Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Action Research 1
Action Research 1
DESSAREE D. FROGOSA
RYCAMAE RYSM F. FRUELDA
JHON VINCENT T. GALIVO
CRISTINE F. GARA
KIM CHRISIANNE P. ISUGA
RENALYN P. MALIGO
2024
i
ABSTRACT
This study explores a playful method, "Counting Losses," to enhance subtraction skills
with regrouping in Grade 4 students at Poctoy - Baito Elementary School. The
intervention aims to make learning enjoyable by incorporating play money into
subtraction lessons, fostering a positive attitude towards math challenges.
Using pre- and post-assessments, classroom observations, and student feedback, the
research assesses the impact of the play money intervention on students' subtraction
skills. The findings aim to provide insights into effective teaching strategies for
elementary mathematics education.
ii
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The researchers aim to address the difficulties in subtraction with regrouping among the
grade 4 pupils of Poctoy - Baito Elementary School. Specifically, they will seek answers
to the following research questions:
1. What are the pretest and posttest mean scores of the grade four pupils exposed
counting losses intervention based on the activity assessment?
2. Is there any significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean scores in the
assessment activity sheet of the class exposed to counting losses intervention?
iii
SCOPE AND LIMITATION
This action research involved twenty (20) grade 4 pupils in Poctoy – Baito
Elementary School for the 3rd Quarter of School Year 2023 – 2024. The significant
difference between the results of the pretest and posttest were tested. The significant
difference in the attitude, accuracy, and enjoyment with subtraction with regrouping
activities before and after the implementation were also tested. Data gathering was done
iv
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The research design used in this action research is pre-test - post-test quasi
experimental. In this design, the researchers compared the mean scores of pre-test and
the mean scores of the post-test results of the participants before and after the
Sampling
This action research involved twenty (20) grade 4 pupils from Poctoy-Baito
Instrumentation
Permits to conduct this experimental study will be sought from the school heads
10-item quiz activity sheet as they taught without implementing play money
intervention, and using the same 10-item quiz activity sheet as a post-test, as they taught
with the implementation of play money intervention. The data for the analysis and
interpretation will be collected before and after the intervention among the pupils of the
v
Data Collection
For collecting data, researchers used 10-item quiz activity sheet for both pre-test
Data Analysis
The data collected was analyzed using statistical tool. The researchers used pre-
Ethical Considerations
teachers and students will be asked for their free, prior, and informed consent. Respect
for the rights and autonomy will be taken into account. The researchers are aware of
their responsibility not to harm them. Before, during, and after the study, complete
anonymity and confidentiality will be maintained. It means that their names will be kept
anonymous, and the information gathered will be kept confidential and used solely for
research purposes.
vi
Innovation, Intervention, Strategy
Counting losses using play money is an intervention that seeks to improve pupil’s
skills in subtraction with regrouping. The researchers identify the learners with
knowledge about subtraction with regrouping by giving them pre-test examination consist
of 10 items. The researchers are giving different equations every day and the students will
vii
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1. What are the pretest and posttest mean scores of the grade four pupils exposed to
The table indicates that for the grade 4 pupils exposed to the counting losses
intervention, their mean score on the pretest was 4.8500, while their mean score on the
posttest after the intervention was 8.4000. The higher posttest mean score of 8.4000
compared to the pretest mean of 4.8500 suggests that the counting losses intervention had
a positive effect, leading to an increase in the mean scores of the pupils from pretest to
2. Is there any significant difference between the pretest and posttest mean scores in the
viii
The mean difference between the pretest and posttest scores is -3.5500. The
negative value indicates the posttest scores were higher than the pretest scores on
average. The t-statistic is -7.102 with 19 degrees of freedom. The Sig. (2-tailed) p-value
is 0.000. Since the p-value (0.000) is less than the conventional 0.05 significance level,
we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the pretest and
posttest mean scores. In other words, the data provides strong evidence that the counting
losses intervention had a significant positive effect on improving the scores from pretest
to posttest on the assessment activity sheet for this class of grade 4 pupils. The 95%
confidence interval for the mean difference also shows the plausible range of values,
from -4.59624 to -2.50376, which does not contain zero, further confirming the
FINDINGS
1. The mean score on the pretest of grade 4 pupils exposed to the counting losses
intervention was 4.8500 and the posttest was 8.4000. The mean difference
3. The Sig. (2-tailed) p-value is 0.000. Since the p-value (0.000) is less than the
ix
4. The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference also shows the plausible
range of values, from -4.59624 to -2.50376, which does not contain zero, further
x
CONCLUSION
Based on the findings, the intervention was effective based on the analysis result
in the table. The higher post-test mean score compared to the pre-test mean score
RECCOMENDATIONS
Although the intervention was effective we will still recommend the following:
3. More educational games that can challenge their skills in solving subtraction with
regrouping.
4. Let them practice solving subtraction with regrouping by using it in real life
situations.
xi
Conceptual Framework
In the figure below presented the variable included in the study .Independent
variable as the “Play Money Intervention” and the dependent variable as “ Subtraction
being implemented and the desire outcomes in terms of assessing the impact of the
be the focus of this action research in order to enhance the subtraction with regrouping
xii
Theoretical Framework
xiii
WORK PLAN
xiv
ACTIVITY February February February February February April
2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024
Preparation of x
the intervention
material
Compliance to x
the permits
needed to
conduct the
study, parents’
consent etc.
Pre-test x
Implementation x
of intervention
Post-test x
Data Analysis x
and
Interpretation
Report Writing x
xv