Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

07/05/2023

Capital
Capital
Budgeting
Budgeting Decisions

Capital Budgeting Broad Categories of Capital Budgeting Decisions

1. Independent capital investment projects or screening decision.


Used to describe actions relating to the planning Projects which are evaluated individually and reviewed against
and financing capital outlays for the purposes of: predetermined coporate standards of accetability resulting in an “accept” or
“reject” decision.
• purchase of new machinery
Examples:
• Modernization of plant facilities
◎ Investment in long-term assets such as PPEs
• Introduction of new product lines ◎ New product development
◎ Undertaking a large scale advertising campaign
 An investment concept ◎ Introduction of a computer

1
07/05/2023

Broad Categories of Capital Budgeting Decisions Evaluating Capital Investment Proposals


2. Mutually exclusive capital investment projects or Preference decisions The elements or factors to be considered in evaluating capital
investment proposals are:
Projects which require the company to choose from among specific
Examples:
alternatives. The project to be acceptable must pass the criteria of
 The net amount of investment
acceptability set by the company and be better than the other investment
 The operating cash flows or returns from the investment
alternatives.
 The minimum acceptable rate of return on the investment
Examples:
◎ Replacement against renovation of equipment or facilities.
◎ Rent or lease against ownership of facilities.
◎ Manual bookkeeping system against computerized system.
◎ Preventive maintenance against periodic overhaul of machineries

5 6

Net Investment Net Investment


Net investment represent the initial cash outflow that is required to obtain
future returns or the net cash outflow to support a capital investment
project. This may be computed as follows: Purchase price of new asset
Initial cash outlay xxx + Installation and transportation costs
Add: Additional cash outlay related to the asset xxx + Additional net working capital
Additional working capital xxx xxx - Proceeds from sale of old asset
Total xxx +/- Tax effects on disposal of old assets and/or the purchase of new one
Less: Cash inflow asiring form the sale of assets Net Investment
being replaced xxx
Avoidable costs xxx xxx
Net investment xxx

7 8

2
07/05/2023

Net Cash Returns Acceptable Rate of Return


Net operating cash flows or returns are the incremental changes in cash The minimum or lowest acceptable rate of return or opportunity cost may
arising from the cash inflows minus the outflows directly attributed to the equal the average rate of return that the company will earn from
project. Operating cash flows are generally assumed to occur at the end alternative investment opportunities or the cost of capital which is the
of a given year. This is computed as: average rate of return that the firm must pay to attract investment fund.

Annual incremental revenue from the project xxx


Less: Incremental cash operating costs xxx
Annual cash inflow before taxes xxx
Less: Taxes
[tax rate (Annual cash inflow before taxes
- Incremental Depreciation)] xxx
Annual net cash inflow after taxes xxx
9 10

Methods in Evaluating and Screening Alternative


Investment Proposal
The commonly used Capital Budgeting Techniques include the following:
A. Non-discounted cash flow (unadjusted) approach

Project
1. Payback period
2. Bail-out period
3. Accounting rate of return (book value rate of return)

Screening
4. Payback reciprocal
B. Discounted cash flow (time-adjusted) approach
1. Net present value
2. Discounted rate of return or internal rate of return
3. Profitability index
4. Discounted payback period
12

3
07/05/2023

Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
1. Payback Period Decision Rule:
The length of time required for a project’s cumulative net cash inflows to The desirability of the project is determined by comparing the project’s
equal its net investment. It measures the time required for a project to payback period against the maximum acceptable payback period as
breakeven. This is computed as: predetermined by management. The project with shorter payback period
a. If the annual cash inflows are uniform: than the maximum will be acceptable. Thus:
Payback Period =
If: PB period ≤ Maximum allowed PB period; ACCEPT
If: PB period > Maximum allowed PB period; REJECT
b. If cash inflows are unequal:
Unrecovered cost at the
# of years
Payback start of the year
= prior to full + x 1 year
Period Total Cash flows during
recovery
the last year of recovery
13 14

Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
2. Bail-out Period 3. Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) or Simple Rate of Return
In conventional payback computations, investment salvage value is Also known as the book value rate of return, measures profitability from
usually ignored. An approach which incorporates the salvage value in the conventional accounting standpoint by relating the required
payback computations is the Bail-out period. This is reached when the investment to the future annual net income. This is computed as:
cumulative cash earnings plus the salvage value at the end of a
particular year equals the original investment. ARR =

Or, if a cost reduction project is involved, the formula becomes:

ARR =

15 16

4
07/05/2023

Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
Decision Rule: 4. Payback Reciprocal
Under the ARR method, choose the project with the highest rate of Measures the rate of recovery of investment during the payback period.
return. Accept the project if the ARR is greater than the cost of capital. For projects with even cash flows, the payback reciprocal is computed
Thus: as:

If: ARR ≥ Required rate of return; ACCEPT Payback Reciprocal =


If: ARR < Required rate of return; REJECT
The higher the payback period reciprocal, (and, hence, the lower the
payback period) the more worthwhile the project becomes.

17 18

Discounted Cash Flow (Time-Adjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
1. Net Present Value (NPV) Decision Rule:
The excess of the PV of cash inflows generated by the project over the For independent project proposal, accept it if the NPV is positive or zero
amount of the initial investment. This is computed as: and reject if the NPV is negative. If the NPV is positive, it means that the
project will earn a return greater than the discount rate also known as
the hurdle rate. If the projects do not meet the hurdle rate, they should
Present value of cash inflows computed based
be rejected because the funds that would be invested in them can earn a
on minimum desired discount rate xxx
higher rate in some other investment. Thus:
Less: Present Value of investment xxx
Net Present Value xxx
If: NPV ≥ 0; ACCEPT
If: NPV < 0; REJECT

19 20

5
07/05/2023

Discounted Cash Flow (Time-Adjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
2. Discounted Rate of Return/ Internal Rate of Return Decision Rule:
Also known as the Time-Adjusted Rate of Return. The rate which Accept the proposed investment if the DCR or IRR is equal or greater
equates the PV of the future cash inflows with the PV of cost of the than minimum desired rate of return or cost of capital Reject the
investment which produces them. It is also the equivalent maximum rate proposal if the IRR is lower than the minimum desired rate of return.
of interest that could be paid each year for the capital employed over the Thus:
life of an investment without loss on the project.
If: IRR ≥ Required rate of return; ACCEPT
If: IRR < Required rate of return; REJECT

21 22

Discounted Cash Flow (Time-Adjusted) Approach Non-discounted Cash Flow (Unadjusted) Approach
3. Profitability Index Decision Rule:
Also known as the present value index, benefit-cost rate, and desirability The higher the profitability index, the more desirable the project is.
index. The ratio of the total PV of future cash inflows to the initial Projects with the index of less than 1 are rejected Thus:
investment. The index expresses the present value of cash benefits as
to an amount per peso investment in a project and is used as a measure If: PV Index ≥ 1; ACCEPT
of ranking projects in a descending order of desirability. This is If: PV Index < 1; REJECT
computed as:
PV index=

23 24

6
07/05/2023

Discounted Cash Flow (Time-Adjusted) Approach


4. Discounted Payback Period

Equivalent
A method that recognizes the time value of money in a payback context.
The periodic cash flows are discounted using an appropriate cost of
capital rate and accumulated until they equal the amount of investment.

Annual
The length of time required to equalize the discounted cash flows and
investment is the discounted payback period.

Annuity (EAA)
25

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) Approach Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) Approach
EAA approach is a method which calculates the annual payments a For example:
project would provide if it were an annuity. X Company is contemplating on investing in a new machine costing
P200,000 with the following expected cash returns:
The EAA method involves the followinf basic steps. These are:
Year 1 P 70,000
1. Find the project’s NPV over its initial life. Year 2 130,000
2. Find the value of EAA. Year 3 120,000
The cost of capital is 10%.

What is the EAA for this project?

27 28

7
07/05/2023

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) Approach Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) Approach
Step 1: Compute for the NPV Step 2: Compute for the EAA

Initial investment (P200,000*1) (200,000.00)


Annual Cash Returns 51,555 = EAA x (PV of an annuity of 1 for 3 years @ 12%)
Year 1 (70,000*0.8929) 62,503.00 51,555 = EAA (2.4018)
Year 2 (130,000*0.7972) 103,636.00 EAA = 51,555 / 2.4018
Year 3 (120,000*0.7118) 85,416.00 EAA = P21,465
Net Present Value 51,555.00

29 30

Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) Approach

Investment
Step 3: Analysis

This analysis is useful when comparing mutually exclusively objects with

Project Ranking/
different lives.

The project with the higher EAA will always have the higher NPV when

Prerence
extended out to any common life. Hence, the project with a higher EAA
should be chosen.

Decision
31

8
07/05/2023

Methods used in making Preference Decisions Internal Rate of Return Method


Preference decisions come after screening decisions and attempt to The preference rule when using the internal rate of return method to run
resolve the question of “How do the investment proposal, all of which competing investment project is:
have been screened and provide an acceptable rate of return, rank in “The higher the internal rate of return, the more desirable is the project.”
terms of preference?”.
This method, despite the use for two mainly reasons, namely:
Basically, either the internal rate of return method or the net present 1. No additional computation need to be made beyond those already
value method can be used in making preferences. performed in making initial screening decisions.
2. The ranking data are recently understood by management.

33 34

Net Present Value Method Comparing the Preference Rates


The net present volume method can be used to rank competing • If an independent project is being evaluated, then the NPV and the
investment projects if the projects are of equal size, that is, investment IRR criteria always lead to the same accept/reject decision.
funds required are the same. If competing projects require different • For mutually exclusive projects (among acceptable alternative)
amount of funding, it may be necessary to compute the profitability especially those that differ in scale (project size) and/or timing of
index. Profitability index is computed by dividing the present value of conflict may arise.
cash flows by the investment required. • The IRR method may favor one alternative over another, while the
NPV method may indicate otherwise. It conflicts arise, the NPV
The preference rule to rank competing investment projects using the method should be used.
profitability index is: • The NPV method assumes that the cash flows will be reinvested at
“The higher the profitability index, the more desirable is the project.” the firm’s cost of capital, while the IRR method assumes reinvestment
at the project’s IRR.

35 36

9
07/05/2023

Comparing the Preference Rates


• Because of reinvestment at the cost of capital is generally a better
(closer to reality) assumption, the NPV is superior to the IRR.
• The profitability Index is conceptually superior to the internal rate of
return, as method of making preference decisions. The reason is that
the profitability index will always give a correct indication as to the
relative desirability of alternatives, even if alternatives have different
Capital
lives and different pattern of earnings. On the other hand, if lives are
unequal, the internal rate of return method can lead the manager to
make incorrect decision.
Rationing
37

Capital Rationing Types of Capital Rationing


• A situation in which management places a constraint on the total size • Soft rationing occurs when different units in a business are allocated
of the firm’s capital budget during a particular period. some fixed amount of money each year for capital spending. It is
done as a means of controlling and keeping track of overall spending,
• It is also described as the selection of investment proposals in a in spite of the fact that the business firm is not short of capital and
situation of constraint on availability of capital funds to maximize the funds can be raised on ordinary terms if management so desires.
wealth of a company by selecting those projects which will maximize
overall net present value of the firm. • Hard rationing occurs when a business cannot raise financing for a
project under any circumstances. This can occur when a business
experience is financial distress, meaning that bankruptcy is a
possibility.

39 40

10

You might also like