Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

AMIT2043 Web Systems and Technologies Cover Page

AMIT2043 Web Systems and Technologies

Assignment
Programme :

Tutorial Class :

Society / Club :

Total Mark
No. Student Name Student ID
(100)

1
2
3

Lecturer: Practical Tutor :

Date of Submission:

Group Assignment: Marking Rubric


AMIT2043 Web Systems and Technologies Assignment: Marking Rubric

Prototype
NO CRITERIA TOTA Poor Average Good Excellent MARK
L
MARK
1. Web design, 30 0 – 7 marks 8 – 16 marks 17 - 25 marks 26 – 30 marks
System
Prototype and Poor design website, not Poor design website, but A good and consistent Excellent, consistent, and
HTML Form related to the society and easy to view the website. Easy to view the attractive website.
Controls event, difficult to view information. information.
the information. Excellent and detailed
Average web prototype Good and detailed web System prototype shows
Poor web prototype shows some of the prototype shows the the complete usability
shows minimal part of usability and the complete usability and and the functioning of
the usability and functioning of the system the functioning of the the system.
functional of the system. system
Few of the right HTML All HTML form controls
HTML form controls are form controls are used Most of HTML form are well structured and
used inappropriately. Fail correctly. Able to controls are used the right HTML controls
to minimize input errors. minimize some of the correctly. Able to are used correctly to
input errors. minimize most of the minimize most of the
input errors. input errors.

30 TOTAL MARK:

Academic Year 2023/2024 Page 2 of 4


AMIT2043 Web Systems and Technologies Assignment: Marking Rubric

System
NO CRITERIA TOTA Poor Average Good Excellent MARK
L
MARK
1. Database 10 0 – 2 mark 3 – 5 marks 6 – 8 marks 9 – 10 marks
Poor database design. Average database design Good database design Good database design
Some fields are missing. with all fields. Some field with all fields and with correct relationship
Field properties are not properties are not set appropriate properties defined.
set (i.e. left to default). accordingly. (field size, data type, etc).
2. Functionality: - 30 0 – 7 marks 8 – 16 marks 17 – 25 marks 26 – 30 marks
Listing, Insert, Many requirements are Few requirements are All requirements are All requirements are
Update, Delete, not achieved. Module not achieved. Module achieved. Module works achieved. Module works
Search and Filter does not work as still works with little or as expected. But no perfectly. Enhancements
expected or contains a lot some acceptable flaws. enhancement added. are added.
of flaws.
3. Programming 10 0 – 2 marks 3 – 5 marks 6 – 8 marks 9 – 10 marks
Logic and Style Poor programming logic. Average programming Good programming logic. Very good programming
Source codes are not logic. Source codes are Source code is logic. Source code is very
readable and hard to less readable and need structured, effective, well-structured, effective,
understand. Variable more time to readable, and easy to well-tested, highly
names are not understand. Most of the understand. Variable readable, and easy to
meaningful. Standard and variable names are names are meaningful. understand. Variable
convention are not meaningful. Standard Standard and convention names are meaningful.
followed. No comments and convention are are followed. Comments Standard and convention
are used. followed sometimes. are used. are followed. Comments
Comments are used. are used appropriately.
4. Usability 10 0 – 2 marks 3 – 5 marks 6 – 8 marks 9 – 10 marks
Poor society/event Average society/event Good user experience in Excellent user experience
management system, management system, society/event in society/event
very minimal functions. average functions added. management system. management system.
Not user friendly and Easy to use. Useful functions added. Excellent functions

Academic Year 2023/2024 Page 3 of 4


AMIT2043 Web Systems and Technologies Assignment: Marking Rubric

NO CRITERIA TOTA Poor Average Good Excellent MARK


L
MARK
hard to use. Not ready to deploy and User friendly and easy to added.
Not ready to deploy and a lot of improved need to use. Very user friendly and
not able to use by the be used by the society. Able to deploy and be easy to use.
society. used by the society with Ready to deploy and used
minimal improvement. by the society.
5. Additional 10 0 – 2 marks 3 – 5 marks 6 – 8 marks 9 – 10 marks
Features No or very primitive Simple features are Features added are Features added are very
features are added, added, which are easy to useful, required some useful, required a lot of
which require no or only implement, and work coding efforts, and are coding efforts, and are
a little coding effort. well. implemented correctly. implemented perfectly.

70 TOTAL MARK:

Additional Feedback (if any):

Academic Year 2023/2024 Page 4 of 4

You might also like