGG Theorem
5.5 The PRV Determinant
5.5.1 The Spaces FHom(M, N)
5.5.2 Conditions for FHom(M, N) = 0
5.5.3 Multiplicities in FHom(M, N)
5.5.4 Hilbert-Poincaré Series for the Locally Finite Part of
6.1.1 Characters of
6.2 Representations of G q
6.2.1 Harish-Chandra Modules
6.2.2 Unitary G q-Representations
6.3 Action of on K q-Types
1. Introduction
Christian Voigt1 and Robert Yuncken2
(1) School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow,
UK
(2) Laboratoire de Mathématiques Blaise Pascal, Université Clermont
Auvergne, Aubière Cedex, France
References
15. K.A. Brown, K.R. Goodearl, Lectures on Algebraic Quantum Groups, in Advanced
Courses in Mathematics. CRM Barcelona (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2002)
17.
V. Chari, A. Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1995). Corrected reprint of the 1994 original.
25.
V.G. Drinfeld, Quantum groups, in Proceedings of the International Congress of
Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Berkeley, Calif., 1986) (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,
1987), pp. 798–820
34.
J.E. Humphreys, Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, vol. 9 of
Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1978). Second printing,
revised
36.
J.E. Humphreys, Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras in the BGG Category O,
vol. 94 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society,
Providence, RI, 2008)
38.
J.C. Jantzen, Lectures on Quantum Groups, vol. 6 of Graduate Studies in
Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996)
40.
A. Joseph, Quantum Groups and Their Primitive Ideals, vol. 29 of Ergebnisse der
Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas
(3)] (Springer, Berlin, 1995)
47.
A. Klimyk, K. Schmü dgen, Quantum Groups and Their Representations. Texts and
Monographs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1997)
50.
J. Kustermans, A. van Daele, C ∗-algebraic quantum groups arising from algebraic
quantum groups. Int. J. Math. 8(8), 1067–1139 (1997)
[MathSciNet][zbMATH]
53.
J. Kustermans, S. Vaes, Locally compact quantum groups. Ann. Sci. É cole Norm.
Sup. (4) 33(6), 837–934 (2000)
56.
G. Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups. Modern Birkhäuser Classics
(Birkhäuser/Springer, New York, 2010). Reprint of the 1994 edition
62.
P. Podleś, S.L. Woronowicz, Quantum deformation of Lorentz group. Commun.
Math. Phys. 130(2), 381–431 (1990)
[MathSciNet][zbMATH]
63.
W. Pusz, S.L. Woronowicz, Unitary representations of quantum Lorentz group, in
Noncompact Lie Groups and Some of Their Applications (San Antonio, TX, 1993),
vol. 429 of NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. (Kluwer Acad. Publ.,
Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 453–472
65.
W. Pusz, Irreducible unitary representations of quantum Lorentz group.
Commun. Math. Phys. 152(3), 591–626 (1993)
[MathSciNet][zbMATH]
68.
M.A. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskiı̆, Poisson-Lie groups. The quantum duality principle
and the twisted quantum double. Teor. Mat. Fiz. 93(2), 302–329 (1992).
Translation in Theor. Math. Phys. 93(2), 1292–1307 (1992; 1993)
73.
A. Van Daele, Multiplier Hopf algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 342(2), 917–932
(1994)
[MathSciNet][zbMATH]
74.
A. Van Daele, An algebraic framework for group duality. Adv. Math. 140(2), 323–
366 (1998)
[MathSciNet][zbMATH]
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2020
C. Voigt, R. Yuncken, Complex Semisimple Quantum Groups and Representation Theory,
Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2264
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52463-0_2
is commutative.
We shall use the Sweedler notation
when performing computations in coalgebras, where we are
suppressing a summation on the right-hand side. For instance, the
counit axiom reads 𝜖(c (1))c (2) = c = c (1)𝜖(c (2)) in this notation.
In analogy to the case of algebras, a (counital) coalgebra
homomorphism between (counital) coalgebras C and D is a linear map
φ : C → D such that (φ ⊗ φ) ΔC = ΔDφ (and 𝜖 Dφ = 𝜖 C in the counital
case).
If C is a (counital) coalgebra then the linear dual space
is a (unital) algebra with multiplication
(and unit element 𝜖 C). Here (, ) denotes the canonical pairing between
C and C ∗.
Conversely, if A is a finite dimensional (unital) algebra, then the
linear dual space A ∗ becomes a (counital) coalgebra using the
transpose m ∗ : A ∗→ (A ⊗ A)∗≅A ∗⊗ A ∗ of the multiplication map m : A
⊗ A → A (and counit 𝜖(f) = f(1)). We point out that if A is infinite
dimensional this will typically break down since then (A ⊗ A)∗≠ A ∗⊗ A
∗
.
However, at least in the finite dimensional situation, we have a
complete duality between algebras and coalgebras. This can be used to
transport concepts from algebras to coalgebras and vice versa. For
instance, a coalgebra C is called cosimple if it does not admit any proper
subcoalgebras. Here a subcoalgebra of C is a linear subspace D ⊂ C such
that Δ(D) ⊂ D ⊗ D. This notion corresponds to simplicity for the dual
algebra A. A coalgebra is called cosemisimple if it is a direct sum of its
simple subcoalgebras.
A basic example of a cosimple coalgebra is the dual coalgebra
of the algebra of n × n-matrices over . Explicitly, the
coproduct of C is given by
for 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, where the elements u ij ∈ C are dual to the basis of
standard matrix units for . All cosemisimple coalgebras we will
encounter later on are direct sums of such cosimple matrix coalgebras.
A Hopf algebra structure is the combination of the structures of a
unital algebra and a counital coalgebra as follows.
are commutative.
that
for all and f, g ∈ H. Here (, ) denotes the canonical pairing